User talk:Train2104/Archive2011
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Train2104. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Your recent CSDs
We typically allow users a wide latitude in what they keep in their user space, even meaningless but harmless content isn't typically deleted unless the user themselves request deletion. There's no need to go around tidying other people's user space, it is in a sense kept for the user to do as they wish. henrik•talk 21:48, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
NYC Subway Map
The map uses some alternate names, or provide useful information as to cross streets.
Alternate names: 2 Av-Lower East Side is the original name of the stop, and it's still on the signs in the station; the same goes for 21st-Van Alst, Morrison/Soundview, etc.
Cross streets: Where it's useful for clarity, I've included the cross street in the station name, a la Vignelli. The 1 doesn't actually follow any particular street through Lower Manhattan, and the G jumps from avenue to avenue willy-nilly as it meanders through Brooklyn, and so forth.
Buses and the SIR: The M60 does run through 125th Street and meet all the Manhattan mainlines, but it unnecessarily clutters the map to show the entire crosstown bus line. The M60 isn't exactly a direct connection the way the AirTrain is, or the way the connection at 74th/Jackson Heights is. SIR Express won't fit on the line, which is why I use <SIR> the way I use <6>.
CountZ (talk) 04:18, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
Prod
I reverted your removal of the Category:Proposed deletion from some pages. I think you misunderstand something. In addition I am surprised that you think nobody would have removed them before, if they were out of place. This administrative part of Wikipedia is very well organized. Debresser (talk) 23:27, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
Editor review
You've probably forgotten about it by now, but I reviewed you. If you've any questions, feel free to ask. Cheers, C628 (talk) 23:49, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
En dashes
I spaced the en dashes as you requested, but during my recent FAC for Walden–Wallkill Rail Trail, I was told that having spaced en dashes between locales violated MOS:ENDASH. You may want to look into that.
--Gyrobo (talk) 20:40, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- After reading MOS:ENDASH again, I will have to start a discussion on WT:NYCPT. The way their naming conventions and what has been used in practice is what I followed in recommending the spacing. Reversion may be necessary. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 21:36, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Train2104 -I want to thank you for the recent edits you made to the two above articles. I knew that having duplicate info was redundant and that, at some point, the Fox Chase Rapid Transit Line article should be strictly about that operation. Anything relating to restoring service should be as part of the Fox Chase Line. Again, thanx!Oanabay04 (talk) 15:44, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- Now I'm starting to think the the 2 articles should be merged completely, with the RT article being a redirect. Good or bad? — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 16:05, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review
This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 5 March 2011 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding <!--noautoarchive--> to the review page will prevent further automated actions. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:38, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
WT:NYCPT, now
What reason did you have for this? WT:NYCPT#Train2104 and Reference Removal.Mitch32(Erie Railroad Information Hog) 17:30, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Merging You've Got Mail
It would be great if you and Chris could merge in the Tweet option per this. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:43, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Silver Line
I've seen those names as proposed, but is there a source saying they've been officially accepted by the WMATA? --Golbez (talk) 20:32, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- Per the Dr. Gridlock post I cited, these names have been approved by Fairfax County officials. If WMATA approves different names, we'll move them again. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 20:46, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- Fairfax County doesn't have the authority to name metro stations, though. On the other hand, one set of proposed names vs. another, might as well take the more recent/official proposal. --Golbez (talk) 20:50, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- True, and the original planning names are sure to go anyway. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 21:06, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- Fairfax County doesn't have the authority to name metro stations, though. On the other hand, one set of proposed names vs. another, might as well take the more recent/official proposal. --Golbez (talk) 20:50, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Ed Mangano
