User talk:Badmachine/Archive2

SWAG

This user religiously worships BASEDGOD.

Archives

January 22, 2008 - May 18, 2010

Removed speedy deletion tag: Charles Hamilton (rapper)

Hi Badmachine! Firstly, thanks for helping out in CSD areas. I just wanted to inform you that I removed the speedy deletion tag you placed on Charles Hamilton (rapper)- because: the article makes a credible claim of importance or significance. If you have any questions or other message, please contact me. Thanks Kingpin¹³ (talk) 07:36, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sherrod

Have you read Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars? It is considered rude to do so. In any case , you are wrong. Please have a look at the USA today article where it clearly says:[1]

"They called me twice," Sherrod said, referring to the Ag Department. "The last time they asked me to pull over the side of the road and submit my resignation on my Blackberry, and that's what I did."

I would like an apology or retraction on my talk page please. LK (talk) 09:46, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

done. i did not see the USA Today cite, only the one from BBC, which did not quote her. Badmachine (talk) 10:27, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was kinda hoping for a 'I was wrong about the sourcing, you didn't vandalize the page' kinda apology. But I kinda owe you one too for the tone of my message. :-/ LK (talk) 17:14, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

of course you didnt vandalize the page. i failed to assume good faith and i missed the better of the two citations. dont worry about the tone of your message; it was me who didnt know the guideline and it was not my intent to be rude. Badmachine (talk) 19:40, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Now I should apologize for asking for an apology in the first place, per WP:apology. ;-) LK (talk) 07:25, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1990s in fashion

Hi. I see you tagged 1990-2009 in fashion with a contradict flag, which got dragged across to the 1990s in fashion split. I've had a look, and couldn't see any obvious contradictions, so I've removed the tag. If I've missed it, feel free to put the tag back on, and leave a note at the talk page. Cheers. -- WORM MЯOW 14:19, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

that was so long ago that i cant even remember what the contradiction was. Badmachine (talk) 18:26, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

but i am glad they finally split the article into two. Badmachine (talk) 18:28, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gloria Allred

Thanks for the message about my edit of Gloria Allred. I was mainly trying to revert back past some obvious vandalism. It looks like I made a mistake in restoring the bizarre phrase "run and dump", and I will go and fix it now. Thanks for pointing out what I had done. Grafen (talk) 09:30, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, you've already done it. Thanks again. Grafen (talk) 09:32, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:46, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yo!

<3 - Alison ^❤ 16:41, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok - done - I'll jump in and help on this one. I was a veteran of the Meow Wars, back in the day - Alison ^❤ 04:48, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Biting...

Only applies to actual newbies. No one simply arrives at a hot-button topic like this form day 1 without familiarity with the subject area. "Gacurr" is more than likely a returned Benjiboi. Tarc (talk) 02:18, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

hello friend

B| --♣thayora♣ 17:59, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Meow Wars

User:Badmachine/mw. You started doing some stuff here in May. Every single source is from Google Groups or a personal website. I really don't think it stands a chance since there are no hits on Gnews or Gbooks. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 07:09, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Jereme Richmond.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jereme Richmond.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:05, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My p*nis

Hi! Do you know you are using my penis as your user pic? I don't mind, really. Just wanted to let you know. :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.81.179.209 (talk • contribs)

LOLOLOLOLOL!!! xD - Alison ^❤ 23:38, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alison! Love your pink hair. You're cute! You can find more of me, if you'd like, here : http://showyourdick.org/member.php?w=127803 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.81.179.209 (talk) 15:18, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage is absolutely fantastic! :) --♣thayora♣ 03:49, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! ;-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.81.179.209 (talk) 14:39, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

Hello Badmachine! I hope you enjoy this cookie as an amicable greeting from a fellow Wikipedian, SwisterTwister talk 06:56, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Death of Caylee Anthony article

Thank you for these edits: [2][3] The mistake was made here a month ago, and, apparently, though the editor fixed the other mistakes he made, he neglected to fix those two mistakes. I wish I had spotted them as soon as they were made. Flyer22 (talk) 22:23, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kelly Thomas American.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kelly Thomas American.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:51, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Dromedary

Hello, Badmachine. You have new messages at Sainsf's talk page.
Message added 04:44, 12 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Bjork talk page archive

