Jump to content

User talk:Prarambh20

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Tojoroy20)

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Tojoroy20, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Tojoroy20, good luck, and have fun. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 11:26, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jaby Koay (October 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Sourcing needs to be independent to establish notability, all statements need to be reliably sourced. WP:External links also need to be removed.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 09:05, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Tojoroy20! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 09:05, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohanpur, Tripura has been accepted

[edit]
Mohanpur, Tripura, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 00:50, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Netaji Subhash Mahavidyalaya (January 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LordVoldemort728 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Citations should be reliable and independent from the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk ! 11:36, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@LordVoldemort728 References are credible enough and not just a passing mention of the subject. References sufficiently substantiate the facts mentioned or stated about the subject. Some articles may not be directly about the subject, but they do not disprove the facts mentioned. All the other articles about Colleges of Tripura, for example Government Degree College, Amarpur, Government Degree College, Dharmanagar, Government Degree College, Gandacharra, Tripura Institute of Technology and all of them don't have any references or max to max one or two. In comparison to those, this is far better in terms of sources. Tojoroy20 (talk) 19:10, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Slayy Point (January 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jamiebuba (talk) 17:01, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Jamiebuba References are credible enough and not just a passing mention of the subject. Sources discuss a lot about the subject and the subject's work, rather than entire articles being based on the subject. Most of the sources are media articles, and are based on accurate information.Some articles may not be directly about the subject, but they do not disprove the facts mentioned. Information about Slayy Point is also available on wikidata.( I would be like to know exactly which sources are not considered reliable or In depth ) Tojoroy20 (talk) 17:32, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sandeep maheshwari (January 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 08:54, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 95th Academy Awards nominations from India (January 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at List of Indian winners and nominees of the Academy Awards. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
You can add the nominees to the overall lists.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:16, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Operation MBBS (January 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Akevsharma (talk) 12:48, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Infobox Test Symbol

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Infobox Test Symbol, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:34, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Assam
added links pointing to Bengali, Assamese and Boro
Andhra Pradesh
added a link pointing to Telugu

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jharkhand infobox edit

[edit]

Your edits to the infobox removed a lot of other additional languages [1] that are sourced. You should restore them as well - This is the particular part they got removed / modified ->

{{hlist |[[Angika]] |[[Bengali language|Bengali]] |[[Bhojpuri language|Bhojpuri]] |[[Bhumij language|Bhumij]] |[[Ho language|Ho]]| [[Kharia language|Kharia]] | [[Khortha language|Khortha]] | [[Kurmali language|Kurmali]] | [[Kurukh language|Kurukh]] | [[Magahi language|Magahi]] | [[Maithili language|Maithili]]|[[Mundari language|Mundari]] | [[Nagpuri language|Nagpuri]] | [[Odia language|Odia]] | [[Santali language|Santali]] |[[Urdu]]<ref name="The Avenue Mail">{{cite news |title=Jharkhand gives second language status to Magahi, Angika, Bhojpuri and Maithili |url=https://www.avenuemail.in/ranchi/jharkhand-gives-second-language-status-to-magahi-angika-bhojpuri-and-maithili/118291/ |work=The Avenue Mail |date=21 March 2018 |access-date=30 April 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190328090028/https://www.avenuemail.in/ranchi/jharkhand-gives-second-language-status-to-magahi-angika-bhojpuri-and-maithili/118291/ |archive-date=28 March 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Jharkhand notifies Bhumij as second state language |url=https://avenuemail.in/jharkhand-notifies-bhumij-as-second-state-language/ |access-date=17 April 2022 |work=The Avenue Mail |date=5 January 2019}}</ref>}}

