User talk:68.39.174.238

Attention:

This IP address, 68.39.174.238, is registered to highly intelligent brain cells dedicated to fighting vandals and is shared by multiple brain cells. Comments left on this page may be received by other brain cells of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking.

If you are an unregistered brain cell operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your ganglion. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of your fingers that communicates between your brain cells and the Wikimedia servers. Such fingers are shared among a huge number of bodily usages compared to the number of brain cells using your particular ganglion. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself.

--Nlu (talk) 21:48, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Click here to force update / purge / reload this talk page

This IP address resolved to c-68-39-174-238.hsd1.nj.comcast.net as of 23 January 2007, 14:03 (UTC)

edit count | edit summary usage

And the point of that is?

And the point of that is? 68.39.174.238 02:50, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

That people keep wondering which ISP allows IPs to remain static for years? Flyingtoaster1337 08:28, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Comcaſt gives some degree of statisticity[sic] by mapping IPs to MAC addrs. Hence, by keeping the same MAC addr facing their DHCP svrs, I've been steadily assigned this IP addr for about 2 years. Prior to that I'd had some different routers with different IPs. Some of my contributions can be seen to articels like New City Village (Which are totall newbies). 68.39.174.238 22:19, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

I see nothing wrong with removing this box. The user that added it used an edit summary of ":P", and it is redundant to the whois links on the bottom. Regards, Tuxide 04:20, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

It's not annoying, it just didn't immediately make sense. 68.39.174.238 07:10, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

I've been assaulted (;D) with this box so you can add a new section

Joke Templates

68.39.174.238

Vandalism Fighter
Real Name:	Unknown.
Position:	Persistent.
Edits:	Well over 15000.
Wants a user page:	NO.
Asked to register:	Many, many times.
Asked to admin:	Many, many times.
Is a vandal:	No
Location:	New Jersey
First known edit:	26 September 2005
2005 Archives:	1 · 2
2006 Archives:	1 · 2
2007 Archives:	1 · 2

The template-message(s) below contain(s) material found amusing and is/are kept for that reason. They are NOT intended, nor should they be used, for any research or serious use.

Userboxes

21,000+This user has made more than 21,000 contributions to Wikipedia.

grrThis user does not want a userpage. If you create one he will gnaw on random limbs.

Note: In the event of persistent disregard for the law, like your neighbors displayed this year, AGAIN, the local authorities should do something, but are almost certain to not do so, unless their fireworks do something like start a fire.

This is your final warning. If your neighbors continue to shoot off fireworks next door, feloniously discharge weapons up or at things, including trashcans or rusting cars, or continue to engange in any other noxious effontery, as they did to attempt to "celebrate" the New Year, you will be exiled from New Jersey indefinitely.

To see old comments, please see "my" archives (1, 2, 3) ([Foul language]... obnoxious removal of old text... One of these days I'll revert them ALL!)

Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.

Nice job fighting vandalism... but

meh

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but you may wish to create a account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, including:

• The use of a username of your choice, provided that it is appropriate.
• The use of your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed.
• The ability to create new pages.
• The ability to rename pages.
• The ability to edit semi-protected pages.
• The ability to upload images.
• The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website.
• Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, make sure to sign and date your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You're great!

68.39.174.238, keep up the good work!

--sunstar net^talk 23:58, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Unusual edit

I don't follow this edit Raul654 01:10, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm sure it's because that's the page that WP:MH redirects to. Dekimasuよ! 12:59, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Your talk page is too long!

Hi 68.39.174.238. Unfortunately, your talk page is too long and some browsers may have difficulty rendering it. I suggest a user will archive this page for you. Thank you. Meteoroid 03:33, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Hey there. I'm awesome.

From what I have skimmed, people are asking you to get an account. Because I feel like it, I am asking that you never register. I love you. Chris Griswold (☎☓) 07:11, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Dear sir. I have gone to a lot of trouble helping a school who happen to like Wikipedia for references [I don't know why]. I have written and edited some articles for their website and used Wikipedia as a link for them. You claim. They are blatant copyright violations. Not so,belongs to them and me. That you claim to own the copyright to the material implies that you are associated with the institute, which is a clear conflict of interest. No more than I am associated with you. I have done this with my own free time but your objections are noted and since you are the one with a lot of free time trawling websites looking for articles to edit, then maybe you should do it for them. Yours disgusted.

Get an account!

Please get an account! Call it something like 6839.174comcast for example, that way you'll be able to do all the things you can't do as anon, which include:

• File uploads
• Move pages to new names (and revert pagemove vandalism, the scourge of Wikipedia...)
• Participate in Requests for adminship, and articles for deletion

Go ahead, do it soon!! you'll miss out... --sunstar net^talk 15:12, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Blocking discussion

You may want to comment on this thread on WP:AN where someone has proposed to have you blocked. Even community-banned and Arbcom-banned users get notified of discussions on whether they should be blocked, so I think not doing the same for you would be a tad discourteous. ;) Awyong J. M. Salleh 10:43, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

This has to be the first time it has ever been suggested someone be blocked to force them to register so they can be nominated for an adminship. Congratulations?--Isotope23 18:52, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

A well overdue award for the coolest and fun IP who should be needs to be an administrator!, I hereby award 68.39.174.238 with the “Cool Award.” Real96 20:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Apologize for the harassment, per the blocking discussion. You are an excellent editor to this project! Real96 20:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

