Talk:Melanie's Marvelous Measles

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Melanie's Marvelous Measles article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Literature Low‑importance

	Australia portal Melanie's Marvelous Measles is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian literature (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Children's literature Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Melanie's Marvelous Measles appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 March 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the anti-vaccine book Melanie's Marvelous Measles has received over 1,000 one-star reviews on Amazon.com?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Melanie's Marvelous Measles.

Wikipedia

Great minds...

I've been working on this page in my user space for several weeks, I had it almost done, just was going to clean up the grammar and then publish it, now I see that someone else has beat me to it. I like the writing style with this page. So I'm going to just see if I can add the content from my weeks of work to this page. I hope it is seamless, but apologize if not. Will welcome someone to help smooth over the two writing styles to make it a stronger page.Sgerbic (talk) 04:39, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gorski quote

This quote in the Reception section is accurate to the source. "The death of a single child, whatever the cause, is a tragedy. If we want to see a lot more of these tragedies, all we have to do is to be complacent and let the vaccination rate fall too far below herd enormity." However, I'm fairly certain the word 'enormity' should be 'immunity'. I don't know how to handle such a thing, so I bring it up here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geneocide (talk • contribs) 16:06, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The MOS guidance is at WP:MOSQUOTE and I read it as saying {{sic}} should be added. It isn't cool to point out a silly mistake but it would be too much the correct it silently, I think. Thincat (talk) 16:54, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen to it. Thincat (talk) 13:32, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dates

It seems according to the counter in AWB that there are two styles used. Should we {{use dmy dates}} or should we {{use mdy dates}} here? I prefer the former if we can't use ISO dates, which we can't. Jerodlycett (talk) 21:52, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jerodlycett Stick to DMY - the author and the book are Australian, and Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Choice_of_format says "Articles on topics with strong ties to a particular English-speaking country should generally use the more common date format for that country".--Gronk Oz (talk) 01:57, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seems mainly in the citations anyway. The bit I was thinking of when asking was WP:DATERET as I wasn't sure of the strong national ties bit. I may go through later and convert to ISO with the {{date}} format's dmy option, and leave {{use dmy dates}} hanging around. Jerodlycett (talk) 02:08, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possible links

I'm not very great with prose, so I'll leave it to someone else, but likely candidates to link here are David Gorski, William Sears (physician) and Australian Vaccination-Skeptics Network. The first two for their statements, and the third for their support and the fact they are selling it. Jerodlycett (talk) 01:47, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]