User talk:Crusoe8181/Archive 3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search


How is compiling a list of people available for future father son picks from news articles an invasion of privacy? Isn't that exactly the kind of thing lists are for, to compile public domain information on a particular topic in a single accessible location? Thanks for deleting my work, i appreciate it and will never screw up your little fascist bullyboy website again with my contributions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Askaaron (talkcontribs) 06:20, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

My you've been a busy boy![edit]

(First, let's make it clear that I'm not objecting - just commenting ... )
Hmmm. Interesting.
If you look at my talk page, you'll see I've recently decided to get a life. Hence, I'm viewing your edit history with a combination of bemusement AND amusement.
I'm sort-of wondering what value your moves have added, and why you don't have anything better to do with your time.
Feel free to revert this edit if you feel you have better thing to do than comment on my comments - I assure you I won't be offended. Pdfpdf (talk) 11:23, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

...or girlie (Crusoe8181 (talk) 10:17, 9 June 2011 (UTC)).
Oh dear! How sad!! Your response sounds like it's probably very amusing, but I don't understand it! How embarassing do you think that is?!!!!! Pdfpdf (talk) 13:32, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
P.S. I have email enabled, so if you're feeling compassionate enough not to embarass me further in public, you could explain it to me via email ... Pdfpdf (talk) 13:32, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
P.P.S. I don't think anything smaller is readable ... Pdfpdf (talk) 13:32, 9 June 2011 (UTC)


Thanks for saving me the work, have been doing the Queensland ones bit by bit over the years as I've been finishing their articles. Orderinchaos 18:03, 10 June 2011 (UTC)


Hello, there.

This edit just appeared in my watchlist and I figured you might be able to advise me on something. Basically, why did you change the coordinates template from mapit to coord. Please don't think I'm criticising. It's just that there seems to be so many methods of adding coordinates to an article, and I haven't yet come across any guideline or comment recommending one over the others. In other words, do you know of any guideline on coordinates and, if there isn't one, which particular method do you recommend (assuming you have a preference)?

Thank you. LordVetinari 08:04, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Coord is Wiki standard, Mapit (an earlier Australian template) is now deprecated, so if I am editing something else I change it to Coord- about 1500 Mapits left and they do work OK so not necessary to change with any urgency. Regards (Crusoe8181 (talk) 08:15, 13 June 2011 (UTC)).
I thought it might have been something like that. Thank you. LordVetinari 08:54, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
Mapit unfortunately died the death of a thousand cuts in previous battles with standards-obsessed international editors (they're a species all unto their own, as those of us at WP:AUS have found in various fora), so it's *now* redundant to coord, although I feel that it was genuinely useful in its old (pre-2009) form. In general I do replace them where I see them now. Orderinchaos 15:01, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Infobox: Lok Sabha constituency[edit]

Hi - Following a proposal from your side, I had requested for the possible development of an Infobox for the Indian Lok Sabha constituencies along the lines of one's in Australia. Will that be possible? I am not a good chaser and let things off but I would love to see it come through. Cheers. - Chandan Guha (talk) 02:01, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Morongla Creek, New South Wales[edit]

Morongla Mechanics Institute.JPG

G'day. It seems the place does exist, so I have reverted to the stub which is the last reasonable version in the history before all the silliness was added. Cheers, JohnCD (talk) 13:45, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

