User talk:64.121.83.151

July 2014

Hello, I'm Jetstreamer. Your recent edit to the page LGBT rights in Argentina appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 23:55, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to LGBT rights in Saudi Arabia may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

uncommon to see [[heterosexual]] men seemingly expressing affection toward each other in public (e.g., kissing on the cheeks or holding hands as a social custom and friendship in parts of the

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:05, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:27, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one month for block evasion (User:Jacobkennedy). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 15:44, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

64.121.83.151 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I never evaded anything. Why am I being accused of this? 64.121.83.151 (talk) 16:17, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Until you clear up the blocks on your account, you may not edit as an IP. This is considered block evasion. Kuru (talk) 16:33, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Are you kidding? Can you explain this: "But if you still think I should be banned..."? This from your user page. You even requested an unblock request which speaks against you even more. AcidSnow (talk)

How does it speak against me? I wanted to be unblocked and I think it's your fault that I'm banned.

Are you reading anything that is sent to you? You have been socking before and after your ban; which you still claim not to be doing. Your ban has been very helpful for the Wikipedia community. Why? Because you were edit warring, making personal attacks, and being plain disruptive. Your block had nothing to do with me, but rather entirely brought upon yourself and anyone can see that.AcidSnow (talk) 17:15, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I noticed that you recently removed some content from LGBT in the Middle East with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 23:12, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"If you're going to revert my revision Acidsnow learn to spell first", what are you taking about? Both "reverted" and "sock" are spelled correctly so what did I spell wrong? Maybe you should learn how to form a proper sentence before you start making a fool of yourself. While your at it, please learn not to be disruptive. AcidSnow (talk) 18:59, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Hello, I'm Randykitty. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Culture of Saudi Arabia because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Randykitty (talk) 20:10, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at LGBT rights in Saudi Arabia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in loss of editing privileges. Randykitty (talk) 20:29, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to LGBT rights in Libya. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ― Padenton|✉ 21:18, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to LGBT rights in Libya. Amaury (talk) 21:52, 29 March 2015 (UTC) How is it vandalism? I sourced my info?[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:50, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page LGBT in the Middle East has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. In addition to "Fixing grammar" the edit also removed two references without explanation Kiore (talk) 07:17, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Strange message on my talk page. Thank you.} --Guy Macon (talk) 10:55, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OUTING issue

Please don't ask people to contact named friends of yours, contacting people outside of Wikipedia can reveal their real names.

Because some people receive death threats or legal threats over content on wikipedia, Wikipedia has policies against revealing the private details of editors. See WP:OUTING

I'm going to remove the name of your friend, and your request to contact her on twitter.

-- Aronzak (talk) 11:32, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 00:33, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Jacobkennedy

blocked, Jacobkennedy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aronzak (talk • contribs) 12:45, 2 May 2015 (UTC) How do I unblock myself?[reply]

June 2016

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Societal attitudes toward homosexuality with this edit, without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 04:16, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 19th GLAAD Media Awards with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 04:19, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to 19th GLAAD Media Awards with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 04:23, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't disruptive I gave a reason why I removed it this time. What's the issue with that? 64.121.83.151 (talk) 04:24, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Removed article with pro-LGBT bias" That's a reason? More like censorship to me. Jim1138 (talk) 04:25, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sources should be neutral under Wikipedia:Neutral point of view right? That article has a pro-LGBT perspective. Plus the interviews that cannot be confirmed or denied as fact unless you track them all down and verify with them they are really talked to Nadya Labi so it goes against Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources and Wikipedia:No original research. The ability of its content being believable and its validity is sketchy at best. 64.121.83.151 (talk) 04:34, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you read wp:neutral point of view. It is not what you think it means. Jim1138 (talk) 04:43, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Even if it doesn't go against that policy of neutrality it's still not verifiable. 64.121.83.151 (talk) 04:45, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 05:17, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Please seek unblock from your original account. Tiderolls 13:11, 13 June 2016 (UTC) Another whole year :([reply]

June 2017 Comment

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to LGBT culture in India, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. NZ Footballs Conscience^(talk) 03:06, 26 June 2017 (UTC) Hello please tell my why it is an unconstructive edit. The source is a gay blogger's opinion, not facts which makes that source biased and unfactual. Also, according to the other source LGBT activity is subject to up to life in prison not 10 years in jail.64.121.83.151 (talk) 03:10, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes and I have fixed some wording, but have done that without deleting other information that is relevant. NZ Footballs Conscience^(talk) 03:13, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

see the issue with those sources on the page I fear it might be pro-biased, do you have any neutral sources that mention large gay communities in India, if you do please replace your sources with those more reputable, more neutral sources and then it will be left alone 64.121.83.151 (talk) 03:17, 26 June 2017 (UTC) I can remove them, as both sources are dead links[reply]

June 2017

Please seek unblock from your original account. Tiderolls 14:05, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cree_Summer

@NZFC: I can't edit due to my current ban but I would like to suggest that you add this source http://sain.scaa.sk.ca/items/wedding-of-don-francks-and-lili-clark-on-the-red-pheasant-first-nation-2 to the Cree Summer page. This source backs noting African descent from her mother's side in her personal section, along with tags noting actress of African-American descent and voice actress of African American descent. I think it will be beneficial to the page but I need someone to add that for me. 64.121.83.151 (talk) 08:10, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hello, I'm Patient Zero. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to LGBT rights in North Korea—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Patient Zero^talk 21:32, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 years for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 16:52, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

64.121.83.151 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There is no ban evasion here. I waited out my time, returned when my ip was unblocked and you unfairly unblocked me when I have no accounts I'm using and the only ban on the ip ended.64.121.83.151 (talk) 21:48, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"No accounts you're using" because you, the person associated with the account User:Jacobkennedy, was blocked in 2014, and has not been unblocked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 22:41, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"No accounts I'm using" is very strange wording. Please specifically list all of the accounts you have ever used. --Yamla (talk) 22:05, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.