• Note: discussion since archived to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive76#Blocking of Good User in Order to Get an Account. Cheers! bd2412 T 21:02, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits

LOL GOTCHA :D Anyway, just letting you know that Primetime has been taken care of now. Apologies for your inability to edit the Cplot page. Hope you're staying out of the drama! —Pilotguy go around 05:06, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

From what I have skimmed, people are asking you to get an account. Because I feel like it, I am asking that you never register. I love you. Chris Griswold (☎☓) 07:11, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm with Chris. I love you 2. Its cool you don't wanna sign in! But since i did I'll sign out too! allie_collegegirl21 03:12, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

user page recreated and redeleted

Hi - I just thought you might find the deletion log listing for your user page amusing. I'm not sure what the record is for most often deleted page, but I suspect your page is in the running. -- Rick Block (talk) 02:14, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

The weather in London has been deleted 71 times and now cannot be recreated (see Wikipedia:Protected titles/Deliberate redlinks). Your page has only been deleted 28 times, but unless it's added to the deliberate redlinks page (which seems improbable) will eventually overtake London's weather. -- Rick Block (talk) 04:46, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Please create an account to continue

Have you created your account yet? 68.111.92.229 19:40, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

The Barnstar of Anonymous Contribution

		The Barnstar of Anonymous Contribution
		As a fellow anonymous contributor, I hereby award you, the anonymous contributor(s) hailing from 68.39.174.238, with the Barnstar of Anonymous Contribution, for the unsung and thankless service you have rendered unto Wikipedia, in your countless minor edits and bigger contributions over time. They have made a difference in our community. Cheers! 68.111.92.229 20:46, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Re: No...

...I haven't. It looks like you went in the other direction ;) 68.39.174.238 23:44, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

The problem for IPs to become administrators is that IPs change periodically and admin privileges may not transfer from the old IP to the new IP. So it is not possible for you to become a "sysop anon". This is why you must create an account to correct this problem. 68.111.92.229 02:40, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Hughes Complex

Hey, your picture of the Hughes Complex has been nominated for featured picture status. The all-caps references are an inside joke (Mr. Treason was a vandal who once threatened to sue Wikipedia in that particular court). Cheers! bd2412 T 03:24, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

a —Preceding unsigned comment added by Weather Man (talk • contribs) 14:05, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Hiya

Hiya, you rock. I'm new, and I respect you Mr 68 39 174 238. --74.53.88.50 10:20, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Account creation

You should create a new account just in case someone uses this IP or IP range to vandalize. Amos Han ^Talk 10:22, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Pale blue dot

Pale blue dot is the name of a photo of planet Earth from deep space, taken because of Carl Sagan and is also the name of one of his books (not his best though). I liked the name so appropriated it as my username. Pale blue dot 20:17, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Userbox

Per your edit count. Real96 07:14, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

I am moving the userbox up. Real96 00:23, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

How do you edit semi-protected articles

???? Thanks Caglarkoca 23:56, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

I know that registered users can edit semiprotected pages; but without an account, how do you edit them? :)) Caglarkoca 23:16, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

the article mighy not be semi-protected at all 201.39.174.238

I award you a barnstar for being a helpful Wikipedia user.64.230.41.86 00:52, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

WOW!

		The Special Barnstar
		You are incredible. An anonymous editor, one of Wikipedia's best contributors. Props. Cheers, JetLover (Talk) (Sandbox) 22:47, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Help me please :'(

You know in the "Users who want <insert your IP adress here> to get an account" section? You know the little counter thingy that tells how many users want you to get an account? Can you tell me how to make my own? Tell me through my talk page pls, or anyone who reads this who knows what I can do, please tell me :(. Wikipeep 494 05:24, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

WP:SIGN

What is the point on insisting that people sign their comments if you yourself have nothing other than an IP address to identify yourself. Very hypocritical if you ask me. Cfpresley 18:33, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

what Ou-dis-sun means in By the Waters of Babylon

So that's what Ou-dis-sun means. IMO, however, these links are interpretion that doesn't really belong in the plot summary. It would, of course, be appropriate to explain the words you linked in the Analysis section. --Jtir 19:42, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Alaska Congressional Elections, 2006

The contradiction was that the Democratic and the Republican candidate was listed with exactly the same number of votes. I had some free time now (which I didn't at the time), so I got the right vote numbers and fixed it. Railwayman 21:02, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

The point

...for this? 68.39.174.238 22:50, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

I deleted that edit because it adds excess to excess, put all that information in a more readable format. If it's so interesting, then try making it more accessible. As it is - you can't really see the picture, the caption reads like a play in a play. Thanks Modernist 02:14, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

William Hogarth

This edit is OK, but I think it would be a lot better if you could work it into the "Other later works" section, with a brief description, especially since I don't think we have any other engravings prominently discussed. Cheers! Mdotley 01:08, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your work on Industry and Idleness. I add stub sections for the remaining prints; I hope that helps a little. I came here to encourage you to get an account, but I see that there's no need. I don't work those Hogarth articles enough to remember your IP address. Good show, carry on! Mdotley 20:26, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Wow! Well done.

Have you seen the work User:Yomangani did on articles like Four Times of the Day, Four Stages of Cruelty and The Gate of Calais?

A Harlot's Progress, A Rake's Progress and Marriage à-la-mode still need work. And we are missing The March to Finchley. -- !! ?? 12:25, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

George Warren

I removed the prod and added a sources; I'm not sure if the dates are correct but this person did exist as the article says he did. Salahx 20:52, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Kashiwazaki-Kariwa monitoring.jpg

Thanks for the help with that. I've re-uploaded it to Image:Kashiwazaki-Kariwa monitoring2.jpg. Feel free to follow my footsteps and check that everything was done right. -Theanphibian ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:50, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

And don't feel like you have to make an account! It forces people to respect IP edits!

Okay, you discussed a lot of things that I thought about when writing the fair-use rational, but I didn't want go too into depth about it, but there is certainly further discussion that can be had. In the article I mention that there is an apology saying basically "sorry our radiation detectors don't work because of the earthquake," so needless to say, that part should stay, as it's relevant content for the point that is being made. The left navigation is not 100% needed, but I also provide a link directly to the site itself right under the image. Anyway, I find that useful to be able to say:

• Here is the screen shot during the earthquake, let's go look at what it says now
• Oh, it gives radiation readings

Their site, however, is absolutely chock-full of cartoons explaining all about how radiation works and what not, very pretty, which is exactly what we must be sure to avoid. I'm sure they paid someone a lot of money to make those. So in terms of revisions to the image, we could

• Reduce resolution to the limit that the text is still readable or
• Cut off some of the pretty stuff on the side to the point that the material relevant to the event is still present. -Theanphibian ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:55, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Oh, another thing I forgot to ask: In order to give my permission for deleting something, can I just say that I give permission or do I have to go searching for some appropriate template? And regarding your last comments on the image, that's fine if you remove the left part, it's not a big deal. The point is that this is just one of many mistakes by the utility that added to the public's fears regarding the incident, nor did it help their credibility when asserting that there was no danger. Yes, one is still out, but you only need one in the fist place to answer the question "is there discernible radiation release from the plant?" I know this image doesn't contain much in terms of promotional artwork, I just meant to say that I was highly tempted to use some others ^^ -Theanphibian ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:35, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

The Communism Vandal

I know this is likely an old topic stuffed in the back of your mind, but you may wish to take a look at these edits by Aqui venho de novo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), a sockpuppet of Encyclopedist (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (a former user in good standing turned vandal/troll) and if necessary, update your Newgatery page. TML 20:22, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

It appears that this story has taken yet another strange turn: Encyclopedist (using the account Nteyclsociedai (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)) now denies making the above edits (see this and this for details). I wonder whether he's really telling the truth, or just playing good cop/bad cop...68.161.106.223 12:35, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Deserved

		The Chain Barnstar of Recognition
		For making a difference! This Barnstar isn't free, this is a chain barnstar, as payment please give this star to at least 3-5 others with 500+ edits but no barnstar. So that everyone who deserves one will get one Pseudoanonymous 19:36, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

If you have much more than 500+ please don't be offended; I am thinking about

• The Chain Barnstar of Merit: 1500+
• The Chain Barnstar of Diligence: 2500+
• The Wikipedian's Chain Barnstar of Honour: 5000+

But I have to make them first Pseudoanonymous 19:36, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

July 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories/Noticeboard, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Buddhipriya 04:21, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

That edit was defiantly not vandalism, the editor was just talking on a talk page :). Yamaka122 ...:) 16:59, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Smile

Lights has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Cheers, Lights 00:04, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar!

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		On your talk page! --Hirohisat Talk 06:18, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Eh?

I really don't understand you... what was that about? —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 09:40, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Yes, that's where I got my name from. It was actually an alternate adaptation of The Flying Dutchman which I had read just before signing up to a particular website, I needed a new name and though Vanderdecken sounded cool. It stuck, I now use it everywhere. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 15:44, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Small world experiment and Small-world phenomenon

• See User talk:Anthony Appleyard#Small world experiment. Anthony Appleyard 09:17, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
• See User talk:Anthony Appleyard#Small world experiment. Anthony Appleyard 16:58, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

user page

It would be rather unusual, but you could request your user page be protected from recreation at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. -- Rick Block (talk) 02:51, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

If salting were necessary you could probably just ask any admin to do it. Orderinchaos 16:29, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Sinebot interfering with your article draft

I noticed a auto-sign bot messing up your draft [1]. You could get the bot to stop doing that if you put {{nobots}} on that page. You could even get the bot to ignore you on every page, but that'd mean having to make a user page for it to read - more info here. ;) Resurgent insurgent 03:08, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

RfA

If i create a RfA_2 for you, will you actually accept this time? aliasd·U·T 13:18, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

...I remember one of "my" previous ones was deleted and the submitted left a particularly sharp message. 68.39.174.238 13:32, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

You have almost attained 20,000 edits, over 10,000 on mainspace, all signed, and all good edits. You have been active for 2 years. Furthermore, you are a great vandal hunter! I believe there is a good rationale for it, as long as you can vouch that nobody will gain access to your admin tools, is that possible, do other people use your IP from your place? aliasd·U·T 13:43, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

The CIA, perhaps... Orderinchaos 03:59, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Oh don't mind me, I was just being humorously scurrilous :) Orderinchaos 12:58, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

It would be hard on MediaWiki to sysop an IP. bibliomaniac15 15 years of trouble and general madness 01:55, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of a template

Hi
About a month ago you deleted this template diff and replaced it with a redirect to Template:Db-noncom, you gave the reason that the tempalte was Blatantly non commercial. Will you please expand on your reason for deleting the template, and, in your opinion how that template could have been used commercially.

