User talk:Armaghan Muawiyah

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Armaghan Muawiyah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Greetings! My account was blocked due to a misunderstanding. I had requested to lower the protection for Dushyant Kapoor's page, but I used the word "My Client", and Wikipedia admins think that I am getting paid to create article on Wikipedia and I haven't disclosed it. Truth is I don't created Dushyant Kapoor's page nor I'm getting paid, if I really did I already mentioned it as per Wikipedia policy. Kindly consider my request and unblock me so that I can contribute to Wikipedia as a volunteer as I'm doing since 2017. I think it's my honor to be a Wikipedia Extended Confirmed User. I don't want to lose my account.Armaghan Muawiyah (talk) 19:15, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Daniel Case (talk) 05:07, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Armaghan Muawiyah, I wish you had chosen to make another unblock request rather than to create sockpuppets. It will now be much more complicated to become unblocked. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:30, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Zakir Naik has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Zakir Naik was changed by Armaghan Muawiyah (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.872955 on 2017-10-11T05:11:47+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:11, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zakir Naik also gives lectures in Urdu. Peace TV Urdu is the biggest source of my claim.

Armaghan Muawiyah (talk) 07:33, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

English[edit]

Hi there, re: this edit, I'm curious why you would create a link to English? Do you not know what English is? Do you suppose that our readers at the English Wikipedia may not know what English is? Will they be curious enough to click? Rhetorical questions. Please don't provide Wikilinks for common words/concepts. Please see WP:OVERLINK. Links compete for reader attention, so when we have useless ones, it just makes it less likely that they'll click on other links. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:25, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Qamar Iqbal Sufi[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Qamar Iqbal Sufi, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:11, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Qyamat Iqbal Sufi is one of the greatest spiritual person in Pakistan. I think people wants to know about him, that's why I created this page. I am very surprised by your nomination. Armaghan Muawiyah (talk) 15:17, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Qamar Iqbal Sufi[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Qamar Iqbal Sufi, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:14, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017[edit]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Qamar Iqbal Sufi, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- There'sNoTime ^{(to explain)} 17:17, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of cities in Pakistan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kurram (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 22[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited University of Chakwal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Computer Sciences (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello Armaghan Muawiyah, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to University of Chakwal have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:40, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of highest-grossing Indian films in overseas markets, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2.0 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:40, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:UN Population[edit]

I'm curious why you replaced this template in articles instead of updating the source directly. I would've thought that updating the template would be easier. Anyway, make sure you don't leave behind the {{ and }}, like in this footnote, which should be removed since they're unnecessary and they break the links. Wikiacc (¶) 21:27, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

By mistake. Just a human error Armaghan Muawiyah (talk) 21:33, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do not copy plot summaries from external websites[edit]

Your addition to The Donkey King has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. MER-C 18:45, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK I will keep it in my mind. Thanks Armaghan Muawiyah (talk) 20:04, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removed spam message[edit]

Hi. Unfortunately, the message posted to your talk page was not valid, but part of a campaign of page defacement by an anonymous editor: please ignore it. -- The Anome (talk) 06:49, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK Thanks Armaghan Muawiyah (talk) 06:52, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 9[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Acorn Electron games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romik (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Industrias Eduardo Sal-Lari moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Industrias Eduardo Sal-Lari, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:56, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 28[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aamir Liaquat Hussain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irfan Khan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mortimer Chambers moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Mortimer Chambers, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:38, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Industrias Eduardo Sal-Lari[edit]

Hello, Armaghan Muawiyah. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Industrias Eduardo Sal-Lari, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:04, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 10[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Barbie as the Princess and the Pauper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:50, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mortimer Chambers[edit]

Hello, Armaghan Muawiyah. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mortimer Chambers, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of Pink Panther games[edit]

Hello, Armaghan Muawiyah. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Pink Panther games, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Alag, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The sources that you added do not support your claim about the film being based on Powder. As discussed at WT:FILM, the most that can be said of the source is that a reviewer compares the two films. DonIago (talk) 00:20, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you sir for your time and pointing out my mistake. Actually Bollywood movies do make films based on movies of World cinemas and usually they don't give credit or acknowledge it. Armaghan Muawiyah (talk) 06:24, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that, but we need a reliable source to make the claim before we can include it, and a reviewer simply noting similarities doesn't hit that threshold. Cheers. DonIago (talk) 13:01, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sir thanks for the advice. I will try to find reliable resource. Armaghan Muawiyah (talk) 19:10, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Industrias Eduardo Sal-Lari[edit]

