Maximian: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Epbr123 (talk | contribs)
clean up , typos fixed: the the → the using AWB
(75 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 21: Line 21:
|}}
|}}


'''Marcus Aurelius Valerius Maximianus Herculius''' (''ca''. 250&nbsp;&ndash;&nbsp;''ca''. July 310<ref name="BNNE32"/>), commonly referred to as '''Maximian''', was [[Caesar (title)|Caesar]] (junior [[Roman Emperor]]) from July 285<ref name="CAESDATEa"/><ref name="CAESDATEb"/> and [[Augustus (title)|Augustus]] (senior Roman Emperor) from [[April 1]] [[286]]<ref name="AUGDATE"/> to [[May 1]] [[305]].<ref name="BNE4"/> He shared the latter title with his co-emperor and superior, [[Diocletian]]. Maximian established his residence at [[Trier]], but spent most of his time on campaign. In the late summer of 285, he suppressed the rebel [[Bagaudae]] in Gaul. From 285 to 288, he fought against Germanic tribes along the Rhine frontier. Together with Diocletian, he ran a [[scorched earth]] campaign deep into [[Alamanni]] territory in 288, temporarily relieving the Rhenish provinces from the threat of Germanic invasion.
'''Marcus Aurelius Valerius Maximianus Herculius''' (''ca''. 250&nbsp;&ndash;&nbsp;''ca''. July 310<ref name="BNNE32"/>), commonly referred to as '''Maximian''', was [[Caesar (title)|Caesar]] (junior [[Roman Emperor]]) from July 285<ref name="CAESDATEa"/><ref name="CAESDATEb"/> and [[Augustus (title)|Augustus]] (senior Roman Emperor) from [[April 1]] [[286]]<ref name="AUGDATE"/> to [[May 1]] [[305]].<ref name="BNE4"/> He shared the latter title with his co-emperor and superior, [[Diocletian]], whose political brain complemented Maximian's military brawn. Maximian established his residence at [[Trier]] but spent most of his time on campaign. In the late summer of 285, he suppressed rebels in Gaul known as the [[Bagaudae]]. From 285 to 288, he fought against Germanic tribes along the Rhine frontier. Together with Diocletian, he ran a [[scorched earth]] campaign deep into the territory of the [[Alamanni]] tribes in 288, temporarily relieving the Rhenish provinces from the threat of Germanic invasion.


The man he appointed to police the [[English Channel|Channel]] shores, [[Carausius]], rebelled in 286, causing the secession of Britain and northwestern Gaul. Maximian was unsuccessful in his attempts to oust Carausius, and his invasion fleet was destroyed by storms in 289 or 290. Carausius' successor [[Allectus]] was ousted in 296 by Maximian's subordinate [[Constantius Chlorus|Constantius]]. During Constantius' campaign, Maximian held the Rhenish frontier. After Constantius' success, Maximian moved south to combat [[Moor]]ish pirates in Iberia and [[Berber]] incursions in [[Mauretania]]. When these campaigns concluded in 298, he departed for Italy, where he lived in comfort until 305. At Diocletian's behest, Maximian abdicated on [[May 1]] [[305]], gave the Augustan office to Constantius, and retired to southern Italy.
The man he appointed to police the [[English Channel|Channel]] shores, [[Carausius]], rebelled in 286, causing the secession of Britain and northwestern Gaul. Maximian failed to oust Carausius, and his invasion fleet was destroyed by storms in 289 or 290. Maximan's subordinate, [[Constantius Chlorus|Constantius]], campaigned against Carausius' successor, [[Allectus]], while Maximian held the Rhenish frontier. The rebel leader was ousted in 296, and Maximian moved south to combat [[Moor]]ish pirates in Iberia and [[Berber]] incursions in [[Mauretania]]. When these campaigns concluded in 298, he departed for Italy, where he lived in comfort until 305. At Diocletian's behest, Maximian abdicated on [[May 1]] [[305]], gave the Augustan office to Constantius, and retired to southern Italy.


In late 306, Maximian took the title of Augustus again, and aided his son [[Maxentius]]' rebellion in Italy. In April 307, he attempted to depose his son, but failed, and fled to the court of Constantius' successor [[Constantine I|Constantine]] in Trier. At the Council of [[Carnuntum]] in November 308, Diocletian and his successor [[Galerius]] forced Maximian to renounce his imperial claim again. In early 310, he attempted to seize Constantine's title while Constantine was on campaign on the Rhine. Few supported him, and he was captured by Constantine in Marseille. Maximian committed suicide in the summer of 310 on Constantine's orders. During Constantine's war with Maxentius, Maximian's image was purged from all public places. After Constantine ousted and killed Maxentius, Maximian's image was rehabilitated, and he was deified.
In late 306, Maximian took the title of Augustus again and aided his son [[Maxentius]]' rebellion in Italy. In April 307, he attempted to depose his son, but failed and fled to the court of Constantius' successor, [[Constantine I|Constantine]], in Trier. At the Council of [[Carnuntum]] in November 308, Diocletian and his successor, [[Galerius]], forced Maximian to renounce his imperial claim again. In early 310, Maximian attempted to seize Constantine's title while the emperor was on campaign on the Rhine. Few supported him, and he was captured by Constantine in Marseille. Maximian committed suicide in the summer of 310 on Constantine's orders. During Constantine's war with Maxentius, Maximian's image was purged from all public places. However, after Constantine ousted and killed Maxentius, Maximian's image was rehabilitated, and he was deified.


==Early life==
==Early life==
===Early career===
Maximian was born near [[Sirmium]] ([[Sremska Mitrovica]], [[Serbia]]) in the [[Roman province|province]] of [[Pannonia]], around 250.<ref>Barnes, ''New Empire'', 32; Rees, ''Layers of Loyalty'', 30; Williams, 43&ndash;44.</ref> Little is known about Maximian's parentage; the only precise statement made in ancient sources is that his parents were shopkeepers near Sirmium.<ref>''Epitome de Caesaribus'' 40.10, quoted in Barnes, ''New Empire'', 32.</ref> Beyond that, there are only vague allusions to [[Illyricum (Roman province)|Illyricum]] as his homeland,<ref>Victor, ''Liber de Caesaribus'' 39.26, quoted in Barnes, ''New Empire'', 32.</ref> to his Pannonian virtues,<ref>''Panegrici Latini'' 10(2).2.2ff, quoted in Barnes, ''New Empire'', 32.</ref> and to his harsh upbringing along the war-torn [[Danube]] frontier.<ref>''Panegrici Latini'' 10(2).2.4, quoted in Rees, ''Layers of Loyalty'', 44&ndash;45.</ref> Maximian joined the army, serving with [[Diocletian]] under the Emperors [[Aurelian]] (r. 270&ndash;275) and [[Probus]] (r. 276&ndash;282). He probably participated in the Mesopotamian campaign of [[Carus]] in 283 and it is likely that he was present when Diocletian was elected emperor on [[November 20]] [[284]] at [[Nicomedia]].<ref>Barnes, ''New Empire'', 32&ndash;33; Rees, ''Layers of Loyalty'', 30.</ref> The early date of Maximian's appointment suggests that Diocletian had a relationship with Maximian long before appointing him Caesar, and Maximian probably supported Diocletian during his campaign against [[Carinus]] (r. 283&ndash;285).<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 6; Williams, 43&ndash;44.</ref> Some historians speculate that Maximian and Diocletian arranged their eventual roles before Diocletian's rise to power, but such speculation is impossible to prove or disprove.<ref>Williams, 43&ndash;44.</ref>


Maximian was born near [[Sirmium]] ([[Sremska Mitrovica]], [[Serbia]]) in the [[Roman province|province]] of [[Pannonia]], around 250 into a family of shopkeepers.<ref>''Epitome de Caesaribus'' 40.10, quoted in Barnes, ''New Empire'', 32; Barnes, ''New Empire'', 32; Rees, ''Layers of Loyalty'', 30; Williams, 43&ndash;44.</ref> Beyond that, the ancient sources contain vague allusions to [[Illyricum (Roman province)|Illyricum]] as his homeland,<ref>Victor, ''Liber de Caesaribus'' 39.26, quoted in Barnes, ''New Empire'', 32.</ref> to his Pannonian virtues,<ref>''Panegrici Latini'' 10(2).2.2ff, quoted in Barnes, ''New Empire'', 32.</ref> and to his harsh upbringing along the war-torn [[Danube]] frontier.<ref>''Panegrici Latini'' 10(2).2.4, quoted in Rees, ''Layers of Loyalty'', 44&ndash;45.</ref> Maximian joined the army, serving with [[Diocletian]] under the emperors [[Aurelian]] (r. 270&ndash;275) and [[Probus]] (r. 276&ndash;282). He probably participated in the Mesopotamian campaign of [[Carus]] in 283 and attended Diocletian's election as emperor on [[November 20]] [[284]] at [[Nicomedia]].<ref>Barnes, ''New Empire'', 32&ndash;33; Rees, ''Layers of Loyalty'', 30.</ref> Maximian's swift appointment by Diocletian as Caesar is taken by the writer Stephen Williams and historian [[Timothy Barnes]] to mean that the two men were longterm allies, that their respective roles were pre-agreed and that Maximian had probably supported Diocletian during his campaign against [[Carinus]] (r. 283&ndash;285) but there is no direct evidence for this.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 6; Williams, 43&ndash;44.</ref>
===Personality===
Maximian was a man of great energy and firm aggressive character. His temperament made him unlikely to rebel. These characteristics made Maximian an appealing candidate for imperial office. The fourth-century historian [[Aurelius Victor]] describes Maximian as "a colleague trustworthy in friendship, if somewhat boorish, and of great military talents".<ref>Victor, ''Liber de Caesaribus'' 39, quoted in Williams, 44.</ref> A rustic, Maximian was unlearned, and never sought education. The panegyrist of 289, after comparing his actions to [[Scipio Africanus]]' victories over [[Hannibal]] during the [[Second Punic War]], suggests that Maximian has never heard of them.<ref>''Panegyrici Latini'' 10(2), quoted in Williams, 44.</ref> His ambitions were limited to the sphere of military action; he did not conflict with Diocletian in matters of politics.<ref>Williams, 44.</ref> The [[Christian]] [[Rhetoric|rhetor]] [[Lactantius]] suggests that Maximian shared Diocletian's basic attitudes but was less puritanical in his tastes, and enjoyed the sensual prerogatives offered by his position as emperor.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 13.</ref> Lactantius records charges that Maxiamian defiled senator's daughters and that while traveling he took young virgins to satisfy his unending lust, but Lactantius' hostility towards pagans discredits his statements.<ref>Lactantius, ''DMP'' 8, quoted in Williams, 44.</ref>


With his great energy, firm aggressive character and disinclination to rebel, Maximian was an appealing candidate for imperial office. The fourth-century historian [[Aurelius Victor]] described Maximian as "a colleague trustworthy in friendship, if somewhat boorish, and of great military talents".<ref>Victor, ''Liber de Caesaribus'' 39, quoted in Williams, 44.</ref> Despite his other qualities, Maximian was uneducated and preferred action to thought. The panegyrist of 289, after comparing his actions to [[Scipio Africanus]]' victories over [[Hannibal]] during the [[Second Punic War]], suggested that Maximian has never heard of them.<ref>''Panegyrici Latini'' 10(2), quoted in Williams, 44.</ref> His ambitions were purely military; he left politics to Diocletian.<ref>Williams, 44.</ref> The [[Christian]] [[Rhetoric|rhetor]] [[Lactantius]] suggested that Maximian shared Diocletian's basic attitudes but was less puritanical in his tastes, and took advantage of the sensual opportunities his position as emperor offered.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 13.</ref> Lactantius charged that Maximian defiled senator's daughters and traveled with young virgins to satisfy his unending lust, though Lactantius' credibility is undermined by his hostility towards pagans.<ref>Lactantius, ''DMP'' 8, quoted in Williams, 44.</ref>
===Family===

Maximian had two children with his [[Syria]]n wife, [[Eutropia]]: Maxentius and [[Fausta]]. There is no direct evidence in the ancient sources for their birthdates. Modern estimates of Maxentius' birth year have varied from circa 277 to circa 287, and most date Fausta's birth to circa 298.<ref>Barnes, ''New Empire'', 34. Barnes dates Maxentius' birth to circa 283, when Maximian was in Syria, and Fausta's birth to 289 or 290 (Barnes, ''New Empire'', 34).</ref> [[Flavia Maximiana Theodora|Theodora]], the wife of [[Constantius Chlorus]], is often called Maximian's stepdaughter by many ancient sources.<ref>Aurelius Victor, ''de Caesaribus'' 39.25; Eutropius, ''Breviaria'' 9.22; Jerome, ''Chronicle'' 225<sup>g</sup>; ''Epitome de Caesaribus'' 39.2, 40.12, quoted in Barnes, ''New Empire'', 33.</ref> It has been postulated that she was born from an earlier marriage between Eutropia and Afranius Hannibalianus.<ref>Barnes, ''New Empire'', 33.</ref> The modern historian [[Timothy Barnes]] has challenged this view, declaring that the sources that call Theodora Maximian's stepdaughter all derive their information from the unreliable "[[Enmannsche Kaisergeschichte|Kaisergeschichte]]". A smaller number of more reliable sources call Theodora Maximian's full daughter.<ref>''Origo Constantini'' 2; Philostorgius, ''Historia Ecclesiastica'' 2.16<sup>a</sup>, quoted in Barnes, ''New Empire'', 33. See also ''Panegyrici Latini'' 10(2)11.4.</ref> Barnes postulates that Theodora was born no later than circa 275 to an unnamed earlier wife of Maximian, possibly one of Hannibalianus' daughters.<ref>Barnes, ''New Empire'', 33&ndash;34.</ref>
Maximian had two children with his [[Syria]]n wife, [[Eutropia]]: Maxentius and [[Fausta]]. There is no direct evidence in the ancient sources for their birthdates. Modern estimates of Maxentius' birth year have varied from circa 277 to circa 287, and most date Fausta's birth to circa 298.<ref>Barnes, ''New Empire'', 34. Barnes dates Maxentius' birth to circa 283, when Maximian was in Syria, and Fausta's birth to 289 or 290 (Barnes, ''New Empire'', 34).</ref> [[Flavia Maximiana Theodora|Theodora]], the wife of [[Constantius Chlorus]], is often called Maximian's stepdaughter by ancient sources, leading to claims by [[Otto Seeck]] and Ernest Stein that she was born from an earlier marriage between Eutropia and Afranius Hannibalianus.<ref>Aurelius Victor, ''de Caesaribus'' 39.25; Eutropius, ''Breviaria'' 9.22; Jerome, ''Chronicle'' 225<sup>g</sup>; ''Epitome de Caesaribus'' 39.2, 40.12, quoted in Barnes, ''New Empire'', 33; Barnes, ''New Empire'', 33.</ref> Barnes challenges this view, saying that all "stepdaughter" sources derive their information from the partially unreliable work of history ''[[Enmannsche Kaisergeschichte|Kaisergeschichte]]'', while other, more reliable sources, refer to her as Maximian's natural daughter.<ref>''Origo Constantini'' 2; Philostorgius, ''Historia Ecclesiastica'' 2.16<sup>a</sup>, quoted in Barnes, ''New Empire'', 33. See also ''Panegyrici Latini'' 10(2)11.4.</ref> Barnes concludes that Theodora was born no later than circa 275 to an unnamed earlier wife of Maximian, possibly one of Hannibalianus' daughters.<ref>Barnes, ''New Empire'', 33&ndash;34.</ref>


==Appointment as Caesar==
==Appointment as Caesar==
[[Image:DSC04500i Istanbul - Museo archeol. - Diocleziano (284-205 d.C.) - Foto G. Dall'Orto 28-5-2006.jpg|thumb|right|[[Diocletian]], Maximian's senior colleague and [[Augustus (title)|Augustus]] of the East]]
[[Image:DSC04500i Istanbul - Museo archeol. - Diocleziano (284-205 d.C.) - Foto G. Dall'Orto 28-5-2006.jpg|thumb|right|[[Diocletian]], Maximian's senior colleague and [[Augustus (title)|Augustus]] of the East]]
<!-- I'd be happier if the reasons why came first but I can't think of a neat way of doing this at the moment.-->
At [[Mediolanum]] ([[Milan]], [[Italy]]) in July 285,<ref>The event has been dated to both [[July 21]] (Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 6; Barnes, ''New Empire'', 4) and [[July 25]] (Potter, 280&ndash;81).</ref> Diocletian proclaimed Maximian as his co-ruler, or [[Caesar (title)|Caesar]].<ref>Bleckmann; Corcoran, "Before Constantine", 40.</ref> Recent history had demonstrated to Diocletian that ruling alone was dangerous to the stability of the empire; the sole-emperors Aurelian and Probus had been easily removed from power in spite of their military prowess, destabilizing the empire.<ref name="P280">Potter, 280.</ref> There was conflict in every province of the empire, from Gaul to Syria, from Egypt to the lower Danube. Diocletian needed a lieutenant to manage his heavy workload.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 6; Rees, ''Layers of Loyalty'', 30; Southern, 136.</ref> Some suggest that less flattering reasons were also influential; it has been suggested that Diocletian thought himself a mediocre general, and in need of a man to do most of his fighting. Maximian fit this position well.<ref>Williams, 45.</ref>
At [[Mediolanum]] ([[Milan]], [[Italy]]) in July 285,<ref>The event has been dated to both [[July 21]] (Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 6; Barnes, ''New Empire'', 4) and [[July 25]] (Potter, 280&ndash;81).</ref> Diocletian proclaimed Maximian as his co-ruler, or [[Caesar (title)|Caesar]].<ref>Bleckmann; Corcoran, "Before Constantine", 40.</ref> The reasons for this decision are complex. With conflict in every province of the empire, from Gaul to Syria, from Egypt to the lower Danube, Diocletian needed a lieutenant to manage his heavy workload.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 6; Rees, ''Layers of Loyalty'', 30; Southern, 136.</ref> Historian Stephen Williams suggests that Diocletian considered himself a mediocre general and needed a man like Maximian to do most of his fighting.<ref>Williams, 45.</ref>


