User talk:Govinda rajpurohit

Please fix citations at Draft:Commonfloor.com

Hello, see WP:Citations for how to clearly format your sources; which makes your article far more likely to be accepted. MatthewVanitas (talk) 04:45, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Advice on CommonFloot

Hello, Govinda rajpurohit. You have new messages at Draft:Commonfloor.com.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Commonfloor.com (December 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

MatthewVanitas offered some suggestions about using footnotes for references which need to be taken into account before this article can be accepted. Please do as much as possible to tie the articles in the External Links section to sentences in the text itself so that facts can be verified.

You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Commonfloor.com and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 19:21, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Commonfloor.com has been accepted

Commonfloor.com, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

TheMesquito^buzz 16:58, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lalit Mangal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 10:20, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lalit Mangal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lalit Mangal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lalit Mangal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 05:16, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 18 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Lalit Mangal page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Lalit Mangal. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:01, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Anand Prakash.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Anand Prakash.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 19:50, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lalit Mangal

Hello Govinda rajpurohit,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Lalit Mangal for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 16:38, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from AJIO. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mr. Nair Talk 11:16, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Govinda rajpurohit! Thank you for your contributions. I am Nairspecht and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Mr. Nair Talk 12:01, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AJIO (August 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

WP is for companies that have made their mark on history and/or society. A few months old startup is not that. Give it time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AJIO and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 22:17, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

LaMona - The page is already live at AJIO. Please consider draftifying it then. Best, Mr. Nair Talk 07:09, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Govinda rajpurohit, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 22:17, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dalmia Bharat Group

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dalmia Bharat Group, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 19:20, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello, Govinda rajpurohit. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 04:22, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Spaceman I am not getting paid for it. Recently i have joined small startup company supported by Dalmia Bharat Group and i tried to search it on wiki, there was no information about the group. That's how i decided to create an article for the Dalmia Bharat Group. Please help me to get it done. I will follow the guidelines.

It's quite clear (including by your admission above) that you have a conflict of interest here. Any further advertising edits without adhering to our terms of service will result in a block. Please read the above message and abide by our ToS and guidelines. —SpacemanSpiff 06:05, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Puneet Dalmia

Hello Govinda rajpurohit,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Puneet Dalmia for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Bradv 17:14, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hai Sir, Can you please check this article and please fix the problem, Arun Sureshkumar He is a wellknown person like Anand Prakash. Kindly please Fix the problem on Arun Sureshkumar (117.216.20.49 (talk) 07:09, 21 January 2017 (UTC))[reply]

January 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for undisclosed conflict of interest, advertising. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 07:34, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spiff may i know the reason ? why you have blocked my account?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Govinda rajpurohit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I Never edited or created article for advertising purpose and I don't know Puneet Dalmia personally I dont have any idea why i got blocked Govinda rajpurohit (talk) 09:21, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

>I Never edited or created article for advertising purpose
Bullshit. MER-C 09:29, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Govinda rajpurohit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Should I start my contribution somewhere else ? I dont know what's wrong I did whatever articles I have created those all were really needed to be on wiki. Please let me know if I will able to add/edit articles again.Its been more than a year whenever I see anything on wiki which is totaly not true and I feel bad.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 14:43, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yamla

1. I will make useful contributions instead.

Yamla Could you please let me know that I will get unblocked or not? please guide me what i have to to further. I can't edit any article and I can't even edit your talk page to get attention.

Notice

You are not allowed to remove declined block requests. See WP:BLANKING for details. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 04:30, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:AJIO concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:AJIO, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:AJIO

Hello, Govinda rajpurohit. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "AJIO".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 01:46, 27 July 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Govinda rajpurohit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21039 was submitted on Mar 28, 2018 15:12:00. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 15:12, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Govinda rajpurohit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, the block is no longer necessary because I understand what I have been blocked for, Iwill not continue to cause damage or disruption, and Iwill make useful contributions instead. In my knowledge I haven't tried to do anything wrong but if you think I did than please guide me I will not let that happen again. Thanks

Decline reason:

There's not reason to unblock you if you're going to continue pursuing SEO and promotional activities. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:16, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Anand Prakash for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anand Prakash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anand Prakash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nizil (talk) 11:41, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ajio-logo.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ajio-logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Willy1018 (talk) 14:05, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Willy1018 I don't care about what you people do with my contributions to wiki, there was a time when I used to admire Wikipedia's equal policies. Good days are over :(

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Govinda rajpurohit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

to prove wikipedia is no more a neutral community

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:04, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As you are now just wasting our time, I have revoked your access to this talk page. This leaves you with WP:UTRS once this unblock request is reviewed. I suggest not wasting their time. --Yamla (talk) 19:53, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vikas Malpani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vikas Malpani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vikas Malpani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. M4DU7 (talk) 18:38, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]