User talk:MindSlayer13
Coderdaddy1369, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Coderdaddy1369! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 26 July 2018 (UTC) |
August 2018
[edit]
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:120.138.109.82. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Nthep (talk) 15:11, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Leo Bertos, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:14, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Lalrindika Ralte. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 12:54, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Lalrindika Ralte. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:49, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Lalrindika Ralte, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:06, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Updating career status
[edit]For the players of east Bengal and Mohun Bagan only i-league statistics are considered as career statistics .pls stop adding Calcutta league statistics. Haritrams24 (talk) 02:53, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
its a FIFA accredited league so it should be added too
August 2018
[edit] Please do not add or change content, as you did at Alejandro Menéndez, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. RRD (talk) 13:02, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion. Shellwood (talk) 12:06, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
.
[edit]be careful...... Sávy (talk) 13:46, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
updates can you pls do these things:
this history part on mb page needs linking of last word (entity) as i did on unlocked mb history page: ATK Mohun Bagan Private Limited ATK and Mohun Bagan had decided to merge its football division back in January 2020 that would help Mohun Bagan enter the ISL and AFC Cup from the 2020-21 season, under the name of ATK Mohun Bagan.
then if see infobox here, copy for mb multisports page(departments, top, move merge request...): https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/A.E.K._(sports_club)
finally, on 2021-21 i league no east bengal, but on main page still listed...best is wait for isl as looks like surely no more i league:
www.indiatvnews.com/amp/sports/football-east-bengal-must-declare-ownership-change-in-10-days-or-face-i-league-exit-634207 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.172.187.10 (talk) 17:52, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GiantSnowman 07:36, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
MindSlayer13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
dumb snowman idiot dont undo when u dont have a brain..how can u mix east bengal fc with east pakistan Coderdaddy1369 (talk) 12:56, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Block extended. We do not tolerate personal attacks here. Yamla (talk) 13:08, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Johnny Acosta statistics in infobox
[edit]Well, I have explained it previously in edit summary and would like to explain once again. In infobox, only national league appearances are added. In case of Acosta or specifically East Bengal, the national league is I-League. CFL, Super Cup, Federation Cup etc are not national leagues and hence their statistics must not be added in infobox. RRD (talk) 18:09, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
September 2018
[edit] You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Willis Plaza. GiantSnowman 19:54, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GiantSnowman 16:14, 16 September 2018 (UTC)About Kolkata Derby
[edit]Hey there, I've noticed you are one of the very few people trying to keep the mentioned page free from vandals, I can only appreciate your efforts. I'd like to suggest that you should apply for a page protection request for the said page. And I'm ashamed of what's been going on there, for people don't understand the rivalry isn't defined by who won the first match or anything like that. Anyways, do consider my advice. Cheers, REALMMB(talk) 09:35, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
2018-19 I-League
[edit]Why did you revert my edit? There is no need for a separate map for the Kolkata clubs, there are only two of them. The positions by round needs to be referenced and are generally not allowed. See 2017–18 Premier League. Other things you reverted included me putting a score as 2–2 and instead having it as 2-2. The dash needs to be better. You also reverted the update to the attendance and flags shouldn't be saying the whole country but the abbreviation. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 19:51, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Coderdaddy1369. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Coderdaddy1369. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
December 2018
[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at I-League, you may be blocked from editing. Coderzombie (talk) 12:50, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
March 2019
[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Rasgulla, you may be blocked from editing. besides being a violation of NPOV, it's pretty much vandalism as the article makes it clear it's part of Odisha's cuisine. Doug Weller talk 15:21, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2019 Indian Super Cup.- Your edits and page moves are disruptive. Please listen to the advice people have been trying to give you. GiantSnowman 13:02, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 20
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cavin Lobo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ATK (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:42, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019%E2%80%9320_Indian_Super_League_season#Teams please fix the thing with pune - hyderabad city to be same on all pages 🙏 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.1.24.192 (talk) 15:07, 23 August 2019 (UTC) now please switch pune to hyderabad on isl page — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.142.149.103 (talk) 00:19, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 14
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jobby Justin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ATK (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:27, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
September 2019
[edit] Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Indian Super League, you may be blocked from editing. Coderzombie (talk) 11:00, 22 September 2019 (UTC) pls remove afc cup from isl as from today its cl only — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.142.132.61 (talk) 16:45, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
October 2019
[edit] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Regarding ISL and I-League
[edit]As per the AFC official release, its mentioned the Indian Super League (ISL) being recognised as the top league in India starting from this 2019-2020 season. So, both arent top leagues. What was previous year, doesnt matter, and this article isnt updated Football in India#League System. 