I've redirected it to Cowra - the only thing I can find for sure is this mechanics' institute with this honour roll. lists it as "LOCU" (we only tend to write about "LOCB", "URBN" or "SUB"), but the clincher for me was that NSW DLG Suburb Search doesn't list it. The town is the furthest limit, from what I can tell, of the locality of Cowra (although it's closer to Wattamondara, which is a LOCB with a Suburb Search listing and a railway station). Orderinchaos 15:31, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Of course the place exists - I drove through it on Sunday! There is a Mechanics Institute and two churches there, more substantial a village than many things we write about. It is a fair drive from Cowra on the Boorowa road, further than would generally be considered a "suburb". Photos will be on Commons soon. The idea that only subjects recoginised by the government are suitable for articles is fallacious - it is more than suitable for a stand alone article. -- Mattinbgn (talk) 21:26, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
There's no question it *exists*, the question is where to write about it. A "Localities" subsection under Cowra, New South Wales would seem appropriate (hence why I redirected it there). It's not up to us, per WP:RS, to determine why they drew the Cowra locality boundary so wide, and why a locality was not gazetted at that location. (We have the same problem occasionally in rural WA, and I've seen it in Melbourne's suburbs with informal locality names.) Orderinchaos 21:48, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Last edit of the night syndrome! I thought the name was so close to Molonglo the name had to be fake and it didn't appear on Google Maps so I treated it like Longlowong, New South Wales (an anagram), Junt Creek, New South Wales etc etc (Google for Wiki mirrors), so I apologise for wasted time. Morongla Creek IS a suitable subject for an article (it had a Post office open from 1890-1972 so did have some substance, more than many LOCB localities), but not as eternal minimal stub or the repository of hoax edits and as long as its current status as part of the Cowra locality is mentioned. PS: the P*****y of Wy has had a reference link to its ad***ss added today, by an anon IP with, I swear, absolutely no connection to me! (perhaps a sympathiser). Cheers (Crusoe8181 (talk) 12:50, 15 June 2011 (UTC)) (born in a loc. no longer existing, attended primary school in a LOCU)
@OIC. You are using the gazettal of a locality as the rule in deciding when to allow a stand-alone article - I don't think that is an appropriate rule to use. Notwithstanding the seeming lack of official recognition, there are plenty of reliable sources that attest to the existence of the place, starting with the LGA website. I suggest re-splitting of the article. -- Mattinbgn (talk) 07:47, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
@Crusoe. Sanity at a WP:MICRON maintained article? I don't believe it! :) -- Mattinbgn (talk) 07:47, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Westgarth Primary School for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Westgarth Primary School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westgarth Primary School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TerriersFan (talk) 02:36, 20 June 2011 (UTC)


For the Burning Palm link - its fine - I forgot to link myself - cheers SatuSuro 10:32, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

for some obscure reason on my watchlist; bit of history around this area still neglected - Regards (Crusoe8181 (talk) 10:37, 20 June 2011 (UTC))
hahaha this is like delving into afd territory - we have just edit conflicted and i lost the new ref - will put it in now

looks much better btw SatuSuro 11:49, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

And trust no offence with removing merge template from Woodside Beach- it is an official locality, somewhat neglected because of missing cat and now has its infobox etc Cheers (Crusoe8181 (talk) 11:53, 20 June 2011 (UTC)).
hey we end up sorting a few things out and the article actually looks informative and attractive - great stuff - cheers as well SatuSuro 11:59, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Except Promentary!!! in your ref. But, that is what the ref says and if you can surf, perhaps you don't need to spell (Crusoe8181 (talk) 12:03, 20 June 2011 (UTC)).
I could tell a very long story about a few of the wikipedia eds who spend most their whole edit lives fixing spelling errors - but not online :) SatuSuro 12:08, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Mapit to coord[edit]

Gday. I never thought much about how many localities articles I had on my watchlist until I started seeing two or three appearing every day with your "Mapit to coord" mark left on them. Anyway, I just wanted to say well done on updating them all. I started doing it myself on some Adelaide articles but have less Wiki time now than I did previously, so I'm glad you've pursued it so thoroughly. LordVetinari 03:30, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead citations[edit]

Hi! I found

Usually it's not a good idea to outright remove dead links being used as citations. Instead please tag them with {{deadlink}}

Thank you, WhisperToMe (talk) 19:55, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Yarrawonga, Queensland[edit]

I did a search and found that it's a "parish" in Queensland. Bearian (talk) 23:06, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Yep, about a 1000km away, Cheers (Crusoe8181 (talk) 03:08, 30 June 2011 (UTC)).
I sent it to AfD. (Spotted it a couple of days ago while cleaning up Townsville and agreed with the prod when you put it on.) Orderinchaos 08:30, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Void Ray[edit]

Hello Crusoe8181. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Void Ray, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A1 is not appropriate for this article, the context is clear. This is one for a PROD rather than any obvious CSD. Thank you. (talk) 10:39, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Deleting categories[edit]

Hi, Curious to know why you deleted the category marketing strategy and social responsibility for Joey Reiman's page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MonaJalde (talkcontribs) 03:39, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Hello, because the categories don't exist (they were showing in red) Regards (Crusoe8181 (talk) 03:57, 14 July 2011 (UTC)).

