User talk:Natl1

This user may have left Wikipedia. Natl1 has not edited Wikipedia since 29 November 2013. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Natl1's


User Page	Talk Page	Contrib's

Welcome To My Talk Page

Click Here To Leave me A Message.

Archive 1
Archive 2

Your RfA

You will likely get comments about following the instructions correctly, specifically #6, in bold. Best wishes in your quest. Frank | talk 16:35, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

:-( What a crappy RfA. —Giggy 06:30, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Smile

Your a nice guy who will someday be a great admin. MBisanz ^talk has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Huggle feedback

Hi there. The issue you participated in here has been archived. The features requested were added to the most recent version of huggle released today. If you would like to query me about this please ask me on my talk page As I will not be watching this page. Thanks. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 15:09, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Your other huggle feedback has been archived here This was not acted upon as not enough information was given. If you still think this is a problem please make a new section at the bottom of the feedback page. Thanks. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 15:15, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anon's health addition on Russia article

Hello, you commented on Talk:Russia on this issue and RfC'ed but took it away after you thought the issue was over. Looks like anonymous IP is back after his 3 day block for block evasion and breaking the 3RR and the semi-protection of the article expired.[1] Anon seems to ignore everything we say and facts that I point out and thinks that brute edit warring and repeating the same defeated argument ad nauseam, instead of gaining WP:CONCENSUS for his new controversial edit which there obviously isn't, will keep this information in. He seems to want to make a WP:POINT that Russia has a bad health care system ("The article is biased, and gives wrong impression. Sounds like "russia got such a great free universal health care system, and all problems is just came from nowhere"). He is blaming it on propiska (freedom of movement which affects access to health care if not correctly followed), which has nothing to do with quality of health care services and doesn't affect 99% of Russians.

Source: "Те же, кто медицинский полис имеет, не могут получить медицинскую помощь на территории, не совпадающей с их регистрацией.") - Translation - "Those who have a medical policy cannot receive medical care in the territory not concurrent with their registration (propiska)". ie If people followed the rule and sought medical care in the territory concurrent with their registration like they are supposed to like 99% of Russians, then they would have no problem.

Even if it was, this is WP:UNDUE as it doesn't affect 99% of Russians ("Количество потенциальных жертв подобной дискриминации составляет минимум 3 миллиона человек." Translation - article said propiska affects 3 million Russians - that's only around 2% of the population, and "potentially" at that, and this figure counts all the various aspects of discrimination via propiska that the article covered, not solely health care). He seems that think that WP:UNDUE covers only minority views but he needs to read closer (Undue weight applies to more than just viewpoints. Just as giving undue weight to a viewpoint is not neutral, so is giving undue weight to other verifiable and sourced statements. An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject, but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. Note that undue weight can be given in several ways, including, but not limited to, depth of detail, quantity of text, prominence of placement, and juxtaposition of statements.) - the fact that it doesn't affect 99% of Russians, who follow the law, and that all the health-care systems in other countries with so called "free" health-care have some sorts of restrictions and rules, makes it certainly undue). Furthermore, it states half of the 3 million figure are people working in Moscow, ("Около половины от этого числа людей работают в Москве, остальные, как правило, трудятся в других крупных городах страны"), so it is hardly a nationwide problem, it is a localised, freedom of movement problem, not a health care problem.--Miyokan (talk) 12:22, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anon likes to revert a lot and will most likely keep breaking the 3RR if he has to. I have put back your RfC, although I don't know if it's formatted correctly - could you check?--Miyokan (talk) 12:40, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, but that is wrong translation from Russian. It literally tells: "the number of potential victims of this discrimination is AT LEAST three million people", not "propiska affects potentially 3 million Russians". It does not tell "Russians", it does not tell "propiska" and so on.Biophys (talk) 13:06, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it says "The number of potential victims of such discrimination is at least 3 million people". Yes, it is referring to Russian citizens, "Russians", I wasn't giving a word for word translation. The 3 million figure was referring to all the different types of propiska discrimination, and it was mentioned after talking about employment discrimination, not health care. The article covered the right to work, to health care, to buy state housing, registration of motor vehicles, to obtain a loan and suffrage - "Среди прав, которые незаконно поставлены в зависимость от наличия регистрации, - право на труд, на медицинскую помощь, на покупку квартир по программе "Доступное жилье", на регистрацию автомобилей, на получение кредита и даже активное избирательное право.", health care was just one of the areas briefly touched upon, and it said the 3 million figure. The figure is still 3 million (only 2% of pop.) and it is still a freedom of movement problem, isolated mostly to Moscow that doesn't affect 98-99% of the pop.--Miyokan (talk) 14:42, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do know how to read Russian. I read the whole article.--Natl1 (Talk Page) (Contribs) 15:26, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation accepted

A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party has been accepted.
You can find more information on the case subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Russia.

