Talk:Classless society

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Untitled Thread[edit]

i agree —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.230.55.50 (talkcontribs) 13:28, January 31, 2007

yes, this should indeed be merged... Wickedxjade 10:54, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Done, but it's not as seamless as it could be. Tocharianne 17:55, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Interwiki Advice[edit]

Added the note about the german wiki since I see that in neither does this article have a Marxism or other project template. If there is an existing tag for this purpose please use it instead. 74.78.162.229 (talk) 15:27, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Lede Rewrite[edit]

The prior text was simple-minded, crude, distorting, etc. My heart sank a little when I saw the degree to which I'm a major contributor to this article. OTOH it was bouyed by the realization that except for the problem of education and all that it entails, we actually are pretty close right now. 72.228.150.44 (talk) 18:02, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Also removed {{German|Klassenlose Gesellschaft|October 16, 2006}} from the references section, a survey of the interwiki links indicates this is by far the most substantial article ATM. Lycurgus (talk) 04:19, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

OR Tag on Central Concept §[edit]

It's current position in mainspace is not Classless society (Marxism) so some discussion of the subject of the article from perspectives other than Marxism is appropriate. I didn't see anything meriting the tags especially and will remove if no further comment. 72.228.177.92 (talk) 18:33, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Actually went ahead and did a clean-up as noted in the edit log. 72.228.177.92 (talk) 18:41, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Current State[edit]

While I did clean the Classlessness §, didn't comprehensively address the other one. I'm already far and away the major contributor to this article so I didn't want to do the same for the other. FTR I am aware that it makes ignorant statements about Marxist theory in the first sentence of the first ¶ 72.228.177.92 (talk) 19:00, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Socialism[edit]

in my opinion socialism is not classless it is defined as a unequal distribution of money —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.238.167.85 (talk) 00:10, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Confusing section[edit]

In the section titled Marxist Definition, the 2nd and 3rd paragraph do not seem to fit together. I thought that the second paragraph seemed inconclusive. Ninjastriker13 (talk) 19:53, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

further editing needed[edit]

'completed, as the productive forces burst their confinement in bourgeois society as they did those of feudal- and orientalism, and the contradiction of class society is finally resolved into a version of the prior classless state but at the much higher level of human development that would be in effect then.' — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.84.68.252 (talk) 02:21, 7 March 2013 (UTC)