User talk:216.81.94.68
 Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your , so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you. To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In the event of vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.
 Officials and network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. |
 | This IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges. Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block. |
Welcome!
[edit]
|
Conflict of Interest
[edit]
Hello, 216.81.81.80. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted.
⚠️Note: please ensure you are familiar with this guideline before you edit any articles about the United States government or any U.S. federal agencies. Thank you - wolf 23:35, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
| The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it. | |||
July 2010[edit]
--Ronz (talk) 15:47, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
October 2010[edit]
November 2011[edit]
Blocked for 31 hours[edit] To edit, please log in.
Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. July 2012[edit]
Blocked for 48 hours[edit]
Unblock request #1[edit] 216.81.94.68 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Why was I blocked? I have been posting in TALK while others have not. I posted verfiable referances, others have not. When I asked for others for support of referances for their changes, they provided none. I reached out to a Admin to lock Winshape till I could post in the Dispute resolution noticeboard. I also posted in the Dispute resolution noticeboard while others have not. I have been following Wikipedia rules yet I am blocked? Decline reason: I have blocked you and refuse to lift my block because you have continued to be uncivil, assume bad faith in others, and, last but nowhere near least, have been edit warring on WinShape Foundation for over a week, claiming there is a consensus in your favor when none such exists. You have been able to convince not one editor on the discussion page and have driven other good faith contributors away. I am leaving this block in place but welcome any fellow administrator to review my actions and the grounds on which it has been based. I have had no personal involvement with the article beyond receiving a notice from an involved contributor that I should review the behavioral situation as an impartial third party. Best, Blurpeace 13:01, 25 July 2012 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock request #2[edit]216.81.94.68 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: How was I edit waring but others not? Many of them were making changes, all I did was revert back to what it was before (which is based on referances, not POV). I even posted in TALK, many of them did not. I reached out to have other page blocked till more work in TALK or Board could be made, others did not. I even posted at the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Chickfila.2C_Winshape to bring this up, yet I am the ONLY one blocked??? 216.81.94.68 (talk) 13:59, 25 July 2012 (UTC) Decline reason: "How was I edit waring but others not?" you ask. Well, as you noted, it was only you on your side and several on the other side, all of whom were reverting because your changes lacked consensus, which is supported by multiple editors reverting. Plus you basically admitted you were going to do it your way despite an ongoing discussion of the issue. You, basically, were editing disruptively and tendentiously. — Daniel Case (talk) 15:03, 25 July 2012 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Unblock request #3[edit]216.81.94.68 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: What? Now you are just making stuff up. Look at the reverts and TALK page there were others who did not agree to change it from what the referances said. Also I never said I was "going to do it" my way in fact this is what i said in your link "I ahve reverted the last edits. All the referances state Anti-gay. Chaning to anything else, esp not in the referances is NPOV." please show me where I said anything close to your claims? In fact I was the only one in TALK, those changing it were not in this case. Also maybe you forgot but http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_democracy so having "several on the other side" does not make a consensus. So is this what Wikipedia has come to? Ignoring Wikipedia standards and rules and also having Admins makes claims that are not there, some may even say lie. AGAIN How was I edit waring but others not? Many of them were making changes, all I did was revert back to what it was before (which is based on referances, not POV). I even posted in TALK, many of them did not. I reached out to have other page blocked till more work in TALK or Board could be made, others did not. I even posted at the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Chickfila.2C_Winshape to bring this up, yet I am the ONLY one blocked??? 216.81.81.85 (talk) 16:48, 25 July 2012 (UTC) Decline reason: I can see that there is a good case for the changes you wish to make. However, instead of putting that case forward and being willing to answer other people's views in a civil and collaborative way, you expressed yourself aggressively, contemptuously dismissing other editors' attempts at constructive discussion. You now make unblock requests here in which you attack other editors. Wikipedia works by collaboration and cooperation, not by editors taking a battleground approach. Since your unblock requests are unconstructive, your talk page access will be removed for the remainder of the block, to avoid further waste of everybody's time. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:08, 26 July 2012 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Block increased to 72 hours[edit]
This is a fine illustration of how pointless and stupid blocking is. Still-24-45-42-125 (talk) 02:22, 27 July 2012 (UTC) August 2012[edit]
January 2013[edit]
January 2014[edit]
April 2014[edit]
April 2015[edit]
July 2015[edit]
January 2016[edit]
June 2016[edit]
July 2016[edit]
November 2016[edit]
November 2018[edit]
December 2018[edit]
December 2019[edit]
Your submission at Articles for creation: Horizontal segmentation (October 20)[edit]
Concern regarding Draft:Horizontal segmentation[edit]
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:04, 22 March 2021 (UTC) July 2022[edit]
|
September 2022
[edit] Hello, I'm Deltaspace42. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Palestinian Authority passport have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Deltaspace42 (talk) 19:05, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
October 2022
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to United States Marshals Service, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. - wolf 23:36, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |