Jump to content

User talk:CambridgeBayWeather/Archive18

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.

Replying to your PM

[edit]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Silkroad forums. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. K3y-J 10:10, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just as you asked, i hope we can ressolve this matter.

Question.

[edit]

Is it wikipedia policy to block people who make constructive edits? How many times are you going to attempt to block me and fail? When are you going to understand no matter what, I will be able to edit wikipedia? Is this all making sense to you? Please, block me again, and see how long it takes for me to come back here and say "Nah nah nah nah nah, you can't block me, nah nah nah." :) 75.41.212.224 22:19, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Nah nah nah nah nah, you can't block me, nah nah nah." 71.157.173.146 22:22, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now I'm just going to be be a secret ninja and not write on talk pages. :) That way, you won't find me. :) Do you ever get off wikipedia? Don't you have a life? 71.157.173.146 22:23, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[1] That was quick, thanks! Sprocket 23:41, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hockey North

[edit]

Hello. Can you tell me any info about Hockey North or Hockey Nunavut? Or the 3 "Junior C" class teams that are eligible for the Maritime-Hockey North Junior C Championships (Kivalliq Canucks, Team Baffin... I can only think of two)? Info on that hockey scene is hard to find. DMighton 03:05, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I found the blog for the Baffin Jr. C coach and he said in his blog that there was a team from Rankin (Kivalliq) and Cambridge Bay... I take these teams are zone and/or select teams and only come together for the regional tourney. Here is his blog: http://livingincapedorset.blogspot.com/ -- It seems he wasn't happy with the organization of the event. They beat the Cambridge Bay-based team and got smoked by Kivalliq. DMighton 03:20, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Texas Club

[edit]

How long have you played this game for? I hear from my friends that you are good at it ^__^

And do you have any cheats? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Betamon (talkcontribs) 15:40, 2 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

"the 1985" deletion

[edit]

I submitted a very brief description of "the 1985" (band), because they were a group I was fond of in their existence, and I noticed their name is linked (to no description) in about 3 or 4 different articles.

Yet, my description was deleted because they were "non notable." If this is the case, perhaps you should remove the links in other articles. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tremblehand (talkcontribs) 17:43, 2 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Sorry, but ...

[edit]

Sorry, but the LOVE-chan .. i think in time it will porbably grow and get relatively large. It would overwelm the Ai Otsuka article (pretty much ,now it wouldf end up being nearly half the article) and it would unbalance it. LOVE-chan should have her own article ...

I'm obviously talknig about the LOVE-CHAN article.

And sorry; i have already reverted the article to a previous; previous form. I am consulting you now though ...

Why did you delete the internetz cats article? I was working on it, documenting the internet phenomenon. Just because you might not think something is relevant doesn't mean it shouldn't be documented. Maybe next time I will try to do a full complete page all at once, it's not really that easy though.

Wow, that was fast! Thank you very much. I wasn't sure what to do. *Vendetta* (whois talk edits) 04:11, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

your comment

[edit]

I have responded to your query on my talk page --Hamsacharya dan 04:21, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, could you procedurally list the article at AFD, since you removed the prod tag and the anon couldn't make the page? I currently don't have time at the moment to do so myself. --Coredesat 04:21, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is the anon who placed the latest tag on the "Akisha Samia" entry. Sorry, I wasn't aware that it had been previously tagged and I didn't have the time to go through the proper procedure. I assume I need to register with Wikipedia to list the article at AFD? Thanks for informing me of my error and also for making a proper AFD listing for this entry. I hate to rain on someone's effort at creative writing, but there's no place for something like that on a site dedicated to useful, relevent information. Okay, I'm done babbling. Thanks again.74.12.134.225 08:13, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Book dbs

[edit]

Thanks for the help, and of course we'll see it on AfD, and if you know of any real magazine etc references it will help all the more. I'm going to take a quick look too,of course. DGG 05:47, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Belleville, Ontario

[edit]

I'm sorry, where is your reference as to whether Jason Tam is not an attorney or civil rights activist? I would appreciate it if you would not delete that entry because its improper to assume. The entry was updated since December and only recently been deleted. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Matnosaj (talkcontribs) 15:14, 4 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Frankly...

[edit]

Just because there are no internet references (non-internet references can be cited), there is no reason your arrogance should delete a person from a notable person list. Jason Tam is an accomplished attorney and is an active Asian American attorney. This information is for the world and there is no reason why I should have to prove it to you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Matnosaj (talkcontribs) 15:27, 4 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Terry deRoy Gruber

[edit]

Hi! I was wondering why my submission on Terry deRoy Gruber was deleted. Thanks!

Emily Drennan emilydrennan@hotmail.com —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gruberphotographers (talkcontribs) 15:29, 4 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

The audacity...

[edit]

Now I've cited to sources and you have again deleted it. Apparently you are deleting just for spite and this type of abuse is not necessary for the Wikipedia world. For a person who is not FROM Belleville, you are in no place to edit the article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Matnosaj (talkcontribs) 15:44, 4 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Steve Barakatt deletion

[edit]

You recently speedied the Steve Barakatt (it had been speedy three time before) in spite of my {{holdon}}, and the article is up again. I'm a little confused why claims of notability weren't discussed given the holdon and talk page edits. Anyway, an anon brought the article back. I'm not sure if its the same anon, as the article was deleted, so there is no edit history, but if you still think it should be deleted, perhaps putting it through AfD would be more fair. That way if the consensus is to delete, it can be protected from immediate recreation... Best, Smmurphy(Talk) 16:05, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad...

