User talk:Zeke, the Mad Horrorist/Archive 5

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Please comment on Talk:AURORA

 Done

 – Responded there with Not sure, leaning proper noun.

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:AURORA. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Cold War II

 Done

 – Responded there with a comment.

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cold War II. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors 2015 End of Year Report

Guild of Copy Editors 2015 End of Year Report Our 2015 End of Year Report is now ready for review. Highlights: Summary of Drives, Blitzes, and the Requests page; New record lows in the article backlog and on the Requests page; Coordinator election results; Membership news; Changes around the Guild's pages; Plans for 2016. – Your project coordinators: Jonesey95, Miniapolis and Baffle gab1978. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by Jonesey95 via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:42, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bill Cosby sexual assault allegations

 Declined

 – Looks like an unholy mess. And that's without the RfC being improperly timed (as some have complained).

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bill Cosby sexual assault allegations. Legobot (talk) 00:07, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Smashing Pumpkins

 Done

 – Responded there with sorta neutral.

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Smashing Pumpkins. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Exposing to the right

 Declined

 – I'm not a photography buff (yet, I kind of want to be), but aside from that this looks like an unholy nightmare. I'd be in WAY over my head.

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Exposing to the right. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Second Stage Turbine Blade

 Declined

 – I don't know enough about the album to commemnt on what its genre(s) should be.

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Second Stage Turbine Blade. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Debbie Does Dallas

 Done

 – Responded there with external link.

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Debbie Does Dallas. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Proscenium

 Declined

 – I really have no idea what's going on over there.

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Proscenium. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Two years ago ...

Prior to the Fire
... you were recipient no. 784 of Precious, a prize of QAI!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:47, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Videos

 Done

 – Been there since before I got this notice, actually. Nevertheless, I answered preference for C, but I'll take B if that's not possible.

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Videos. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sicario (2015 film)

 Declined

 – I'm staying away from discussions concerning movies I've not yet checked out.

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sicario (2015 film). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Gamergate controversy

 Declined

 – Yuck. No.

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gamergate controversy. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors April 2016 Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors April 2016 Newsletter March drive: Thanks to everyone who participated in last month's backlog-reduction drive. Of the 28 people who signed up, 21 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. April blitz: The one-week April blitz, again targeting our long requests list, will run from April 17–23. Awards will be given to everyone who copyedits at least one article from the requests page. Sign up here! May drive: The month-long May backlog-reduction drive, with extra credit for articles tagged in March, April, and May 2015, and all request articles, begins May 1. Sign up now! Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Miniapolis, and Baffle gab1978. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Superman

 Declined

 – I know virtually nothing about this franchise. I would be in no position to determine whose treatment of what is better.

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Superman. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums

 Done

 – Responded there with Follow RS.

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Woo Woo, Zeke!

You don't expect your edit on 9/11 to be left standing, do you? ;-) Grammar's Li'l Helper ^Discourse 06:21, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Top Model (Scandinavia)

 Done

 – Responded there with Leaning Table B.

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Top Model (Scandinavia). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Full Service (book)

 Declined

 – No familiarity with the subject matter.

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Full Service (book). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:NHL 15

 Declined

 – I don't know enough about the games to know whether such things as "better graphical elements" are noteworthy enough for their articles.

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:NHL 15. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Hillary Clinton email controversy

 Declined

 – Nothing I say could matter at this point. It definitely seems to be headed in one direction as opposed to the other.

