User talk:Pointer1
 | This user may have left Wikipedia. Pointer1 has not edited Wikipedia since 12 November 2020. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
|
Washington Metro
[edit]FYI...the Washington Metro is a rapid transit system, not a newspaper, so it's ridership, not readership, in Barack Obama 2009 presidential inauguration.OCNative (talk) 12:59, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Endashes
[edit]Just to let you know, when it comes to football seasons, endashes (–) are preferred to slashes (/). Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 12:02, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Inauguration of Barack Obama
[edit] | This user helped promote Inauguration of Barack Obama to good article status. |
Thank you for the editorial assistance that you gave to help improve this article. Keep up the good work as we try to take this article to WP:FA.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 07:16, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello Pointer1. I've reverted you twice on the Celtic F.C. article because you keep inserting a protection template when the article isn't protected. Only administrators on the site have the ability to protect articles and the template only informs editors - it doesn't actually protect the article. If you wish to request a page to be protected, you can do at WP:RFPP. I'm an admin, and I would decline to protect it. Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 11:40, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Capital letters in headings
[edit]Hi, just to let you know that in section headings, the first word has a capital letter, but after that, words only have capitals if they're proper nouns. See WP:HEAD. E.g. it should be ==Playing career== and not ==Playing Career==. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 11:14, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Periods at end of sentences
[edit]Why are you removing periods from the end of sentences, such as in Sherry? Tomas e (talk) 12:01, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
Category sort keys
[edit]Hello. Re your edit to Category:Kidderminster Harriers F.C. in that club's article. The pipe character and space after the club category was actually correct; it makes the club page sort at the top of the list of pages in that category, rather than in alphabetical order. I've restored it. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 14:30, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Darts
[edit]You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Darts. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ Contribs. 04:00, 18 January 2010 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}})
Non-breaking spaces
[edit]The nbsp's you removed in this edit are required by the Wikipedia:Manual of Style. The nbsp symbol is explained at WP:NBSP, which says: "Use a non-breaking space (also known as a hard space) to prevent the end-of-line displacement of elements that would be awkward at the beginning of a new line: ... in other places where breaking across lines might be disruptive to the reader, such as £11 billion ..." Therefore, an nbsp is correct in phrases like "$1.4 million", which prints as "$1.4 million". WP:ELLIPSIS also requires an nbsp before an ellipsis (three dots) in most cases: it says "Use non-breaking spaces ... To keep the ellipsis from wrapping to the next line ("France, Germany, ... and Belgium but not the USSR")." So I'm putting the nbsp's back in again. Art LaPella (talk) 00:04, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Also, the commas that same edit removed after dates like "August 29, 2009" are also required by the Manual of Style. See the seventh bullet point of WP:COPYEDIT#Common edits. Same for the dashes you changed back to hyphens; see WP:HYPHEN, WP:DASH and MOS:QUOTE. I fixed those too. Art LaPella (talk) 00:34, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Stacey Slater
[edit]Thanks for your edits to Stacey Slater. They were mostly good and very much appreciated, but please don't remove full-stops (periods if you're American) from image captions. They are supposed to be there. Thanks. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 22:02, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Date formats
[edit]Hello. Thanks for tidying Olivier Tébily, but I've reverted your date format changes. Please have a look at the Manual of Style section on dates, WP:DATE, particularly the bolded part of the second paragraph, which will explain why. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 08:32, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Consistently amended as per WP:DATE Pointer1 (talk) 12:57, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- I see the wording has recently been amended, so the bolded part I pointed out isn't there any more :-) and you're quite right about consistency extending to within the references.
- However, consistency doesn't justify changing to a format not used in the article, as WP:DATE still makes clear, citing the ArbCom decision that "Wikipedia does not mandate styles in many different areas; these include (but are not limited to) American vs. British spelling, date formats, and citation style. Where Wikipedia does not mandate a specific style, editors should not attempt to convert Wikipedia to their own preferred style..." I won't revert again, because edit warring is just as unacceptable. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 13:21, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Rather than create a new section I'll add my comments here as they are about date formats as well.
I noticed you fixed the date format in the BBC News articles. The changes are as a result of a vandal who constantly reverts the date format. I have tried engaging them in conversation but they never reply. I've created a list of the articles that he has vandalised on a regular basis in the past here so if you fancy reverting some more News articles back to their proper format, please feast upon that list. - X201 (talk) 14:50, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Brown
[edit]Please stop reverting on Brown, you have been asked in edit summaries to move to discussion on the Talk:Gordon Brown talkpage, thanks Off2riorob (talk) 23:44, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi!
