User talk:SMBMovieFan/Archive 1

October 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Trend (disambiguation) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Trend (disambiguation) was changed by SMBMovieFan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.885241 on 2022-10-06T23:39:00+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:39, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Samsung Galaxy S8, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. WindTempos ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:30, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WWE action figures. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. VickKiang (talk) 02:20, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

i had to revert it as i did not put the Keep comment. SMBMovieFan (talk) 02:21, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

So yeah sorry for removing your comment but i had to because the vote i didnt do SMBMovieFan (talk) 02:22, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Many thanks for your reply! To clarify, what does it mean by that you didn't do the vote? Here, you voted keep but soon changed. Does this imply WP:SHAREDACCOUNT (someone else is using your account)? VickKiang (talk) 02:25, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Yes, the Computer i use to edit Wikipedia is shared. Sorry if i removed your comment without telling you tho. SMBMovieFan (talk) 02:27, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 23:09, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Itaewon Halloween crowd crush, you may be blocked from editing. I'm striking this warning as it is NOT disruptive editing. I literally edited the page 1 time yet i got a "disruptive editing warning" when the warning is false! SMBMovieFan (talk) 12:55, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Huh? I'm not engaged in a edit war, i only edited once on the Itaewon Halloween Crowd Crush. SMBMovieFan (talk) 02:09, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SMBM (October 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SMBM and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:24, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello, SMBMovieFan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:24, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

hey the oringial 1993 movie is mostly referred has Super Mario Bros movie, but that is also conflicted with the new 2023 movie. I could remove the 1986 flim if you want. SMBMovieFan (talk) 14:27, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SMBM has been accepted

SMBM, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Redirect-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:07, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: WWE 2K Creation Community (October 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:WWE 2K Creation Community and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:36, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Samsung Galaxy S moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Samsung Galaxy S, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:19, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Samsung Galaxy S has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Samsung Galaxy S. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:19, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Redirects & Page moves

Hello, SMBMovieFan,

Please be careful and do not go overboard with creating redirects. I've seen some new editors get addicted to creating dozens and dozens of redirects and if done recklessly, it can lead to a loss of editing privileges. You never know when something like this will happen....look at this page, 67 Samsung-related broken redirects. I think this happened as a result of your article move of Samsung Galaxy S to Samsung Galaxy S (2010 smartphone) and then that page's move to Draft space. Please be careful when moving an article that has existed for over 10 years because there might be 67 valid redirects pointing to it that will be broken and could be deleted.

I know you are not responsible for all of these redirects but looking at your Contributions, it does seem like you are creating quite a few so just take things slowly. If you find yourself creating dozens and dozens of redirects a week, you're on your way to trouble and you can ask for guidance from me or a senior editor or admin or just visit the Teahouse which is always a friendly place to go to when you have questions. Thank you for your contributions on the project! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:39, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Blank

I'm interested in that why did you blank my comment from here? VickKiang (talk) 02:18, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

I did not vote for keep and i think someone did that. I did revisioned the AfD page. SMBMovieFan (talk) 02:18, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Samsung Galaxy S8 Keyboard Cover for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samsung Galaxy S8 Keyboard Cover is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samsung Galaxy S8 Keyboard Cover until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Waddles 🗩 🖉 02:28, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, SMBMovieFan! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Writing an article
• Five pillars of Wikipedia
• Community portal
• Help pages
• The Teahouse (newcomer help)
• Main help desk

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! VickKiang (talk) 04:22, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Samsung Galaxy S8, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Accessory. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Wikilinks

Hello SMBMovieFan!

When editing articles, make sure that any wikilinks you add to the article are relevant, and haven't already been linked. May i direct you to MOS:OVERLINK and MOS:REPEATLINK.

Otherwise your article may end up reading Like this. Which makes it harder for readers to understand, and disguises other, more important terms.

