User talk:Beagel/archive2016

Four years ago ...
energy
	... you were recipient; no. 180 of Precious,; a prize of QAI!

Archives... 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006

Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

Hello, Beagel. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Hugh (talk) 15:21, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Under a voluntary Tban I should not have been commenting on climate stuff even in talk pages apparentlyRetired from that area for 6 months or so at least. Thanks for your work on the article NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 22:31, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Engineering, Procurement and Construction

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Engineering, Procurement and Construction requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.epcengineer.com/definition/132/epc-engineering-procurement-construction. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa (talk) 19:20, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Diannaa. Thank you for your notification. However, if you look the history of that page, you can see that this was not created by me but by user:Robertiki. Beagel (talk) 20:15, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for for the involvement. Have just written to User_talk:Diannaa#Engineering.2C_Procurement_and_Construction. --Robertiki (talk) 00:24, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the mis-notification, Beagel. Twas Twinkle that chose the recipient. -- — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:34, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Transcription

Hi,
From these comments came to my mind e.g. these talks of the user Ezhiki:

What is Your opinion? Is Ezhiki a "transcription dictator" of the English Wikipedia?
--85.76.9.28 (talk) 14:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration notification about climate change topics

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Climate change, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

prokaryotes (talk) 15:32, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And what has removal of misused company logo to do with climate change? Please be aware that as a protected trade mark, the usage of company's logo is limited and should have a justified rationale. Beagel (talk) 15:59, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 16 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Activ Solar page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Terna Group

Hello, as you can see here the official name of the company is TERNA - Rete Elettrica Nazionale S.p.A., as also in the italian version which is that of the country of the company. It is all clear now? --100% Reporter (talk) 03:12, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@100% Reporter: Few things. Wikipedia is not about the official name, it is about the common name per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:NCCORP. There is no way that TERNA - Rete Elettrica Nazionale S.p.A. is the common name in English. The common name is Terna, but it can't be used as it is disambiguate with the Greece company. The second best is Terna Group which is used also by the company itself (and in fact, it is not a single company but the group of companies). Second, the name Terna Group was a result of a requested move per WP:RM. Therefore, changing name without new requested move discussion is not acceptable. Beagel (talk) 06:42, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, since the company has been listed on Borsa Italiana and not the group is not better name the page Terna (Italian company) or Terna (company)? Or it would be even better to move Terna to Terna (disambiguation) and so Terna Group to Terna? --100% Reporter (talk) 08:00, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Terna (company) is not a good choice due to disambiguation. As Terna (Italian company) versus Terna Group I still prefer Terna Group as:

It is a group of companies (Terna Rete Italia and terna Plus); and
The name Terna Group is used by the company itself per http://www.terna.it/en-gb/azienda.aspx.

However, if you think that some other name suits better that article, please start the discussion at the article's talk page by using {{requested move}} template. Beagel (talk) 15:20, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What disambiguation? Greek enterprises have already their title. The official name is not Terna Group and this isn't even the common name. So if you don't want the official name much better names put forward or please submit it one yourself. --100% Reporter (talk) 03:13, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2016 April 18

Re Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2016 April 18, I'm confused. You're opposing your own nomination, and as far as I can see things are backwards: HughD moved page Category:ExxonMobil controversies to Category:ExxonMobil history. Errrm, or are you *submitting* HDs change for approval, with the intent of getting it opposed, and therefore reverted? If so, you should be clearer William M. Connolley (talk) 07:54, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment. Yes, I nominated it "on behalf" of user:HughD as they decided just to ignore the request to discuss this controversial move properly. I amended my nomination to clarify my intentions. Beagel (talk) 16:39, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Meshkinshahr Geothermal Power Plant

Hi Beagel,

I think the 250 MW nameplate capacity is just wrong. This German source from 17 March 2016 talks about 5 MW.--Kopiersperre (talk) 08:35, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Kopiersperre: You are absolutely right. It seemed also dubious for me when I added this figure from the body text to the infobox, but I did not had a time to check the accuracy then. That article's text needs a checking and proper citations as most of the links at the end are dead. Beagel (talk) 16:13, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

