User talk:Bergmanucsd

Welcome

Hello, Bergmanucsd, and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are a course instructor leading a class project.

New to Wikipedia or want to learn about best practices for Wikipedia assignments?

Go through our online training for educators

The training includes instructions for setting up a structured course page, with tools for tracking student work and encouraging peer review. Please also see this helpful advice for instructors.

If you run into problems or want some feedback on your Wikipedia assignment plans, try posting to the education noticeboard.

We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay after your assignment is finished! Dolotta (talk) 06:38, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2020 Burgenland state election moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2020 Burgenland state election, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:33, 27 January 2020 (UTC) Thank you CASSIOPEIA, I have adjusted the page and re-submitted for review.[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2020 Burgenland state election has been accepted

2020 Burgenland state election, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KylieTastic (talk) 10:25, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Several students picking too broad articles

Hi! So glad to see your class editing Wikipedia (cc' @Ian (Wiki Ed)). However, I have noticed that several of the students are picking articles that would be almost impossible to contribute to as a newer editors, such as Plastic pollution, Climate change mitigation, War on drugs, Feminist movement, Feminism and Gentrification -- these articles all have hundreds of references, and are very broad scope topics that a new editor will often get overwhelmed by. I suggest helping students find more targeted, focused articles -- I subtopics that don't look like they have already been deeply covered. Some of the articles from you class that look good to me include: Below Poverty Line, Trophy_hunting, Fisher v. University of Texas (2016, Climate change and invasive species, Phase-out of lightweight plastic bags, and Illegal_Immigration_Reform_and_Immigrant_Responsibility_Act_of_1996 . I hope this is helpful, and I would hate to see a bunch of you students getting reverted at the end of term. Sadads (talk) 23:30, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reminding me about the prospect of reversion. I will be sure to share this with the students.

I was SHOCKED to see how few actually even logged in before the due-date to do the trainings and assign an article.

Thanks again for your attention to helping my students succeed with this project and better Wikipedia. Bergmanucsd (talk) 18:23, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NATO article edit

Hi. Just wanted to thank you for your recent addition of a new section to the NATO article. Well-sourced and informative, definitely an improvement. Thanks. CAVincent (talk) 04:40, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this! I must also give credit where it is due. The suggested edits came from Rasmih , but the page had editing restrictions, so I posted on that accounts behalf. Bergmanucsd (talk) 05:34, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well then thanks also to @Rasmih:! Great to have new editors contributing in such a helpful way! CAVincent (talk) 05:36, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Slovakia

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Slovakia, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:12, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Speaking as one academic to another, this edit of yours: [1], was inappropriate. Please be careful not to do that again. Thanks. --Tryptofish (talk) 19:31, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bergmanucsd, I've undone your unilateral move of the user draft to mainspace while the discussion linked above is ongoing. The article is available for editing at Draft:Iraq and the World Bank. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 20:46, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at the Education Noticeboard

There is a discussion involving a class you teach at the Education Noticeboard to which you have been pinged and which you clearly saw because of the edit you made referenced by Tryptofish above. Please plan to participate in that discussion before doing any other work for your current class; failure to do so may result in a sanction against you. I hate making this kind of statement as it's not collaborative but I didn't want there to be any misunderstanding. Barkeep49 (talk) 23:57, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed the link to ENB in User:Barkeep49's message above to point to ENB. Mathglot (talk) 00:18, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 04:58, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bergmanucsd: Please respond at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Wiki Ed instructor not engaging with community concerns. Contributors are required to communicate with others (WP:ENGAGE) and may be blocked if ongoing problems are not addressed. Johnuniq (talk) 05:52, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I am available to brainstorm ways with WikiEdu staff of how to improve their training and overall programming, as I have been now for 6 years. Bergmanucsd (talk) 08:54, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am available to brainstorm ways with WikiEdu staff of how to improve their training and overall programming, as I have been now for 6 years. Bergmanucsd (talk) 08:54, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just for clarity, are you saying you won't discuss this with us but only with WikiEdu staff? Valereee (talk) 16:52, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Posting the same uninformative copy-pasted comment repeatedly in various places is not the type of response expected on a collaborative project. Cullen328 (talk) 17:38, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Cullen328, I'm starting to think this editor doesn't realize the seriousness of the situation or what the outcome could be. Bergmanucsd, this could actually affect your ability to teach your syllabus. 100% serious here, no lie, WikiEdu staff cannot overrule the community. Valereee (talk) 20:33, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, Valereee. I am not yet prepared to support sanctions without allowing this editor to ponder the seriousness of the situation and to respond in an informative, collaborative fashion. Bergmanucsd, if you expect WikiEd to protect you in this situation, you are incorrect. WikiEd is a separate organization with no special power or authority on English Wikipedia. I simply do not understand why professors who lack the requisite skills in Wikipedia editing then set out teach courses based largely on Wikipedia editing. That remains a mystery. Cullen328 (talk) 20:43, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'd like to see thoughtful response, too. Valereee (talk) 20:46, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Valereee

Hi both. Our courses are not based largely on wikipedia editing. If that were the intent, then of course, I would be as skilled in this as you all. Here is the WikiEdu dashboard: https://dashboard.wikiedu.org/explore

Here are the trainings provided to both student and faculty: https://dashboard.wikiedu.org/training

You can see the various types of assignments that courses can integrate parts of wikipedia into their instruction.

I hope this clarifies things. Bergmanucsd (talk) 06:01, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, it doesn't clarify anything. Those are generic links. We want specific answers about your conduct, Bergmanucsd, not vague generalities. Cullen328 (talk) 17:27, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My conduct in future courses as it relates to the content that my students post?

I will reiterate the trainings provided by WikiEdu and the policies contained therein, reiterate the course grading requires them to conform to Wikipedia policies, and show them some flagged pages as examples for the type of contribution that does not conform to Wikipedia standards. Bergmanucsd (talk) 18:29, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]