In response to your query: What kind of proof do you want that Nassau County gives permission for use of this photo? (Kingdoug55 (talk) 19:51, 31 March 2011 (UTC))
- Answered at your talk page. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 20:11, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Autoconfirmed RfC
A formal Request for Comment has now been started on this topic. Feel free to contribute; best, Ironholds (talk) 20:28, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
Removal of CfD tags from Former pupils by school in the United Kingdom
All done. (382 categories untagged). Chris the speller yack 04:14, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! If only the database report can be run again before next Saturday... — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 13:44, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
partial restoration
Fixed, and replied on my talk. Thanks for the catch. – SJ + 12:36, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
Croton–Harmon move
As I noted in reverting your move here, MOS:ENDASH does not require a space between the words and the dash where there are no spaces within the joined elements (contrast Middletown – Town of Wallkill (Metro-North station), correctly formatted). Daniel Case (talk) 15:11, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
13th Street/Juniper (SEPTA station)
User:Dream out loud doesn't believe that 13th/Juniper (SEPTA station) had the "Juniper" removed from it's name. Can you show him the proof of that? ----DanTD (talk) 23:31, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
- The proof I had was the schedule change notice, which is no longer online. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 23:35, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Oy vey, my poor watchlist
Thanks for updating the ridership figures! Larry V (talk | e-mail) 04:27, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- User:Geoking66 has reverted my edit on Flushing-Main St, claiming that precise ridership numbers should not be used. What do you think? I think it's fine so long as the number is right from the official page. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 12:56, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- I agree; as long as the figures are correct, I don't see the problem. Larry V (talk | e-mail) 01:40, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Re:Pending Changes
Thank you for your message. I will remove the protection from the article and re-add it once more with a semi-protect. Antonio Martin (talk) 20:23, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Don't reopen a month-old discussion. Start a new discussion if necessary. Anomie⚔ 00:34, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Commmons deletions
If Speedy per user request is not valid, what kind of tag do you want me to put on those?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 12:09, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- Maybe putting the tag on under your name. "I am the original uploader on enwiki and I request deletion". If that fails, notify an admin. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 12:16, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
File:Blumlein Pair.svg
I'm a bit confused as to why you tagged this image for speedy deletion. It was in use on Blumlein Pair and the page looks a bit off now as one of the three images is missing. It did not appear to be corrupt to me, although now that the image has been deleted I can't investigate. What was the problem, and why didn't you consider it appropriate to just request a new version to fix the problem? I will contact the admin as well. -- cmhTC 15:32, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- It was corrupt. It had the wrong MIME type. If you made this drawing yourself, make sure you are saving it as svg in whatever editor you are using, not just changing the file extension. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 15:39, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- Here is the top of my copy of the file: <!-- Generator: Adobe Illustrator 11 Build 196, SVG Export Plug-In . SVG Version: 6.0.0 Build 78) -->. Looks like it was exported as an SVG to me! -- cmhTC 15:48, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- Hmm, hang on. Illustrator won't open it anymore. Perhaps there was a bug in whatever version of illustrator exported it? I will investigate. -- cmhTC 15:52, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- OK, I fixed this. Still would have preferred a message rather than deletion as a bot came and messed up the page after the image was deleted. -- cmhTC 18:38, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- Hmm, hang on. Illustrator won't open it anymore. Perhaps there was a bug in whatever version of illustrator exported it? I will investigate. -- cmhTC 15:52, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- Here is the top of my copy of the file: <!-- Generator: Adobe Illustrator 11 Build 196, SVG Export Plug-In . SVG Version: 6.0.0 Build 78) -->. Looks like it was exported as an SVG to me! -- cmhTC 15:48, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