অর্ণব S a h a 13:22, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Coderdaddy1369: How 2 leagues can be on the same level? We are currently following Australian league structure.
অর্ণব S a h a 16:01, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
October 2019
[edit]Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
There is a talk page of the article, discuss there without doing edit wars. You both are on the verge of getting blocked. Dey subrata (talk) 16:34, 21 October 2019 (UTC) Please protect al wehda and al ittihad pages from vandal adding old logos — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.142.149.73 (talk) 20:40, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
please remove quess from east bengal name — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.137.9.220 (talk) 18:38, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
check i league 2nd div updates i suggested — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.1.20.142 (talk) 01:54, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 17
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Football League (India), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjab Police (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:55, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
updates
[edit]If can please update these:
- on east bengal page, add "f.c." or remove title to "fc" as two titles look different
- on persija jakarta, add "px" after logo size
THANKS 🙏🙏🙏 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.2.198.186 (talk) 03:22, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
ISL & I-League
[edit]On 14th October 2019, AFC has given the status of premier football league in India to the Indian Super League. It's correct that currently two parallel league system exists in India. But both leagues are not in the same level. Because ISL League Winners get the ACL spot and I-League winners get the AFC Cup spot. So ISL sits at the "Level 1" and I-League sits at the "Level 2". You are requested to see the "League System" portion in the Wikipedia of "Football In India". Then your confusion will be cleared about two leagues. Both leagues are top leagues but Premier League is only "Indian Super League". SAIKAT MARINERS DEY (talk) 16:11, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Confusion regarding parallel league system in India
[edit]I have no motive of any disruption. Please see the link - [1] After seeing this link your all confusion will be cleared. Both of ISL & I-League are top tier leagues because afc slots exist for both. But I-League is not Premier League now, Premier League is only Indian Super League beacuse afc slots for two leagues are not same. It's official. If you have not belief on me then see the link I have given above. SAIKAT MARINERS DEY (talk) 06:38, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
It isn't official, Yes in reality it is but I League will become 2nd tier only when ISL will have promotion and relegation, for the time being these leagues are diiferent and has no connection.
About parallel football leagues
[edit]Are you mad? Why are you acting as a fool? How can two leagues sit on the same level? Haven't you seen the official news related to parallel football leagues. You have ignored reference Google links also that I had given in the previous discussion. Please search in Google about the levels of ISL & I-League. AFC has clearly said that No. 1 league is Indian Super League. Do you think yourself as greater than AFC? Why don't you understand that AFC Champions League spot is only for ISL team, not for I-League team I again say that please see the links that I have again given below. [2] [3] SAIKAT MARINERS DEY (talk) 08:07, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
bagan page
[edit]Pls update position as "1st of 12 (champions)...!and for rest of i league if needed — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.143.113.142 (talk) 20:34, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
sportstar.thehindu.com/football/football-delhi-capital-cup-tournament-indian-super-league-i-league-indian-football-news-covid-19/article31703339.ece/amp/
www.outlookindia.com/newsscroll/amp/aiffs-inaugural-futsal-club-championship-to-kickstart-202021-season/1834117
these page would be useful to make
eb
[edit]pls remove quess from owner and text parts, they are out by 1st june. also website from "external links" is wrong, one on top side is enough. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.142.151.196 (talk) 13:49, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
isl
[edit]please remove sentence its top with i league as wont be from new season. if they ever merge (i league no money for patel), compromise is let top 2 in as now bagan (forget afc trick with atk) and eb who prepares to join. for now it is technically made 2nd level as no afc without isl. chennai city was last that way. Also remove i league from eb page as they wont play it for sure, since no more afc spot and were top 2 so going for isl. add it when done but no i league its confirmed.
