User talk:Cattleya90

This is Cattleya90's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Msgr. Reynolds Purackal (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Msgr. Reynolds Purackal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 06:20, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Tinamariyam1990, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 06:20, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Msgr. Reynolds Purackal (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

inappropriate tone for an encyclopaedia

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Msgr. Reynolds Purackal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Msgr. Reynolds Purackal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:54, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Msgr. Reynolds Purackal (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hammersoft was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please understand that such articles need to be reviewed with WP:GNG in mind. There needs to be significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources. That's not yet present here. Please find such sources. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 15:48, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Msgr. Reynolds Purackal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Msgr. Reynolds Purackal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hammersoft (talk) 15:48, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Msgr. Reynolds Purackal (September 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hammersoft was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You need to find significant coverage in independent, reliable, secondary sources to support the notability of this person. So far, the cites that have been included are not strong enough to support that. The Hindu article is one, but not very in depth about the person, and the details of catholic saints just lists him. The catholictime link is insecure, and I won't open it for that reason, but even so...find more. --Hammersoft (talk) 18:31, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Msgr. Reynolds Purackal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Msgr. Reynolds Purackal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hammersoft (talk) 18:31, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tinamariyam1990 (talk) 16:33, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Resubmitted with appropriate changes

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tinamariyam1990 (talk) 15:05, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Resubmitted with appropriate changes. Please review.

Disambiguation link notification for November 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Reynolds Purackal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vatican (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Santosh Sivan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack and Jill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:June Malayalam Movie Poster.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:18, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:June Malayalam Movie Poster.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:June Malayalam Movie Poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:37, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Khalid Rahman

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Khalid Rahman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 12:48, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Khalid Rahman. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 12:52, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio

Hi, please do not directly copy material from other sources as you did at Shilpa Manjunath, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 20:27, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sarjano Khalid

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sarjano Khalid requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:29, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Khalid Rahman) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Khalid Rahman.

User:Rosguill while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

This subject barely qualifies for WP:NDIRECTOR, and really needs more citations to independent coverage in reliable sources about Rahman himself.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:35, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khalid Rahman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:57, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Miss Diva - 2019

The article Miss Diva - 2019 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Event never happened; fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 07:06, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Moreover there are no references provided. The article may be kept if some reliable references are added about that the event is going to happen or has been scheduled on any date. That's my opinion. Aafiii (^talk) 07:12, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Universe India 2019 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Miss Universe India 2019, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:58, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brother’s day.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brother’s day.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:And the oscar goes to Poster.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:And the oscar goes to Poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bharyamar Sookshikkuka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A. M. Raja (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not reliable

Silverscreen and Filmibeat are not reliable as per WP:ICTF. Kindly see to it. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:40, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Go through WP:ICTFFAQ as well. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:07, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Thank you Tina ^talk 16:13, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:18, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pre-production

Hi there, re: these changes, please refrain from adding items to a subject's filmography until you can demonstrate that filming has begun. Wikipedia is not in the business of predicting the future, and these announcements, without a tangible product being made, don't serve a useful encyclopedic purpose. This is why we don't create articles about films that have not yet begun filming. See WP:NFF. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:13, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And here, the correct formatting of "Post-Production" is "Post-production". This isn't a proper noun, it is a common noun, and as such, we would only capitalise the first letter if it starts a sentence. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 13:46, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Thank you for correcting it. Tina ^talk 14:51, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary titles

Please don't add unnecessary titles or honorifics as you did here. Gourav Menon is not our "master", he's an actor. We don't need the editorial. Even if he were a doctor or colloquially called "Sri", we would not use those labels. See WP:HONORIFICS. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 13:36, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It was added because that person is a child artist. I have seen pages where ‘baby’ or ‘master’ is added before the name of the child actor in the Indian films. [1],[2],[3],[4],[5]. So, I wasn’t sure about it. Thank you for pointing it out. I will keep that in mind for the future edits. Tina ^talk 16:06, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Marakkar Arabikadalinte Simham poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Marakkar Arabikadalinte Simham poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Zoyafactorposternew.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Zoyafactorposternew.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kannum Kannum Kollaiyadithaal.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kannum Kannum Kollaiyadithaal.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Brother's Day

Hi, hello. Could you please upload a new portrait poster of Brother's Day replacing the current landscape poster. I recommend any of these - [6], [7], [8]. Thank you. 2405:204:D00E:5435:4D9C:E872:856A:8BE4 (talk) 18:19, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brothersdayposter.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brothersdayposter.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Danish Renzu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:34, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Madhura Raja, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 12:39, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

bonadea, That was a mistake when two of us were editing the same page at the same time, so some edits accidentally got reverted, which i have fixed manually.Tina ^talk 12:51, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Zoya Factor New cover.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Zoya Factor New cover.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:51, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Zoya Factor New cover.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Zoya Factor New cover.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:50, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Marakkar Arabikadalinte Simham poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Marakkar Arabikadalinte Simham poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of AhamBrahmasmi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. –Darkwind (talk) 08:46, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Chola film poster.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chola film poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Maniyarayile Ashokan First Look.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Maniyarayile Ashokan First Look.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cattleya90 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I created the Khalid Rahman page long back when I thought that person has directed a few films which was well received.I have no idea about the Ahambrahmasmi account that is mentioned here. Khalid Rahman page is just one among the other pages which I created during this two years time and Unda is’nt created by me, it was already there before I created Khalid Rahman page. I seriously feel that, tagging me as some other account which have done some inappropriate edits just because i created a Wiki page for a director is’nt fair to all the work that i have done in Wikipedia. Also the other edits that is mentioned in the investigation page, I have edited those pages in wikipedia (which are mainly of actors) are because I have created certain film pages, so i added those film names in respective actors filmography. There is nothing to with that other account or person that is mentioned here. I could only ask to review or check my other works to to prove that my account isnt a sock puppet of the mentioned account. This is my only account and I recently changed username because previously I was using my own name. I have been in Wikipedia for 2 years and i have done over 3200+ edits. So i request to see my other contributions too before concluding on this. Tina ^talk 14:37, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser-confirmed sockpuppetry with multiple accounts, plus the probable connection to the prior investigations. Please see WP:STANDARDOFFER. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 16:00, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Administrator note this is a checkuser block (it is not marked as one but I, a checkuser, am saying it is; explanation follows). Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 14:29, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Darkwind and Bbb23: The user is blocked as a sock under Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AhamBrahmasmi, based on a Possible finding by DeltaQuad and Darkwind's behavioural analysis. Can we revisit that? I checked just now and I don't know what DQ saw (could have been older data that's rotated now) but I would call the relationship strongly Unlikely at best: one city in common but different ISPs, no other technical overlap. However I have no doubt that Cattleya90 (who was renamed from Tinamariyam1990 but hasn't updated her signature) created DDLG7 (talk · contribs), they're on the same device on the same IP at the same time. We'll need a good explanation as to why they created that sockpuppet account but unless I've missed something I think their original block was inappropriate. Thoughts? Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 14:29, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In progress.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:47, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I believe Amanda's finding and Darkwind's block reasonable. The following accounts are Confirmed to each other:
- Cattleya
- DDLG7
- D Little things (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
I've reblocked Cattleya as a CU block and blocked D Little things. I've not tagged D Little things or touched the tags already in place on the other two accounts.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:24, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jack N' Jill

The article Jack N' Jill has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreleased film with no independent coverage on production to meet WP:NFF; No scheduled release date and nothing significant found in WP:BEFORE search.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ab207 (talk) 08:49, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]