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hillary Clinton email controversy. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016 Guild of Copy Editors Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors June 2016 News Hello everyone, welcome to the June 2016 GOCE newsletter. It's been a few months since we sent one out; we hope y'all haven't forgotten about the Guild! Your coordinators have been busy behind the scenes as usual, though real life has a habit of reducing our personal wiki-time. The May backlog reduction drive, the usual coordinating tasks and preparations for the June election are keeping us on our toes! May drive: Thanks to everyone who participated in last month's record-setting backlog reduction drive. Of the 29 people who signed up, 16 copyedited at least one article, 197 copyedits were recorded on the drive page, and the copyedit backlog fell below 1,500 for the first time! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. June Blitz: this one-week copy-editing blitz will occur from 12 June through 18 June; the themes will be video games and Asian geography. Coordinator elections: It's election time again; how quickly they seem to roll around! Nominations for the next tranche of Guild coordinators, who will serve a six-month term that begins at 00:01 UTC on 1 July and ends at 23:59 UTC on 31 December, opens at 00:01 UTC on 1 June and closes at 23:59 UTC on 15 June. Voting takes place between 00:01 UTC on 16 June and 23:59 UTC on 30 June. If you'd like to assist behind the scenes, please consider stepping forward; self-nominations are welcomed and encouraged. All Wikipedia editors in good standing are eligible; remember it's your Guild, and it doesn't run itself! Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Miniapolis and Baffle gab1978. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:War & Peace (2016 TV series)

 Done

 – Responded there with title card.

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:War & Peace (2016 TV series). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (music)

 Done

 – Responded there to favor ignoring Discogs from here on out.

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (music). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Regarding Ark Music Factory status

You seem like a good guy so let's discuss it civilly. There are multiple sings that the company in question is no longer active. Their official website, YouTube channel and social media profiles hasn't been updated for more than 3 years. While they were showing some kind of activity, they only had 1 signed artist - Lexi St. George, which probably parted with them, and that is the reason for their collapse i'm guessing. St0n3 BG (talk) 00:04, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors July 2016 News

Guild of Copy Editors July 2016 News Hello everyone, and welcome to the July 2016 GOCE newsletter. June Blitz: this one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 12 through 18 June; the themes were video games and Asian geography. Of the 18 editors who signed up, 11 removed 47 articles from the backlog. Barnstars and rollover totals are located here. Thanks to all editors who took part. Coordinator elections: The second tranche of Guild coordinators for 2016, who will serve a six-month term until 23:59 UTC on 31 December, have been elected. Jonesey95 remains as your drama-free Lead Coordinator, and Corinne and Tdslk are your new assistant coordinators. For her long service to the Guild, Miniapolis has been enrolled in the GOCE Hall of Fame. Thanks to everyone who voted in the election; our next scheduled one occurs in December 2016. All Wikipedia editors in good standing are eligible; self-nominations are welcome and encouraged. July Drive: Our month-long July Copy Editing Backlog Elimination Drive is now underway. Our aim is to remove articles tagged for copy-edit in April, May and June 2015, and to complete all requests on the GOCE Requests page from June 2016. The drive ends at 23:59 on 31 July 2016 (UTC). Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators: Jonesey95, Corinne and Tdlsk. >>> Sign up for the July Drive! <<<

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:54, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Kodak Black

 Declined

 – Not taking feedback requests at the moment.

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kodak Black. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Kesuke Miyagi

 Declined

 – Not taking feedback requests at the moment.

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kesuke Miyagi. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling

 Declined

 – Not taking feedback requests at the moment.

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics

 Declined

 – Not taking feedback requests at the moment.

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Precious three years!

Precious

Three years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:48, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Four years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:00, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

My user scripts don't seem to be working

My script to automatically sort deletion discussions at WP:AFD is no longer active, nor is my script to simply click "Install" next to scripts I want to install on pages that list them. Has something happened that I'm not aware of? Why don't the scripts I've installed work anymore? Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 06:25, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Do you have any errors in your console? --Northiie (talk • contribs) 07:47, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Errors in my console? Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 08:14, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

See step six in WP:JSERROR. --Northiie (talk • contribs) 09:10, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Okay, I think this is mostly my fault. I thought my Delsort script wasn't working because I forgot you have to click More at the top of the page, but I do think the Install button script wasn't working for a time for some reason. It is now. Thank you for the assistance you have provided; I couldn't find any errors in my console, but just in case it matters it showed me a lot of "X is deprecated" stuff. Don't know if that means anything... Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 02:26, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Your remark on the holocaust and my understanding of it

Hi Zeke. First and foremost allow me to apologize for my misunderstanding of your comment.