Mads Angelbo ^{Talk / Contribs} 18:59, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

You misunderstand. The licence is non commercial. Wikipedia is unable to include media that is not available for non commercial use. If you go back and look at what you just linked us to again, mabye you will understand. aliasd·U·T 00:27, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

WP:GL/IMPROVE#SVG + GIF(!) = SVG

I ...think I've got this sorted? Adam Cuerden ^talk 23:27, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Please note

Your "newgatery" page has been nominated for deletion here. 128.2.251.16 18:16, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

MfD

My deepest apologies - my very weak defense is that I was about to run out at the time and completely forgot, and only just remembered now. Hopefully you are not offended by my callousness. ~ Riana ⁂ 21:59, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Archive

Mind archiving this page? -- Cat ^chi? 15:10, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Yes... 68.39.174.238 16:10, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Why? -- Cat ^chi? 16:18, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

I never archive... 68.39.174.238 20:22, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Are you always this unfriendly and closed to any advice/request? -- Cat ^chi? 20:40, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

I'm not, I'm just terse since these questions didn't seem to call for much elaboration. The emotions behind short text unfortunately are easily lost in writing and (re)reading. 68.39.174.238 00:31, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

I see. Well my concern is that overly long talk pages become harder to use. People with slow bandwidth would have a hard time contacting you. Given you have a decent amount contribution I was merely trying to help you and people trying to contact you. -- Cat ^chi? 00:36, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

If the issue is anons cannot create pages, I'm sure innumerable folks would be happy to create as many blank archive pages for your use as you'd like. I'd also expect any of the folks who run talk page archiver bots would be happy to add your page to their list. Not meant as pressure, just trying to be helpful. -- Rick Block (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

He can create pages in the user talk namespace (and all other talk spaces). Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 09:09, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Your user page (or lack thereof)

I suspect no one will ever try to create your "User" page again, after this config change which causes your sig to no longer show a hideous redlink. Instead people can look at your contribs or user talk page. Yay! Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 09:07, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

That's bizzare, but I suppose people will always be after the red-linked tab up there. That and the loads of older signatures I still have. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 22:54, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		For being a decent and quality editor. Acalamari 23:07, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

I ditto that. I am reminded to put you on white list on the IRC vandalism feed, which means that you are not a vandal IP. Cheers and good work! Miranda 09:28, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

<Miranda>	computer wl add 68.39.174.238
<MiszaBot>	Added 68.39.174.238 to whitelist, "No reason given". Expires indefinite

 Done Miranda 09:49, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you very much

So how many edits do you have? Why don't you actually make your userpage? Where did you see my sig? -The Big X 23:55, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Sig test. -The Big X 23:58, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Sig test. -The Big X 23:59, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

As far as edits/contributions go for this IP Address, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/query.php?what=contribcounter&titles=User:68.39.174.238 is misleadingly empty, and http://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/Tool1/wannabe_kate?username=68.39.174.238&site=en.wikipedia.org, http://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/count_edits?user=68.39.174.238&dbname=enwiki_p, and http://tools.wikimedia.de/~luxo/contributions/contributions.php?user=68.39.174.238&lang=en show "20305" (not including "3407" "Deleted edits") for English Wikipedia, and "22113 contributions found in 58 projects."   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 18:40, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Alot of those deleted edits were ProDding hoaxes, listing things as CSD, etc, etc. 68.39.174.238 18:51, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

I don't doubt it. Anyone who does administrative work here is going to make edits that tag pages for deletion (or discuss or try to improve pages that are so tagged), and most of those edits will eventually be deleted along with the tagged pages. I have 154 deleted edits here myself, and I don't think I need to apologize for any of them. I meant my reply above as a good thing, I'm sorry if you didn't take it that way. See also this edit.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 02:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm also royally annoyed that the LTA subpages got deleted after I'd spent a huge amount of time standarizing and fixing them. (I didn't, don't worry ;) ). 68.39.174.238 02:50, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello! I've noticed that you have edited Wikipedia without logging in to an account. I'm happy that you've been contributing. However, I urge you to create an account. Here is a list of the benefits of having an account:

• You can create new pages
• After a while, you can become an administrator
• After four days, you can edit semi-protected pages
• You can use watchlists
• You can upload images
• You can keep your account from being unfairly blocked if you share an IP
• You can use scripts to better fight annoying vandalism

There are no cons to signing up for an account. In fact, there are more pros here! Signing up is completely free and you don't need to enter any personal information! Plus you can have a user page like mine! So, unless you can think of a con, sign up for an account right now! Wtfdontkill (talk) 03:15, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

linkfarm

Hello 68.39.174.238 and thank you for removing the linkfarm on Portuguese language. However, I believe that you removed some relevant links along the others, such as the Camões Institute, the Portuguese language museum in Brazil, etc. Later I'll review the deleted links and restore a few I believe comply with WP:EL, if that's okay. Best regards, Húsönd 17:29, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar, 68.39.174.238. :-) Best regards, Húsönd 00:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