Edits to Lutwyche page[edit]

Just wondering why you reverted my edits to the Lutwyche page. Did I do something against the rules. It's kinda the first time I've done any major additions, apart from the odd spelling/punctuation corrections, so maybe I've gone against the rules in some way, which wouldn't be surprising.

An explanation would be welcome. Thanks.

Diddy1960 (talk) 07:56, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

My rollback was discourteous as (accidentally) I didn't leave a reason, but intended to contact you about now. Your edit was almost a straight copy from the UQ website which is a copyright violation and is not permitted. The page is a useful External link and is on the article, but it is a parallel site which renders it unsatisfactory for use as a reference, regardless of how paraphrased, just as Wikipedia is not a reference. Regards (Crusoe8181 (talk) 08:36, 23 July 2011 (UTC)).

A barnstar for you![edit]

Tireless Contributor Barnstar Hires.gif The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
You seem to work a lot and I like to send you a barnstar. Bogdan Nagachop (talk) 10:42, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

What's up?[edit]

Are you angry or something? I think I have nothing done against you.

For your last comment on my editing, you seem to have missed the edits as documented under : Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (India)#Fixing dab links in Karnataka templates. Bogdan Nagachop (talk) 11:56, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

I avoid anger, despair is more the case, because I cannot keep up with your destruction of disambiguation pages of Indian articles, your total disregard of the concept of Primary topic, and the totally, utterly stupid and ridiculous idiotic creation of the the article Aheri, Papua New Guinea- if that is not so get your arse into gear, and provide a well-considered, referenced article on the PNG village of Aheri which you seem to know so much about (for none of us go around creating bare stubs if we don't intend to add more) for our readership or stop wasting the time of editors who have their readership as a priority- going away and having a quiet think about collaboration would not seem such a bad idea (Crusoe8181 (talk) 12:11, 23 July 2011 (UTC)).
Re the disambigs - is there a particular problem? I just viewed about 3 pages of Bogdan's moves to get a picture of what was going on and they seem to be simply moving ", India"s or malformed names to standard "city, state" forms. I've only quickly looked so may have missed something really obvious. Orderinchaos 16:26, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
(I do agree on the village in PNG - the editors who run round creating thousands of substubs of dubious provenance/sourcing that they never plan to maintain and noone else ever will, annoy me like crazy.) Orderinchaos 16:27, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

I think we should more worry about subtle changes as here: Then to fight each other. Currently the article references two districts. Please see that you moved Aheri [1] and by doing so created future problems with disambiguation. That's the only reason why I created the PNG entry, it is there as a reference. I also created Category:Populated places in Sandaun Province and found only 7 other articles. Seems PNG could need help.

You sometimes think something is unique

  • (cur | prev) 01:57, 7 May 2010 Crusoe8181 (talk | contribs) m (2,838 bytes) (moved Banga, Punjab (India) to Banga, Punjab: sufficient dab) (undo)

when it is not: Banga, Punjab Please tone down a little bit. I didn't create much stubs, and if you object you can so politely. The WP:SIA are welcomed by by some and will help with clean up.

There are really bigger worries than a well referenced PNG stub

I probably also do something that need later correction. But please don't run around as if you know everything and the others are not worth of contributing. Bogdan Nagachop (talk) 16:51, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

You are aware that Geonames, as a publicly sourced database, is actually not a good reference source? I personally find it disappointing when I find articles that have been created from such a source without even an attempt to check whether other sources back it up. I have a reasonable map of PNG, and it is unmarked; Google also doesn't have it in their reasonably comprehensive database. Orderinchaos 21:47, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
How do you know that if you find an article, there was not "even an attempt to check whether other sources back it up"? But yes, I couldn't find another source. If you think this needs to be deleted, I would not object. But maybe in the dab page, when it is removed one can note that, so others do not commit the same error again. Bogdan Nagachop (talk) 12:10, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

@Crusoe - you write resurrect dab - but there never was one. It seems you are stalking me. Bogdan Nagachop (talk) 12:03, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

