User talk:IdiotSavant/Archive 1

I noticed you were new, and wanted to share some links I thought useful:

For more information click here. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~

Talkback

Hello, IdiotSavant. You have new messages at Billy685's talk page.
Message added 21:59, 17 June 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Thanks for the update IdiotSavant. I am a new wikipedia user and hoping to add in on subjects regarding Samoa. I guess i have to try and get this content in line with the guidelines then. It would be a challenge and should take some time but if i might add it's sad to see so much of the info on Samoa are outdated as well as its so called reliable sources. Regards --Billy685 (talk) 04:47, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I've done some work on MPs, but I've been focusing on the Cook Islands and Tonga recently in preparation for their elections later this year. Samoa's are due in 2011, and it would be good to have a basic stub bio of all current MPs, plus better information on parties and electorates by then. --IdiotSavant (talk) 05:22, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Capital punishment in Suriname

please take a look at your suggested page, Capital punishment in Suriname--CrashTestSmartie (talk) 08:42, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice maps!

		The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
		Awarded for your work on signatory maps relating to human rights conventions. -- Kendrick7^talk

New Zealand Labour Party

I quick failed the GA listing for New Zealand Labour Party because the article was almost entirely unsourced. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 01:17, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick response. So, I need to make sure that things are seriously referenced - difficult with pre-web topics such as political parties, but there are always books... IdiotSavant (talk) 01:26, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

Hi, I saw that you nominated this article for a GA review. Although I don't have time to do full reviews these days, I left a few suggestions on the article's talk page. GaryColemanFan (talk) 19:38, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hello

I apologise for not giving you comprehensive guidance earlier. once refs sorted I should be able to pass it. separately: to make article more compreshensive strongly suggest adding section on impact/critical appraisal of the covenant. cheers Tom (talk) 13:47, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cool; I was wondering where to go to head towards an FA; now I know. --IdiotSavant (talk) 13:49, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I better ask for a 2nd opinion as i've got quite involved. Tom (talk) 14:28, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's made it a better article, and its been a learning process as well. --IdiotSavant (talk) 14:42, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stub nomination notification

Greetings! A stub template or category which you created has been nominated for renaming at Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion. Please feel free to make any comments there. The relevant category is Category:Cook Islands politician stubs. Thanks, Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 00:51, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Parliament of the Cook Islands

No worries, will do. --Lholden (talk) 01:54, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Much thanks for making the citations on the Gordon Nuttall page good. Regards, Cablehorn —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cablehorn (talk • contribs) 21:46, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OP-ICESCR

Could you update the map with Italy, Armenia and Timor-Leste as new signatories, please? 89.191.112.246 (talk) 20:18, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Could you include Latvia (signed in 2008. Besides, I'll pay attention that the link to list of member states on the image's page isn't working) as signatory to the image CRPD-members.PNG? 89.191.112.246 (talk) 23:28, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Independent National Party

Hi there, I supported the proposed deletion of the article, but just to let you know in the future if you want to delete an article that you created and if nobody else has made a significant contribution to it, you can ask for it to be speedily deleted with a {{db-author}} tag. That would probably have deleted the article in a matter of hours rather than a week. Just an FYI, thanks! -- Atama頭 21:47, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So how do I do the deletion? --IdiotSavant (talk) 23:51, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You simply type "{{db-author}}" on the article page Lanma726 (talk) 00:57, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:IndependentNationalPartyLogo.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:IndependentNationalPartyLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:19, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, IdiotSavant. You have new messages at Kiwiteen123's talk page.
Message added 07:48, 25 October 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

kiwiteen123 (talk) 07:48, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, IdiotSavant. You have new messages at Kiwiteen123's talk page.
Message added 00:18, 26 October 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

kiwiteen123 (talk) 00:18, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

howdy

I left a message on the WikiProject Human Rights talk page. Khin2718 (talk) 17:53, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

I'm going to be away for a while so....