For the Mediation Committee, Daniel (talk) 02:40, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management.
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

Hey there. Please poke me via e-mail when you're back from your holiday so we can commence this mediation. Thanks. —Sean Whitton / 10:38, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Norman photo

Was taken from his portrait at Minden, LA, City Hall.Billy Hathorn (talk) 22:08, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AFC proposal

	WikiProject Articles for Creation needs your input!
	I have made a detailed proposal for a new entry process for WP:AFC. As you were involved in the discussion after the last trial, I particularly invite your comments at the page WT:WikiProject Articles for creation/Proposed new entry process#Modifications and proposal for new trial. Thanks! MSGJ 09:57, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How can I get Mark Cerney's image added see below

[edit] ", "Image:Mark Cerney.jpg". Desired filename: ", "Mark Cerney.jpg".

Image description: ", "Mark Cerney (left) and South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford (right)."

Image source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/28758798@N06/2682137081/

Image license: CC-BY Mary Harper feel free to use this photo as I share it with the public. 072008

Article to be used on: Mark Cerney

Reason for upload: Article missing image

24.211.51.64 (talk) 23:04, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

To have your photo uploaded log in to Flickr and go to http://flickr.com/account/prefs/license/batch/ , select Attribution Creative Commons and click save license. After you do this, I will be able to upload you photo. Thanks.--Natl1 (Talk Page) (Contribs) 11:22, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Cerney image

I have made the license change to Mark Cerney photo.

Desired filename: ", "Mark Cerney.jpg".

Image description: ", "Mark Cerney (left) and South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford (right)."

Image source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/28758798@N06/2682137081/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.211.50.44 (talk) 13:15, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have uploaded your image. Please find it at Image:Mark Cerney and Mark Sanford.jpg.--Natl1 (Talk Page) (Contribs) 13:28, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which did not succeed with 47 support, 21 oppose, and 1 neutral. I appreciate both the supports and the opposes. Thanks again and cheers! TN‑X-Man 18:27, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a count of (166/43/7). I appreciate your comments and in my actions as an administrator I will endeavor to maintain the trust you have placed in me. I am honored by your trust and your support. Thank you, Cirt (talk) 02:01, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:FortalezaEsporteClubeEscudo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:FortalezaEsporteClubeEscudo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:31, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:IFU

Hi. Because you've spent a lot of work (and time) on IfU I thought I should consult you about proposed changes to the requesting system. I've been working on a new wizard and I just want to make sure that it includes the work you've put into the current wizard, to make sure we're not loosing anything. The wizard (still a WIP) is here and the discussion is over here. Thanks, Matt (Talk) 04:32, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Frazzcomic (Frazz himself).jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Frazzcomic (Frazz himself).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:19, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IfU

If you don't mind, could you add {{WPAFC}} to File talk pages? By the way, the AfC submission system that you helped to develop is still working really well. Martin^msgj 22:40, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Kingkrool.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Kingkrool.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:18, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Malouin.jpg

File:Malouin.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Malouin.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Malouin.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:52, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ping

You have mail. Them From Space 20:25, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't replied to me yet. Please do so in the next few days. Them From Space 20:29, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll resend my email. Check your inbox. Them From Space 04:29, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of London Buses route 77

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is London Buses route 77. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Buses route 77. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Voice123.com

A tag has been placed on Voice123.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Russavia ^{I'm chanting as we speak} 01:46, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Voice123 logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Voice123 logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:29, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Submisions/Entry 101

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mhiji 20:56, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Submisions/Entry 102

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mhiji 20:56, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Submisions/Entry 105

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mhiji 20:56, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you can you please join my group please

	Thank you can you please join my group please
	Thanks for doing that thing on the changers page I want to ask you to join the group we don't have any other members besides me GH200 so could you just please go to the page edit it and put yourself in there as a member and a nickname and look at the to do list and leave a message on my talk page please and thank you. GH200 (talk) 16:45, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, Selinsgrove Area Intermediate School, has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Selinsgrove Area Intermediate School" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 22:44, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Link-interwiki

Template:Link-interwiki has been nominated for merging with Template:Ill. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Jamesmcmahon0 (talk) 15:57, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Rubens Banqueting House.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rubens Banqueting House.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:07, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Anton Eiselsberg.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Anton Eiselsberg.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:11, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit the HealthPartners logo on Wikipedia please

Hi Natl1 could you please remove the old snowflake HealthPartners logo from the HealthPartners page on Wikipedia and replace it with the new HealthPartners logo? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:2:5C00:50A:C47B:776C:DB19:E25A (talk) 04:21, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:AfC preload

Template:AfC preload has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:28, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Mignault.jpg

The file File:Mignault.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Tridge Studios — Preceding unsigned comment added by Castroid (talk • contribs) 10:35, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:NewRFAStart

Template:NewRFAStart has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:24, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"OSCARS®" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect OSCARS® and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 15#OSCARS® until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BD2412 T 04:34, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paul Lindquist for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Lindquist is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Lindquist until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thebiguglyalien (talk) 15:29, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]