250 MW came from this source. It seems to be a final plan but not implemented as I ca see from the other sources. Beagel (talk) 16:21, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I copied this discussion to the article's talk page. Better to discuss there. Beagel (talk) 16:26, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hélène Pelosse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Springer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

John Butters

OK, thanks for fixing the butters box (my mistake) - I fail to see why it had had crotty at the top, pity I cannot find my photo of butters, such a non entity of a structure at the end of the king river gorge. cheers. JarrahTree 01:25, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:31, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Gerda. Thank you very much for this nice reminder! Beagel (talk) 12:00, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion under A7 for Offshore Oil Engineering

Hi there, you put a speedy deletion label on Offshore Oil Engineering under A7 (not notable).

It's a member of the SSE Composite Index, which means it's one of the 50 largest companies in China.

As I remember it, membership of a major index is one of the criteria for notability, but even disregarding that, it's a pretty significant entity with global impact. There isn't a lot of information available about it, but that's an issue with our perspective, rather than an issue with the subject matter.

I totally understand that the page is a stub, my intention was to build just enough that it would be valid, and allow it to be subsequently built upon.

Let me know if you think I missed the mark, but otherwise could we avoid trashing it?

Thanks :) Tabel dammit (talk) 06:19, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Tabel dammit:. The nomination was declined by DGG. This is fine for me. I also share his opinion concerning the merge proposal. There is not enough content at the moment to justify a separate article. If it will be kept as a separate article, it needs a rapid expansion soon. Otherwise, it would be better to be merged into China National Offshore Oil Corporation now and split later when there is a sufficient amount of content for the separate article. Beagel (talk) 12:14, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Beagel Sounds sensible. Cheers Tabel dammit (talk) 12:17, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding content deletion on the page Hinkley_Point_C_nuclear_power_station. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution, see here. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Lancastle (talk) 17:42, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited North Sea Link, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Grid. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Electric power transmission system operators in Bangladesh has been nominated for discussion

Category:Electric power transmission system operators in Bangladesh, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:25, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Enersis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Endesa. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ExxonMobil climate change controversy, "not about climate change"?

Why did you delete a well-sourced sentence about global warming, with an example reference titled "A New Debate Over Pricing the Risks of Climate Change", and leave a comment "not about climate change"? Another reference titled "SEC Probes Exxon Over Accounting for Climate Change"; an excerpt from another reference "Environmentalists cheered the S.E.C. inquiry in hopes that regulators were escalating their enforcement on the oil and gas industry to include more rigorous reporting to investors on the potential risks of climate change to their businesses."; and another reference excerpt "An added twist is that the SEC is also reportedly interested in how Exxon factors potential carbon regulations into how it values its reserves, dovetailing neatly with several state investigations into whether the oil major covered up knowledge about the impact of climate change."

Please go back to Talk:ExxonMobil climate change controversy. 69.58.42.90 (talk) 00:27, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I answered on the article's talk page, so please discuss there. Beagel (talk) 18:38, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 2 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Welspun Energy page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Talk:Sungevity

Talk:Sungevity, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Sungevity and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Talk:Sungevity during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DGG ( talk ) 15:57, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Puma Energy - few updates

Hi Beagel, there are a few things in Puma Energy that could be updated – revenue, number of countries, some of the storage stats. They've also made acquisitions in South Africa. I've marked it up in a userspace draft. If you're okay with these changes there's a clean version on the talk page. Thanks. HOgilvy (talk) 20:46, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Beagel. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Thanks for your patient reply on DAPL. It's amazing to me 1) that I seem to have missed the two references in the 2nd paragraph of "ownership" and that 2) a missing article can lead to me to think a sentence is confusing. Both are bad news, I must be getting old. ^^ SashiRolls (talk) 10:38, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 7 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Galoter process page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 17 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Druzhba pipeline page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]