Hello, Armaghan Muawiyah. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Industrias Eduardo Sal-Lari".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:18, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re: "My client"[edit]

Hello Armaghan Muawiyah. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Special:Diff/1049094654, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Armaghan Muawiyah. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Armaghan Muawiyah|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. —Cryptic 18:08, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear sir I am not a paid advocate or anything else. I'm here on Wikipedia since 2017 as a fan and knowledge seeker who wants to become a Polymath Wikipedian. I always contribute wikipedia from neutral perspective and always will. I am requesting to remove the protection for Dushyant Kapoor page is because it was been protected from a long time and I think I can create a Wikipedia standards page or someone else would create it. Kindly correct yourself sir on this regard. Armaghan Muawiyah (talk) 18:17, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, who were you referring to as your client? —Cryptic 18:19, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another wikipedia user. But if I do have a paid client I will disclose it as per Wikipedia policy. So rest assured it is a voice for letting admins know. Armaghan Muawiyah (talk) 18:23, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly remove the protection or at least lessen it. If you think it is not worth publishing you can delete it. Anyway Dushyant Kapoor is a director from India. I want him on Wikipedia as a viewer of his work and on the request of my fellow wikipedia user, "my client". Thank you for your time and priceless information ☺️ It will be really useful for me in future. Armaghan Muawiyah (talk) 18:36, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You've made no reply whatsoever to my request for your sources, and your responses here do not inspire confidence. I'm not inclined to unprotect at this time. Your route of appeal is a formal discussion at WP:Deletion review, but I advise you that if you continue to just assert the existence of sources without providing them, they're unlikely to take any action either. —Cryptic 18:52, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem sir. My task was just to inform you about this. I have nothing to do with it seriously. It was just a request so I forward it to your notice. Thank you again. Armaghan Muawiyah (talk) 19:35, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Armaghan Muawiyah Would you like to disclose and tell the truth or would you rather me send the off wiki evidence to arbcom? PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:03, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As I already said I am not getting paid on writing article I just contribute to Wikipedia because I love this platform. This is the truth. I have zero fear so do whatever you want because I receive zero payment because I am a volunteer. Armaghan Muawiyah (talk) 17:28, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

William Bishop (musician) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, William Bishop (musician), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:04, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks Armaghan Muawiyah (talk) 18:16, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021[edit]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

--Blablubbs (talk) 17:28, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What a fuck! You are one of the biggest bullshits that I had ever met with. I hadn't created Dushyant Kapoor's page I just request it to kindly limit the protection so that anyone can edit it. But I don't know why you feel that I am getting paid on contributing wikipedia. It's such a bullshit. I'm really angry as you had forgot and dismissed my all contribution since 2017. That's mean I am taking money from 2017? What a stupid decision. Armaghan Muawiyah (talk) 17:34, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Care to enlighten your fellow "volunteers" on your relationship with Draft:William Bishop (musician)? PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:38, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I had created William Bishop's page as a fan. As I had created list of pink panther games as a gaming fan? I also once created Qamar Iqbal Sufi page because he is my teacher. These are the three pages that I had created. Otherwise I just edit and improve the articles. I'm student I know I make mistakes but whenever someone points out I try to improve it. But why does it mean that I am taking money? If seriously I am taking money I would definitely disclosed it as it against my religious views. I can even show my account transaction whenever you law demands it. Armaghan Muawiyah (talk) 17:45, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's your right to investigate but it's really unfair that you distrust someone. If I really getting paid I had disclosed it long ago. I haven't created Dushyant Kapoor page. He just request me to request the admins so I did. If I'm a cheater then why I would say "My Client" as I already know about the terms and conditions of Wikipedia? Armaghan Muawiyah (talk) 17:48, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This unblocking shows your rash but unresponsive response. Do justice and think about it I didn't even created a page of Dushyant Kapoor then why it proves that I am a paid advocate? Have a common sense. Kindly don't neglect my 1600+ contributions from 2017. I'm a sincere volunteer wikipedian. Regards Armaghan Muawiyah (talk) 19:15, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Armaghan Muawiyah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm a Wikipedia Editor from 2017. I'm knowledge seeker and lover of Wikipedia. I honestly contributed wikipedia as a lover of Wikipedia. But for all my contributions they block my account because I just request to lower the protection of Dushyant Kapoor's page. He requested me to submit the request so I did by referring as "my client". He didn't give me a single penny nor I demand and created his page. This is really a unprofessional and bullshit response from the admins. I am willing to give you right to investigate as I'm clear. It's against my religion also to do such things. If I am receiving money I had already disclosed it long time ago because I know Wikipedia terms and conditions. Kindly unblock my account because it's really injustice and rash but unresponsive response from admins. Regards Armaghan Muawiyah