Newkirk Plaza
Do you have a source for the station rename? I noticed the official map has not changed yet, and that is usually the source we use per the naming convention. Acps110 (talk • contribs) 19:09, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
- There's a picture of a sign in the station somewhere. [1] Word on the MTA site will probably come next week. If there's no notification by Labor Day Tuesday, feel free to revert. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 19:22, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Oswald Jones
There is no use of that phrase on the Torchwood Miracle Day page, so why is it redirected there? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.197.91.17 (talk) 10:39, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
- Please don't blank redirects. If you disagree with a redirect and think it should be deleted, see WP:RFD. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 17:54, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Stephen Heywood file
Hi there, I recently uploaded a copyleft version of the Stephen Heywood profile, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Stephenprofile.jpg, via commons (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:StephenProfile2011.jpg), which is why I left that delete tag on the original. Or at least, I was pretty sure I uploaded it to Commons, where it should now be called StephenProfile2011. Anyway nothing links to the original anymore so I wanted to delete it and used that tag to do so. Please advise, I am not expert in the imaging rules of WP. --PaulWicks (talk) 21:18, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
- I'm confused. You uploaded the version on Wikipedia, then uploaded on Commons. Then you placed the tag on the original. I activated it and it got deleted. Now, the Commons file shows through. Do you want that one deleted as well??? — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 00:24, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, sorry about that. I just wanted one on Commons, which is StephenProfile2011.jpg with the explanation of the CCA license I wrote on to the page, so that PLM would be effectively releasing the image of just this one page of the website for use on WP (or wherever else people would like to use it). Thanks for your help! --PaulWicks (talk) 01:26, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you for your correction in my article. I saw that the correct station name appeared, I did not remember myself correcting it, and I did not look at the history of my article, so I wondered what happened. Now I see that you corrected my article 3 minutes after I created it! I don't know how you found it in my drafts.
I want to ask you to reply here.
Thank you once more.
Vcohen (talk) 19:54, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
File:Montclair Transit map.jpg
You tagged this image for F1 speedy deletion as a duplicate of itself. Would you please go back and retag it with the correct filename, so we can know which one needs to be deleted? Nyttend (talk) 23:49, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
- Oops. Fixed capitalization difference. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 23:54, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Re: A-C (New York City Subway service)
Where's the discussion page on the proposed deletion of A-C (New York City Subway service)? Because I want to throw in my support for this. It makes about as much sense as having one page for both the IRT Third Avenue Line and the IRT White Plains Road Line, or a page for both the Hempstead Branch and the Oyster Bay Branch. ----DanTD (talk) 00:04, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
- There's no discussion. It's proposed deletion. Add {{prod2}} if you feel like it. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 00:08, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
- Also look at F-V (New York City Subway service). — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 00:12, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Holding cell – French Republican Calendar mergers
Hello! See my comment at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Holding cell#To merge, the January 5 entry for the French Republican Calendar mergers. Thanks in advance, HeyMid (contribs) 09:52, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
- The remainder have been tagged for deletion (G8 for the nav template, G6 for the apparent missed AfD) — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 13:11, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
- The G6 has been executed. {{NavigationRepYears}} G8 has been denied. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 18:08, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 22:23, 5 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Ronhjones (Talk) 22:23, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
DELETING MY PAGES?