last...add new atk-mb logo or move old on bagan page...or add one reverted from mb to new page if must make (still its best to update bagan page as they kept traditional identity as successors). also fix league position "1st of 11", ban those reverting then 🙏 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.142.144.196 (talk) 18:12, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
July 2020
[edit]
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → 
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks! RegentsPark (comment) 14:50, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
East Bengal F.C.
[edit]
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to East Bengal F.C., did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ❯❯❯ S A H A 19:01, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at East Bengal F.C.. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ❯❯❯ S A H A 19:13, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
- don't remove the ipa. as per MOS:IS, no language other than English shall be used in the Lead and infobox. also, with the "Indian football updater" template, the data will get updated automatically. the "The club is one of the most successful clubs of South Asia having won around 150 trophies. It is also the most successful Indian Club in International Competitions" this is already present in the lead. ❯❯❯ S A H A 19:18, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
July 2020
[edit] Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:ArnabSaha. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. ❯❯❯ S A H A 19:21, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on East Bengal F.C.; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ❯❯❯ S A H A 19:24, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The discussion is about the topic Coderdaddy1369 launching personal attacks. — Yours, Berrely • Talk∕Contribs 19:34, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. qedk (t 愛 c) 19:43, 25 July 2020 (UTC)https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/I-League
saha, guess he is blocked for adding i league to eb...so why i league page still has mb, even after i told (you) to remove earlier ?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.172.187.10 (talk) 20:15, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
- he is blocked for other reason. don't get confused ❯❯❯ S A H A 20:30, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
September 2020
[edit] You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at East Bengal F.C.. ❯❯❯ S A H A 08:09, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Mohun Bagan A.C., you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Please go through the article talk page. It was well discussed if it's new club or a football entity of MB. You must refrain from further such edit in the article. Any further unconstructive removal of sourced content from the article will lead to a permanent block or topic ban. You are already been blocked several times. You should have learnt the necessities by now or the guidelines and policies. Thank you. Drat8sub (talk) 08:00, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Continuation to October 2020
[edit]Can you please explain this edit when you are already been warned for similar edit? Drat8sub (talk) 13:56, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Last time you ignored the question asked to you for clarification. It seems you have ignored the warning also. I am giving you last chance so that you may clarify why are you pursuing addition of unsourced contents in wikipedia. Along with above edit, explain this edit. If you pursue the same editing behaviour, I am afraid you may loose all your editing privileges. Drat8sub (talk) 16:02, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
updates
[edit]i legue - media coverage:
...Separately, AIFF has commissioned Instat Limited...
...I-League for past two seasons was showcased on Star Sports...
these sentences beginning need a space! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.1.16.35 (talk) 10:32, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
ANI
[edit] There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Repeated unsourced edit and unresponsive regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Drat8sub (talk) 13:04, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
- Can you explain your unsourced edits at ANI? Drat8sub (talk) 13:34, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Request to create a new article for ATK Mohun Bagan FC
[edit]As we all know that ATK Mohun Bagan FC is a new club we need a new wikipedia page for it. BarcelonaFan995 (talk) 17:29, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello Mindslayer13, here i am listing all the sources that prove ATK Mohun Bagan FC is a new club and need a new article on wikipedia. 1.official merger announcement where it is clearly written that they will form a new club.
https://www.instagram.com/p/B7YWo5cpkcA/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link
2.About section of ATKMB's facebook page claiming it is a new club.
https://m.facebook.com/pg/atkmohunbaganfc/about/?ref=page_internal&mt_nav=0
3.Interviews of directors and co-owners claiming it is a new club.
https://www.facebook.com/DigitalMediaIdeas/videos/288622845552479/ https://www.facebook.com/DigitalMediaIdeas/videos/738400133657162/
4.Goal.com,world's largest online football publication's report on how ATKMB can still play in AFC CUP being a new club.
