User talk:TakisA1

Welcome!

Hello, TakisA1, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Olympia Anastasopoulou, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Boleyn (talk) 20:43, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Olympia Anastasopoulou

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Olympia Anastasopoulou, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Boleyn (talk) 20:43, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Emblempalaiofaliro.png

Thanks for uploading File:Emblempalaiofaliro.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:45, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Emblempalaiofaliro.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Emblempalaiofaliro.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:16, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ios (island), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EET (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Flag of Aegina

The article Flag of Aegina has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Insufficient WP:NOTABILITY; the article simply describes the flag (and incorrectly at that) without any indication that this is a notable subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Constantine ✍ 13:22, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Emblempalaiofaliro.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Emblempalaiofaliro.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:52, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hi! Good job with the flags Only take care to be reliable and existing ,and not fictional RegardsGreco22 (talk) 23:56, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Articles and sources

Hi there! Good job on starting articles, however a few remarks. Please read through and familiarize yourself with WP:OR, WP:RS and WP:REFERENCE. Use only reliable sources for your articles, not "local inhabitants", or "measured from Google Maps" or websites with the base url but no specific data other than that. Also, I strongly suggest you have a look at some of the better-quality pages in Wikipedia (you can start at WP:FA and WP:GA) to see how a proper article can be written. Remember, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, hence it needs to contain only notable, verifiable information that you would find in any encyclopedia, and should be written in a professional and neutral tone; it is not a tourist guide intended to entice readers to visit a place. Constantine ✍ 08:41, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Achlades Peninsula

The article Achlades Peninsula has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of WP:NOTABILITY; just an ordinary geographical feature

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Constantine ✍ 19:04, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Flags etc.

You seem to put a lot of work into adding emblems and flags for Greek municipalities etc., which is fine. There are, however, some issues concerning your additions.

One of the basic principles of Wikipedia is verifiability, which you can read about here. It means that when you add information to Wikipedia, it is necessary to give other editors the possibility of verifying that the information is correct. It is not enough that you think or even that you know your information is correct. You need to present sources that support the information. When you upload a flag or similar to Commons and present it as "Official flag of ..." or similar, you need to give sources that show not only that the flag exists, but also that it is official. As an example, you have not given any source for the flag of Nafplio. When I go to the web site of the Municipality of Nafplio, I find an emblem at the top of the page, but I can nowhere find the flag. The flag can very well be correct, but as long as there is no source even showing that the flag is in use, far less that it is official, it is not verifiable and should be removed.

Another example: The flag of Mykonos is not sourced. In the web site for Mykonos, there actually is a description of the emblem of the municipality (Σύμβολα του Δήμου) here. The emblem is used throughout the web site, not with the red colour of your file, but mostly in negative on different-coloured backgrounds. There is, however, no mention of a flag. Unless you can give a source for the flag, it is not verifiable and should be removed.

Even when there are sources for seals, emblems or flags, it is important that they are presented correctly. In the case of the flag of Syros-Ermoupoli, you have given a source. The illustration in that source indicates that there exists an official, formal and exact description of this flag. Comparing your uploaded version with the version given in the source, there are some obvious discrepancies, like the placement of the central circle, the size of the text and the choice of font. Even if your version looks somewhat similar, it is not correct and should be removed. The same type of problem has already been mentioned about the flag of Athens, where the colour was conspicuously wrong. Even if the new version you have uploaded looks better, I am still not convinced that it is completely correct.

So please:

Do not upload any more of your own versions of emblems and flags to Commons unless you are completely sure that they are correct, and do not call them official unless you are completely sure they are official. It would be helpful if you would go through your uploaded files in Commons and remove all mentions of "official" unless you can present sources to show they are official. If you do not do it, other people will have to spend time cleaning up.
Do not present any emblem, seal or flag in any article unless the file is properly sourced in Commons. It would be helpful if you would go through the articles you have edited and remove all files you have added that does not have proper sourcing in Commons. If you do not do it, other people will have to spend time cleaning up. --T*U (talk) 10:16, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I removed the "Official" and gave at least one source for all of my files.

Fine, that is a good start. I just noticed that you did not remove the word "Official" from the "Emblem of Patra". The source has an illustration that indicates that an official seal exists. It is similar to yours, but not identical. For one thing, the placement of the text is different. By the way, the new file you uploaded for "Seal of Sparta" has excellent sourcing! --T*U (talk) 19:31, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed that too. Thanks!

Nomination of Olympia Anastasopoulou for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Olympia Anastasopoulou is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olympia Anastasopoulou until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --T*U (talk) 07:53, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greece location map

Hi, you said here [1] that there was something wrong about the borders in the location map File:Athos in Greece.svg. Could you be a bit more specific? Maybe I'm missing some detail, but it's not obvious to me what's wrong about it. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:08, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for contacting me. The mistake with the map is on the border. You can see the correct border in the link below. The problem is that in the image

the border is more east than it should.