Let me also apologize and say I thought I warned you on your talk page about my remark on ANI the Incidents list of the Administrator noticeboard (not sure where it is now, that's where it was during your latest edit.)

There is still something open which I wish to understand.

In a discussion about deleting a page titled: "Proof the Nazis deliberately killed six million Jews" which redirected to holocaust denial you voted to delete it and wrote the following: (my tilting)

Delete, WP:POV, not to mention that it's a pretty specific search term that isn't likely to be used. While it's pretty clear that the Nazis performed the Holocaust, this was probably created out of (understandable) spite for the target.

When you wrote WP:POV, what were you referring to? The number of victims? The Nazi regime's deliberate intentions? The wording: "The Nazis"? All those together? Something else?

My understanding was that in your vote for deletion at this stage of the discussion, you were saying that the claims of the title are a POV and that, therefore, you yourself were denying the Holocaust, it's horrific vast range, and it's premeditated ideology, plan, and execution.

You then went on to add "this was probably created..."

I (understandably) as you can see, read this as the Holocaust being "performed" due to understandable spite of their target: the Jews.

You wrote: I know this discussion is closed, but since it's about me, I feel obligated to chime in (and am putting it underneath the part I'm not supposed to mess with). I'm glad most people understood my comment as intended, but perhaps I should have written "spite for the subject of the target article", as that is what I meant...

I apologize again about the misunderstanding, but still don't fully understand two things:

1. Who or what is "the subject of the target article" that the writer of this redirection had spite on? Or was it a mistake of yours and you meant the Nazis (which are not the subject of the target article, niether the redirecting nore the redirected-to page)?

2. Could you please explain the POV remark?

Last but not least, I did check and see that you are NOT a writer on these issues, and that you do exceptionally good work on WP. Thank you again, and apologies again. Moshe פשוט pashute ♫ (talk) 16:21, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

OK thank you. Alls well that ends well.

Basically you responded on my talk page explaining:

a. The page was written due to (understandable) spite for Holocaust denial.

b. That you felt the name of the deleted page was charged with feelings or was written with a biased moral stance, which you claim cannot be part of Wikipedia. (I beg to defer but don't wish to argue on it).

c. That your stance on the issue is that you stand against holocaust denial.

In the details of your answer you wrote about your problem with the word deliberate, which should not be used, in your opinion, on WP. I wrote that the deliberation of an action can be proven, by showing evidence of threats, planning, setting up mechanisms, orders, and admittance. I noted that the claim of indelibarate killing of most of the Jews (for the sole reason of being Jewish) is part of Holocaust Denial.

If you wish to discuss this, I would rather we do so on your talk page.

I wish to say again, thank you. And again I appologize. Alls well that ends well. פשוט pashute ♫ (talk) 23:12, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

@Pashute: I really have no idea how I can explain this much more clearly to you (for those of you just tuning in, please check his talk page for the missing portion of this conversation). We're treading into territory that I'm not comfortable discussing on Wikipedia. I'm not going to continue this conversation further as I've said all that I can possibly think of to explain myself to you. Every time I say something else you bring up something I said that can be vaguely misconstrued as something I never meant. I'm close to asking for a third opinion, but since this is no longer a content dispute, this is no longer suitable for this site and I'm getting weary of discussing this further. I thought we had reached an understanding, but I keep saying things that upset you to some degree even though you're taking them completely the wrong way. Let me just make this clear - I am in absolutely no way anti-Semitic, and that's that. That's all I know I can say that I can have you understand as I intended. Have a nice day, and please do not reply to this post. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 10:31, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Help me!

