User talk:Solavirum/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

January 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. E.g. spurious template dropping. - LouisAragon (talk) 21:07, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Oyuncu Aykhan Answer

I Used That Flag Because It Is Used On Azwiki and If You Google This Image 96% Results Are Related To "Atabegs Of Azerbaijan". Many Approved History Books Can Be My Source. Oyuncu Aykhan (talk) 14:20, 23 January 2017 (UTC) LouisAragon (talk)

June 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, as you did at Talk:Shahab al-Din Yahya ibn Habash Suhrawardi. Wario-Man (talk) 15:29, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Wario-Man what? What happened? What have I done? I didn'y edited that page. I just edited the talk page. I didn't wrote anything inappropriate. Oyuncu Aykhan (talk) 09:50, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about California Azerbaijan Friendship Association

Hello, Oyuncu Aykhan,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether California Azerbaijan Friendship Association should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/California Azerbaijan Friendship Association .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Winged Blades^Godric 10:19, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

May 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Shahin Dezh, you may be blocked from editing. - LouisAragon (talk) 17:10, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Dear LouisAragon, I understand being bit anti-Azerbaijan, but reverting correct edits is just absurd. Seriously, why add the Turkish name of Qizilbash, while the have nothing to do with Turkey? With this logic we should add Russian names of the Serbian Army Branches. Also, Şā’īn Qal‘eh's popular name among Iranian Azerbaijanis (the biggest ethnic group in the city) is Sayingala. Please take a second look before reverting my edits. Peace! --► Hörmətlə: A¥×aᚢ Zaÿïþzaþ€ ⚔ (hail sithis!) 12:25, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

Thanks to you I've learned how to link to articles in other languages. Gdrt94 (talk) 01:51, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Gdrt94, glad to see an another Azerbaijani here :) --► Hörmətlə: A¥×aᚢ Zaÿïþzaþ€ ⚔ (hail sithis!) 03:21, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

No personal attacks

I would ask you to strike through your comment, "Iranian nationalist Shia (which is pagan at this point) who shouts "Ya Hossein", instead of "Allahu Akbar"."

Labeling another editor then calling what you have labeled as "pagan" is clearly a personal attack. --Kansas Bear (talk) 19:16, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Aykhan Zayedzadeh. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. 188.158.105.139 (talk) 18:42, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Suppressed edits

Hi, Aykhan Zayedzadeh, you'll likely not be pleased about this but I have suppressed a number of edits to your userspace which reveal too much personally identifiable information about yourself. I've done this per policy and for your own protection and safety on-line as you are a self-declared minor. I'm really sorry about that and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add it. For some useful information on privacy and safety, take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages. -- Thryduulf (talk) 20:08, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

I've left a message on your az.wiki talk page, but leaving it here so I can give you a direct link :) Please visit Special:EmailUser/Mardetanha and send them a message. He's a very nice steward who needs to talk to you. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:04, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Edit war

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:05, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Wikaviani, my apologies. The IP then went to administrators' noticeboard to report me, but he was proven wrong. A¥×aᚢ ⚔ Zaÿïþzaþ€ 19:27, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:25, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

You need to use the talk page and get consensus first. I have protected the article in question for 72 hours and restored the prior version. If you make the change again without consensus on the talk page you may lose your ability to edit. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:00, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Rally in support of political prisoners has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rally in support of political prisoners. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:55, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Chima Rok moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chima Rok, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:34, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chima Rok (February 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chima Rok and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chima Rok, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chetsford (talk) 07:55, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Aykhan Zayedzadeh! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chetsford (talk) 07:55, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

AA2 advisory

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

- LouisAragon (talk) 09:47, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Persistent usage of personal attacks

• "There are lot of Persian users interrupting the factuality (...)" -- 19 February 2019[1]
• "Wikiviani, and you sound like an Iranian nationalist Shia (which is pagan at this point) who shouts "Ya Hossein", instead of "Allahu Akbar" -- 28 October 2018[2]
• "LouisAragon, I understand being bit anti-Azerbaijan (...)" -- 23 May 2018[3]

You were warned once before as well.[4] Please refrain from making such remarks in the future, as it violates Wikipedia's core policies. Thanks, - LouisAragon (talk) 09:58, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Omlet Arcade

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Omlet Arcade requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://venturebeat.com/2014/03/28/these-stanford-team-is-reinventing-the-entire-internet-for-just-10m/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cabayi (talk) 21:58, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Even if you did some editing of the material, it was clearly plagiarised from the VentureBeat source. You need to summarize the material in your own words. See also our guideline on Close paraphrasing to see how many things are not acceptable. —Kusma (t·c) 11:01, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Cabayi, Kusma, I tried to rephrase it as much as I can. I also added some additional information. Is this okay? Also, isn't deleting the whole article bit too much? There were information that wasn't taken from VentureBeat's article. --► Sincerely: A¥×aᚢ Zaÿïþzaþ€ ⚔ (hail sithis!) 19:29, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

It is still clearly derived from the copyrighted material, and any version of the article that contains plagiarised material needs to be deleted. Read the links we gave you above for some more background. —Kusma (t·c) 21:26, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Omlet Arcade screenshot.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Omlet Arcade screenshot.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Omlet Arcade screenshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chima Rok (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chima Rok and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chima Rok, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:16, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chima Rok (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StraussInTheHouse was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chima Rok and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chima Rok, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SITH (talk) 20:04, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Link building. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 20:44, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Selam