[edit]

that you have decided to get others to delete my entries. I can't believe you are so arrogant and racist that you would delete information regarding a successful Asian minority and his hometown. Very childish and immature.

Burgz33

[edit]

Another editor has alerted me to the return of this blocked user via sockpuppet. The puppet is 15x2+3. I've looked at the edit history and other than removing a sock tag on this user page no "damage" has been done. Though there is no doubt it's the same user which means he is creating more socks to circumvent a block. Yankees76 22:52, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

London Heliport

[edit]

Yes, I'm good with that. Thanks. --Tagishsimon (talk)

Re:Signature

[edit]

THANKS A BUNCH HOLMES! I was waiting for a mamacita-editor to ask me that! Then I could have answered the question hésé.... :Y But to answer your question, the Association of the Mamacitas of Rama's Arrow (RAISSEXY - ya I know, but they insist on using this acronym) is my reliable source for this. However, this may not conform to a neutral point of view and may be a conflict of interest as it does not include former mamacitas, one-night-stands, pretty sisters and best friends of former mamacitas... The latter group may prefer it if this were not a case of a biography of a "living" person, but that's their POV... Back to the point, my instinct is to report you at WP:PAIN, but I'm not a vindictive guy. RAISSEXY might choose to pursue this matter, however and I can't speak for them... Rama's arrow (just a sexy boy) 00:37, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of symbols

[edit]

However we aren't comparing nations, we are comparing Statoids. And ones on the same continent too. If there was a list of Australian state symbols or list of French region symbols we'd link to that too. There is no common cat for Can Prov symbols and US state symbols but clearly they represent a related phenomenon. Kevlar67 03:34, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quite agree there should be a centralized page for sub-national symbols. But until there is, a web of links will have to do. Kevlar67 03:21, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vancouver Harbour Water Aerodrome

[edit]

I'm afraid this isn't my area of expertise or a usual topic I edit so forgive me. My main fault with the article was the fact that the coordinates landed within the water. Would 49" 16' 26.44 N 123" 07' 08.90 W the location of the dock or 49" 17' 09.54 N 123" 06' 45.95 W the 200 Granville Street location of the control tower be more appropriate? RichMac (Talk) 06:03, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An hour to reply on wikipedia is pretty good, I've waited days to weeks for updates. Anyway the 49° 17' 26.44" N 123° 07' 08.90" W for the dock and 49°17' 09.54" N 123°06' 45.95" W is formatted better for Google Earths liking. Put down a 16 instead of 17 on the first one. Don't know where aerodrome coordinates are usually pointed, so I'll leave it in your hands. Thanks. RichMac (Talk) 07:07, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good to me. Thanks for taking the time. RichMac (Talk) 07:47, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

from 'Nosexual' again
please may i make myself clear
1. im not bothered about people knowing my age
2. i didnt attack editors
3. i didnt attack people in my school, i said the truth. i was doing them a favour
4. please may you send me my page by any means necessary so i can edit it to make it suitable then save it again or is it lost forever?

Baffin Island

[edit]

Your edit looks fine to me. However, I know next to nothing about harp seals. I just happened on the article and noticed that floe was misspelled, then decided to fix the unnecessary capitalizing of animals' names as well. Deor 12:17, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is it just me or does this ip look like a vandalbot? It is editing much too fast for one person... --KZ Talk Contribs 09:50, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: The 1985 deletion

[edit]

Well here's press http://www.epitonic.com/index.jsp?refer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.epitonic.com%2Fartists%2Fthe1985.html http://www.bettawreckonize.com/album_reviews/alrev_numbers.html http://www.last.fm/music/The+1985 http://www.fakejazz.com/reviews/solex.shtml

Charting on college radio http://www.wprb.com/printplaylist.php?show_id=5 http://www.wmbr.org/cgi-bin/track?d=2000&g=Rock http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/wxyc-playlists/2000/000062.html http://kalx.berkeley.edu/charts/monthly/200010.htm

Anything else? They had a write up in Spin and The Wire in like 2000 (sorry, not the easiest band name to google. And due to the time they were around, a lot of press was pre-internet), but I can contact a band memeber for more press clippings if you like. I'm just confused as to why you would set up a link, then deny someone to adding content to that empty link. I just thought that since I knew a bit about the band, I'd help out. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tremblehand (talkcontribs) 17:43, 6 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

The 1985

[edit]

OK, benefit of doubt then? Thanks for the info. MackSalmon 22:00, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

James Arreak

[edit]

Hi,

I was going through adding some biography's to mid 70's NWT MLAs, and I noticed that someone named James Arreak was elected to the Legislative Assembly for Baffin Central in 1979. I am wondering if this is the same James Arreak currently in the Nunavut assembly, the thing that makes me confused is the article lists a 1968 birth date I can't find confirmation of. If this was the same James Areeak that would mean he was elected at 11 years old and became mayor of Clyde River at 14 years old such as the article states which i doubt. Do you have anyway of finding out if there is 1 or 2 Jame's Areeak's? --Cloveious 00:33, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MLB Records

[edit]

