User talk:Mikkyly

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Drm310 🍁 (talk) 05:36, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guideline. If you believe that your user page does not violate our guideline, please leave a note on this page. Alternatively, you may add {{Db-u1}} to the top of the page in question and an administrator will delete it, or you can simply edit the page so that it meets Wikipedia's user page guideline. Posting a number of external links to social media can be viewed as self-promotional. Please consider removing these links. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 05:37, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 2)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

David.moreno72 08:46, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mikkyly! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 08:46, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or it will be deleted

See above advice that your blog, Instagram and Twitter accounts are not appropriate content for your User page. David notMD (talk) 20:50, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm. Just seeing this. I'll act accordingly. Thanks. Mikkyly (talk) 09:19, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Mikkyly

A tag has been placed on User:Mikkyly requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Theroadislong (talk) 21:00, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good day. Does this deletion mean I can never contribute on Wikipedia ever again? I'll be really glad if I could still upload articles here. My suspended post was an ignorantly, honest mistake.I'm quite new here and that was my first contribution. I honestly thought that box was for me to fill in my personal information, attached with link for proper verification by Wikipedia. It honestly wasn't for selfish reasons or to raise funds from this platform. Please pardon me and it'd never repeat itself. I have several legit contributions to make here. Please, I won't want to be suspended nor deleted from this platform. Please.

Thanks a million. Mikkyly (talk) 09:45, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Mikkyly/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Mikkyly/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 21:01, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Mikkyly. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 21:02, 2 November 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Mikkyly! You created a thread called Please why was my post rejected? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Mikkyly! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, What does -32 written in red mean in a Users contribution?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recent image uploads

You recently uploaded multiple much needed and high quality images for various Nigerian celebrities and they were licensed "own work". Permit me to ask, are you a professional photographer? Did you use your camera to get the images? HandsomeBoy (talk) 15:29, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Awoyungbo Olugbenga

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Awoyungbo Olugbenga, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. firefly ( t · c ) 12:08, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Awoyungbo Olugbenga

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Awoyungbo Olugbenga, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://www.vanguardngr.com/2019/08/meet-awoyungbo-olugbenga-jackson-aka-jacksonfirce-the-ceo-of-fierce-nation/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mvqr (talk) 15:32, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of points you should know about

Hello, Mikkyly. I have replied to your query on my talk page, and as I was doing so I thought of a couple of other things which may be worth mentioning to you. Since they are more likely to be convenient for future reference on your talk page than on mine, I am posting them here.

Firstly, a large proportion of your editing has been unmistakably promotional in character. That is probably for one of two reasons: either you are editing on behalf of clients to promote them, or you aren't, but because you work in marketing and PR, a promotional style comes naturally to you. My guess is that the first of those two possibilities is more likely, but either way Wikipedia content should be written from a neutral point of view, and material which reads as promotional is unacceptable. Also if you are editing on behalf of clients then before you do any more editing you need to be aware of Wikipedia's guideline on "conflict of interest". The full guideline is available from this link, but the essential points are as follows. If you are connected to someone or something you have written about (a few examples are writing about yourself, your business, your band, a member of your family, your client) then you should be aware that Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline discourages you from writing about that subject. The main reason for that is that experience over the years indicates that editors with such a connection to a subject they are writing about are likely to find it very difficult, or even impossible, to stand back from their writing and see how it will look from the detached perspective of an outsider, so that they are likely to write in ways that look promotional to others, even if they sincerely think they are writing in a neutral way. Also, if your editing forms all or part of work for which you are paid, whether as an employee, as a contractor, or in any other capacity, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require you to state who is paying you, and what your connection to them is. (To avoid the possibility of a surprisingly common misunderstanding, editing is part of paid work if it is done as part of normal employment or as part of a work to a contract, whether or not a specific payment earmarked for editing Wikipedia is made.)

Secondly, much of your editing has been adding links from Wikipedia articles to other Wikipedia articles (known as "Wikilinks"). A Wikilink should be used only when it serves to help readers of an article to understand that article, normally for one of two reasons: (1) because the linked article has further information about the subject of the article containing the link, or (2) because the linked article explains the meaning of a word or expression which is used in the article containing the link and which a significant proportion of readers are likely to need explained. Linking to ordinary common words which don't need explanation is not only unnecessary, it can actually be harmful, because research has shown that the more unimportant links there are, the less likely are readers to find the important ones. JBW (talk) 18:34, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aisha Tisha Mohammed for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aisha Tisha Mohammed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aisha Tisha Mohammed until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:40, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, i sense some level of blas. Aisha Tisha Mohammed, is a notable actress in the Nigerian industry and doing a thorough google search on her will be a fair thing to do. Ogayellowfoot (talk) 21:14, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of P~Gold Exchange

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on P~Gold Exchange, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fram (talk) 15:02, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nlemchukwu Godswill O