The "alt=" fields you keep removing from the Gordon Brown article are there for a reason - specifically so that the images are accessible visually impaired users. These fields were originally added to bring the article up to featured article status.
If you're unsure why you keep being reverted, it's always a good idea to check the history of an article. When editors revert (or make any edit) they tend to leave edit summaries explaining their edit - as I have several times when I've reverted you.
Cheers, TFOWRThis flag once was red 23:45, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
- For example "rv good faith edit - use captions for images, use alt text for screen-readers etc." from several hours ago. You'll see the edit summary when you click on "history" (obviously for this one you may need to scroll down through several hundred edits...) TFOWRThis flag once was red 23:52, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
- That was one example from earlier today; I've reverted you more recently than that - hence my message here. Every time I left an WP:Edit summary. TFOWRThis flag once was red 00:01, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
- ...but if you want more examples of you removing WP:ALT-text and subsequently being reverted, here goes:
- Admittedly, one of those was from a fellow editor. All, however, provided an WP:Edit summary. "Reversion does not equal explanation!" is correct; you were reverted with an explanation.
- TFOWRThis flag once was red 00:08, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Burki
[edit]Please add the following to Burki. It keeps on getting deleted when I add it by the automated system. thx
Extended content
|
|---|
|
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 2010khan (talk • contribs) 20:03, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
Juarez
[edit]We have a clear reliable citation tohat says this person has signed for Celtic, do you not accept the citation? Off2riorob (talk) 08:26, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Mexican player agrees to join Celtic
[edit]Is there some objection to the detail in this reliable citaton? Off2riorob (talk) 08:28, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/c/celtic/8820467.stm
"Celtic have completed the signing of Mexico right-back Efrain Juarez from UNAM Pumas for an undisclosed fee subject to a medical and work permit".
RE: Juarez
[edit]um no you get over it get a life —Preceding unsigned comment added by FGaribay (talk • contribs) 22:37, 23 July 2010 (UTC) haha me grow up!? kid get a life and stop reverting ppls edits before you get banned —Preceding unsigned comment added by FGaribay (talk • contribs) 22:19, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
I would like to invite both editors to observe Wikipedia:Avoid personal remarks. Indeed, Efraín Juárez is an excellent player now playing for Celtic coming from UNAM Pumas, but most importantly he's a rising star in the Mexican national team. Just like Chicharito, Barrera, and other Mexican youngsters are. Remember to keep a cool head and do not engage in edit warring. If there is a question, take it to the article's talk page and leave a comment on my talk page an I'll try to weight on the issue. Thank you. -- Marco Guzman, Jr Chat 23:08, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Tasmin Lucia Khan
[edit]Thank you for experimenting with the page Tasmin Lucia Khan on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. The references from both The Sun and the Daily Mail comply with WP:RS, and although reference to the photographs is not encyclopaedic, when both confirm her full name this is valid encyclopaedic information. Please stop trying to remove it. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 15:13, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tasmin Lucia Khan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Reverting WP:RS - which both The Sun and the Daily Mail constitutes destructive vandalism. There is a discussion open on the articles talk page Talk:Tasmin Lucia Khan which addresses the inclusion of the references. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 18:28, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
August 2010
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Eamonn Holmes, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Qwerta369 (talk) 09:30, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
WikiProject Darts invite
[edit]
|
You have been invited to join WikiProject Darts. We are dedicated to improving and expanding darts-related articles on Wikipedia. You received this invitation due to your interest in darts and/or your edits to Darts-related articles. If you would like to join, please click here, and add your name to the bottom of the list of project members. ~~~~ |
|
Mr.Kennedy1 talk 10:43, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 81.190.241.90 (talk) 15:45, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 81.190.241.90 (talk) 17:06, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Place of birth
[edit]Hi, locating the place of birth in the "Career" (or some such) section isn't ideal, but going by what WP:MOSNUM#Dates of birth and death says it's an improvement on it being in the lead as the parenthesis following the subject's name should only contain the date of birth/death. Do you think locating this detail in the "Personal life" section would be a better solution? Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 13:34, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Accessdates
[edit]Hello. Please don't remove accessdates from citations. They may not be strictly necessary in all cases, but removing them is pointless, and having them there makes it easier to retrieve an archived version if the page goes dead. Thanks, Struway2 (talk) 14:59, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Cite template parameters
[edit]Hello. Thanks for cleaning up references where necessary, but if you're going to correct other people's formatting, it's a good idea to make sure you're up-to-date with what's actually correct. Please note the Essential parameters section of {{Cite news}}, which says:
- newspaper: Name of the publication that ran the item, e.g., Newsweek, The Scotsman, etc. Can also be used for the name of a column or subpart of an issue. Do not italicize; the software will do so automatically. (You may also use journal, magazine, periodical or work, but do not use publisher for this.)