I'm sorry, I mis-read your changes somehow. I see you reverted back to your first version, and that seems fine. Be aware, meanwhile, that some guy named Ron Liebman, along with various IP addresses, keep attempting to push this idea that hitters' streaks should not be considered to be interrupted by military service. That is strictly his/their opinion, it has no bearing on MLB's rules and certainly no place in wikipedia. It could be true for a personal streak, but not for MLB overall, which did not shut down operations during WWII. Just letting you know about this ongoing hassle (also with birthdates, such as Christy Mathewson) in case you get entangled in it. d:) Wahkeenah 21:30, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Actually, I had attempted a revert to your first version, but my changes did not appear, which means your second version exactly matched your first version. Perfect. Meanwhile, if you look at User:Ron liebman's "contributions", you'll see that he's messing around with a lot of date-related stuff, all of it based on information he allegedly found in hard-to-reach sources. That is against wiki rules, and I've already asked an admin about it. The guy might be right, but he's not providing any verifiable documentation, and his stuff about the streaks casts a shadow of doubt over all of his edits. So far I've only reverted Mathewson and Casey Stengel, but he's done a lot more of them, and refuses to respond to questions to him, which also casts doubt on his worthiness as an editor. Wahkeenah 21:52, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop blanking edits.

[edit]

These are constructive and insightful edits you have been blanking. Please stop. I hope I don't have to tell a higher admin about this. My guess is you're just going to delete this anyway. 70.239.214.254 19:22, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop, I have had proper sources for all these edits, and all you're doing is vandalizing Wikipedia by reverting these. I'm trying to be civil with you. 69.150.84.232 19:39, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stop blanking without a valid reason then, it doesn't have as source but has the {{fact}} tag by it. Also, I had a source from ufc.com for Phil Baroni's height/weight, yet you reverted it. 69.150.84.232 19:49, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

infobox again

[edit]

I'd like to avoid an edit war on this, so do you think you could step in before it starts up again? As you may recall, less than 3 weeks ago we discussed this and 4 editors agreed on the header - one editor who hadn't participated in that discussion is objecting now, but instead of waiting for discussion went in and made the change according to his preference. I think it should be reverted and discussed, and let's see if the thinking of the editors has changed in the last 3 weeks or if others weigh in, and go with consensus. I thought a neutral admin might be a better person to say so, as I was involved in the last discussion. Thanks Tvoz |talk 00:27, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Terry deRoy Gruber

[edit]

Hi! So how can I change the article so it can be added? The source is from Terry Gruber himself, not a textbook. How can I attribute that?

Also, can you send me or paste the page I created? I didn't think I would have a problem with it and did not get a chance to save it before it was deleted. Thanks.

emilydrennan@hotmail.com —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gruberphotographers (talkcontribs) 21:02, 9 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Editting user's page

[edit]

Were my editting harmful or insulting to the users..?? OF COURSE NOT!! So, why did you send me the warning...i have no idea

About Film categorization

[edit]

Please, see the discussion in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Films/Categorization. I have spent most of the day today repairing the Category:Canadian films. It is our Canadian film index and we need it to include all films. The same is done for all country films. Please discuss. Hoverfish Talk 22:26, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This thing about reducing categories is only one way of looking at things. My understanding so far is that it is true in some cases whereas in others it is good to keep all inclusive categories. It has even been very seriously proposed that all films are attributed Category:Films, which (category) I have personally worked to reduce to a minimum. For the time being, WP Films consensus has rejected this mega-category proposal. I have worked in several gigantic film lists and list series and I find it most important to have all inclusive categories by country (which is the way things were being organized in films before I joined Wikipedia). Trying to create a list for it would be extremely shaky and already we get the argument "That's what categories are for". So we do lists for where intersections may get too diverse and we try to make them as informative as possible, as the AfD's are coming from all directions lately. Even if you don't agree, I hope you see there are serious problems behind all this and we are doing what we can to combine categories, lists and navigation templates to meet the needs. There is also progress being done in software that enables a fast listing of any category intersection. Well, this is not yet, but the moment it is applied, a lot will change in the categorization logic. Hoverfish Talk 23:04, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, have you seen Lists of films#By letter & number? It took us a very very long time to it set up. As for keeping it updated... Now to do the same for all countries and to keep such a mega series of lists proprely updated and maintained... We would need to create multiple task forces only for this. And film gnomes don't usually stay too long on one line (in my experience). We are just in the middle of creating the Lists of films#By region and country of origin, which is by country arranged by decades and years. If it looks simple simple from the outside, I can reassure you it's not as easy when you are trying to coordinate it and work for it from the inside. I will consider your suggestion however. Being in the middle of all this work shouldn't make one blind to new ideas. Hoverfish Talk 23:22, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have tried to get AWB but my system has a glitch and doesn't download it (though I've been approved). So until I reinstall Windows... This new software development, when it gets ready, will do this for everyone, without the need of special browsers, plus much more. Let's hope they get it ready soon. It will save us plenty of work. Late here now (UTC+2). I'll be glad to discuss things further in the next occasion. Cheers! Hoverfish Talk 23:31, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work!

[edit]

fastest block (User:Quickblues) I've ever seen, if there was a Barnstar for this I'd give it to you--Speed Air Man 18:04, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What do I do next?

[edit]

Sorry to bug you about this but you were the first admin involved in this. I did a RFC on the city issue on Halifax, Nova Scotia. I went and found references, not the least of which being an Act of the Legislature. I have tried direct contact, I have tried pubic dialog, I have suggest compromises that are closer to the truth than we have now, but not what I would like to see. Lonewolf BC just doesn't care. What do I do now? He just broke the 3RR again on the Halifax, NS page, there are at least four users who he has reverted the same edit on. Who do I complaint to, what do I do? Help me find a way through this. WayeMason 18:38, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thats good as far as it goes, but the page is factually incorrect, his only source secondary source and we have two primary sources that refute it. Do I do a RFC/user? WayeMason 21:12, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Let me be clearer then, I was asking for guidance, as an admin... not for you to take sides. What is the appropriate escalation if users are unable to reach consensus? WayeMason 22:08, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
God, that is so much easier... why didn't I notice that in 2+ years of editing? BahahahaWayeMason 22:49, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What?