Best of luck! EmilySarah99 (talk) 09:49, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Hey thanks so much! SMBMovieFan (talk) 12:31, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Midnight Green picture change

Hello! I am wondering why you changed the picture for Midnight Green at Shades_of_cyan. You gave no edit summary, and the picture you added is, to my eyes, a much less useful example of the color: the phone picture is of quite poor quality, and (again, to my eyes) looks much more like gray than midnight green. The article mentions the use of this color by the Philadelphia Eagles, and the previous picture illustrated that well. Just wondering what your motivation was here. Please let me know when you have a moment. Cheers! DoctorMatt (talk) 21:41, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

The iPhone 11 Pro is the best example of "Midnight Green" i could be wrong, but when you google the color the iPhone 11 Pro's color comes first. Yes, the picture could be replaced with a higher quality one, but that is the one i found best on Wikimedia Commons. Feel free to disagree why i replaced the image tho. SMBMovieFan (talk) 22:53, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

I don't think I follow your argument here. The color shown in this phone picture is not midnight green as described in the article (you can check this in GIMP, etc.: the phone coloring is much more of a gray, with strong red components that the midnight green defined in the article does not have). You have not said why you replaced the picture. The previous picture actually showed the color well, and the subject is specifically referenced in the article (Philadelphia Eagles uniform color). Would you mind if I revert your edit? Thanks! DoctorMatt (talk) 23:36, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Perfectly fine to revert my edit and i understand your agrument. I just added the iPhone image as it is much more notable. SMBMovieFan (talk) 23:39, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Okay, thanks, I will revert it. Cheers! DoctorMatt (talk) 00:59, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from iPhone 6 into Bendgate. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:41, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Sorry. I did not know this, but i will apply the template to the talk page. SMBMovieFan (talk) 22:52, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tomb of the Mask (October 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tomb of the Mask and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 21:15, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tomb of the Mask has been accepted

Tomb of the Mask, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 22:29, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Tomb of the Mask

Hello, SMBMovieFan,

Thank you for creating Tomb of the Mask.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for the article! It meets notability guidelines and I've marked it as reviewed. However, the article is an orphan, make sure that other articles link to here. Also, the usage of you multiple times is inappropriate. Per the Manual of Style, MOS:YOU, Avoid addressing the reader using you or your, which sets an inappropriate tone, so I've tagged changing the tone of the article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|VickKiang}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

VickKiang (talk) 22:52, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks! I appreciate it. I addressed the Orphan issue. I will also be changing the tone of the article.SMBMovieFan (talk) 23:00, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: WWE 2K Creation Suite (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OceanHok was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:WWE 2K Creation Suite and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

OceanHok (talk) 18:39, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Aew and Raw

Aew and Raw are disambiguation pages. is not typically used on these pages. Please see MOS:DAB if you would like to learn more. Leschnei (talk) 13:54, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of KineMaster

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on KineMaster, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:09, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Removing Talk Discussion

While the CSD G11 was declined, IMO this removal doesn't seem to fall within WP:TPO, so I undid the revision. Though, if WaddlesJP13 agree for their message to be removed please revert my edit. Many thanks! VickKiang (talk) 02:03, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Xi Jinping reversion loop

I noticed looking through the Xi Jinping edit history that, after my last edit was reverted, you undid the reversion; you then proceeded to redo it. What's going on with that? Can we work on deciding whether that edit should actually be reverted? Amyipdev (talk) 22:54, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Wait nevermind, I think I got confused with something else. Please disregard. Amyipdev (talk) 22:56, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Restoring talk page threads

I've undone this edit which restored some bot archived threads to the page. I'm at a loss to understand why you did this. Both issues are completely stale. The first is notification of a requested move which was closed months ago and the other is a notification of an even that likewise happened months ago. If you've got nothing to add to a conversation then unarchiving is pointless. Also, if you are going to unarchive conversations, you need to do it properly and remove it from the archive at the same time. Creating duplicates of the same conversation is not helpful, especially if they end up diverging. SpinningSpark 14:38, 1 November 2022 (UTC)