User talk:Simon Cheakkanal
Hi
[edit]I guessed it.Btw I know Omallor and Cheakkanal too. I stayed at Kaipattor , Omallor and Nariyapuram area for almost 12 years till 2003. Why I had asked you not to interfere in the discussion of the Fr. Thomas kuzhinapurath article , as you dont have a long track record in Wikipedia in your this id, it will only back fire. Anyways Have a nice time in Wikipedia.
- Tinucherian (talk) 08:10, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]Thanks for your kind words. - Tinucherian (talk) 08:46, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi
[edit]I see you are trying to add the image to the page ...
i will help you add it http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Climis.gif - Tinucherian (talk) 10:37, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- Done now. Check the page ?
- - Tinucherian (talk) 10:38, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Now go to http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:Climis.gif&action=edit and paste this
{{Information |Description= Moran Mor Baselios Cleemis |Source=self-made |Date= 22/02/08 |Location= |Author=~~~ |other_versions= }} {{GFDL-no-disclaimers}}
and save the page !
- Tinucherian (talk) 10:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- I added the license tag for u . See Image:Climis.gif
- - Tinucherian (talk) 11:26, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Fr. Thomas
[edit]Since you commented I’m little keen of what is there in the text. If possible, you may send it to ...---Hope I’m not distressing you and your time. After sending it, please remind me here/my talk pg. Thanks. --Avinesh Jose T 09:00, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- Hi Simon, Please send me also the the scanned pages of Bhashathilakam to my id <mailid removed> - Tinucherian (talk) 04:27, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Welcome to Indian Christianity WikiProject
[edit]
|
Thanks
[edit]You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Welcome to Indian Christianity WikiProject
[edit]I know this information is redundant. But let me officially welcome you to the project- Tinucherian (talk) 14:38, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
|
Congratulations on your efforts. Fr. Thomas Kuzhinapurath article survived AFD and the decision was to Keep. - Tinucherian (talk) 02:57, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Uploading Image to Wiki
[edit]You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Itz working now
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Portal:Indian Christianity Launched
[edit]We are happy to announce the launch of Portal:Indian Christianity by Wikipedia:WikiProject Indian Christianity , a work force of Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity and Wikipedia:WikiProject India. Please share your comments and suggestions. - Tinucherian (talk) 17:19, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Regarding your articles and images
[edit]Please dont copy paste articles directly from the websites. Write it in your words. Besides Please remember to select the correct licensing dropdown box when uploading pictures. Otherwise they may be deleted soon. Please take extreme care for this. - Tinucherian (talk) 04:36, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Copyright problems
[edit]
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Climis.gif, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. As a copyright violation, Image:Climis.gif appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Climis.gif has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Climis.gif]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Climis.gif]] with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Climis.gif]].
However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Whpq (talk) 15:56, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Changes to Indian Christianity Wikiproject/workgroup
[edit]Upon discussion and consensus ( see here) , The following changes and decisions were taken w.r.t to Indian Christianity workgroup :-
- The scope of workgroup will be limited to Indian region only for now.
- The workgroup will be renamed to Christianity in India instead of Indian Christianity.
- The changes will effect the project pages, Portal and the templates.
- The templetes will be replaced by a Indian map instead of Tricolor flag picture.
This is FYI - Tinucherian (talk) 04:47, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello Simon Cheakkanal!
| You are cordially invited to participate in WikiProject Christianity
The goal of WikiProject Christianity is to improve the quality and quantity of information about Christianity available on Wikipedia. WP:X as a group does not prefer any particular tradition or denominination of Christianity, but prefers that all Christian traditions are fairly and accurately represented. |
|
You are receiving this invitation because you are a member of one of the related Christianity Projects and I thought that you might be interested in this project also - Tinucherian (talk) 06:26, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Daivajanam.jpg
[edit]
Hi Simon Cheakkanal!