[edit]

Sir, I have recieved a mesage from you regarding an edit I did not make. Not only did you do this, you also used slanderous language, I will be talking to your superiors about this, as you do NOT deserve to have previlages on this site if you intend to abuse them —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 142.162.208.158 (talkcontribs) 23:28, 10 April 2007.

Oh no! I'm doomed!!!!!! CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 23:35, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User Kirbytime requesting Child Pornography pictures again

[edit]

Hi CambridgeBayWeather: You had warned User:Kirbytime that if he made one more request for Child Pornography pictures he would blocked. Well he is at it again. Another user was disturbed by his repeated trolling and commented there ([2]). Thanks, --Matt57 (talkcontribs) 01:43, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now he's trying to 'mask' this behavior of his by showing interest in pictures of other stuff too: [3], [4] so later he can protest "I've shown interest in all pictures, not just in this case"). Definitely a troll as many have rightly called him and a dangerous one. --Matt57 (talkcontribs) 13:21, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I blocked Kirbytime for 48 hours given the fact you previously warned him about this. I can't look into this more at the moment, but that 48 hours isn't set in stone as far as I'm concerned...--Isotope23 17:37, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. The 48 was to buy some time for a discussion. I don't have the capacity to look into his edit further, but if you feel a longer block for disruption is warrented, feel free to refactor.--Isotope23 20:00, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have a cookie! :)

[edit]

For your excellent work at tracking down the sources behind the hoax in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Repives, I thought that the very least I could do was offer a nice cookie. I have to admit that I was starting to find them pretty convincing until you did your digging! Thanks and cheers, Xtifr tälk 08:14, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Abdalqadir as-Sufi

[edit]

Hi

Thanks for you clean up on the above mentioned article. However, just to let you know that it should really be be Shaykh Muhammad ibn al-Habib and not sidi Muhammad.

Could you also please tell me how we could further improve this article to improve the rating? I am new to this and your advice would be appreciated.

ciao JoeSanchez 12:33, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Hi

Thanks for all your input, it is greatly appreciated.

The title Shaykh/Sheihk has a variety of meanings and connotations within the Arabic language and the Islamic realm. It is correct that the Shaykh of Tarbiyah is linked to the Shaykh of Sufism article because this is linked to the Islamic science of Tassawuf, which is the science, of the striving of the self to attain knowledge of god. This endeavour is usually pursued under the guidance of a Shaykh. In lay terms the title Sheihk, when referring to an Islamic scholar refers to someone qualified in some of the other sciences, such as Fiqh (Jurisprudence), Hadith (Traditions) and so forth. Shaykh ibn al-Habib was firstly a scholar or fiqh and latter become a Shaykh of Instruction. After which he guided many people on the path or tariqah.

It is strange how you read something often and then still miss things, I thought I mentioned that he was conferred his Doctorate by the University of Malaysia in 2000. Will update soon.

ciao thanks again for all your help Joe

Cordyceps Page

[edit]

Hi!

I was wondering if you were moderating this page and if you are why you removed the herbasin database.

I am not sure what constitutes a "corporate" entity in terms of external links and why they are illegal in Wikipedia.

Thank you for your time! Michael —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Livinginspired (talkcontribs) 14:31, 12 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

semi-protect

[edit]

Have you thought of having your userpage semi-protected? You seem very popular with the trolls! Sophia 18:17, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh...

[edit]

Well Mr. CambridgeBayWeather, I didn't know I couldn't submit the life story of my cousin and his family. I thought Wikipedia was an anyone can submit anything deal as long as it's not something that you wouldn't regularly see anywhere else.

So...what would I have to do to be able to put it up? Or...is there a way I can put it up again and you can tell me what I need to do to have it put up? I have a hard time reading guidelines because of non-specific reasons.

Thank you very much and I'm sorry for being a total shitface to the other two guys.

Sincerely, Roberto (Rodolfo's cousin)

User page

[edit]

No problem, it was just a sighting as I was passing by. Extranet (Talk | Contribs) 11:43, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hm?

[edit]

I was wondering why? The article's on my list for some reason, and I can't remember why. Splash - tk 23:37, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so I figured out why I'm watching it, but it's for reasons unrelated. Splash - tk 23:41, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Um, I was wondering why you removed the "no date of birth" category. The article is missing one. Is there a reason I don't know/remember? Splash - tk 23:53, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, great, thanks. Just wasn't sure if there was a reason. Can be quite hard to tell the living from the dead online, after all....! Splash - tk 14:43, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

76.80.62.137

[edit]

You're completely right. I've unblocked him. Sorry about that! Khoikhoi 02:49, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi, I am writing to clarify the purpose behind my adding a link to the independent database on the medicinal research done on Lingzhi, Maitake, Shiitake, and Cordyceps. I want as many people as possible to learn about the many potential health benefits traditional medicinal mushrooms have to offer. I acknowledge that I am deeply passionate about medicinal mushrooms, which is why I started my business in the first place, and hope a person visiting my site takes the time to check out the various pages on my site, in doing so they may decide to buy products I sell online. However, the link I have been adding to relevant pages is to a section of my site that is 100% independent research which has been researched and organized by The Alternative Medicine Foundation (http://www.amfoundation.org/) which maintains a database on numerous herbs with well researched scientific value. Their database charges a fee for access which helps support their ongoing work to keep the information presented up to date (and impartial) but I wanted to increase the availability of this information to the public while also helping to market my business and lease the right to display those specific independently maintained database files on my site which are presented on my site directly from their database.

