Jump to content

User talk:Fluffernutter/Archive 22

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 15←Archive 20Archive 21Archive 22Archive 23Archive 24Archive 25

block length

Re [1] -- did you really mean infinite? (Don't know that it's important in context, just curious). NE Ent 02:52, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, we commonly stress to blocked people that "indefinite is not infinite". In this case Snakebyte was interpreting their block as "you are blocked forever from everything", so I wanted to make it clear that being under an indefinite block doesn't mean they're under a forever-and-ever-block. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 14:13, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Stephanie Adams

Can you review this full protection, set by you on 15:32, 4 August 2012‎.

All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 22:44, 8 October 2014 (UTC).

@Rich Farmbrough: I reviewed it a few months ago at someone else's request, but I'm about done for the evening and don't have the energy to find it in my archives. I'll dig around tomorrow, find that, and get back to you. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 00:50, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, no hurry. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 00:55, 9 October 2014 (UTC).
Sorry Rich Farmbrough, that took me a little longer than expected. It looks like I last evaluated the protection in July of this year, on the article's talk page. At the time, there was a renewed flurry of editing and I wasn't enthusiastic about unprotecting in the midst of that. It looks like that spate of attention has passed, however, and given that it's been a while since we saw the LTA that caused the article to require full protection, I've dropped the protection to semi now. I've half a mind to pop PC1 protection on top of that, but we might as well see how it does under just semi before locking it down any tighter. If you or any of my talk page stalkers want to help out, I would appreciate people keeping an eye on the article for while to make sure it remains under control. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 16:10, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
I saw this on my watchlist (the article is till on there from my prior involvement with article a few years ago). I'm not at al keen on long-term full protection, but in this case removing it makes me nervous given that there has been a determined and persistent campaign against the subject over several years (and if memory serves, she hasn't necessarily helped to de-escalate things). I suppose it's time to give it another try, but I think we should have a hair trigger for reverting back to full prot (or PC1, if it'll stick, and if it's very closely monitored). HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:34, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Yeah I agree, HJ Mitchell. This is not an article where we can, as my mother would put it, "dilly-dally" about restoring protection if things start to go off the rails again. Since PC allows edits to be made and remain in page histories, I'd rather opt for full instead of PC if we need to re-up the protection; better to keep the edits from being made in the first place than have to do yet more BLP cleanup after the fact. You or any other admin can feel free to modify or increase the protection I set as needed, especially if the article starts heating up again. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:34, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Certainly protection should be restored if it is needed. We are more ready, though, to do this than we were. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 20:23, 12 October 2014 (UTC).

Tech News: 2014-42

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent software changes

Problems

  • 10% of Tool Labs was down on October 7. [4]
  • Tool Labs was also broken on October 11. [5]

Software changes this week

  • The new version of MediaWiki (1.25wmf3) has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since 9 October. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from 14 October, and on all Wikipedias from 16 October (calendar).
  • 5% of logged-out readers are getting pages from servers that run the HHVM tool. HHVM should make pages load faster. You can also test it as a Beta Feature. [6]

Meetings

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

08:54, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

GOCE October 2014 newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors October 2014 newsletter is now ready for review. Highlights:

– Your project coordinators: Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978 and Miniapolis.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

20:05:01, 16 October 2014 review of submission by KevinPace1


First, thanks for taking the time to review my article. As you can tell, it was my first. What specifically can I do to improve the article? I compared it to numerous other jazz vibe articles and it is nearly identical to theirs. Again, thanks for your time and all of your help! KevinKevinPace1 (talk) 20:05, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

KevinPace1 (talk) 20:05, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi KevinPace1. The main problem with your draft is that it lacks citations for the vast majority of its information. Wikipedia requires information to be verifiable, which means we need to be able to trace back a statement in an article to the proof of that statement. This goes double when we're writing about living people, on whose behalf we try to make all statements about them pretty bulletproof. If we let authors write anything they wanted about living people without requiring them to verify that information, it could easily lead to reputation and libel issued. So in your article, you have a few hundred words about Jon Metzger...but there's only one source linked to any of those words, and that source only addresses some of what you wrote about. A baseline rule of thumb when you're writing about a living person is to make sure you have at least one cited source per paragraph, telling us where you got the information in that paragraph. Remember that encyclopedia articles are intended to be surveys of other, more primary material, not original research that can't be traced back to primary material, so that readers can follow the trail for their research. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 20:29, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 October 2014

Tech News: 2014-43

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. You can read translations.