This unblocking shows your rash but unresponsive response. Do justice and think about it I didn't even created a page of Dushyant Kapoor then why it proves that I am a paid advocate? Have a common sense. Kindly don't neglect my 1600+ contributions from 2017. I'm a sincere volunteer wikipedian. Regards Armaghan Muawiyah (talk) 18:15, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I have reason to not believe this explanation. Until you choose to be completely honest with us there is no pathway forward here. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 20:08, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

OMG! Ok tell me, How can I tell you that I am honestly saying that I hadn't received a single penny from anyone here. I am just a volunteer. Nor I did create a page for Dushyant Kapoor. I just request to lower the protection for Dushyant Kapoor's page. That's all. Believe it or not, but this is the truth. Armaghan Muawiyah (talk) 20:15, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly give your reasons not to believe me. It's seriously strange and embarrassing. As I am contributing wikipedia since 2017 and now I am getting treated like this. I swear if I had received money I already informed wikipedia authority as mentioned in terms and conditions. Armaghan Muawiyah (talk) 20:18, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am not allowed by policy to divulge what I know. We can talk about it if you waived your right to privacy- but I don't think you should and I do not encourage you to. 331dot (talk) 20:35, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I want justice. I don't care about my privacy because I had nothing to hide. Besides I had nothing to do with Dushyant Kapoor page. So all I want is my account to unblock. I will be careful in future. Armaghan Muawiyah (talk) 20:39, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I stress that I do not think that you should waive your privacy rights and I do not encourage it. However, if that's what you want to do, you need to specifically say so. 331dot (talk) 20:51, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If it satisfies you then I am ready. I want to unblock my account. If I am really guilty then I accept the punishment of being blocked, but if I am not then I'll have my account back, because I am really a sincere volunteer wikipedian. I admit I made mistakes but I haven't done anything wrong. Armaghan Muawiyah (talk) 20:57, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What would satisfy me is if you didn't waive your privacy and chose to be honest yourself. But the choice is yours. 331dot (talk) 21:00, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sir I am honestly saying. I don't know why you won't believing. I said earlier and I say now I haven't received a single penny. In future whenever I will I would definitely inform Wikipedia authority. I admit my neglengence as a Wikipedia Editor but I didn't did anything wrong. Simple and honest response. Armaghan Muawiyah (talk) 21:05, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Because I don't wish to help you violate your privacy, I will only say that I suggest you think about why others might think you are a paid editor and address that. I don't really have anything else to say, you may make another unblock request for someone else to review. 331dot (talk) 21:18, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

They think that because I had requested to limit the protection for Dushyant Kapoor page. My message was that "My Client" wants to.... But it was just a request from him. I didn't receive any order from him nor a payment. They say you didn't disclosed it so they block my account. Maybe it's my message or my neglengence but whatever the case I honestly saying I don't receive a single penny. I will be more careful in future anyway thank you for your time. I'm sad became from 4 years I'm proud to be a Wikipedia Editor but now I'm blocked and I can't prove my innocence Thanks again Armaghan Muawiyah (talk) 21:23, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That was my stupid message that ruin my repo as a neutral wikipedia user. But it was just a request nothing else

Remove the protection for the page "Dushyant Kapoor"[edit]

My client wants to create Dushyant Kapoor page. I request to kindly remove the protection and allow me to work on it so that it will fulfill Wikipedia standards and I as an Extended Confirmed User and lover of Wikipedia contribute in making wikipedia greater. I will try my best to make this page as good with solid references. Kindly approve my request. Regards, Thanks in advance Armaghan Muawiya Armaghan Muawiyah (talk) 21:25, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You must make another unblock request for someone to review. 331dot (talk) 09:10, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You keep using "My client" that shows that you are WP:PAID and have a WP:COI. Lavalizard101 (talk) 12:31, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear kindly read my previous messages. I'm telling 331dot that this was my message which I requested. I repost this message as a reference. I don't know why you don't have common sense. I haven't made the article so how can I be paid. Moreover according to wikipedia policy after making a page then you have to declare it as it is paid or not Arkantos4695 (talk) 13:34, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This really shows that majority of Wikipedia admins are stupid idiots, they can't use there common sense and response childishly. I said if I really had a contract then why I wouldn't declare it? Arkantos4695 (talk) 13:35, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have to have a written contract to be paid. If you want someone heretofore uninvolved to look at this, you must make another unblock request and explain your statements if they mean something other than actually having a paying client. 331dot (talk) 13:41, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]