If you have any further questions about my replacing the links on my site please contact me to discuss your reasons for objecting to my link (and just so you know, the link I placed to Aloha Medicinals website was based on my positive professional experiences with them and have no financial benefit from people visiting their site).

Thank you for your time, David "ReishiDave"

David Demarest Green Mountain Mycosystems, LLC P.O. Box 191, Underhill Center, VT 05490 (802)355-6637 david@vermontmushrooms.com

CambridgeBayWeather, thanks for getting back to me so quickly and trying your best to delete spam links while also recognizing good links. David

medical evacuation

[edit]

Medevac point taken - I should have checked more carefully. With regard to Air Nunavut, which you didn't mention, but I assume you are referring to, Flight International (27 March 2007) quotes: 3 King Air 200, 1 Dassault Falcon 10 and 1 Dassault Falcon 100. I didn't change the fleet entry as I assumed the current reference to be official and more accurate. With regard to First Air, Flight International (3 April 2007) quote: 7 ATR 42-300, 3 BAe 748 Series 2A, 2 Boeing 727-200F, 2 Boeing 737-200, 3 Boeing 737-200C and 2 L-100-30 Hercules. Hope this is useful. Ardfern 06:57, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

medical evacuation

[edit]

Happy for both sets of references to be included. I will add the FI references over the next while Ardfern 09:05, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

David Belle

[edit]

Ha! I was wondering how to handle that crazy addition to David Belle. I see that you had no such restraint. :) --Knulclunk 21:13, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sound Transmission Class

[edit]

You recently did a revert on STC. I tried to edit the page, linking the 'Hz' symbol to the 'Hertz' page and the page editor cut off half the article. This is not the first time this has happened. If you don't mind, could you revert the page again? I don't like leaving it like that. Also, since you have a lot more experience on Wikipedia than I do, do you have any ideas why it's cutting off the page like that? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 155.97.8.144 (talk) 02:14, 16 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Strange. There used to be something about that when using Firefox but I'm not sure. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 02:19, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
See Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#Pages being truncated. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 02:24, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks

[edit]

Thank you for reverting vandalism on my personal page. I hope someone will block that anonymous PID. Pierre cb 11:51, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Me too, thanks! :D --TheCoffee 03:53, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just in case you forgot...

[edit]

I don't think you're very well liked in this world. Am I right? Jaymaese 21:49, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Be warned about WP:NPA Jaymaese. If you come to address a issue with him, do it civilly. --KzTalkContribs 11:14, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CZTB

[edit]

It appears to be a weather station. Vidioman 02:27, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Woah that was fast...

[edit]

User:216.86.96.10... I was going to go and revert the edits he made and give warnings... but before I could even get the second warning off... already blocked and then I checked his 'contributions' -- there all reverted! geez. Please, whats your secret? MrMacMan Talk 07:55, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I should probably try to learn to use a script like that, seems more and more tedious work can be automated. Thanks for the links. MrMacMan Talk 08:08, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Singidunum University

[edit]

This is my first article. I need samo time to learn how to work with Wiki. Please be patience. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by University-Singidunum (talkcontribs) 10:54, 17 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Joka#####whatever

[edit]

It's just someone having a good time. No need to be toooooo beurocratic about asking them to stop. --12:19, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Brett Lee vandal

[edit]

Thanks. It's an old pattern, isn't it. "I insist the article is written in a certain way and when I find out no-one else disagrees with me and there are indeed policies and guidelines against me, erm, I know! I'll vandalise the article!" Sigh. What a waste of effort. --Dweller 13:37, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Bartman

[edit]

Could you please put in the article that cubs fans will never forget what he did,but we forgave him for is actions Intermisun7 16:08, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request

[edit]

Hi, a little while ago you blocked a sockpuppet of Matthvm I pointed out. Any chance you could look into whether Sonyuser is one also? He has a lot of the same habits, and is stirring up trouble here and there as usual. Also, one of Matthvm's former sockpuppets was similarly called Compaquser. Thanks! Sprocket 21:36, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to the deletion log you deleted the article Jonathan Hey. Where can I found the discussion related to the AfD process? Thanks in advance for your help. --ThT 03:22, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

moved from User talk:ThT#Jonathan Hey: It was deleted as a WP:PROD and not as an AfD. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 04:03, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. According to the deletion log the article had been undeleted before (01:17, 18 December 2006). In WP:PROD#How it works it says: "Articles that [...] Have previously been undeleted [...] are not candidates for {{prod}}." If I understand that right, the article could be undeleted again? If so, please restore the article to my user space. If not, please help me to understand what I can do else. --ThT 17:38, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
moved from User talk:ThT#Jonathan Hey: No problem. You missed the line "Articles deleted under this procedure (using the {{prod}} tag) may be undeleted, without further discussion, on a reasonable request." I put it at User:ThT/Jonathan Hey. It looks a bit odd as there is something wrong with the infobox. Also for now I put ":" in front of the categories to stop your user page getting listed. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 23:02, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. But the Talk Page is missing (or somewhere else?), and the former Page history as well. Thanks in advance for fixing this. I'll not start editing before you tell me it's ok. --ThT 23:29, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, everything is fine now. --ThT 23:42, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Who knows what they are talking about