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nlemchukwu Godswill O, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CUPIDICAE💕 19:24, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NewsOnline Nigeria moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, NewsOnline Nigeria, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 19:26, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My Name Is Kadi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, My Name Is Kadi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 19:27, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I read that article 'My Name Is Kadi' and it had quite reliable source for a film. Ogayellowfoot (talk) 21:06, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hi Mikkyly! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Olamide discography that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. PhantomTech[talk] 04:24, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mercy George-Igbafe

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mercy George-Igbafe, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Reading Beans (talk) 15:34, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This was a very poor decision. Mikkyly (talk) 15:16, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

As should be evident from the messages above, you have been creating too many inappropriate articles, including many which were blatant promotion. The creation of inappropriate articles is disruptive and wasteful of other editors' time. Before you attempt to create another article, please carefully review our policies on notability, neutrality, and if necessary, conflict of interest. I also strongly recommend that, until you gain more experience, you utilize the draft and articles for creation review process rather than attempting to create directly in mainspace. Should you once again create an inappropriate article, it is very likely that you will be blocked from editing. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 16:58, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In my defense, i strongly advise you go back to other post i created that ended up being deleted. I am forced to jump into the conclusion that most people are out here, solely to frustrate people's honest efforts, feeling like gods in Wikipedia, which is totally unfair and really unprofessional. I have made some very vital edits here on wiki, how come no one came out to call them promotional But it's all good, maybe we should just leave Wikipedia for high and mighty.

Thanks for pointing this out, i will also appreciate more constructive criticism. Mikkyly (talk) 15:13, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If I thought you had ill intentions in general, I would have just blocked you, rather than giving a warning. It is always my hope when giving a warning that it will make a block not necessary. But, while no one intends to frustrate you, Wikipedia does not permit promotional material. It seems you are rather a fan of some of the things you write about, so it's especially necessary in those cases to make sure you avoid editorializing and puff terms, and stick strictly to stating facts verified by reliable and independent sources. Just state facts, don't try to embellish them or puff them up. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 20:52, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much.

I genuinely appreciate you pointing this out and not going straight to blocking me. But shortly after i saw your message, i got another message, stating i have been blocked indefinitely. How do i get unblocked? I would really appreciate your guidance.

Warm regards. Mikkyly (talk) 07:59, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for coordinated promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:14, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinated WP:PAID/promotional editing. See the edit history of Freedompack and Tawakalituabeke who are Confirmed to each other and all edit the same cluster of articles.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:14, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mikkyly (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have carefully read on better ways to contribute on Wikipedia. I was warned severally about publishing promotional article, which i didn't adhere to. I have realized where i went wrong and i promise to stop all forms of promotional articles once unblocked, and stick strictly to making constructive contributions here. if if there is a need to publish an article, i will request general approval and edits, as against directly publishing it into Wikipedia's article space. Mikkyly (talk) 12:53, 8 January 2023 (UTC) [reply]

Decline reason:

I feel bad because I think you are very sincere. But ... your unblock request just still suggests that you're not quite sure you can control yourself. And I still don't think you've properly addressed the meatpuppetry allegations. So, I'm declining, and since these four requests haven't gone anywhere and are not likely to go further, I will be revoking access to this talk page after saving. You will still have a private way to request unblock, but ... I would advise against it, at least for a while. Wikipedia may not be the right fit for you, no matter how badly you may want it to be. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:25, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Mikkyly (talk) 12:53, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mikkyly (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I honestly wasn't coordinating promotion. Perhaps, my mode of writing made it seem so. Please, don't just unblock me, i will appreciate if you guide me on how best to contribute to Wikipedia, without being flagged or breaking rules. Study links will be genuinely appreciated. Thanks Mikkyly (talk) 08:10, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No, I think we can do without your contributions, nor will we help you further avoid detection. 331dot (talk) 08:39, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mikkyly (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i i want's intentionally creating promotions. Kindly go through other edits i have made on different articles. Please be just with your judgements Mikkyly (talk) 15:26, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

First of all, this doesn't really make sense. There is nothing special about English Wikipedia. It is not the "prestige version" of Wikipedia. There is likely a version of Wikipedia in your native language. When editing the version of Wikipedia in your native language, there is a much greater chance that you'll understand and be able to follow the rules, and you'll be able to communicate much more effectively with other people. Second, this doesn't address the reason why you were blocked. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:41, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mikkyly (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i messed up badly and i have been studying ever since to learn the best ways to contribute here. i am appealing to be unblocked on the terms that i be monitored by everyone, to make sure i don't make such mistakes again, and if i do, please do not hold back on permanently blocking me @Ponyo@NinjaRobotPirate@Seraphimblade@ Mikkyly (talk) 10:01, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please see WP:GAB to understand how to craft an appropriate unblock request. There's no benefit to us to unblock you if everyone has to closely monitor you. Yamla (talk) 11:04, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Daniel Case (talk) 07:26, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:My Name Is Kadi

Hello, Mikkyly. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:My Name Is Kadi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:My Name Is Kadi

Hello, Mikkyly. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "My Name Is Kadi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 17:42, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]