User talk:Akshadev/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Akshadev! Your additions to Draft:Rakuten Mobile have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 00:57, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Your signature

Hi Akshadev, I noticed that you recently copied the formatting of my signature to yours, copying not only colours, shading and typeface, but even macrons over vowels. The similarity may be confusing to other editors and may run afoul of WP:SIGFORGE. Would you mind using different sig formatting? Thank you. — kashmīrī ^TALK 15:42, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

 Done - Sorry for the inconvenience! I still have a lot to learn about Wikipedia's policies. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 💬 16:11, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Yeah, there's a good deal of them. Thanks and good luck! — kashmīrī ^TALK 16:52, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

@Kashmiri: sorry to bother you again! I didn't find anything useful at WP:CUSTOMSIG regarding how to make signatures cool like yours so how do we do that? I mean can anyone do it for me! If yes then who? Again, sorry I'm bothering you! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 💬 04:24, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

It's basic CSS, you can learn it e.g. from here. — kashmīrī ^TALK 06:39, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Beadrill

The following is a closed discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page.

I'm archiving this discussion as a reminder of my inappropriate actions at this RM discussion and this discussion. I acknowledge that my actions were inappropriate and absolutely unacceptable, but all those things are past now. I will prove that I'm not an abusive editor and I never will be. — AKSHADÉV™ 💬 06:19, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

---

Be aware, Beadrill has claimed over at User talk:Beadrill that they are a different person than you but had access to your account. If accurate, that would mean you allowed your account to be compromised and as per WP:COMPROMISED, we would need to indefinitely block this account. --Yamla (talk) 10:30, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

I did not allowed anyone anything. That Beadrill id you're talking about was created by me (The Ancestor is also mine). I was leading those two accounts. It was all my fault and I paid for it (the two week ban by 'user Spicy'). Now I've nothing to do with those two accounts anymore because now I know what's right and what's not. Since then, I've never abused multiple accounts or any other Wikipedia policy (intentionally) that could lead my account to get blocked. — AKSHADÉV™ 💬 11:02, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

@Yamla Why did you block me? Go check my contribution history and tell me if I've violated any policy since that RM incident. I like editing Wikipedia, please don't take away my right just like that. — AKSHADÉV™ 💬 11:15, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

I did not block you. See your block log where you can see this account is not directly blocked and was never blocked by me. I will note that your statement here directly contradicts the statement over at User talk:Beadrill, though. --Yamla (talk) 11:29, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

@Spicy Why now! — AKSHADÉV™ 💬 11:38, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Here, you claim only you controlled all three accounts. Why, then, did you lie over at User talk:Beadrill while attempting to get it unblocked? Why bother trying to get that account unblocked at all? --Yamla (talk) 11:46, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

My bad! Sorry for being irresponsible. Now I seriously have nothing to do with those accounts. — AKSHADÉV™ 💬 11:54, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

So, to be clear, you are admitting that you lied over at User talk:Beadrill while attempting to get that account unblocked? --Yamla (talk) 11:55, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Yes, I did. I'm sorry. — AKSHADÉV™ 💬 12:03, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

This reflects really badly on you. You attempted to mislead us and attempted to resume violating WP:SOCK. You are incredibly close to an indefinite block; any further bad behaviour, including inappropriate edits, will result in an indefinite block. Don't try to pull this garbage again. --Yamla (talk) 12:04, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

The only thing is bothering me is that message on those userpages: “This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of Akshadev (talk · contribs · logs)”. I don't want to be called a Sockmaster. Can those accounts be deleted permanently or something? — AKSHADÉV™ 💬 12:19, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

No, accounts cannot be deleted. And you are an abusive sockmaster. I'm afraid the user pages on those accounts will continue to reflect your inappropriate actions here on Wikipedia. --Yamla (talk) 12:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

I was. I'm not now, and my intentions were never wrong. That was a mistake and it is all over now. Anyway I don't need to justify myself because I know what I am :), have a good day! — AKSHADÉV™ 💬 12:33, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

You literally tried to be today. --Yamla (talk) 12:40, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

I'm taking an arrow straight to my chest for that! — AKSHADÉV™ 💬 12:45, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

August 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:East Bengal Club, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. It's up to editors if they want to use the "support"/"oppose" formatting, and their comments are clear enough anyway. And changing the hyphen style on other people's comments is pointless too Joseph2302 (talk) 07:56, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

@Joseph2302: Have a look at this and this – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 💬 08:03, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Leave the same message at those users talk pages as you leaved on mine. Also, your point noted. Cheers! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 💬 08:04, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Also, do notify me (here) when you're done with the suggestions stuff (on those users talk pages). – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 💬 08:15, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