[edit]

dude.. thanks for deleting my entry that took several hours to write.. *sarcasm* Aredotwice 08:09, 18 April 2007 (UTC){{subst:Aredotwice|user name|08:05, 18 April 2007}}[reply]

deletion

[edit]

dude.. *thanks* for deleting my entry that took several hours to write.. *sarcasm* do you have a life? it's 1AM and you're still reading/deleting articles? good job. i hope someone deletes your page. Aredotwice 08:09, 18 April 2007 (UTC)aredotwice—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Aredotwice (talkcontribs) 08:06, 18 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Your delete of Happy Kitchen

[edit]

Please restore the article. It is a ubisoft product and it has a release date of May. Here is a website with it Here is another one There is not really any info on it but it is a real game.Pendo4 is here...Look around...hello???...I am here... 20:51, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hamilton Airport

[edit]

Hi CambridgeBay,

I have added the ground transportation category tho the John C Munro Hamilton International Airport posting because these are two service that are now offered in partnership with the airport.

Thanks, hishuttle

Cashistees / Kashisties

[edit]

On April 14th you deleted Kashisties which also had a redirect from Cashistees. Please delete the now resurrected "Cashistees" page as well. Gruber76 15:31, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

why delete the..

[edit]

why do you constantly delete the notable people in the Isaq Section?

I mean u leave the darod notables, so why delete our? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mokonono (talkcontribs) 16:59, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

The question isn't addressed to me, but on a related note, I have partially restored the list in question at Isaaq. Most of the list consisted of redlinks, while others were listed two, three, even four times. I cleaned up the list and now there are exactly four individuals. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 17:49, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Craig Woodland and Derrick Brassington

[edit]

I am not and never been either of these people. I dont not like them, and they are not my friends!!!!! What are you doing??? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Boratmakesexytimewithmotherinlaw (talkcontribs) 10:28, 21 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

What do you have against the ULC? Jesse G. James was reverted. I put the source in the summary line. I also added a source to the list for the few I re-added. GreenJoe 17:58, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Why is Cork-Spotters.com constantly removed by you? It provides up-to-date news, which the wikipedia site does not. There is also a decent photo gallery of aircraft in Cork.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cork Airport (talkcontribs) 20:27, 21 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]


Agreed- This website has valuable information on Cork which wiki does not provide. If you are going deleting such links there are thousands of other wiki pages which such links you might like to get scouring :P

Please review

[edit]

This [[5]] may need a comment from you as today there was another outbreak of attacks from socks of user Burgz33. Thanks. Quartet 00:36, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Follow up

[edit]

As it looks like you know whats happening here, do you mind following this user and their edits. Maybe a little discussion could get him to stop editing too much. Many thanks, Extranet (Talk | Contribs) 07:00, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is especially hard and confusing to watch on the recent changes when you are vandal fighting. Extranet (Talk | Contribs) 22:51, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds interesting. Good luck with that. Extranet (Talk | Contribs) 23:03, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Grover?

I need your help...again.

[edit]

Seeing your the only admin I readily know, I got stung with a 3RR for Lupin III due to the overzealous original research insertations of an anonymous user and my acts to get it deleted. My query is this: Am I allowed to add {{fact}} to the article and not get banned for 24 Hours? Also, would I violate 3RR if I also removed the line That's not it for Lupin references in that show, however! due to weasel wording? --293.xx.xxx.xx 05:53, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As to the "That's not it for Lupin references in that show, however!" it really is not encyclopedic and should be re-written. Any chance that I could suggest and you can edit it out, or is that violating by proxy? --293.xx.xxx.xx 07:55, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

deleting article in beirut: camille allam ,krikorian and other lebanese artists

[edit]

These articles are about Lebanese artists that are very active on the lebanese art scene. May be the subject was not completed or was not developed enough. My goal was to let other wikipedians,specially lebanese, add to these articles(and create new ones on the lebanon artists subject). Thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Beyrouth (talkcontribs) 10:03, 23 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Press articles,first time creations,public recognition,notable exhebitions are features for visual artists,which is i think is different from the musical scene artists.

Hamilton Airport - Ground Transportation

[edit]

I have recevied a message from Hishuttle - note the username, and there is no user or talk pages - regarding my reversion of his re-addition of web links to Ground Transportation, including a firm called hishuttle.

Have a look as the entry on my talk page. I have a very uneasy feeling about this as I feel there is an attempt to use Wikipedia for advertising.

My feeling looking at other airports - Glasgow International Airport, London Heathrow Airport, O'Hare International Airport have no mention about ground transportation; Toronto Pearson International Airport mentions ground transportation, with a section giving details including Blue22.

I would like to think my fears are unfounded, and would value your opinion. --Stewart 17:53, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Abuse/Slander on Dublin Airport

[edit]

Hello

On http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Dublin_Airport#IP_Addresses

Someone has been posting abuse/slander towards me telling me 'To get a life' and that I was a 'Faggot'

Is there any thing you can do to block/ban this person? The Ip's are on its history page..


cheers


Cheers for the reply and assistance --Splash15hotel 20:31, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So what if I just delete your page on a regular basis. How would you like that?

What is wrong with the article Roosevelt the Recliner?

Abuse on user page

[edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Splash15hotel

The persistant vandal posting on Dublin airport article has posted abusive comments on my user page

Can something be done possibly?