Also, I noticed in your edit to Nikola Žigić, you changed the publisher in ref#2 to Sport Agency ABPM. There's a banner ad for that company at the top of the cited page, but I can't find any indication on the reprezentacija.rs website of that company being their publisher? cheers, Struway2 (talk) 09:44, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Another bit of MoS you may have missed
[edit]is regarding citation style. WP:CITEHOW says that when adding citations to an article, "You should follow the style already established in an article if it has one; where there is disagreement, the style used by the first editor to use one should be respected." That means whether or not it's a style we personally prefer. Before you started editing Nigel Lawson, it consistently used the {{Cite web}} family of templates. You've changed it to use hand-coded citations. Now you're aware of this, please would you try to follow it. Also, you're wasting your time removing location=London from citations; they're mostly added by bot, so the bot will no doubt come back and put it back in.
Sorry if this is coming across as a bit of a lecture, but as I'm sure you're aware, changing things away from the recommended style just makes extra work for others. If there's anything else you're not sure of re the style guidelines, please feel free to ask. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 08:11, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
2010 Copiapó mining accident copy edit slavery!
[edit]
|
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | |
| In sincere appreciation for your hard work and patience fixing things, correcting sentence construction, |
Be careful when changing dates
[edit]{{ffdc}} requires a specific date format for its log parameter, and changing this format (as you did in this edit) breaks the link to the deletion discussion. Please check the template documentation for unfamiliar templates before changing their date parameters. Thanks. Anomie⚔ 14:30, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
The Saturdays
[edit]I reverted your edits to The Saturdays' article. Those charting positions are from the European Hot 100 and not the Billboard Hot 100. The former has nothing to do with the latter. They are two different charts that calculate Europe and America separately and respectively. Just to inform you. And I know you are a beginner of sorts, so I suggest you read the editing documentation before you make any big changes to any article. IHelpWhenICan (talk) 17:42, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
- He mailed me. Sorry, wrong person. IHelpWhenICan (talk) 19:28, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
She certainly used to be a news anchor according to this, though that was last updated in 2008 and things may have changed since then. If you've no objections to my doing so I think I'll call her a reporter and anchor just to cover all areas. Cheers. TheRetroGuy (talk) 12:47, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
That was impressive
[edit]You put that one firmly in the net. Excellent job! Nipsonanomhmata (talk) 20:52, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
|
The Special Barnstar | |
| On your excellent effort to improve the article about the footballer Giorgos Samaras. You're a star! Nipsonanomhmata (talk) 18:50, 25 January 2011 (UTC) |
Loans and infoboxes
[edit]Hi, it's standard WP:FOOTY procedure to note loans as "→ Club (loan)" in the infobox. I don't know why you keep removing the brackets and stating "it's already been marked" makes little sense. Thanks, --Jimbo[online] 02:13, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Reply
[edit]I would appreciate if you would revert the Article back to the one with consensus (along with the new evidence i have given on the discussion page) seeing as you have removed referenced material now twice going on four times. Monkeymanman (talk) 19:06, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
You are now edit warring. Please return the article to its original state and discuss the matter on the talk page. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 21:30, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
That Sunday Night Show
[edit]Hello, Pointer,
How are you? I just wanted to let you know that I reverted your edit to this show page as while I appreciate your edit and acknowledge that it was ok. I have seen other pages with episode guides and I have seen certain episode guides with a "list-type" guest listing and others with a "prose-type" guest listing. (with "and" and without). There have been no conflicts about whether or not to use the "and". All the other edits were constructive, but I would appreciate you not reverting this particular edit, as there was never really anything wrong with it in the first place. It wasn't rally doing any harm to the page. You can add the "and" when writing an episode guide. List and prose are acceptable in this instance. So, please do not revert it again. Thanks. 65.92.23.10 (talk)samusek2 —Preceding undated comment added 14:22, 24 February 2011 (UTC).
