Jump to content

User talk:Bob Watson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Bob Watson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 20:16, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Hector Elizondo filmography) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Hector Elizondo filmography, Bob Watson!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I redirected this unfinished list back to Héctor_Elizondo#Filmography, which provides adequate info already. A stand-alone filmography should be more comprehensive to warrant separate status.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

--Animalparty! (talk) 20:13, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Patrick Haggerty(musician and activist requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --Animalparty! (talk) 03:10, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The editor has since created a page covering the same subject at Patrick Haggerty (musician). 93 21:13, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Haggerty

[edit]

Please note that to qualify for a standalone article separately from Lavender Country, Patrick Haggerty needs to be shown as the subject of enough reliable source coverage to pass WP:GNG. He is not entitled to keep an unsourced article just because he exists; without sourcing all he gets to have is a redirect to the band. This is not a rule you're free to ignore; it's a rule you can be blocked from editing Wikipedia if you fail to follow. Please feel free to work on an article through the WP:AFC process if you're really determined about it, but it doesn't get to stay in articlespace without adequate reliable sources to support it. Bearcat (talk) 21:19, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Patrick Haggerty (musician) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. --Animalparty! (talk) 21:22, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Notability. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 93 22:37, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Devin Dawson has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 22:09, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shelly Desai requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 17:23, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bob Watson. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Jimmy Figgis, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Jimmy Figgis to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Meatsgains (talk) 23:04, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Mahveotm. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Jimmy Figgis— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mahveotm (talk) 23:17, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Jimmy Figgis. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Donner60 (talk) 00:08, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion nomination of "This Team Sucks!"

[edit]

This Team Sucks!, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is vandalism.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content, or remove the speedy deletion tag from the page. You can contest the deletion by clicking the "Contest this speedy deletion" button inside the speedy deletion tag. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 00:11, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[edit]

Hello, can you lpease add your sources to Pat Henning? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 17:40, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Anthony Novotny has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 01:45, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Enright Dairy Farms requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 02:29, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Patrick Haggerty (country singer)

[edit]

Hello Bob Watson,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Patrick Haggerty (country singer) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Fbdave (talk) 18:54, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Jimmy Figgis, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Postcard Cathy (talk) 01:04, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted this as the only information I could find for this was about a fictional mobster. If you can cite relaible sources that treat the subject, you might recreate in draft space. "Jimmy the butcher" appears to be the nom du voyage of said fictional mobster. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:02, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Patrick Haggerty (country singer) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Patrick Haggerty (country singer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Haggerty (country singer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 23:30, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ghostbusters. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. The Old JacobiteThe '45 14:35, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Corey Rae has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 01:20, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Joe Santagato. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 03:22, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at June Carter Cash. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:39, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning regarding sources

[edit]

Please let me be very clear, if you continue to add unsourced material to articles, or create unsourced articles about living persons, I will block your account.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 20:49, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eddie Money, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hardball (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Cavan Cunningham has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:20, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:31, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, You Can't Roller Skate in a Buffalo Herd, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Dial911 (talk) 20:18, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cavan Cunningham for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cavan Cunningham is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cavan Cunningham until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 19:01, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lady, Lady, Lady has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

does not list any sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chetsford (talk) 02:14, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent new articles

[edit]

Please read Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Verifiability to ensure that your contributions meet the criteria for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Thanks. Deb (talk) 14:48, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Bad to the Bone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Flesh and Blood and Man Up
Sweet Child o' Mine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Big Daddy and State of Grace
Ruby Tuesday (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Coming Home

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Rock icon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A listing which is just someone's personal opinion without any sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cabayi (talk) 08:28, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Rock icon, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Cabayi (talk) 08:35, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bad to the Bone, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Flesh and Blood and Man Up (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note that Dueling Banjos already existed. Please incorporate any relevant information into that article. Thanks. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 23:07, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Note on adding unsourced content

[edit]
A cup of coffee for you!

Hey, I'm Jonesey95. I noticed that you added content to an article but didn't provide a reliable source. You should cite a reliable source for all of your edits so that they can be verified. In Wikipedia, verifiability means that other people using the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source. Adding unsourced content contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial.

Wikipedia does not publish original research, which refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. The verifiability policy requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged, and for all quotations, anywhere in article space. Articles should be based on reliable and published sources (see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view) and if no reliable sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.

Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. KingAndGod 18:17, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Felicia777. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Merle Haggard have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Felicia (talk) 18:16, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Run Through the Jungle, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages My Girl and Air America (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Tonite is a Wonderful Time to Fall in Love, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 02:39, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! --Animalparty! (talk) 18:13, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve List of Hector Elizondo Performances

[edit]

Hi, I'm Meatsgains. Bob Watson, thanks for creating List of Hector Elizondo Performances!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Meatsgains(talk) 19:40, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Rock and Roll Never Forgets (song), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. The Duke of NonsenseWhat is necessary for thee?. 16:35, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Border Song, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Staple (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Bob Watson. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bob Watson. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tonite is a Wonderful Time to Fall in Love".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:35, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bob Watson. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rock and Roll Never Forgets".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 11:15, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bob Watson. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tonite is a Wonderful Time to Fall in Love".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (Talk) 01:16, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]