Jump to content

User:Aeon1006/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is my Talk Archive.

Aeon's Messages

[edit]

Hello, Aeon1006/Archive, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions, and I hope you'll like the place enough to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

You can sign your name and the current date on talk pages and votes by typing in four tildes (~~~~). If you have any questions at all, you can have a look at the help pages, put up a question at the village pump, or ask me on my talk page. Welcome to Wikipedia, and happy editing! - ulayiti (talk) 00:26, 15 August 2005 (UTC)


Hi! I think you've messed up a bit with the VfD entry you've created for Luna class starship. You haven't linked it to the VfD main page (so that people would see it), and you're not supposed to start a new VfD debate this soon after the previous one has ended (it's only been for days). - ulayiti (talk) 00:43, 15 August 2005 (UTC)

No problem, I've added the nomination to Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Log/2005 August 15. - ulayiti (talk) 00:51, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
You can't close the debate, but it will probably be closed by someone after a short while. After it's closed, you should wait a few weeks (I'd suggest at least a month or so) before renominating it. - ulayiti (talk) 01:03, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
I've closed the new VfD. Please wait at least several weeks before nominating this article again. If you have questions about the VfD process, please feel free to ask me. -- Essjay · Talk 04:16, August 15, 2005 (UTC)
[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Earth.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 11:51, 11 April 2006 (UTC)


She gone! Morton devonshire 01:19, 21 April 2006 (UTC)


Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Rotatinearth.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Admrb♉ltz (tcbpdm) 07:28, 20 April 2006 (UTC)


Doctor Who/Simpsons

[edit]

Hi, Aeon. I noticed that you removed the Fourth Doctor-Simpsons style from Doctor Who. However, you didn't use an edit summary, so other people have to guess why you did it. Do you think it's not fair use? If so, why not? Thanks. —Josiah Rowe (talkcontribs) 04:02, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Ah, thanks. I hadn't noticed that the image was deleted. That's a shame — I'll go see why it was. —Josiah Rowe (talkcontribs) 04:08, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
Glad to have you around! —Josiah Rowe (talkcontribs) 04:11, 21 April 2006 (UTC)


Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Brahmaputra River
Phillip Aspinall
USS (Star Trek)
Animetal
J-class starship
Jem'Hadar battleship
USS Lexington (Star Trek)
Imperial Star Ship
Starship prefixes (Star Trek)
D'Kora class starship
USS Farragut (NCC-1647)
USS Sovereign
Borg probe ship
Jem'Hadar attack ship
Suliban
Sidewalk Prophets
William Temple (archbishop)
Monkey Business (album)
Huff (TV series)
Cleanup
Practice squad
Enabling Act
Kaimingye germ weapon attack
Merge
Windows CE 5.0
Cardassian
Island of Time
Add Sources
Pagh (Star Trek)
Bellatrix Lestrange
Ian Levine
Wikify
Kobali
Jurassic Park Interactive
Polar motion
Expand
MPEG-4 Part 14
Carolyn Gage
Travis Mayweather

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 15:50, 29 April 2006 (UTC)


Re: Vandal

[edit]

I am not an admin, but if you have an issue with a vandal, and they have been appropriately warned, you can list them at WP:AIV with the following template: {{vandal|name}}. Be sure to give a reason why they should be blocked.--digital_me(Talk)(Contribs) 23:54, 30 April 2006 (UTC)


Your VandalProof Application

[edit]

Dear Aeon1006,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact with the new 1.1 version release it has even more power. As such we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that unfortunately you do not meet our 250 mainspace edit minimum. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again in the not too distant future. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof.

- Glen TC (Stollery) 04:08, 2 May 2006 (UTC)


My request

[edit]

Hi Aeon1006, Thanks for responding to my request. After looking into the situation with some images, I understand what went on, even though it was not explained to me by the other editor. I won't require any assistance at this time. --Fahrenheit451 15:38, 2 May 2006 (UTC)


*** Important - Your input requested ASAP ***

[edit]

Please see this Wikipedia:Deletion review#Rationales_to_impeach_George_W._Bush.