About three years ago I moved the page REC 3: Genesis from its Spanish title to the English equivalent, per WP:UE. About three months later, I was reverted without being made aware of it. I only noticed it a few minutes ago.

I admit I don't have much experience with page moves, and the few times I've tried, things seem to have changed. A few years ago, I recall it being the case that once a page had been moved I could not move it back using the page move form because moves always leave redirects behind. If I tried, I'd get a notice saying the move could not be done.

Apparently that has changed, because I tried it again out of curiosity, and I found that the redirects left behind by the other editor's reversal of my move - I fear a dispute brewing here, but that's not the point of this post - were automatically deleted per WP:G6. The pages where the redirects once existed are now where the proper article and its associated talk page reside; the Spanish versions are now the redirects.

As the pages had not been moved in such a way before, the page move did not happen this way three years ago.

I do not believe I had any such authority to make this move, and I apologize if I have overstepped my bounds. I'm definitely confused as to what's going on here. As to why I did what I did in the first place, or whether my rationale is valid, that's not the point of my request - I only want to know if I should have sought some sort of consensus or authorization for this action, since it resulted in speedy deletion of two redirects, and if so, where should I have sought it out? My understanding is that only admins and the like have the authority to apply this criterion and use it to delete pages, regardless of how truly uncontroversial such deletions are.

I believe I should have initiated some kind of discussion on the talk page first. I only did so after I performed the page move. I definitely think I followed the steps out of order here.

Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 10:53, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

It's possible for any registered user to move a page over a redirect pointing to that page if that redirect has a trivial page history, as these had. In such cases the redirect is deleted automatically to make way for the page to be moved; this does not require being an admin (I think at least part of the purpose is to allow non-admins to undo page move vandalism). The move will leave behind a redirect which again has a trivial page history, so the page move can be reverted. Huon (talk) 12:33, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewing

Hello, Zeke, the Mad Horrorist. I've seen you editing recently and you seem knowledgeable about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 09:42, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Your signature

Resolved

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. Your signature is also causing Tidy bug affecting font tags wrapping links.

You are encouraged to change

<font color="gray">'''Zeke'''</font>, the '''Mad <font color="blue">Horrorist</font>''' <small><sup>[[User talk:Zeke, the Mad Horrorist|(Speak quickly)]]</sup> <sub>[[Special:Contribs/Zeke, the Mad Horrorist|(Follow my trail)]]</sub></small> → Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)}

to

<span style="color:gray;">'''Zeke'''</span>, the '''Mad <span style="color:blue;">Horrorist</span>''' <small><sup>[[User talk:Zeke, the Mad Horrorist|(Speak quickly)]]</sup> <sub>[[Special:Contribs/Zeke, the Mad Horrorist|(Follow my trail)]]</sub></small> → Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)}

Respectfully, Anomalocaris (talk) 20:33, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for taking care of this! —Anomalocaris (talk) 06:11, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Euphemisms

Hi. For the record, "passed away" is a euphemism discouraged by the manual of style. When someone dies, just say they died. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:17, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Scale the Summit Carving Desert Canyons.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Scale the Summit Carving Desert Canyons.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Scale the Summit The Collective.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Scale the Summit The Collective.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Zeke, the Mad Horrorist. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Five years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:15, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

six years now --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:10, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for adding my script

Thank you. Can you share why you didn't use it to correct typos? You should see "Replace" button on my page: User:Uziel302/Typos. Let me know if you need any help. Uziel302 (talk) 17:01, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

"Virgiinia" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Virgiinia. Since you had some involvement with the Virgiinia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:06, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:The Jelly Jam albums

A tag has been placed on Category:The Jelly Jam albums requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:48, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

"Lake (disambiguation" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lake (disambiguation. Since you had some involvement with the Lake (disambiguation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. DannyS712 (talk) 06:11, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Category:Coconut Records (musician) albums has been nominated for renaming

Category:Coconut Records (musician) albums has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:37, 10 July 2020 (UTC)