Yeah, fine with that, but if you could also delete File:Fluffy.JPG. Thanks. --Mocha2007 (talk) 16:26, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
Do you have a list of these that need to be deleted? (or could you make a list?) It'll be easier on admins patrolling CAT:SD if I can delete them all at once. -FASTILY (TALK) 21:14, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
- A complete deletion of all orphaned s-line templates (I do have a list) will require discussion, I'm only tagging those that I'm familiar with and know are useless. I'll start the discussion. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 21:15, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
- Great, thanks for doing that. Let me know how it goes. Regards, FASTILY (TALK) 21:18, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
- Discussion created. I have a feeling the outcome is not going to be what I want. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 21:29, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
- Great, thanks for doing that. Let me know how it goes. Regards, FASTILY (TALK) 21:18, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
Rollback removed
Hi, I removed your rollbacker user right as you are only supposed to use it for reverting vandalism. Cheers, --John (talk) 00:51, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
- What exactly did I do that was wrong? I did not violate the 3 revert rule. Please explain. Thanks! — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 01:06, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
- I was unhappy with this, not because I give stuff about the external link an IP added and I removed, and you reverted back in, but because per Help:Reverting this tool is only to be used for removing vandalism or vandalism-like edits. If it was an error, fair enough, but you should get into the habit of checking your contributions and see that you did what you thought you did. If, on the other hand, this was not an error, you should have (at least) posted to my talk and/or article talk explaining why the link helped the article, and you should have used undo rather than revert as well. --John (talk) 01:49, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
- It was an error in that I just saw the contents of the diff and reverted it, forgetting to check the user/edit summary, thinking it was another case of what has happened before with links in WP:NYCPT articles. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 19:18, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
- No problem, we all make errors. I can happily restore it if you can use it more carefully. --John (talk) 20:44, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
- Sure, I'll be more careful next time. Thanks! — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 20:50, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, I am restoring it on the basis that you'll be more careful and check back and communicate with users who you revert. Thanks and good luck. --John (talk) 21:41, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
- Sure, I'll be more careful next time. Thanks! — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 20:50, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
- No problem, we all make errors. I can happily restore it if you can use it more carefully. --John (talk) 20:44, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
- It was an error in that I just saw the contents of the diff and reverted it, forgetting to check the user/edit summary, thinking it was another case of what has happened before with links in WP:NYCPT articles. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 19:18, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
- I was unhappy with this, not because I give stuff about the external link an IP added and I removed, and you reverted back in, but because per Help:Reverting this tool is only to be used for removing vandalism or vandalism-like edits. If it was an error, fair enough, but you should get into the habit of checking your contributions and see that you did what you thought you did. If, on the other hand, this was not an error, you should have (at least) posted to my talk and/or article talk explaining why the link helped the article, and you should have used undo rather than revert as well. --John (talk) 01:49, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
File:UTDC VTA LightRailCar.jpg
I just tried to add an FU tag to File:UTDC VTA LightRailCar.jpg. Would this help? ----DanTD (talk) 14:41, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- This would work for now, but we should try to find a free equivalent if this car was in service as recently as 2003. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 14:44, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- I found some free equivalents. File:VTA UTDC car front.jpg File:VTA UTDC car side.jpg — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 15:01, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- The front one seems a little dark, and the side view of the cars could be any car for anybody knows. I transferred the image to the article on the manufacturer. ----DanTD (talk) 17:46, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- It has to be the new one because a) there are 4 windows between the car doors not 2 and b) it was taken in 2000, before the new ones were built in 2001. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 17:51, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- Also, we can't have non free images showing things that a free image could show, so I've removed it from the manufacturer's article. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 17:55, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- The replacement in the Urban Transportation Development Corporation looks a vague and ill-defined as it does in the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority light rail article. You might as well not use an SCVTA train for the UTCD article. Perhaps there's one in Sacramento or Salt Lake City that can replace this one. ----DanTD (talk) 18:12, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- The TTC one would work just as well. Plus, an in-service vehicle is better than a retired one for the header. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 18:18, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- I suppose you're right, especially when you consider the origins of the company. I just thought that since the one of the articles stated that the SCVTA trains were sold off to UTA Trax and SRTD, that we'd find the same trains there and replace this one with one of them. Sadly, I've had no such luck there. ----DanTD (talk) 20:38, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- The TTC one would work just as well. Plus, an in-service vehicle is better than a retired one for the header. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 18:18, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- The replacement in the Urban Transportation Development Corporation looks a vague and ill-defined as it does in the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority light rail article. You might as well not use an SCVTA train for the UTCD article. Perhaps there's one in Sacramento or Salt Lake City that can replace this one. ----DanTD (talk) 18:12, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- The front one seems a little dark, and the side view of the cars could be any car for anybody knows. I transferred the image to the article on the manufacturer. ----DanTD (talk) 17:46, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- I found some free equivalents. File:VTA UTDC car front.jpg File:VTA UTDC car side.jpg — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 15:01, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Official colors provided by MTA
Excellent work on finding the official colors, I have been looking for that info for sometime. Also good work on some of the historical bullets.