Thank you
[edit]For the edit summaries, they really help. Alistair Stevenson (talk) 19:43, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
User Fark Hello plese stop vandalism page libian ciwil war 2011 please stop 94.236.142.40 (talk) 21:51, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Clayton Donaldson
[edit]I don't want to start an edit war so I'll raise my issues here. Firstly, the title of the Crewe reference on the webpage itself reads "First Team"; nowhere on that link does it state "First Team - Clayton Donaldson". Secondly, why is "FC" preferable to "F.C."? Using the latter is consistent with how club articles are titled. Also, the name of The Press is The Press, not York Press. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 03:23, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- FYI I've started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Clayton Donaldson about it. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 15:16, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
Celtic F.C. task force
[edit]Hello Pointer1, as you edit a lot of Celtic-related articles it may interest you to join the Celtic F.C. task force so we can try and improve the coverage of Celtic on Wikipedia. If not that is fine, but keep up your great work anyway. Thanks. Adam4267 (talk) 20:15, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Fixing redirects
[edit]Hello. You might save yourself some work by not "fixing" working redirects. As WP:NOTBROKEN explains, it's both unnecessary and discouraged. Though if you're going to do it, please check you're getting the target right. At Jake Jervis, you replaced the redirect Bradford City with the redirect [[Bradford City F.C.|Bradford City]]; it's actually Bradford City A.F.C. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 09:21, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Craig Beattie, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages David James and Liberty Stadium (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:05, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
Piping on dabs
[edit]Hello. I've been noticing you have been cleaning up some disambiguation page recently. You have been doing some good work but in some cases have been removing instances of valid piping. While piping is generally discouraged on disambiguation pages it is also important to note that there are cases where it should be used, for instance here: [1] for the title of the comic book and the video game. Piping is used in these situations, when the entry's article title differs from how it should actually be rendered, as a result of the technical limitations of the system. Have a look at WP:Piping#Where piping may be appropriate which gives examples of some of these instances. When in doubt, I always find it useful to have a look at WP:ITALIC, and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Text formatting#When not to use italics, as dabs follow the same formatting conventions for titles that articles do. All the best, France3470 (talk) 23:37, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Be Warned - Rangers FC - an attempt to push through a controversial 'same club' approach
[edit]Hello. You have contributed to the Newco Rangers article so I thought yuou should be made aware that an attempt is being made to undermine this article by pushing through a 'same club' approach despite many of us believing this is heavily biased and very selective use of the sources. You may wish to follow what is proposed at the Talk:Rangers F.C/Sandbox. Spiritofstgeorge (talk) 12:50, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
Deletion proposal: Controversy and criticism of The X Factor
[edit]Hi. An article you have contributed to, Controversy and criticism of The X Factor, is currently being discussed by the community as to whether it should be deleted. You can view and discuss this proposal at the article's AfD page. Thank you.--SUFC Boy 16:48, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 28
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ian Robertson (rugby commentator), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andy Irvine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
This Week (BBC News TV series) listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect This Week (BBC News TV series). Since you had some involvement with the This Week (BBC News TV series) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 06:19, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Pointer1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Edit summaries, please
[edit]Hello, and thanks for you contributions. Please remember that edit summaries save time for your colleagues. Eric talk 01:22, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Changing citation style, re Curtis Davies
[edit]Hello, and thank you for your improvements to Curtis Davies. I'm afraid I've undone your changes to the formatting, and have come to explain why. Over time, a consensus has developed at that article as to how to format citations, including: using the more explicit aliases |newspaper= and |website= rather than the generic |work=; using |newspaper= for newspaper websites as well as for paper sources; including |location= for newspapers where it's not obvious from the title (bots add that anyway, so there's little point removing it); and using |first= and |last= (displaying as Surname, Given name) rather than |author=Given name Surname. The relevant bit of the Manual of Style, at Wikipedia:Citing sources#Variations in citation methods, says quite strongly that where consensus has developed at a particular article to use a certain citation style, we should go along with that, and seek agreement at the article's talk page before attempting to change to a different style. So next time you make improvements to this page, or any other where there is an established and internally consistent citation style, please try to follow it. Thanks, Struway2 (talk) 11:26, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |