User talk:Diabedia

May 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to National Anthem of the Altai Republic has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: National Anthem of the Altai Republic was changed by Diabedia (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.867751 on 2016-05-15T20:12:35+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:12, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Men – Tyva Men. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Men – Tyva Men was changed by Diabedia (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.880258 on 2016-05-15T20:30:01+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:30, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Tuvan language

Do you speak tuvan?--Antemister (talk) 08:04, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Diabedia, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Diabedia! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Your article Anthem of the Republic of Dagestan

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Anthem of the Republic of Dagestan to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 06:36, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Anthem of East Turkestan

I have removed the lyrics to the anthem, as they are copyright, and we cannot host them here. — Diannaa (talk) 20:09, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Aurora (airline) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Jetstreamer ^Talk 19:49, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of National Anthem of East Turkestan

The article National Anthem of East Turkestan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The source for this article is the website for the "East Turkestan Government-in-Exile" a group that is not recognized to represent any particular group of people. There is an East Turkestan separatist movement, but as no actual nation has yet been formed or recognized, no "national anthem" can yet exist for the group.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:44, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, did not appear constructive and has been or will be undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.
Please see WP:UKROM (BGN/PCGN transliteration is the standard used for straight forward transliteration. This also stands for the transliteration of Russian per WP:RUROM. Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:28, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Anthem of East Turkestan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anthem of East Turkestan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthem of East Turkestan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 05:41, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Dodo-Gol

Please add reliable sources and category.Xx236 (talk) 07:24, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

You have created the substub, please continue.Xx236 (talk) 06:19, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Romanization of Russian

Hi there! Thanks for taking time to add Russian romanization to various articles, but please note that the romanization system used in the English Wikipedia is the one outlined in WP:RUS (BGN/PCGN-based), not GOST/ISO. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); June 20, 2016; 15:19 (UTC)

Second reminder about transliteration of Russian words

Please see the previous notice about Romanization. - üser:Altenmann >t 06:01, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Also, please DO NOT put Romanizations inside curly brackets {{ }}. Please pay attention how other people changed your edits. - üser:Altenmann >t 06:03, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Actually, it's the third reminder. I clarified Wikipedia's transliteration standards earlier this month above. It appears that Diabedia is not WP:LISTENing. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 06:10, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

BGN/PCGN

· I'm not a fan of the BGN/RCGN system either but we have to use it here — Preceding unsigned comment added by Шибуево Жаңшулокикомав (talk • contribs) 16:21, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

· it doesn't use letters w/ diacritics like in the english alphabet so many letters used have the same useage. i see why it is suitable for the enwiki...Diabedia (talk) 16:27, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

· I do like your transliterations. Your Russian and Ukrainian looks more Slavic, similar to the ones used in Serbo-Croatian, Czech-Slovak, Slovene, etc. They all use haceks and sometimes acutes. I've also noticed you using the Latynka or Euro-Ukrainian alphabets for Ukrainian instead of BGN/RCGN. I like it a lot. Шибуево Жаңшулокикомав (talk) 16:31, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

· im a big supporter of those systems. it is similar to Belarusian Łacinka and it seems like enwiki prefers this over BGN/RCGN. i've seen this in many articles. the letters with carons and acutes (for palatalization) are used. the carons and acutes (sometimes) and j (same usage in IPA) is common in Balto-Slavic languages and it is more apt for the languages. sometimes i use j for ь (in East Slavic languages) if it's the preceding letter of another consonant besides c,s,z since it indicates palatalization (for better reading), though depending on iotation. so ’ is used for ъ instead which leads to less ambiguity. on the other hand, cedillas & dotless i's are used in many Turkic language due to sharing of similar phonemes... Diabedia (talk) 16:48, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

· and BGN/RCGN uses y for both ы & й and they don't use j (they use dzh). I agree, there are better transliteration schemes that have less ambiguity, unlike BGN/RCGN. Шибуево Жаңшулокикомав (talk) 16:55, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

· in Russian, Щ is /ɕː/ but is romanized to shch /ʃt͡ʃ/ in BGN/RCGN (it's okay in Ukrainian) Diabedia (talk) 17:01, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

