Talk:Verónica Boquete

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Chicago

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Football: American & Canadian / France / Germany / Spain / Women's football High‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American and Canadian soccer task force (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the French football task force (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the German football task force (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Spanish football task force (assessed as High-importance).
	Women's association football portal This article is supported by the women's football task force (assessed as High-importance).

Galicia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Galicia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Galicia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GaliciaWikipedia:WikiProject GaliciaTemplate:WikiProject GaliciaGalicia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's sport: WOSO High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Women's association football portal This article is supported by the Women's football / soccer task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus for move. Favonian (talk) 18:43, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Verónica Boquete → Veronica Boquete – Reliable sources such as her professional league, FIFA, and local media all spell her name without the accent. We should match. (N.B.: the target title was a redlink until I just created it, contrary to our clear guidelines at WP:DIACRITICS.) Powers ^T 18:15, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. No established usage. HandsomeFella (talk) 09:40, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I provided three examples of established usage, from three reliable sources. What more are you looking for? Powers ^T 12:18, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. WIkipedia does not encourage nor discourage diacritics. In this case, the subject is a Spanish national without great prominence outside of her own country until very recently, it seems. All the sources in the article use the form of name with diacritics. --Ohconfucius ^¡digame! 09:31, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- That's just not true. First of all, the four (out of five) that do use the diacritics are Spanish. We do not use Spanish-language sources to determine the English-language title of our articles. Second of all, the one source that is in Englisnh -- her official player page -- doesn't use diacritics, as I already mentioned in the nomination. Powers ^T 14:38, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. This name is given without diacritics by the Boston Globe and by the New York Times. Kauffner (talk) 16:32, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per encyclopedic practice and proper English. Wikipedia is not a newspaper or a sports organization. Prolog (talk) 20:47, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not up to us to decide what her name is in English. Every English-language source I've found so far spells her name without diacritics. Powers ^T 22:53, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Per authoritative sources, her actual name is also the correct spelling of the name in English. It makes no difference how many sources you can find for a misspelling. Prolog (talk) 23:45, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - Just what do you consider authoritative, then, if not the web site for her employer? Powers ^T 12:49, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      - CMoS, AMA and APA are authoritative sources on the English language. Football teams are not. Prolog (talk) 15:53, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        ... and what do they have to say about the spelling of Veronica Boquete's name? Powers ^T 16:45, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        Style manuals are not dictionaries. Spanish personal names must be spelled correctly as a matter of house style. Prolog (talk) 18:01, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        I believe you are misinterpreting our house style. WP:AT, which is policy, states: "Wikipedia does not necessarily use the subject's "official" name as an article title; it prefers to use the name that is most frequently used to refer to the subject in English-language reliable sources." Every reliable English-language source spells her name without diacritics; that, thus, is the name we should use, per policy. Powers ^T 18:08, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        Our de facto policy on this matter can be seen on Category:Spanish people (WP:NOTBURO, also a policy), and it is in line with other general-purpose encyclopedias. The idea that BLP titles should be decided through case-by-case Google popularity contests is a minority view in the community and completely nonexistent in serious publications. Prolog (talk) 18:22, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        What is the name that is most frequently used to refer to the subject in English-language reliable sources? Powers ^T 19:35, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        "Veronica Boquete" is not a name but a spelling that, while common in the mass media, is unsuitable for an encyclopedia. CMoS puts it well: "While common usage can excuse many slipshod expressions, the standards of good usage make demands on writers and editors." Prolog (talk) 20:27, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        For good or ill, we don't follow the Chicago Manual of Style, we have our own house style. WP:ENGLISH says, "[W]hen deciding between versions of a word which differ in the use or non-use of modified letters, follow the general usage in reliable sources that are written in the English language (including other encyclopedias and reference works)." Powers ^T 20:45, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        We indeed have a house style (actual established practice, as visible from the shortest stubs to featured articles) and it is firmly in line with the five pillars instead of anyone's favourite written rules, or interpretations thereof. Prolog (talk) 23:58, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Question - Have we got an example of an authoritative English-language source that uses the accent? Prolog, or anyone else, do you know of one? -GTBacchus^(talk) 21:15, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Authoritative English sources, as I see it, very rarely exist for even highly well-known active athletes. Enter style guides and the practices of other encyclopedias. However, I'll note that the claim that no English-language sources include the accent mark for this person turned out to be untrue. Prolog (talk) 23:58, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, I got tired of typing "I've found so far" every time. By the time I dropped it, I thought it safely assumed as a caveat to "every English-language source". Powers ^T 01:40, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, for all the usual reasons when requests of this kind are made - WP's consistent style is to include diacritics in the hundreds of thousands of cases like this, and to deviate from it in isolated cases on some random whim would be to do a disservice to (and even mislead) readers.--Kotniski (talk) 08:22, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not random whim, it's following the sources. Powers ^T 10:50, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yes, and that (in the sense you mean here) is not what we generally do, so you end up with a few articles that deviate from the standard for no particular reason except that the anti-diacritics brigade have had their teeth into them, thus leading to pointless random variation that has the potential to mislead readers.--Kotniski (talk) 13:17, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - We don't follow sources? Someone needs to alert WT:Article titles! Powers ^T 13:24, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      - Sure, we don't follow sources in matters of typography, or we'd be all over the place. --Kotniski (talk) 14:10, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        As other opponents of this move have pointed out, this isn't a matter of typography, it's one of spelling. Powers ^T 16:43, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        OK, whatever it's a matter of, we don't necessarily imitate sources in such matters.--Kotniski (talk) 17:22, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        According to WP:DIACRITICS, yes, we do. Powers ^T 17:54, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Blacklisted Links Found on Verónica Boquete

Cyberbot II has detected links on Verónica Boquete which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.change.org/petitions/ea-sports-incluyan-jugadoras-en-su-videojuego-de-f%C3%BAtbol-fifa
Triggered by \bchange\.org\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:03, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on Verónica Boquete

Cyberbot II has detected links on Verónica Boquete which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.change.org/petitions/ea-sports-incluyan-jugadoras-en-su-videojuego-de-f%C3%BAtbol-fifa
Triggered by \bchange\.org\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:50, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Verónica Boquete. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:48, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]