Merecat 00:30, 4 May 2006 (UTC)




monobook.js

[edit]

We both edited at the same article not too long ago, so I was checking you edits list. What is "monobook.js" and what is it used for? Sal 09:20, 4 May 2006 (UTC)


Attention!

[edit]

Replace {{QRVS}} with {{User QRVS}} (reason stated at WP:UB). The Republican 20:50, 6 May 2006 (UTC)


QRVS newsletter

[edit]

If you are looking at the newsletter from another talk page, join here.

The QRVS has been created.
A new logo has been created!
It has been advertised on the Community Portal.
A new userbox has been formed.

General Eisenhower (at war or at peace) 18:16, 13 May 2006 (UTC)


voting on xfDed articles

[edit]

G'day Aeon,

some editors on xfD subpages like to break down their opinions into the wiki equivalent of sound bites; that's what the bolded "recommendations" are for. It's a very popular habit, particularly for users who worry they may not be clear enough in prose. However, a bolded recommendation is not enough: even ten people who say "delete nn" on AfD can be "outvoted" by a single person who says "keep, he won the Nobel Prize for literature, has been on the front page of the /New York Times/ repeatedly since he became the President of the United States, and holds the world speed record for climbing Mount Everest naked while chewing tobacco". The important thing is the reasoning. Hope this clarifies, fuddlemark (befuddle me!) 05:26, 18 May 2006 (UTC)


California WikiProjects

[edit]

As a California Wikipedian, you may be interested in the California WikiProject (and/or one of its 'daughter' Wikiprojects on Southern California, Santa Barbara County, California State Highways and California County Routes). Please take a look at the WikiProject to see if there is anything that interests you. If you have any comments or questions, feel free to contact me. If enough people express an interest, it would also be very easy to create additional daughter WikiProjects, such as a Northern California WikiProject or a California Politics WikiProject.

It has also more than seven months since the 2nd Los Angeles area Wikipedia meetup ([ 26 September]] 2005), so it is time for another one. There have also been California meetups in San Diego (18 October 2005) and a very small one in Santa Barbara (8 April 2006. It's also about time that the Bay Area gets its first Meetup if anyone is willing to organize it. BlankVerse 05:54, 28 May 2006 (UTC)


Article formatting

[edit]

Dear Tropical cyclone editor,

As a member of the Tropical Cyclone Wikiproject, you are receiving this message to describe how you can better tropical cyclone articles. There are hundreds of tropical cyclone articles, though many of them are poorly organized and lacking in information. Using the existing featured articles as a guide line, here is the basic format for the ideal tropical cyclone article.