Recent changes

  • You can test a new system to see math using MathML. Go to your display options and choose "⧼mw math mathml⧽".
  • You can add badges in Wikidata for quality articles and featured lists. [10] [11]

File information cleanup

Problems

  • Developers fixed a security problem. If you use Internet Explorer 6, you won't be able to log in any more. You should use a newer browser. [13]

Changes this week

  • The new version of MediaWiki (1.25wmf4) has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since October 16. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from October 21, and on all Wikipedias from October 23 (calendar).
  • 10% of logged-out readers are getting pages from servers that run the HHVM tool. HHVM should make pages load faster. You can also test it as a Beta Feature. [14]
  • If you add the same parameter twice in a template, it now puts the page in a tracking category. [15] [16]

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

13:48, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Stephanie Adams article

I believe you were the admin who either fully protected or both fully then semi protected the SA article. I and my colleagues researched the page and found two aggressive and negative editors in the past, fasttimes68 (banned then later banned again as a sock puppet) and hoary (still editing and following) interestingly so are friends. My suggestion is that you ban hoary from editing this page and also place the full protection back up again for at least another year. From what I've seen of hoary and his both frivolous as well as libelous edits the past several years, even exhibited in the discussions, and given the fact that SA is a continued public persona who will more than likely have more news coming out, it is better for Wikipedia to be safe than sorry. Unless no one minds more cleaning up to do. Tfortrouble (talk) 12:12, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

How strange, Tfortrouble, that such a new account should immediately and exclusively focus on that article, without even dabbling at anything newbie-related first. Given that you've never edited with this account prior to yesterday, which "colleagues" are you speaking of? How do you know Hoary, who they're friends with, and what type of edits they make? A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 15:01, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Topic Ban

Sorry to hear about your health issues (I'm a cancer survivor myself, so I know a bit about chronic health issues ). Anyrate, no I'm not going to ask for my Topic ban to be lifted, so don't worry about that. I want to ask if the ban on MOS:ID is "broadly construed " , in other words, I know I'm banned from that page, however, am I banned from any and all discussions about MOS:ID anywhere ? Thanks KoshVorlon Rassekali ternii i mlechnye puti 17:31, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi KoshVorlon. Your topic ban applies to "all pages and discussions related to transgender issues, broadly construed". So the intention there is to keep you away from transgender issues, specifically, anywhere on Wikipedia, including the MOS; if there are sections of the MOS you wish to edit that are completely unrelated to transgender issues, I would see no problem with you editing normally on those (abiding, of course, by BRD, your 0RR restriction, etc). MOS:ID, in particular, though, seems potentially problematic. If the part of it you intend to edit seriously has absolutely nothing to do with transgender issues - if you're interested in editing the "Arab" section, for example - I wouldn't see that as a problem, but the "broadly construed" language of your topic ban means that you're expected to keep well away from any MOS edits that could have anything to do with transgender issues - so pronouns, people's names, how to refer to groups by sexuality, and things like that would all be right out. The usual advice for broad topic bans applies here: if you're not sure a topic is 100% not covered by the ban, either ask first, or just don't make the edits you were thinking about.

Tl;dr version: You're not banned from editing everything in the MOS, but MOS:ID in particular seems like a questionable place to focus your attention if you want to be positive you don't step on the topic ban, and I would advise you to be scrupulous about staying away from anything even slightly related to transgender issues within that section. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 14:56, 20 October 2014 (UTC)


Understood Fluffernuteer. I wasn't going to actually edit that page, however,the subject came up (not on a transgender page) and I wanted to be clear on my restrictions before I responded. I hear you though, if that subject comes up , don't respond to it would be my best choice. Thank you ! KoshVorlon Rassekali ternii i mlechnye puti 16:50, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 October 2014

Tech News: 2014-44

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Problems

  • There was an issue with files from Commons on October 21. You could only see those with names between 140 and 159 characters by visiting Commons itself. [17]
  • There was a problem with cut and paste in VisualEditor in Firefox. It was fixed quickly. [18]
  • There was a problem with editing math in VisualEditor. It was fixed quickly. [19]

Software changes this week

  • The new version of MediaWiki will now come to Wikipedia sites every Wednesday, instead of every Thursday. [20]
  • The new version of MediaWiki (1.25wmf5) has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since October 23. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from October 28, and on all Wikipedias from October 29 (calendar).
  • VisualEditor now uses autovalues for templates if they are in TemplateData. [21] [22] [23]
  • VisualEditor's menu items now show their shortcuts beside them. [24]
  • VisualEditor now opens faster when you click "edit". [25]
  • The rules for plurals in translations changed in some languages. Interface translations are currently not being updated from translatewiki.net; this process will start again on November 6. [26]

