User talk:JackETC

JackETC, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi JackETC!! You're invited to play The Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive game to become a great contributor to Wikipedia. It's a fun interstellar journey--learn how to edit Wikipedia in about an hour. We hope to see you there!

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:40, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jay Kennedy-Harris

The article Jay Kennedy-Harris has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ——MelbourneStar☆^talk 22:49, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Will Langford

Disposals = 35

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Goulburn Valley Football League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Blake (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw that you posted on the bot's talk page that you didn't understand the message above. I suggest you click on the link to Mark Blake. As you will see, there are a number of notable people by that name. You probably meant Mark Blake (Australian rules footballer); if so, you should edit the article Goulburn Valley Football League so that a reader who clicks on that link will see the article about the right Mark Blake. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 13:33, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Explaining

I patrolled your page. I went through the enormously-backlogged list of newly-created pages and confirmed that your page was okay: not spam, not an attack page, not a copyright violation, not any of the other reasons for which I would delete someone's page without asking. Then I clicked "patrolled" to remove it from the list of "pages that have not yet been patrolled", and moved on to the next entry. That's all. DS (talk) 00:07, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have to save the page after every tiny edit, just use the preview button.

Thanks for letting me know not to sound rude or anything I do it on purpose because I want to get my edit count up but if it illegal or something I'll stop

Thanks

58.96.126.138

your multiple editing practice

Hi,

The following users have already mentioned this to you: DS, myself, The-Pope and Melbourne3163. Your practice of multiple edits for simple changes is distracting to other user's editing of Wikipedia. You have asked for explanations and have received them:

It confuses users who are editing the page at the same time as you, as my confusion was when we edited Dayne Beams at the same time and you had only updated his game count and not the stats update time, and therefore I almost added an extra game to him.
The number of edits a user has is almost meaningless. Nobody looks at this number, and a user's quality isn't judged by the number of edits, but rather by the quality of the edits.
It floods the watchlist and the recent changes list and makes it harder to spot if other users have made inappropriate edits.
(adding this one now) Micro-editing takes more time, which you could use for other things, such as bettering a larger number of articles.

We would all very much appreciate if you desist from this practice.

Thanks,

--SuperJew (talk) 17:27, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I fully support all four comments. Cheers, Melbourne3163 (talk) 22:03, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Following up from your answer on my talk page, Yes we would like you to do the whole stats change in one edit. In one edit change from "Player with X goals in Y games as of round Z" to "Player with X+1 goals in Y+1 games as of round Z+1". Also, it is bad form to delete other users' posts from your talk page, unless you are archiving them. --SuperJew (talk) 05:13, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

a helpful suggestion

I also noticed you're using your user page to experiment with articles and such. There is a sandbox area (you can access it at the link in the top row next to the links to your user page and talk page) which is intended exactly for those experiments. It would probably be easier and more organized and then you can use your user page for stuff about you. --SuperJew (talk) 05:17, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

you use the sandbox area exactly as any page - just editing. It is simply a page within your userspace specifically for test edits. You don't have to use it, I just thought you might find it better then test editing on your user page. for an example you can see how I used my sandbox by looking at its history. --SuperJew (talk) 08:58, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kurt Tippett may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| games(goals) = 104 (188)<br>14 (41(<br>'''118 (229)'''
|}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:34, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Adelaide Thunderbirds may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{s-aft|after= {{inc}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:18, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Adelaide Thunderbirds may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{s-aft|after={{s-inc}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:27, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Dale Morris (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Daniel Cross

Daniel Cross (footballer) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Daniel Cross

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Big list of players

Hi there, I just found the Template:AFL Players list that you made. Like a lot of your edits, I'm not really sure what you are trying to achieve. Whatever it is, it should not be in template namespace & until it is completed, it should really be in your sandbox or draft namespace. Regards The-Pope (talk) 14:55, 27 May 2014 (UTC) I'll put it in my sandbox.[reply]

Dustin Fletcher talk page

I'm not sure why you want a daily count down on Talk:Dustin Fletcher over 80 days to Fletcher becoming the fifth oldest AFL player. How does a daily update help the discussion of how to improve the article? I'd suggest you take a quick look at WP:Talk and decide whether 80 daily updates fits in with that policy. Perhaps it would be easier, just as effective and more in line with WP policy to simply note on the talk page that on a certain date the article needs to be updated for the milestone?Wikipeterproject (talk) 19:27, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cam Ellis-Yolmen

Hello JackETC,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Cam Ellis-Yolmen for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Moonchïld9 (talk) 00:53, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cam Ellis-Yolmen

Hello JackETC,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Cam Ellis-Yolmen for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits?

