Ministry of Mines (India)
|This article is part of a series on the
politics and government of
The Ministry of Mines, a branch of the Government of India, is the apex body for formulation and administration of the rules and regulations and laws relating to mines in India. The head of the ministry is Dinsha Patel since 28 Oct 2012.
The Ministry of Mines is responsible for survey and exploration of all minerals, (other than natural gas and petroleum) for mining and metallurgy of non-ferrous metals like aluminium, copper, zinc, lead, gold, nickel etc. and for administration of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (MMDR Act) in respect of all mines and minerals other than coal and lignite. The subject of ‘mineral regulation and development’ occurs at S.No. 23 of the State list in the VIIth schedule to the Constitution. However the Constitution circumscribes this power, by giving Parliament the power under S.No. 54 of the Central list in the VIIth schedule, to enact legislation, and to this extent the States will be bound by the Central legislation. The Mines and Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act 1957 is the main Central legislation in force for the sector. The Act was enacted when the Industrial Policy Resolution 1957 was the guiding policy for the sector, and thus was aimed primarily at providing a mineral concession regime in the context of the metal making public sector undertakings. After the liberalization in 1991, a separate National Mineral Policy was promulgated in 1993 which set out the role of the private sector in exploration and mining and the MMDR Act was amended several times to provide for a reasonable concession regime to attract the private sector investment including FDI, into exploration and mining in accordance with NMP 1993.
The first National Mineral Policy(NMP) was enunciated by the Government in 1993 for liberalization of the mining sector. The National Mineral Policy, 1993 aimed at encouraging the flow of private investment and introduction of state-of-the-art technology in exploration and mining. Although the liberalisation of the mineral sector is now over a decade old, the results have not been encouraging. In the Mid-Term Appraisal of the Tenth Five-Year Plan, it was observed that the main factors responsible for this were procedural delays in the processing of applications for mineral concessions and the absence of adequate infrastructure in the mining areas. To go into the whole gamut of issues relating to the development of the mineral sector and suggest measures for improving the investment climate the Mid-Term Appraisal had proposed the establishment of a High Level Committee. Accordingly, the Government of India, Planning Commission, constituted a Committee on 14 September 2005. under the Chairmanship of Shri Anwarul Hoda, Member, Planning Commission .The Committee made detailed recommendations on all of its terms of Reference in December 2006 .Based on the recommendations of the High Level Committee, in consultation with State Governments, the Government replaced the National Mineral Policy, 1993 with a new National Mineral Policy on the 13th March, 2008. The National Mineral Policy 2008 provides for a change in the role of the Central Government and the State Governments to incentivize private sector investment in exploration and mining and for ensuring level playing field and transparency in the grant of concessions and promotion of scientific mining within a sustainable development framework so as to protect the interest of local population in mining areas. This has necessitated harmonization of legislation with the new National Mineral Policy.
The Hoda Committee studied the various reports prepared and submitted by study groups and in- house committees set up by various Ministries from time to time on the issues before the Committee. The Committee gave consideration to the mineral policies of the States as presented by the State Governments, especially to the differing perceptions of mineral-rich and non mineral-rich states. The Committee also gave consideration to the papers prepared by FIMI, which provided comparative analyses of the mineral policies and statutes of other major mineral producing countries in the world such as Australia, Canada, Chile, and South Africa,the changes in these policies and statutes over time, and the lessons that could be drawn from them. In the Committee, there was a strong sense that the NMP would have to be revised to attune it to the current realities in the world economy in which barriers to international trade and investment flows have been rapidly dismantled. The policy would have to provide for the mining laws and practices to evolve in order to adapt to international best practices. While the GSI and MECL need to be strengthened to enlarge their activities using state-of-the-art techniques, much of the investment needed for exploration and mining would have to come from the private sector. To induce investment flows, the policy environment would have to change. The procedures for grant of RP/LAPL/PL/ML would need to be made seamless and the holders of these permits and licences accorded security of tenure. The policy should also envisage unbundling of reconnaissance, prospecting, and mining activities to maximise private investment. The policy would have to require an arm’s length to be maintained between the State as a regulator and the State as a commercial entity engaged in mining activities. While enacting legislation and drawing up rules and guidelines the States should ensure harmony with Central laws and national policy. The policy should provide for disposal of fully prospected ore bodies through public tender/auction to the extent possible. Equally importantly, the Policy should provide for environmental concerns and the needs of local communities to be fully taken into account in mining operations.The Committee made detailed recommendations on all of its terms of Reference in December 2006 .Based on the recommendations of the High Level Committee, in consultation with State Governments, the Government replaced the National Mineral Policy, 1993 with a new National Mineral Policy on the 13th March, 2008.
The Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 was enacted so as to provide for the regulation of mines and development of minerals under the control of the Union. The Act has been amended in 1972, 1986, 1994 and 1999 in keeping with changes in the policy on mineral development.
Since that the existing law had already been amended several times and as further amendments may not clearly reflect the objects and reasons emanating from the new Mineral Policy, Government decided to reformulate the legislative framework in the light of the National Mineral Policy, 2008 and consequently, the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation ) Bill was drafted in 2009-10 by the then Secretary Mines, Mr S.Vijay Kumar  in consultation with the stakeholders. Government then constituted a Group of Minsters, chaired by the Minister of Finance ( comprising Ministers of Home, Environment & Forest, Mines, Steel, Coal, Tribal Affairs, Law etc.) which harmonized the views of the Ministries and the final draft, approved by the Cabinet in September 2011, was introduced in Parliament in November 2011.The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Bill, 2011, inter-alia, provides for the following, namely:- (a) a simple and transparent mechanism with clear and enforceable timelines for grant of mining lease or prospecting licence through competitive bidding in areas of known mineralization, and on the basis of first-in-time in areas where mineralization is not known, (b) “Extension” rather than “renewal” of concession to ensure complete exploitation of mineral deposit; (c) facilitating easy transfer of reconnaissance and prospecting licences; ) Mining leases are also transferable but subject to prior approval of State Government. (d) enabling induction of advanced and sophisticated technologies, particularly for exploration of deep-seated and concealed mineral deposits, particularly of metals in short supply through a new concession to be called High technology reconnaissance cum exploration licence(HTREL), (e) setting up a regulatory system that enables the Central Government to promote scientific mineral development, through Mining Plans and Mine Closure Plans enforced by a central technical agency, the Indian Bureau of Mines, as well as by Regulatory Authorities, (f) enabling levy and collection of cess by Central Government and State Government, and setting up of Mineral Funds at National and State level for funding the activities pertaining to capacity building of regulatory bodies like Indian Bureau of Mines, State Mining and Geology Directorates, and for R&D and computerization; (g) creation of a new revenue stream from extraction of minerals to directly fund a Trust in each District, to be called the District Mineral Foundation for the purposes of creating, managing and maintaining local socio-economic infrastructure in the mining areas and providing for recurring payments to those affected by mining related operations; (h) enabling reservation of mineral bearing areas for the purpose of conservation of minerals, and ban or restrictions on the grant of concessions in respect of any mineral or grade of mineral of strategic value ; (i) enabling the registered co-operatives for obtaining mineral concessions on small deposits in order to encourage tribals and small miners to enter into mining activities; (j) empowering the Central Government to institutionalize a statutory mechanism for ensuring sustainable mining with adequate concerns for environment and socio-economic issues in the mining areas, through a National Sustainable Development Framework ; (k) setting up independent regulatory mechanism through the National Mining Regulatory Authority to advise Government on rates of royalty, dead rent, benefit sharing with District Mineral Foundation, quality standards, and also conduct investigation and launch prosecution in cases of large scale illegal mining; (l) providing for levy of concessional or moderated rates of royalty where mineral beneficiation is done at ore stage or to support mining investment in remote areas or for induction of special technology or to produce downstream products of strategic value or to create infrastructure; (m) setting up of a National Mining Tribunal and State Mining Tribunals for redressal of grievances against orders of Central Government or State Government, as the case may be, and in cases of delays in grant of mineral concessions; (n) empowering the State Governments to set up Special Courts for speedy prosecution of offences relating to illegal mining, and to provide stringent punishments for contravention of certain provisions of the proposed legislation; (o) empowering the State Governments to debar a person convicted for illegal mining from obtaining concessions in future to cancel existing concessions in his favour, to disincentivise illegal mining; (p) empowering the Central Government to intervene in the cases of illegal mining where the concerned State Government fails to take action against illegal mining; (q) lapsing of all applications for grant of mineral concession pending on the date of commencement of the new MMDR Bill, excepting those that have been made for seamless transition to next stage of concession or those which have been given prior approval for grant of concession or issued letter of intent and are awaiting execution of lease or licence.
A notable feature of the Bill is to provide a simple mechanism which ensures that revenues from mining are shared with local communities at individual as well as community level so as to empower them, provide them with choices, enable them to create and maintain local infrastructure and better utilize infrastructure and other services provided for their benefit. The Bill after introduction in Parliament in November 2011, was referred to the Department–related Parliamentary Standing Committee (“Standing Committee” ) which after eliciting the views of all stakeholders, has submitted its Report.
Mining within a sustainable development framework
The Hoda Committee made important recommendations on the need for a Sustainable Development Framework(SDF), as follows:
“”The Ministry of Mines and MOEF should jointly set up a working group to prepare a SDF specially tailored to the context of India’s mining environment, taking fully into account the work done and being done in ICMM and the IUCN. The Indian SDF comprising of principles, reporting initiatives, and good practice guidelines unique to the three sectors in Indian mining, i.e. SME, captive, and large stand alone, can then be made applicable to mining operations in India and a separate structure set up to ensure adherence to such framework, drawing from both IBM and the field formations of MOEF. • The aspect of social infrastructure in the form of schools, hospitals, drinking water arrangements, etc. needs to be addressed within a formalised framework on the lines of the ICMM model. The Samatha ruling requiring mining companies to spend a set percentage of their profits on model programmes for meeting local needs through a pre-determined commitment, is one option for the country as a whole. Another option could be to require the mining companies to spend a percentage, say three per cent, of their turnover on the social infrastructure in the villages around the mining area. The working group mentioned in paragraph 3.11 may take this into consideration when preparing the Indian SDF and determine the percentage that mining companies could be advised to set aside. “
Based on on these recommendations, the National Mineral Policy 2008 explicitly underlined the need for mining within a sustainable development framework. The National Mineral Policy 2008 states, ( para numbers in brackets are the para numbers in the Policy): ” (2.3) A framework of sustainable development will be designed which takes care of biodiversity issues and to ensure that mining activity takes place along with suitable measures for restoration of the ecological balance”…
In para 7.10 it states” Extraction of minerals closely impacts other natural resources like land, water, air and forest. The areas in which minerals occur often have other resources presenting a choice of utilisation of the resources. Some such areas are ecologically fragile and some are biologically rich. It is necessary to take a comprehensive view to facilitate the choice or order of land use keeping in view the needs of development as well as the needs of protecting the forests, environment and ecology…….All mining shall be undertaken within the parameters of a comprehensive Sustainable Development Framework… Mining operations shall not ordinarily be taken up in identified ecologically fragile areas and biologically rich areas.
Para 7.11 states that “..Appropriate compensation will form an important aspect of the Sustainable Development Framework mentioned in para 2.3 and 7.10…..”
Para 7.12 states that..:”Once the process of economical extraction of a mine is complete there is need for scientific mine closure which will not only restore ecology and regenerate biomass but also take into account the socio-economic aspects of such closure.”..
And not least, para 3.2 of the Policy states that “The Central Govt in consultation with the State Govts shall formulate the legal measures for giving effect to the NMP 2008..The MMDR Act, MCR and MCDR will be amended in line with the policy…”
In line with the Hoda Committee recommendations, the Ministry of Mines commissioned ERM which prepared a Sustainable Development Framework Report in November 2011, for which the new MMDR Bill 2011 will provide statutory backing. The Ministry also set up a Steering Committee which comprised representatives from The Ministries of Mines, Environment &Forest and Tribal Affairs and also FIMI and 3 State Govts. In the Framework, “mining within a Sustainable Development Framework” is defined as mining that :
- Is financially viable
- Is socially responsible;
- is environmentally, technically and scientifically sound
- takes a long term view of development
- uses mineral resources optimally
- ensures sustainable post-closure land uses.