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

05:20, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 October 2014

Tech News: 2014-45

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent software changes

Problems

  • There was a bug in VisualEditor with Internet Explorer. It hid tools like the link editor when you opened them. The bug was fixed on Monday. [30]
  • Issues with the new search tool caused geo data code to show up on pages on Monday and Friday. The mobile "nearby" tool was also broken. The problem is now fixed. [31] [32] [33]
  • HHVM caused server issues on Thursday. They are now fixed.

Software changes this week

  • The new version of MediaWiki (1.25wmf5) has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since October 29. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from November 4, and on all Wikipedias from November 5 (calendar).
  • Some wikis have icons at the top of a page to show if it is protected or featured. Icons show up using CSS. You can now use the <indicator> tag in these templates instead to add the icons. [34] [35]
  • VisualEditor now tells you if you're editing a re-used reference. This helps you avoid changing it if you just want to add a new one. [36]
  • The icons in VisualEditor's template editor tool for adding more fields are back, along with other fixes. [37] [38] [39] [40] [41]
  • After November 6, all wikis will have the tool to edit TemplateData. [42] [43] [44]

Future changes

  • The new search tool will come to the last wikis in the coming weeks. This includes Wikipedia in French, Chinese, German and English. [45]

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

17:28, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Any objections?

Hi Fluffernutter. Thine Antique Pen has wandered over to my talk page and asked if the "no requesting permissions" restriction could be removed. It was a voluntary agreement upon unblocking, not a community imposed restriction - and since you were involved in discussions around then, I thought I'd double check your opinion. It was updated in 2012 so he had to go through me if he wanted to make requests, and I don't think he's asked more than a handful of times. I've no problems at all with the restriction being removed, and absent objections will do so tomorrow. WormTT(talk) 08:22, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

@Worm That Turned: I haven't seen any trouble to do with TAP in a very long time, and I get the sense he's matured, so I'm fine with removing the restriction as long as someone does the usual amount of "making sure nothing goes immediately off the rails after that". Thanks for checking in with me! A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 14:11, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
No problems, glad to hear it! I'll do my best to keep an eye on him... if I have a chance! WormTT(talk) 14:13, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

User page vandalism

First, thanks for taking care of that. But I didn't actually even catch the change in my watchlist before you deleted it, so I don't know what it contained. Would it be possible for you to drop me an email letting me know what exactly was in that revision? If someone's posting things on my user page bad enough to be revdeleted I feel like I should probably know about it. -- TaraInDC (talk) 17:22, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

No problem, TaraInDC, email sent. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 17:27, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 November 2014

Tech News: 2014-46

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent software changes

  • You may see a new tool on the mobile site of the English Wikipedia. It asks simple questions to make the article better. In the future, your answers will go to Wikidata. [46] [47]
  • The MediaWiki API now shows information in a nice format. You can translate it in translatewiki.net. [48]

File information cleanup

Problems

  • Wikimedia Labs was broken for a few hours on Thursday. It was due to a hardware problem. [49]

Software changes this week

  • The new version of MediaWiki (1.25wmf7) has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since November 5. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from November 11, and on all Wikipedias from November 12 (calendar).
  • You can now use more editing tools for tables in VisualEditor. You can add rows and columns, merge cells, and edit table captions. [50] [51]
  • The style and insert menus in the toolbar of VisualEditor now show fewer tools. This helps you see the most common tasks. You can see all items by clicking "More". [52]
  • The way windows inside VisualEditor work has changed. VisualEditor should be faster and have fewer bugs. [53]

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

15:00, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Precious

gnome
Thank you, tireless tired wikignome, for quality articles such as Sharon Kinne, for contributing under extreme conditions, for fighting vandalism and copyvio, for educating editors to contribute constructively, and for looking for the good around here part of which you are yourself, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:02, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

A year ago, you were the 659th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:47, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 November 2014

Tech News: 2014-47

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Software changes this week

  • The new version of MediaWiki (1.25wmf8) has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since November 12. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from November 18, and on all Wikipedias from November 19 (calendar).
  • The new search tool ("CirrusSearch") will be on the English Wikipedia from November 19. [54]

Move from Bugzilla to Phabricator

  • The tool to track bugs will change on November 21.
  • You won't be able to add or edit bugs between November 21 and November 24.
  • You can make the change easier for you by creating your account.
  • Bugzilla will be frozen after the change. You will see, edit and report bugs in Phabricator.
  • You can join two IRC chats to learn more about the change. The chats will be on Tuesday, November 18 at 16:00 (UTC) and 23:00 UTC. [55]

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

18:28, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello Fluffernutter. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular.

