Talk:OfflineTV
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Quote in the introduction.
[edit]Do you guys think it is best to just remove the quote? If you look under Poki's section, there already is a quote that is largely similar to the one in the lede. CrispyCream27 • talk • user page 06:51, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Quotes should never be in a lede of an article, unless it is difficult to explain the concept of the article without such a thing. It's a very generic quote, and should be removed. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:18, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Removal of Twitch followers / YouTube subscriber count in the member list
[edit]Might wanna consider removing those figures. It's tough to update all of those entries and I feel like all of those numbers are an eyesore to look at. CrispyCream27 (Talk) 07:08, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Good choice, it's really hard to keep updating the list. Delta fiver (talk) ,07:56, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Remove details on former members?
[edit]I feel like expanded details on former members seems out of place and will naturally be the biggest part of this article eventually. I think it makes more sense to just have the table of former members with years added. What does anyone think? Noonehasthisnameithink (talk) 22:15, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
- If their contributions were significant enough to warrant explanation of who they were, then it seems like that is relevant information to the article and should stay. Perfectirony (talk) 07:22, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Rename to OfflineTV
[edit]To keep continuity, shouldn't the TV be paired with Offline and not seperated? For reference, use JonTron as an example
I agree, although I'm not authorized to conduct a page move, I'll consult someone who is. Delta fiver (talk) (UTC) 09:26, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
- Currently in the process of getting someone to delete the "OfflineTV" redirect page to make way for the move. Troutfarm27 (Talk) 09:56, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
- thank you Niko3818 (talk) 23:10, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Proposed merge of information
[edit]I feel the article LilyPichu should have it's information be merged into the OfflineTV main article and her subsection, citing the reason that it doesn't effectively warrant a stand alone article as it seems to fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. Please discuss it on the Talk:LilyPichu talk page. Delta fiver (talk) (UTC) 09:23, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Move back to Offline TV
[edit]As "Offline TV" is the stylisation used by most media reports and the official YouTube channel, I think the article should be moved back.--17jiangz1 (talk) 05:24, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- I don't agree with that, as consensus regarding the name was reached, aside from that all other platforms they communicate through, identify by the name of OfflineTV. Delta fiver (talk) (UTC) 07:11, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Background info sub-section.
[edit]Since all the main members have articles, is there any purpose of keeping their info in that sub-section? as I feel it just lengthens the article with no real purpose and just clouds the page further. I don't mind keeping the explanations of those that don't have articles yet or just keeping the lead explanation of the main members rather than having a complete explanation, because you can just click on their page and learn more. Do let me know. Delta fiver (talk) (UTC) 06:43, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
New Image
[edit]Waiting to use [1] as new infobox image whenever/if it gets proper verification of permissions granted. I just cropped the orginal[2] before realizing that it was still pending verification. Obviously is a much better picture as it is more recent and includes all current members with no former. Wondering what to do with current one from TwitchCon, perhaps move it down to former member section. Not sure if the Picture of Yvonnie and Reeves would still be needed as I believe they were added because they weren't picture in main picture. WikiVirusC(talk) 19:23, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- I expect that the TwitchCon photo will be deleted from the commons soon --- wvdp (talk) 12:09, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Current Members Chart
[edit]The formatting is off for the Current Members Chart in comparison to the Former Members Chart. I don't know how to fix it, but if someone can, ty.
DZL (talk) 06:14, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:23, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Remove the members' Twitch follower and view counts?
[edit]I'm gonna be bold and wait for a consensus on this; should we remove the members' Twitch follower and view counts? Because the members' subscriber and view counts are removed from the YouTube section; plus, this article is about the group itself, not the members. L33tm4n (talk) 01:50, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- As of September 22, 2021, I have not yet received any replies involving this subject. Until a consensus is reached, the members' Twitch stats will remain. L33tm4n (talk) 02:48, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Delta fiver: I saw your reply on the previous discussion. Do you think we should remove the members' Twitch stats? L33tm4n (talk) 16:45, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- I agree @L33tm4n:, it is a pain to keep updating. Delta fiver (talk) (UTC) 03:20, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
This is under the Pokimane section in the article.
[edit](Redacted)
Kinda funny cause I ended up here after trying to figure out what was going on with the Pokimane drama, and I find this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yummyfoodisgood (talk • contribs) 05:27, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for mentioning it. I reverted the vandalism, and redacted your quotation of it above. Firefangledfeathers 05:31, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- C-Class Internet culture articles
- Low-importance Internet culture articles
- WikiProject Internet culture articles
- C-Class YouTube articles
- Low-importance YouTube articles
- WikiProject YouTube articles
- C-Class video game articles
- Low-importance video game articles
- WikiProject Video games articles
- C-Class California articles
- Low-importance California articles
- C-Class Los Angeles articles
- Low-importance Los Angeles articles
- Los Angeles area task force articles
- WikiProject California articles