Jump to content

User talk:195.62.222.210

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 2015[edit]

Information icon

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to David Weir (Scottish footballer) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mattythewhite (talk) 08:17, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. screw you

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at David Weir (Scottish footballer). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 09:51, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at David Weir (Scottish footballer), you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: David Weir (Scottish footballer) was changed by 195.62.222.210 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.865981 on 2015-09-14T11:03:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:03, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at David Weir (Scottish footballer). . Oh, and no personal attacks. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 11:21, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Further to your previous warnings, I have reported you at WP:AIV. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 11:30, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at David Weir (Scottish footballer), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CAPTAIN RAJU (talk) 11:42, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:30, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of weapons in the American Civil War has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:18, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Acetobacter aceti has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 10:28, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2016[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Protist has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Protist was changed by 195.62.222.210 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.979257 on 2016-01-29T15:05:24+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:05, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Protist, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  —SMALLJIM  15:17, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Protist, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  —SMALLJIM  15:18, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Educational institution IP address
To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.

 —SMALLJIM  15:19, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bonfire Night have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 09:31, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bonfire Night. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Wikishovel (talk) 10:02, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Races and creatures in His Dark Materials, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Races and creatures in His Dark Materials was changed by 195.62.222.210 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.915567 on 2016-11-09T10:16:45+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:16, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Great chain of being has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:22, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Divine right of kings. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Divine right of kings was changed by 195.62.222.210 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.924664 on 2017-11-09T12:36:15+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:36, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Divine right of kings, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 16:09, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Divine right of kings. Shellwood (talk) 16:14, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Yesnaby—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 10:21, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Yesnaby. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:24, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Yesnaby, you may be blocked from editing. AngryHarpy‍talk 10:56, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

195.62.222.210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

We have recently changed domains and therefore have tightened security around this process, we need to update our page to make genuine changes about our info, this will be helpful to prospective parents and students

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 14:30, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

195.62.222.210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thank yu ufor the reviewing the request please see additional info as requested, The Block was in place to prevent damage to Wikipedia this has now been stopped on site and students are no longer able to access the site and all are monitored by our on-firewall, I do understand what the block was for originally hence why I haven't appealed it until I fully thought that we could rectify the issue to prevent any harmful edits being made, we have now done this. we are trying to make useful contributions to our own page to help us a business, we have no interest in vandalizing pages and have previously dealt with the students which had vandalized the page. we only want our Marketing department to have access to editing the page, so if we were to be unblocked then we would create an account purposely for staff, this would prevent vandalizing. as you can see we have been blocked extensively int he past and we have now reviewed our protocols and implemented fixes that would prevent any further vandalizing and also deal with the people who have been found to vandalize and make hurtful comments. 195.62.222.210 (talk) 13:15, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A huge concern I have is you admit you want to re-edit again to promote your business, which you admitted in your unblock request. Wikipedia is not for promotion, and it not designed to promote your school to "prospective parents". Also, there is no guarantee the security controls will work as well. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:15, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

195.62.222.210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry but i strongly disagree with this, is it okay for incorrect information to be posted on Wikipedia? because that's what is currently happening. We are trying to update our page to be factually correct because at the minute it isn't. i feel most schools/businesses use Wikipedia for the same reason equally promotion aside it is still publishing incorrect information on our establishment (which we are trying to resolve) We have extremely improved our security controls on this to prevent anything like this happening again - we have spent a fair amount of time investing into preventing this from occurring again. 195.62.222.210 (talk) 15:08, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

While Wikipedia strives to be accurate, it is not meant as a source for up to the minute current information, which you should provide on your own website. If a school representative wishes to propose changes(not edit the article itself), they may do so by requesting an account at WP:ACC(or creating one at their home) and then complying with WP:COI and WP:PAID. That's the path forward for you. 331dot (talk) 15:15, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'll add that Wikipedia primarily exists to summarize what independent reliable sources say about the school, not what it says about itself. There is a role for some primary source information, but it should be proposed as edit requests by a school representative/official. 331dot (talk) 15:17, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:195.62.222.210&oldid=1142809626"