User talk:24.44.196.20

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 24.44.196.20, is registered to Optimum Online and may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

July 2015

Hello, I'm KylieTastic. Your recent edit to the page Main Hoon Na appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 21:12, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered. I noticed that you recently removed some content from American and British English spelling differences without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DBaK (talk) 20:39, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please read and note this. It really does help the rest of us a LOT if you use an edit summary! Thanks.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! DBaK (talk) 20:44, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Thanks

Thanks very much for this. Best wishes DBaK (talk) 21:06, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Hello, I'm K6ka. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to The New Yorker because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --I am k6ka ^{Talk to me!} _{See what I have done} 00:46, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The New Yorker. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --I am k6ka ^{Talk to me!} _{See what I have done} 00:47, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. MopSeeker Fox Three! 00:48, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The New Yorker. --I am k6ka ^{Talk to me!} _{See what I have done} 00:51, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 02:00, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.44.196.20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Insert your reason to be unblocked here

Decline reason:

No unblock reason provided. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:27, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reference errors on 26 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Nanga Punga Dost page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hello, I'm Denisarona. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Humpty Sharma Ki Dulhania without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 21:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Illegal immigration to the United States, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(talk) 20:23, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to 🍜, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~ NottNott talk|contrib 20:41, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2015

Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Gauri Khan— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(talk) 20:56, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gauri Khan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(talk) 21:04, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to List of words having different meanings in American and British English: M–Z— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:21, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Hate Story 3, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 03:20, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Hate Story 3. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Diff: [1] I'm going to explain this to you in a way that I hope makes sense: Wikipedia is not interested in editors' personal interpretations. Just because a song sounds like another song to you, does not mean that it is a copy of the other. That comparison, like all other comparisons, needs to come from reliable published sources. If there was a copyright suit over the similarity, and if a judge said "it's a copy", then we could include it. If critics said "song A sounds like a copy of song B", then we could say "critics noted a strong similarity between song A and song B". However, you cannot add "this is a copy" to an encyclopedia, just like you can't add "Madhuri Dixit is beautiful" to an encyclopedia. These are your opinions, and they constitute original research. Please do not resubmit this content again without ample sources from reliable publications. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:31, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Hate Story 3. Jim1138 (talk) 04:05, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:34, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.44.196.20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Nothing was disruptive now

Decline reason:

You were warned multiple times to stop, and you persisted. If you resume with the same crap after the expiration of this block, your next block will be for a longer duration. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 03:35, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.44.196.20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

At the last moment, I followed the message by Cyphoidbomb (talk) saying that if critics said "song A sounds like a copy of song B", then we could say "critics noted a strong similarity between song A and song B".

Decline reason:

This is not an unblock request - if you wish to contact Cyphoidbomb, you'll need to go to their talk page. At any rate, the block has expired. —DoRD (talk) 14:09, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The IP editor either doesn't understand that making the statement without supporting the statement is a useless contribution, or they're deliberately being disruptive. Neither scenario is a good one. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:41, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My reverts...

Dang! You're absolutely right! I completely misread your edits. sorry about that! I've undone my reverts. —Wasell^(T) 19:36, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Bhola Bhala

Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edits because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Dcirovic (talk) 21:41, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Please do not change all settings on the internet. 24.44.196.20 (talk) 04:17, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. livelikemusic talk! 04:02, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 23:49, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2016

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to B. S. Sahay, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. (Massive removal of URLs) --Floatjon (talk) 16:52, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Floatjon: I explained clearly in the edit summary. Did you not read this? – "Fix incorrect ref formatting – You can help!" 24.44.196.20 (talk) 01:34, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see that -- but your fix was entirely wrong. While it stopped the error message, it deleted a large amount of useful data and rendered several references useless.--Floatjon (talk) 23:34, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 02:31, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.44.196.20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I only try to fix reference errors in pages.

Decline reason:

It looks to me like you were just removing references, not fixing them. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:59, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.