There are some real issues with articles, e.g. in January on the page for the city of Faridabad someone removed the city infobox and replaced it with the box from Faridabad District. [4] - No one has reverted this so far. Bogdan Nagachop (talk) 12:58, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

I collect same named places at Category:Set indices on populated places in India, but you removed "Un, India" [5]. You also write "(resurrect dab page)" - but there never was a dab at that title. Please do not remove pages from the SIA category. Bogdan Nagachop (talk) 13:02, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Crusoe818. I must say I find the discussion above confusing, and I am not sure what you are trying to accomplish. It seems that in many cases you are taking a title like "Someplace" that is a redirect to "Someplace, India," and changing it into a disambiguation page that (in many cases) contains exactly the same links as "Someplace". It is not at all apparent how this duplication assists our readers.
However, if you are sure that these titles should be disambiguation pages, then please also assume the responsibility of fixing the incoming links to these titles. In general, these links are contained in templates, so that it would only take you a few minutes for each disambiguation page to check for templates that link to that title and fix the links to point to the correct article. Thanks. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 01:20, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Happy Humphrey's weight[edit]

Happy Humphrey did not weighed 1,000 lbs you gay fucker. His heaviest weight was 926 lbs. He usually averaged about 340-350 kg bodyweight so where the fuck did 1,000 lbs came from fag?

Thanks for your courteous query, User:JeffStambull, when so many Wikipedia editors are downright rude. I simply reverted one of your edits based on hearsay and advised you of the reason (I trust I was not too abrupt) Regards (Crusoe8181 (talk) 09:23, 25 July 2011 (UTC)).
For weighed I think User:JeffStambull meant weigh, for came I would suggest come was meant, otherwise I am sure his family and friends would be proud of his liacyr, litrussy, litercyy, damn, eating without causing damage to fingers perhaps (Crusoe8181 (talk) 10:46, 25 July 2011 (UTC)).

Yeah I made a mistake by saying "weighed." Your saying my family and friends would be proud of my literacy? WTF you talking about? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JeffStambull (talkcontribs) 06:15, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

you gay fucker was how you addressed me, no offence taken because I imagine Mommy was teaching you how to spell BIG WORDS, WHICH YOU ARE NOT OLD ENUFF TO UNNERSTANN JIST YET. Eat healthy food, think healthy thoughts and you will grow up happy and keep out of prison. Regards Crusoe8181 (talk) 11:36, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

ANI notice[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.—SpacemanSpiff 19:32, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

My moves[edit]

Sorry for offered no reason for changing names of various places, they are according to IAST (Alphabet of Sanskrit Transliteration) (Rameez pp (talk) 09:44, 29 July 2011 (UTC))

Can we consider census names as official Transliterations? (Rameez pp (talk) 12:20, 29 July 2011 (UTC))
But, they are according to the authentic ISO 15919

(Rameez pp (talk) 15:52, 4 August 2011 (UTC))

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Lists of United States people by school affiliation[edit]

Category:Lists of United States people by school affiliation, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 22:34, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Mac for Mc in sorting[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Crusoe8181. You have new messages at Tewapack's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

India pages[edit]

I'm going to have very minimal on-wiki time for a few more days, but should we figure out a list of "move backs"? Many of the moves he did automatically transferred links to those SIA pages or DABs. Also, the template with all ambiguous names -- is there any value in it, could we just move it to project space as a list of places? Since he's a banned user, we could delete most of these as {{db-g5}} anyway, but the deletion will put a lot of incoming links in limbo where he moved the pages (and of course a lot of articles are now orphans because their titles have been retargeted). cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 11:45, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

I think I am on top of this- if the ones I Prod go (which are harmless as far as dabs etc. go), the ones that are left are, in many cases, converted from dab pages which I will then sort out. I don't think reverts work in this case, because of renaming after move (pity) - then the template goes, but is useful for the moment. Regards (Crusoe8181 (talk) 11:55, 10 August 2011 (UTC)).
I've moved the template to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (India)/List of ambiguous names primarily because it's becoming increasingly difficult to see what the incoming links are with all these moves to SIAs and DABs. e.g. Adoor is almost exclusively linked for its original name, but it's now pointing to an SIA. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 11:59, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
My bedtime now, but a 2-step process which I am on top of for now. editor below may not be helping, but I will check. (Crusoe8181 (talk) 12:02, 10 August 2011 (UTC)).
It's going to take a while for the "links" from the template to not show up on the "what links here" page. Once that happens, we'll know which page can just be retargeted/moved back and which page can be deleted. I'll see if I can do something on that front later. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 12:08, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Recent use of WP:PROD[edit]

