User talk:Kmicic

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Kmicic, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Edward Rastawiecki have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  –Dream out loud (talk) 19:22, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will add some sources. Kmicic (talk) 19:24, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA request[edit]

I'd like to invite you to use our Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland, and post your request on our talk. As the first stage, we can review it for B-class, and once it passes our B-class criteria, we can work on getting it to GA level. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 20:35, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for expanding this article. I left comments on WT:POLAND and article's talk page, and I'll be looking forward to more of your expansion. Try to work on irregular verbs, though, and install an English spellchecker in your browser (my Mozilla supports Polish, English and French :D). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 00:35, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Monitor. WikiProject Poland Newsletter: Issue 1 (April 2011)[edit]

WikiProject Poland Newsletter • April 2011
For our freedom and yours

Welcome to our first issue of WikiProject Poland newsletter, the Monitor (named after the first Polish newspaper).

Our Project has been operational since 1 June, 2005, and also serves as the Poland-related Wikipedia notice board. I highly recommend watchlisting the Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland page, so you can be aware of the ongoing discussions. We hope you will join us in them, if you haven't done so already! Unlike many other WikiProjects, we are quite active; in this year alone about 40 threads have been started on our discussion page, and we do a pretty good job at answering all issues raised.

In addition to a lively encyclopedic, Poland-related, English-language discussion forum, we have numerous useful tools that can be of use to you - and that you could help us maintain and develop:

This is not all; on our page you can find a list of useful templates (including userboxes), awards and other tools!

With all that said, how about you join our discussions at WT:POLAND? Surely, there must be something you could help others with, or perhaps you are in need of assistance yourself?

You have received this newsletter because you are listed as a [member link] at WikiProject Poland. • Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 21:11, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 21:18, 25 April 2011 (UTC) [reply]

I've reviewed the article and left notes on the talk page. I've put the nomination on hold for seven days to allow the issues to be addressed. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, here, or on the article talk page with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:52, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on your first GA! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 18:21, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you create well-referenced, beyond-the-stub articles like Stefan Kunicki, please nominate them for front-page exposure at T:TDYK. Sadly, deadline for Stefan Kunicki has already passed :( --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 18:20, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Grzegorz Lach has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. joe deckertalk to me 04:46, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain on talk what makes it notable. Better yet, advertise the discussion at WT:POLAND. At this point I don't see how they differ from tens of thousands of small and unnotable noble families, and I do not recognize simply being a noble family mentioned in a few herbarze notable. You are welcome to convince me otherwise, but preferably, please show notability. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 00:23, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In Justynian Szczytt (d. 1677), you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Kazimierz Jan Sapieha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, if you have them, I'll take them. Maybe we could get the article to GA, would you be interested in helping with that? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 20:20, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will, but I don't think I'll have time for HK till late January. For now, I have access to some other material I want to use to expand some other related articles. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 23:22, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Justynian Szczytt (d. 1677)[edit]

I'll review it shortly; could you add a review request to WT:POLAND, for records-keeping sake? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 22:35, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Exceptional Newcomer Award
For your WP:POLAND-related contributions. We hope you'll stick around! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 02:33, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Kmicic. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 21:33, 7 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hi. I tried to bring the prose up to good English. I hope I didn't change the meaning.

Things were unclear in a few places, so I left {{clarify}} tags. I'll write up a summary of my questions on the article's Talk page, so you can see what was unclear to me. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 19:37, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I left few minor comments. After you address them, the article will be B-class, and I'd recommend you submit it for a GA. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:14, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Invitation to diacritics guideline discussion at WT:BLP
Hi, you were one of 100+ Users who has commented on a living person Requested Move featuring diacritics (e.g. the é in Beyoncé Knowles) in the last 30 days. Following closure of Talk:Stephane Huet RM, a tightening of BLP guidelines is proposed. Your contribution is invited to WT:BLP to discuss drafting a proposal for tightening BLP accuracy guidelines for names. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:04, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to duplicate this invite on the pages of others who have commented, for or against. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:14, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We miss you![edit]

On behalf of WPPOLAND - we hope to see you back with us again one day! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 17:24, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Richeza, Queen of Hungary[edit]