I'm not involved in that discussion, but the point is still relevant. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:22, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Exactly, and being a responsible editor, you should get involved if the Wikipedia guidelines are being compromised by anyone. because the rules are made for everyone, right! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 💬 08:27, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

SCE-200

Hi. I've been watching what seems to have turned into an edit war between you and one or two other editors on this article. I'm going to suggest that you start a discussion on the talk page about that contentious edit, rather than continue to play tug-of-war with the contested statement. Joyous! Noise! 04:01, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

 Done – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 💬 04:16, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! Joyous! Noise! 04:24, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

You don't have to mention it. Have a good day! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 💬 04:26, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Warning and reporting an IP

@Lectonar: Sorry to bother you but would you mind explaining me that procedure again like you did at the requests for page protection. It would be a very big help for me to deal with IP vandals. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 💬 07:53, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Don't worry, Wikipedia has a steep learning curve. I will leave this here for starters: Help:Simple guide to vandalism cleanup and Wikipedia:Vandalism. If you've got a quiet minute, read it thoroughly, especially in regard to what constitutes vandalism. Keep in mind that other people having a different opinion than yourself mustn't necessarily mean they are vandals. Regards. Lectonar (talk) 08:44, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for your help sir/madam, have a great time! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 💬 08:49, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

You may use WP:Twinkle for faster responses. Happy editing. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:35, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Chandrayaan-6

Can you explain why did you remove rocket name from Chandrayaan-6 even when it was cited by you Mr Unknown233 (talk) 07:43, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Mr Unknown233: I'm assuming you're talking about this. There is still a lot of time in the 'Chandrayaan-6' mission and as of now, there is no concrete information about the mission in the public domain, i.e. when will it launch or which rocket is going to carryout the mission. And this source has no information related to the mission either. That's why I thought it appropriate to remove the rocket info. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 💬 08:20, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Ways to improve Venus Orbiter Mission

Hello, Akshadev,

Thank you for creating Venus Orbiter Mission.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please run a c/e and change the phrasing to avoid copyvio.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|The Herald}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:29, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Discussion closing

Since, you withdraw the proposal, you can close the discussion following any of the closing procedure here WP:CLOSE. Drat8sub (talk) 06:06, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

 Done – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 💬 06:30, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Nothing in WP:CLOSE applies. It massively fails WP:WHENCLOSE, as there isn't a clear consensus, the discussion isn't stable (people are still giving opinions, and you changing your mind doesn't make it a consensus), and When further contributions are unlikely to be helpful is not true either. If you're allowed to suddenly change your mind, other people are definitely allowed to add/change their opinion. Drat8sub you should not be recommending a close in this case. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:18, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Joseph, the close is not premature at all. It has been there for more than 2 weeks, and already a conclusion was drawn that the article should be structured well, only thing changed here is not splitting. It's stable as seems for discussion. I don't see any counter argument from the two users who just said "per nomination". Three of the users including me and the nominator Akshadev changed opinion on the subject seeing the valid argument given by ArnabSaha at EB talk page and an edit summary by another user. Two of users are discussing a different topic that was already dicussed before and concluded. There are 5-6 users given their reason clearly for not splitting, if that's not consensus what esle. But if you insist, we can keep the discussion open for few more days to see if any other arguments by other users. Drat8sub (talk) 08:43, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

There is not a clear consensus in my opinion, especially when you remove a couple of single-purpose accounts with poor arguments like search engine optimisation. Also, best for someone uninvolved with the discussion to close it if it does need closing, as per WP:NACINV/WP:INVOLVED: In general, editors should not act as administrators in disputes in which they have been involved.. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:49, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Drat8sub and Akshadev- do not try and close this again, if you do, I will seek administrative action at WP:ANI. This comment by Drat8sub seems like Wikipedia:Tag teaming to me, to get the outcome that you (currently) support. One person opposes the move, and then tells someone else to withdraw it, even though there's some clear support for the split. Totally inappropriate behaviour. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:29, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

I would only ask you to stay civil, not to false accuse other fellow editors of tag teaming and threatening them with ANI action. Drat8sub (talk) 09:26, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

I said "it looks like"- if that wasn't the intention, then I apologise. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:26, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Clearly that wasn't the intention. You often "look too far away" sometimes. I humbly request you to add some sincerity in your vision. Have a good time! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 💬 10:32, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Important notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 11:27, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

@Aman.kumar.goel: I have no interest in topics such as India, Pakistan and Afghanistan, so what is this notice about and what for? — 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 💬 11:38, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Your edits about Chandrayaan 3, ISRO, etc. are related to "India" though. Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 11:39, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Yeah but what is the reason of this notice I've got? — 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 💬 11:41, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