· Very true, because many letters are converted and have the same value. The BGN/RCGN is commonly used for Russian and Ukrainian designed for English speakers.Шибуево Жаңшулокикомав (talk) 17:05, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) No, it's only your personal opinion that it is more intuitive for English readers. Neither of you are native speakers of English, so you're both working off your own presumptions. I don't mean this impolitely, but it is self-evident that your knowledge of English isn't up to par, therefore it is fitting that first language speakers have a better take on what is and isn't intuitive. For example, the use of 'j' connotes 'j' and 'y' for a reader. You're conflating the extensive use of the Latin alphabet in multiple European alphabets with the English alphabet and how English readers read. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 01:27, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

·this lady saying we're retarded in a way :}} Diabedia (talk) 02:05, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

· LOL Шибуево Жаңшулокикомав (talk) 02:05, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

If, by "retarded" ( [sic]), you mean being fluent in a LOTE (language other than English), proficient in at least one+ languages, and capable of handling linguistic elements of articles in English language Wikipedia, lead on to the "retarded" world. Considering that the majority of Anglophones are monolingual, please tell me where I can apply for citizenship! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 03:17, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) I do agree with Iryna on both her comments, but I don't know whether if english is their native language or not, or they were just young children casually chatting with each other and didn't bother with grammar at the time. Diabedia may be a troll now albeit being potentially knowledgeable in certain linguistics topics, but according to this, (s)he is quite young (perhaps 9 or 10 back then) of a user evidently lacking maturity, autistic or has behavioural disorders. I've also noticed that, after looking at their later contribs by their later socks/IPs, their English and competence have improved quite significantly since 2016. Waatese (talk) 09:24, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Northwest Caucasian transliterations

I'm trying to come up with a transliteration scheme on how to transliterate languages such as Adyghe, Abkhaz, or Ubykh with a very complicated phonology system. Any ideas? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Шибуево Жаңшулокикомав (talk • contribs) 02:09, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

you can see here transliteration i made for Adyghe @[Anthem of the Republic of Adygea]. i try, LOL. but still im coming up with a better version (dont use the shitty current transliteration. it does not follow the alphabet rules.). I also like ISO transliteration, though. People who made transliteration schemes for Adyghe must've been real proud of themselves... Diabedia (talk) 02:23, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

I've made new transliteration for Adyghe (am still coming up a better one) ... [here] Diabedia (talk) 23:31, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

August 2016

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Men – Tyva Men. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. This is your one and only warning that you will receive for presenting such type of commentary towards others. ("Nobody respects your shitty transliteration, either. just STFU you annoying wanker"). Please don't do that again. Bests - LouisAragon (talk) 04:15, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Please stop edit warring and swearing at others. Wikipedia does not tolerate such actions. If you want people to respect you, you should show respect to others. Read the rules. Listen to other people. Also, if you want to start an argument (not recommended), your comments should at least be at a constructive level. Calling people homo erectus or wankers is just going to ruin yourself here and you will be facing disciplinary actions. That is some repugnant behavior you have. Your transliterations... eh. If you want to be a “good” transliterator, I suggest you study linguistics. It’s self-evident that you’re not a linguist, but just some random guy behind a screen imposing your made-up transliterations on certain articles. By the way, anybody can do that. According to some of your edit summaries earlier this year, it seems like you didn’t even complete grade school. I’m not trying to be rude in any way, but your actions have been too frivolous. —Talking Ben (talk) 18:29, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

I’m keeping an eye on you... —There, I have entered a username (talk) 17:52, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

So am I... —Talking Ben (talk) 13:39, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Ña-hah.

September 2016

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Murph9000 (talk) 14:54, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Anatoliy Andreyev

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anatoliy Andreyev requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. WikiPancake ^{✉ 📖} 13:21, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Never mind this post, see below. WikiPancake ^{✉ 📖} 13:29, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Anatoliy Andreyev for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anatoliy Andreyev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anatoliy Andreyev until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WikiPancake ^{✉ 📖} 13:26, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Diabedia. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Diabedia, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

🔯 Sir Joseph ^🍸(talk) 15:28, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Im still here LOL — Preceding unsigned comment added by Donald Trump supporter (talk • contribs) 19:42, 24 January 2017 (UTC)