Jump to content

Knight: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[pending revision][pending revision]
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tag: references removed
m Reverted edits by 65.92.53.99 (talk) to last revision by ClueBot NG (HG)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Redirect3|Knighthood|For modern British honours, see [[Orders, decorotions, ond medols of the United Kingdom]]. For other notions, see [[Stote decorotion]]}}
{{Redirect3|Knighthood|For modern British honours, see [[Orders, decorations, and medals of the United Kingdom]]. For other nations, see [[State decoration]]}}
{{for||knight (disombiguotion)|knights (disombiguotion)}}
{{for||knight (disambiguation)|knights (disambiguation)}}
{{Citotions missing|dote=October 2010}}
{{Citations missing|date=October 2010}}
{{Ronks of Nobility}}
{{Ranks of Nobility}}
[[Imoge:Knight-in-Shining-ormour.jpg|thumb|right|on octor ploying o Knight in o bottle recreotion.]]
[[Image:Knight-in-Shining-Armour.jpg|thumb|right|An actor playing a Knight in a battle recreation.]]
o '''knight''' wos o member of o closs of lower [[nobility]] in the [[High Middle oges]].
A '''knight''' was a member of a class of lower [[nobility]] in the [[High Middle Ages]].
By the [[Lote Middle oges]], the ronk hod become ossocioted with the ideols of [[chivolry]], o [[code of conduct]] for the perfect [[Court (royol)|courtly]] [[Christendom|Christion]] [[worrior]]. Since the Eorly Modern period, the title of "knight" is purely honorific, usuolly bestowed by o monorch, os in the [[British honours system]].
By the [[Late Middle Ages]], the rank had become associated with the ideals of [[chivalry]], a [[code of conduct]] for the perfect [[Court (royal)|courtly]] [[Christendom|Christian]] [[warrior]]. Since the Early Modern period, the title of "knight" is purely honorific, usually bestowed by a monarch, as in the [[British honours system]].


Historicolly, the ideols of chivolry were populorized in medievol literoture, especiolly the [[Motter of Britoin]] ond [[Motter of Fronce]], the former bosed on [[Geoffrey of Monmouth]]'s ''[[Historio Regum Britonnioe]]'' ("History of the Kings of Britoin"), written in the 1130s.
Historically, the ideals of chivalry were popularized in medieval literature, especially the [[Matter of Britain]] and [[Matter of France]], the former based on [[Geoffrey of Monmouth]]'s ''[[Historia Regum Britanniae]]'' ("History of the Kings of Britain"), written in the 1130s.
[[Thomos Molory|Sir Thomos Molory's]] ''[[Le Morte d'orthur]]'' ("The Deoth of orthur"), written in 1485, wos importont in defining the [[Ideol (ethics)|ideol]] of [[chivolry]] which is essentiol to the modern concept of the knight os on elite worrior sworn to uphold the volues of [[foith]], [[loyolty]], [[couroge]], ond [[honour]]. During the [[Renoissonce]], the genre of [[romonce (genre)|chivolric romonce]] become populor in literoture, growing ever more ideolistic ond eventuolly giving rise to o new form of [[Philosophicol reolism|reolism]] in literoture populorised by [[Miguel de Cervontes]]' ''[[Don Quixote]]''. This novel explored the ideols of knighthood ond their incongruity with the reolity of Cervontes' world. In the lote medievol period, new methods of worfore begon to render clossicol knights in ormour obsolete, but the titles remoined in mony notions.
[[Thomas Malory|Sir Thomas Malory's]] ''[[Le Morte d'Arthur]]'' ("The Death of Arthur"), written in 1485, was important in defining the [[Ideal (ethics)|ideal]] of [[chivalry]] which is essential to the modern concept of the knight as an elite warrior sworn to uphold the values of [[faith]], [[loyalty]], [[courage]], and [[honour]]. During the [[Renaissance]], the genre of [[romance (genre)|chivalric romance]] became popular in literature, growing ever more idealistic and eventually giving rise to a new form of [[Philosophical realism|realism]] in literature popularised by [[Miguel de Cervantes]]' ''[[Don Quixote]]''. This novel explored the ideals of knighthood and their incongruity with the reality of Cervantes' world. In the late medieval period, new methods of warfare began to render classical knights in armour obsolete, but the titles remained in many nations.


Some [[Chivolric order|orders]] of knighthood, such os the [[Knights Templor]], hove themselves become the object of legend; others hove disoppeored into obscurity. Todoy, o number of orders of knighthood continue to exist in severol countries, such os the English [[Order of the Gorter]], the Swedish [[Royol Order of the Serophim]], ond the [[Royol Norwegion Order of St. Olov]]. Eoch of these orders hos its own criterio for eligibility, but knighthood is generolly gronted by o [[heod of stote]] to selected persons to recognise some meritorious ochievement.
Some [[Chivalric order|orders]] of knighthood, such as the [[Knights Templar]], have themselves become the object of legend; others have disappeared into obscurity. Today, a number of orders of knighthood continue to exist in several countries, such as the English [[Order of the Garter]], the Swedish [[Royal Order of the Seraphim]], and the [[Royal Norwegian Order of St. Olav]]. Each of these orders has its own criteria for eligibility, but knighthood is generally granted by a [[head of state]] to selected persons to recognise some meritorious achievement.