I am just making you aware that extra care is needed when editing these subjects. They are controversial and any admin can sanction if evidence of misconduct has been discovered. Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 11:59, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Varanasi

Please note that when you make a change in a longstanding version of an article, as you did at Varanasi, especially in the lead or info box, and the edit is reverted, you need to open a thread on the talk page of that article, i.e. in that instance, Talk:Varanasi, explain what you were attempting to do, to add some reliable sources that back up your edit and the wait for other editors to respond and for a new consensus to emerge. This can take several days, a week, or even more time. When a new consensus phrasing emerges, you may add it to the article, but not before. Please read WP:ONUS, which is Wikipedia policy and also WP:BRD, which is good advice for interaction. Best regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 04:18, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for your valuable advice. Regards! — 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 💬 04:46, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Split??

You have closed the discussion as split, which should not be, there was no new comment after given more than one month. Can you explain? Drat8sub (talk) 05:45, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

The proposed article (Mohun Bagan Super Giant) has already been replaced with the main article Mohun Bagan AC (at ISL page), and I did not find it necessary to keep the split discussion open, therefore I closed the discussion. You can reopen it if necessary. Regards. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 06:12, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Fine, though my initial suggestion was that only. I have restructured the Mohun Bagan SG article to some extent, though there needs more to revamp but the kindly, don't keep the Mohun Bagan AC page the exact replica of the MBSG article, I have already mentioned what to add in the MBAC article in my first comment in the discussion, since you split the article, you must do that too, otherwise the articles will confuse the readers. Thank you. Drat8sub (talk) 06:41, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

I didn't split the article, some other editor must have done it. I only proposed the split. Although, we all can/will contribute to the article time to time to make it convenient to the readers. Thank you. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 06:47, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Oh I thought you did, I need to open an ANI report, this is utterly disgusting splitting even before discussion was concluded and that too when the user Anjum was already been addressed that there is a discussion going on and they should participate multiple times by @Mariner566: and @TheWikiholic:. This is a wastage of time if the discussion has no value. I have clearly suggested that if the spit being made it should be made correctly otherwise the said confusion will continue for endless time. Drat8sub (talk) 07:03, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Please do participate in the ANI, your thoughts will be important in that, first the new article creation discussion, then the merger discussion and now the split discussion, suddenly someone split without addressing it anyone. I have not seen such things before here. Drat8sub (talk) 07:10, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

I also thought that the split discussion had no clear consensus yet, the MBSG article has replaced the main article (Mohun Bagan AC), it looked kinda wierd but still I closed the discussion because the split action was already done. And about the participation in ANI discussion, I certainly will. But where is that discussion going on? – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 07:23, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

I will need time to make the report, because the report needs to include points from previous discussions too. Week or so will need. Drat8sub (talk) 07:29, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Alright then. Btw, have I done anything I shouldn't have done (like closing the split discussion)? If so then it was not done intentionally. I did what I thought would be right to do. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 07:35, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2024–25 Inter Kashi FC season

The article 2024–25 Inter Kashi FC season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Way premature, WP:CRYSTAL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 15:57, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2031 AFC Asian Cup (December 1)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The comment left by Zoglophie was: Read WP:CRYSTAL & WP:TOOSOON.

zoglophie^•talk• 09:29, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Akshadev! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! zoglophie•talk• 09:29, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vatika FC (December 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aviram7 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vatika FC and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 05:27, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vatika FC (December 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vatika FC and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:03, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

India map

Hello. You're quite right to say that India3 shows the disputed areas in a different way. It does: it specifically gives the impression that India controls them and that they are a de facto part of the country. They're not in general. That's why India is a better map - any use of India3 in this sort of context suggests that there may be the possibility that a political point is being made by its use, specifically about the border between India and Pakistan.

You need to be aware that WP:CTOP applies here - specifically because this is dealing with India's borders. You already have that templated on your talk page. Yet it's easily arguable that you've made a contentious edit, I've reverted it and then you're immediately reverted by edit with a suggestion that I'm edit warring. You were in a discussion about CTOP on 27 August this year if you need to go back and check your talk page. I can't find any edits by either of your sock puppets from earlier in the year that they were involved in similar editing, so I'm prepared, at the moment, to give you the opportunity to deal with this yourself. But please do deal with it. Blue Square Thing (talk) 14:16, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

The main article (Indian Premier League) is using the same map, that's why I decided to replace the India maps with India3 in all the season articles. But if it concerns the WP:CTOP then I'll replace the maps again. You could've left this message earlier though, rather than reverting my edits. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 14:27, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