Can I just point you towards speedy deletion criterion G5, for tagging "pages created by banned or blocked users in violation of their ban or block, and which have no substantial edits by others"? It's quicker than using the proposed deletion process. Thanks, (talk) 11:47, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, rough chance there may be disagreement; I work on the general principle that the edit is more worthy than the editee. Regards (Crusoe8181 (talk) 11:58, 10 August 2011 (UTC)).

Madhapuram et al[edit]

I see a number of PRODs on pages like Madhapuram, India which you say are "quasi-silly". I don't see how that is the case, it seems no more or less silly than any other DAB. I'm inclined to decline the PRODs unless you have some other reason not to. Maury Markowitz (talk) 20:05, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Ahh, is this the same issue as the comment section above? Likely, but I still see use in these pages. Maury Markowitz (talk) 20:09, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

I changed your "words" let me know if an issue[edit]

I was in a conversation a few weeks ago where we observed what happens when an editor receives templates for a large number of articles, each with the same wording. We agreed that it could be discouraging, and thought it would be better to include a single template, and add the others as a list. While this is neither a policy nor a guideline, we thought it was a good idea. I've taken the liberty of making the change at User talk:Bogdan Nagachop, and someday, may propose that it either become a guideline and/or be implemented in the tools. What do you think?--SPhilbrickT 10:35, 11 August 2011 (UTC)


I kept meaning to standardise the WA LGA headings, but you beat me to it :P It was my fault originally, as I'd made a template (traditional rather than Wikipedia meaning) for those articles which as it turned out contained that MOS issue and a factual error which I've periodically been stamping out.

  • Incorrect (Shire of Kojonup): "In 1871, the Kojonup Road Board was gazetted. On 1 July 1961, it became the Shire of Kojonup following changes to the Local Government Act."
  • Correct (Shire of West Arthur): "On 10 January 1896, the West Arthur Road District was gazetted. [...] On 1 July 1961, it became the Shire of West Arthur under the Local Government Act 1960."

Prior to 1960, there was no Local Government Act, and the road board was a council which governed a road district, as was suggested by the name of the Road Districts Act 1919 which it replaced. If you see any of these (I'll fix Kojonup now) feel free to fix them. Orderinchaos 14:17, 2 September 2011 (UTC)


Thanks for the tip, I'll have a thorough read of the research papers and other references and fix it up. --Canley (talk) 09:54, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

It was the Monash Uni article I got the population info from, not a bad newspaper article. However, I have added a line about T. australis haplotypes being found in dolphins near Tasmania and South Australia. --Canley (talk) 10:07, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
I misread it initially; somewhere in the paper it will probably say there is little overlap between species otherwise they would have interbred; T. australis occupies the cooler waters beyond the range of the main species, as the Indian species occupies the warmer waters. Regards (Crusoe8181 (talk) 10:16, 16 September 2011 (UTC)).

Removal of my article in hampi page[edit]

Hi, I had written an article describing the history and temples of hampi. I have come to know that my article has been removed stating vandalism. I would like to know what content of my article made you believe it to be a vandal. For your ref:

Thanks & Regards Brkrao — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brkrao (talkcontribs) 13:12, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Removal of my article in hampi page[edit]

Hi, I had written an article describing the history and temples of hampi. I have come to know that my article has been removed stating vandalism. I would like to know what content of my article made you believe it to be a vandal. For your ref:

Thanks & Regards Brkrao — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brkrao (talkcontribs) 13:14, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

please sign your talk page edits; my concern was the edits you have made copying directly from the Karnataka Gazette, which we do not do on Wikipedia as this is an abundantly clear copyright violation. Nonsense like the copy from that publication (HAMPI: (Bellary dt; Hospet tq)') is a quick giveaway. Regards (Crusoe8181 (talk) 08:42, 18 September 2011 (UTC)).