We thank you for uploading Image:Daivajanam.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 17:26, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
image copyright problem
[edit]hello simon, Just add PD-self inside {{}},and paste it in the edit page of the picture.This makes the picture public,and thus removes all copyright problems.Arun V Roy (talk) 16:02, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Reply
[edit]See the last item on the left hand column when you're at that page, and read Wikipedia:InterWikimedia links. --Relata refero (disp.) 04:56, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Prathapachandran, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.indiaglitz.com/channels/kannada/article/11998.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:51, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Image:Fr.John.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Fr.John.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:57, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Copyright problems
[edit]
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Malankara Catholic Association, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.malankara.net/associations.php?id=58&subid=60,
2=http://www.mca.net.in/constitution.html. As a copyright violation, Malankara Catholic Association appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Malankara Catholic Association has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Malankara Catholic Association and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Malankara Catholic Association with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Malankara Catholic Association.
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 15:10, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Copyright problems
[edit]Hello. Concerning your contribution, Malankara Catholic Association, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.mca.net.in/about.html, http://www.bathery.org/departments/m-c-a.html. As a copyright violation, Malankara Catholic Association appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Malankara Catholic Association has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Malankara Catholic Association and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Malankara Catholic Association with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Malankara Catholic Association.
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 14:20, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Samuel Rayan, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://ncronline.org/NCR_Online/archives2/2000b/051200/051200o.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:02, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
New Section
[edit]new section —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.68.80.231 (talk) 13:16, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Samuel rayan
[edit]A tag has been placed on Samuel rayan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. JD554 (talk) 09:03, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello Simon
[edit]I see you are having trouble with the copyright on the MCA details taken from the website of mca.net.in ? please let me know if you need any information from the following malankara sites - syromalankara.org, mca.net.in, bo-dhi.org, mavelikkaradiocese.org, bathery.org, bethanyashram.org, bvppune.org and the 2 future sites - mccetri.org and malankarauae.net. Except the first site, which is my personal endeavour, the rest are all official websites of the Syro Malankara Catholic Church, and I am the webmaster for all of them. Looking forward to hear from you! PS: out of curiosity! are you by any chance Fr. Thomas Kuzhinapurath under the current pseudonym? By your interests in the pages - Thomas Kuzhinapurath, Salvific Law, Daivajanam and Omallur, made me think so! If so, then you definitely don't need my help! :) Mirage221 (talk) 00:16, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Reading Malayalam
[edit]I have downloaded and installed AnjaliOldLipi font on my system. There is no issue in reading Mal fonts. I think you can read Mal evenif AnjaliOldLipi is not installed. MS Windows uses Kartika font, with which you can read Mal fonts. -- Sreejith Kumar (talk) 07:48, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
- Hi Simon, please read this http://malayalam-blogs.blogspot.com/ -- Sreejith Kumar (talk) 05:33, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Paulose Mar Gregorios, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.angelfire.com/folk/gregorians_muscat/BishopPaulose.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:20, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
I have had to strip this article down; please be aware of our WP:NPOV policy. Thanks, Marasmusine (talk) 10:19, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Aero Controls Inc.
[edit]A tag has been placed on Aero Controls Inc., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 10:50, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of John Titus Aero Controls
[edit]A tag has been placed on John Titus Aero Controls requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 16:08, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Aero Controls Inc.
[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Aero Controls Inc., suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Alexf(talk) 19:59, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
Image permission problem with Image:Aerocontrolslogo.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Aerocontrolslogo.jpg. I noticed that that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 20:45, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Image source problem with Image:Aerocontrols.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Aerocontrols.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:47, 18 October 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 20:47, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Image permission problem with Image:Aerocontrols.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Aerocontrols.jpg. I noticed that that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 08:44, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Kuzhinapurath Family
[edit]I have nominated Kuzhinapurath Family, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuzhinapurath Family. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Doug Weller (talk) 14:49, 20 October 2008 (UTC) Doug Weller (talk) 14:49, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Salvific Law
[edit]I have nominated Salvific Law, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salvific Law. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Cameron Scott (talk) 14:01, 21 October 2008 (UTC) Cameron Scott (talk) 14:01, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Kuzhinapurath Family
[edit]I have nominated Kuzhinapurath Family, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuzhinapurath Family (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Cameron Scott (talk) 14:15, 21 October 2008 (UTC) Cameron Scott (talk) 14:15, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Image
[edit]You took this picture yourself? because it looks like an official photo to me. --Cameron Scott (talk) 16:23, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
- then you have to change the licence, you are currently asserting ownership of something that is not yours. I will check and see what licence it needs to be released under. --Cameron Scott (talk) 16:57, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
finding references
[edit]For the people in this church, you yourself will have to find references. What is really needed is two or more published books, in full bibliographic format, with a listing of reviews of them from some published source. It can be a denominational source, but if there are reviews its much easier to show them notable. English preferred, but not required. If not, give a translation of some key phrases. if print, give a quote of some, in the original and english. Then look for papers they have written,and list all of them (if over 10 , select) , in full bibliographic format, a for an academic paper. And if at all possible 3rd party independent reliable published sources, print or online (but not blogs or press releases) talking about them. Even denominational newsletters will do. DGG (talk) 14:16, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Using KEEP or DELETE at afd
[edit]You only get to add KEEP or DELETE once in an AFD discussion, you can comment as much as you like but you do not put Keep or delete at the front of additional statements. --Cameron Scott (talk) 12:09, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
Please cite the original source of Image:Five Pillars.jpg. The license is incorrect unless you have taken the photograph yourself. --Jacob.jose (talk) 00:34, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
- Please change to {{PD-India}} license for the above image -- Tinu Cherian - 12:09, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Image:News_1.JPG listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:News_1.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 00:42, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
Fr.John.jpg
[edit]Image:Fr.John.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Fr.John.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Springnuts (talk) 10:12, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
Servant of god
[edit]His legal name was "servant of god"? because I find that hard to believe. We don't use any of the religious terms - so the pope's article is not "his holiness" and the like. --Cameron Scott (talk) 16:37, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Alexander Jacob IPS
[edit]An article that you have been involved in editing, Alexander Jacob IPS, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Jacob IPS. Thank you. Springnuts (talk) 12:34, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Geevarghese Mar Divannasios
[edit]A tag has been placed on Geevarghese Mar Divannasios requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bongomatic 04:28, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Your image uploads
[edit]It appears that many of the images you have uploaded as your own work have in fact been taken from other websites. Please do not upload any more images until you have become familiar with the image use policy. Stifle (talk) 14:38, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:SMCC Emblem.jpg
[edit]An image that you uploaded or altered, File:SMCC Emblem.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 14:38, 13 February 2009 (UTC) --Stifle (talk) 14:38, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:K V Kamath.jpg
[edit]An image that you uploaded or altered, File:K V Kamath.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 14:40, 13 February 2009 (UTC) --Stifle (talk) 14:40, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of File:BaseliFinal.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:BaseliFinal.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:File:BaseliFinal.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Rockfang (talk) 20:32, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Christian Leaders.jpg
[edit]An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Christian Leaders.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 20:36, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit]
Hello Simon Cheakkanal! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 709 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Yoohanon Mar Chrysostom - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:07, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Ichthus: January 2012
[edit] |
ICHTHUS |
| January 2012 |
In this issue...
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here
File:Alexanderjacob.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alexanderjacob.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 17:30, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
File:Daivajanam.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Daivajanam.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 20:40, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
The file File:Pastoral.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
orphaned personal image, no foreseeable use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:36, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
The file File:Book Release.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
orphaned personal image, no foreseeable use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:37, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
File:Reggio emilia.jpg listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Reggio emilia.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 12:21, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Samuel Rayan for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samuel Rayan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel Rayan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:28, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Salvificlaw.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
The file File:Johnfaris.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Abraham Julios for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abraham Julios, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abraham Julios until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Thomas Koorilos for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas Koorilos, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Koorilos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)