The concept of dual rulership was nothing new to the Roman Empire. [[Augustus]], the first emperor (r. 27 BC&ndash;AD 19), had shared power with his colleagues, and more formal offices of co-emperor had existed from [[Marcus Aurelius]] (r. 161&ndash;180) on.<ref>Corcoran, "Before Constantine", 40.</ref> Most recently, the emperor Carus and his sons had ruled together, albeit unsuccessfully. Diocletian was in a less comfortable position than most of his predecessors, as he had a daughter, Valeria, but no sons. His co-ruler had to be from outside his family and could not, therefore, be easily trusted.<ref>Potter, 280; Southern, 136; Williams, 43.</ref> Some historians state that Diocletian, like childless emperors before him, adopted Maximian as his ''filius Augusti'' ("Augustan son") upon his appointment to the office, but this argument has not been universally accepted.<ref>Odahl, 42&ndash;43; Southern, 136; Williams, 45.</ref>
Next, Diocletian was vulnerable in that he had no sons just a daughter, Valeria who could never succeed him. He was forced therefore to seek a co-ruler from outside his family and that co-ruler had to be someone he trusted.<ref>Potter, 280; Southern, 136; Williams, 43.</ref> (The historian William Seston has argued that Diocletian, like heirless emperors before him, adopted Maximian as his ''filius Augusti'' ("Augustan son") upon his appointment to the office. Some agree, but the historian [[Frank Kolb]] has stated that arguments for the adoption are based on misreadings of the papyrological evidence.<ref>Odahl, 42&ndash;43; Southern, 136, 331;
Williams, 45.</ref>)


Finally, Diocletian knew that single rule was dangerous and that precedent existed for dual rulership. Despite their military prowess, both sole-emperors Aurelian and Probus had been easily removed from power.<ref name="P280">Potter, 280.</ref> In contrast, just a few years earlier, the emperor Carus and his sons had ruled jointly, albeit not for long. Even the first emperor, [[Augustus]], (r. 27 BC&ndash;AD 19), had shared power with his colleagues and more formal offices of co-emperor had existed from [[Marcus Aurelius]] (r. 161&ndash;180) on.<ref>Corcoran, "Before Constantine", 40.</ref>
The relationship between the two rulers was quickly couched in religious terms. Circa 287 Diocletian assumed the title ''Iovius'', and Maximian that of ''Herculius''.<ref>Corcoran, "Before Constantine", 40; Liebeschuetz, ''Continuity and Change'', 235&ndash;52, 240–43; Odahl, 43&ndash;44; Rees, ''Layers of Loyalty'', 32&ndash;33.</ref> The titles were probably meant to convey certain characteristics of their associated leaders: Diocletian, in [[Jupiter (mythology)|Jovian]] style, would take on the dominating roles of planning and commanding; Maximian, in [[Hercules|Herculian]] mode, would take on the lesser, but still [[hero]]ic, role of completing assigned tasks.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 11&ndash;12; Corcoran, "Before Constantine", 40; Odahl, 43; Rees, ''Layers of Loyalty'', 32&ndash;33, 39, 42&ndash;52; Southern, 136&ndash;37; Williams, 58&ndash;59.</ref> For all their religious connotations, however, the emperors were not meant to be "gods" in the tradition of the [[Imperial cult (ancient Rome)|Imperial cult]]&mdash;although they may have been hailed as such in Imperial panegyrics. Instead, they were seen as the representatives of the gods, the tools effecting the gods' will on earth.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 11.</ref> After his appointment, Maximian was assigned the government of the West and dispatched to fight the rebel [[Bagaudae]] in Gaul while Diocletian returned to the East.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 6; Southern, 137; Williams, 45&ndash;46.</ref>

The dual system evidently worked well. About 287, the two rulers' relationship was re-defined in religious terms, with Diocletian assuming the title ''Iovius'' and Maximian ''Herculius''.<ref>Corcoran, "Before Constantine", 40; Liebeschuetz, ''Continuity and Change'', 235&ndash;52, 240–43; Odahl, 43&ndash;44; Rees, ''Layers of Loyalty'', 32&ndash;33.</ref> The titles were pregnant with symbolism: Diocletian-[[Jupiter (mythology)|Jove]] had the dominant role of planning and commanding; Maximian-[[Hercules]] the [[hero]]ic role of completing assigned tasks.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 11&ndash;12; Corcoran, "Before Constantine", 40; Odahl, 43; Rees, ''Layers of Loyalty'', 32&ndash;33, 39, 42&ndash;52; Southern, 136&ndash;37; Williams, 58&ndash;59.</ref> Yet despite the symbolism, the emperors were "gods" in the [[Imperial cult (ancient Rome)|Imperial cult]] tradition (although they may have been hailed as such in Imperial panegyrics). Instead, they were the gods' instruments, imposing the gods' will on earth.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 11.</ref> Once the rituals were over, Maximian assumed control of the government of the West and dispatched to Gaul to fight the rebels known as [[Bagaudae]] while Diocletian returned to the East.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 6; Southern, 137; Williams, 45&ndash;46.</ref>


==Early campaigns in Gaul and Germany==
==Early campaigns in Gaul and Germany==
The Bagaudae are obscure figures, referred to only in passing in the ancient sources. The 285 uprising is their first appearance in the historical record.<ref>Rees, ''Layers of Loyalty'', 29.</ref> The fourth-century historian [[Eutropius]] describes them as rural people, naming [[Aelianus (rebel)|Amandus and Aelianus]] as their leaders, while Aurelius Victor calls them bandits.<ref>Eutropius,, ''Brev''. 9.20; Aurelius Victor, ''de Caesaribus'', 39.17, quoted in Rees, ''Layers of Loyalty'', 29&ndash;30.</ref> It has been suggested that the rebels were not merely peasants, but combatants for Gallic political autonomy, or supporters of the recently deposed Carus (a native of [[Gallia Narbonensis]], in what is now southern [[France]]). Were this the case, supporters of Amandus and Aelianus would in fact be defecting imperial troops, not brigands.<ref>Potter, 281&ndash;82.</ref> Despite being poorly equipped, poorly led, and badly trained, and not therefore much of a challenge to trained Roman legionaries, Diocletian certainly thought that the Bagaudae were enough of a threat to need an emperor to combat them.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 6; Barnes, ''New Empire'', 10; Rees, ''Layers of Loyalty'', 30; Southern, 137; Williams, 45&ndash;46.</ref>
The Bagaudae of Gaul are obscure figures, appearing fleetingly in the ancient sources, with their 285 uprising being their first appearance.<ref>Rees, ''Layers of Loyalty'', 29.</ref> The fourth-century historian [[Eutropius]] described them as rural people under the leadership of [[Aelianus (rebel)|Amandus and Aelianus]], while Aurelius Victor called them bandits.<ref>Eutropius, ''Brev''. 9.20; Aurelius Victor, ''de Caesaribus'', 39.17, quoted in Rees, ''Layers of Loyalty'', 29&ndash;30.</ref> The historian David S. Potter suggests that they were more than peasants, seeking either Gallic political autonomy or reinstatement of the recently deposed Carus (a native of [[Gallia Narbonensis]], in what would become southern [[France]]): in this case, they would be defecting imperial troops, not brigands.<ref>Potter, 281&ndash;82.</ref> Although poorly equipped, led and trained and therefore a poor match for Roman legions – Diocletian certainly considered the Bagaudae sufficient threat to merit an emperor to counter them.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 6; Barnes, ''New Empire'', 10; Rees, ''Layers of Loyalty'', 30; Southern, 137; Williams, 45&ndash;46.</ref>


Maximian traveled to Gaul and fought the Bagaudae late in the summer of 285.<ref>Barnes, ''New Empire'', 57.</ref> Details for the campaign are sparse, and the historical sources only extol Maximian's virtues and successes, never provide tactical information. The 289 [[Panegyrici Latini|panegyric]] to Maximian states only that Maximian dealt with the rebels using a blend of harshness and leniency.<ref name="S137">Southern, 137.</ref> Because the campaign was against the empire's own citizens most found it unpleasant to remember, and it was not recorded in any [[Victory title|titles]] or official [[Roman triumph|triumphs]]. In reference to the campaign, Maximian's panegyrist declares: "I pass quickly over this episode, for I see in your magnanimity you would rather forget this victory than celebrate it."<ref>''Panegyrici Latini'' 10(2), quoted in Williams, 46; Southern, 137.</ref> By the end of the year the scale of the revolt had been significantly reduced, and Maximian shifted the concentration of his forces to the Rhine frontier.<ref>Southern, 138; Williams, 46.</ref> Stability on the Rhine, a condition missing for most of the third century, contributed to Maximian's success.<ref>Southern, 137&ndash;38.</ref>
Maximian traveled to Gaul, engaging the Bagaudae late in the summer of 285.<ref>Barnes, ''New Empire'', 57.</ref> Details of the campaign are sparse and provide no tactical detail: the historical sources dwell only on Maximian's virtues and victories. The 289 [[Panegyrici Latini|panegyric]] to Maximian records that the rebels were defeated with a blend of harshness and leniency.<ref name="S137">Southern, 137.</ref> As the campaign was against the empire's own citizens, and therefore distasteful, it went unrecorded in [[Victory title|titles]] and official [[Roman triumph|triumphs]]. Indeed, Maximian's panegyrist declares: "I pass quickly over this episode, for I see in your magnanimity you would rather forget this victory than celebrate it."<ref>''Panegyrici Latini'' 10(2), quoted in Williams, 46; Southern, 137.</ref> By the end of the year, the revolt had significantly abated, and Maximian moved the bulk of his forces to the Rhine frontier, heralding a period of stability.<ref>Southern, 139&ndash;138; Williams, 46.</ref>


Maximian did not eliminate the Bagaudae quickly enough to avoid a Germanic reaction. Two barbarian armies, one of [[Burgundians]] and [[Alamanni]], another of Chaibones and [[Heruli]], forded the Rhine and entered Gaul in the autumn of 285.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 6; Barnes, ''New Empire'', 57; Rees, ''Layers of Loyalty'', 31.</ref> The first of these was left to die of disease and hunger, and Maximian intercepted and defeated the second.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 6.</ref> He then established his headquarters on the Rhine in preparation for future campaigns,<ref>Williams, 46.</ref> either at Moguntiacum ([[Mainz]], [[Germany]]), Augusta Treverorum ([[Trier]], Germany), or Colonia Agrippina ([[Cologne]], Germany).<ref>Potter, 282&ndash;83. Potter and Barnes (''New Empire'', 56) favor Trier; Williams (''Diocletian'', 46) favors Mainz.</ref>
Maximian did not put down the Bagaudae swiftly enough to avoid a Germanic reaction. In the autumn of 285, two barbarian armies one of [[Burgundians]] and [[Alamanni]], the other of Chaibones and [[Heruli]] forded the Rhine and entered Gaul.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 6; Barnes, ''New Empire'', 57; Rees, ''Layers of Loyalty'', 31.</ref> The first army was left to die of disease and hunger, while Maximian intercepted and defeated the second.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 6.</ref> He then established a Rhine headquarters in preparation for future campaigns,<ref>Williams, 46.</ref> either at Moguntiacum ([[Mainz]], [[Germany]]), Augusta Treverorum ([[Trier]], Germany), or Colonia Agrippina ([[Cologne]], Germany).<ref>Potter, 282&ndash;83. Potter and Barnes (''New Empire'', 56) favor Trier; Williams (''Diocletian'', 46) favors Mainz.</ref>


==Carausius==
==Carausius==
{{seealso|Carausius|Carausian Revolt}}
{{seealso|Carausius|Carausian Revolt}}
[[Image:romanantefix.jpg‎|thumb|right|A Roman [[Ante-fixae|antefix]] roof tile showing the badge and standard of [[Legio XX Valeria Victrix]], one of the legions that joined Carausius' rebellion]]
[[Image:romanantefix.jpg‎|thumb|right|A Roman [[Ante-fixae|antefix]] roof tile showing the badge and standard of [[Legio XX Valeria Victrix]], one of the legions that joined Carausius' rebellion]]
Although most of Gaul was pacified, regions bordering the [[English Channel]] still suffered from [[Franks|Frankish]] and [[Saxons|Saxon]] [[piracy]]. The Emperors Probus and Carinus had begun work on fortifications along the so-called "[[Saxon Shore]]", but much was still left to be done.<ref>Southern, 138; Williams, 46.</ref> Archaeological evidence from [[Dover]] and [[Boulogne]] indicates nothing that could be called a naval base, and therefore no real attempt to rid the region of pirates, in the fifteen years before 285.<ref>Potter, 284.</ref> In response to the continuing crisis, Maximian appointed [[Carausius|Mausaeus Carausius]], a [[Menapii|Menapian]] from [[Germania Inferior]] (southern and western [[Netherlands]]) to command the Channel and to clear it of raiders.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 6; Barnes, ''New Empire'', 57.</ref> Carausius performed his work competently, and by the end of 285 was already capturing pirate ships in great numbers.<ref>Southern, 138; Williams, 46&ndash;47.</ref>
Although most of Gaul was pacified, regions bordering the [[English Channel]] still suffered from [[Franks|Frankish]] and [[Saxons|Saxon]] [[piracy]]. The emperors Probus and Carinus had begun to fortify the [[Saxon Shore]], but much remained to be done.<ref>Southern, 138; Williams, 46.</ref> For example, there is no archaeological evidence of naval bases at [[Dover]] and [[Boulogne]] during 270–285.<ref>Potter, 284.</ref> In response to the pirate problem, Maximian appointed [[Carausius|Mausaeus Carausius]], a [[Menapii|Menapian]] from [[Germania Inferior]] (southern and western [[Netherlands]]) to command the Channel and to clear it of raiders.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 6; Barnes, ''New Empire'', 57.</ref> Carausius did well and, by the end of 285, was capturing pirate ships in great numbers.<ref>Southern, 138; Williams, 46&ndash;47.</ref>


Reports soon came back to Maximian that Carausius was keeping the pirates' goods for himself, refusing to relinquish them to either the population at large or the imperial treasury.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 6&ndash;7; Potter, 283&ndash;84; Southern, 137&ndash;41; Williams, 47.</ref> He would confront raiders only after their plundering had finished, and the wealth recovered was never accounted for.<ref>Southern, 139; Williams, 47.</ref> Maximian ordered that Carausius be arrested and executed, prompting Carausius to flee the continent. His support among the British was strong, and at least two British legions ([[Legio II Augusta|II Augusta]] and [[Legio XX Valeria Victrix|XX Valeria Victrix]]) defected to him, as did some or all of a legion near Boulogne (probably [[Legio XXX Ulpia Victrix|XXX Ulpia Victrix]]).<ref>Potter, 284; Southern, 139&ndash;40; Williams, 47. Most of the information for the legions under Carausius' control comes from his coinage. Strangely, [[Legio VI Victrix]] from [[Eboracum]] ([[York]], United Kingdom), which, for geographical regions, should have been included in the legions Carausius had control over, generally is not (Southern, 332). The ''Panegyrici Latini'' 8(4)12.1 admits of one continental legion joining him, which is probably the XXX Ulpia Victrix (Potter, 650).</ref> Carausius quickly eliminated the few remaining loyalists in his army and declared himself Augustus.<ref name="W47">Williams, 47.</ref>
Maximian soon heard that Carausius was waiting until the pirates had finished plundering before attacking and that their booty was going into Carausius' pockets instead of to the population at large or into the imperial treasury.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 6&ndash;7; Potter, 283&ndash;84; Southern, 137&ndash;41; Williams, 47.</ref> Maximian ordered Carausius' arrest and execution, prompting him to flee the continent to Britain. Carausius' support among the British was strong, and at least two British legions ([[Legio II Augusta|II Augusta]] and [[Legio XX Valeria Victrix|XX Valeria Victrix]]) defected to him, as did some or all of a legion near Boulogne (probably [[Legio XXX Ulpia Victrix|XXX Ulpia Victrix]]).<ref>Potter, 284; Southern, 139&ndash;40; Williams, 47. Most of the information for the legions under Carausius' control comes from his coinage. Strangely, [[Legio VI Victrix]] from [[Eboracum]] ([[York]], United Kingdom), which, for geographical regions, should have been included in the legions Carausius had control over, generally is not (Southern, 332). The ''Panegyrici Latini'' 8(4)12.1 admits one continental legion joined him, probably the XXX Ulpia Victrix (Potter, 650).</ref> Carausius quickly eliminated the few remaining loyalists in his army and declared himself Augustus.<ref name="W47">Williams, 47.</ref>


