Jump to content

User talk:Markreidyhp

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
User:Markreidyhp
User:Markreidyhp
   
User talk:Markreidyhp
User talk:Markreidyhp
   
user:Markreidyhp/sandbox
user:Markreidyhp/sandbox
   
user:Markreidyhp/The Wiki times
user:Markreidyhp/The Wiki times
   
{{{link}}}
{{{link}}}
   
{{{link}}}
{{{link}}}
   
{{{link}}}
{{{link}}}
   
                           

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Markreidyhp for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. --Mdebets (talk) 21:36, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Markreidyhp (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

There my roomate's sockpuppets, not mine. He just discoverd wikipedia and used two account because he did not know that it was against the rules.His real account is Davxs I think Plus I did not Know what he was doing (he was using the other computer)until I saw the bock I'll get him to Sign on on another computer if you wantand he will tell you that it was HIM

Decline reason:

Great. You aren't blocked, so I conclude that you're caught by your sock's autoblock. And because I don't believe in that old story about a roommate/young brother/colleague/grandma, I've blocked you indefinitely for sock puppetry. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 07:26, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Markreidyhp (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

No! not forever! editing wikipedia is the only thing i look forward to most days. They are user Davxs not mine! We use the same computer and go to the same school and are twins. So we are very similar.Please unblock me!I nerver even logged on as those sock puppets! I didn't fully understand sockpuppets untill now!Markreidyhp 13:45, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

So, "very similar" twins, not roommates any more. Uh huh. Pretty clear case of abusive sockpuppet accounts. — Yamla (talk) 13:48, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Markreidyhp (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

If you look at my contributions and user Davxes and all his sock puppets you will see that some of them are at the same time.Markreidyhp 15:27, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Obvious sock, now abusing unblock request. — KnightLago (talk) 17:54, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

File:Irish Bio stub.jpg listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Irish Bio stub.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:06, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Proposed WP-IE barnstar.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of East Meath for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article East Meath is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East Meath until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Iveagh Gardens (talk) 07:20, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]