Question from Iceflow

[edit]

Hi CambridgeBayWeather. I was wondering whether I could ask for your assistance, I was speaking on IRC today with a user called Karynn, who was discussing things which have been passed on through the OTRS, as complaints or issues about editing. She has informed me that my name is "Familiar" to her, in her words, and that she recalls me having a "black mark" against me. I have never been formally warned for anything on Wikipedia, so I am mystified at to how I got this "black mark" and I need to find out.

As this is dealt with by the administration, I would assume, I need to ask for assistance from an admin to get help. I want to find out what I was black marked for, and why.

I am currently known as Iceflow, previously as Tmalmjursson, and have been editing Wikipedia since September 2004.

Thanks for your help,

Thor Malmjursson 15:40, 24 April 2007 (UTC) Talk with the 'flow[reply]

Yeah, sometimes the prod tags don't subst quite correctly. I'm sure I had a reason. Anyway, I probably did it because he appears to be non-notable, but I didn't want to prejudice against recreation, as nominating this type of person for AFD usually only gets a few comments anyway, and those comments are equally as uninformed as I am. Besides, after AFD, recreation is prohibited. Thus a prod works just as well, IMHO. So, if I get your permission, I might just go ahead and re-prod it. Part Deux 17:21, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete this article??? Krystian 18:18, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

noonan

[edit]

why did u delete the piece on domenyk noonan currently being in jail? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.13.151.111 (talk) 19:49, 24 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

The article is about a living person and unsourced. I wanted to remove the odd looking piece about his name change to "Lattlay Fottfoy". CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 07:58, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pimp My Ride question.

[edit]

I went back to this page to do a little bit of cleanup, and I noticed that another editor not only deleted my reference marks and a few additional info to at least one car, but I noticed several "Notices" interlaced into the article that I find questionable.

On the first line to US Version =

  • <!---- Please do not link one of the cars that are not shown in this article ---->

Right after Season 4 line =

  • <!--- Do not link vehicles that has no articles, such as the Chevrolet Panel Van. Any ridiculous edits such as linking fictioal vehicles will result a 2 week block. --->

Embedded into Season 6 =

  • <!---- Do not link the vehicle names without first putting the car owner's name and the vehicle's year. Also, do not link vehicles that has no articles. Any unsourced edits such as adding ridiculous episodes that was not aired will cause either anonymous or newly registered users will result a 4 month block. ---->

Now i'm kinda stumped, can this guy do that?--293.xx.xxx.xx 19:52, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, found solace here. Apologies if I inconvienced you.--293.xx.xxx.xx 01:02, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Play for Blood

[edit]

I am the author of Play for Blood, an article that you deleted. It does exist and was produced at Loyola University New Orleans last April. Can the article please be reinstated?

Thank you, Kevin V. Smith —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 208.252.128.13 (talk) 20:07, 24 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Restored, reasonable request as per WP:PROD. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 07:58, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]

Please find references for the Alan Cadby edits you made:

There is no record in Hansard (www.parliament.wa.gov.au) or the media of Mr Cadby speaking on the one-vote-one-value legislation before he lost preselection. The legislation that Mr Cadby supported created what is known as dummy voters in the far north of WA. These dummy voters have the effect of creating a gerrymander in regional WA. There are numerous references to these dummy voters creating a rural gerrymander in Hansard and the Western Australian media.

The Labor government's own media statement of 30th March 2005 also states that the north of WA will be exempt from provisions in the one vote one value legislation ie the legislation Mr Vadby supported kept a rural gerrymander in some parts of WA: 'Mr McGinty said that the legislation would protect the five existing seats in the Mining and Pastoral Region...' [ie in these areas the rural gerrymander will remain]

The facts can be verified at www.parliament.wa.gov.au and search using 'one vote one value AND cadby' and then 'one vote one value AND dummy'.

Also, there are numerous references in Hansard to the Liberal Party policy of allowing its MPs to cross the floor. This means the statement 'Cadby had been bound to oppose the legislation as a member of the Liberal Party' to be a false and flawed statement. It is only ALP members who must abide by caucaus decisions.

Other references highlighting Liberal MPs have the right to cross the floor and vote against their Party: http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200610/s1755780.htm http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2006/s1711010.htm http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/downer-backs-mps-right-to-cross-the-floor/2005/08/15/1123957991790.html

There are also numerous State Liberal MPs who have exercised their right to cross the floor including Ross Lightfoot (over milk deregulation and Sue Walker (over the closing of a palliative care centre in her electorate). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 124.178.113.186 (talkcontribs) 10:53, 25 April 2007.

Archive of Post-Ambient talk at Ambient?

[edit]

You deleted Post-Ambient with the following edit summary "08:02, 24 April 2007 CambridgeBayWeather (Talk | contribs) deleted "Post-Ambient" (PRod:No references or sources... No real content... not notable... no consensus to keep...)".
I have no significant disagreement with your summary. One user wanted to do research for sources, as he said the Post-Ambient concept was under discussion within the related music community. He can still do that research while the article is deleted. However, I think it's useful to archive that article's talk page whether or not the article or concept gets revived.
As an admin I think you have acccess to the deleted material. I suggest that the Post-Ambient talk page should be archived as a subpage at Ambient, and I would (boldly) do this if I had access. (Please reply here if desired) Milo 16:10, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...
Ok, thanks for undeleting only Talk:Post-Ambient. I didn't know that the useful talk page could be undeleted separately from the unencyclopedic article. Milo 00:55, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.