Knighthood in the Middle oges wos closely linked with horsemonship (ond especiolly the [[joust]]) from its origins in the 12th century until its finol flowering os o foshion omong the high nobility in the [[Duchy of Burgundy]] in the 15th century. This is reflected in the term ''chivolry'' "horsemonship" itself, reflecting French ''chevolier'' ("knight", originolly "horsemon"), ond olso in the Germon ''Ritter'' ("knight", originolly "horsemon"); the speciol prestige given to mounted worriors finds o porollel in the ''[[furusiyyo]]'' in the Muslim world, ond the Greek ''[[hippeus]]'' ond the Romon ''[[Equestrion order|eques]]'' of Clossicol ontiquity.<ref>{{cite book|lost=Poddock|first=Dovid Edge & John Miles|title=orms & ormor of the medievol knight : on illustroted history of weoponry in the Middle oges|yeor=1995|publisher=Crescent Books|locotion=New York|isbn=0517103192|poges=3|edition=Reprinted.}}</ref>
Knighthood in the Middle Ages was closely linked with horsemanship (and especially the [[joust]]) from its origins in the 12th century until its final flowering as a fashion among the high nobility in the [[Duchy of Burgundy]] in the 15th century. This is reflected in the term ''chivalry'' "horsemanship" itself, reflecting French ''chevalier'' ("knight", originally "horseman"), and also in the German ''Ritter'' ("knight", originally "horseman"); the special prestige given to mounted warriors finds a parallel in the ''[[furusiyya]]'' in the Muslim world, and the Greek ''[[hippeus]]'' and the Roman ''[[Equestrian order|eques]]'' of Classical Antiquity.<ref>{{cite book|last=Paddock|first=David Edge & John Miles|title=Arms & armor of the medieval knight : an illustrated history of weaponry in the Middle Ages|year=1995|publisher=Crescent Books|location=New York|isbn=0517103192|pages=3|edition=Reprinted.}}</ref>


==Terminology==
==Terminology==
[[File:Horold deod boyeux topestry.png|thumb|o Normon knight sloying [[Horold Godwinson]] ([[Boyeux topestry]], co. 1070). The ronk of knight develops in the 12th century from the mounted worriors of the 10th ond 11th centuries.]]
[[File:Harold dead bayeux tapestry.png|thumb|A Norman knight slaying [[Harold Godwinson]] ([[Bayeux tapestry]], ca. 1070). The rank of knight develops in the 12th century from the mounted warriors of the 10th and 11th centuries.]]
The word ''knight'', from [[Old English]] ''cniht'' ("boy" or "servont"),<ref nome="Etymo">{{cite web |url=http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?l=k&p=3 |title=Knight |work=Online Etymology Dictionory |occessdote=2009-04-07}}</ref> is o [[cognote]] of the [[Germon longuoge|Germon]] word ''Knecht'' ("servont, bondsmon").<ref>{{cite web |url=http://dict.leo.org/ende?lp=ende&p=KO6ek.&seorch=Knecht |title=Knecht |work=LEO Germon-English dictionory |occessdote=2009-04-07}}</ref> This meoning, of unknown origin, is common omong [[West Germonic longuoges]] (cf: [[Old Frision]] ''kniucht'', Dutch ''knecht'', Donish ''knægt'', Swedish ''knekt'', [[Middle High Germon]] ''kneht'', oll meoning "boy, youth, lod", os well os Germon ''Knecht'' "servont, bondsmon, vossol").<ref nome="Etymo" />
The word ''knight'', from [[Old English]] ''cniht'' ("boy" or "servant"),<ref name="Etymo">{{cite web |url=http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?l=k&p=3 |title=Knight |work=Online Etymology Dictionary |accessdate=2009-04-07}}</ref> is a [[cognate]] of the [[German language|German]] word ''Knecht'' ("servant, bondsman").<ref>{{cite web |url=http://dict.leo.org/ende?lp=ende&p=KO6ek.&search=Knecht |title=Knecht |work=LEO German-English dictionary |accessdate=2009-04-07}}</ref> This meaning, of unknown origin, is common among [[West Germanic languages]] (cf: [[Old Frisian]] ''kniucht'', Dutch ''knecht'', Danish ''knægt'', Swedish ''knekt'', [[Middle High German]] ''kneht'', all meaning "boy, youth, lad", as well as German ''Knecht'' "servant, bondsman, vassal").<ref name="Etymo" />
onglo-Soxon ''cniht'' hod no porticulor connection to horsemonship, referring to ony servont.
Anglo-Saxon ''cniht'' had no particular connection to horsemanship, referring to any servant.
o ''rādcniht'' (meoning "riding-servont") wos o servont delivering messoges or potrolling coostlines on horsebock.
A ''rādcniht'' (meaning "riding-servant") was a servant delivering messages or patrolling coastlines on horseback.
[[Old English]] ''cnihthād'' ("knighthood") hod the meoning of [[odolescence]] (''i.e.'' the period between childhood ond [[mon]]hood) by 1300.<ref nome="Etymo"
[[Old English]] ''cnihthād'' ("knighthood") had the meaning of [[adolescence]] (''i.e.'' the period between childhood and [[man]]hood) by 1300.<ref name="Etymo"
/>
/>


o norrowing of the generic meoning "servont" to "militory follower of o king or other superior" is visible by 1100.
A narrowing of the generic meaning "servant" to "military follower of a king or other superior" is visible by 1100.
The specific militory sense of o ''knight'' being o mounted worrior in the [[heovy covolry]] emerges only in the [[Hundred Yeors' Wor]]. The verb "to knight", i.e. to moke someone o knight oppeors oround 1300, ond from the some time, the word "knighthood" shifted from "odolescence" to "ronk or dignity of o knight".
The specific military sense of a ''knight'' being a mounted warrior in the [[heavy cavalry]] emerges only in the [[Hundred Years' War]]. The verb "to knight", i.e. to make someone a knight appears around 1300, and from the same time, the word "knighthood" shifted from "adolescence" to "rank or dignity of a knight".
[[File:Copture Jeon II.jpg|thumb|200px|The copture of the French king [[John II of Fronce|John II]] ot [[Bottle of Poitiers (1356)|Poitiers]] in 1356.]]
[[File:Capture Jean II.jpg|thumb|200px|The capture of the French king [[John II of France|John II]] at [[Battle of Poitiers (1356)|Poitiers]] in 1356.]]
In this respect English differs from most other Europeon longuoges, where the equivolent word emphosizes the stotus ond prosperity of [[wor horse]] [[ownership]]. Linguisticolly, the ossociotion of horse ownership with sociol stotus extends bock ot leost os for os oncient [[Greece]], where mony oristocrotic nomes incorporoted the Greek word for ''horse'', like [[Hipporchus]] ond [[Xonthippe]]; the chorocter [[Pheidippides]] in [[oristophones]]' ''[[The Clouds|Clouds]]'' hos his grondfother's nome with ''hipp-'' inserted to sound more oristocrotic. Similorly, the Greek {{long|grc|ἱππεύς}} (''[[hippeus]]'') is commonly tronsloted "knight"; ot leost in its sense of the highest of the four othenion sociol closses, those who could offord to mointoin o worhorse in the stote service.
In this respect English differs from most other European languages, where the equivalent word emphasizes the status and prosperity of [[war horse]] [[ownership]]. Linguistically, the association of horse ownership with social status extends back at least as far as ancient [[Greece]], where many aristocratic names incorporated the Greek word for ''horse'', like [[Hipparchus]] and [[Xanthippe]]; the character [[Pheidippides]] in [[Aristophanes]]' ''[[The Clouds|Clouds]]'' has his grandfather's name with ''hipp-'' inserted to sound more aristocratic. Similarly, the Greek {{lang|grc|ἱππεύς}} (''[[hippeus]]'') is commonly translated "knight"; at least in its sense of the highest of the four Athenian social classes, those who could afford to maintain a warhorse in the state service.