The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered.

If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.)

If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using {{db-g12|url=URL of source}}. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with {{subst:copyvio|url=URL of source}}.

Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors.

I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC).

       Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

email

Hello, Fluffernutter. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

DGG ( talk ) 17:49, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Got it, and replied. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:08, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-48

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

  • The move from Bugzilla to Phabricator is done. You can now report bugs in Phabricator. [56]

Problems

  • There was a problem when editing tables in VisualEditor. VisualEditor was trying to fix bad values for the colspan or rowspan option. VisualEditor now leaves the bad values to avoid making things worse. This was fixed on November 17. [57]

Software changes this week

  • The new version of MediaWiki (1.25wmf9) has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since November 19. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from November 25, and on all Wikipedias from November 26 (calendar).
  • You will be able to try VisualEditor on many new wikis for the first time. After November 26, VisualEditor will become available on Wikidata, Wikiquote, Wikibooks, Wikiversity, Wikivoyage, and Wikinews wikis. You can find it in your Beta options. [58]
  • VisualEditor now tells you if your edit needs to be approved. [59]
  • You can now use VisualEditor's tools directly when you resume editing after closing the save window. [60]
  • VisualEditor's table editing tools now work better in right-to-left languages. [61] [62]

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

19:31, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Thursday December 4: NYC Wiki-Salon and Skill Share

Thursday December 4: NYC Wiki-Salon and Skill Share

You are invited to join the the Wikimedia NYC community for our upcoming wiki-salon and knowledge-sharing workshop in Manhattan's Greenwich Village.

6:30pm–8pm at Babycastles, 137 West 14th Street

Afterwards at 8pm, we'll walk to a social wiki-dinner together at a neighborhood restaurant (to be decided).

We hope to see you there!--Pharos (talk) 07:11, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by removing your name from this list.)

I hope to attend this. I never got to meet other wikipedia editors offline and this is a good opportunity to get to know local editors that live in the NYC area. VegasCasinoKid (talk) 11:51, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 November 2014

A message left on my IP

Hullo! You left a message for me on User talk:92.26.124.162. Well, not me, actually; I didn't edit the page, so just to let you know whoever did the editing didn't get the message, and it's finally prompted me to make an account after all these years. So, thanks! And thanks for protecting the integrity of the Wiki. JojoScotia (talk) 21:51, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

@JojoScotia: That's great to hear, welcome to the project! A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 21:59, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Gelou

Thank you for your copyedit. I made some minor changes and answered your comments (in the edit summary). I hope my changes and comments are acceptable for you. Borsoka (talk) 04:37, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Looks good, Borsoka! I'm hoping to find some time today to finish up copyediting the rest of the article. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 14:48, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 December 2014

Tech News: 2014-50

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent software changes

  • All users are now getting pages from servers that run the HHVM tool. HHVM should make pages load faster. [63]
  • You can join a video chat about Phabricator on December 11 at 18:00 (UTC). Phabricator is the new tool to report issues. [64]

Problems

  • There was a problem with Phabricator on November 29. It was due to a network issue. [65]

Software changes this week

  • The new version of MediaWiki (1.25wmf11) has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since December 3. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from December 9. It will be on all Wikipedias from December 10 (calendar). [66]
  • You can now exit VisualEditor by pressing the "Esc" key. [67]
  • It is now easier to use VisualEditor with IMEs. Typing in Malayalam now works better. [68] [69]
  • The new version of OOjs UI fixed many issues with the size and layout of buttons in dialogs. [70] [71] [72]
  • (Lua) You can no longer use mw.text.unstrip to get the HTML from special page transclusion. You can see a list of scripts to fix. [73] [74]

Future changes

  • Starting next week JavaScript tools won't work if they use jQuery Migrate. [75]

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

17:11, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

66.87.121.63

Can you remove this IP's block and replace it with a rangeblock? 66.87.120.162 has made two edits at WP:AN3 on the same subject; it's clearly the same person. Nyttend (talk) 18:22, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