  1. Infobox- Whenever possible, the infobox should have a picture for the tropical cyclone. The picture can be any uploaded picture about the storm, though ideally it should be a satellite shot of the system. If that is not available, damage pictures, either during the storm or after the storm, are suitable. In the area that says Formed, indicate the date on which the storm first developed into a tropical depression. In the area that says Dissipated, indicate the date on which the storm lost its tropical characteristics. This includes when the storm became extratropical, or if it dissipated. If the storm dissipated and reformed, include the original start date and the final end date. Highest winds should be the local unit of measurement for speed (mph in non-metric countries, km/h in metric countries), with the other unit in parenthesis. The lowest pressure should be in mbars. Damages should, when available, be in the year of impact, then the present year. The unit of currency can be at your discretion, though typically it should be in USD. Fatalities indicate direct deaths first, then indirect deaths. Areas affected should only be major areas of impact. Specific islands or cities should only be mentioned if majority of the cyclone's effects occurred there.
  2. Intro- The intro for every article should be, at a minimum, 2 paragraphs. For more impacting hurricanes, it should be 3. The first should describe the storm in general, including a link to the seasonal article, its number in the season, and other statistics. The second should include a brief storm history, while the third should be impact.
  3. Storm history- The storm history should be a decent length, relatively proportional to the longevity of the storm. Generally speaking, the first paragraph should be the origins of the storm, leading to the system reaching tropical storm status. The second should be the storm reaching its peak. The third should be post-peak until landfall and dissipation. This section is very flexible, depending on meteorological conditions, but it should generally be around 3. Storm histories can be longer than three paragraphs, though they should be less than five. Anything more becomes excessive. Remember, all storm impacts, preparations, and records can go elsewhere. Additional pictures are useful here. If the picture in the infobox is of the storm at its peak, use a landfall picture in the storm history. If the picture in the infobox is of the storm at its landfall, use the peak. If the landfall is its peak, use a secondary peak, or even a random point in the storm's history.
  4. Preparations- The preparations section can be any length, depending on the amount of preparations taken by people for the storm. Hurricane watches and warnings need to be mentioned here, as well as the number of people evacuated from the coast. Include numbers of shelters, and other info you can find on how people prepared for the storm.
  5. Impact- For landfalling storms, the impact section should be the majority of the article. First, if the storm caused deaths in multiple areas, a death table would work well in the top level impact section. A paragraph of the general effects of the storm is also needed. After the intro paragraph, impact should be broken up by each major area. It depends on the information, but sections should be at least one paragraph, if not more. In the major impact areas, the first paragraph should be devoted to meteorological statistics, including rainfall totals, peak wind gusts on land, storm surge, wave heights, beach erosion, and tornadoes. The second should be actual damage. Possible additional paragraphs could be detailed information on crop damage or specifics. Death and damage tolls should be at the end. Pictures are needed, as well. Ideally, there would be at least one picture for each sub-section in the impact, though this sometimes can't happen. For storms that impact the United States or United States territories, this site can be used for rainfall data, including an image of rainfall totals.
  6. Aftermath- The aftermath section should describe foreign aid, national aid, reconstruction, short-term and long-term environmental effects, and disease. Also, the storm's retirement information, whether it happened or not, should be mentioned here.
  7. Records- This is optional, but can't hurt to be included.
  8. Other- The ideal article should have inline sourcing, with the {{cite web}} formatting being preferable. Always double check your writing and make sure it makes sense.

Good luck with future writing, and if you have a question about the above, don't hesitate to ask.

Hurricanehink (talk) 20:02, 30 May 2006 (UTC)


Mail-order bride

[edit]

I noticed you reverted another editor's nasty comments on the Mail-order bride talk page. While I agree that his comments were inappropriate, I think it's important that they stay on the page, since this was not vandalism, but part of an ongoing dispute with an uncooperative editor whom we've been trying to negotiate with for quite a while and the discussion needs to stay intact. It wasn't vandalism, either; Michael is quite sincere, as far as I can tell. I reverted your deletion. --Grace 03:16, 19 June 2006 (UTC)


DM

[edit]

hi could you please help me getting the code right for Diogo Briso Mainardi? the article linked

http://conjur.estadao.com.br/static/text/45378,1

gives his name as "DIOGO BRISO MAINARDI" at the bottom. thanks. Doidimais Brasil 03:33, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

i found a different link with the same info

http://www.viajus.com.br/noticias/viajus.php?pagina=noticias&fazer=mostrar&cod_news=7082589&editoria=portal-viars-direito

DISTRITO FEDERAL

     RELATOR: MIN. GILMAR MENDES
     REQUERENTE(S): DIOGO BRISO MAINARDI Doidimais Brasil 04:56, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Sorry for that. The only thing I ask, which I don´t know how to do myself and I failed at trying, is to code that link (which starts with viajus.com.br) as a source for the fact that Mainardi is named Briso. That´s it =). Like: Diogo Briso (little ble arrow) Mainardi. Thanks =) Doidimais Brasil 05:05, 19 June 2006 (UTC)


The Article as been blanked, can it be deleted since it is going to have consenus to delete? Aeon 23:07, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

The article was blanked by an anonymous IP address. If they wanted to register their opinion then they should have done so on the AfD rather than vandalise the article-in-question. I have reverted their vandalism and left a message to this effect on their Talk page. The AfD may be relisted because of a lack of votes or closed as a delete consensus by the closing admin. In either case, when the consensus is not a speedy delete, the process takes five Calendar days from the point of the AfD starting.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  05:43, 22 June 2006 (UTC)


User page vandalism

[edit]

Happy to help - cheers! --PeruvianLlama(spit) 06:43, 22 June 2006 (UTC)


Welcome to VandalProof!