There was little Maximian could do about the revolt. He was occupied on the continent with the [[Heruli]] and the Franks, and had given Carausius control of the fleet. Carausius meanwhile strengthened his position, enlarging his fleet, enlisting Frankish mercenaries, and ensuring his troops were paid well.<ref name="W47"/> By the autumn of 286 Britain and much of northwestern Gaul had joined Carausius' secessionist state, and he soon had the entire Channel coast within his domain.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 7; Southern, 140.</ref> He declared himself the leader of an independent British state, an ''Imperium Britanniarum''. He began printing currency of a markedly higher purity than that of Maximian and Diocletian, earning him the support of British and Gallic merchants.<ref>Williams, 47&ndash;48.</ref> Maximian's troops were vulnerable to Carausius' influence and wealth.<ref>Potter, 284; Williams, 61&ndash;62.</ref>
Maximian could do little about the revolt. He had no fleet he had given it to Casausius and was busy quelling the [[Heruli]] and the Franks. Meanwhile, Carausius strengthened his position by enlarging his fleet, enlisting Frankish mercenaries, and paying his troops well.<ref name="W47"/> By the autumn of 286, Britain, much of northwestern Gaul, and the entire Channel coast, was under his control.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 7; Southern, 140.</ref> Casausius declared himself head of an independent British state, an ''Imperium Britanniarum'' and issued coin of a markedly higher purity than that of Maximian and Diocletian, earning the support of British and Gallic merchants.<ref>Williams, 47&ndash;48.</ref> Even Maximian's troops were vulnerable to Carausius' influence and wealth.<ref>Potter, 284; Williams, 61&ndash;62.</ref>


==Maximian appointed Augustus==
==Maximian appointed Augustus==
Spurred by the crisis with Carausius, Maximian took the title of [[Augustus (honorific)|Augustus]]<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 7; Bleckmann; Corcoran, "Before Constantine", 40; Potter, 282; Southern, 141&ndash;42; Williams, 48.</ref> on [[April 1]] [[286]].<ref name="AUGDATE"/> The title put Maximian on an equal level with Carausius, making the contest between Britain and the Continent one between two Augusti, rather than between an Augustus and a Caesar. In imperial propaganda, Maximian was proclaimed Diocletian's brother, equal in authority and prestige.<ref>Williams, 48.</ref> Diocletian could not have been present at Maximian's appointment,<ref>Potter, 282, 649. Diocletian would have been somewhere between [[Byzantium]] ([[Istanbul]], [[Turkey]]), where he is attested for [[March 22]] [[286]] and [[Tiberias]], where he is attested from [[May 31]] [[286]] through [[August 31]] (Barnes, ''New Empire'', 50&ndash;51; Potter, 282, 649).</ref> causing some to suggest that Maximian usurped the title, and was only later recognized by Diocletian in hopes of avoiding civil war. This suggestion has not won much support.<ref>Potter, 282, 649.</ref> Despite the great distance between the emperors, Diocletian trusted Maximian enough to invest him with imperial powers, and Maximian still respected Diocletian enough to act in accordance with his will.<ref>Potter, 282; Williams, 49.</ref>


Spurred by the crisis with Carausius, on [[April 1]] [[286]],<ref name="AUGDATE"/> Maximian took the title of [[Augustus (honorific)|Augustus]]<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 7; Bleckmann; Corcoran, "Before Constantine", 40; Potter, 282; Southern, 141&ndash;42; Williams, 48.</ref> This gave him the same status as Carausius so the clash was between two Augusti, rather than between an Augustus and a Caesar – and, in imperial propaganda, Maximian was proclaimed Diocletian's brother, his equal in authority and prestige.<ref>Williams, 48.</ref> Diocletian could not have been present at Maximian's appointment,<ref>Potter, 282, 649. Diocletian would have been somewhere between [[Byzantium]] ([[Istanbul]], [[Turkey]]), where he is attested for [[March 22]] [[286]] and [[Tiberias]], where he is attested from [[May 31]] [[286]] through [[August 31]] (Barnes, ''New Empire'', 50&ndash;51; Potter, 282, 649).</ref> causing Seeck to suggest that Maximian usurped the title and was only later recognized by Diocletian in hopes of avoiding civil war. This suggestion has not won much support, and the historian William Leadbetter has recently refuted it.<ref>Potter, 282, 649.</ref> Despite the physical distance between the emperors, Diocletian trusted Maximian enough to invest him with imperial powers, and Maximian still respected Diocletian enough to act in accordance with his will.<ref>Potter, 282; Williams, 49.</ref>
Theoretically, there was no division in Roman government as a result of the dual imperial office. Practical divisions took place&mdash;each emperor had his own court, army, and official residences&mdash;but these were matters of practicality, not substance. Imperial propaganda from 287 on insists on a singular and indivisible Rome, a ''patrimonium indivisum''.<ref>Potter, 283; Williams, 49, 65.</ref> As the panegyrist of 289 declares to Maximian: "So it is that this great empire is a communal possession for both of you, without any discord, nor would we endure there to be any dispute between you, but plainly you hold the state in equal measure as once those two [[Heracleidae]], the [[Kings of Sparta|Spartan Kings]], had done."<ref>''Panegyrici Latini'' 10(2)9.4, quoted in Potter, 283.</ref> Legal rulings were issued in both emperors' names, the same coins were issued in both parts of the empire, and imperial celebrations were held in the name of both emperors.<ref>Potter, 283; Williams, 49, 65.</ref> Diocletian sometimes issued commands to Maximian's province of Africa; Maximian could presumably do the same for Diocletian's territory.<ref>Potter, 283.</ref>

In theory, the Roman Empire was not divided by the dual imperium. Though divisions did take place &ndash; each emperor had his own court, army, and official residences &ndash; these were matters of practicality, not substance. Imperial propaganda from 287 on insists on a singular and indivisible Rome, a ''patrimonium indivisum''.<ref>Potter, 283; Williams, 49, 65.</ref> As the panegyrist of 289 declares to Maximian: "So it is that this great empire is a communal possession for both of you, without any discord, nor would we endure there to be any dispute between you, but plainly you hold the state in equal measure as once those two [[Heracleidae]], the [[Kings of Sparta|Spartan Kings]], had done."<ref>''Panegyrici Latini'' 10(2)9.4, quoted in Potter, 283.</ref> Legal rulings were given and imperial celebrations took place in both emperors' names; the same coins were issued in both parts of the empire.<ref>Potter, 283; Williams, 49, 65.</ref> Diocletian sometimes issued commands to Maximian's province of Africa; Maximian could presumably do the same for Diocletian's territory.<ref>Potter, 283.</ref>


==Campaigns against Rhenish tribes==
==Campaigns against Rhenish tribes==
===Campaigns in 286 and 287===
===Campaigns in 286 and 287===
Realizing that he could not immediately suppress Carausius, Maximian campaigned against tribes beyond the Rhine instead.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 7; Corcoran, "Before Constantine", 40.</ref> The Rhenish tribes were probably greater threats to Gallic peace than Carausius in any case, and Carausius had Frankish supporters in the region.<ref>Southern, 141; Williams, 50.</ref> Maximian had many enemies along the Rhine, but these peoples were more often in dispute amongst themselves than in combat with the empire.<ref name="W50">Williams, 50.</ref> There are few clear dates for Maximian's campaigns on the Rhine, beyond a general range from 285 to 288.<ref>Southern, 142. Barnes' ''New Empire'' records five dates for the period: the first, [[February 10]] [[286]] at Milan (''Codex Justinianus'' 8.53(54).6; ''Fragmenta Vaticana'' 282); [[June 21]] [[286]] at Mainz (''Fragmenta Vaticana'' 271); [[January 1]] [[287]] Trier or Cologne or Mainz (date of consular assumption, ''Panegyrici Latini'' 10(2).6.2 ff.); and 287, his "expedition across the Rhine" (''Panegyrici Latini'' 10(2).7.1ff.) (Barnes, ''New Empire'', 57).</ref> During his reception of the consular ''fasces'' on [[January 1]] [[287]], Maximian was disturbed by news of a barbarian raid. Laying aside his toga and taking up his armor, Maximian marched against the barbarians and, although the barbarians were not entirely dispersed, celebrated a victory for this action when he returned to Gaul later in the year.<ref name="BCE7"/>


Maximian realized that he could not immediately suppress Carausius and campaigned instead against Rhenish tribes.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 7; Corcoran, "Before Constantine", 40.</ref> These tribes were probably greater threats to Gallic peace than Carausius in any case and included many supporters of Carausius.<ref>Southern, 141; Williams, 50.</ref> Although Maximian had many enemies along the river, they were more often in dispute with each other than in combat with the empire.<ref name="W50">Williams, 50.</ref> Few clear dates survive for Maximian's campaigns on the Rhine beyond a general range of 285 to 288.<ref>Southern, 142. Barnes' ''New Empire'' records five dates for the period: the first, [[February 10]] [[286]] at Milan (''Codex Justinianus'' 8.53(54).6; ''Fragmenta Vaticana'' 282); [[June 21]] [[286]] at Mainz (''Fragmenta Vaticana'' 271); [[January 1]] [[287]] Trier or Cologne or Mainz (date of consular assumption, ''Panegyrici Latini'' 10(2).6.2 ff.); and 287, his "expedition across the Rhine" (''Panegyrici Latini'' 10(2).7.1ff.) (Barnes, ''New Empire'', 57).</ref>
Believing the Burgundian and Alemanni tribes living in the [[Moselle]]-[[Vosges]] region to be the greatest threat, Maximian targeted them first. He used [[scorched earth]] tactics in his campaign against them, laying waste to their territories and reducing their numbers through famine and disease. After the Burgundians and Alemanni, Maximian campaigned against the weaker Heruli and Chaibones. Maximian maneuvered them into one location and defeated them in a single battle. He fought in person, riding along the front of the battle line until the Germanic forces broke. Roman forces pursued fleeing remnants of the tribal armies and destroyed them completely. Having weakened his enemies through starvation,<ref name="W50"/> Maximian launched a great invasion across the Rhine.<ref>Barnes, ''New Empire'', 57; Williams, 50.</ref> He moved deep into Germanic territory, spreading destruction in his enemies' homelands,<ref name="W50"/> and demonstrating the force of Roman arms.<ref name="BCE7"/> By the winter of 287 he held the advantage, and the Rhenish lands were free of Germanic tribesmen.<ref name="W50"/>
While receiving the consular ''fasces'' on [[January 1]] [[287]], Maximian was interrupted by news of a barbarian raid. Doffing his toga and donning his armor, he marched against the barbarians and, although they were not entirely dispersed, he celebrated a victory in Gaul later that year.<ref name="BCE7"/>

Maximian believed the Burgundian and Alemanni tribes of the [[Moselle]]-[[Vosges]] region to be the greatest threat, so he targeted them first. He campaigned using [[scorched earth]] tactics, laying waste to their land and reducing their numbers through famine and disease. After the Burgundians and Alemanni, Maximian moved against the weaker Heruli and Chaibones. He cornered and defeated them in a single battle. He fought in person, riding along the battle line until the Germanic forces broke. Roman forces pursued the fleeing tribal armies and routed them. With his enemies from starvation,<ref name="W50"/> Maximian launched a great invasion across the Rhine.<ref>Barnes, ''New Empire'', 57; Williams, 50.</ref> He moved deep into Germanic territory, bringing destruction to his enemies' homelands,<ref name="W50"/> and demonstrating the superiority of Roman arms.<ref name="BCE7"/> By the winter of 287, he had the advantage and the Rhenish lands were free of Germanic tribesmen.<ref name="W50"/>


[[Image:Const.chlorus02 pushkin.jpg|thumb|right|[[Constantius Chlorus|Flavius Constantius]], Maximian's [[praetorian prefect]] and husband to his daughter [[Flavia Maximiana Theodora|Theodora]].]]
[[Image:Const.chlorus02 pushkin.jpg|thumb|right|[[Constantius Chlorus|Flavius Constantius]], Maximian's [[praetorian prefect]] and husband to his daughter [[Flavia Maximiana Theodora|Theodora]].]]


===Joint campaign against the Alamanni===
===Joint campaign against the Alamanni===
The following spring, as Maximian made preparations for dealing with Carausius, Diocletian returned from the East.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 7; Southern, 142&ndash;43; Williams, 50.</ref> The emperors met that year, but neither date nor place are known with certainty.<ref>Barnes, ''New Empire'', 57; Rees, ''Layers of Loyalty'', 31.</ref> They probably agreed on a joint campaign against the Alamanni and a naval expedition against Carausius.<ref>Rees, ''Layers of Loyalty'', 31; Southern, 142&ndash;43; Williams, 50. Barnes (''Constantine and Eusebius'', 7) dates the meeting to after the campaign against the Alamanni.</ref> During the campaign against the Alamanni later in the year, Maximian invaded Germany from the south. He led a surprise invasion of the [[Agri Decumates]], a region between the upper Rhine and upper Danube deep within Alamanni territory. Meanwhile Diocletian invaded Germany via [[Raetia]]. Both emperors burned crops and food supplies as they went, destroying the Germans' means of sustenance.<ref>Southern, 142&ndash;43; Williams, 50.</ref> Their actions resulted in large swathes of territory being added to the empire and allowed Maximian's build-up to proceed without further disturbance.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 7; Corcoran, "Before Constantine", 40; Southern, 143; Williams, 50.</ref> In the aftermath of the war, towns along the Rhine were rebuilt, bridgeheads created on the eastern banks at such places as Mainz and Cologne, and a military frontier was established, comprising forts, roads, and fortified towns. A military highway through Tornacum ([[Tournai]], [[Belgium]]), Bavacum ([[Bavay]], France), Atuatuca Tungrorum ([[Tongeren]], Belgium), Mosae Trajectum ([[Maastricht]], Netherlands), and Cologne connected points along the frontier.<ref name="W5051">Williams, 50&ndash;51.</ref>
The following spring, as Maximian made preparations for dealing with Carausius, Diocletian returned from the East.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 7; Southern, 142&ndash;43; Williams, 50.</ref> The emperors met that year, but neither date nor place is known with certainty.<ref>Barnes, ''New Empire'', 57; Rees, ''Layers of Loyalty'', 31.</ref> They probably agreed on a joint campaign against the Alamanni and a naval expedition against Carausius.<ref>Rees, ''Layers of Loyalty'', 31; Southern, 142&ndash;43; Williams, 50. Barnes (''Constantine and Eusebius'', 7) dates the meeting to after the campaign against the Alamanni.</ref>
Later in the year, Maximian led a surprise invasion of the [[Agri Decumates]] &ndash; a region between the upper Rhine and upper Danube deep within Alamanni territory &ndash; while Diocletian invaded Germany via [[Raetia]]. Both emperors burned crops and food supplies as they went, destroying the Germans' means of sustenance.<ref>Southern, 142&ndash;43; Williams, 50.</ref> They added large swathes of territory to the empire and allowed Maximian's build-up to proceed without further disturbance.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 7; Corcoran, "Before Constantine", 40; Southern, 143; Williams, 50.</ref> In the aftermath of the war, towns along the Rhine were rebuilt, bridgeheads created on the eastern banks at such places as Mainz and Cologne, and a military frontier was established, comprising forts, roads, and fortified towns. A military highway through Tornacum ([[Tournai]], [[Belgium]]), Bavacum ([[Bavay]], France), Atuatuca Tungrorum ([[Tongeren]], Belgium), Mosae Trajectum ([[Maastricht]], Netherlands), and Cologne connected points along the frontier.<ref name="W5051">Williams, 50&ndash;51.</ref>


===Constantius, Gennobaudes, and resettlement===
===Constantius, Gennobaudes, and resettlement===
After the Alamannic campaign, Maximian appointed his praetorian prefect [[Constantius Chlorus|Flavius Constantius]]; husband of Maximian's daughter [[Flavia Maximiana Theodora|Theodora]], to lead a campaign against the Franks allied with Carausius. These Franks controlled the Rhine [[estuary|estuaries]], preventing attacks against Carausius by sea. Constantius moved north through their territory, wreaking havoc, and reaching the [[North Sea]], causing the Franks to sue for peace. In the subsequent agreement Maximian allied himself with the deposed Frankish king Gennobaudes, reinstating him as king of the Franks.<ref name="BCE7"/> In return, Maximian gained the patronage of Gennobaudes and, with lesser Frankish chiefs swearing loyalty to Gennobaudes, cemented Roman dominance in the region.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 7; Williams, 51.</ref>


In early 288, Maximian appointed his praetorian prefect [[Constantius Chlorus|Flavius Constantius]], husband of Maximian's daughter [[Flavia Maximiana Theodora|Theodora]], to lead a campaign against Carausius' Frankish allies. These Franks controlled the Rhine [[estuary|estuaries]], thwarting sea-attacks against Carausius. Constantius moved north through their territory, wreaking havoc, and reaching the [[North Sea]]. The Franks sued for peace and in the subsequent settlement Maximian reinstated the deposed Frankish king Gennobaudes.<ref name="BCE7"/> Gennobaudes became Maximian's vassal and, with lesser Frankish chiefs in turn swearing loyalty to Gennobaudes, Roman regional dominance was assured.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 7; Williams, 51.</ref>
Maximian also allowed a settlement of [[Frisians]], [[Salian Franks]], [[Chamavi]] and other tribes along a strip of Roman territory, either between the Rhine and [[Waal (river)|Waal]] rivers from Noviomagus ([[Nijmegen]], Netherlands) to Traiectum ([[Utrecht (city)|Utrecht]], Netherlands)<ref name="W5051"/> or near Trier.<ref name="BCE7">Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 7.</ref> These tribes were allowed to settle there only so long as they recognized Roman dominance in the region. Their presence, in providing a ready pool of manpower and preventing the settlement of other Frankish tribes, meant that Maximian had established a buffer along the northern Rhine, reducing the need to deploy troops in the region.<ref name="W5051"/>