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Moonchïld9 (talk) 00:54, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:AFL Players

A tag has been placed on Template:AFL Players requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. The-Pope (talk) 16:23, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2013 International Rules Series may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|| 5. [[Sean Cavanagh|Seán Cavanagh]] || [[Tyrone GAA|Tyrone]] || || 28. [[Cam!Ellis-Yolmen|Cameron Ellis-Yolmen]† || [[Adelaide Crows|Adelaide]] ||

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:41, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple Sandboxes

Just to let you know, you can have as many sandboxes or user sub pages as you want - as long as they are wikipedia related. ie, you don't need to lump everything together in User:JackETC/sandbox, you can have User:JackETC/sandbox2, User:JackETC/Article under development, User:JackETC/2014AFLPlayers User:JackETC/sandboxToDo, User:JackETC/What I'm trying out too. Be careful about claiming to have been hacked, if you say it too loud, someone might block you as you account isn't secure. Read WP:BRO too. The-Pope (talk) 04:04, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shane Kersten, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Fremantle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Alex Woodward

Hi, I'm I dream of horses. JackETC, thanks for creating Alex Woodward!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I've made some minor edits to the article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 06:35, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mass unnecessary edits

Hi Jack. Could you please stop making multiple edits to the one article when you could easily do it with just one edit? Check out this, which I use to keep track of edits to Melbourne player articles. It's flooded with your edits to List of Collingwood Football Club players! For the sake of everyone who also edits footy articles, could you please make an effort to stop this? Cheers, Jenks24 (talk) 21:39, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:AFL Coaches Association Champion Player of the Year

A tag has been placed on Template:AFL Coaches Association Champion Player of the Year requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jevansen (talk) 02:22, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Allen Christensen (footballer), especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. Jevansen (talk) 23:09, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Cricket World Cup centuries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University Oval. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:58.96.125.138/things

Yes, I created it, and use this link to monitor changes http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?namespace=&target=User%3A58.96.125.138%2Fthings&tagfilter=&limit=500&title=Special%3ARecentChangesLinked

"my new site that is a collabration of everything" You're already posting on one.

Category:AFL Rising Star nominees

Category:AFL Rising Star nominees, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The-Pope (talk) 12:11, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't the outer at the footy, bigfooty, Facebook or Twitter. Don't abuse people. Read the guidelines and follow them. A category of nominees is never going to be accepted here. Sorry you've wasted your time, but that happens. Cheers, The-Pope (talk) 07:17, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Josh Glenn

Hi there, I was just wondering why you moved Josh Glenn to Joshua Glenn (footballer)? Most refs I've seen call him Josh, not Joshua, and it's generally better to chose a non-qualified article name. The-Pope (talk) 14:10, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Updates to Collingwood

Hey,

Really appreciate your help keeping Collingwood player pages updated on stats (especially Bucks, as I seem to keep on forgetting to update him). I'm flying to the US tomorrow morn, and prob won't be able to be on here till the end of August. Would greatly appreciate you picking up the tab on keeping the players' stats updated and also keep the season page updated.

Cheers! --SuperJew (talk) 08:49, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah no worries mate will do you got all the updates for round 7 up to date? --JackETC

Yep, round 7 is up-to-date. Thanks mate! --SuperJew (talk) 09:17, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reported to ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Flickerd (talk) 07:42, 15 June 2015 (UTC) Cool? idc mate go sook to someone else you sook.. not here I don't deal with sooks... look at the message above and you'll see I mean more to Wikipedia than you JackETC (talk) 07:47, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting that you interpreted my comments above as me being able to take abuse, rather than as a warning to stop abusing people. I think you need to realise that it doesn't matter how good YOU think you contributions are, nor how good we think SOME of your contributions are, if you can't treat this as an encyclopedia, not a forum/twitter/facebook etc, then you'll keep tripping up and getting blocked. Think of this as the library, or your granny's house, not your mates place or the footy. Take your 24 hrs to think about that, and hope you grow up a bit when you return. The-Pope (talk) 09:57, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This [1] is nowhere near acceptable. Not even close. Guy (Help!) 07:55, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Hi, might have a possible partnership

It would be a privilege for me. Thanks for your offer. — Swastik Chakraborty (User talk) 10:59, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daniel Rioli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NTFL. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism of List of Australian supercentenarians

Your recent multiple edits of this article are annoying as there is no need to save a dozen edits whenever updating a Wikipedia article. Furthermore, you have not provided and supporting evidence to show that the six living Australians claiming to be over 110 years old actually as old as they claim to be. Without verification they will remain on the unverified list.Crveni5 (talk) 11:19, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits of the Australian supercentenarian article shows that the article was modified by you in a piecemeal manner, not because you fixed errors you claim you made. Furthermore your condescending response is not justified. Work in a constructive manner which benefits all users of Wikipedia. Crveni5 (talk) 11:07, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

help on a project

Hi,

I remember you like boosting your edit count. If you want, have a look at this project here. It entitles adding categories or correct links to player pages, easy micro-editing like you love ;) --SuperJew (talk) 08:33, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, JackETC. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, JackETC. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, JackETC. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page List of National Basketball Association career rebounding leaders has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. ^{Babymissfortune} 11:02, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]