WRT "if I knew how [to upload on Commons]"

You just left me a nice helpful note, but I am not sure it was to me! It said:

"If someone hasn't already told you or you've found out:

Go to Commons (<http://commons.wikimedia.org/>) or just go straight to the upload page (<http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Upload>) and upload it. Also note that you need a username there and they ONLY take PD/"Free" stuff. 68.39.174.238 03:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)"

Can you tell me where I asked for this information and how long ago? Sorry to bother you, I just hope you weren't trying to help someone else! Thanks though! Saudade7 04:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

OH! Wow, that was so long ago, I'd forgotten. I will do that eventually...It is 5am here and I should go to bed! Thanks! Saudade7 04:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Your identity

Please, could you consider creating a user page only with the {{User committed identity}} template, or of course place it on your talk page for the simple reason that when you finally do lose your IP, someone in the Comcast network may pick it up, impersonate you, gain privileges and potentially harm the project. I believe this is a real possibility. aliasd·U·T 23:11, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

I was talking about privileges associated with your reputation. If the community was convinced you had finally picked up an account, there would be much blind support for you being an admin. Since you seem totally disinterested in the whole thing, I personally would suspect anyone with your ip that tried to do this would be unlikely to be you, this template or a simple hash could alleviate those fears if you decide to get involved in that sort of thing, or catch out a culprit that manages to steal your IP. If you ever want to associate this IP with an account, say in 5 years time or something, you could disclose the string which unlocks the hash. aliasd·U·T 04:42, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

With utmost respect, I don't think you understand me. I am saying if an impersonator got your IP, they may be able to fairly trivially socially engineer admin powers from the community. This template would prevent this ever happening. aliasd·U·T 05:44, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Peak oil, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Peak oil was changed by 68.39.174.238 (c) (t) deleting 8521 characters on 2007-12-06T05:52:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 05:53, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

I fixed the article (obviously your edits were excellent), but will leave it to you whether or not ClueBot needs to know about it. I wonder if there is a way for your edits to be automatically excluded by ClueBot? Risker (talk) 05:59, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

No problems, glad to vindicate you! It took everything I had not to write an edit summary saying "Stupid ClueBot, that's 68.39.174.238!!!" Risker (talk) 06:03, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Iran-Iraq War. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Iran-Iraq War was changed by 68.39.174.238 (c) (t) deleting 8947 characters on 2007-12-06T06:20:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 06:20, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Fixed again, but am going offline now. I just hope I don't get someone jumping on me for that one, it looked very good and I spotchecked them before reverting ClueBot, but there's just something about Middle East articles that gives me the editing willies. I have no idea why I have your page watchlisted (maybe so I could remember when Cluebot is acting silly?), but hope this was helpful tonight. Risker (talk) 06:29, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Hadith (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 03:28, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Suppressor (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 17:25, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to American Motors (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 22:25, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Response

Sorry about that. Because of the amount of vandalism, I've gotten into the bad habit of not checking what the bot does before I revert the people that it reverts. Especially, usually when an anon edits someone's user page, it's usually bad. I am sorry for the inconvenience that you are having in trying to remove spam, but this will probably happen while you don't have an account and when you are trying to move so many things. Academic Challenger (talk) 06:32, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Algaculture. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --  LAX  01:31, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

No offense, but you seem to be a controversial editor. You have over 20,000 edits as an IP, you're very respected by other users, and you, on occasion, receive vandalism warnings. Your edit (to me) appeared to be vandalism. Next time make it a little more simpler so that it does not appear to be vandalism. Cheers, LAX 01:43, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

You're right, I'm sorry. I guess I should have looked at the edit more thoroughly and been a little more cautious. Cheers, LAX 01:52, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Even though you don't have a signature, thanks for signing my autograph book. Cheers, LAX 02:19, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		I, LAX, hereby award IP 68.39.174.238 The Working Man's Barnstar for continuous work on fixing and repairing Link Farms. Cheers, LAX 01:33, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

68.39.174.238

I really wish you would uninvolve yourself in the Super 8mm page, You have wreaked havoc by deleting worthwhile super-8 links, including a couple of mine, but also well over a a dozen of useful links. If you don't know about super-8, leave the page alone, please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.129.88.30 (talk) 07:36, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Coat of Arms, Grand Duchy of Finland

I've responded to your request at Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Images to improve#Coat of Arms, Grand Duchy of Finland. If you could give me some feedback, I'd appreciate it. -- I. Pankonin (t/c) 03:27, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Graphic lab

Hi there,

When you request work from the Graphic Lab, could you please use the template at the top of the page? Where does the version with "oppinion" and "articels" come from anyway? --Slashme (talk) 06:32, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I know the current version does break the linking, but the archiving depends on the "done" label. --Slashme (talk) 14:13, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

---

---

Hello, can you help me by cleaning up the Graphic LAb/Research and developmt page ? The work to do, slowly, is to hide useless and out of topic sentences , like this edit. Hide + summarize 2 paragraphes a day may be already great. 210.203.61.15 (talk) 14:18, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		For always being positive and being willing to take jokes. --Nlu (talk) 06:16, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for this. :-P miranda 02:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008

Your recent edit to Jacksonville, Florida (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 06:56, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