Maximian allowed a settlement of [[Frisians]], [[Salian Franks]], [[Chamavi]] and other tribes along a strip of Roman territory, either between the Rhine and [[Waal (river)|Waal]] rivers from Noviomagus ([[Nijmegen]], Netherlands) to Traiectum ([[Utrecht (city)|Utrecht]], Netherlands)<ref name="W5051"/> or near Trier.<ref name="BCE7">Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 7.</ref> These tribes were allowed to settle only on condition they acknowledged Roman dominance. Their presence, providing a ready pool of manpower and preventing the settlement of other Frankish tribes, gave Maximian a buffer along the northern Rhine and reduced his need to garrison the region.<ref name="W5051"/>


==Later campaigns in Britain and Gaul==
==Later campaigns in Britain and Gaul==
===Failed expedition against Carausius===
===Failed expedition against Carausius===
[[Image:Antoninianus Carausius leg4-RIC 0069v.jpg|thumb|right|[[Carausius]], rebel emperor of [[Roman Britain]]]]
[[Image:Antoninianus Carausius leg4-RIC 0069v.jpg|thumb|right|[[Carausius]], rebel emperor of [[Roman Britain]]]]
By 289, Maximian was prepared to launch a naval invasion against Carausius' Britain. Whatever happened in the following year, the plan was not a success. The panegyrist addressing Maximian in 289 believes the campaign will be a great success; the panegyrist of 291 makes no mention of the event.<ref>Southern, 143.</ref> Constantius' panegyrist suggests that his fleet was lost to a storm,<ref>''Panegyrici Latini'' 8(5)12.2; Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 7, 288; Potter, 284&ndash;85, 650; Southern, 143; Williams, 55.</ref> but this might simply be the panegyrist's attempt to play down the embarrassment of defeat.<ref>Southern, 143; Williams, 55.</ref> Diocletian broke off a tour of the Eastern provinces soon thereafter, perhaps after receiving news of Maximian's failure.<ref>Potter, 285; Southern, 144.</ref> Diocletian returned with haste to the West, reaching Emesa by [[May 10]] [[290]],<ref>''Codex Justinianus'' 9.41.9; Barnes, ''New Empire'', 51; Potter, 285, 650.</ref> and Sirmium on the Danube by [[July 1]] [[290]].<ref>''Codex Justinianus'' 6.30.6; Barnes, ''New Empire'', 52; Potter, 285, 650.</ref>
By 289, Maximian was prepared to invade Carausius' Britain but, for some reason, the plan failed. Maximian's panegyrist of 289 was optimistic about the campaign's prospects; but the panegyrist of 291 made no mention of it.<ref>Southern, 143.</ref> Constantius' panegyrist suggested that his fleet was lost to a storm,<ref>''Panegyrici Latini'' 8(5)12.2; Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 7, 288; Potter, 284&ndash;85, 650; Southern, 143; Williams, 55.</ref> but this might simply have been to diminish the embarrassment of defeat.<ref>Southern, 143; Williams, 55.</ref> Diocletian curtailed his Eastern province tour soon after, perhaps on learning of Maximian's failure.<ref>Potter, 285; Southern, 144.</ref> Diocletian returned in haste to the West, reaching Emesa by [[May 10]] [[290]],<ref>''Codex Justinianus'' 9.41.9; Barnes, ''New Empire'', 51; Potter, 285, 650.</ref> and Sirmium on the Danube by [[July 1]] [[290]].<ref>''Codex Justinianus'' 6.30.6; Barnes, ''New Empire'', 52; Potter, 285, 650.</ref>


Diocletian met Maximian in Milan during the winter of 290&ndash;91, either in late December 290 or January 291.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 8; Potter, 285.</ref> The meeting was undertaken with a sense of solemn pageantry, and much of the emperors' time was spent making public appearances. A deputation from the Roman Senate met with the emperors, renewing that body's infrequent contact with the imperial office.<ref>''Panegyrici Latini'' 11(3)2.4, 8.1, 11.3&ndash;4, 12.2; Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 8, 288; Potter, 285, 650.</ref> People gathered in crowds to witness the emperors descend on the city.<ref>''Panegyrici Latini'' 11(3)10, quoted in Williams, 57.</ref> It has been surmised that the ceremonies were arranged to demonstrate Diocletian's continuing support for his faltering colleague. Matters of politics and war were discussed in secret,<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 8; Potter, 285, 288; Rees, ''Layers of Loyalty'', 70.</ref> and it is possible that expansion of the imperial college to include four emperors (the [[Tetrarchy]]), was discussed as well.<ref>Potter, 285; Rees, ''Layers of Loyalty'', 69.</ref> The emperors would not meet again until 303.<ref>Potter, 285.</ref>
Diocletian met Maximian in Milan either in late December 290 or January 291.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 8; Potter, 285.</ref> Crowds gathered to witness the emperors descend on the city and the emperors devoted much time to public pageantry.<ref>''Panegyrici Latini'' 11(3)10, quoted in Williams, 57.</ref> Potter, among others, has surmised that the ceremonies were arranged to demonstrate Diocletian's continuing support for his faltering colleague. The rulers discussed matters of politics and war in secret,<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 8; Potter, 285, 288; Rees, ''Layers of Loyalty'', 69.</ref> and they may have considered the idea of expanding the imperial college to include four emperors (the [[Tetrarchy]]).<ref>Potter, 285; Rees, ''Layers of Loyalty'', 69.</ref> Meanwhile, a deputation from the Roman Senate met with the rulers and renewed their infrequent contact with the imperial office.<ref>''Panegyrici Latini'' 11(3)2.4, 8.1, 11.3&ndash;4, 12.2; Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 8, 288; Potter, 285, 650.</ref> The emperors would not meet again until 303.<ref>Potter, 285.</ref>


Following Maximian's failed attempt at forming an invasion fleet in 289, an uneasy cease-fire with Carausius began. Maximian did not attempt to overturn Carausius' rule in Britain or on the continent, although the emperors still refused to grant the secessionist state formal legitimacy. For his part, Carausius did not expand his territories beyond the Continental coast of Gaul.<ref>Williams, 55&ndash;56, 62.</ref> Diocletian would not long tolerate such an affront to his dignity, however. Faced with Carausius' secession and further challenges on the Egyptian, Syrian, and Danubian borders, he realized that two emperors were insufficient to manage the empire.<ref>Williams, 62&ndash;64.</ref> On [[March 1]] [[293]] at Milan, Maximian appointed Constantius to the office of Caesar.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 8&ndash;9; Barnes, ''New Empire'', 4, 36&ndash;37; Potter, 288; Southern, 146; Williams, 64&ndash;65.</ref> On either the same day or a month later, Diocletian would do the same for [[Galerius]], thus establishing the "Tetrarchy", or "rule of four".<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 8&ndash;9; Barnes, ''New Empire'', 4, 38; Potter, 288; Southern, 146; Williams, 64&ndash;65.</ref> Constantius was made to understand that he must succeed where Maximian had failed: he needed to defeat Carausius.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 8, 15; Williams, 71.</ref>
Following Maximian's failure to invade in 289, an uneasy truce with Carausius began. Maximian tolerated Carausius' rule in Britain and on the continent but refused to grant the secessionist state formal legitimacy. For his part, Carausius was content with his territories beyond the Continental coast of Gaul.<ref>Williams, 55&ndash;56, 62.</ref> However, Diocletian would not long put up with such an affront to his dignity. Faced with Carausius' secession and further challenges on the Egyptian, Syrian, and Danubian borders, he realized that two emperors were insufficient to manage the empire.<ref>Williams, 62&ndash;64.</ref> On [[March 1]] [[293]] at Milan, Maximian appointed Constantius to the office of Caesar.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 8&ndash;9; Barnes, ''New Empire'', 4, 36&ndash;37; Potter, 288; Southern, 146; Williams, 64&ndash;65.</ref> On either the same day or a month later, Diocletian did the same for [[Galerius]], thus establishing the "Tetrarchy", or "rule of four".<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 8&ndash;9; Barnes, ''New Empire'', 4, 38; Potter, 288; Southern, 146; Williams, 64&ndash;65.</ref> Constantius was made to understand that he must succeed where Maximian had failed and defeat Carausius.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 8, 15; Williams, 71.</ref>


===Campaign against Allectus===
===Campaign against Allectus===
[[Image:Quinarius Allectus galley-RIC 0128.2.jpg|thumb|right|[[Allectus]], Carausius' successor]]
[[Image:Quinarius Allectus galley-RIC 0128.2.jpg|thumb|right|[[Allectus]], Carausius' successor]]
Constantius met expectations quickly and efficiently, and by 293 had expelled Carausian forces from northern Gaul. In the same year,
Constantius fulfilled his duties quickly and efficiently, expelling Carausian forces from northern Gaul in 293. Carausius was assassinated the same year, and replaced by his treasurer, [[Allectus]].<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 15; Potter, 288; Rees, ''Layers of Loyalty'', 99; Southern, 149&ndash;50; Williams, 71&ndash;72.</ref> Constantius marched up the coast to the Rhine and Scheldt estuaries, and battled Carausius' Frankish allies. He won a victory and took the title ''Germanicus maximus''.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 15&ndash;16; Barnes, ''New Empire'', 255.</ref> Constantius spent the following years building a fleet in preparation for the invasion of Britain.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 15&ndash;16; Southern, 150.</ref> On receiving news of the invasion plans Maximian, who had remained in Italy since the appointment of Constantius, returned to Gaul in the summer of 296.<ref>Barnes, ''New Empire'', 58&ndash;59.</ref> He defended the Rhenish frontiers against Carausius' Frankish allies while Constantius launched his invasion of Britain.<ref>Barnes, ''New Empire'', 59; Southern, 150; Williams, 73.</ref> Allectus was killed on the [[North Downs]] in battle with Constantius' praetorian prefect [[Julius Asclepiodotus|Asclepiodotus]]. Constantius had meanwhile landed near [[Dubris]] (Dover) and marched on to [[Roman London|Londinium]] ([[London]]).<ref>Southern, 150; Williams, 73&ndash;74.</ref> Britain's inhabitants greeted him as a liberator.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 16; Williams, 74.</ref>
Casausius was assassinated and replaced by his treasurer, [[Allectus]].<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 15; Potter, 288; Rees, ''Layers of Loyalty'', 99; Southern, 149&ndash;50; Williams, 71&ndash;72.</ref> Constantius marched up the coast to the Rhine and Scheldt estuaries where he was victorious over Carausius' Frankish allies, taking the title ''Germanicus maximus''.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 15&ndash;16; Barnes, ''New Empire'', 255.</ref> His sights now set on Britain, Constantius spent the following years building an invasion fleet.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 15&ndash;16; Southern, 150.</ref> Maximian, still in Italy after the appointment of Constantius, was appraised of the invasion plans and, in the summer of 296, returned to Gaul.<ref>Barnes, ''New Empire'', 58&ndash;59.</ref> There, he held the Rhenish frontiers against Carausius' Frankish allies while Constantius launched his invasion of Britain.<ref>Barnes, ''New Empire'', 59; Southern, 150; Williams, 73.</ref> Allectus was killed on the [[North Downs]] in battle with Constantius' praetorian prefect, [[Julius Asclepiodotus|Asclepiodotus]]. Constantius himself had landed near [[Dubris]] (Dover) and marched on [[Roman London|Londinium]] ([[London]]), whose citizens greeted him as a liberator.<ref>Southern, 150; Williams, 73&ndash;74; Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 16.</ref>


==Campaigns in North Africa==
==Campaigns in North Africa==
With Constantius' victorious return, Maximian was able to focus on the conflict in [[Mauretania]] ([[Northwest Africa]]).<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 16; Southern, 150; Williams, 75.</ref> As Roman authority weakened over the course of the third century, nomadic [[Berber]] tribes had harassed settlements in the region with increasingly severe consequences. In 289, the Governor of [[Mauretania Caesariensis]] (roughly modern [[Algeria]]) earned the region a temporary respite by moving a small army against the Bavares and [[Quinquegentiani]], but the raiders returned in the 290s. In 296, Maximian put together an army, drawing in [[Praetorian Guard|Praetorian cohorts]], troops from [[Aquileia]]n, Egyptian, and Danubian legions, Gallic and German [[Auxiliaries (Roman military)|auxiliaries]], and [[Thrace|Thracian]] recruits.<ref name="W75">Williams, 75.</ref> He advanced through Spain in the autumn of 296,<ref>Barnes, ''New Empire'', 59.</ref> and may have defended the region against raiding [[Moors]],<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 16.</ref> before crossing the [[Strait of Gibraltar]] into [[Mauretania Tingitana]] (roughly modern [[Morocco]]) to police the area against Frankish pirates.<ref name="W75"/>
With Constantius' victorious return, Maximian was able to focus on the conflict in [[Mauretania]] ([[Northwest Africa]]).<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 16; Southern, 150; Williams, 75.</ref> As Roman authority weakened during the third century, nomadic [[Berber]] tribes harassed settlements in the region with increasingly severe consequences. In 289, the governor of [[Mauretania Caesariensis]] (roughly modern [[Algeria]]) gained a temporary respite by pitting a small army against the Bavares and [[Quinquegentiani]], but the raiders soon returned. In 296, Maximian raised an army, from [[Praetorian Guard|Praetorian cohorts]], [[Aquileia]]n, Egyptian, and Danubian legionaries, Gallic and German [[Auxiliaries (Roman military)|auxiliaries]], and [[Thrace|Thracian]] recruits, advancing through Spain that autumn.<ref name="W75">Williams, 75.</ref><ref>Barnes, ''New Empire'', 59.</ref> He may have defended the region against raiding [[Moors]]<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 16.</ref> before crossing the [[Strait of Gibraltar]] into [[Mauretania Tingitana]] (roughly modern [[Morocco]]) to protect the area from Frankish pirates.<ref name="W75"/>


By March 297, Maximian had begun a bloody offensive against the Berbers. The campaign was lengthy, and Maximian spent the winter of 297&ndash;98 resting in [[Carthage]] before returning to the field.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 16; Barnes, ''New Empire'', 59.</ref> Not content to simply return them to homelands in the [[Atlas Mountains]] from which they could continue to wage war, Maximian pressed on into Berber territory. The terrain was unfavorable, and the Berbers were skilled at [[guerrilla warfare]], but Maximian pressed on. Apparently wishing to inflict as much punishment as possible on the tribes, he devastated previously secure land, killed as many as he could, and forced the remainder back into the [[Sahara]].<ref name="W75"/> His campaign was concluded by the spring of the following year, and on [[March 10]] [[298]], he made a triumphal entry into Carthage.<ref>Barnes, ''New Empire'', 59; Williams, 75.</ref> Inscriptions there record the people's thanks for Maximian, hailing him, in the same way Constantius had been on his entry to London, as ''redditor lucis aeternae'', "restorer of the eternal light".<ref name="W75"/> Maximian returned to Italy in 299 to celebrate another triumph in Rome.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 16; Barnes, ''New Empire'', 59.</ref>
By March 297, Maximian had begun a bloody offensive against the Berbers. The campaign was lengthy, and Maximian spent the winter of 297&ndash;298 resting in [[Carthage]] before returning to the field.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 16; Barnes, ''New Empire'', 59.</ref> Not content to drive them back into their homelands in the [[Atlas Mountains]] &ndash; from which they could continue to wage war &ndash; Maximian ventured deep into Berber territory. The terrain was unfavorable, and the Berbers were skilled at [[guerrilla warfare]], but Maximian pressed on. Apparently wishing to inflict as much punishment as possible on the tribes, he devastated previously secure land, killed as many as he could, and drove the remainder back into the [[Sahara]].<ref name="W75"/> His campaign was concluded by the spring of 298 and, on [[March 10]], he made a triumphal entry into Carthage.<ref>Barnes, ''New Empire'', 59; Williams, 75.</ref> Inscriptions there record the people's gratitude to Maximian, hailing him &ndash; as Constantius had been on his entry to London &ndash; as ''redditor lucis aeternae'' ("restorer of the eternal light").<ref name="W75"/> Maximian returned to Italy in 299 to celebrate another triumph in Rome.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 16; Barnes, ''New Empire'', 59.</ref>


==Leisure and retirement==
==Leisure and retirement==
After his Mauretanian campaign, Maximian lived a life of leisure in the north of Italy. He spent most of his time at palaces in Milan and Aquilea, leaving the tasks of war to his subordinate Constantius.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 16; Barnes, ''New Empire'', 56.</ref> Maximian was more aggressive in his relationship with the Senate than Constantius, and is alleged to have terrorized the institution, to the point of falsely charging and subsequently executing senators.<ref>Lactantius, ''DMP'' 8.4; Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 16.</ref> There is some corroboration for this: the prefect of Rome in 301/2 was disgraced and executed. Constantius, by contrast, kept up good relations with the senatorial aristocracy, and spent his time in active defense of the empire. He took up arms against the Franks in 300 or 301, and continued to campaign against Germanic tribes on the Upper Rhine in 302&ndash;304 while Maximian was at rest in Italy.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 16.</ref>
After his Mauretanian campaign, Maximian returned to the north of Italy, living a life of leisure in palaces in Milan and Aquilea, and leaving warfare to his subordinate Constantius.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 16; Barnes, ''New Empire'', 56.</ref> Maximian was more aggressive in his relationship with the Senate than Constantius, and Lactantius contends that he terrorized senators, to the point of falsely charging and subsequently executing several, including the prefect of Rome in 301/2.<ref>Lactantius, ''DMP'' 8.4; Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 16.</ref> In contrast, Constantius kept up good relations with the senatorial aristocracy and spent his time in active defense of the empire. He took up arms against the Franks in 300 or 301 and in 302 &ndash; while Maximian was resting in Italy &ndash; continued to campaign against Germanic tribes on the Upper Rhine.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 16.</ref>


