Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 September 17

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 17

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox religious building. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 14:50, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox Shinto shrine with Template:Infobox religious building.
Redundancy, following the case with likewise merged Template:Infobox Hindu temple. Chicbyaccident (talk) 16:17, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:01, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:34, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

West Virginia TV network affiliation templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn (non-admin closure) 64222368Z260O talk 64222368Z260O 03:14, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

These templates should all be merged into Template:TV Stations West Virginia as the TV stations could be sorted by network affiliation in one template such as in Template:TV Stations North Dakota, Template:TV Stations Montana and Template:TV Stations Idaho. 2601:587:100:6D8:C4BD:E286:8FE3:EA33 (talk) 23:38, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Plastikspork (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 00:01, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, incomplete and not needed. – BrandonXLF (t@lk) 04:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 14:52, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 02:18, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 September 25. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:48, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete the Sydney template; no articles currently use the template. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 14:58, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Public transport operators in Sydney with Template:Infobox Bus transit.
I see no reason for a unique template for 1 page. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 02:09, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 September 25. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:34, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Userfy to User:Brian0918/tables/Randomtools (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:02, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Only transclusion is in a user page. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 02:05, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 September 25. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:08, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Template:Topics and keep Template:Archive box. There is no point continuing discussion so I will close this early as there is unanimous consensus to:

(non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:57, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Topics with Template:Archive box.
Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 01:55, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

   ? Ques: What will become of the forced bylines which state Topical archives and Chronological archives if the merge is carried out. Will these be removable?  spintendo  09:10, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Spintendo: well right now it isn't used at all so I don't see any reason to keep it? But those certainly could be rolled into {{archive box}} if needed...--Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:55, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Kayne West album track list templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:07, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant navigation to the {{Kanye West songs}} navigation box, which already groups the songs by album anyway. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 16:51, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:ILIKEIT-UCO2009bluejay (talk) 22:44, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:16, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:39, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).