5.A reputed media house NEWS18's article on ATKMB have no previous records and have to start from the zero.
6.Transfermarkt.com a reputed football related website having a new page for ATKMB with no previous records claiming its a brand new club.they still have two separate pages one for Mohun Bagan and one for ATK FC.
https://www.transfermarkt.co.in/atk-mohun-bagan-fc/transfers/verein/83266
7.'Hero ISL Champions 2019-20' is embroided on the jersey and training kits of ATKMB.it proves that history of ATK is a integral part of ATKMB.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EkNiJcIX0AASZEu?format=jpg&name=large
8.In the official website of Hero ISL ATK FC has been rebranded as ATKMB FC.
https://www.indiansuperleague.com/standings
9.RPSG Group's website where both the logos of ATK FC and Mohun Bagan AC has been removed and replaced with the new logo of ATKMB.if ATKMB is a rebranded version of Mohun Bagan then the logo of ATK FC should have been there as they still have the logo of Rising Pune Supergiant,their IPL team that is currently dissolved.
https://www.rpsg.in/business/rpsgsports
10.And also the Office address of ATKMB is Topsia not Maidan.
ATKMB does not pick any bid paper they are still using the old bid paper of ATK.
when players like Roy,Prabir,Edu had signed for the club they termed it as 'extension' and when players like Sahil had signed for the club they termed it as 'new signing'.
When the club itself claiming that ATKMB is a new club,when the owners and directors are claiming that ATKMB is a new club,when both Indian and foreign media houses are claiming that its a new club why wikipedia still does not have a separate article on ATK Mohun Bagan FC?
It is my kind request to you that it is the right time to create a new article on ATK Mohun Bagan FC as Hero ISL is going to start in less than a month. BarcelonaFan995 (talk) 17:32, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello MindSlayer13,
Currently there is a ongoing discussion on Mohun Bagan AC's wiki talk page to create a new page for ATK Mohun Bagan FC.As you are a very experienced editor and you also took part in the last discussion on that page we need your valuable thoughts on this matter.My kind request to you to take part in the discussion and put your thoughts on this matter.
(BarcelonaFan995 (talk) 12:06, 27 October 2020 (UTC))
Sources
[edit]I'm wondering about this edit at Surchandra Singh. Why did you make that change? Are you aware that reliable sources are required? Perhaps you are aware that technically all that is required is that text is verifiable—that is, that reliable sources exist. However, editors who repeatedly make unsourced changes are disruptive since it requires too much effort from other editors to verify information. I noticed the report at the administrators' noticeboard where it is suggested that you should be blocked. Please respond indicating why you made the change at Surchandra Singh and how you will edit in the future. Johnuniq (talk) 00:21, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Johnuniq (talk) 02:51, 28 October 2020 (UTC)Johnuniq (talk) 02:51, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
This block is to prevent further disruption. I mentioned above that reliable sources are required and that it is unacceptable to repeatedly change articles without any source, particularly when other editors object. I asked you to explain a certain edit. You are entitled to ignore that request, but continuing to make challenged edits without any explanation is not acceptable. For example, your edit at 19 October 2020 was reverted but you repeat it at 27 October 2020, and have made no response here or at the noticeboard that I mentioned (also see #ANI above). Johnuniq (talk) 02:51, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- See ANI (permalink). Johnuniq (talk) 02:56, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
MindSlayer13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I don't think my edits were disruptive, and I usually overlook the notification bar, so couldn't respond. SorryMindSlayer13 (talk) 12:52, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you don't think your edits were disruptive, when clearly other people do, then you won't be unblocked. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 13:08, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Show me the edits which you think to be disruptive!! :) MindSlayer13 (talk) 10:13, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
MindSlayer13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
First of all I don't know for which edit I was blocked, then I scrolled a bit, and saw Johniq blocked me because I changed Surchandra Singh's club to East Bengal (the club he currently plays for) without giving a source. Yes I forgot to attach a source. The user then messaged me asking for the source, I really don't open the notify bar too often & so I overlooked it. Yes that's the mistake maybe?