I imagine we were both simply editing too quickly. It's interesting about the main article map, I came across a template earlier than used India3, I wonder if it's that - I'll pop over and change it now. And, yes, I think it would probably be better all-round if you moved things back to the India map; it'll save a lot of fuss and bother I imagine. I'll need to do some digging about the India3 one and where it's used actually. Thanks. Blue Square Thing (talk) 16:48, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Those maps

So i think I got all of them - let me know if I missed any. I was able to remove quite a lot of redundancy and odd formatting along the way which was a definite bonus. Blue Square Thing (talk) 16:41, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Pakistan national football team

You are the one clearly in edit war with me over this nonsensical issue. PFF.com.pk is the official website of PFF[1], I don't understand what's the point of contention here. WP:ELYES

any further revert will be reported to ANI. War Wounded (talk) 14:30, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Do whatever you can. I'm not afraid of ANI. Give this cheap threat to someone else, not me. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 02:31, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Ekana Football Stadium moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ekana Football Stadium. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:36, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

I've resubmitted. I could only find three references at the moment. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 11:09, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ekana Football Stadium has been accepted

Ekana Football Stadium, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 15:10, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear editor, thanks a lot. I appreciate your work. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 15:13, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Seasonal greetings!!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024!

Hello Akshadev, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Happy editing, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:51, 25 December 2023 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:51, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Merry Christmas The Herald! Thank you for this greetings. I wish that the New Year 2024 brings a lot of good, fun and happiness for you too. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 14:04, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Image deletion

Please use WP:image deletion. GiantSnowman 16:29, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

 Done – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 06:33, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Communication needed regarding SVG logos!

Hello Akshadev! You doing some nice works predominantly within Indian-football-related articles, and it's great to go through all the newly updated SVG logos — but — within all the wiki pages of the logos, links (official website/or AIFF club profile) are missing in "source" section, in which links are highly needed — otherwise those can be removed permanently with the failure due to copyright claims. If you get free time, please add them in all clubs' svg page, by going through what I've added recently within "Mohammedan SC (Kolkata).svg", here: Difference summary! Keep going, Regards :) Billjones94 (talk) 08:50, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Hey there! Thank you for appreciating my work. I have not added those logo(s) you are talking about, still, I'll try to follow your suggestions at my very best. Regards! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 08:57, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Svg logo

Hello @Indfootball editor: Ozone FC is using outdated png image, would mind updating that as well? – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 07:22, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Also for

• Minerva Academy FC
• Denzong Boys FC
• Chennai City FC
• Sreebhumi FC
• FC Green Valley
• Simla Youngs FC
• Eagles FC
• Madan Maharaj FC
• Bengal Mumbai FC
• FC Pune City
• Pune FC
• Mumbai FC
• Bharat FC
• Mumbai Tigers FC
• KRYPHSA FC
• Royal Wahingdoh FC
• Chanmari FC
• Luangmual FC
• Fateh Hyderabad AFC

This is quite a lot to ask for. Happy editing. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 07:50, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

okay, thanks for notifying Indfootball editor (talk) 10:01, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

@Indfootball editor, Also for Gauhati Town Club. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 11:10, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

@Indfootball editor: two more clubs:–

• Army Red (football team)
• Army Green (football team)

happy editing! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 14:48, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

@Indfootball editor: svg logo for Punjab State Super League. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 11:36, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy New Year 2024!🥳

Happy New Year!

Hello Akshadev: Thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia, and have a great New Year! Cheers, ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 16:21, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, and Happy New Year to you too and every single member of your family and friends. Stay healthy and safe. Regards! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 16:24, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year snowman}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.

Happy New Year, Akshadev!

Happy New Year!

Akshadev,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 20:32, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks Abishe! Happy New Year to you too and every single member of your family and friends. Stay healthy and safe. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 02:46, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 20:32, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Logo Sources

Regarding the Logo Sources. I checked @Billjones94 commenting about SVG logos uploaded without given source. Could you @Akshadev@Billjones94 both have look on that. if source/url is missed could you please help to add those. otherwise it will be a nightmare if updated logos are removed Indfootball editor (talk) 08:37, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

 Sure! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 08:47, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

It would take some time (much longer) though and cannot be done by one person! You also have to help. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 09:07, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

yes offcourse.

just wanted to communicate to you if you find any svg logo uploaded, that has empty 'Source', requesting to add a source. to avoid future deletion as @Billjones94 did for articles like Punjab FC logo Indfootball editor (talk) 09:27, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

@Indfootball editor: svg logo for ATK. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 13:26, 1 January 2024 (UTC)