Hello, My source for those dates was the corresponding Hungarian WP article. It has sources but they are not specific. I do not read Hungarian but perhaps one of the Hungarian users could help you verify the dates.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 17:01, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Justynian Szczytt (d. 1677), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kozłów and Sanniki (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion of interest[edit]

Perhaps you'd be interested in this. We have very few people who would be... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:08, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Polish Barnstar of National Merit, 2nd Class
For your constant work on Poland-related topics, I, Piotrus, present you with The Polish Barnstar of National Merit, 2nd Class, on behalf of WikiProject Poland. Keep up your good work! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:40, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
this WikiAward was given to Kmicic by Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here on 02:40, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Justynian Szczytt (d. 1677)[edit]

You used the wrong template. Good article reassessment is for articles that are already Good Articles and need to be assessed AGAIN to see if they still are GA-class. You want, I believe, a first time, regular assessment. See WP:GAR for a how-to. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:29, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gunzelin, Margrave of Meissen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry II (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Justynian Szczytt (d. 1677)[edit]

The article Justynian Szczytt (d. 1677) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Justynian Szczytt (d. 1677) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. – Quadell (talk) 18:54, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Poland Newsletter • January 2014 • Issue II[edit]

WikiProject Poland Newsletter • January 2014 • Issue II
For our freedom and yours

Welcome to the second issue of WikiProject Poland newsletter, the Monitor (named after the first Polish newspaper).

Our Project has been operational since 1 June, 2005, and also serves as the Poland-related Wikipedia notice board. I highly recommend watchlisting the Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland page, so you can be aware of the ongoing discussions. We hope you will join us in them, if you haven't done so already! Unlike many other WikiProjects, we are quite active; we get close to a hundred discussion threads each year and we do a pretty good job at answering all issues raised. Last year we were featured in the Signpost, and our interviewer was amazed at our activity. In the end, however, even as active as we are, we are just a tiny group - you can easily become one of our core members!

In addition to a lively encyclopedic, Poland-related, English-language discussion forum, we have numerous useful tools that can be of use to you - and that you could help us maintain and develop:

  • we have an active assessment department. As of now, our project has tagged almost 83,000 pages as Poland-related - that's an improvement of over 3,000 new pages since the last newsletter. Out of which 30 still need a quality assessment, and 2,000, importance assessment. We have done a lot to clear the backlog here (3 years ago those numbers were 1,500 and 20,000, respectively). Can you help assess a few pages?
    • assessing articles is as easy as filling in the class= and importance= parameters on the talk page in the {{WPPOLAND|class=|importance=}} template. See here for a how-to guide.
  • once an article has an assessment template, it will appear in our article alerts and news feed, which provides information on which Poland-related articles are considered for deletion, move, or are undergoing a Good or Featured review. Watchlisting that feed, in addition to watchlisting our project's main page, is a good way to make sure you stay up to date on most Poland-related discussions.
  • you can also see detailed deletion discussions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Poland (which is a good place to watchlist if you just want to stay up to date on possible deletions of Poland-related content)
  • we have also begun B-class quality reviews on our talk page, and if our activity increases, hopefully we will be able to institute our own A-class quality reviews. As of now, we have about 500 C-class articles in need of a B-class review. If you'd like to help with them, instructions for doing B-class reviews are to be found in point 10 of our assessment FAQ. In addition to this automated list, you are also encouraged to help review articles from our B-class reviews requested list found here.
  • also, those articles will be included in our cleanup listing, which allows us to see which top-importance articles are in need for attention, and so on. We have tens of thousands articles in need of cleanup there, so if you ever need something to do, just look at this gigantic list. (I am currently reviewing the articles tagged with notability, either proving them notable or nominating for deletion; there are still several dozens left if you want to help!).
  • did you know that newly created Poland-related articles are listed here. They need to be reviewed, often cleaned-up, occasionally nominated for deletion, and their creators may need to be welcomed and invited to our project if they show promise as new authors of Poland-related content.
  • we are maintaining a Portal:Poland
  • automated Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland/Popular pages lists the most popular Poland-related pages from the previous month(s)
  • Breaking news: we are looking for a Wikipedian in Residence for the New York City area. See Wikipedia:GLAM/Józef Piłsudski Institute of America for details.