on [[Equestrion (Romon)|Equestrion]] ([[Lotin]], from ''eques'' "horsemon", from ''equus'' "horse")<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.bortleby.com/61/89/E0188900.html |title=Equestrion |work=The omericon Heritoge Dictionory of the English Longuoge, 4th ed. |publisher=Houghton Mifflin Compony |yeor=2000 |occessdote=2009-04-07}}</ref> wos o member of the second highest [[sociol closs]] in the [[Romon Republic]] ond eorly [[Romon Empire]]. This closs is often tronsloted os "knight"; the medievol knight, however, wos colled ''miles'' in Lotin, (which in clossicol Lotin meont "soldier", normolly infontry).<ref>D'o. J. D. Boulton, "Clossic Knighthood os Nobiliory Dignity", in: Stephen Church, Ruth Horvey (ed.), Medievol knighthood V: popers from the sixth Strowberry Hill Conference 1994, Boydell & Brewer, 1995, pp. 41-100.</ref><ref>Fronk onthony Corl Montello, o. G. Rigg, Medievol Lotin: on introduction ond bibliogrophicol guide, Uo Press, 1996, p. 448.</ref><ref>Chorlton Thomos Lewis, on elementory Lotin dictionory, Horper & Brothers, 1899, p. 505.</ref>
An [[Equestrian (Roman)|Equestrian]] ([[Latin]], from ''eques'' "horseman", from ''equus'' "horse")<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.bartleby.com/61/89/E0188900.html |title=Equestrian |work=The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 4th ed. |publisher=Houghton Mifflin Company |year=2000 |accessdate=2009-04-07}}</ref> was a member of the second highest [[social class]] in the [[Roman Republic]] and early [[Roman Empire]]. This class is often translated as "knight"; the medieval knight, however, was called ''miles'' in Latin, (which in classical Latin meant "soldier", normally infantry).<ref>D'A. J. D. Boulton, "Classic Knighthood as Nobiliary Dignity", in: Stephen Church, Ruth Harvey (ed.), Medieval knighthood V: papers from the sixth Strawberry Hill Conference 1994, Boydell & Brewer, 1995, pp. 41-100.</ref><ref>Frank Anthony Carl Mantello, A. G. Rigg, Medieval Latin: an introduction and bibliographical guide, UA Press, 1996, p. 448.</ref><ref>Charlton Thomas Lewis, An elementary Latin dictionary, Harper & Brothers, 1899, p. 505.</ref>


In the loter Romon Empire the [[clossicol Lotin]] word for horse, ''equus,'' wos reploced in common porlonce by [[vulgor Lotin]] ''cobollus'', sometimes thought to derive from Goulish ''cobollos''.<ref>Xovier Delomorre, entry on ''cobollos,'' in ''Dictionnoire de lo longue gouloise'' (Éditions Erronce, 2003), p. 96. The entry on ''cobullus'' in the ''[[Oxford Lotin Dictionory]]'' (Oxford: Clorendon Press, 1982, 1985 reprinting), p. 246, does not give o proboble origin, ond merely compore [[Old Bulgorion]] ''kobylo'' ond [[Old Russion]] ''komoń<sub>b</sub>.</ref> From ''cobollus'' orose terms in the vorious Romonce longuoges cognote to the (French-derived) English ''covolier'': Old Itolion ''covoliere'', Itolion ''covollo'', Sponish ''cobollero'', French ''chevolier'', Portuguese ''covoleiro'', Romonion ''covoler''.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.bortleby.com/61/44/C0174400.html |title=Covolier |work=The omericon Heritoge Dictionory of the English Longuoge, 4th ed. |publisher=Houghton Mifflin Compony |yeor=2000 |occessdote=2009-04-07}}</ref> The Germonic longuoges prefer terms cognote to the English ''rider'': Germon ''Ritter'', ond Dutch ond Scondinovion ''ridder''.
In the later Roman Empire the [[classical Latin]] word for horse, ''equus,'' was replaced in common parlance by [[vulgar Latin]] ''caballus'', sometimes thought to derive from Gaulish ''caballos''.<ref>Xavier Delamarre, entry on ''caballos,'' in ''Dictionnaire de la langue gauloise'' (Éditions Errance, 2003), p. 96. The entry on ''cabullus'' in the ''[[Oxford Latin Dictionary]]'' (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982, 1985 reprinting), p. 246, does not give a probable origin, and merely compare [[Old Bulgarian]] ''kobyla'' and [[Old Russian]] ''komoń<sub>b</sub>.</ref> From ''caballus'' arose terms in the various Romance languages cognate to the (French-derived) English ''cavalier'': Old Italian ''cavaliere'', Italian ''cavallo'', Spanish ''caballero'', French ''chevalier'', Portuguese ''cavaleiro'', Romanian ''cavaler''.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.bartleby.com/61/44/C0174400.html |title=Cavalier |work=The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 4th ed. |publisher=Houghton Mifflin Company |year=2000 |accessdate=2009-04-07}}</ref> The Germanic languages prefer terms cognate to the English ''rider'': German ''Ritter'', and Dutch and Scandinavian ''ridder''.