[edit]

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Aeon1006! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Computerjoe's talk 18:11, 23 June 2006 (UTC)


Thanks

[edit]

...for the "last warning" warning. I just blocked 203.10.59.63 for massive reverting, edit-warring, and abuse. I presume you meant to give the warning to him. Antandrus (talk) 05:04, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

No problem! Happy editing, Antandrus (talk) 05:05, 24 June 2006 (UTC)


Thanks for Revert

[edit]

Thanks for reverting the spurious AfD tag on Higgins glass. I'm sure that any article which gets mentioned on the Main Page is a likely target for nonsense. Keep up the good work! :) --Doc Tropics 15:36, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

And I just noticed your stress-level rising. Anything I could help you with? --Doc Tropics 16:41, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

I found the AfD you mentioned. Can you say..."sockpuppets"? I threw in my own comment and I'll watch the discussion. Re the vandalism, I'd take that as a sign that you're on the right track. Keep your chin up :) --Doc Tropics 17:07, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #2

[edit]

The July issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list.--Nilfanion (talk) 00:51, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

I need an advocate.

[edit]

Dear Advocate,

I need an advocate. My user name is "Michael D. Wolok" Thank you.

Best regards, Michael

Greetings Earthling!

[edit]

Hi there,

I thank you very much for your help offer. I didn't know I had a talk page. I prefer communicating by email because I all ready have to many places to check for messages each day. Don't you. I don't know if I need to look here for your response, or my talk page or someother place else. If you respond to me you might send me an email letting me know where to find your reply. I apologize for being such a pain in the ass. But it really would help newcomers if there was a single Wikipedia FAQ that newcomers to Wikipedia couldn't miss. I think I am going to post this suggestion on Mr. Wales' talk page.

I have a lot of patience, a lot of time, and a lot of determination--a lot more than the average person. Wikipedia loses a lot of talent by being so esoteric.

Warmest and kindest regards, Michael D. Wolok

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #1

[edit]

Number 1, June 4, 2006

The Hurricane Herald

This is the monthly newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The Hurricane Herald aims to give a summary of the activities of the WikiProject over the past month and upcoming events over the next month. In addition monthly tropical cyclone activity will be summarized.

You have received this as you are a member of the WikiProject, please add your username in the appropriate section on the mailing list. If you do not add your name to that list, the WikiProject will assume you do not wish to receive future versions of The Hurricane Herald. Sorry if the newsletter breaks your talk page formatting.

Storm of the month

Typhoon Chanchu near its peak intensity
Typhoon Chanchu near its peak intensity
Typhoon Chanchu was the first typhoon and first super typhoon of the 2006 Pacific typhoon season. Forming on May 9 over the open western Pacific Ocean, Chanchu moved over the Philippines on the 11th. There, it dropped heavy rainfall, causing mudslides, crop damage, and 41 deaths. It moved into the South China Sea, where it rapidly strengthened to a super typhoon on May 14, one of only two super typhoons recorded in the sea. It turned to the north, weakened, and struck the Fujian province of China as a minimal typhoon on the 17th. The typhoon flooded 192 houses, while heavy rainfall caused deadly mudslides. In China, Chanchu caused at least 25 deaths and $480 million in damage (2006 USD). Elsewhere on its path, strong waves from the typhoon sank eleven Vietnamese ships, killing at least 44 people. In Taiwan, heavy rainfall killed two people, while in Japan, severe waves killed one person and injured another.