Hello. I had to revert the edit you made to the Björk talk page because it interfered with the edits that were made as a part of the GA review. The Björk talk page had been properly archived. You can see the link to the new archive page in the archive box. The archive style is a little weird, but I decided to keep it in the same format as the other archive page. --Tea with toast (話) 17:44, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Crystal Hotel (San Francisco)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Crystal Hotel (San Francisco) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Epeefleche (talk) 22:58, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RE:

No problem! Always nice to have another pony helping the cause! Princess Derpy (talk) 08:44, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SF meetup tomorrow

Hi! I just wanted to send you a quick reminder that we're having a lunch meetup at the Wikimedia Foundation on Saturday. Thanks for signing up! Just as a reminder you can find the location, time, and more info about the meetup at Wikipedia:Meetup/San Francisco 17. See you tomorrow, Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 00:49, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pickbothmanlol for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 01:44, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:ME AND JEFF STRYKER.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ME AND JEFF STRYKER.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:41, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Ohio Pen 1931.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ohio Pen 1931.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:06, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Penis

Don't think I haven't thought of it, cept all the good ones are locked. Night Ranger (talk) 02:00, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I dunno. I'm leaning towards getting myself blocked and then making like 1000 sockpuppets. Or else using the photo of the baboon's ass. That's more like what I think of Wikipedia right now. Night Ranger (talk) 02:09, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have a gift on my userpage. Night Ranger (talk) 02:15, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And it looks like 28bytes (talk · contribs) has interfered with your penis, sorry :/ - Alison ^❤ 06:36, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's clearly not okay to have a penis pic on your userpage, because that's just not appropriate! Some people might get offended if you did that, and we don't want that. Kinda like they would if they typed the word "forefinger" into the search box on Commons, y'know? And we really wouldn't want that, now would we? - Alison ^❤ 06:53, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alison, don't make me interfere with your penis. As for the forefinger search, I guess one is never too old to learn. Night Ranger, please don't even consider the socking thing. It's irritating. I already have gag reflexes when I run into SA, and then there's the Cincinnati Zoo dude, and the Tachash dude, and the Boston fan who hates fat people (and penises)... Drmies (talk) 13:27, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hate penises??? How could someone hate something so beautiful. It's like hating baby deer, cupcakes and well-stacked bosoms. Night Ranger (talk) 22:40, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alison is the bestest admin ever. Badmachine, you have another gift on my userpage. Night Ranger (talk) 22:43, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rather you did until they blocked me. Been nice knowing ya! ReturnoftheGobbledyGooker (talk) 23:23, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Badmachine, you have already been pointed to the guideline under which additions of sexually provocative content can be reverted. And yet you appear to be dead set on having the image of a penis on your userpage. Please be aware that the next time you try to add one back, I'll fully protect the page indefinitely. $Salvio$ ^{Let's talk about it!} 12:13, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for Trolling and bating, as you did at User:Night Ranger. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Guerillero | My Talk 03:56, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

i have no idea what this is all about. i have not even edited that page at all. i presume this refers to the talk page, on which i engaged in civil discourse with a user who was being harassed. no matter tho, i can wait a week. -badmachine 05:11, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is ridiculous, as I just stated on ANI. Per policy, blocks are meant to be preventative, not punitive, and this week-long block, without warning, is unacceptable especially given two admins (myself and Drmies) are already involved here and in discussion. I'm unblocking - Alison ^❤ 05:20, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

i still seem to be blocked. i looked at ANI, and as far as i can tell, Guerillero thinks my comment 'im glad youve changed your ways' refers to his statement of intent to sock. my reply was to the other part of the same message: 'i used to be like that but not anymore'. me and Night Ranger have a past, he opened a sockpuppet investigation on me, and i didnt care for that. then i saw him getting mad about stuff that isnt worth getting mad about, so i was trying to encourage him to adopt a different attitude. anyway, whatever. i am still blocked, and i dont want anyone to get in trouble on my behalf. i believe my behavior is not inappropriate. -badmachine 06:12, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your autoblock is probably still in place. Can you post the autoblock ID here and I'll deal with it? - Alison ^❤ 06:26, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done - Alison ^❤ 06:31, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thanks Alison. afa 'taking one for the team', that was a reply to a humourous message from Drmies on Night Ranger's talk page, and the penis suggestion referred to Night Ranger's reporting of my previous previous userpage to ANI. -badmachine 06:34, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I should give you a warning for original research. If I said anything humorous, it was completely unintentional. Don't you know I'm a fucking admin? We don't joke around here, badmachine. Next time, you get a level-4 turkey slap. Drmies (talk) 18:11, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Man, I've never seen a level-4 before! Is it anything like this? - Alison ^❤ 19:17, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

