Turquerie

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Madame de Pompadour portrayed as a Turkish lady in 1747 by Charles André van Loo
Portrait of Sultan Mehmed II by Gentile Bellini (ca. 1480, but largely repainted later), who visited Istanbul and painted many Turkish scenes
Agostino Veneziano's depiction of Suleyman the Magnificent. Note the 4 tiers on the helmet which he had commissioned from Venice (an untypical piece of headgear for an Ottoman sultan, which he probably never normally wore, but placed beside him when receiving visitors, especially ambassadors),[1] symbolizing his imperial power and excelling the 3-tiered papal tiara.[2]
Man In Oriental Costume ("The Noble Slav"), oil on canvas, by Rembrandt, 1632. A significant example of European emulation of Ottoman dress for the purpose of portraying a dignified, elite appearance.

Turquerie (Anglicized as "Turkery") was the Orientalist fashion in Western Europe from the 16th to 18th centuries for imitating aspects of Turkish art and culture. Many different Western European countries were fascinated by the exotic and relatively unknown culture of Turkey, which was the center of the Ottoman Empire, and at the beginning of the period the only power to pose a serious military threat to Europe. The West had a growing interest in Turkish-made products and art, including music, visual arts, architecture, and sculptures. This fashionable phenomenon became more popular through trading routes and increased diplomatic relationships between the Ottomans and the European nations, exemplified by the Franco-Ottoman alliance in 1715. Ambassadors and traders often returned home with tales of exotic places and souvenirs of their adventures.[3]

The movement was often reflected in the art of the period. Music, paintings, architecture, and artifacts were frequently inspired by the Turkish and Ottoman styles and methods. Paintings in particular portrayed the Ottomans with bright colours and sharp contrasts, suggesting their interesting peculiarity and exotic nature.[4]

History of the movement[edit]

In the wake of the Age of Exploration, roughly between the 15th and 18th centuries, there was an explosion in the number of commodities and availability of products. People were using newly created cartography and using these maps to explore the world on paper. There was an accumulation of more objects and a desire for more acquisitions. Coupling this, there was the value of exoticism, valuing things that came from a great distance. Europeans and Ottomans alike were developing a consciousness of themselves in relation to the broader world.[5] At the same time the Ottomans were slowly ceasing to be regarded as a serious military threat to Western Europe, despite their continuing occupation of the Balkans, and campaigns such as that ended by the Battle of Vienna as late as 1683.

New patterns of consumption were arising, especially with trading ships being able to navigate around Africa. Commodities that were once expensive were becoming more affordable. Products often define people in terms of gender, age, and availability of access. This notion of social definition outlines the main theme of the explosion of commodities from 16th century and onwards. The exchange system had to do precisely with accessibility and availability of commodities on a grand scale.[6] It is important to note that this was not just a European phenomenon. The Europeans were not the only people who developed a sensibility of how consuming different things could define their relationships domestically and abroad. In this context, there was a broader view of consumption and one’s place within the world. A person would consume in order to show off their financial position and their social location.[6] Coffee is an example of a commodity that became more popular as Europeans "discovered" it in Ottoman lands and experienced it.

European perspective[edit]

Europeans developed an appetite for exoticism as greater emphasis was put on empire building and colonization in other nations. There was a growing fashion for Turkish styles in Europe in the 15th and 16th centuries. Europeans did not regard Ottomans as rivals that they had to contend with and imitate militarily, politically, or diplomatically, but rather as an exotic foreign people possessing quaint and strange fashions that could be consumed. Consuming these exotic fashions would show one’s elite place in society as well as display their open-mindedness and interest in the world.[7] These "obsessions" with Turkish aesthetics were in part brought on by the presence of Europeans in the Ottoman Court and the acts of bringing back their products to Europe.[8] The increased mercantile relationships between the Turkish people and the Europeans aided this process; the continuation of these trading systems helped to spread new fashions quickly in Europe.[3]

Decorations and patterns[edit]

Rudolf, Crown Prince of Austria had his working room decorated in the Turkish style in 1881. It is partially preserved at the Hofmobiliendepot in Vienna.

Brightly colored Turkish styles of decoration were used on many types of objects, including timepieces. Many of those imported had the hours and religious names in Arabic characters. A person who owned one of these timepieces was one with an increased social status.[3]

The Turkish grandeur portrayed by the sultans was attractive to Europeans. Agostino Veneziano made a portrait of Suleyman the Magnificent, sultan of the Ottoman Empire in 1520. He was known as the “grand Turk” and constantly disrupted European balance. The image portrays the sultan as a gentle, yet barbaric person. He was most known for executing the wishes of the sultana, Roxelana, who wanted their children murdered to secure the throne for one of their sons.[2]

Fabrics were often bright, rich, and embroidered, as depicted in the painting, Himan de la Grande Mosquee by Joseph-Marie Vien in 1748. In the context of turquerie, Turkish textiles were also a luxury in the elitist European homes. They often had velvet grounds with stylized floral motifs. They were often woven in Asia Minor for the European market or, more commonly, as Venetian, under Turkish influence. Italian-styled textiles were often woven by the Ottoman Turks for the Venetians because of their cheap labour and continued business relationships.[9]

Portraits: European and American[edit]

Social position was something very important in the 18th century so things like dress, posture, and props were carefully selected in order to communicate one's status. This need to express status mixed with a new interest for Turkish style allowed for Turkish dress and decorations to become very important props.This included wearing loose, flowing gowns belted with ornate bands of embroidered cloth and ermine-trimmed robes with tasseled turbans. Women even abandoned their corsets and attached strings of pearls to their hair for much more freeing material.[10]