Removal of my article hampi[edit]

hi, I agree that, i have taken article from Karnataka State Gazetteer 1983. I felt though it comes under copy write, it may come under public domain. You could have inform me at your first instance itself, instead of using ugly language like vandalism, nonsense.Mind your language. Don't ever try to discourage people enthusiastic who make humble effort to contribute for writing such articles at public interest. Your such words not only kill the esprit of writing instinct in me but also others who have it them. Regards. BrkraoBrkrao (talk) 09:52, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Morning, Crusoe.[edit]

A small cup of coffee.JPG A new day awaits. PhnomPencil (talk) 20:57, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Malankara Metropolitans[edit]

Sorry to note your recent changes of titles of Malankara Metropolitans were done without any consultation or warning. You seem to assume that your corrections also fit into the category Wikipedia:Naming conventions (clergy) {Syriac bishops} and {Eastern Orthodox metropolitans, archbishops and bishops} Names of bishops given in these categaries are that of Roman Catholic Churches in Kerala, and not that of Malankara Metropolitans. It seems that you have not read the introductory part of naming conventions that tells you about ancient historical church clergy at the higher level. Also please remember that the title “Mar” must be used with their names and should not be left out. “Mar Thoma” means “Saint Thomas”

These new titles given to our bishops by your edits are ridiculus and insulting. Hope you have not done this delibrately.Neduvelilmathew (talk) 08:09, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Titles and honorifics don't belong in titles of Wikipedia articles. I was unhappy with the changes I had made after seeing that Pope was acceptable but not Mar and was about to take it to the India Wikipedia talk page to discuss. There was no intention of insult. Regards (Crusoe8181 (talk) 10:04, 24 September 2011 (UTC)).

Sharon Owens[edit]

Hi. I've declined your speedy request as to my mind there is sufficient context. At least one of her books seems to have been published by Penguin, so there could be significance (more than if lulu was involved, at least...). It could do with some digging or tagging for improvement. Peridon (talk) 14:56, 26 September 2011 (UTC)


Sorry about that. I'm a new user of Wikipedia and do not know much about editing and things like that. I have now changed the population of Point Cook. Sorry for any inconvenience cause. If you have any other problems, please write it on my user wall.

Thank you David. Sis****** — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dssis1 (talkcontribs) 06:24, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Regimental Marches of the British Army[edit]

I have reverted your edit because it is better to have the information, rather than a deletion due to poor format. Not all the section is in capitals, only the unit's names. The text was copied from a recording list in this format. It was my intention to change the over-capitalisation over time, but felt that producing the information is better than correcting format.

DonJay (talk) 13:43, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for correction[edit]

Thanks for fixing the spelling on the racehorse articles. Especially for decribing the repeated mistake as a "typo"- very tactful. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 20:02, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Your edit summary at St. George Girls[edit]

"Alphabettliccle awdwer for a a srat" [[6]] <-- Wot? ˜danjel [ talk | contribs ] 08:22, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Schmidt between Brennann and Goodall??- no ref to school, and not a newbie editor. Seems my keyboard had had enough. Regards Crusoe8181 (talk) 08:31, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Ah. "Alphabetical order for a start". :) Reminds me of my attempt to use Dragon Naturally Speaking trained by someone else... ˜danjel [ talk | contribs ] 08:59, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrolling[edit]

Hi. I'm just letting you know that I have deleted Jaracadas per ‎ G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion: and A7 (no assertion of importance, and not A1 (No context) as you had tagged it. The article contained a complete description of a company. Please read WP:NPP, and don't hesitate to ask me if you have any questions. Also if you had done the required checks, you would have seen that the article has been deleted twice perviously. -Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:12, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

G'day, I heard that ya aussie..[edit]

A small cup of coffee.JPG Thank you for helping me get started in Wikipedia. (I'm Australian too!)

Thanks. David

Dssis1 (talk) 07:41, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Allgomera - Nambucca Shire[edit]

I suggest you do some research (try starting with google) before you start editing things that you obviously know nothing about. I have restored my original edits, as I live in the Shire and know the localities (live in one of them, the other is a neighbouring one). Try also the Australia Post postcode finder or even the postcode listing in the back of your telephone book before you start wasting the time of others. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qcountry63 (talkcontribs) 21:54, 11 October 2011 (UTC)