Kiwiteen123 (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thanks for your help this year, I look forward to working together next year. Kiwiteen123 (talk) 02:32, 14 December 2009 (UTC) P.S Is this you? Wikipedia brings all sorts together... Kiwiteen123 (talk) 02:32, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women

The article Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women for things which need to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 11:06, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Barnstar of Liberty
		Hi, thanks for all your excellent work on on the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, you more than deserve a barnstar for it! I recently picked up the article on the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights & saw you have already done most of the hard work expanding it except for on the articles themselves, and I am hoping that with some work it match the ICESCR article - i am making a start but your excellent prose style and explanation would go a long way to helping that; and it would be great if you did decide to pick up where you left off! Ajbpearce (talk) 23:48, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom/Article title

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom/Article title. DrKiernan (talk) 09:08, 18 March 2010 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}})[reply]

Hey there!

Hello!

Can you help me read more about "WikiProjects" and their purposes. Maybe I did not understand them right. Thanks Aregakn (talk) 10:54, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:59, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mana by-election, 2010

On 23 August 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mana by-election, 2010, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 06:02, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Politics task force

Hi there, thanks for continuing to add political parties. That's great to see. When you put the WPNZ banner on the talk page, please remember to also include the politics parameters: |politics=yes|politics-importance=low I've just added these to the New Munster Party.

We did a bot run back in July (I think). Every article that has been created since that falls within the scope of the politics task force needs to be tagged manually. If you've got any queries, please put a talkback message onto my talk page. {{tb}} Schwede 66 18:29, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Both is still true - thanks for writing new articles, and please include the politics parameters when placing the WPNZ template (e.g. Talk:OurNZ Party). Cheers, Schwede 66 23:33, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Independent Greens of Virginia

You have a previous edit on this article or its discussion, so FYI: Talk:Independent Greens of Virginia#Material by editor "PonchoChet". Let's try to make the article better. -Colfer2 (talk) 20:08, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

the Tonga Government Portal likes your work

Hi there! Not sure if you're interested or not, but I noticed that several articles you created/developed have been "borrowed" by the Tonga Government Portal... for example: http://www.mic.gov.to/appointments/new-ministers-/2010-hon-sosefo-feao-vakata-moteys-minister ...seems to contain your paragraphs from Sosefo Fe’aomoeata Vakata. Are you flattered? ;) Dracunculus (talk) 22:35, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it is under CC-by-SA and GFDL. But they should be attributing to Wikipedia. --IdiotSavant (talk) 11:51, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well exactly, the licenses specify that they should give attribution, and also re-license the new material under the same/similar license. Mostly I was concerned that someone would think this was a copyvio, so I left notes on the talk pages for future reference. And I thought you might be amused by the situation :D Dracunculus (talk) 15:10, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of New Zealand Tea Party for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Zealand Tea Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Zealand Tea Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Yaksar (let's chat) 07:10, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2011 Tauranga oil spill article

I see that you created the 2011 Tauranga oil spill article at about the same time as I created the Rena oil spill redirect. What is the best article title? My choice was based on the fact that two separate news sites used "Rena oil spill". -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 04:54, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not fussed - list of oil spills uses both styles. --IdiotSavant (talk) 04:56, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Have put it up for discussion on the talk page. Let's see what other think. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 05:16, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pirate Party of Greece

The article Pirate Party of Greece has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ORG. Hasn't had significant coverage in reliable third-party sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kosm1fent ^{Won't you talk to me?} 14:03, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pirate Party Cyprus

The article Pirate Party Cyprus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ORG. Hasn't had significant coverage in reliable third-party sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kosm1fent ^{Won't you talk to me?} 14:05, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello IdiotSavant/Archive 1! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Proposed deletion of New Economics Party

The article New Economics Party has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable political party, with no independent sources. Page created during election campaign.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:22, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ordinary Kiwis Party/Reform NZ

I'd suggest that you take the Ordinary Kiwis Party and Reform New Zealand to AfD now that your prods have been contested. Surely two parties that have never contested an election and never registered are not notable? Mattlore (talk) 20:47, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was considering that, and investigating the process. --IdiotSavant (talk) 20:52, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:OrdinaryKiwisPartyLogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:OrdinaryKiwisPartyLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:42, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PositiveMoneyNewZealandLogo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PositiveMoneyNewZealandLogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:36, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New MP pages

If you have time before Friday evening, your help with this politics task force collaboration would be much appreciated! If you have questions, please ask them there. Schwede 66 07:31, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OP-ICESR + ICESCR