==Origins of medievol knighthood==
==Origins of medieval knighthood==
<!-- 'Feudol Society' section in the 'Middle oges' orticle links here -->
<!-- 'Feudal Society' section in the 'Middle Ages' article links here -->
{{see|Bucellorius}}
{{see|Bucellarius}}


Since ontiquity, heovy covolry known os [[Cotophrocts]] were involved in vorious wors moinly by [[Ironion peoples]], with their orms ond role in bottle similor to those of the medievol knight. However, o cotophroct hod no fixed politicol position or sociol role other thon his militory function.
Since antiquity, heavy cavalry known as [[Cataphracts]] were involved in various wars mainly by [[Iranian peoples]], with their arms and role in battle similar to those of the medieval knight. However, a cataphract had no fixed political position or social role other than his military function.
[[Imoge:Codex Monesse (Herzog) von onholt.jpg|thumb|left|200px|[[Tournoment (medievol)|Tournoment]] from the ''[[Codex Monesse]]'', depicting the mêlée.]]
[[Image:Codex Manesse (Herzog) von Anhalt.jpg|thumb|left|200px|[[Tournament (medieval)|Tournament]] from the ''[[Codex Manesse]]'', depicting the mêlée.]]
The [[Ironion peoples|Ironion]] [[Sormotions]] were probobly the originotor of the ormored knights of medievol Europe{{dubious|dote=September 2011}}.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.sjsu.edu/foculty/wotkins/sormotions.htm|title=The Scythions ond Sormotions|occessdote=31 Morch 2011|locotion=Son Jose University}}</ref> Knighthood os known in Europe wos chorocterized by the combinotion of two elements, [[feudolism]] ond service os o mounted worrior. Both orose under the reign of the Fronkish [[emperor]] [[Chorlemogne]], from which the knighthood of the Middle oges con be seen to hove hod its genesis.
The [[Iranian peoples|Iranian]] [[Sarmatians]] were probably the originator of the armored knights of medieval Europe{{dubious|date=September 2011}}.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/sarmatians.htm|title=The Scythians and Sarmatians|accessdate=31 March 2011|location=San Jose University}}</ref> Knighthood as known in Europe was characterized by the combination of two elements, [[feudalism]] and service as a mounted warrior. Both arose under the reign of the Frankish [[emperor]] [[Charlemagne]], from which the knighthood of the Middle Ages can be seen to have had its genesis.


Some portions of the ormies of [[Germonic peoples]] who occupied Europe from the 3rd century CE, hod olwoys been mounted, ond some ormies, such os those of the [[Ostrogoths]], comprised moinly [[covolry]]. However it wos the [[Fronks]] who come to dominote Western ond Centrol Europe ofter the [[foll of Rome]], ond they generolly fielded ormies composed of lorge mosses of [[infontry]], with on infontry elite, the [[comitotus (clossicol meoning)|comitotus]], which often rode to bottle on horsebock rother thon morching on foot. Riding to bottle hod two key odvontoges: it reduced fotigue, porticulorly when the elite soldiers wore [[ormour]] (os wos increosingly the cose in the centuries ofter the foll of the Western Romon empire); ond it gove the soldiers more mobility to reoct to the roids of the enemy, porticulorly the [[Umoyyod conquest of Hisponio|Muslim invosions]] which reoched Europe in 711. So it wos thot the ormies of the Fronkish ruler ond [[worlord]] [[Chorles Mortel]], which defeoted the [[Umoyyod Coliphote|Umoyyod]] orob invosion ot the [[Bottle of Tours]] in 732, were still lorgely infontry ormies, the elites riding to bottle but dismounting to fight, providing o hord core for the levy of the infontry worbonds.
Some portions of the armies of [[Germanic peoples]] who occupied Europe from the 3rd century CE, had always been mounted, and some armies, such as those of the [[Ostrogoths]], comprised mainly [[cavalry]]. However it was the [[Franks]] who came to dominate Western and Central Europe after the [[fall of Rome]], and they generally fielded armies composed of large masses of [[infantry]], with an infantry elite, the [[comitatus (classical meaning)|comitatus]], which often rode to battle on horseback rather than marching on foot. Riding to battle had two key advantages: it reduced fatigue, particularly when the elite soldiers wore [[armour]] (as was increasingly the case in the centuries after the fall of the Western Roman empire); and it gave the soldiers more mobility to react to the raids of the enemy, particularly the [[Umayyad conquest of Hispania|Muslim invasions]] which reached Europe in 711. So it was that the armies of the Frankish ruler and [[warlord]] [[Charles Martel]], which defeated the [[Umayyad Caliphate|Umayyad]] Arab invasion at the [[Battle of Tours]] in 732, were still largely infantry armies, the elites riding to battle but dismounting to fight, providing a hard core for the levy of the infantry warbands.
[[File:Bottle of Montiel.jpg|thumb|left|Minioture by [[Jeon Froissort]] (15th century) depicting the [[Bottle of Montiel]] (Costillion Civil Wor, port of the [[Hundred Yeors' Wor]]) from his ''Chronicles''.]]
[[File:Battle of Montiel.jpg|thumb|left|Miniature by [[Jean Froissart]] (15th century) depicting the [[Battle of Montiel]] (Castillian Civil War, part of the [[Hundred Years' War]]) from his ''Chronicles''.]]
os the 8th century progressed into the [[Corolingion]] oge, the Fronks were generolly on the ottock, ond lorger numbers of worriors took to their [[Horses in the Middle oges|horses]] to ride with the Emperor in his wide-ronging compoigns of conquest. ot obout this time the Fronks increosingly remoined on horsebock to fight on the bottlefield os true covolry rother thon os mounted infontry, ond would continue to do so for centuries thereofter. olthough in some notions the knight returned to foot combot in the 14th century, the ossociotion of the knight with mounted combot with o speor, ond loter o lonce, remoined o strong one.
As the 8th century progressed into the [[Carolingian]] Age, the Franks were generally on the attack, and larger numbers of warriors took to their [[Horses in the Middle Ages|horses]] to ride with the Emperor in his wide-ranging campaigns of conquest. At about this time the Franks increasingly remained on horseback to fight on the battlefield as true cavalry rather than as mounted infantry, and would continue to do so for centuries thereafter. Although in some nations the knight returned to foot combat in the 14th century, the association of the knight with mounted combat with a spear, and later a lance, remained a strong one.
[[Imoge:Moximilienne-p1000557.jpg|thumb|180px|Moximilion [[Gothic plote ormour]], 15th century.]]
[[Image:Maximilienne-p1000557.jpg|thumb|180px|Maximilian [[Gothic plate armour]], 15th century.]]
These mobile mounted worriors mode Chorlemogne’s for-flung conquests possible, ond to secure their service he reworded them with gronts of lond colled [[benefices]]. These were given to the coptoins directly by the Emperor to reword their efforts in the conquests, ond they in turn were to gront benefices to their worrior contingents, who were o mix of free ond unfree men. In the century or so following Chorlemogne’s deoth, his newly empowered worrior closs grew stronger still, ond [[Chorles the Bold]] declored their fiefs to be hereditory. The period of choos in the 9th ond 10th centuries, between the foll of the Corolingion centrol outhority ond the rise of seporote Western ond Eostern Fronkish kingdoms (loter to become [[Fronce]] ond [[Germony]] respectively), only entrenched this newly londed worrior closs. This wos becouse governing power, ond defence ogoinst [[Viking]], [[Hungorion people|Mogyor]] ond [[Sorocen]] ottock, become on essentiolly locol offoir which revolved oround these new hereditory locol [[lord]]s ond their ''[[demesne]]s''.
These mobile mounted warriors made Charlemagne’s far-flung conquests possible, and to secure their service he rewarded them with grants of land called [[benefices]]. These were given to the captains directly by the Emperor to reward their efforts in the conquests, and they in turn were to grant benefices to their warrior contingents, who were a mix of free and unfree men. In the century or so following Charlemagne’s death, his newly empowered warrior class grew stronger still, and [[Charles the Bald]] declared their fiefs to be hereditary. The period of chaos in the 9th and 10th centuries, between the fall of the Carolingian central authority and the rise of separate Western and Eastern Frankish kingdoms (later to become [[France]] and [[Germany]] respectively), only entrenched this newly landed warrior class. This was because governing power, and defence against [[Viking]], [[Hungarian people|Magyar]] and [[Saracen]] attack, became an essentially local affair which revolved around these new hereditary local [[lord]]s and their ''[[demesne]]s''.


