This article was created or improved during the Alphabet run: M & N edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Red project in January 2024. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
A fact from Maria Kalyuzhnaya appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 February 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: I actually created the article for Maria Kovalevska on 1 December 2023, but held off on nominating her as I thought this hook would work better as a multi-article nomination. If this is a problem for newness (I couldn't find any specifics about multi-noms in the guidelines), then I can withdraw the nomination. --Grnrchst (talk) 18:20, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To be clear. Nominator is asking for permission to present Maria Kovalevska, which was created on 1 December 2023 as a featured link in a 3-article hook. Here are the newness summaries:
Nadia Smyrnytska 1558 characters created on Jan 25 (all good)
I just wanted to note that 561 characters is the WP:LEAD meaning that the LEAD is more than half as long as the rest of the article. Is there any more content for the body?-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:00, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Maria Kalyuzhnaya 1390 1738 characters created on Jan 25 (routine expansion request all good)
Maria Kovalevska 1976 characters created on December 1 (seems to be quite a bit 7 weeks, not days, late)-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:25, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have expanded Maria Kalyuzhnaya's article with another sentence, per your request. This should bring it over the line. --Grnrchst (talk) 09:27, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
QPQs require an equivalent number of articles (2 or 3 in this case, waiting on a ruling).-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 13:30, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm happy to do more reviews to satisfy QPQ if that's the case. I think guidelines on multi-article nominations need to be better established, as I'm still rather confused as to how I was supposed to go about this. --Grnrchst (talk) 15:04, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are dozens of DYK subpages, so I am not sure what to say. We have a ping out to the admins, who may have some expertise. I guess I will take a few minutes bouncing around looking for guidance.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:27, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I asked in the talk page and found out that it is actually mentioned in WP:QPQ, I must have missed it while looking through the guidelines. I have now reviewed two other articles, in order to bring QPQ up to the line for this nomination. --Grnrchst (talk) 15:47, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(ec) Seven weeks late is well beyond what can be accepted via IAR. That link cannot be in bold font. On the plus side, it means that only two QPQs are required. Schwede66 15:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've already done the other QPQs. I'd understand a late article being rejected as a standalone nomination. But as part of a multi-nomination where it was an action that these three women took together, I still think they all need to be bold. It would end up looking odd to remove the bold formatting for just one of them. --Grnrchst (talk) 15:56, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think there was an ec, but the ruling is that the December article can not run as a featured (bolded) article. You will have a QPQ review in the bank for future use. I would suggest submitting an ALT hook. I realize it may be the exact same with debolding, but since you may want to rearrange or rephrase, I am asking you to formally repropose a new hook for consideration.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 16:45, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Grnrchst, this has happened with multihook nominations in the past, when one or more of the articles have been rejected for various reasons, from age to insufficient length to excessive duplication between the nominated articles (duplicated text can only be counted toward one of the articles): the non-bold link is a way to include the article that, for whatever reason, did not qualify for DYK. It would probably look less odd if the hook were reordered so Maria Kovalevska is listed third of the three women; that decision is up to you. I do think it's better to include all three women rather than omit Kovalevska entirely; her article will get some attention due to the link. I'm sorry that things didn't work out this time for that one article. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:02, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I'm not happy about it but here's an ALT with Kovalevska de-bolded and rearranged:
Sigida wasn't Ukrainian, so your proposed ALT3 is just inaccurate. No issues with ALT2. --Grnrchst (talk) 16:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also be advised that the following is redundant content:
"In protest against the abuse of imprisoned women in Kara, she committed suicide in November 1889,[4] alongside Nadezhda Sigida and fellow Ukrainian revolutionaries Maria Kovalevska and Maria Kalyuzhna." (201 characters) in Nadia Smyrnytska
"In November 1889, Kalyuzhnaya committed suicide by poisoning together with Sigida, Kovalevska and Smyrnytska, in protest against the abuse of women by the prison authorities." (174 characters) in Maria Kalyuzhnaya
The character counts for newness need to be reduced. The character counts thus become 1558 and 1738 1564. However, I am not sure how to address the very puffy WP:LEAD in the Smyrnytska article.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:48, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you think the lead is puffy, it would be helpful if you could point out where and why you think that's the case. --Grnrchst (talk) 16:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have shortened the LEAD a bit. It is now 1504 characters. Taking a few minor details out leaves the main body reader with a feeling of learning more than the summary in the LEAD.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:02, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think the hook needs to be specific about what they were protesting, it can't just vaguely say "to protest abuse", because that could mean anything. Suggesting: ALT6: ... that Ukrainians Nadia Smyrnytska, Maria Kalyuzhnaya and Maria Kovalevska joined other prisoners in committing suicide to protest against the abuse of imprisoned women in Kara katorga? --Grnrchst (talk) 13:40, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As we have experienced the rules for multiple hooks are not clear. It is my understanding that you are shooting for 100 characters, plus characters for each additional featured link. Thus, I think we are shooting for 117 characters at most. ALT 6 is 183, whereas ALT 4 is 129, which is within striking distance of 117.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 00:18, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure where you're getting the 100 character limit from. WP:DYKMOS is very specific that hooks have a maximum limit of 200 characters. I don't care if ALT4 is shorter, it's lacking vital information. --Grnrchst (talk) 08:58, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Both remaining articles are sourced and neutral. As an English speaker, I have to WP:AGF on much of the sourcing.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:37, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I guess so. My last comment was kind of a question, but I can go forward and approve it as is.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 23:26, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I guess so. My last comment was kind of a question, but I can go forward and approve it as is.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 23:26, 2 February 2024 (UTC)