I ran this by a CU earlier today and they said this would be a pretty bad idea to rangeblock for more than a very short time; it's a mobile network and there would be a significant amount of collateral damage. We're sort of stuck with whac-a-mole. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:38, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
I rangeblocked without knowing about this discussion since the guy is now posting at WP:AN3. What I tried was a 3-day bock at 66.87.96.0/20 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)). You can revise or lift this as you think best. User:HelloAnnyong used to have a good tool for checking collateral but I'm not sure if it is still available. EdJohnston (talk) 18:44, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Rangeblocks are totally out of my comfort zone in general, so I'm ok leaving what you did to at least see if it helps. If there turns out to be a lot of unrelated unblock requests during the block, we can re-evaluate then. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:50, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Sock of 66.87.121.63

Please see 66.87.120.162 and Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Jytdog_reported_by_User:66.87.120.162_.28Result:_.29 Thanks! Jytdog (talk) 16:38, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

The onslaught seems to have stopped for now. I'll keep an eye on the IP for a while to make sure it doesn't start up again. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:05, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
And now blocked. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:38, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
thank you! Jytdog (talk) 21:45, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

GOCE coordinator elections

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors
Candidate nominations for Guild coordinators to serve from January 1 to June 30, 2015, are currently underway. The nomination period will close at 23:59 on December 15 (UTC), after which voting will commence until 23:59 on December 31, 2014. Self-nominations are welcomed. Please consider getting involved; it's your Guild and it won't coordinate itself, so if you'd like to help coordinate Guild activities we'd love to hear from you.

Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, and Miniapolis.
Message sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

User talk:129.7.135.136‎; 16:48

He's already been dealt with for his disruption, but I thought you should see my TP (most recent entry) for more of that image he keeps posting! Slightly bizarre behavior... Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 16:52, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, this is something who is...creative...with the truth, and has been at it for years. He pops up every now and then, sure one of us is Satan and that everyone needs to know, and we whack a bunch of socks calling people names, and then he subsides again for a while. Needless to say, I'm of the opinion that if that facebook post was made at all, it was probably made by our sockmaster using a joejob account. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 16:55, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
!!!! Cheers Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 17:01, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 December 2014

December 2014 GOCE newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors December 2014 Newsletter

Drive: Thanks to everyone who participated in November's Backlog Elimination Drive. Of the 43 people who signed up for this drive, 26 copy edited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

Progress report: The November Drive removed 26 requests from the Requests page and 509 articles from the {{copy edit}} backlog. We copy edited 83 articles tagged in the target months; July, August, and September 2013. Together with tag removals from articles unsuitable for copy editing, we eliminated July 2013 from the backlog and reduced August and September's tags to 61 and 70 respectively. As of 01:01, 1 December 2014 (UTC), the backlog stood at 1,974 articles, dipping below 2,000 for the first time in the Guild's history (see graph at right). Well done everyone!

Blitz: The December Blitz will run from December 14–20 and will focus on articles related to Religion, in recognition of this month's religious holidays in much of the English-speaking world. Awards will be given out to everyone who copy edits at least one of the target articles. Sign up here!

Election time again: The election of coordinators to serve from 1 January to 30 June 2015 is now underway. Candidates can nominate themselves or others from December 01, 00:01 (UTC), until December 15, 23:59. The voting period will run from December 16, 00:01 (UTC), until December 31, 23:59. You can read about coordinators' duties here. Please consider getting involved and remember to cast you vote—it's your Guild and it doesn't organize itself!

Thank you all once again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve anything without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, and Miniapolis.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:15, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-51

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent software changes

  • You may see a new tool tested on the mobile site of the English Wikipedia. It asks simple questions to make the article better. In the future, your answers will go to Wikidata. [76]
  • You can watch a video to learn how to use Phabricator to manage projects. [77]
  • You can test a new version of the Content Translation tool.

Software changes this week

  • The new version of MediaWiki (1.25wmf12) has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since December 10. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from December 16. It will be on all Wikipedias from December 17 (calendar). [78]
  • You can now find and replace text in VisualEditor. You can open the tool via the menu, Ctrl+F or Cmd+F. [79]
  • VisualEditor now doesn't change the space at the end of a text that you make bold. [80]
  • The "Apply changes" button in the reference window of VisualEditor is now disabled until you make a change. [81]

Future changes

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

16:43, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 December 2014

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fluffernutter/Archive_22&oldid=1085947482"