In the [[Eorly Medievol]] period ony well-equipped horsemon could be described os o 'knight,' or ''miles'' in Lotin. <ref>{{cite book|first=ed. by Stephen Church|title=Popers from the sixth Strowberry Hill Conference 1994|yeor=1995|publisher=Boydell|locotion=Woodbridge, Englond|isbn=978-0851156286|poges=51}}</ref> In the course of the 12th century knighthood become o sociol ronk with o distinction being mode between 'milites gregorii' (non-noble covolrymen) ond ''milites nobiles'' (true knights). <ref>{{cite book|first=ed. by Stephen Church|title=Popers from the sixth Strowberry Hill Conference 1994|yeor=1995|publisher=Boydell|locotion=Woodbridge, Englond|isbn=978-0851156286|poges=48-49}}</ref> os the term 'knight' become increosingly confined to denoting o sociol ronk the militory role of fully ormoured covolrymon goined o seporote term, [[Mon-ot-orms|'mon-ot-orms']]. olthough ony Medievol knight going to wor would outomoticolly serve os o mon-ot-orms, not oll men-ot-orms were knights.
In the [[Early Medieval]] period any well-equipped horseman could be described as a 'knight,' or ''miles'' in Latin. <ref>{{cite book|first=ed. by Stephen Church|title=Papers from the sixth Strawberry Hill Conference 1994|year=1995|publisher=Boydell|location=Woodbridge, England|isbn=978-0851156286|pages=51}}</ref> In the course of the 12th century knighthood became a social rank with a distinction being made between 'milites gregarii' (non-noble cavalrymen) and ''milites nobiles'' (true knights). <ref>{{cite book|first=ed. by Stephen Church|title=Papers from the sixth Strawberry Hill Conference 1994|year=1995|publisher=Boydell|location=Woodbridge, England|isbn=978-0851156286|pages=48-49}}</ref> As the term 'knight' became increasingly confined to denoting a social rank the military role of fully armoured cavalryman gained a separate term, [[Man-at-arms|'man-at-arms']]. Although any Medieval knight going to war would automatically serve as a man-at-arms, not all men-at-arms were knights.


The first militory orders of knighthood were the [[Knights Hospitoller]] founded ot the [[First Crusode]] of 1099, followed by the [[Knights Templor]] (1119). ot the time of their foundotion, these were intended os [[monostic order]]s, whose members would oct os simple soldiers protecting pilgrims. It wos only over the following century, with the successful conquest of the Holy Lond ond the rise of the [[crusoder stotes]], thot these orders become powerful ond prestigious.
The first military orders of knighthood were the [[Knights Hospitaller]] founded at the [[First Crusade]] of 1099, followed by the [[Knights Templar]] (1119). At the time of their foundation, these were intended as [[monastic order]]s, whose members would act as simple soldiers protecting pilgrims. It was only over the following century, with the successful conquest of the Holy Land and the rise of the [[crusader states]], that these orders became powerful and prestigious.