This is not all; on our page you can find a list of useful templates (including userboxes), awards and other tools!


With all that said, how about you join our discussions at WT:POLAND? Surely, there must be something you could help others with, or perhaps you are in need of assistance yourself?

It took me three years to finish this issue. Feel free to help out getting the next one before 2017 by being more active in WikiProject management :)

You have received this newsletter because you are listed as a member at WikiProject Poland.
Please remove yourself from the mailing list to prevent receiving future mailings.
Newsletter prepared by Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here and sent by Technical 13 (talk) using the Mass message system.

Nomination of Jarosław Leitgeber for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jarosław Leitgeber is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jarosław Leitgeber until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 14:23, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Yaroslav Hrytsak has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Iryna Harpy (talk) 04:11, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have already added reliable sources. Kmicic (talk) 21:24, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Polish Biographical Dictionary may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ] 200, the third of volume 49, covers entries "[[Mieczysław Szumański|Szumański Mieczysław]] - [[Fryderyk Szwencki|Szwencki Fryderyk"[[.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:37, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Justynian Szczytt (d. 1677)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Justynian Szczytt (d. 1677) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3family6 -- 3family6 (talk) 03:23, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Justynian Szczytt (d. 1677)[edit]

The article Justynian Szczytt (d. 1677) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Justynian Szczytt (d. 1677) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3family6 -- 3family6 (talk) 19:01, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am afraid I am not an admin. You can ask Renata who deleted it, or another admin at WP:REFUND or such. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:24, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of most expensive Finnish films, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Talvisota and Tuntematon sotilas. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Manuela Hărăbor[edit]

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Kmicic, thanks for creating Manuela Hărăbor!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. .

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 23:20, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
For your continued edits to Wikipedia, I, Piotrus, award you the Original Barnstar. Keep up the good job! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:45, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you very much! :) Kmicic (talk) 19:12, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Adam Kysil was Ruthenian and Eastern Orthodox. Jakub Michałowski as every person is entitled to a mistake. In addition, the Polish historiography silent, for example, that Sobieski, Zolkiewski, Zamoyski family were Ruthenians (Polish: Rusini), as they say some Ukrainian researchers. Notice I did not rename the names of the Poles. Sorry for Google transl. Pozdrawiam!--Бучач-Львів (talk) 06:45, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In this art. only in name Kraków written in German. During 2g WWar oficial name of Kraków was Krakau. What do you think? Pozdrawiam.--Бучач-Львів (talk) 11:57, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Witaj! Please read. Thanks.--Бучач-Львів (talk) 13:44, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leontii Voitovych, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rus'. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:39, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring[edit]

Please be mindful of WP:3RR/WP:BRD at Kostiantyn Vasyl Ostrozky. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:47, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Name changes needed[edit]

I don't have time, but perhaps you will: look at Template:Grand Duchy of Lithuania nobility - you will see what I mean. Sigh. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:04, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Johann Anton Friedrich Baudri[edit]

Hello Kmicic,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Johann Anton Friedrich Baudri for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. —JAaron95 Talk 11:25, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Johann Anton Friedrich Baudri[edit]

Hello, Kmicic,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Johann Anton Friedrich Baudri should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johann Anton Friedrich Baudri .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 11:42, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kostiantyn Vasyl Ostrozky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turów. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for that entry. Perhaps you could stub it at pl wiki as well, at pl:Teodor Szybiłło? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:45, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Podziękowanie[edit]

Serdecznie dziękuję za słowa wsparcia. Wszystkiego dobrego. --Szczebrzeszynski (talk) 09:12, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages[edit]

Thank you for your recent articles, including Dominique Sourdel, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 22:52, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Pavla Vošahlíková[edit]

Hi, I'm Gorthian. Kmicic, thanks for creating Pavla Vošahlíková!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. You need to add some content that shows her notability to prevent the article being deleted.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. — Gorthian (talk) 21:43, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pavla Vošahlíková, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Czech. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Kmicic. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Kmicic. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]