ENOUGH with you and your re-addition of linkfarms! I've reverted you for that. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 07:02, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Czech language (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 23:31, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

O [...] you. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 23:44, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

I put in a successful request to get your edits whitelisted by the bot, so hopefully you won't have to deal with this anymore. east.718 at 06:53, January 4, 2008

Grr is right. I'm going to speak to VoA again and see if I can get this fixed. east.718 at 11:18, January 8, 2008

Your recent edit to Otaku (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 05:20, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

HaH, I reverted you. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 05:25, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Reform mathematics (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 11:45, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Reform mathematics (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 11:47, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Reform mathematics (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 11:50, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Yoruba religion (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 17:16, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Chernobyl disaster (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 23:00, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

...for being the only person working on WP:LINKHATE. I'd tell you to register and run for adminship, but I'm sure you've heard it a million times already and want to keep doing things your way. east.718 at 07:21, January 3, 2008

It's kind of an inside joke. A shortcut was needed to keep the topic in the admins' IRC channel from becoming too long, so I made a play off a very controversial guideline, WP:LINKLOVE. Please continue to keep up the high-quality contributions! east.718 at 09:06, January 3, 2008

January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nuclear program of Iran, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Nuclear program of Iran was changed by 68.39.174.238 (c) (t) deleting 8180 characters on 2008-01-07T19:33:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:33, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Not vandalism, reverted. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 19:40, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Um, not sure how else to get in touch with you. You sent me a message about not editing a section, something with vandalism. Thing is, I haven't edited any entries in wikipedia. I'm guessing it's a program error. Sorry, just wanted to give you a heads up. (Feel free to delete this off your page once you read it.) Take care and thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.145.123.126 (talk) 04:58, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Get an account!

Just kidding, don't. Then you'd become normal. Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP!☺} 05:33, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

English is the universal language

Yug seemed to forget that we should be trying to establish communication with the German Lab as well. I think we need to get going and make setting standards a worldwide effort. The English lab should try to take on a dominant role is setting these standards, as it's destined to become the big dog in the room. We might make a point that English should be used for setting the standards, as it's the most universal of the three languages. i. e. higher percentage of the french and germans speak english than of the anglophones speak the other languages. I don't really know about the technical standards to make any contribution there, but we've probably already got as many or more technical people as the French. Sagredo^{⊙☿♀♁♂♃♄} 19:30, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Why not get account?

I admit that I am impressed that you have not created an account. I think that you are actually the only person on Wikipedia who edits without logging in, so you are definitely being creative. But, I have to ask: Does it make you feel tough?--Givelegal22 (talk) 20:12, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

No, it's quite nice, actually. Look: you're tearing everyone apart! I stayed up all last night thinking about it. Ask yourself: What would Hitler do if he were in your shoes? ;)--Givelegal22 (talk) 12:47, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

I've added it to the list already in RfCU. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 18:00, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Hey 68: Why haven't you responded to my question?--Givelegal22 (talk) 04:51, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Givelegal22 (talk • contribs) 14:44, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Images

I wish you would get an account! Do you think I am the sort of editor who would upload a truckload of images if I didn't have permission to use them? I have forwarded my email to the permission branch of wikipedia -its up to them to sort out the OTRS ticketing now ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^Talk? 21:34, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

And yes thats exactly why I didn't upload them to the commons because people there are in the frame of mind of delete first ask questions later ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^Talk? 21:36, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your message on my talk page regarding your OTRS query. I've search through the system a number of different ways and been unable to find a ticket relevant. However, it is of course important to note that just because I wasn't able to find the permission, it doesn't mean it isn't there. I'll ask the uploader for some more details to allow me to track down the email and I'll let you know what progress is made on this issue. Regards. Adambro (talk) 18:03, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

You don't need to register

Hello, 68.39.174.238 ... the IP for my DSL account changes every few weeks, but that hasn't stopped me ... just a friendly "Attaboy!" from a fellow anon-IP editor. :-) —72.75.72.63 (talk · contribs) 12:50, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

your edits for today

have attracted the attention of VoaBot. Not sure what happened there, but you look like a real editor and not a vandal. . . . Dlohcierekim 17:22, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

You're on the whitelist for VoABot II (actually the bot allies list o.O) but it's still reverting you for some reason. I suggest instead of deleting linkfarms outright, just comment them out and leave an explanatory note in the edit summary. Best, east.718 at 21:38, January 17, 2008

'238 Userbox MfD

User:Solumeiras has nominated a number of subpages (userspace userboxes, actually) in your user talkspace for deletion:

• User talk:68.39.174.238/dontcare at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:68.39.174.238/dontcare
• User talk:68.39.174.238/accountbeggars at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:68.39.174.238/accountbeggars
• User talk:68.39.174.238/noaccount at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:68.39.174.238/noaccount
• User talk:68.39.174.238/noneofmybusiness at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:68.39.174.238/noneofmybusiness

I thought it'd be polite to inform the person whose pages were being deleted. Have a great day, 68.39.174.238! :) ~Kylu (u|t) 21:07, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Surprisingly, three of these were created by-- Kylu! LOL. Dlohcierekim 21:47, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Sure were, and I still think '238 should be treated with a bit more respect, considering how much work he puts into Wikipedia. That's why I made them to begin with. ~Kylu (u|t) 21:49, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

I used TWINKLE when nominating these, and it notified Kylu not you, 68.39.*. The debate should be closed as I was not thinking straight when I nominated it - I was vandal-fighting and doing a fair bit of vandal-reversion yesterday. Apologies to 68.39.174.238 and Kylu for this nomination, it wasn't a bad-faith nomination, I just wasn't thinking straight. Sorry for the harm and upset I caused. --Solumeiras ^talk 10:22, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

Thanks for the barnstar, much appreciated!