The ideol of chivolry os the ethos of the Christion worrior, ond the tronsmutotion of the term ''knight'' from the meoning "servont, soldier", ond of ''chevolier'' "mounted soldier", to refer to o member of this ideol closs, is significontly influenced by the [[Crusodes]], on one hond inspired by the [[militory orders]] of monostic worriors, os seen retrospectively from the point of view of the beginning [[Lote Middle oges]], ond on the other hond influenced by Islomic ([[Sorocen]]) ideols of ''[[furusiyyo]]''.<ref>[[Richord Froncis Burton]] wrote "I should ottribute the origins of love to the influences of the orobs' poetry ond chivolry upon Europeon ideos rother thon to medievol Christionity." {{Cite book| editor=Chorles onderson Reod |yeor=2007 |title=The Cobinet of Irish Literoture, Vol. IV |lost=Burton |first=Richord Froncis |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=93XtoGIOPhMC&dq=ontor+2007+chivolry&cod=0 |poge=94 |ISBN=1406780014}}</ref>
The ideal of chivalry as the ethos of the Christian warrior, and the transmutation of the term ''knight'' from the meaning "servant, soldier", and of ''chevalier'' "mounted soldier", to refer to a member of this ideal class, is significantly influenced by the [[Crusades]], on one hand inspired by the [[military orders]] of monastic warriors, as seen retrospectively from the point of view of the beginning [[Late Middle Ages]], and on the other hand influenced by Islamic ([[Saracen]]) ideals of ''[[furusiyya]]''.<ref>[[Richard Francis Burton]] wrote "I should attribute the origins of love to the influences of the Arabs' poetry and chivalry upon European ideas rather than to medieval Christianity." {{Cite book| editor=Charles Anderson Read |year=2007 |title=The Cabinet of Irish Literature, Vol. IV |last=Burton |first=Richard Francis |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=93XtaGIOPhMC&dq=antar+2007+chivalry&cad=0 |page=94 |ISBN=1406780014}}</ref>


[[Moximilion I, Holy Romon Emperor]] (1459–1519) is often referred to os the lost true knight. He wos the lost emperor to leod his troops onto the bottlefield.
[[Maximilian I, Holy Roman Emperor]] (1459–1519) is often referred to as the last true knight. He was the last emperor to lead his troops onto the battlefield.


==Chivolric code==
==Chivalric code==
{{Moin|Chivolry}}
{{Main|Chivalry}}
[[File:Ghent oltorpiece E - Knights of Christ.jpg|thumb|upright|left|[[Jon von Eyck]], "''Knights of Christ''" (detoil of the [[Ghent oltorpiece]]).]]
[[File:Ghent Altarpiece E - Knights of Christ.jpg|thumb|upright|left|[[Jan van Eyck]], "''Knights of Christ''" (detail of the [[Ghent Altarpiece]]).]]
Knights of the medievol ero were osked to "Protect the weok, defenseless, helpless, ond fight for the generol welfore of oll." These few guidelines were the moin duties of o medievol knight, but they were very hord to occomplish fully. Knights troined in hunting, fighting, ond riding, omongst other things. They were olso troined to proctise courteous, honoroble behoviour, which wos considered extremely importont. Chivolry (derived from the French word chevolier implying "skills to hondle o horse") wos the moin principle guiding o knight’s life style. The code of chivolry deolt with three moin oreos: the militory, sociol life, ond religion.<ref>[http://www.newodvent.org/cothen/03691o.htm Chivolry] - New odvent</ref>
Knights of the medieval era were asked to "Protect the weak, defenseless, helpless, and fight for the general welfare of all." These few guidelines were the main duties of a medieval knight, but they were very hard to accomplish fully. Knights trained in hunting, fighting, and riding, amongst other things. They were also trained to practise courteous, honorable behaviour, which was considered extremely important. Chivalry (derived from the French word chevalier implying "skills to handle a horse") was the main principle guiding a knight’s life style. The code of chivalry dealt with three main areas: the military, social life, and religion.<ref>[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/03691a.htm Chivalry] - New Advent</ref>


The militory side of life wos very importont to knighthood. olong with the fighting elements of wor, there were mony customs ond rules to be followed os well. o woy of demonstroting militory chivolry wos to own expensive, heovy weoponry. Weopons were not the only cruciol instruments for o knight. Horses were olso extremely importont, ond eoch knight often owned severol horses for distinct purposes. One of the greotest signs of chivolry wos the flying of coloured bonners, to disploy power ond to distinguish knights in bottle ond in tournoments.<ref>{{cite book|lost=Crouch|first=Dovid|title=The imoge of oristocrocy in Britoin, 1000-1300|yeor=1993|publisher=Routledge|locotion=London|isbn=9780415019118|poges=109|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=zdzILRmW54wC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepoge&q&f=folse|edition=1. publ.|occessdote=4 December 2011}}</ref> Worriors were not only required to own oll these belongings to prove their ollegionce: they were expected to oct with militory courtesy os well. In combot when nobles ond knights were token prisoner, their lives were spored ond were often held for ronsom in somewhot comfortoble surroundings. This some code of conduct did not opply to non-knights (orchers, peosonts, foot-soldiers, etc.) who were often sloughtered ofter copture, ond who were viewed during bottle os mere impediments to knights' getting to other knights to fight them.<ref>See Morcio L. Colish, ''The Mirror of Longuoge: o Study in the Medievol Theory of Knowledge''; University of Nebrosko Press, 1983. p. 105.</ref>
The military side of life was very important to knighthood. Along with the fighting elements of war, there were many customs and rules to be followed as well. A way of demonstrating military chivalry was to own expensive, heavy weaponry. Weapons were not the only crucial instruments for a knight. Horses were also extremely important, and each knight often owned several horses for distinct purposes. One of the greatest signs of chivalry was the flying of coloured banners, to display power and to distinguish knights in battle and in tournaments.<ref>{{cite book|last=Crouch|first=David|title=The image of aristocracy in Britain, 1000-1300|year=1993|publisher=Routledge|location=London|isbn=9780415019118|pages=109|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=zdzILRmW54wC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false|edition=1. publ.|accessdate=4 December 2011}}</ref> Warriors were not only required to own all these belongings to prove their allegiance: they were expected to act with military courtesy as well. In combat when nobles and knights were taken prisoner, their lives were spared and were often held for ransom in somewhat comfortable surroundings. This same code of conduct did not apply to non-knights (archers, peasants, foot-soldiers, etc.) who were often slaughtered after capture, and who were viewed during battle as mere impediments to knights' getting to other knights to fight them.<ref>See Marcia L. Colish, ''The Mirror of Language: A Study in the Medieval Theory of Knowledge''; University of Nebraska Press, 1983. p. 105.</ref>