Maximian was only disturbed from his rest in Aquileia and Milan to attend Diocletian's ''vicennalia'', the twenty year anniversary of his reign, in Rome in 303. Some evidence suggests that it was on this occasion that Diocletian exacted a promise from Maximian that they would retire together, leaving their titles as Augusti to the Caesars Constantius and Galerius.<ref>''Panegyrici Latini'' 7(6)15.16; Lactantius ''DMP'' 20.4; Potter, 340; Southern, 152, 336.</ref> Presumably, it was expected that Maximian's son Maxentius and Constantius' son Constantine, children raised in Nicomedia together, would become the new Caesars. Maximian might not have wished to retire, but as Diocletian had Maxentius under his authority in Nicomedia, there was little resistance to the plan. Maximian would receive one more moment of glory before the planned retirement by officiating over the [[Secular Games]] in 304.<ref>Potter, 340.</ref>
Maximian was only disturbed from his rest in 303 by Diocletian's ''vicennalia'', the 20-year anniversary of his reign, in Rome. Some evidence suggests that it was on then that Diocletian exacted a promise from Maximian to retire together, passing their titles as Augusti to the Caesars Constantius and Galerius.<ref>''Panegyrici Latini'' 7(6)15.16; Lactantius ''DMP'' 20.4; Potter, 340; Southern, 152, 336.</ref> Presumably Maximian's son Maxentius and Constantius' son Constantine &ndash; children raised in Nicomedia together &ndash; would then become the new Caesars. While Maximian might not have wished to retire, Diocletian was still in control and there was little resistance. Before retirement, Maximian would receive one final moment of glory by officiating at the [[Secular Games]] in 304.<ref>Potter, 340.</ref>


On [[May 1]], [[305]], Diocletian and Maximian retired together in separate ceremonies in Milan and Nicomedia. The plan was not entirely to Maximian's liking: perhaps because influence of Galerius, the arranged progression saw [[Flavius Valerius Severus|Severus]] and [[Maximinus]] rise to the office of Caesar, thus excluding Maxentius. The two newly appointed Caesars had long careers in the military, and were close to Galerius: Maximinus was his nephew, and Severus had been his colleague in the army.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 25&ndash;27; Williams, 191.</ref> Maximian would quickly sour to the new tetrarchy, which saw Galerius assume the dominant position Diocletian once held. Although he led the ceremony that proclaimed Severus Caesar, he was sufficiently dissatisfied with the new system to assist his son's rebellion against it within two years.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 25&ndash;27; Potter, 341&ndash;42.</ref> Diocletian retired to his homeland, to the expansive [[Diocletian's Palace|palace]] he had built in Dalmatia near Salona on the [[Adriatic Sea|Adriatic]]. Maximian retired to villas in [[Campania]] or [[Lucania]], where he lived a life of ease and luxury.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 27; Southern, 152.</ref> They were far from the political centers of the empire, but Diocletian and Maximian were close enough to remain in regular contact with each other.<ref>Southern, 152.</ref>
On [[May 1]], [[305]], in separate ceremonies in Milan and Nicomedia, Diocletian and Maximian retired simultaneously. The succession did not go not entirely to Maximian's liking: perhaps because of Galerius' influence, [[Flavius Valerius Severus|Severus]] and [[Maximinus]] were appointed Caesar, thus excluding Maxentius. Both the newly appointed Caesars had had long military careers and were close to Galerius: Severus was his nephew and Maximinus a former army comrade.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 25&ndash;27; Williams, 191.</ref> Maximian quickly soured to the new tetrarchy, which saw Galerius assume the dominant position Diocletian once held. Although Maximian led the ceremony that proclaimed Severus Caesar, within two years he was sufficiently dissatisfied to support his son's rebellion against the new regime.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 25&ndash;27; Potter, 341&ndash;42.</ref> Diocletian retired to the expansive [[Diocletian's Palace|palace]] he had built in his homeland, Dalmatia near Salona on the [[Adriatic Sea|Adriatic]]. Maximian retired to villas in [[Campania]] or [[Lucania]], where he lived a life of ease and luxury.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 27; Southern, 152.</ref> Although far from the political centers of the empire, Diocletian and Maximian remained close enough to stay in regular contact.<ref>Southern, 152.</ref>


==Maxentius' rebellion==
==Maxentius' rebellion==
After the death of Constantius on [[July 25]] [[306]], Constantine assumed the title of Augustus, an action which displeased Galerius who offered Constantine the title of Caesar instead. Constantine accepted, and the title of Augustus then went to Severus.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 27–28; Barnes, ''New Empire'', 5; Lenski, 61–62; Odahl, 78–79.</ref> Maxentius was jealous of Constantine's power and on [[October 28]] [[306]], he persuaded a cohort of imperial guardsmen to declare him emperor. Uncomfortable with sole leadership, Maxentius sent a set of imperial robes to Maximian, and saluted him as "Augustus for the second time".<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 30.</ref> Maximian would rule as a theoretical equal to Maxentius, but with less real power and a lower official rank.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 32.</ref> Galerius refused to recognize Maxentius, and sent Severus against him. The fact that many of Severus' soldiers had served under Maximian, along with Maxentius' bribes, resulted in most of Severus' army defecting to Maxentius. Severus fled to [[Ravenna]], which Maximian then put under siege. With the city strongly fortified, Maximian offered terms, which Severus accepted, resulting in his seizure and removal from power. Maximian brought him under guard to a public villa in southern Rome, where he was kept as a hostage. Galerius led a second force against Maxentius in the autumn of 307, but his forces again failed to take Rome, and he was forced to retreat north with his army mostly intact.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 30&ndash;31; Elliott, 41&ndash;42; Lenski, 62&ndash;63; Odahl, 86&ndash;87; Potter, 348&ndash;49.</ref>
After the death of Constantius on [[July 25]] [[306]], Constantine assumed the title of Augustus. This displeased Galerius, who instead offered Constantine the title of Caesar, which Constantine accepted. The title of Augustus then went to Severus.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 27–28; Barnes, ''New Empire'', 5; Lenski, 61–62; Odahl, 78–79.</ref> Maxentius was jealous of Constantine's power, and on [[October 28]] [[306]], he persuaded a cohort of imperial guardsmen to declare him emperor. Uncomfortable with sole leadership, Maxentius sent a set of imperial robes to Maximian and saluted him as "Augustus for the second time", offering him theoretic equal rule but less actual power and a lower rank.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 30–32.</ref>
Galerius refused to recognize Maxentius and sent Severus with an army to Rome to depose him. As many of Severus' soldiers had served under Maximian, and had taken Maxentius' bribes, most of the army defected to Maxentius. Severus fled to [[Ravenna]], which Maximian besieged. The city was strongly fortified so Maximian offered terms, which Severus accepted. Maximian then seized Severus and took him under guard to a public villa in southern Rome, where he was kept as a hostage. In the autumn of 307, Galerius led a second force against Maxentius but he again failed to take Rome, and retreated north with his army mostly intact.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 30&ndash;31; Elliott, 41&ndash;42; Lenski, 62&ndash;63; Odahl, 86&ndash;87; Potter, 348&ndash;49.</ref>


[[Image:Maxentius02 pushkin.jpg|left|thumb|upright|Dresden bust of Maxentius]]
[[Image:Maxentius02 pushkin.jpg|left|thumb|upright|Dresden bust of Maxentius]]
While Maxentius built up Rome's defenses, Maximian made his way to Gaul to confer with Constantine. Maximian offered to wed his younger daughter [[Fausta]] to Constantine, and to elevate him to Augustan rank in Maxentius' secessionist regime. In return, Constantine would reaffirm the old family alliance between Maximian and Constantius, and offer support to Maxentius' cause in Italy. Constantine accepted. In a double ceremony in Trier in the late summer of 307, Constantine married Fausta and was declared Augustus by Maximian. Constantine now gave Maxentius political recognition, but remained neutral in Galerius' war against Maxentius.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 31; Lenski, 64; Odahl, 87&ndash;88; Pohlsander, ''Emperor Constantine'', 15&ndash;16.</ref>
While Maxentius built up Rome's defenses, Maximian made his way to Gaul to negotiate with Constantine. A deal was struck in which Contantine would marry Maximian's younger daughter [[Fausta]] and be elevated to Augustan rank in Maxentius' secessionist regime. In return, Constantine would reaffirm the old family alliance between Maximian and Constantius, and support Maxentius' cause in Italy but would remain neutral in the war with Galerius. The deal was sealed with a double ceremony in Trier in the late summer of 307, at which Constantine married Fausta and was declared Augustus by Maximian.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 31; Lenski, 64; Odahl, 87&ndash;88; Pohlsander, ''Emperor Constantine'', 15&ndash;16.</ref><!-- Recasting may might require redistribution of refs.-->


Maximian returned to Rome in the winter of 307&ndash;8. He soon fell out with his son, and challenged his right to rule in the spring of 308 before an assembly of Roman soldiers. He spoke of Rome's sickly government, disparaged Maxentius for having weakened it, ripped the imperial toga from Maxentius' shoulders, and waited for the soldiers to recognize him. The soldiers sided with Maxentius, and Maximian was forced to leave Italy in disgrace.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 32; Lenski, 64; Odahl, 89, 93.</ref> On [[November 11]] [[308]], Galerius called a general council at the military city of [[Carnuntum]] on the upper Danube to resolve the instability in the western provinces. In attendance were Diocletian, briefly returned from retirement, Galerius and Maximian. Maximian was forced to abdicate again and Constantine was again demoted to Caesar. [[Licinius]], a loyal military companion to Galerius, was appointed Augustus of the West.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 32&ndash;34; Elliott, 42&ndash;43; Lenski, 65; Odahl, 90&ndash;91; Pohlsander, ''Emperor Constantine'', 17; Potter, 349&ndash;50; Treadgold, 29.</ref> In early 309 Maximian returned to the court of Constantine in Gaul, the only court that would still accept him.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 32.</ref>
Maximian returned to Rome in the winter of 307&ndash;8 but soon fell out with his son and in the spring of 308 challenged his right to rule before an assembly of Roman soldiers. He spoke of Rome's sickly government, disparaged Maxentius for having weakened it, and ripped the imperial toga from Maxentius' shoulders. He expected the soldiers to recognize him but they sided with Maxentius, and Maximian was forced to leave Italy in disgrace.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 32; Lenski, 64; Odahl, 89, 93.</ref>
On [[November 11]] [[308]], to resolve the political instability, Galerius called Diocletian (out of retirement) and Maximian to a general council meeting at the military city of [[Carnuntum]] on the upper Danube. There, Maximian was forced again to abdicate again and Constantine was again demoted to Caesar. [[Licinius]], a loyal military companion to Galerius, was appointed Augustus of the West.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 32&ndash;34; Elliott, 42&ndash;43; Lenski, 65; Odahl, 90&ndash;91; Pohlsander, ''Emperor Constantine'', 17; Potter, 349&ndash;50; Treadgold, 29.</ref> In early 309 Maximian returned to the court of Constantine in Gaul, the only court that would still accept him.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 32.</ref>


==Rebellion against Constantine==
==Rebellion against Constantine==
In 310, Maximian rebelled against Constantine while Constantine was on campaign against the Franks. Maximian had been sent south to Arles with a contingent of Constantine's army, in preparation for any attacks by Maxentius in southern Gaul. In Arles, Maximian announced that Constantine was dead, and took up the [[Tyrian purple|imperial purple]]. In spite of a large donative pledge to any who would support him as emperor, most of Constantine's army remained loyal, and Maximian was compelled to leave. Constantine soon heard of the rebellion, abandoned his campaign against the Franks, and marched his army up the Rhine. He moved quickly to southern Gaul, where he approached the fleeing Maximian at Massilia ([[Marseille]]). Massilia was more capable of withstanding a long siege than Arles, but it made little difference: the loyal citizens of Massilia opened the rear gates of the city to Constantine. Maximian was captured, reproved for his crimes, and stripped of his title for the third and last time. Constantine granted Maximian some initial clemency, but his suicide was strongly encouraged. Maximian hanged himself in July 310.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 34&ndash;35; Elliott, 43; Lenski, 65&ndash;66; Odahl, 93; Pohlsander, ''Emperor Constantine'', 17; Potter, 352.</ref>
In 310, Maximian rebelled against Constantine while the emperor was on campaign against the Franks. Maximian had been sent south to Arles with part of Constantine's army to defend against attacks by Maxentius in southern Gaul. In Arles, Maximian announced that Constantine was dead and took up the [[Tyrian purple|imperial purple]]. In spite offering bribes to any who would support him as emperor, most of Constantine's army remained loyal, and Maximian was compelled to leave. Constantine soon heard of the rebellion, abandoned his campaign against the Franks, and moved quickly to southern Gaul, where he confronted the fleeing Maximian at Massilia ([[Marseille]]). The town was better able to withstand a long siege than Arles, but it made little difference as loyal citizens opened the rear gates to Constantine. Maximian was captured, reproved for his crimes, and stripped of his title for the third and last time. Constantine granted Maximian some clemency but strongly encouraged his suicide. In July 310, Maximian hanged himself.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 34&ndash;35; Elliott, 43; Lenski, 65&ndash;66; Odahl, 93; Pohlsander, ''Emperor Constantine'', 17; Potter, 352.</ref>

Despite the earlier rupture in relations, after Maximian's suicide Maxentius presented himself as his father's devoted son.<ref>Elliott, 43; Lenski, 68; Pohlsander, ''Emperor Constantine'', 20.</ref> He minted coins bearing his father's deified image and proclaimed his desire to avenge his death.<ref>Barnes, ''New Empire'', 34; Elliott, 45; Lenski, 68.</ref>


In spite of the rupture in their relations, Maxentius presented himself as his father's devoted son after his suicide.<ref>Elliott, 43; Lenski, 68; Pohlsander, ''Emperor Constantine'', 20.</ref> He began minting coins bearing his father's deified image and proclaiming his desire to avenge Maximian's death.<ref>Barnes, ''New Empire'', 34; Elliott, 45; Lenski, 68.</ref> Constantine initially presented Maximian's death as an unfortunate family tragedy. By 311, however, Constantine was spreading another narrative: After Constantine pardoned him, Maximian had planned to murder Constantine in his sleep. Fausta learned of the plot and warned Constantine who put a [[eunuch]] in his own place in bed. Maximian was apprehended when he killed the eunuch, and was offered the chance to hang himself, which he accepted.<ref>Lactantius, ''DMP'' 30.1; Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 40&ndash;41, 305.</ref> In addition to the propaganda, Constantine instituted a ''[[damnatio memoriae]]'' on Maximian, destroying all inscriptions referring to him and eliminating any public work bearing his image.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 41; Lenski, 68.</ref>
Constantine initially presented the suicide as an unfortunate family tragedy. By 311, however, he was spreading another version. According to this, after Constantine had pardoned him, Maximian planned to murder Constantine in his sleep. Fausta learned of the plot and warned Constantine, who put a [[eunuch]] in his own place in bed. Maximian was apprehended when he killed the eunuch and was offered suicide, which he accepted.<ref>Lactantius, ''DMP'' 30.1; Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 40&ndash;41, 305.</ref> In addition to the propaganda, Constantine instituted a ''[[damnatio memoriae]]'' on Maximian, destroying all inscriptions referring to him and eliminating any public work bearing his image.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 41; Lenski, 68.</ref>


Constantine defeated Maxentius at the [[Battle of the Milvian Bridge]] on [[October 28]] [[312]]. Maxentius died, and Italy came under Constantine's rule.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 42&ndash;44.</ref> Eutropia swore on oath that Maxentius was not Maximian's son, and Maximian's memory was rehabilitated. He was consecrated as a god again, probably in 317, because his [[apotheosis]] under Maxentius had been rendered null and void. He began appearing on Constantine's coinage as ''divus'', or divine, by 318, together with the deified Constantius and [[Claudius II|Claudius Gothicus]].<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 47; Barnes, ''New Empire'', 35.</ref> The three were hailed as Constantine's forbears. They were called "the best of emperors".<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 47.</ref> Through his daughters Fausta and Flavia, Maximian was grandfather or great-grandfather to every reigning emperor from 337 to 363.<ref>Barnes, ''New Empire'', 265&ndash;66.</ref>
Constantine defeated Maxentius at the [[Battle of the Milvian Bridge]] on [[October 28]] [[312]]. Maxentius died, and Italy came under Constantine's rule.<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 42&ndash;44.</ref> Eutropia swore on oath that Maxentius was not Maximian's son, and Maximian's memory was rehabilitated. His [[apotheosis]] under Maxentius was declared null and void, and he was re-consecrated as a god, probably in 317. He began appearing on Constantine's coinage as ''divus'', or divine, by 318, together with the deified Constantius and [[Claudius II|Claudius Gothicus]].<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 47; Barnes, ''New Empire'', 35.</ref> The three were hailed as Constantine's forbears. They were called "the best of emperors".<ref>Barnes, ''Constantine and Eusebius'', 47.</ref> Through his daughters Fausta and Flavia, Maximian was grandfather or great-grandfather to every reigning emperor from 337 to 363.<ref>Barnes, ''New Empire'', 265&ndash;66.</ref>