Decline reason:
You don't seem very confident in your answer. 331dot (talk) 20:49, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
MindSlayer13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
First of all I don't know for which edit I was blocked, then I scrolled a bit, and saw Johniq blocked me because I changed Surchandra Singh's club to East Bengal (the club he currently plays for) without giving a source. Yes I forgot to attach a source. The user then messaged me asking for the source, I really don't open the notify bar too often & so I overlooked it. Yes that's the mistake, and I don't know what more I need to do. Please clarify
Decline reason:
Only one open unblock request at a time, please. SQLQuery me! 16:46, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
MindSlayer13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
And mr. John the edit regarding Scott Neville. I moved Scott Neville from Player 1 to AFC Player ( as he is an afc player.. Australian) I still don't know what explanation should I give for correcting mistakes. He is playing as an AFC player for East Bengal in the league. Please double verify before alleging someone.
Decline reason:
It boggles the mind that you still don't seem to realize why you were blocked. You seem to think, or pretend to seem to think, that you were blocked over one edit: you were not. You need to read over this discussion. I propose you get one more chance to make an unblock request, one which addresses the entirety of the problem as laid out at ANI; if you make one more hollow request, one that shows no awareness at all of why your edits were problematic, we should remove your access to this talk page.
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
MindSlayer13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Okay missed that part, Sorry I overlooked that one, not really an avid wiki user, so I just do some updates regarding some pages for which I have concern for. I accept my mistake for not seeing the notifications and failing to respond. Regarding my wiki name change from ShonRoy to my current name, it was an Spelling mistake in my name so needed to change it. Will be adding sources and will try to respond to user messages. Sorry and Thank You
Decline reason:
Enough is enough. One of the issues raised was your competence. You have failed to address this issue, and don't seem able to put together an unblock request despite me having fixed your previous request earlier today, therefore I am revoking your ability to edit this page. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 19:11, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
UTRS 37905
[edit]@Johnuniq and Voice of Clam: For your consideration, user is requesting unblock at UTRS appeal #37905. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:24, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
- Noted. I don't use UTRS (and it would be inappropriate for me to do so in this case anyway) so I will leave this to others to review. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 16:29, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
- Similarly, thanks for the notice but I would prefer to leave this for others and am happy with whatever is decided. Johnuniq (talk) 21:54, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
- Inclined to unblock. Any opposed? Please let me know. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:46, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- The block was imposed after discussion at ANI, therefore I feel it should only be lifted after a discussion is raised there or AN before unblocking. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 15:53, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- Inclined to unblock. Any opposed? Please let me know. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:46, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
@Voice of Clam: Thanks. Will maybe carry over eventually. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:26, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- Unblock request carried to WP:AN#Unblock request for MindSlayer13 --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:53, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
- Closing as declined per ST47 declaring check user confirmed socking/block evasion at the AN thread. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:06, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Talk page access
[edit]I've restored talk page access for you to allow you to make another unblock request on this page. I suggest you read all the above comments carefully before you do, and do not just copy down a previous declined request as you did before. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 18:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
- Actually, just reply here if someone at the AN thread has a question, feedback, or a concern. Best --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:37, 11 December 2020 (UTC)