Correct border:

https://www.google.gr/maps/place/Mount+Athos/@40.2895803,23.9295459,10z/data=!4m5!3m4!1s0x14af3505d1d88cf3:0x7cdbcab532ff9281!8m2!3d40.2644928!4d24.2152731

Agia Theodoti, Milopotas

Hi TakisA!, Good day. Your creation of Agia Theodoti and Milopotas articles are cited with only "homepage of web page. Could you pls recite them in specific web pages pls for ease to review. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 20:29, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Yes of course. Thank you[reply]

Athens

Hi. How sure are you that the seal you put in Athens with this edit is more accurate? I ask because it has the motto/title in English, whereas the previous one was in Greek; i imagine the latter is more accurate. Happy days, Lindsay^Hello 18:58, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spyridon Valetas moved to Draft:Spyridon Valetas

Hi , Greetings. Pls note that your creation of Spyridon Valetas has been moved to Draft:Spyridon Valetas. Content added/edited in Wikipedia needs "inline citation" from independent (third party / secondary / tertiary) reliable source (in any language) for verification to gauge the nobility criteria is met. The articles's inline citation is the WP:BURDEN which it is on the person adding the information. Please note official website, records of sport events or individual player records are consider primary source and not independent source, and social network source such as facebook, twitter, instagram, imbd and etc are considered NOT reliable source and can not be used for citing. Independent reliable source are sources are those obtain from major newspaper, such as The Guardian, Sydney Morning Herald, CNN news and etc. or source obtain from major publisher of the work (for example, Random House or Cambridge University Press). Pls see

reliable source - see WP:RS
primary vs secondary vs tiartiary source - see WP:WPNOTRS
verification - see WP:V
notability - see WP:N
webcite - see WP:CITEWEB and its template -see Template: cite web

Once you have provided inline citations, kindly ping me at my talk page or at your talk page by typing <nowi> @CASSIOPEIA: </nowiki>for me to review the page. For more editing help, you could send your question to the friendly and helpful volunteers at the Teahouse. Lastly, I strongly encourage you to visit WP:The Wikipedia Adventure for there are some short and fun exercises on neutrality, verifiability, collaboration, research and sourcing. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:17, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@CASSIOPEIA: Thank you. I think I added enough sources now (TakisA1 (talk) 14:04, 24 March 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Hi TaksiA1, Thank your for providing the source. Please go to my talk page as I have replied you and there are some notes you might need to know. Thank you for the contribution. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 02:37, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you. I will read them all(TakisA1 (talk) 14:08, 25 March 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Milopotas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EET (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ιωνίδειος σχολή

Hello, TakisA1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ιωνίδειος σχολή".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 09:26, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Krithiida for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Krithiida is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krithiida until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:59, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Emblempalaiofaliro.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Emblempalaiofaliro.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Region Ionian Islands logo

Hello. I recently saw that you upload the logo of Corfu. Perhaps this logo will change next year as the municipality will split in more than 2 pieces. (Municipalities of South, Central and North Corfu + Diapontia Islands). Can you make also the logo of the region of Ionian Islands? Thank you! A. Katechis Mpourtoulis (talk) 09:50, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The logo of Ionian islands is probably copyrighted and should be uploaded a fair use image. While the "logo"of Corfu is not actually a logo but just a statue outside the Town Hall that I took a picture that is used as an emblem. (TakisA1 (talk) 10:17, 22 July 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Flag of Othoni and Diapontia Islands

Hello again. In the book called IONION AKRON there are 2 pictures showing the Greek flag with Othoni island on it in green color. It seems to be used by Othonians in the last century. There is also a flag which is called "Diapontia Islands flag" and its similar to Corfu flag. How can I send you a copy of these pages in order to upload those 2 flags? Thank you!!! A. Katechis Mpourtoulis (talk) 09:55, 22 July 2018 (UTC) There is a website called imgur where you can upload the pictures without an account and it will generate a link. Upload them there (NOT here since they might be copyrighted) and send me the link. I will designs the flags in vector and upload them. Please provide me information about Ano Panta and Kato Panta. What are they? There are official borders? (TakisA1 (talk) 10:08, 22 July 2018 (UTC))[reply]

There are no official borders of Ano and Kato Panta. They are unofficial regions. It's like separate Corfu into North and South. A. Katechis Mpourtoulis (talk) 10:11, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here is where you should upload the images [2] (TakisA1 (talk) 10:14, 22 July 2018 (UTC))[reply]

https://imgur.com/f0OMCAm — Preceding unsigned comment added by A. Katechis Mpourtoulis (talk • contribs) 11:00, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please send a picture of the book's page where it talks about the flag (TakisA1 (talk) 11:02, 22 July 2018 (UTC))[reply]

https://imgur.com/a/0VMtpDP — Preceding unsigned comment added by A. Katechis Mpourtoulis (talk • contribs) 11:03, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please send proper sources like pictures of the pages of this book (TakisA1 (talk) 11:07, 22 July 2018 (UTC))[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, TakisA1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Greek versions of names for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Greek versions of names is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Greek versions of names until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pontificalibus 09:30, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of long place names, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greek (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:35, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dimitrios Zamanos moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dimitrios Zamanos, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. b uidhe 19:17, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dimitrios Zamanos

Hello, TakisA1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dimitrios Zamanos, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:08, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Country data Nafplio

Template:Country data Nafplio has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 21:10, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Milos Island(en version).svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Milos Island(en version).svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:EMBLEM OF SAMOS.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EMBLEM OF SAMOS.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]