The loose clothing and the unorthodox styles added to the lewd perceptions of the Ottomans.[10] This interest was something that motivated the creation of many portraits were Turkish people were often depicted as exotic, and it became rare to see portraits where they were painted without wearing their traditional cultural clothing. Writing also contributed to the visual aspect of Turkish cultural exchange and perhaps the most influential transformation into the turquerie vogue in Europe was done by Lady Mary Wortley Montagu. Montagu went to Turkey in 1717 when her husband was posted as ambassador there. Her collected letters describing Turkish fashion were widely distributed in manuscript form in her social circle and were then printed for the public upon her death in 1762.[11] Her letters and descriptions helped shape how Europeans interpreted the Turkish fashion and how to dress. This phenomenon eventually found its way across the Atlantic and in colonial America, where Montagu’s letters were also published.[12]

Opera[edit]

Two 18th century Turkish women, pastel by Jean-Étienne Liotard, who visited Turkey with a British ambassador in 1738. Unlike their baggy trousers, the huge pattens worn by the women would not have struck Europeans as remarkable, as Western women wore similar overshoes.

In 18th century Europe, it was in fashion to smoke Turkish tobacco in a Turkish pipe, wearing a Turkish robe, all while in an elaborate Turkish costume.[13] European opera was influenced heavily by the idea of turquerie. Mehmed II (1451–1481), the conqueror and one of the most prominent sultans of the Ottoman Empire, had many operas written about him. His defeat of Constantinople in 1453 was the basis of the German opera Mehmed II, composed by Reinhard Keiser in 1693.[5] As well, there were many operas based on the ongoing conflicts between Timur and Beyazid I, including Tamerlano by George Handel. These stories of perseverance and passion appealed to many Europeans and therefore gained popularity. One of France’s most important opera genres was tragedie lyrique, depicted by Scanderberg, with music by François Rebel and Francois Francoeur and the libretto by Antoine Houdar de la Motte in 1735.[14] This opera was visually one of the most elaborate of the Turkish operas, with detailed scenic designs for mosques and seraglio courts. As well, many exotic characters were displayed.

Operas using themes from turquerie were in the usual European languages but tried to imitate the Turkish culture and customs. It offered a world of fantasy, splendor, and adventure that was unattainable by the average person.[14] Audiences would be fascinated with the Turkish and Ottoman institutions depicted. The stories and implications as well as the extravagant costumes and elaborate staging appealed to the people. The Europeans craved reality in their depiction of the Turkish peoples. During performances, females would often be in the latest fashion, where local colour was suggested by foreign attire or numerous ornaments. The males tended to wear more authentic Turkish dress than the female, including a turban, sash, long caftan, and binding with rich material, since authentic Turkish female dress was often restrictive and plain.[15]

Music[edit]

The music in operas that utilized the notion of turquerie was not seriously influenced by Turkish music. Composers in the 18th century were not interested in ethnomusicology, to adopt the style of sound of a particular country or area.[16] The European audiences were not yet ready to accept the unappealing and what they thought of as primitive musical style of the Turkish people. Traditional Turkish music included wavering pitches, microtones, arabesques, different scale systems, and non-Western rhythmic patterns. Europeans thought of this type of music, as Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart once said, "offensive to the ears."[16] Having short spurts of it in the operas were common, but just to add comedic affect.[17]

See also[edit]

Further reading[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Levey (1975), p. 65
  2. ^ a b Metropolitan Museum of Art (1968), p. 229
  3. ^ a b c Metropolitan Museum of Art (1968), p. 236
  4. ^ Stein (1996), p. 430
  5. ^ a b Meyer (1974), p. 475
  6. ^ a b Breskin (1996), p. 97
  7. ^ Breskin (1996), p. 98
  8. ^ Avcıoğlu, Nebahat (2011). Turquerie and the Politics of Representation, 1728-1876. London and New York: Routledge. p. 4. ISBN 9780754664222. 
  9. ^ Metropolitan Museum of Art (1968), p. 227
  10. ^ a b Breskin (2001), p. 99
  11. ^ Breskin (2001), p. 101
  12. ^ Breskin (2001), p. 103
  13. ^ Meyer (1974), p. 474
  14. ^ a b Meyer (1974), p. 476
  15. ^ Meyer (1974), p. 478
  16. ^ a b Meyer (1974), p. 483
  17. ^ Meyer (1974), p. 484

References[edit]

  • Breskin, Isabel (2001). ""On the periphery of a greater world": John Singleton Copley's Turquerie portraits". Winterthur Portfolio. 36 (2/3): 97–123. doi:10.1086/496848. JSTOR 1215305. 
  • Levey, Michael (1975). The World of Ottoman Art. Thames & Hudson. ISBN 0-500-27065-1. 
  • Metropolitan Museum of Art (1968). "Turquerie". The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin. New Series. 26 (5): 225–239. doi:10.2307/3258981. 
  • Meyer, Eve R. (1974). "Turquerie and eighteenth-century music". Eighteenth-Century Studies. 7 (4): 474–488. JSTOR 3031600. 
  • Stein, Perrin (1996). "Amédée Van Loo's costume turc: the French sultana". The Art Bulletin. 78 (3): 417–438. doi:10.1080/00043079.1996.10786695. 

External links[edit]