Jump to content

User talk:Cattleya90

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Msgr. Reynolds Purackal (December 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 06:20, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Tinamariyam1990, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 06:20, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Msgr. Reynolds Purackal (September 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 12:54, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Msgr. Reynolds Purackal (September 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hammersoft was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hammersoft (talk) 15:48, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Msgr. Reynolds Purackal (September 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hammersoft was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hammersoft (talk) 18:31, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
  • You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Tinamariyam1990 (talk) 16:33, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Resubmitted with appropriate changes

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
  • You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Tinamariyam1990 (talk) 15:05, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Resubmitted with appropriate changes. Please review.

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Reynolds Purackal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vatican (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Santosh Sivan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack and Jill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:18, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:June Malayalam Movie Poster.jpeg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:June Malayalam Movie Poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:37, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Khalid Rahman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 12:48, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Khalid Rahman. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 12:52, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio

[edit]

Hi, please do not directly copy material from other sources as you did at Shilpa Manjunath, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 20:27, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sarjano Khalid requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:29, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Khalid Rahman) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Khalid Rahman.

User:Rosguill while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

This subject barely qualifies for WP:NDIRECTOR, and really needs more citations to independent coverage in reliable sources about Rahman himself.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed, Rosguill talk 20:35, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khalid Rahman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:57, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Miss Diva - 2019 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Event never happened; fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 07:06, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Moreover there are no references provided. The article may be kept if some reliable references are added about that the event is going to happen or has been scheduled on any date. That's my opinion. Aafiii (talk) 07:12, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Universe India 2019 moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Miss Universe India 2019, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:58, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brother’s day.jpeg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brother’s day.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:And the oscar goes to Poster.jpeg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:And the oscar goes to Poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bharyamar Sookshikkuka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A. M. Raja (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not reliable

[edit]

Silverscreen and Filmibeat are not reliable as per WP:ICTF. Kindly see to it. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:40, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Go through WP:ICTFFAQ as well. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:07, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. Thank you Tina talk 16:13, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You are welcome. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:18, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pre-production

[edit]

Hi there, re: these changes, please refrain from adding items to a subject's filmography until you can demonstrate that filming has begun. Wikipedia is not in the business of predicting the future, and these announcements, without a tangible product being made, don't serve a useful encyclopedic purpose. This is why we don't create articles about films that have not yet begun filming. See WP:NFF. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:13, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And here, the correct formatting of "Post-Production" is "Post-production". This isn't a proper noun, it is a common noun, and as such, we would only capitalise the first letter if it starts a sentence. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 13:46, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry. Thank you for correcting it. Tina talk 14:51, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary titles

[edit]

Please don't add unnecessary titles or honorifics as you did here. Gourav Menon is not our "master", he's an actor. We don't need the editorial. Even if he were a doctor or colloquially called "Sri", we would not use those labels. See WP:HONORIFICS. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 13:36, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It was added because that person is a child artist. I have seen pages where ‘baby’ or ‘master’ is added before the name of the child actor in the Indian films. [1],[2],[3],[4],[5]. So, I wasn’t sure about it. Thank you for pointing it out. I will keep that in mind for the future edits. Tina talk 16:06, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Marakkar Arabikadalinte Simham poster.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Marakkar Arabikadalinte Simham poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Zoyafactorposternew.jpeg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Zoyafactorposternew.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kannum Kannum Kollaiyadithaal.jpeg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kannum Kannum Kollaiyadithaal.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Brother's Day

[edit]

Hi, hello. Could you please upload a new portrait poster of Brother's Day replacing the current landscape poster. I recommend any of these - [6], [7], [8]. Thank you. 2405:204:D00E:5435:4D9C:E872:856A:8BE4 (talk) 18:19, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brothersdayposter.jpeg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brothersdayposter.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Danish Renzu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:34, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Madhura Raja, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 12:39, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

bonadea, That was a mistake when two of us were editing the same page at the same time, so some edits accidentally got reverted, which i have fixed manually.Tina talk 12:51, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Zoya Factor New cover.jpeg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Zoya Factor New cover.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:51, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Zoya Factor New cover.jpeg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Zoya Factor New cover.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:50, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Marakkar Arabikadalinte Simham poster.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Marakkar Arabikadalinte Simham poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]

Orphaned non-free image File:Chola film poster.jpeg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chola film poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Maniyarayile Ashokan First Look.jpeg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Maniyarayile Ashokan First Look.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cattleya90 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I created the Khalid Rahman page long back when I thought that person has directed a few films which was well received.I have no idea about the Ahambrahmasmi account that is mentioned here. Khalid Rahman page is just one among the other pages which I created during this two years time and Unda is’nt created by me, it was already there before I created Khalid Rahman page. I seriously feel that, tagging me as some other account which have done some inappropriate edits just because i created a Wiki page for a director is’nt fair to all the work that i have done in Wikipedia. Also the other edits that is mentioned in the investigation page, I have edited those pages in wikipedia (which are mainly of actors) are because I have created certain film pages, so i added those film names in respective actors filmography. There is nothing to with that other account or person that is mentioned here. I could only ask to review or check my other works to to prove that my account isnt a sock puppet of the mentioned account. This is my only account and I recently changed username because previously I was using my own name. I have been in Wikipedia for 2 years and i have done over 3200+ edits. So i request to see my other contributions too before concluding on this. Tina talk 14:37, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser-confirmed sockpuppetry with multiple accounts, plus the probable connection to the prior investigations. Please see WP:STANDARDOFFER. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:00, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • @Darkwind and Bbb23: The user is blocked as a sock under Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AhamBrahmasmi, based on a  Possible finding by DeltaQuad and Darkwind's behavioural analysis. Can we revisit that? I checked just now and I don't know what DQ saw (could have been older data that's rotated now) but I would call the relationship strongly  Unlikely at best: one city in common but different ISPs, no other technical overlap. However I have no doubt that Cattleya90 (who was renamed from Tinamariyam1990 but hasn't updated her signature) created DDLG7 (talk · contribs), they're on the same device on the same IP at the same time. We'll need a good explanation as to why they created that sockpuppet account but unless I've missed something I think their original block was inappropriate. Thoughts? Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:29, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Notice

The article Jack N' Jill has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreleased film with no independent coverage on production to meet WP:NFF; No scheduled release date and nothing significant found in WP:BEFORE search.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ab207 (talk) 08:49, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]