By way of comparison

Alison's "turkey"
My "turkey" (Badmachine napping on right)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Drmies (talk • contribs)

:D -badmachine 03:38, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Satanism

Userspace is not meant to be used for trolling; since you appear dead set on trying to misuse your userpage, I have indefinitely protected it. $Salvio$ ^{Let's talk about it!} 23:54, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Satanism is a perfectly valid religion, with quite a large number of adherents in the US and elsewhere. It's certainly no less valid than many other cults. I can't believe you removed someone's profession of religious beliefs from their user page and then sysop-protected it. Please undo your admin action here, unless you intend to go do the same to all the Christians, Moslems and others here. While you're at it, check out Category:Satanist Wikipedians - there are plenty - Alison ^❤ 02:05, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Alison, I have informed the admin that, while the userbox was a joke (and even so still perfectly acceptable according to WP:Userbox), it still could be considered a valid belief. I also do feel that indefinite protection was a bit much over a userbox. -badmachine 02:09, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage content

In the context of the concerns that your contributions to Wikipedia are heavily focused on trolling and disruption (or at least have the consistent effect of enabling disruptive users), please explain the statement on your talkpage that you are "friends with" former User:Meepsheep. You may respond via e-mail if necessary. Thank you. Newyorkbrad (talk) 22:12, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If I were badmachine I might be forgiven for assuming there was a cabal of people after me. Seriously? Conviction by association? Wood for trees, pal. Might be time for some perspective, no? 62.255.248.225 (talk) 11:18, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Banned users...

A ban is different than indef-blocked. Please stop adding indef-blocked users to the list. Calabe 1992 15:47, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

okie dokie :) -badmachine 18:09, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

So I can edit again. How's everything going with you? Seen any good penii lately? Night Ranger (talk) 23:37, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed from the discussion above that your userpage is protected. I hope my antics from my prior life before I stopped giving a fuck didn't bring this unwanted admin attention. :-( Night Ranger (talk) 23:40, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm shocked and disgusted by your comment here! Everyone knows it's penes and not penii - Tsk xD - Alison ^❤ 23:43, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. The great thing about them is there is no shortage of names! Night Ranger (talk) 01:59, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Glad we all came to a compromise :D -badmachine 09:20, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I just wanted to say thanks for making me aware of the wealth of penises in the commons. I knew that lurking WP:AN/I would pay off eventually. MyNameWasTaken (talk) 17:18, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I thought we were friends

traitor --♣thayora♣ 04:43, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I thought we were friends

traitor --JohnnyLurg (talk) 11:12, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Furry fandom

hello. i understand your need to promote wikifur. however, a single sentence mention does not make it notable. there is an essay on this, but WP:GNG states that in general, a single sentence mention in insufficient to establish notability. :) -badmachine 19:42, 9 April 2012 (UTC) — Preceding text originally posted on User talk:GreenReaper (diff) by badmachine (talk⋅contribs) 19:42, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As I explained elsewhere, Wikipedia's concept of notability relates to whether a subject should have its own article – not whether it should be mentioned in a section of an article about a wider topic, nor whether there should be a redirect to that section from the subject's name. Please read the guideline you are pointing at before trying to use it. GreenReaper (talk) 19:51, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What was that about?

