User talk:143.97.2.35

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

This host, ibv2.statoil.com (143.97.2.35), is registered to Statoil ASA and may be shared by many users of an enterprise network, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators monitoring this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Vandalism[edit]

It seems you, or someone else who shares your IP has vandalized the Nintendo 64 article. I'm rather new to this wiki thing, and the article on wiki vandalism has asked me to give you a warning, so this is your warning, I guess. SolarizeX 12:05, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Binder clip[edit]

You seem to have made a lot of contributions, and so I'm inclined to trust your edit to the binder clip article, but since your're anonymous I have to ask: are you certain that it was a Norwegian invention, or do you only know this from hearsay? Could you offer a reference so that interested parties can read further? Thanks, Joel 01:01, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joel, sorry for the late answer. This IP is a shared, Norwegian IP. I, for once, use it solemnly for interwikiing, but I am sure a whole lot of other people use it for other contributions (I know this IP is used to edit in the Norwegian wiki). The edits are usually OK in the Norwegian wiki, but I wouldn't trust them with my heart. I am sure you have either removed or confirmed the edit you referred to above. Sincerely User:Opus- (who doesn't care to log in just to interwiki) :) 15:52, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reply: I`m no interested in binder clips, nor do I know anything about them besides their practical and improvised uses. My IP is shared by hundreds, if not thousands.

SffWorld additions[edit]

Hi, thanks for your additions. I'd like to inform you that normally when someone adds mass links from the same website, it is considered spam and reverted. I apologize if this sounds harsh, but we have to be careful on Wikiopedia. Can you tell me why this wouldn't be the case? -Patstuart^{(talk)(contribs)} 21:46, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your Edits[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —Jake Wasdin 12:50, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thanks again. Adambro 15:24, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008[edit]

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Ethanol worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Bakabaka (talk) 11:18, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Landon1980 (talk) 03:13, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Wade Elliott has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Ndenison ^talk 13:56, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Nikola Tesla has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 01:13, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009[edit]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Death Magnetic, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Canniba loki 17:54, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page The Chevrons has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Katieh5584 (talk) 11:49, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added such as to the page Fantasy literature do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.-- The Red Pen of Doom 02:44, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to StatoilHydro operations by country, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: StatoilHydro operations by country was changed by 143.97.2.35 (u) (t) deleting 8948 characters on 2009-12-16T12:20:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 12:20, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but in this recent edit you removed a speedy deletion tag from Cirque brundini, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Shadowjams (talk) 09:01, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to List of oil refineries. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:04, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:uw-vandlism2|Swing bowling}} JamesBWatson (talk) 12:04, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sauda, you may be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:01, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oil glossary[edit]

Hi. Regarding your test at Category:Published_glossaries, you should try formatting the information similar to one of the other articles, e.g. National Information Assurance Glossary. Then submit your information to Wikipedia:Articles for creation. You can use the Wikipedia:Sandbox to experiment and draft. Hope that helps.

(Also, I recommend creating an account. It's more private than editing "anonymously" as that displays your IP address. Just a username and a password is required. No email, or anything else.). -- Quiddity (talk) 20:59, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Battles of Lexington and Concord. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Editing-related comments belong on talk page, not in article. Hertz1888 (talk) 14:58, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Longside with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ForeverDusk^☾ 02:17, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Michele Pazienza with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. My76Strat ^talk 00:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bordj Bounaama with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Anirudh Emani (talk) 08:30, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Helge Aske Almedal.
To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sincerely, Akjar13 (He's Gone Mental) 15:09, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JaeDyWolf ~ Baka-San (talk) 01:40, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nabucco pipeline, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Jakew (talk) 11:31, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012[edit]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Norwegian language. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. __meco (talk) 07:55, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Male contraceptive because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 13:53, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Avoided. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to CSR plc, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Avoided (talk) 15:22, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Helge Aske Almedal concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Helge Aske Almedal, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:48, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Mark Arsten. I noticed that you recently removed some content from FlyNordic, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:31, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vegard Leite concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vegard Leite, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:11, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vegard Leite[edit]

Hello 143.97.2.35. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Vegard Leite".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vegard Leite}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 20:03, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Ayub407. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 2015 Mina stampede, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ayub407^talk 16:53, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2016[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Koenraad Elst, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 19:50, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Naval Strike Missile, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 12:29, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm RHcosm. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Pho have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. RHcosm (talk) 09:02, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2018[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Aaron Conway. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 08:31, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Antipole[edit]

Hello, 143.97.2.35. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Antipole".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. DannyS712 (talk) 08:12, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019[edit]

Hello, I'm YorkshireLad. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Tiger team have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. YorkshireLad (talk) 16:53, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2019[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Tiger team, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CLCStudent (talk) 12:25, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2020[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Java Hurricane 13:25, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Ali Saïdi-Sief—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 14:24, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Antipole has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Antipole. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:30, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Antipole has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Antipole. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:06, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antipole (February 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft does not appear to indicate which of the musical notability criteria is satisfied. If at least one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page which criterion is met, and resubmit.

You may ask for advice about the musical notability criteria at the Teahouse.

This draft has been declined because of notability concerns. This draft should be resubmitted by addressing the notability concerns in AFC comments or on the talk page of the draft. Do not resubmit this draft without explaining how it satisfies a notability criterion. Do not simply add references, or make minor changes, without explaining how it satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the notability criteria at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Antipole and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Antipole, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:08, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 143.97.2.35! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:08, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021[edit]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Saharanpur district. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:54, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2022[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Dizadiz, you may be blocked from editing.
You have just made the same unsourced additions as a user please stop - Arjayay (talk) 11:58, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Dizadiz. - Arjayay (talk) 11:59, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jens Stoltenberg[edit]

Hi, this edit to Jens Stoltenberg in which you added "(OBSOLETE - IDA WOLDEN BACHE WILL TAKE OVER)" to a heading line broke the heading's formatting and is not consistent with formal encyclopaedic writing. If you want to add something to an article, don't dump it in all caps into that article. Best wishes, Solipsism 101 (talk) 14:50, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.