I just wanted to let you know in regards to updating the colors for commons:Category:New York City Subway bullets & commons:Category:New York City Subway line bullet composites, I have some scripts the will let me make the changes and do the re-upload all the images. It should only take me 30 minutes, and I plan to do it tomorrow night. --Svgalbertian (talk) 02:04, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for updating the bullets, but why did you make 2 uploads a file? Also, I fixed a minor typo in the N/Q/R/W color, if you copied straight from the MTA file you're fine, but if you copied my template you'll have to rerun. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 18:09, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
- The reason some are uploaded twice is the script crashed halfway through and needed to be restarted. As for the yellow, I just checked it out and everything is good.--Svgalbertian (talk) 00:28, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
- While we're on the subject Svgalbertian, have you ever considered my request for a new bullet composite for the IND Rockaway Line? I still can't make svg files to save my life. ----DanTD (talk) 02:31, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
- I can do that tomorrow. Black or transparent? I would assume it's just (A) (S). — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 02:40, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
- Transparent, and I was hoping for (A) <A> (S). Since the shuttles used to be black, and are now just a darker shade of gray, I'm concerned they might fade into the black background. ----DanTD (talk) 02:50, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
- I can do that tomorrow. Black or transparent? I would assume it's just (A) (S). — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 02:40, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
- While we're on the subject Svgalbertian, have you ever considered my request for a new bullet composite for the IND Rockaway Line? I still can't make svg files to save my life. ----DanTD (talk) 02:31, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
- The reason some are uploaded twice is the script crashed halfway through and needed to be restarted. As for the yellow, I just checked it out and everything is good.--Svgalbertian (talk) 00:28, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
How does this look? — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 13:44, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
- Fine with me, since I added it. I still have to cut down on the description, but it was longer when it was hidden. ----DanTD (talk) 14:22, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
Re:Script run request
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
-FASTILY (TALK) 01:45, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
CSD#G7
Sadly, does not apply to user talk pages - Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#G7 - so cannot delete those you tagged Ronhjones (Talk) 00:31, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
- I thought the rule was that a rationale must be needed. These pages were created in error or for users who retracted their warnings, so I believe they can go. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 00:33, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
- not deleted except under very exceptional circumstances - just an error, quickly removed with a edit summery hardly counts. The IPs would have probably seen by now anyway. Ronhjones (Talk) 00:44, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
Just a heads up, I moved the article you reported at Copyright Problems to the 23 October section from 4 October since it was tagged today.--NortyNort (Holla) 23:48, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, I just clicked the topmost header as I'm used to deletion discussions where recent is the top. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 23:58, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
vta light rail article
We should keep the current image of the UTDC car there until we can find the replacement. I'll try searching for one, I think I remember there being two, but both were very blurry, and the image quality wasn't that good, so I removed them. I think using the fair use image is the best bet until we can get a higher quality free image. Gamer9832 (talk) 00:12, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
- I've found the images. They are of adequate quality, but don't show the full vehicle in view, but instead show it over two images (one with the train side and one with the train front). It would be strange if there were two images of UTDC vehicles on the main VTA light rail article, when they haven't been in service for around 10 years. I think we should stick with the old one until we can find a replacement that shows a complete view of the car in one image. Gamer9832 (talk) 00:22, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image warnings
|
|---|
Orphaned non-free image File:MorristownLine.svg PLEASE NOTE:
Orphaned non-free image File:NorthJerseyCoastLine.svgPLEASE NOTE:
Orphaned non-free image File:MontclairBoontonLine.svgPLEASE NOTE:
Orphaned non-free image File:RaritanValleyLine.svgPLEASE NOTE:
Orphaned non-free image File:NortheastCorridorLine.svgPLEASE NOTE:
Orphaned non-free image File:MainLine.svgPLEASE NOTE:
Orphaned non-free image File:BergenCountyLine.svgPLEASE NOTE:
Orphaned non-free image File:GladstoneBranch.svgPLEASE NOTE:
Orphaned non-free image File:AtlanticCityLine.svgPLEASE NOTE:
Orphaned non-free image File:PascackValleyLine.svgPLEASE NOTE:
|
NJT logos
Hello. You have a new message at Oknazevad's talk page. oknazevad (talk) 16:00, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
Disruptive editing (from BMA Medical college)
I'm a student of the Faculty of Medicine, Vajira Hospital
from the page BMA Medical college that you spoke of Disruptive editing
I want to assure you that I have no intention of Disruptive editing my purpose for blanking the page is to put it on page delete.