[edit]

I appreciate the revert on my user page. I never cease to be amazed that an individual who makes no constructive edits, who is warned and warned again and again to knock it off, vandalizes the page(s) of editors who are doing the warning. What a waste of energy all around. Like we have nothing better to do. Alas... and on it goes this thing of ours. Cheers! ---Charles 15:04, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bunky Miller page

[edit]

I am the one who put the page online, I can understand why the page was removed on the grounds that it was unsourced. I should have followed the link on the bottom of the page and seen if there was more information on him, or at the very least linked to IMDB. Maybe I thought someone else would have researched it, and unfortunately, no one did.

I did think that being the last contestant voted off before 9/11 would carry some notability, but it didn't. I guess no one remembers it as much as the first one voted off after that (can't remember the name right now).

Well, thank you, Alan, and good luck. - Desmond Hobson 22:14, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. What an interesting puzzle you've put together!

Hey hows it going!

[edit]

This is a just a positive message complimenting you on all the effort you put into making wikipedia a better place. I hope everything's fine and if you have any random questions or problems I talk to you.--Wayne Neptune 23:52, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don & Bronson

[edit]

i just made a page and u just deleted it.. i'd just like to know why?? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pocodolce (talkcontribs) 11:38, 28 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

It was a violation of WP:CSD G11, which according to the block log, was blatant advertising for a site. [6] --Kzrulzuall TalkContribs 11:41, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

...but one war at a time I think. These fans of children's programmes are pretty bellicose.--Mel Etitis (Talk) 11:46, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough (I hadn't looked to see who was involved). I'm trying to establish some sort of consensus on this sort of case at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kept Man, if you want to comment there. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 17:16, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete the Cranborne Middle School article?

[edit]

The Emmanuel CofE Middle School one is allowed so how come? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Emperor Jackal (talkcontribs) 14:00, 28 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Universal Life Church members

[edit]

I find it odd that you would go out of your way to remove those categories instead of just putting in the citation. There's a lot of them, and I am just one person, I haven't had time to go through each of them, and add the citation, which is why the summary tag was easier. As for George Harrison, I don't know, I didn't create the category. --GreenJoe 15:30, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The citations are in the edit history. That's how I am doing them. I had put them sources in the edit summary. As for Google, some of them it was relatively easy. I searched with "Person's name"+"Universal Life Church". I got fairly accurate results fairly quick. For some I didn't find anything, and didn't revert them. Anyway, I'm working on them now. --GreenJoe 15:46, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
They should all be cited now, and any that aren't, not in the list. I added the category to articles that were missing it. GreenJoe 16:10, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have just removed these links. Even though they may appear in the lists of the Universal Life Church I believe they are still spam. There is no indication that any member of the Beatles studied or even expressed a desire to be a member, but that it was simply bestowed upon them. It cannot be proven that the individual is aware that they are members, or that they would agree if they did. Since there is no reason why any group or organisation can not make any person an honorary member, it is a spurious title and there is no reason to link to any of them. I am copying this to GreenJoe's talkpage. LessHeard vanU 18:52, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have you been following the discussion on GreenJoe and my talkpages? Would the suggestion I made re the ULC and Beatles connection (i.e. through an "example" source expanded on the talkpage) be okay? LessHeard vanU 00:11, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think the marginal notability of ULC as regards the Beatles is that an independant source, the University newspaper GreenJoe cited, notes the individual members as being ordained ministers. It seems that while the ULC advertises the fact it has appeared in a third party source. All in all, I think The Beatles' miscellanea would be the ideal place for this minor fact to reside. LessHeard vanU 09:22, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
(cough) I was editing up to 2.00am last night and, by knowledge gained by clicking a link or two on your user page, I am going to appeal to your status as a co-1950's child to forgive my missing the point cos I have only had six and a bit hours sleep... Right, start again.
Since there is a marginal notability of ULC as regards the Beatles, if GreenJoe were to use the independent source in the ULC article that he cited when editing the individual Beatles he would then be able to link to The Beatles' miscellanea. It keeps the trivia out of the ULC page and puts it in a better context in Beatle project space. Would you be happy with this proposal? LessHeard vanU 09:39, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks homey

[edit]

thanks for fixing my userpage. as much as i am pro-genitals, i really dont want them on my userpage. thats really why god created subpages. laters. the_undertow talk 00:07, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hadafo and article Hawiye

[edit]

Thanks for alerting me; it just shows the importance of edit summaries... --Mel Etitis (Talk) 18:18, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a reference for the standardized rain gauge used in India over 2,000 years ago. I didn't change the edit where you said the Korean one was the first, but considering there is a standardized one set up in an official state trade document for tax purposes, it seems to definitely fit the definition of a rain gauge (clearly it would be a "device used to measure the amount of rain that falls in a location").

Rather than revert what you had reverted, I figured it might be worthwhile to leave you a note and ask what you thought. (Right now it looks kind of bad to see these two sentences in a row: "Each of the state storehouses were equipped with a standardised rain gauge to classify land for taxation purposes. In 1441 A.D., Jang Yeong Sil, a Korean scientist, invented the worlds first standardised rain gauge.") Komdori 12:54, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your recent revision; nicely done, I think. Komdori 13:17, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your note on my talk page; I had been completely oblivious to the Indian/Korean edit war before (I'll be careful if I happen to see Korean/Indian discussions on another page). Anyway, the way it is now allows people to have access to both ideas. Komdori 13:26, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]