Jump to content

Talk:Hinomoto Oniko

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Have any of the moefags that edited this article ever studied World War II, let alone the Rape of Nanjing or Unit 731? Don't you dare give a pro-japanese bias on the island issue within this article before you learn your history. Furthermore... why does this article even exist? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.229.148.57 (talkcontribs)

Your views are quite ironic, given that nowadays there are more liberal netizens in China, that aren't right-wing conservatives. Make a similar statement on Mop.com and people will claim that you're a 50 center. China itself most likely has the largest population of "moefags", given the increase in such topics on Baidu Tieba, and submissions on Pixiv coming from Chinese users. This article doesn't even mention Unit 731, so I have no idea what you're trying to imply. Furthermore, may I remind you that Wikipedia is not a WP:FORUM. There is a place for such discussion, and this is not the correct location. -- 李博杰  | Talk contribs email 04:17, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hinomoto Oniko. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:04, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]