BTW, your "fireworks" message is LOL at work funny! --Slashme (talk) 06:01, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

(in reply to question) You know the "your neighbours have been letting of fireworks so you have been blocked" thing. --Slashme (talk) 06:28, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

And so was your edit to my error message! It's staying like that for sure! --Slashme (talk) 06:17, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

This Section will be to delete when read

because it's this one to read :

• User_talk:68.39.174.238#Graphic_lab —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.203.61.15 (talk) 14:20, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

LOL...

You are keeping the people at the Graphics Lab busy! :-P See you around. Miranda 20:05, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Parliament.py

File:TestSenate.svg

Settings: Title: US Senate 2008 List: Republicans, 49,#DD4444; Democrats, 51,#4444DD (also works without the colours) Height: 5

Settings: Title: US Senate 2008 List: Republicans, 49,#DD4444; Democrats, 51,#4444DD (also works without the colours) Height: 10

Hi, please try again, I think it's working OK now. --Slashme (talk) 06:06, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

I see my diagrams make a nice demonstration of that optical illusion where the spots appear between the corners of the squares except in the focus of your view ;-) --Slashme (talk) 06:19, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Hermann grid illusion ~Kylu (u|t) 22:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Why not get account?

So, when do plan on getting an account? Also, what name will you choose for it? You could name it My_IP_Address_is_68.39.174.238. That way, you'd get the best of both worlds. And I'd finally be able to put this chapter of my life behind me.--Givelegal22 (talk) 10:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

• Please do get an account. I somehow managed to create a My IP Address is 127.0.0.1 (well, actually User:My IP Address Is 82.42.237.84 is the user IPname account) and it worked. Go on, do it, Mr 68.39.174.238, that way you can edit semi-protected pages as well, without having to do editprotected requests all the time!! Thanks, --Solumeiras (talk) 14:31, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Parliament.py

In reply to:

Does the fact that it now fails to return anything count, or is that because of the "bug fixing in progress" ? 68.39.174.238 (talk) 18:11, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

It works for me (tested when I reported the bug fixed and three minutes ago). When you say "fails to return anything", do you get a completely blank screen, or an error message of some kind? Seeing as the script is server-side, reloading without cache shouldn't help, but maybe there's something about the form that's changed, so give it a shot. --Slashme (talk) 05:09, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Your answers are requested there (subject : archiving and summarization of all the talk/test/draft pages about the Slashme's script and Legislative standard).

09:31, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Reverse of the US Great Seal

Booyah! -- I. Pankonin Review me! 09:19, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Guess who?

    ____       _                __  _                                        __
   / __ \_____(_)___ ___  ___  / /_(_)___ ___  ___    _      ______ ______  / /_  ___  ________
  / /_/ / ___/ / __ `__ \/ _ \/ __/ / __ `__ \/ _ \  | | /| / / __ `/ ___/ / __ \/ _ \/ ___/ _ \
 / ____/ /  / / / / / / /  __/ /_/ / / / / / /  __/  | |/ |/ / /_/ (__  ) / / / /  __/ /  /  __/
/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/ /_/\___/\__/_/_/ /_/ /_/\___/   |__/|__/\__,_/____/ /_/ /_/\___/_/   \___/

Actually it was "РЯ1МЕТ1МЕ", a notorious impoſtor. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 17:43, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

black stump

you have added a link to Beyond the pale on the Black stump page. This leads to a redirection page, and I'm not sure which of the options you were thinking of when you said it was a similar idea. Could you specify which one, please, so the link can go straight there? WotherspoonSmith (talk) 03:38, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks For The Flag!

Thanks for adding the proper flag to our Battle of the Little Bighorn article. I had removed an anachronistic reginmental flag from the 1920s and tried to upload and post a guidon image; another editor had kindly supplied a better and more legal image, and I appreciate the fact that you placed it properly on the page. I still have a lot to learn about how to do stuff like that. Funny thinh is - I've done it correctly in other pages but forgot how to. Thanks! Sensei48 (talk) 07:28, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Indonesian COA

The first image, the one from vector images.com is obviously a derivation of the gov't COA. At some point derivations can become different enough to allow their own copyright. I don't know how that is defined. Quite probably it depends on how good a lawyer you hire. We should avoid redrawing (in vector) close copies of images from VI as there is a possibility that the image has been changed sufficiently to qualify for its own copyright. Which would be a Russian copyright, because VI is, as you know, in Russia. There's another real world factor. It would take a hell of a lot of rubles to hire a decent attorney in the U. S. or U. K. or wherever they would have to sue Wiki. My thought is to quietly move away from using their images. I put this on your talk page, as I don't want educate certain deletionist parties who frequent the graphics lab, please consider deleting it. (It's late, I'm tired, so this probably makes no sense, anyway.) Sagredo^{⊙☿♀♁♂♃♄} 20:10, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

I meant deleting these comments. I don't know how fast we can do them. The scouting people were kind enough to put a barnstar on my user page, just as they emailed me a list of about 30 logos. The real world is likely to start demanding more of my time, as well. On the VI images, we need to find (google) government (or whatever) images to be sure we're not redrawing something like the wings of the Indonesian eagle. The first part of the project should be to replace the VI rasters with ones from safe sources, concentrating as you say national and state emblems first. an Image google for the motto also worked well.