Its about one of your edits [5]. You made a change based on Urban Dictionary (not a reliable source) when the sourced material made no such mention. The term "Remove Kebab" emerged during the Yugoslav wars and ever since it is aimed at Muslims in general, not just Turks. So so your aware Serbs in their language also during the war referred to Bosniaks as "Turci" i.e Turks a word that has ranged from innocent connotations in past times signifying just Muslims to deeply pejorative meanings during the war resulting in violence. Read up before making changes especially on articles like that where the eyes of the world are on it at the moment. Best.Resnjari (talk) 21:15, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Dear Resnjari, I know that Urban Dictionary is not a reliable source, but is a generally known fact that "Remove Kebab" is used against Turks, as well as Bosniaks and Albanians. I've never seen someone say "Remove Kebab" to a Pakistani, Indonesian or Moroccan. --► Sincerely: A¥×aᚢ ⚔ Zaÿïþzaþ€ 09:43, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rally in support of political prisoners (April 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rally in support of political prisoners and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rally in support of political prisoners, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clarityfiend (talk) 08:43, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Azerbaijan, you may be blocked from editing. When are you going to understand that English Wiki is not a blog where you can add your POV without citing reliable sources ? Please do not do that again. ---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:01, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Wikaviani, avoid qualifying others' edits as "disruptive", be more objectionable. Also, your point is acceptable, but please consider not removing the correct parts when you disagree with the 10% of the actual edit. Also, "English Wiki is not a blog where you can add your POV without citing reliable sources ?", when did I do that? Btw, when did we had to add citations to that particular section of the infobox? --► Sincerely: A¥×aᚢ ⚔ Zaÿïþzaþ€ 15:09, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

When an edit is disruptive, there is nothing wrong to call it disruptive. Also, you've been reverted by another editor who shares my concerns. The problem was not only Caucasian Albania, the Khanates you were trying to link to Azerbaijan were also irreevant. You're trying to claim that Azerbaijani history is okder than 500 years, which is wrong and disruptive for the project, do not do that again without providing reliable sources please. As i said, i believe that you are able to do a better job than adding such nonesenses to Azerbaijani-related articles. Regards.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:59, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Keshikchidagh Temple) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Keshikchidagh Temple.

User:Rosguill while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Not currently mentioned in the target,

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:36, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

@Rosguill: reverted vandalism based on nationalistic desires. Now it is mentioned. The church/monastery is a disputed object, must include both names per neutral POV. --► Sincerely: A¥×aᚢ ⚔ Zaÿïþzaþ€ 20:02, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

List of archives in Azerbaijan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of archives in Azerbaijan consisted entirely of a list of red-linked articles. "List of foo"-articles are meant as a navigational aid to our readers, an aid that supplements categories. A list article without any blue-linked articles serves no purpose. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When at least three of the entries on the list have been created in main space, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Sam Sailor 16:23, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Historiography of Azerbaijan

A tag has been placed on Category:Historiography of Azerbaijan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:12, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Omlet Arcade (July 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mjs1991 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Omlet Arcade and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Omlet Arcade, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mjs1991 (talk) 09:13, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. - LouisAragon (talk) 18:09, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

--► Sincerely: '''[[User:Aykhan Zayedzadeh|<font face="Trebuchet MS" color="black">A¥×aᚢ</font>]] ⚔ [[User talk:Aykhan Zayedzadeh|<font face="Tempus Sans ITC" color="#560605">Zaÿïþzaþ€</font>]]''' : --► Sincerely: A¥×aᚢ ⚔ Zaÿïþzaþ€

to

--► Sincerely: '''[[User:Aykhan Zayedzadeh|<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS; color:black">A¥×aᚢ</span>]] ⚔ [[User talk:Aykhan Zayedzadeh|<span style="font-family:Tempus Sans ITC; color:#560605">Zaÿïþzaþ€</span>]]''' : --► Sincerely: A¥×aᚢ ⚔ Zaÿïþzaþ€

—Anomalocaris (talk) 20:38, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for updating your signature! —Anomalocaris (talk) 15:54, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Free pictures for commons

Hello Aykhan. Can you help to find some free pictures of Talysh Khanate's Mir Mustafa Khan and Mir Hassan Khan? Benyamin-ln (talk) 10:17, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello dear @Benyamin-ln:, sorry for late response. My colleague @Turkmen: is more informed about History of Azerbaijan and probably has more sources than me. Better to talk to him :D --► Sincerely: A¥×aᚢ ⚔ Zaÿïþzaþ€ 16:06, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Goychay

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Goychay you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kges1901 -- Kges1901 (talk) 00:21, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Goychay

The article Battle of Goychay you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Battle of Goychay for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kges1901 -- Kges1901 (talk) 00:21, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Goychay

The article Battle of Goychay you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Battle of Goychay for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 (talk) 20:02, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Chima Rok

Hello, Solavirum. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chima Rok".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 23:31, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:List of archives in Azerbaijan concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of archives in Azerbaijan, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of archives in Azerbaijan

Hello, Solavirum. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of archives in Azerbaijan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 11:01, 6 December 2019 (UTC)