==See also==
==See also==
Line 135: Line 150:
* Corcoran, Simon. ''The Empire of the Tetrarchs: Imperial Pronouncements and Government, AD 284&ndash;324''. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996. ISBN 019815304X
* Corcoran, Simon. ''The Empire of the Tetrarchs: Imperial Pronouncements and Government, AD 284&ndash;324''. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996. ISBN 019815304X
* Corcoran, Simon. "Before Constantine." In ''The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Constantine'', edited by Noel Lenski, 35&ndash;58. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Hardcover ISBN 0-521-81838-9 Paperback ISBN 0-521-52157-2
* Corcoran, Simon. "Before Constantine." In ''The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Constantine'', edited by Noel Lenski, 35&ndash;58. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Hardcover ISBN 0-521-81838-9 Paperback ISBN 0-521-52157-2
* DiMaio, Jr., Michael. "[http://www.roman-emperors.org/chlorus.htm Constantius I Chlorus (305&ndash;306 A.D.)]." ''De Imperatoribus Romanis'' (1996a). Accessed March 8, 2008.
* DiMaio, Jr., Michael. "[http://www.roman-emperors.org/chlorus.htm Constantius I Chlorus (305&ndash;306 A.D.)]." ''De Imperatoribus Romanis'' (1996a). Accessed [[March 8]], [[2008]].
* DiMaio, Jr., Michael. "[http://www.roman-emperors.org/galerius.htm Galerius (305&ndash;311 A.D.)]." ''De Imperatoribus Romanis'' (1996b). Accessed March 8, 2008.
* DiMaio, Jr., Michael. "[http://www.roman-emperors.org/galerius.htm Galerius (305&ndash;311 A.D.)]." ''De Imperatoribus Romanis'' (1996b). Accessed [[March 8]], [[2008]].
* DiMaio, Jr., Michael. "[http://www.roman-emperors.org/maxherc.htm Maximianus Herculius (286&ndash;305 A.D)]." ''De Imperatoribus Romanis'' (1997a). Accessed March 8, 2008.
* DiMaio, Jr., Michael. "[http://www.roman-emperors.org/maxherc.htm Maximianus Herculius (286&ndash;305 A.D)]." ''De Imperatoribus Romanis'' (1997a). Accessed [[March 8]], [[2008]].
* DiMaio, Jr., Michael. "[http://www.roman-emperors.org/maxentiu.htm Maxentius (306&ndash;312 A.D.)]." ''De Imperatoribus Romanis'' (1997b). Accessed April 5, 2008.
* DiMaio, Jr., Michael. "[http://www.roman-emperors.org/maxentiu.htm Maxentius (306&ndash;312 A.D.)]." ''De Imperatoribus Romanis'' (1997b). Accessed [[April 5]], [[2008]].
* Elliott, T. G. ''The Christianity of Constantine the Great''. Scranton, PA: University of Scranton Press, 1996. ISBN 0-940866-59-5
* Elliott, T. G. ''The Christianity of Constantine the Great''. Scranton, PA: University of Scranton Press, 1996. ISBN 0-940866-59-5
* Lenski, Noel. "The Reign of Constantine." In ''The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Constantine'', edited by Noel Lenski, 59&ndash;90. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Hardcover ISBN 0-521-81838-9 Paperback ISBN 0-521-52157-2
* Lenski, Noel. "The Reign of Constantine." In ''The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Constantine'', edited by Noel Lenski, 59&ndash;90. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Hardcover ISBN 0-521-81838-9 Paperback ISBN 0-521-52157-2
* Liebeschuetz, J. H. W. G. ''Continuity and Change in Roman Religion''. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979. ISBN 0-19-814822-4.
* Liebeschuetz, J. H. W. G. ''Continuity and Change in Roman Religion''. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979. ISBN 0-19-814822-4.
* Mackay, Christopher S. "Lactantius and the Succession to Diocletian." ''Classical Philology'' 94:2 (1999): 198&ndash;209.
* Mackay, Christopher S. "Lactantius and the Succession to Diocletian." ''Classical Philology'' 94:2 (1999): 198&ndash;209.
* Mathisen, Ralph W. "[http://www.roman-emperors.org/dioclet.htm Diocletian (284&ndash;305 A.D.)]." ''De Imperatoribus Romanis'' (1997). Accessed February 16, 2008.
* Mathisen, Ralph W. "[http://www.roman-emperors.org/dioclet.htm Diocletian (284&ndash;305 A.D.)]." ''De Imperatoribus Romanis'' (1997). Accessed [[February 16]], [[2008]].
* Odahl, Charles Matson. ''Constantine and the Christian Empire''. New York: Routledge, 2004. Hardcover ISBN 0-415-17485-6 Paperback ISBN 0-415-38655-1
* Odahl, Charles Matson. ''Constantine and the Christian Empire''. New York: Routledge, 2004. Hardcover ISBN 0-415-17485-6 Paperback ISBN 0-415-38655-1
* Pohlsander, Hans. ''The Emperor Constantine''. London & New York: Routledge, 2004a. Hardcover ISBN 0-415-31937-4 Paperback ISBN 0-415-31938-2
* Pohlsander, Hans. ''The Emperor Constantine''. London & New York: Routledge, 2004a. Hardcover ISBN 0-415-31937-4 Paperback ISBN 0-415-31938-2
* Pohlsander, Hans. "[http://www.roman-emperors.org/conniei.htm Constantine I (306 - 337 A.D.)]." ''De Imperatoribus Romanis'' (2004b). Accessed December 16, 2007.
* Pohlsander, Hans. "[http://www.roman-emperors.org/conniei.htm Constantine I (306 - 337 A.D.)]." ''De Imperatoribus Romanis'' (2004b). Accessed [[December 16]], [[2007]].
* Potter, David S. ''The Roman Empire at Bay: AD 180&ndash;395''. New York: Routledge, 2005. Hardcover ISBN 0-415-10057-7 Paperback ISBN 0-415-10058-5
* Potter, David S. ''The Roman Empire at Bay: AD 180&ndash;395''. New York: Routledge, 2005. Hardcover ISBN 0-415-10057-7 Paperback ISBN 0-415-10058-5
* Rees, Roger. ''Layers of Loyalty in Latin Panegyric: AD 289&ndash;307''. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002. ISBN 0-19-924918-0
* Rees, Roger. ''Layers of Loyalty in Latin Panegyric: AD 289&ndash;307''. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002. ISBN 0-19-924918-0
Line 232: Line 247:
[[da:Maximian Herculius]]
[[da:Maximian Herculius]]
[[de:Maximian]]
[[de:Maximian]]
[[et:Maximianus]]
[[es:Maximiano]]
[[es:Maximiano]]
[[et:Maximianus]]
[[eu:Maximiano]]
[[eu:Maximiano]]
[[fi:Maximianus]]
[[fr:Maximien Hercule]]
[[fr:Maximien Hercule]]
[[fy:Maksimianus]]
[[fy:Maksimianus]]
[[gl:Maximiano]]
[[gl:Maximiano]]
[[ko:막시미아누스]]
[[hr:Maksimijan]]
[[hr:Maksimijan]]
[[hu:Maximianus]]
[[ia:Maximiano]]
[[ia:Maximiano]]
[[is:Maximianus]]
[[it:Massimiano]]
[[it:Massimiano]]
[[ja:マクシミアヌス]]
[[sw:Kaizari Maximian]]
[[ko:막시미아누스]]
[[la:Maximianus]]
[[la:Maximianus]]
[[hu:Maximianus]]
[[nl:Maximianus]]
[[nl:Maximianus]]
[[ja:マクシミアヌス]]
[[no:Maximian]]
[[no:Maximian]]
[[pl:Maksymian]]
[[pl:Maksymian]]
Line 253: Line 269:
[[ru:Максимиан]]
[[ru:Максимиан]]
[[sr:Максимијан]]
[[sr:Максимијан]]
[[fi:Maximianus]]
[[sv:Maximianus]]
[[sv:Maximianus]]
[[sw:Kaizari Maximian]]
[[tr:Maximian]]
[[tr:Maximian]]

Revision as of 21:39, 9 April 2008

Maximian
Caesar then Augustus of the West
File:Maximian.gif
Coin featuring Maximian
ReignJuly 21[1] or July 25[2] 285 – 286 (as Caesar under Diocletian)
March 1 286[3] – May 1 305 (as Augustus of the West, with Diocletian as Augustus of the East)[4]
Late 306 – November 11 308 (declared himself Augustus)[5]
310 (declared himself Augustus)[6]
PredecessorNumerian
SuccessorConstantius Chlorus and Galerius
SpouseEutropia
IssueFlavia Maximiana Theodora
Maxentius
Fausta
Names
Marcus Aurelius Valerius Maximianus Herculius[7]

Marcus Aurelius Valerius Maximianus Herculius (ca. 250 – ca. July 310[8]), commonly referred to as Maximian, was Caesar (junior Roman Emperor) from July 285[1][2] and Augustus (senior Roman Emperor) from April 1 286[3] to May 1 305.[4] He shared the latter title with his co-emperor and superior, Diocletian, whose political brain complemented Maximian's military brawn. Maximian established his residence at Trier but spent most of his time on campaign. In the late summer of 285, he suppressed rebels in Gaul known as the Bagaudae. From 285 to 288, he fought against Germanic tribes along the Rhine frontier. Together with Diocletian, he ran a scorched earth campaign deep into the territory of the Alamanni tribes in 288, temporarily relieving the Rhenish provinces from the threat of Germanic invasion.

The man he appointed to police the Channel shores, Carausius, rebelled in 286, causing the secession of Britain and northwestern Gaul. Maximian failed to oust Carausius, and his invasion fleet was destroyed by storms in 289 or 290. Maximan's subordinate, Constantius, campaigned against Carausius' successor, Allectus, while Maximian held the Rhenish frontier. The rebel leader was ousted in 296, and Maximian moved south to combat Moorish pirates in Iberia and Berber incursions in Mauretania. When these campaigns concluded in 298, he departed for Italy, where he lived in comfort until 305. At Diocletian's behest, Maximian abdicated on May 1 305, gave the Augustan office to Constantius, and retired to southern Italy.

In late 306, Maximian took the title of Augustus again and aided his son Maxentius' rebellion in Italy. In April 307, he attempted to depose his son, but failed and fled to the court of Constantius' successor, Constantine, in Trier. At the Council of Carnuntum in November 308, Diocletian and his successor, Galerius, forced Maximian to renounce his imperial claim again. In early 310, Maximian attempted to seize Constantine's title while the emperor was on campaign on the Rhine. Few supported him, and he was captured by Constantine in Marseille. Maximian committed suicide in the summer of 310 on Constantine's orders. During Constantine's war with Maxentius, Maximian's image was purged from all public places. However, after Constantine ousted and killed Maxentius, Maximian's image was rehabilitated, and he was deified.

Early life

Maximian was born near Sirmium (Sremska Mitrovica, Serbia) in the province of Pannonia, around 250 into a family of shopkeepers.[9] Beyond that, the ancient sources contain vague allusions to Illyricum as his homeland,[10] to his Pannonian virtues,[11] and to his harsh upbringing along the war-torn Danube frontier.[12] Maximian joined the army, serving with Diocletian under the emperors Aurelian (r. 270–275) and Probus (r. 276–282). He probably participated in the Mesopotamian campaign of Carus in 283 and attended Diocletian's election as emperor on November 20 284 at Nicomedia.[13] Maximian's swift appointment by Diocletian as Caesar is taken by the writer Stephen Williams and historian Timothy Barnes to mean that the two men were longterm allies, that their respective roles were pre-agreed and that Maximian had probably supported Diocletian during his campaign against Carinus (r. 283–285) but there is no direct evidence for this.[14]

With his great energy, firm aggressive character and disinclination to rebel, Maximian was an appealing candidate for imperial office. The fourth-century historian Aurelius Victor described Maximian as "a colleague trustworthy in friendship, if somewhat boorish, and of great military talents".[15] Despite his other qualities, Maximian was uneducated and preferred action to thought. The panegyrist of 289, after comparing his actions to Scipio Africanus' victories over Hannibal during the Second Punic War, suggested that Maximian has never heard of them.[16] His ambitions were purely military; he left politics to Diocletian.[17] The Christian rhetor Lactantius suggested that Maximian shared Diocletian's basic attitudes but was less puritanical in his tastes, and took advantage of the sensual opportunities his position as emperor offered.[18] Lactantius charged that Maximian defiled senator's daughters and traveled with young virgins to satisfy his unending lust, though Lactantius' credibility is undermined by his hostility towards pagans.[19]

Maximian had two children with his Syrian wife, Eutropia: Maxentius and Fausta. There is no direct evidence in the ancient sources for their birthdates. Modern estimates of Maxentius' birth year have varied from circa 277 to circa 287, and most date Fausta's birth to circa 298.[20] Theodora, the wife of Constantius Chlorus, is often called Maximian's stepdaughter by ancient sources, leading to claims by Otto Seeck and Ernest Stein that she was born from an earlier marriage between Eutropia and Afranius Hannibalianus.[21] Barnes challenges this view, saying that all "stepdaughter" sources derive their information from the partially unreliable work of history Kaisergeschichte, while other, more reliable sources, refer to her as Maximian's natural daughter.[22] Barnes concludes that Theodora was born no later than circa 275 to an unnamed earlier wife of Maximian, possibly one of Hannibalianus' daughters.[23]

Appointment as Caesar

Diocletian, Maximian's senior colleague and Augustus of the East

At Mediolanum (Milan, Italy) in July 285,[24] Diocletian proclaimed Maximian as his co-ruler, or Caesar.[25] The reasons for this decision are complex. With conflict in every province of the empire, from Gaul to Syria, from Egypt to the lower Danube, Diocletian needed a lieutenant to manage his heavy workload.[26] Historian Stephen Williams suggests that Diocletian considered himself a mediocre general and needed a man like Maximian to do most of his fighting.[27]

Next, Diocletian was vulnerable in that he had no sons – just a daughter, Valeria – who could never succeed him. He was forced therefore to seek a co-ruler from outside his family and that co-ruler had to be someone he trusted.[28] (The historian William Seston has argued that Diocletian, like heirless emperors before him, adopted Maximian as his filius Augusti ("Augustan son") upon his appointment to the office. Some agree, but the historian Frank Kolb has stated that arguments for the adoption are based on misreadings of the papyrological evidence.[29])

Finally, Diocletian knew that single rule was dangerous and that precedent existed for dual rulership. Despite their military prowess, both sole-emperors Aurelian and Probus had been easily removed from power.[30] In contrast, just a few years earlier, the emperor Carus and his sons had ruled jointly, albeit not for long. Even the first emperor, Augustus, (r. 27 BC–AD 19), had shared power with his colleagues and more formal offices of co-emperor had existed from Marcus Aurelius (r. 161–180) on.[31]

The dual system evidently worked well. About 287, the two rulers' relationship was re-defined in religious terms, with Diocletian assuming the title Iovius and Maximian Herculius.[32] The titles were pregnant with symbolism: Diocletian-Jove had the dominant role of planning and commanding; Maximian-Hercules the heroic role of completing assigned tasks.[33] Yet despite the symbolism, the emperors were "gods" in the Imperial cult tradition (although they may have been hailed as such in Imperial panegyrics). Instead, they were the gods' instruments, imposing the gods' will on earth.[34] Once the rituals were over, Maximian assumed control of the government of the West and dispatched to Gaul to fight the rebels known as Bagaudae while Diocletian returned to the East.[35]

Early campaigns in Gaul and Germany

The Bagaudae of Gaul are obscure figures, appearing fleetingly in the ancient sources, with their 285 uprising being their first appearance.[36] The fourth-century historian Eutropius described them as rural people under the leadership of Amandus and Aelianus, while Aurelius Victor called them bandits.[37] The historian David S. Potter suggests that they were more than peasants, seeking either Gallic political autonomy or reinstatement of the recently deposed Carus (a native of Gallia Narbonensis, in what would become southern France): in this case, they would be defecting imperial troops, not brigands.[38] Although poorly equipped, led and trained – and therefore a poor match for Roman legions – Diocletian certainly considered the Bagaudae sufficient threat to merit an emperor to counter them.[39]

Maximian traveled to Gaul, engaging the Bagaudae late in the summer of 285.[40] Details of the campaign are sparse and provide no tactical detail: the historical sources dwell only on Maximian's virtues and victories. The 289 panegyric to Maximian records that the rebels were defeated with a blend of harshness and leniency.[41] As the campaign was against the empire's own citizens, and therefore distasteful, it went unrecorded in titles and official triumphs. Indeed, Maximian's panegyrist declares: "I pass quickly over this episode, for I see in your magnanimity you would rather forget this victory than celebrate it."[42] By the end of the year, the revolt had significantly abated, and Maximian moved the bulk of his forces to the Rhine frontier, heralding a period of stability.[43]

Maximian did not put down the Bagaudae swiftly enough to avoid a Germanic reaction. In the autumn of 285, two barbarian armies – one of Burgundians and Alamanni, the other of Chaibones and Heruli – forded the Rhine and entered Gaul.[44] The first army was left to die of disease and hunger, while Maximian intercepted and defeated the second.[45] He then established a Rhine headquarters in preparation for future campaigns,[46] either at Moguntiacum (Mainz, Germany), Augusta Treverorum (Trier, Germany), or Colonia Agrippina (Cologne, Germany).[47]