Also one based on creating long-term, genuine, mutually beneficial partnerships between government, communities and miners, based on integrity, cooperation and transparency.
Following the ICMM approach, the Framework recognises 7 Principles as defining the Framework:
- Incorporate environmental and social sensitivities in decisions on leases
- Undertake strategic assessment of key Mining Regions at periodic intervals
- Manage impacts at the mine level through sound management systems
- Address land, R&R and other social impacts upfront
- Promote community engagement, benefit sharing and contribution to socio-economic development
- Ensure orderly mine closure planning and implementation and post-closure activities
- Put in place systems for assurance and credible reporting
The MMDR Bill 2011 has the following provisions to provide legal backing for the SDF:
The Bill specifies that the Mining Plan will be prepared within the Sustainable Development Framework (SDF) and have attached to it a Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) document giving the proposed annual expenditure on socio-economic activities in the Panchayats adjoining the lease area (Section 26). While the CSR itself will remain voluntary, the Act mandates that both the CSR plan and the actual CSR work done should be probably disclosed in a standard manner.
Similarly, the Bill specifies that the Mine Closure Plans with be prepared in terms of the SDF (Section 32). The Mine Closure Plan consists of two components. The first is a progressive mine closure plan, prepared for each five year period, to ensure that restoration work at the mine site takes place side by side with mining activities in a planned and systematic way, and everything is not left for the last. The progressive mine closure plans have to be disclosed to the Panchayats of the area and got approved after consultation with the Panchayats.
The second is the Final Mine Closure Plan, updated in draft form through the life of the mine after deciding on the post-mining land use in consultation with the Panchayats. The Plan is finalized and approved for the last five years of the mine and executed. The lessee has to obtain a certificate that the protective, reclamation, restoration and rehabilitation work has been completed in accordance with the approved plan (Section 32 and 33).
The Bill also directly promotes more sustainable mining in the following ways:-
- Providing for systematic augmentation of mineral resources through GSI’s survey and exploration and integration of data arising from private exploration work (Section 4).
- Allowing transfers and amalgamation of mines to promote better utilization of the ore body (Section 7(4)).
- Concessional royalty for mineral beneficiation at ore stage (Section 41).
- Mining Plan to include scientific methods of mining, beneficiation and economic utilization (Section 26).
Public Sector Undertakings
- National Aluminium Company Limited (NALCO), Bhubaneswar
- Hindustan Copper Limited (HCL), Kolkata
- Mineral Exploration Corporation Limited (MECL), Nagpur
- Kolar Gold Fields, Karnataka
- Jawaharlal Nehru Aluminium Research Development and Design Centre (JNARDDC), Nagpur
- National Institute of Rock Mechanics (NIRM), Kolar
- National Institute of Miners’ Health (NIMH), Nagpur
- Non-Ferrous Technology Development Centre
- Centre for Techno Economic Mineral Policy Options (C-TEMPO)
- narendra singh tomar - 27 May 2014-present
Ministers of state
- vishnu deo sai - 27 May 2014-present
This is the list of Secretaries to Government of India.
Mining Policy of the Ministry: . The subject of ‘mineral regulation and development’ occurs at S.No. 23 of the State list in the VIIth schedule to the Constitution. However the Constitution circumscribes this power, by giving Parliament the power under S.No. 54 of the Central list in the VIIth schedule, to enact legislation, and to this extent the States will be bound by the Central legislation. The Mines and Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act 1957 is the main Central legislation in force for the sector. The Act was enacted when the Industrial Policy Resolution 1957 was the guiding policy for the sector, and thus was aimed primarily at providing a mineral concession regime in the context of the metal making public sector undertakings. After the liberalization in 1991, a separate National Mineral Policy was promulgated in 1993 which set out the role of the private sector in exploration and mining and the MMDR Act was amended several times to provide for a reasonable concession regime to attract the private sector investment including FDI, into exploration and mining in accordance with NMP 1993.