Other tropical cyclone activity

New articles and improvements wanted

Member of the month

This isn't the generic barnstar, we just don't have a WPTC star yet…
This isn't the generic barnstar, we just don't have a WPTC star yet…

The May member of the month is TitoXD. The WikiProject awards this to him for his brilliant work in improving articles. TitoXD joined the WikiProject in October just after it had been founded. Since then he has contributed substantially to many articles, for example Hurricane Nora (1997), which is currently a Featured Article Candidate. He is also actively involved in the assessment of articles and so helps to improve many more articles.

Explanation of content

If you have a topic which is not directly related to any specific article but is relevant to the WikiProject bring it up on the Newsletters talk page, and it will probably be included in a future edition of The Hurricane Herald.

These two sections are decided by the community on the newsletter's talk page:

  • Storm of the month: This is determined by a straw poll on the page. While all storms will be mentioned on the newsletter, the selected storm will be described in more detail.
  • Member of the month: Nominations are made on the talk page, voting is by secret ballot; read the talk page for details. The winner receives the WikiProject's barnstar (when we make it).

Main Page content

Storm article statistics

Grade April May June
FA 7 7 10
A 4 5 7
GA 0 3 5
B 62 66 82
Start 154 177 168
Stub 13 12 10
Total 240 263 282
percentage
Less than B
69.6 71.6 63.1

The assessment scale

  • The cyclone assessment scale is one of the bases of the new assessment scale for Version 1.0 of Wikipedia. It splits articles into several categories by quality, to identify which articles are "finished" and which ones still need to be improved.
  • The assessment scale by itself counts of several grades:
    • FA: reserved for articles that have been identified as featured content only.
    • A: this grade is given to articles that are considered ready for Wikipedia:peer review. The way to get this grade assigned to an article is by asking other cyclone editors at the WikiProject's assessment page.
    • GA: reserved for articles that have passed a good article nomination.
    • B: these articles are "halfway there", and have most of the details of a complete article, yet it still has significant gaps in its coverage.
    • Start: articles that fall in this category have a decent amount of content, yet it is weak in many areas. Be bold and feel free to improve them!
    • Stub: these articles are mostly placeholders, and may in some cases be useless for the reader. It needs a lot of work to be brought to A-Class level.
  • The way to use these assessments is by adding a parameter to the WikiProject template on the articles talk page ({{hurricane|class=B}} as an example). This feeds the article into a category which is read and parsed to create an assessment table, summary and log.


Uhhh...

[edit]

This was meant to be vandalized. I was making my picture look 3D-ish. Let me guess: still learning how to use Vandalproof? :) 69.145.123.171 Hello! Saturday, June 24, 2006, 04:38 (UTC)

Not a problem. Happens all the time, which is why I think I'll go without using Vandalproof... Too tough to learn. :) 69.145.123.171 Hello! Saturday, June 24, 2006, 04:41 (UTC)

AfD

[edit]

Technically? Yes... but it won't happen. The thing is that everyone is invited to participate in an AfD discussion... even anomomous IPs... even when they've show a kindergarten level ability to construct a logical argument. At the end of the AfD it is rather likely that all anon IPs and newly created users will be discounted. My guess though is that there are enough keeps from longer term users that at the end of the day, this will be another No Consensus. My advice is to just take a deep breath, stay WP:COOL, and if it is stressing you out, stay away from the AfD for a bit.--Isotope23 18:20, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Ah, yeah... userpage vandalism is the eventual outcome of doing anything controversial. I've gotten 6-7 vandalisms in my time here.--Isotope23 18:26, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
FYI - I've requested that someone (an Admin) look into the parade of sockpuppets. I think it's appropriate for the comments of confirmed sockpuppets to be struck out (stricken?). But now I'm going to follow Isotope's advice and stay away for awhile. Who needs this much silliness? --Doc Tropics 18:30, 30 June 2006 (UTC)


I'd propose a betting pool on how long they take to recreate the article (and have it deleted again)...but that would probably not be good wikiquette :) --Doc Tropics Message in a bottle 21:36, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Heh, heh...no bet. It is nice to see that reason can prevail over simple masses of opinion on WP. --Doc Tropics Message in a bottle 06:17, 5 July 2006 (UTC)