Carausius

A Roman antefix roof tile showing the badge and standard of Legio XX Valeria Victrix, one of the legions that joined Carausius' rebellion

Although most of Gaul was pacified, regions bordering the English Channel still suffered from Frankish and Saxon piracy. The emperors Probus and Carinus had begun to fortify the Saxon Shore, but much remained to be done.[48] For example, there is no archaeological evidence of naval bases at Dover and Boulogne during 270–285.[49] In response to the pirate problem, Maximian appointed Mausaeus Carausius, a Menapian from Germania Inferior (southern and western Netherlands) to command the Channel and to clear it of raiders.[50] Carausius did well and, by the end of 285, was capturing pirate ships in great numbers.[51]

Maximian soon heard that Carausius was waiting until the pirates had finished plundering before attacking and that their booty was going into Carausius' pockets instead of to the population at large or into the imperial treasury.[52] Maximian ordered Carausius' arrest and execution, prompting him to flee the continent to Britain. Carausius' support among the British was strong, and at least two British legions (II Augusta and XX Valeria Victrix) defected to him, as did some or all of a legion near Boulogne (probably XXX Ulpia Victrix).[53] Carausius quickly eliminated the few remaining loyalists in his army and declared himself Augustus.[54]

Maximian could do little about the revolt. He had no fleet – he had given it to Casausius – and was busy quelling the Heruli and the Franks. Meanwhile, Carausius strengthened his position by enlarging his fleet, enlisting Frankish mercenaries, and paying his troops well.[54] By the autumn of 286, Britain, much of northwestern Gaul, and the entire Channel coast, was under his control.[55] Casausius declared himself head of an independent British state, an Imperium Britanniarum and issued coin of a markedly higher purity than that of Maximian and Diocletian, earning the support of British and Gallic merchants.[56] Even Maximian's troops were vulnerable to Carausius' influence and wealth.[57]

Maximian appointed Augustus

Spurred by the crisis with Carausius, on April 1 286,[3] Maximian took the title of Augustus[58] This gave him the same status as Carausius – so the clash was between two Augusti, rather than between an Augustus and a Caesar – and, in imperial propaganda, Maximian was proclaimed Diocletian's brother, his equal in authority and prestige.[59] Diocletian could not have been present at Maximian's appointment,[60] causing Seeck to suggest that Maximian usurped the title and was only later recognized by Diocletian in hopes of avoiding civil war. This suggestion has not won much support, and the historian William Leadbetter has recently refuted it.[61] Despite the physical distance between the emperors, Diocletian trusted Maximian enough to invest him with imperial powers, and Maximian still respected Diocletian enough to act in accordance with his will.[62]

In theory, the Roman Empire was not divided by the dual imperium. Though divisions did take place – each emperor had his own court, army, and official residences – these were matters of practicality, not substance. Imperial propaganda from 287 on insists on a singular and indivisible Rome, a patrimonium indivisum.[63] As the panegyrist of 289 declares to Maximian: "So it is that this great empire is a communal possession for both of you, without any discord, nor would we endure there to be any dispute between you, but plainly you hold the state in equal measure as once those two Heracleidae, the Spartan Kings, had done."[64] Legal rulings were given and imperial celebrations took place in both emperors' names; the same coins were issued in both parts of the empire.[65] Diocletian sometimes issued commands to Maximian's province of Africa; Maximian could presumably do the same for Diocletian's territory.[66]

Campaigns against Rhenish tribes

Campaigns in 286 and 287

Maximian realized that he could not immediately suppress Carausius and campaigned instead against Rhenish tribes.[67] These tribes were probably greater threats to Gallic peace than Carausius in any case and included many supporters of Carausius.[68] Although Maximian had many enemies along the river, they were more often in dispute with each other than in combat with the empire.[69] Few clear dates survive for Maximian's campaigns on the Rhine beyond a general range of 285 to 288.[70] While receiving the consular fasces on January 1 287, Maximian was interrupted by news of a barbarian raid. Doffing his toga and donning his armor, he marched against the barbarians and, although they were not entirely dispersed, he celebrated a victory in Gaul later that year.[71]

Maximian believed the Burgundian and Alemanni tribes of the Moselle-Vosges region to be the greatest threat, so he targeted them first. He campaigned using scorched earth tactics, laying waste to their land and reducing their numbers through famine and disease. After the Burgundians and Alemanni, Maximian moved against the weaker Heruli and Chaibones. He cornered and defeated them in a single battle. He fought in person, riding along the battle line until the Germanic forces broke. Roman forces pursued the fleeing tribal armies and routed them. With his enemies from starvation,[69] Maximian launched a great invasion across the Rhine.[72] He moved deep into Germanic territory, bringing destruction to his enemies' homelands,[69] and demonstrating the superiority of Roman arms.[71] By the winter of 287, he had the advantage and the Rhenish lands were free of Germanic tribesmen.[69]

Flavius Constantius, Maximian's praetorian prefect and husband to his daughter Theodora.

Joint campaign against the Alamanni

The following spring, as Maximian made preparations for dealing with Carausius, Diocletian returned from the East.[73] The emperors met that year, but neither date nor place is known with certainty.[74] They probably agreed on a joint campaign against the Alamanni and a naval expedition against Carausius.[75]

Later in the year, Maximian led a surprise invasion of the Agri Decumates – a region between the upper Rhine and upper Danube deep within Alamanni territory – while Diocletian invaded Germany via Raetia. Both emperors burned crops and food supplies as they went, destroying the Germans' means of sustenance.[76] They added large swathes of territory to the empire and allowed Maximian's build-up to proceed without further disturbance.[77] In the aftermath of the war, towns along the Rhine were rebuilt, bridgeheads created on the eastern banks at such places as Mainz and Cologne, and a military frontier was established, comprising forts, roads, and fortified towns. A military highway through Tornacum (Tournai, Belgium), Bavacum (Bavay, France), Atuatuca Tungrorum (Tongeren, Belgium), Mosae Trajectum (Maastricht, Netherlands), and Cologne connected points along the frontier.[78]

Constantius, Gennobaudes, and resettlement

In early 288, Maximian appointed his praetorian prefect Flavius Constantius, husband of Maximian's daughter Theodora, to lead a campaign against Carausius' Frankish allies. These Franks controlled the Rhine estuaries, thwarting sea-attacks against Carausius. Constantius moved north through their territory, wreaking havoc, and reaching the North Sea. The Franks sued for peace and in the subsequent settlement Maximian reinstated the deposed Frankish king Gennobaudes.[71] Gennobaudes became Maximian's vassal and, with lesser Frankish chiefs in turn swearing loyalty to Gennobaudes, Roman regional dominance was assured.[79]

Maximian allowed a settlement of Frisians, Salian Franks, Chamavi and other tribes along a strip of Roman territory, either between the Rhine and Waal rivers from Noviomagus (Nijmegen, Netherlands) to Traiectum (Utrecht, Netherlands)[78] or near Trier.[71] These tribes were allowed to settle only on condition they acknowledged Roman dominance. Their presence, providing a ready pool of manpower and preventing the settlement of other Frankish tribes, gave Maximian a buffer along the northern Rhine and reduced his need to garrison the region.[78]

Later campaigns in Britain and Gaul

Failed expedition against Carausius

Carausius, rebel emperor of Roman Britain

By 289, Maximian was prepared to invade Carausius' Britain but, for some reason, the plan failed. Maximian's panegyrist of 289 was optimistic about the campaign's prospects; but the panegyrist of 291 made no mention of it.[80] Constantius' panegyrist suggested that his fleet was lost to a storm,[81] but this might simply have been to diminish the embarrassment of defeat.[82] Diocletian curtailed his Eastern province tour soon after, perhaps on learning of Maximian's failure.[83] Diocletian returned in haste to the West, reaching Emesa by May 10 290,[84] and Sirmium on the Danube by July 1 290.[85]

Diocletian met Maximian in Milan either in late December 290 or January 291.[86] Crowds gathered to witness the emperors descend on the city and the emperors devoted much time to public pageantry.[87] Potter, among others, has surmised that the ceremonies were arranged to demonstrate Diocletian's continuing support for his faltering colleague. The rulers discussed matters of politics and war in secret,[88] and they may have considered the idea of expanding the imperial college to include four emperors (the Tetrarchy).[89] Meanwhile, a deputation from the Roman Senate met with the rulers and renewed their infrequent contact with the imperial office.[90] The emperors would not meet again until 303.[91]

Following Maximian's failure to invade in 289, an uneasy truce with Carausius began. Maximian tolerated Carausius' rule in Britain and on the continent but refused to grant the secessionist state formal legitimacy. For his part, Carausius was content with his territories beyond the Continental coast of Gaul.[92] However, Diocletian would not long put up with such an affront to his dignity. Faced with Carausius' secession and further challenges on the Egyptian, Syrian, and Danubian borders, he realized that two emperors were insufficient to manage the empire.[93] On March 1 293 at Milan, Maximian appointed Constantius to the office of Caesar.[94] On either the same day or a month later, Diocletian did the same for Galerius, thus establishing the "Tetrarchy", or "rule of four".[95] Constantius was made to understand that he must succeed where Maximian had failed and defeat Carausius.[96]

Campaign against Allectus

Allectus, Carausius' successor

Constantius met expectations quickly and efficiently, and by 293 had expelled Carausian forces from northern Gaul. In the same year, Casausius was assassinated and replaced by his treasurer, Allectus.[97] Constantius marched up the coast to the Rhine and Scheldt estuaries where he was victorious over Carausius' Frankish allies, taking the title Germanicus maximus.[98] His sights now set on Britain, Constantius spent the following years building an invasion fleet.[99] Maximian, still in Italy after the appointment of Constantius, was appraised of the invasion plans and, in the summer of 296, returned to Gaul.[100] There, he held the Rhenish frontiers against Carausius' Frankish allies while Constantius launched his invasion of Britain.[101] Allectus was killed on the North Downs in battle with Constantius' praetorian prefect, Asclepiodotus. Constantius himself had landed near Dubris (Dover) and marched on Londinium (London), whose citizens greeted him as a liberator.[102]

Campaigns in North Africa

With Constantius' victorious return, Maximian was able to focus on the conflict in Mauretania (Northwest Africa).[103] As Roman authority weakened during the third century, nomadic Berber tribes harassed settlements in the region with increasingly severe consequences. In 289, the governor of Mauretania Caesariensis (roughly modern Algeria) gained a temporary respite by pitting a small army against the Bavares and Quinquegentiani, but the raiders soon returned. In 296, Maximian raised an army, from Praetorian cohorts, Aquileian, Egyptian, and Danubian legionaries, Gallic and German auxiliaries, and Thracian recruits, advancing through Spain that autumn.[104][105] He may have defended the region against raiding Moors[106] before crossing the Strait of Gibraltar into Mauretania Tingitana (roughly modern Morocco) to protect the area from Frankish pirates.[104]

By March 297, Maximian had begun a bloody offensive against the Berbers. The campaign was lengthy, and Maximian spent the winter of 297–298 resting in Carthage before returning to the field.[107] Not content to drive them back into their homelands in the Atlas Mountains – from which they could continue to wage war – Maximian ventured deep into Berber territory. The terrain was unfavorable, and the Berbers were skilled at guerrilla warfare, but Maximian pressed on. Apparently wishing to inflict as much punishment as possible on the tribes, he devastated previously secure land, killed as many as he could, and drove the remainder back into the Sahara.[104] His campaign was concluded by the spring of 298 and, on March 10, he made a triumphal entry into Carthage.[108] Inscriptions there record the people's gratitude to Maximian, hailing him – as Constantius had been on his entry to London – as redditor lucis aeternae ("restorer of the eternal light").[104] Maximian returned to Italy in 299 to celebrate another triumph in Rome.[109]

Leisure and retirement

After his Mauretanian campaign, Maximian returned to the north of Italy, living a life of leisure in palaces in Milan and Aquilea, and leaving warfare to his subordinate Constantius.[110] Maximian was more aggressive in his relationship with the Senate than Constantius, and Lactantius contends that he terrorized senators, to the point of falsely charging and subsequently executing several, including the prefect of Rome in 301/2.[111] In contrast, Constantius kept up good relations with the senatorial aristocracy and spent his time in active defense of the empire. He took up arms against the Franks in 300 or 301 and in 302 – while Maximian was resting in Italy – continued to campaign against Germanic tribes on the Upper Rhine.[112]

Maximian was only disturbed from his rest in 303 by Diocletian's vicennalia, the 20-year anniversary of his reign, in Rome. Some evidence suggests that it was on then that Diocletian exacted a promise from Maximian to retire together, passing their titles as Augusti to the Caesars Constantius and Galerius.[113] Presumably Maximian's son Maxentius and Constantius' son Constantine – children raised in Nicomedia together – would then become the new Caesars. While Maximian might not have wished to retire, Diocletian was still in control and there was little resistance. Before retirement, Maximian would receive one final moment of glory by officiating at the Secular Games in 304.[114]

On May 1, 305, in separate ceremonies in Milan and Nicomedia, Diocletian and Maximian retired simultaneously. The succession did not go not entirely to Maximian's liking: perhaps because of Galerius' influence, Severus and Maximinus were appointed Caesar, thus excluding Maxentius. Both the newly appointed Caesars had had long military careers and were close to Galerius: Severus was his nephew and Maximinus a former army comrade.[115] Maximian quickly soured to the new tetrarchy, which saw Galerius assume the dominant position Diocletian once held. Although Maximian led the ceremony that proclaimed Severus Caesar, within two years he was sufficiently dissatisfied to support his son's rebellion against the new regime.[116] Diocletian retired to the expansive palace he had built in his homeland, Dalmatia near Salona on the Adriatic. Maximian retired to villas in Campania or Lucania, where he lived a life of ease and luxury.[117] Although far from the political centers of the empire, Diocletian and Maximian remained close enough to stay in regular contact.[118]

Maxentius' rebellion

After the death of Constantius on July 25 306, Constantine assumed the title of Augustus. This displeased Galerius, who instead offered Constantine the title of Caesar, which Constantine accepted. The title of Augustus then went to Severus.[119] Maxentius was jealous of Constantine's power, and on October 28 306, he persuaded a cohort of imperial guardsmen to declare him emperor. Uncomfortable with sole leadership, Maxentius sent a set of imperial robes to Maximian and saluted him as "Augustus for the second time", offering him theoretic equal rule but less actual power and a lower rank.[120]

Galerius refused to recognize Maxentius and sent Severus with an army to Rome to depose him. As many of Severus' soldiers had served under Maximian, and had taken Maxentius' bribes, most of the army defected to Maxentius. Severus fled to Ravenna, which Maximian besieged. The city was strongly fortified so Maximian offered terms, which Severus accepted. Maximian then seized Severus and took him under guard to a public villa in southern Rome, where he was kept as a hostage. In the autumn of 307, Galerius led a second force against Maxentius but he again failed to take Rome, and retreated north with his army mostly intact.[121]

Dresden bust of Maxentius

While Maxentius built up Rome's defenses, Maximian made his way to Gaul to negotiate with Constantine. A deal was struck in which Contantine would marry Maximian's younger daughter Fausta and be elevated to Augustan rank in Maxentius' secessionist regime. In return, Constantine would reaffirm the old family alliance between Maximian and Constantius, and support Maxentius' cause in Italy but would remain neutral in the war with Galerius. The deal was sealed with a double ceremony in Trier in the late summer of 307, at which Constantine married Fausta and was declared Augustus by Maximian.[122]

Maximian returned to Rome in the winter of 307–8 but soon fell out with his son and in the spring of 308 challenged his right to rule before an assembly of Roman soldiers. He spoke of Rome's sickly government, disparaged Maxentius for having weakened it, and ripped the imperial toga from Maxentius' shoulders. He expected the soldiers to recognize him but they sided with Maxentius, and Maximian was forced to leave Italy in disgrace.[123]

On November 11 308, to resolve the political instability, Galerius called Diocletian (out of retirement) and Maximian to a general council meeting at the military city of Carnuntum on the upper Danube. There, Maximian was forced again to abdicate again and Constantine was again demoted to Caesar. Licinius, a loyal military companion to Galerius, was appointed Augustus of the West.[124] In early 309 Maximian returned to the court of Constantine in Gaul, the only court that would still accept him.[125]

Rebellion against Constantine

In 310, Maximian rebelled against Constantine while the emperor was on campaign against the Franks. Maximian had been sent south to Arles with part of Constantine's army to defend against attacks by Maxentius in southern Gaul. In Arles, Maximian announced that Constantine was dead and took up the imperial purple. In spite offering bribes to any who would support him as emperor, most of Constantine's army remained loyal, and Maximian was compelled to leave. Constantine soon heard of the rebellion, abandoned his campaign against the Franks, and moved quickly to southern Gaul, where he confronted the fleeing Maximian at Massilia (Marseille). The town was better able to withstand a long siege than Arles, but it made little difference as loyal citizens opened the rear gates to Constantine. Maximian was captured, reproved for his crimes, and stripped of his title for the third and last time. Constantine granted Maximian some clemency but strongly encouraged his suicide. In July 310, Maximian hanged himself.[126]

