Talk:Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Peer review[edit]

I've recently opened a peer review for this article after improving and working substantially on it. Anyone who is interested is welcome to leave comments and criticisms, or even improve the page if so desired. Cheers, Katástasi (κατάσταση) 21:56, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Bolder Media removal[edit]

An IP user kept on removing Bolder Media from the infobox and claims that we don't talk about overseas studios when we actually do. In addition, he/she refused to discuss his/her objection on this talk page. I also give this two warnings and they got removed. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 13:47, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

FilmandTVFan28 Hey, I'm one of the main editors of this article, but I've been away from it in a while. I just recently saw the fuss and I just looked up the infobox guidelines here, and I believe I understand what the IP meant, even if he was extremely disruptive and didn't think of explaining the removal. I extensively expanded the article in December and early January, and Boulder Media's involvement in the production process is mentioned in the Production section, though I hadn't added it in the infobox. I believe the company would fit the infobox guidelines of the Company parameter. Feel free to read the guidelines and reply. Cheers, κατάσταση 01:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Well, considering that some of the article's of shows currently airing on television and of movies have some overseas studios mentioned in their infoboxes, I see no reason why we should not include Boulder Media in the infobox if a source can be provided as the guidelines said. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 07:26, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:12, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Smash linguistic barbarism[edit]

   If anything, kid-culture articles should be more careful in policing grammatical sloppiness like (trying to reconstruct the wretched syntax from memory, on this iPad II platform) "genuinely developed sympathy", which implies that it is the process of development that is genuine, as if we are expected to value the sincerity (rather than mechanically imitating stages of becoming sympathetic) entailed in perfecting a convincing imitation of "giving a damn" about fictional characters. I do a pretty good imitation (as it were) of respecting humanistic values even tho i'm a pretty shallow tech nerd; it would be really swell if more genuine Renaissance humanists would belly up to the bar, and distinguish between developing apparent sympathy that passes for genuine sympathy, and the however chaotic and unplanned process of being lucky enuf to wander, like the "innocent fool" Parsifal, into the shared suffering we expect when someone acts with authentic "sympathy" authentic "sympathy". Those, whom we should hope to become, are beings who have "developed..." (or just wandered into) "... authentic sympathy". Okay? Cultivate sensitivity to our best instincts, and the development will probably occur, if the hope of compassion being the direction that evolution trends toward is not a mirage.
   (Perhaps that diatribe is inspired by the wisdom of Cixin Liu that The Three-Body Problem hints at.)
--Jerzyt 09:54, 8 & 23:23, 10 January 2018 (UTC)