Could you please update the map with Argentina as member state (and ICESCR.png with Papua New Guinea, Ukraine and Pakistan)?Fuseau (talk) 00:16, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As I see, now the ICESCR article uses another file, so changing ICESCR.png is probably not necessary (if it won't be updated, possibly it would be reasonable to delete it?), but File:ICESCR-OP-members.png still is used and needs updating.Fuseau (talk) 14:45, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pirate Party of Argentina

A tag has been placed on Pirate Party of Argentina, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Not an officially recognised political party, not even a registerd NGO. Just a mailing list, and facebook/twitter accounts. Not a member of nor observer of Pirate Parties International. Vanity page

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Cinabrium (talk) 19:05, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Ppplogo4.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Ppplogo4.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:04, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dead people

Just a reminder that Category:Dead people is a container category, and should never be applied directly to articles. If you know the appropriate year, such as Category:2012 deaths, that is sufficient by itself. (If you don't know the year, use Category:Year of death missing instead.) — Paul A (talk) 01:34, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP Human Rights in the Signpost

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Human Rights for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. –Mabeenot (talk) 17:37, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Pirate party estonia.gif)

Thanks for uploading File:Pirate party estonia.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:04, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1Law4All Party

Just curious about your justification for calling 1Law4All colour-blind. I realise they call themselves that, but abolishing the Waitangi Tribunal seems to be removing property-rights from an ethnic group, thus not very colour-blind at all. Haminoon (talk) 09:31, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In order to avoid problems with NPOV, I decided to use their own words (and wikilink to the ideology behind it) rather than just call them racists. As the party gets more media attention I'm sure there will be scope to add a section on "criticism" to the article quoting those views. --IdiotSavant (talk) 10:54, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pakeha Party for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pakeha Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pakeha Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pakeha Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Māori (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of KapCon

The article KapCon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Limited coverage by reliable and independent sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Esw01407 (talk) 14:41, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Toanui Isamaela

The article Toanui Isamaela has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Blethering Scot 17:57, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Unified New Zealand Party Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Unified New Zealand Party Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:21, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ban 1080 Party for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ban 1080 Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ban 1080 Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:28, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Conservative Party of New Zealand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Mitchell. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Biman Prasad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fijian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:1Law4AllLogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:1Law4AllLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:32, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NZICPartyLogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NZICPartyLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:28, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pakeha Party for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pakeha Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pakeha Party (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Haminoon (talk) 04:57, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tai Tura

The article Tai Tura has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -- Patchy1 REF THIS BLP 08:03, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Toanui Isamaela

The article Toanui Isamaela has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -- Patchy1 10:02, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of political parties in Southern Asia by country

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on List of political parties in Southern Asia by country requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:13, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aotearoa Legalise Cannabis Party

Hi mate, I see you've moved the article to Cannabis Party (New Zealand). However, based on this [1] they have only changed their abbreviation from "ACLP" to "The Cannabis Party", this is backed up by their entry on the register of political parties [2] where they are still called the Aotearoa Legalise Cannabis Party but their "Abbreviation" is The Cannabis Party. Can you review and move the article back please. Mattlore (talk) 01:54, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Challenge for Oceania and Australia

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Oceania/The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge are up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. The Australia challenge would feed into the wider region one and potentially New Zealand could have a smaller challenge too. The main goal is content improvement, tackling stale old stubs and important content and improving sourcing/making more consistent but new articles are also welcome if sourced. I understand that this is a big goal for regular editors, especially being summertime where you are, but if you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Oceania and Australia like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1700 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for the region but fuelled by a series of contests to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. The Africa contest scaled worldwide would naturally provide great benefits to Oceania countries, particularly Australia and attract new editors. I would like some support from existing editors here to get the Challenges off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile and potentially bring about hundreds of improvements in a few weeks through a contest! Cheers.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NWOPartyLogo.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NWOPartyLogo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:05, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RAMPartyLogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RAMPartyLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:16, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of New World Order Party

The article New World Order Party has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to be a notable political party. Nearly all references are to primary sources and very little secondary source coverage can be found online.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mz7 (talk) 03:07, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, IdiotSavant. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, IdiotSavant. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sustainable New Zealand Party has been accepted

Sustainable New Zealand Party, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MurielMary (talk) 08:35, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]