Despite the earlier rupture in relations, after Maximian's suicide Maxentius presented himself as his father's devoted son.[127] He minted coins bearing his father's deified image and proclaimed his desire to avenge his death.[128]

Constantine initially presented the suicide as an unfortunate family tragedy. By 311, however, he was spreading another version. According to this, after Constantine had pardoned him, Maximian planned to murder Constantine in his sleep. Fausta learned of the plot and warned Constantine, who put a eunuch in his own place in bed. Maximian was apprehended when he killed the eunuch and was offered suicide, which he accepted.[129] In addition to the propaganda, Constantine instituted a damnatio memoriae on Maximian, destroying all inscriptions referring to him and eliminating any public work bearing his image.[130]

Constantine defeated Maxentius at the Battle of the Milvian Bridge on October 28 312. Maxentius died, and Italy came under Constantine's rule.[131] Eutropia swore on oath that Maxentius was not Maximian's son, and Maximian's memory was rehabilitated. His apotheosis under Maxentius was declared null and void, and he was re-consecrated as a god, probably in 317. He began appearing on Constantine's coinage as divus, or divine, by 318, together with the deified Constantius and Claudius Gothicus.[132] The three were hailed as Constantine's forbears. They were called "the best of emperors".[133] Through his daughters Fausta and Flavia, Maximian was grandfather or great-grandfather to every reigning emperor from 337 to 363.[134]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ a b Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 6; Barnes, New Empire, 4.
  2. ^ a b Potter, 280–81.
  3. ^ a b c Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 6–7; Potter, 282; Southern, 141–42. The chronology of Maximian's appointment to Augustus is somewhat uncertain (Corcoran, "Before Constantine", 40; Southern, 142). It is sometimes suggested that Maximian was appointed Augustus from July 285, and never appointed Caesar. This suggestion has not received much support (Potter, 281; Southern, 142; following De Casearibus 39.17).
  4. ^ a b Barnes, New Empire, 4.
  5. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 32–34; Barnes, New Empire, 13; Elliott, 42–43; Lenski, 65; Odahl, 90–91; Pohlsander, Emperor Constantine, 17; Potter, 349–50; Treadgold, 29.
  6. ^ Barnes, New Empire, 13.
  7. ^ For full titulature, see: Barnes, New Empire, 17–29.
  8. ^ a b c Barnes, New Empire, 32.
  9. ^ Epitome de Caesaribus 40.10, quoted in Barnes, New Empire, 32; Barnes, New Empire, 32; Rees, Layers of Loyalty, 30; Williams, 43–44.
  10. ^ Victor, Liber de Caesaribus 39.26, quoted in Barnes, New Empire, 32.
  11. ^ Panegrici Latini 10(2).2.2ff, quoted in Barnes, New Empire, 32.
  12. ^ Panegrici Latini 10(2).2.4, quoted in Rees, Layers of Loyalty, 44–45.
  13. ^ Barnes, New Empire, 32–33; Rees, Layers of Loyalty, 30.
  14. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 6; Williams, 43–44.
  15. ^ Victor, Liber de Caesaribus 39, quoted in Williams, 44.
  16. ^ Panegyrici Latini 10(2), quoted in Williams, 44.
  17. ^ Williams, 44.
  18. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 13.
  19. ^ Lactantius, DMP 8, quoted in Williams, 44.
  20. ^ Barnes, New Empire, 34. Barnes dates Maxentius' birth to circa 283, when Maximian was in Syria, and Fausta's birth to 289 or 290 (Barnes, New Empire, 34).
  21. ^ Aurelius Victor, de Caesaribus 39.25; Eutropius, Breviaria 9.22; Jerome, Chronicle 225g; Epitome de Caesaribus 39.2, 40.12, quoted in Barnes, New Empire, 33; Barnes, New Empire, 33.
  22. ^ Origo Constantini 2; Philostorgius, Historia Ecclesiastica 2.16a, quoted in Barnes, New Empire, 33. See also Panegyrici Latini 10(2)11.4.
  23. ^ Barnes, New Empire, 33–34.
  24. ^ The event has been dated to both July 21 (Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 6; Barnes, New Empire, 4) and July 25 (Potter, 280–81).
  25. ^ Bleckmann; Corcoran, "Before Constantine", 40.
  26. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 6; Rees, Layers of Loyalty, 30; Southern, 136.
  27. ^ Williams, 45.
  28. ^ Potter, 280; Southern, 136; Williams, 43.
  29. ^ Odahl, 42–43; Southern, 136, 331; Williams, 45.
  30. ^ Potter, 280.
  31. ^ Corcoran, "Before Constantine", 40.
  32. ^ Corcoran, "Before Constantine", 40; Liebeschuetz, Continuity and Change, 235–52, 240–43; Odahl, 43–44; Rees, Layers of Loyalty, 32–33.
  33. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 11–12; Corcoran, "Before Constantine", 40; Odahl, 43; Rees, Layers of Loyalty, 32–33, 39, 42–52; Southern, 136–37; Williams, 58–59.
  34. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 11.
  35. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 6; Southern, 137; Williams, 45–46.
  36. ^ Rees, Layers of Loyalty, 29.
  37. ^ Eutropius, Brev. 9.20; Aurelius Victor, de Caesaribus, 39.17, quoted in Rees, Layers of Loyalty, 29–30.
  38. ^ Potter, 281–82.
  39. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 6; Barnes, New Empire, 10; Rees, Layers of Loyalty, 30; Southern, 137; Williams, 45–46.
  40. ^ Barnes, New Empire, 57.
  41. ^ Southern, 137.
  42. ^ Panegyrici Latini 10(2), quoted in Williams, 46; Southern, 137.
  43. ^ Southern, 139–138; Williams, 46.
  44. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 6; Barnes, New Empire, 57; Rees, Layers of Loyalty, 31.
  45. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 6.
  46. ^ Williams, 46.
  47. ^ Potter, 282–83. Potter and Barnes (New Empire, 56) favor Trier; Williams (Diocletian, 46) favors Mainz.
  48. ^ Southern, 138; Williams, 46.
  49. ^ Potter, 284.
  50. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 6; Barnes, New Empire, 57.
  51. ^ Southern, 138; Williams, 46–47.
  52. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 6–7; Potter, 283–84; Southern, 137–41; Williams, 47.
  53. ^ Potter, 284; Southern, 139–40; Williams, 47. Most of the information for the legions under Carausius' control comes from his coinage. Strangely, Legio VI Victrix from Eboracum (York, United Kingdom), which, for geographical regions, should have been included in the legions Carausius had control over, generally is not (Southern, 332). The Panegyrici Latini 8(4)12.1 admits one continental legion joined him, probably the XXX Ulpia Victrix (Potter, 650).
  54. ^ a b Williams, 47.
  55. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 7; Southern, 140.
  56. ^ Williams, 47–48.
  57. ^ Potter, 284; Williams, 61–62.
  58. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 7; Bleckmann; Corcoran, "Before Constantine", 40; Potter, 282; Southern, 141–42; Williams, 48.
  59. ^ Williams, 48.
  60. ^ Potter, 282, 649. Diocletian would have been somewhere between Byzantium (Istanbul, Turkey), where he is attested for March 22 286 and Tiberias, where he is attested from May 31 286 through August 31 (Barnes, New Empire, 50–51; Potter, 282, 649).
  61. ^ Potter, 282, 649.
  62. ^ Potter, 282; Williams, 49.
  63. ^ Potter, 283; Williams, 49, 65.
  64. ^ Panegyrici Latini 10(2)9.4, quoted in Potter, 283.
  65. ^ Potter, 283; Williams, 49, 65.
  66. ^ Potter, 283.
  67. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 7; Corcoran, "Before Constantine", 40.
  68. ^ Southern, 141; Williams, 50.
  69. ^ a b c d Williams, 50.
  70. ^ Southern, 142. Barnes' New Empire records five dates for the period: the first, February 10 286 at Milan (Codex Justinianus 8.53(54).6; Fragmenta Vaticana 282); June 21 286 at Mainz (Fragmenta Vaticana 271); January 1 287 Trier or Cologne or Mainz (date of consular assumption, Panegyrici Latini 10(2).6.2 ff.); and 287, his "expedition across the Rhine" (Panegyrici Latini 10(2).7.1ff.) (Barnes, New Empire, 57).
  71. ^ a b c d Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 7.
  72. ^ Barnes, New Empire, 57; Williams, 50.
  73. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 7; Southern, 142–43; Williams, 50.
  74. ^ Barnes, New Empire, 57; Rees, Layers of Loyalty, 31.
  75. ^ Rees, Layers of Loyalty, 31; Southern, 142–43; Williams, 50. Barnes (Constantine and Eusebius, 7) dates the meeting to after the campaign against the Alamanni.
  76. ^ Southern, 142–43; Williams, 50.
  77. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 7; Corcoran, "Before Constantine", 40; Southern, 143; Williams, 50.
  78. ^ a b c Williams, 50–51.
  79. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 7; Williams, 51.
  80. ^ Southern, 143.
  81. ^ Panegyrici Latini 8(5)12.2; Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 7, 288; Potter, 284–85, 650; Southern, 143; Williams, 55.
  82. ^ Southern, 143; Williams, 55.
  83. ^ Potter, 285; Southern, 144.
  84. ^ Codex Justinianus 9.41.9; Barnes, New Empire, 51; Potter, 285, 650.
  85. ^ Codex Justinianus 6.30.6; Barnes, New Empire, 52; Potter, 285, 650.
  86. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 8; Potter, 285.
  87. ^ Panegyrici Latini 11(3)10, quoted in Williams, 57.
  88. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 8; Potter, 285, 288; Rees, Layers of Loyalty, 69.
  89. ^ Potter, 285; Rees, Layers of Loyalty, 69.
  90. ^ Panegyrici Latini 11(3)2.4, 8.1, 11.3–4, 12.2; Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 8, 288; Potter, 285, 650.
  91. ^ Potter, 285.
  92. ^ Williams, 55–56, 62.
  93. ^ Williams, 62–64.
  94. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 8–9; Barnes, New Empire, 4, 36–37; Potter, 288; Southern, 146; Williams, 64–65.
  95. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 8–9; Barnes, New Empire, 4, 38; Potter, 288; Southern, 146; Williams, 64–65.
  96. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 8, 15; Williams, 71.
  97. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 15; Potter, 288; Rees, Layers of Loyalty, 99; Southern, 149–50; Williams, 71–72.
  98. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 15–16; Barnes, New Empire, 255.
  99. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 15–16; Southern, 150.
  100. ^ Barnes, New Empire, 58–59.
  101. ^ Barnes, New Empire, 59; Southern, 150; Williams, 73.
  102. ^ Southern, 150; Williams, 73–74; Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 16.
  103. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 16; Southern, 150; Williams, 75.
  104. ^ a b c d Williams, 75.
  105. ^ Barnes, New Empire, 59.
  106. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 16.
  107. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 16; Barnes, New Empire, 59.
  108. ^ Barnes, New Empire, 59; Williams, 75.
  109. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 16; Barnes, New Empire, 59.
  110. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 16; Barnes, New Empire, 56.
  111. ^ Lactantius, DMP 8.4; Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 16.
  112. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 16.
  113. ^ Panegyrici Latini 7(6)15.16; Lactantius DMP 20.4; Potter, 340; Southern, 152, 336.
  114. ^ Potter, 340.
  115. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 25–27; Williams, 191.
  116. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 25–27; Potter, 341–42.
  117. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 27; Southern, 152.
  118. ^ Southern, 152.
  119. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 27–28; Barnes, New Empire, 5; Lenski, 61–62; Odahl, 78–79.
  120. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 30–32.
  121. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 30–31; Elliott, 41–42; Lenski, 62–63; Odahl, 86–87; Potter, 348–49.
  122. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 31; Lenski, 64; Odahl, 87–88; Pohlsander, Emperor Constantine, 15–16.
  123. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 32; Lenski, 64; Odahl, 89, 93.
  124. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 32–34; Elliott, 42–43; Lenski, 65; Odahl, 90–91; Pohlsander, Emperor Constantine, 17; Potter, 349–50; Treadgold, 29.
  125. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 32.
  126. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 34–35; Elliott, 43; Lenski, 65–66; Odahl, 93; Pohlsander, Emperor Constantine, 17; Potter, 352.
  127. ^ Elliott, 43; Lenski, 68; Pohlsander, Emperor Constantine, 20.
  128. ^ Barnes, New Empire, 34; Elliott, 45; Lenski, 68.
  129. ^ Lactantius, DMP 30.1; Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 40–41, 305.
  130. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 41; Lenski, 68.
  131. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 42–44.
  132. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 47; Barnes, New Empire, 35.
  133. ^ Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius, 47.
  134. ^ Barnes, New Empire, 265–66.

References

  • Barnes, Timothy D. Constantine and Eusebius. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981. ISBN 978-0674165311
  • Barnes, Timothy D. The New Empire of Diocletian and Constantine. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982. ISBN 0783722214
  • Bowman, Alan K., Peter Garnsey, and Averil Cameron. The Cambridge Ancient History, Volume XII: The Crisis of Empire. Cambridge University Press, 2005. ISBN 0-521-30199-8
  • Corcoran, Simon. The Empire of the Tetrarchs: Imperial Pronouncements and Government, AD 284–324. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996. ISBN 019815304X
  • Corcoran, Simon. "Before Constantine." In The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Constantine, edited by Noel Lenski, 35–58. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Hardcover ISBN 0-521-81838-9 Paperback ISBN 0-521-52157-2
  • DiMaio, Jr., Michael. "Constantius I Chlorus (305–306 A.D.)." De Imperatoribus Romanis (1996a). Accessed March 8, 2008.
  • DiMaio, Jr., Michael. "Galerius (305–311 A.D.)." De Imperatoribus Romanis (1996b). Accessed March 8, 2008.
  • DiMaio, Jr., Michael. "Maximianus Herculius (286–305 A.D)." De Imperatoribus Romanis (1997a). Accessed March 8, 2008.
  • DiMaio, Jr., Michael. "Maxentius (306–312 A.D.)." De Imperatoribus Romanis (1997b). Accessed April 5, 2008.
  • Elliott, T. G. The Christianity of Constantine the Great. Scranton, PA: University of Scranton Press, 1996. ISBN 0-940866-59-5
  • Lenski, Noel. "The Reign of Constantine." In The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Constantine, edited by Noel Lenski, 59–90. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Hardcover ISBN 0-521-81838-9 Paperback ISBN 0-521-52157-2
  • Liebeschuetz, J. H. W. G. Continuity and Change in Roman Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979. ISBN 0-19-814822-4.
  • Mackay, Christopher S. "Lactantius and the Succession to Diocletian." Classical Philology 94:2 (1999): 198–209.
  • Mathisen, Ralph W. "Diocletian (284–305 A.D.)." De Imperatoribus Romanis (1997). Accessed February 16, 2008.
  • Odahl, Charles Matson. Constantine and the Christian Empire. New York: Routledge, 2004. Hardcover ISBN 0-415-17485-6 Paperback ISBN 0-415-38655-1
  • Pohlsander, Hans. The Emperor Constantine. London & New York: Routledge, 2004a. Hardcover ISBN 0-415-31937-4 Paperback ISBN 0-415-31938-2
  • Pohlsander, Hans. "Constantine I (306 - 337 A.D.)." De Imperatoribus Romanis (2004b). Accessed December 16, 2007.
  • Potter, David S. The Roman Empire at Bay: AD 180–395. New York: Routledge, 2005. Hardcover ISBN 0-415-10057-7 Paperback ISBN 0-415-10058-5
  • Rees, Roger. Layers of Loyalty in Latin Panegyric: AD 289–307. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002. ISBN 0-19-924918-0
  • Rees, Roger. Diocletian and the Tetrarchy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2004. ISBN 0-7486-1661-6
  • Southern, Pat. The Roman Empire from Severus to Constantine. New York: Routledge, 2001. ISBN 0-415-23944-3
  • Williams, Stephen. Diocletian and the Roman Recovery. New York: Routledge, 1997. ISBN 0-415-91827-8

External links

  • A Detailed Chronology of the Tetrarchy until 324 AD
  • Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). "Maximianus" . Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.

Template:Roman Emperor

Preceded by
Marcus Iunius Maximus, Vettius Aquilinus
Consul
287, with Diocletian
Succeeded by
Maximian, Januarianus
Preceded by
Maximian, Diocletian
Consul
288, with Januarianus
Succeeded by
Marcus Magrius Bassus, Lucius Ragonius Quintianus
Preceded by
Marcus Magrius Bassus, Lucius Ragonius Quintianus
Consul
290, with Diocletian
Succeeded by
Caius Junius Tiberianus, Cassius Dion
Preceded by
Hannibalianus, Asclepiodotus
Consul
293, with Diocletian
Succeeded by
Preceded by
Diocletian, Constantius
Consul
297, with Galerius
Succeeded by
Anicius Faustus, Virius Gallus
Preceded by
Anicius Faustus, Virius Gallus
Consul
299, with Diocletian
Succeeded by
Constantius, Galerius
Preceded by
Constantius, Galerius
Consul
303, with Diocletian
Succeeded by
Diocletian, Maximian
Preceded by
Diocletian, Maximian
Consul
304, with Diocletian
Succeeded by
Constantius, Galerius
Preceded by
Constantius, Galerius
Consul
307 (ca. September–December), with Constantine
From 307 on, different consuls are attested in the regions administered by Galerius, Constantine, and Maxentius. Maximian is attested only in Constantine's domains.
Succeeded by
Diocletian, Galerius