This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of countries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CountriesWikipedia:WikiProject CountriesTemplate:WikiProject Countriescountry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Hi Nederlandse Leeuw, I just wanted to pop in and say thanks for creating this. Also want to repeat what I mentioned about complexity. The legal/illegal binary can be misleading. For example, in the US it was banned only for minors. This meant that adult women could be reinfibulated. But elsewhere (e.g. UK and Sweden), consent for FGM cannot be given. Also note that the federal law in the US was deemed unconstitutional in 2018. [1]
When you say that it's illegal in the table, you should check the situation of adult women. Does this mean in, say, Sudan that they cannot now be reinfibulated after childbirth even if they want to be? These are difficult issues. SarahSV(talk)00:09, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi SarahSV, thank you for expressing this appreciation. My initial reaction to your removal of the original list in the main FGM contained some annoyance, as I wished you had consulted me before deleting it, but I knew you meant it well and you had several legitimate points that I agreed with, so I took a positive and constructive approach. It wasn't until after your response that I checked out your userpage and was overwhelmed and a little humbled by the experience and expertise you actually already had in this and related fields on Wikipedia, including raising the main FGM article to featured status and launching the Gender Gap Task Force (I myself am a member of the WikiProject Gendergap on Dutch Wikipedia, perhaps I should join your task force as well?). It would be an honour to work with you. :)
On point, I wasn't aware of this age issue, how does that work? Could you give me a link to a source that explains that? And should we explain that and similar issues in the 'status' column or rather in the 'notes' column? I suppose the 'status' column only allows for a very short description and the notes may contain a longer explanation, just like we did in the Marital rape laws by country article (I suppose I could rename the column 'Criminalised' rather than 'Status' following its example). And yes, I had heard about the U.S. federal law being declared unconstitutional some time ago, I was planning on reviewing that issue later. My primary concern now is filling in general information about each country first and adding specifics later. I can't do everything at once though, one step at a time. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 00:49, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The use of red to represent legality and green to represent illegality clearly contrasts with pages like “Abortion laws by country” or the gay rights law articles, which portray legality as green and blue, and so on. The point is, this is a double standard, as colors such as red and black, typically considered “negative” colors, are used to denote illegality most of the time, while here they denote legality, hinting that Wikipedia itself may swing towards an issue, something that would violate NPOV. Please update the color scheme to match those of similar legality maps/graphs/keys. ¢onnallΣ$ 06:33, 20 February 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ConnallES (talk • contribs)
,_early_1900s,_Central_Africa,_Democratic_Republic_of_the_Congo,_Pende_people,_wood,_fiber_-_Cleveland_Museum_of_Art_-_DSC08700.JPG){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