We could do without the time wasting copyright debate on the graphics page, too. It think User:Sagredo/copyrights and trademarks is ready to be looked over by one or more of Category:Wikipedian intellectual property lawyers, and then should be moved to the graphics lab. Sagredo^{⊙☿♀♁♂♃♄} 21:36, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Graphics Lab

Sorry, thought I had seeing as I did the other requests... Mangwanani (talk) 16:59, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

---

Please notice the new request in the section User_talk:68.39.174.238#Parliament.py 210.203.61.15 (talk) 14:33, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Bad guys and good guys who're still around

Hey! It's been a long time since we bumped into each other. I'm surprised you're still around - even a lot of admins have burnt out and left. :)

But there's bad guys still around too - User:Guywithdress and his socks mean everyone's favourite copyvio writer is still alive and kicking. :( Pegasus «C¦T» 02:23, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

User:Logged in 22

Okay, so what's the point of this edit? I'm not seeing the connection here. --Calton | Talk 02:43, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

I undid your change, since the "Suspected sockpuppets of Guywithdress" category is already sub-categorised under Primetime. Apparently no one saw the connection, but I'm amazed the person who re-deleted Dthat didn't. Pegasus «C¦T» 03:10, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your usrpage, basically I didn't see the subcategorization, so it wasn't a very useful edit. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 19:34, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

BTW... do you want that cool new create-protection thing enabled for your user page? :) (Deliberately trying to save you from more scrolling by not putting this in a new topic. :P) Pegasus «C¦T» 00:11, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Autovon

I made a small link in the Autovon article - but there appears to be so many bells around that I am not really sure which one to ring link to. Can you correct the link if it's going to the wrong page? Thanks!

(I know this probably is ideally more appropriate for article's talk page, blah blah, but this one should be a quickie for you. :) ) Pegasus «C¦T» 07:16, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

What the hell?

Create an account, please! You can be the best edian ever! Basketball110 _{what famous people say} 00:47, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

		The Editor's Barnstar
		This is a barnstar for being the best editor ever on Wikipedia. This barnstar is like a minister: no this barnstar can accept gifts over 50$. The point is that it is persuasive. This barnstar is upset that it's receiver doesn't create an account. Basketball110 what famous people say 03:53, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Edian is short for Wikipedian. User:Maximillion Pegasus brought up a point that I hadn't thought of: your edits won't be transfered from IP to user, if you decide to become an edian. But then again, you'd have about 116 co-nominators for administor. Cheers, Basketball110 _{what famous people say} 04:15, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

User page

I noticed you do not have a user page, would you like one? Maximillion Pegasus (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Nuuuuu! We just deleted his userpage, don't recreate it... lol. He's said no before, anyway, and the page has been deleted somewhere around 15 times. Cheers, Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP!☺} 08:20, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh, I see that. Sorry. Cheers. Maximillion Pegasus (talk) 18:59, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Hypothesis

I have a hypothesis that this IP address does not belong to one person, but has changed hands a multitude of times over the years. Miraculously, it has always gone to someone who has decided to make lots of great edits before moving on to another great edtor, and another, and another. I propose to call this the "68.39.174.238 alternating users hypothesis". There could be a user box and everything. Okiefromokla ^questions? 19:54, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

As far as I know, ever edit made from here as been mine. Granted, someone else could've edited for a time and I wouldn't've known it if they didn't do something really noteworthy that later came back to me. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 20:28, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Userboxes

Hi there, I created a bunch of userboxes to describe the editing style of no account IP's for a friend of mine 156.34.142.110, and he liked them and reccomended that I show them to you so if you wanted to you could add them to your user talk page :).Cheers,--Mifter (talk) 23:34, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Code	Result
|{{User:Mifter/Userboxes/IP Edits}}	IPThis user thinks that accounts are overrated and would much rather edit from an IP address. ±	Usage
|{{User:Mifter/Userboxes/Ip contrib}}	This user likes to remain an anonymous contributor and thus edits only from IP address and does not use an account. ±	Usage
|{{User:Mifter/Userboxes/Here to edit}}	No AccountThis user is here to edit and has no lofty goals beyond that and thus does not use an account to edit. ±	Usage

--Mifter (talk) 23:34, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Question

Are you just vandalizing to not be requested to get an account?--67.87.67.175 (talk) 16:10, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

nominated for adminship

G'day. I would like you to consider Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/68.39.174.238 seriously. As I have noted there, I suggest that you create an account that would take the sysop flag once appointed, and you could continue to edit from an IP address whenever it suits you. You would then be able to do sysop actions when appropriate, reducing the double handling. This is not without precedent, as I have successfully nominated another good contributor who had continued to edit from an IP address until I thought his contributions were of sufficient quality that he would be an asset to the admin team. John Vandenberg (talk) 03:56, 10 March 2008 (UTC)