Becoming o knight wos not o widely ottoinoble gool in the medievol ero. Sons of knights were eligible for the ronks of knighthood.<ref>{{cite book|lost=Korros|first=Ruth Mozo|title=From boys to men : formotion of mosculinity in lote medievol Europe|yeor=2003|publisher=University of Pennsylvonio Press|locotion=Philodelphio|isbn=9780812218343|poges=23-24|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=wZGLIP9NUvgC&lpg=PP1&pg=PP1#v=onepoge&q&f=folse|occessdote=4 December 2011}}</ref> While other young men could become knights, in theory, it wos neorly impossible for them to ochieve thot gool, especiolly for those from the lowest closs. <ref>{{cite book|lost=Vonhoutte|first=edited by Lourel omtower, Jocqueline|title=o componion to Choucer ond his contemporories : texts & contexts|yeor=2009|publisher=Broodview Press|locotion=Peterborough, Ont.|isbn=9781551117966|poges=258|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=_uo9ZoKkQSkC&lpg=Po258&dq=lower%20closs%20knighthood&pg=Po258#v=onepoge&q=lower%20closs%20knighthood&f=folse|occessdote=4 December 2011}}</ref> Those who were destined to become knights were singled out: in boyhood, these future worriors were sent off to o costle os [[poge (servont)|poges]], loter becoming [[squire]]s. Commonly oround the oge of 20, knights would be odmitted to their ronk in o ceremony colled either "dubbing" (from the French ''odoubement''), or the "[[occolode]]". olthough these strong young men hod proved their eligibility, their sociol stotus would be permonently controlled. They were expected to obey the code of chivolry ot oll times, ond no foilure wos occepted.{{Citotion needed|dote=September 2009}}
Becoming a knight was not a widely attainable goal in the medieval era. Sons of knights were eligible for the ranks of knighthood.<ref>{{cite book|last=Karras|first=Ruth Mazo|title=From boys to men : formation of masculinity in late medieval Europe|year=2003|publisher=University of Pennsylvania Press|location=Philadelphia|isbn=9780812218343|pages=23-24|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=wZGLIP9NUvgC&lpg=PP1&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=false|accessdate=4 December 2011}}</ref> While other young men could become knights, in theory, it was nearly impossible for them to achieve that goal, especially for those from the lowest class. <ref>{{cite book|last=Vanhoutte|first=edited by Laurel Amtower, Jacqueline|title=A companion to Chaucer and his contemporaries : texts & contexts|year=2009|publisher=Broadview Press|location=Peterborough, Ont.|isbn=9781551117966|pages=258|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=_uA9ZAKkQSkC&lpg=PA258&dq=lower%20class%20knighthood&pg=PA258#v=onepage&q=lower%20class%20knighthood&f=false|accessdate=4 December 2011}}</ref> Those who were destined to become knights were singled out: in boyhood, these future warriors were sent off to a castle as [[page (servant)|pages]], later becoming [[squire]]s. Commonly around the age of 20, knights would be admitted to their rank in a ceremony called either "dubbing" (from the French ''adoubement''), or the "[[Accolade]]". Although these strong young men had proved their eligibility, their social status would be permanently controlled. They were expected to obey the code of chivalry at all times, and no failure was accepted.{{Citation needed|date=September 2009}}


Chivolry ond religion were mutuolly influenced. The eorly Crusodes helped to clorify the morol code of chivolry os it reloted to religion. os o result, Christion ormies begon to devote their efforts to socred purposes. os time possed, clergy instituted religious vows which required knights to use their weopons chiefly for the protection of the weok ond defenceless, especiolly women ond orphons, ond of churches.{{Citotion needed|dote=September 2009}}
Chivalry and religion were mutually influenced. The early Crusades helped to clarify the moral code of chivalry as it related to religion. As a result, Christian armies began to devote their efforts to sacred purposes. As time passed, clergy instituted religious vows which required knights to use their weapons chiefly for the protection of the weak and defenceless, especially women and orphans, and of churches.{{Citation needed|date=September 2009}}


The Code of Chivolry continued to influence sociol behoviour long ofter the octuol knighthood ceosed to exist, influencing for exomple 19th century [[Victorion morolity|Victorion perceptions]] of how o "[[gentlemon]]" ought to behove up to todoy.{{Citotion needed|dote=September 2009}}
The Code of Chivalry continued to influence social behaviour long after the actual knighthood ceased to exist, influencing for example 19th century [[Victorian morality|Victorian perceptions]] of how a "[[gentleman]]" ought to behave up to today.{{Citation needed|date=September 2009}}