Please add the above sourced part back to the |additional_official= parameter. Thanks. - 117.201.114.120 (talk) 11:48, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK I will, but as I'm not available right now, I have to do it later. You are also welcome to do so. Thank you -- Tojoroy20 (talk) 12:32, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I can't since the article is protected, please do whenever you get the time. Thanks. - 117.201.114.120 (talk) 15:04, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done added Tojoroy20 (talk) 21:37, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a bunch. Another thing, currently, the Symbols of XYZ-statename subsection (lightblue colored header) in the infobox only displays the language(s) that is written in |0fficial_Langs = parameter, but not the the ones written in |additional_official= parameter. Can the infobox code be modified in a way that the additional languages are also reflected there. Thanks. - 117.201.117.91 (talk) 11:57, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
From what I understand, as per your suggestion that, the language parameter used in the symbol section should be added manually by the editors and it should not only display the official language's value used above.  Is it?
If I understand correctly, then I also think it is a necessary proposal.
Well, I will make necessary changes as per your suggestion.
But that again since I am not available now so it may take some time. Again Thank you very much, keep suggesting. Tojoroy20 (talk) 12:13, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the wrong coding on "{{para|}}" in my previous reply, which might have made it incomprehensible. I've corrected it. What I meant is, the 'symbols' section automatically takes up the |0fficial_Langs = parameter displaying it as Language, but the additional official languages are not displayed in the 'symbols' section, that is it doesn't seem to take the values added in |additional_official= parameter. Thanks and welcome. - 117.201.118.223 (talk) 11:04, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

About Indian States GDP

[edit]

Hi @Tojoroy20: I saw you had added a new infobox for Indian state articles after thorough discussion. And I think it's great. I think I would like to allude to the fact that GDP is clearly mentioned in the infobox, but I can see it's also mentioned in the lead section of the article. Is it so necessary to mention it twice, both in the infobox and in the lead? I think mentioning it in the infobox is more than sufficient. What is your view regarding this issue? 2405:201:800B:684F:7465:69C5:7B8:BAC (talk) 17:57, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your concern about repetitiveness, but I don't think it is a major issue, since all the other information like population, area, cities are also sometimes mentioned in the lead section of articles along with Infobox. Also, many articles discuss the GDP topic in a very brief way ( like only discussing the rank) , where Infobox gives a quick look at the key facts. Although I really appreciate your discussion. Thank You Tojoroy20 (talk) 21:55, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Assam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boro.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

About West Bengal infobox

[edit]

Hi @Tojoroy20: please replace the old infobox template in the West Bengal article. I guess you somehow missed it. Thanks 2405:201:800B:684F:A115:8E2C:E32E:3396 (talk) 16:08, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to do it as soon as possible, as a student I am busy with exams these days so it takes some time. Thank you very much. Tojoroy20 (talk) 16:14, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Replaced — Tojoroy20 (talk) 21:47, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andaman and Nicobar Islands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saddle Peak.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Abhi and Niyu moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Abhi and Niyu, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 TT me 11:18, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May I know exactly on which basis and which portion of the article comes under COI. Tojoroy20 (talk) 11:26, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't really understand, which part of the article is proving that I am trying to promoting anyone. Tojoroy20 (talk) 11:30, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abhi and Niyu (May 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Deb was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Deb (talk) 08:27, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:32, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Wikipedia technical issues and templates request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) on a "Wikipedia technical issues and templates" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Boulapassa, Kailashahar

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Prarambh20. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Boulapassa, Kailashahar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:07, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:95th Academy Awards nominations from India

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Prarambh20. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:95th Academy Awards nominations from India, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:95th Academy Awards nominations from India

[edit]

Hello, Prarambh20. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "95th Academy Awards nominations from India".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 17:39, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Indian state or territory/styles.css

[edit]

Template:Infobox Indian state or territory/styles.css has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:44, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Abhi and Niyu

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Prarambh20. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Abhi and Niyu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Radha kishor institution

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Prarambh20. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Radha kishor institution, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adding parameter for state banner in Infobox Indian state or territory

[edit]

Hi, I need your help. I want to add a parameter for state banner in the infobox Indian state or territory, which will be on the left of the state seal, similar to how the flag and emblem icons are for infobox settlements. I need to know how to do it. I have been trying a lot to understand how to do it, but I can't seem to find my way out. Pur 0 0 (talk) 14:16, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Prarambh20&oldid=1239475741"