It would surely by disruptive to delete someone else's work, but this is one of the pages I created.
I am doing a bit of organizing, and the real article has quite sufficient redirect pages already
and the problem is that a Facebook community page (linked to wikipedia) disappeared the same day after I created this link, caused by what I'm still not sure
so I'm trying to undo my changes
It would be thankful if you could delete the page for me
or if you know the real causes of the problem or any suggestions, I would be very happy to be informed
Sincerely, Nattmun
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nattmun (talk • contribs) 06:39, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
Done Page tagged for deletion. Sorry for the warnings. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 10:43, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
![[1]](http://i59.photobucket.com/albums/g301/Newkirk-Plaza-David/IMAG1992.jpg){kind=link}
Hello Train2104, with regard to your request at WP:REFUND, since nobody else responded before me and my knowledge of the subject area is almost non-existent, hereunder I have copied the FUR rationales which appeared on the deleted file's page.
| FUR rationales |
|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
== Summary ==
{{Information
|Description= Buraidah College of Technology Logo
|Source= http://www.tvtc.gov.sa/english/trainingunits/collegesoftechnology/bct/Pages/default.aspx
|Date= 2011
|Author= Unknown
|Permission= Non-free logo
|other_versions=
}}
{{logo fur
| Article = Buraidah College of Technology
| Use = Org
<!-- ADDITIONAL INFORMATION -->
| Used for =
| Owner =
| Website = http://www.tvtc.gov.sa/english/trainingunits/collegesoftechnology/bct/Pages/default.aspx
| History =
| Commentary =
<!--OVERRIDE FIELDS -->
| Description =
| Source =
| Portion =
| Low_resolution =
| Purpose = <!--Must be specified if Use is not Infobox / Org / Brand / Product-->
| Replaceability =
| other_information =
}}
{{logo fur
| Article = TVTC
| Use = Org
<!-- ADDITIONAL INFORMATION -->
| Used for =
| Owner =
| Website = http://www.tvtcj.info/live2.aspx
| History =
| Commentary =
<!--OVERRIDE FIELDS -->
| Description =
| Source =
| Portion =
| Low_resolution =
| Purpose = <!--Must be specified if Use is not Infobox / Org / Brand / Product-->
| Replaceability =
| other_information =
}}
== Licensing: ==
{{Non-free logo}}
|
By the way, if you wish, I can also undelete File:Buraidah College of TechnologyLogo.png and delete File:TVTCLogo.png. Cheers. Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:36, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, restoration's not needed, just the FUR's. — Train2104 (talk •contribs • count) 18:36, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Buddleja and Ulmus images
Emails from the generators of these images confirming their permissions have now been sent (copied to me) in the last two weeks. I am therefore rather perturbed to see you have just primed them for deletion on 30 November. Ptelea (talk) 11:17, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
- I did not tag them for deletion, all I did was push the deletion date back to Dec 1 which is what User:Ronhjones desired when he tagged them. Ask him for details. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 13:25, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Select Bus Service
Hey, I've created two new redirects for Select Bus Service; Bx12 SBS (New York City bus) and M15 SBS (New York City bus). M34 (New York City bus) and M34A (New York City bus) already existed. All of those now link to the proper section in the Select Bus Service article. Please link to them instead of linking directly to a section. It makes the inevitable changes later much easier, because only the redirect has to change. Acps110 (talk • contribs) 23:41, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
- Well, it's a bit late for that as I don't expect to be linking to the older SBS's anytime in the near future. But if I come across one, I'll use it. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 23:51, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! Acps110 (talk • contribs) 00:00, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Good idea, I did wonder if that was possible, but there was nowhere that said one could force a long date, and dates in templates sometimes get "tweaked" by some bot! Since nothings gone wrong in four days - I think we can assume that it will be fine. I changed the noticed on all the images to Deletion has been delayed since end October to allow non existant OTRS to be sorted out - now we have a firm date, I didn't need that long message. Thank heavens for AWB... Ronhjones (Talk) 22:09, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, but it appears that the tag you placed on the Oct 31 category is causing a 5-day backlog in F11's. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 22:16, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Permission to add File:Wpdms DSCN1562e crane.JPG