Would you mind not sending me template messages telling me I'm going to be blocked? I created that page as the result of a community discussion so I don't appreciate you sending me threatening messages accusing me of personal attacks. Big Dom 21:35, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

R Santorum Pres merge desire

Hi - as you didn't give a policy or guideline reason for your desire - I have removed the merge template - I suggest you discuss a bit more and present policy and guideline driven reasons for your desired edit - thanks - Youreallycan 19:15, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Csuseal gold black.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Csuseal gold black.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:34, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

edit request

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

hello. i would like to replace my userpage content with this source code:

{{userboxtop}}
{{User DGAF}}
{{User WikiProject IPC}}
{{User MLP}}
{{userbox|#FFFFFF|#A9A9A9|[[Image:Gnaa-logo.png|45px|]]|This user endorses the activities of the [[Gay Nigger Association of America|GNAA]].}}
{{userbox
| border-c = {{{1|{{{border-c|#aa0000}}}}}}
| id       = {{{3|[[Image:Inverted_pentacle.svg|40px]]}}}
| id-c     = {{{1|maroon}}}
| id-fc    = {{{id-fc|white}}}
| id-s     = {{{5|14}}}
| info     = {{{4|This user hails Satan everyday.}}}
| info-c   = {{{2|#343434}}}
| info-fc  = {{{info-fc|#ff3333}}}
| info-s   = {{{info-s|8}}}
| usercategory  = <includeonly>Satanist Wikipedians</includeonly>
| nocat = {{{nocat|}}}
}}
{{userboxbottom}}

[[File:English language Communist International issue 6.jpg|thumb|center|666px]]

== See also ==
*[[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive738#Are_people_allowed_to_put_penis_pictures_on_their_userpage_and_fake_the_media_wiki_interface.3F|Wikipedia is censored]]

== Wikipedians I am friends with ==
*[[User:Alison|Alison]]
*[[User:Equivamp|Equivamp]]
*[[User:LiteralKa|Leon]]
*[[User:Meepsheep|Meepsheep]]
*[[User:Incognito|Incog]]
*[[User:Murdox|Murdox]]

it is essentially the same source code as what is there now, except with a userbox restored, and an image added that i uploaded for my user page. many thanks. :)

-badmachine 13:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done:, considering that your user page is protected in part because of that userbox. Please contact Salvio giuliano (talk · contribs) directly, or appeal to WP:AN. Anomie ⚔ 02:26, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

i absolutely refuse to do this. i feel that he has a vendetta against me for my religious views, and i will not grovel. as far as i am concerned, he is a big meanie. :( -badmachine 03:37, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

IPBE Request

Hello Badmachine. At this time I can't grant you WP:IPBE as you don't really fall under any of the criteria for granting this bit. Generally we allow editors to edit through tor as a means to get around restrictions they are otherwise facing (such as Chinese editors). Your situation, however, is different. If you are concerned about privacy, note that your IP address is protected by the WMF privacy policy, and an extremely limited number of people have the capability of seeing it (and such access is logged and heavily monitored). If you can't trust the people with such access, then there's not much more we can do for you. Please note that our policy on IPBE explicitly calls out that avoidance of checkuser is not a reason for granting this bit. Let me know if you have any questions. On a side note, thank you for pointing out that User:TorNodeBot did not have a confirmed email address. I have fixed this. Regards, Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 04:25, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ya

It's pretty much all my fault. :-( If you want your userpage unprotected any not request it at RFPP? Maybe some nice person will accept your request. I hope you haven't done anything rash, very few people here are any fun at all and you're one of the few who are. Night Ranger (talk) 02:38, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Banning you would be absurd, you haven't done anything to deserve that. There's no way that will go over. You just automatically have enemies because of the GNAA userbox. Mob is chomping at the bit. Where is Alison? Night Ranger (talk) 02:48, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, but friends are nice to have. Anyway, I opposed the ban but even if I hadn't I seriously doubt it would get any traction. I'm pretty sure your userpage will be unlocked at some point. Night Ranger (talk) 02:52, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alison is hella busy right now, but drops in every so often. If Badmachine gets banned for no good reason, she will not be pleased - Alison ^❤ 05:01, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotect

I'm inclined to unprotect your page. Please remember that you do not WP:OWN your userpage, and if you are back at teh dramahhboards for doing something controversial with it, there seem to be a number of admisn willing to block for that, which would be a shame. Also the unprotection does not mean that the current version is neccesarily acceptable to the community. Rich Farmbrough, 03:44, 1 May 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Well done Rich. badmachine...if you want to prevent future dramah... Drmies (talk) 03:55, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

i believe that my userpage is fine now. i still wish the 'admins can have cocks, but paeons can not' issue had been addressed, but this is good enough for now. one day, i will have that "big schlong barnnstar", the steward bit, and raining dongs on the main page. :3 -badmachine 03:58, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]