User talk:DonitzLiebt

Welcome!

Hello, DonitzLiebt! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Ugog Nizdast (talk) 11:13, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Kolkata class

Please see this link Cheers, ƬheStrike Σagle ^sorties 12:59, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Economy of India GDP rank

Hello, I saw your reversion of my edit at Economy of India. The reason I noticed this figure is because it said that the rank for India for GDP per capita was 141th, which is not a properly formatted ordinal. If it’s 141, it should be 141st. I checked the figure's link to List of countries by GDP (nominal) per capita under International Monetary Fund, where it says that number 138 is India, 1,501. The source supporting that is at IMF World Economic Outlook Database, October 2013 where it says "Gross domestic product per capita, current prices" for India is 1,500.757, which is rounded to 1,501 in the table.

I see the link in the Economy of India article goes to a different page also labeled IMF World Economic Outlook Database, October 2013 for India where it gives different figures.

I don't know which set of numbers is correct, and neither source gives a ranking, but the figure's link does support 138th and 1,501. Are you able to clarify that it is indeed 141st or something else? Thanks, SchreiberBike talk 04:38, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BilCat. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Boeing 787 Dreamliner that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - BilCat (talk) 19:03, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Civility Warning

please stop making personal attacks in your edit summaries, it is not considered good form and against policy, you have been warned once already and since continued to be uncivil, if you continue to make personal remarks and continue attacking other edits you are likely to be blocked from editing wikipedia, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 20:41, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at Boeing 787 Dreamliner shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. - BilCat (talk) 01:01, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Economy of India. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ƬheStrike Σagle ^sorties 14:25, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Economy of India. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. ƬheStrike Σagle ^sorties 13:12, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Final Warning

What the other guy was doing was technically right as he thought he was reverting a sock....you are free to re-introduce updated figures...nobody's stopping you! But using too much offensive language is not allowed. Consider this your final warning. ƬheStrike Σagle ^sorties 13:16, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I personally greatly appreciate your efforts to improve the article but civility is mandatory, no matter how good a user you are. ƬheStrike Σagle ^sorties 13:19, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Jared Fogle, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 20:11, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The name of the article is Automotive industry in India, not "Automobile industry in India"!

Automotive industry refers to the manufacture of motor vehicles of all kinds, regardless of if they have two wheels, three wheels or four wheels, so stop treating the article as if it's only about cars/automobiles. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 18:27, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Otto Warmbier, you may be blocked from editing. Brianga (talk) 15:33, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why have you added irrelevant topics Ryan Lochte and Lochtegate to the article? What's your reason? --George Ho (talk) 15:57, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@George Ho: The user in question mentions "white privilege" in the Loche article, but denies it in the Warmbier article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yoshiman6464 (talk • contribs) 16:02, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lochtegate. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. » Shadowowl | talk 16:02, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Lochtegate.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. » Shadowowl | talk 16:03, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Lochtegate. » Shadowowl | talk 16:06, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are reported at WP:ANI#User:DonitzLiebt. Respond there. George Ho (talk) 16:10, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.