I found out after you tagged File:Wpdms DSCN1562e crane.JPG for deletion duet to lack of permission, that the uploader himself was the photographer. Check his user page and you'll find this out. ----DanTD (talk) 20:49, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 20:51, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Patrol vesses category
Whats the backstory with all those categories you listed for speedly deletion?©Geni 01:34, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
- Found them on the empty categories database report and tagged them as C1's. 4 days later they're up for deletion... I was not involved in the emptying nor do I know who did it. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 01:36, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
File:BioMartLogo.png
Hi Train2104,
It appears that your account flagged File:BioMartLogo.png as User talk:Tnabtaf#Non-free_rationale_for_File:BioMartLogo.png. This was probably my third attempt to find a copyright notice that is both close to the truth and acceptable to the Wikipedia community. I'm afraid if I try again I will completely drift away from an appropriate license. Is there any chance I could get you to set this file's permissions to something that won't raise a red flag?
It's the logo of an open source project: BioMart.
Thanks in advance,
--Tnabtaf (talk) 23:49, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- I put this as a free file. Upon second thought, it somewhat is, given that there's only text and circles. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 23:55, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- Gracias. User:Tnabtaf
Penn Station track assignments
I do not quite understand why we should list 1-4 as Amtrak as well. Sure Keystones COULD use 1-4, but such would only happen in an emergency. It is my experience that NJT or Amtrak will use 17-19 or LIRR will use 5-12 far more often than Amtrak will use 1-4. Perhaps we can revert to normal uses with a note at the bottom? I Appreciate that you took the time to leave an explanation.
Sidenote: As I would say roughly 75% of my usage of NYP is on LIRR, and most of the other 25% is on non-Keystone Amtrak, I am far more likely to see the diversions I listed, but that said I still have never seen 1-4 used by Amtrak.67.247.23.150 (talk) 23:01, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
- We can make it two parts: normal operations NJT 1-4, Amtrak/NJT 5-12, All 3 13-176, LIRR 17-21. Then add a note that exceptions can be made if there is a problem. (no need to specify the exceptions) — Train2104 (talk • contribs) 23:09, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
- Updated to follow your general idea- Perhaps you have a better wording than I came up with, but I think its ok. 67.247.23.150 (talk) 02:57, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi Train2104, I've declined your speedies of files such as File:Histogram of MPG.gif on Commons. If you want them deleted, you'll have to start a deletion request on commons. We typically don't delete files based on cross-wiki decisions. -FASTILY (TALK) 00:40, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
- The uploader agreed with the deletion. If that's not OK, I'll start a DR. — Train2104 (talk • contribs) 00:49, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
- The files were uploaded by different users. Is User:ST2002 the same person behind all the accounts? If not, then you need to start a DR. Otherwise, I can delete everything. -FASTILY (TALK) 03:28, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
- You can go ahead-it appears that ST2002 is an instructor and the other accounts are his students. — Train2104 (talk • contribs) 03:32, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
- I'm afraid I cannot do that. The uploader of each respective file must explicitly request deletion. I can nuke all files uploaded by User:ST2002, but the rest will have to go to DR -FASTILY (TALK) 02:08, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
- DR created — Train2104 (talk • contribs) 03:58, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
- Great, thanks for doing that. Best, FASTILY (TALK) 04:01, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
- DR created — Train2104 (talk • contribs) 03:58, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
- I'm afraid I cannot do that. The uploader of each respective file must explicitly request deletion. I can nuke all files uploaded by User:ST2002, but the rest will have to go to DR -FASTILY (TALK) 02:08, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
- You can go ahead-it appears that ST2002 is an instructor and the other accounts are his students. — Train2104 (talk • contribs) 03:32, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
- The files were uploaded by different users. Is User:ST2002 the same person behind all the accounts? If not, then you need to start a DR. Otherwise, I can delete everything. -FASTILY (TALK) 03:28, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Jay's-treaty.jpg is legit
It's the cover page of an actual 1795 American pamphlet and comes from a RS. there is no hoax and no reason for deletion (it is in public domain published pre 1923) Rjensen (talk) 02:04, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
- The file is legit and I never wanted it deleted. I wanted the talk page deleted. — Train2104 (talk • contribs) 02:10, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
Speedy criteria G8
Please note that sub pages in user space are permissible, even if the main user page doesn't exist. The wording in WP:CSD#G8 probably needs tweaking to make this clear. An optimist on the run! 18:23, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Template:LIRR color/doc
I just tried to edit Template:LIRR color/doc, and lost the detail and background you had. How do I get it back? ----DanTD(talk)
- Note that the category removal that you did removes the category from the main template page. If that is the intended outcome, then I don't see any problems with your edit. It may look odd because you're not viewing it in its transcluded state. Just redo the edit and view the main page not the /doc subpage. — Train2104 (talk •contribs) 04:54, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- Wrong page. It was actually Template:LIRR color. I really just wanted to get rid of Category:Templates for LIRR lines, and that's what I've been having trouble with. ----DanTD (talk) 05:35, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- What you did on the doc page accomplishes that. The same can be done for {{LIRR links}}.— Train2104 (talk • contribs) 11:46, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- Really? Because this time I successfully removed them, but they're still showing up on Category:Templates for LIRR lines. Should I try a purge function? ----DanTD (talk)
- Not anymore...you have to wait for the jobqueue, which should take no longer than 5 minutes. If it doesn't update within 5 min, purge thecategory. If still not, null edit the template (edit and save w/o ANY changes). — Train2104 (talk • contribs) 15:51, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- Really? Because this time I successfully removed them, but they're still showing up on Category:Templates for LIRR lines. Should I try a purge function? ----DanTD (talk)
- What you did on the doc page accomplishes that. The same can be done for {{LIRR links}}.— Train2104 (talk • contribs) 11:46, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- Wrong page. It was actually Template:LIRR color. I really just wanted to get rid of Category:Templates for LIRR lines, and that's what I've been having trouble with. ----DanTD (talk) 05:35, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Category:Images of Sleepy Hollow Cemetery
Weren't there a whole bunch of images of Sleepy Hollow Cemetery in the Category:Images of Sleepy Hollow Cemetery? I only found 13 in the commons, and if the ones that were there were moved to the commons, they ought to be in commons category. ----DanTD (talk) 01:11, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- I tagged this because it showed up in a list of empty categories, I don't know who emptied it or what their motives were.— Train2104 (talk • contribs) 01:19, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, I see it's an empy category. I just wanted to be sure it was emptied in a legitimate way. ----DanTD (talk) 01:29, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- UPDATE - I just searched through the commons, and spotted a few images that should've been added to that category, some of which were uncategorized. I'm still convinced there might be more. ----DanTD (talk) 02:07, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, I see it's an empy category. I just wanted to be sure it was emptied in a legitimate way. ----DanTD (talk) 01:29, 26 December 2011 (UTC)