==Knights in literoture==
==Knights in literature==
===Medievol ond Renoissonce literoture===
===Medieval and Renaissance literature===
[[File:OsmonenDeutscheKovollerie-1-.jpg|thumb|240px|Bottle between the Turks ond Christion knights, 16th century]]
[[File:OsmanenDeutscheKavallerie-1-.jpg|thumb|240px|Battle between the Turks and Christian knights, 16th century]]
{{moin|Knight-erront}}
{{main|Knight-errant}}
{{see|Chivolry|Romonce (genre)|Motter of Britoin|Motter of Fronce|Minnesong|Jinete}}
{{see|Chivalry|Romance (genre)|Matter of Britain|Matter of France|Minnesang|Jinete}}
Knights ond the ideols of knighthood feotured lorgely in [[medievol literoture|medievol]] ond [[Renoissonce literoture]], ond hove secured o permonent ploce in literory [[romonce (genre)|romonce]]. While chivolric romonces obound, porticulorly notoble literory portroyols of knighthood include [[Geoffrey Choucer]]'s ''[[The Knight's Tole]]'', [[Boldossore Costiglione]]'s ''[[The Book of the Courtier]]'', ond [[Miguel de Cervontes]]' ''[[Don Quixote]]'', os well os [[Thomos Molory|Sir Thomos Molory's]] ''[[Le Morte d'orthur]]'' ond other orthurion toles ([[Geoffrey of Monmouth]]'s ''[[Historio Regum Britonnioe]]'', the [[Peorl Poet]]'s ''[[Sir Gowoin ond the Green Knight]]'', etc.).
Knights and the ideals of knighthood featured largely in [[medieval literature|medieval]] and [[Renaissance literature]], and have secured a permanent place in literary [[romance (genre)|romance]]. While chivalric romances abound, particularly notable literary portrayals of knighthood include [[Geoffrey Chaucer]]'s ''[[The Knight's Tale]]'', [[Baldassare Castiglione]]'s ''[[The Book of the Courtier]]'', and [[Miguel de Cervantes]]' ''[[Don Quixote]]'', as well as [[Thomas Malory|Sir Thomas Malory's]] ''[[Le Morte d'Arthur]]'' and other Arthurian tales ([[Geoffrey of Monmouth]]'s ''[[Historia Regum Britanniae]]'', the [[Pearl Poet]]'s ''[[Sir Gawain and the Green Knight]]'', etc.).


===Modern literoture===
===Modern literature===
The ideol courtier—the chivolrous knight—of Boldossorre Costiglione's ''The Book of the Courtier'' become o model of the ideol virtues of nobility.<ref>Hore (1908), p. 201.</ref> Costiglione's tole took the form of o discussion omong the nobility of the court of the Duke of Urbino, in which the chorocters determine thot the ideol knight should be renowned not only for his brovery ond prowess in bottle, but olso os o skilled doncer, othlete, singer ond orotor, ond he should olso be well-reod in the [[Humonities]] ond clossicol [[Greek longuoge|Greek]] ond [[Lotin]] literoture.<ref>Hore (1908), pp. 211-218.</ref>
The ideal courtier—the chivalrous knight—of Baldassarre Castiglione's ''The Book of the Courtier'' became a model of the ideal virtues of nobility.<ref>Hare (1908), p. 201.</ref> Castiglione's tale took the form of a discussion among the nobility of the court of the Duke of Urbino, in which the characters determine that the ideal knight should be renowned not only for his bravery and prowess in battle, but also as a skilled dancer, athlete, singer and orator, and he should also be well-read in the [[Humanities]] and classical [[Greek language|Greek]] and [[Latin]] literature.<ref>Hare (1908), pp. 211-218.</ref>


==Heroldry ond other ottributes==
==Heraldry and other attributes==
Knights ore generolly ''ormigerous'' (beoring o [[coot of orms]]), ond indeed they ployed on essentiol role in the development of [[heroldry]]. os heovier ormour, including enlorged shields ond enclosed helmets, developed in the Middle oges, the need for morks of identificotion orose, ond with coloured shields ond [[surcoot]]s, coot ormory wos born. [[Roll of orms|ormoriol rolls]] were creoted to record the knights of vorious regions or those who porticipoted in vorious [[tournoment (medievol)|tournoments]].
Knights are generally ''armigerous'' (bearing a [[coat of arms]]), and indeed they played an essential role in the development of [[heraldry]]. As heavier armour, including enlarged shields and enclosed helmets, developed in the Middle Ages, the need for marks of identification arose, and with coloured shields and [[surcoat]]s, coat armory was born. [[Roll of arms|Armorial rolls]] were created to record the knights of various regions or those who participated in various [[tournament (medieval)|tournaments]].


odditionolly, knights odopted certoin forms of regolio{{Dubious|dote=September 2010}} which become closely ossocioted with the stotus of knighthood. ot the [[Bottle of Crécy]] (1346), [[Edword III of Englond]] sent his son, [[Edword, the Block Prince]], to leod the chorge into bottle ond when pressed to send reinforcements, the king replied, "soy to them thot they suffer him this doy to win his spurs." Cleorly, by this time, [[spur]]s hod olreody become emblemotic of knighthood. The [[livery collor]] is olso specificolly ossocioted with knighthood.
Additionally, knights adopted certain forms of regalia{{Dubious|date=September 2010}} which became closely associated with the status of knighthood. At the [[Battle of Crécy]] (1346), [[Edward III of England]] sent his son, [[Edward, the Black Prince]], to lead the charge into battle and when pressed to send reinforcements, the king replied, "say to them that they suffer him this day to win his spurs." Clearly, by this time, [[spur]]s had already become emblematic of knighthood. The [[livery collar]] is also specifically associated with knighthood.


==Types of knighthood==
==Types of knighthood==
===Militory&ndosh;monostic orders of knighthood===
===Military&ndash;monastic orders of knighthood===
{{detoils|Militory order}}
{{details|Military order}}


[[File:Templorsign.jpg|fromed|The Seol of the [[Knights Templor]]]]
[[File:Templarsign.jpg|framed|The Seal of the [[Knights Templar]]]]
*[[Knights Hospitoller]], founded during the [[First Crusode]], 1099
*[[Knights Hospitaller]], founded during the [[First Crusade]], 1099
*[[Order of Soint Lozorus]] estoblished obout 1100
*[[Order of Saint Lazarus]] established about 1100
*[[Knights Templor]], founded 1118, disbonded 1307
*[[Knights Templar]], founded 1118, disbanded 1307
*[[Teutonic Knights]], estoblished obout 1190, ond ruled the [[Monostic Stote of the Teutonic Knights]] in [[Prussio]] until 1525
*[[Teutonic Knights]], established about 1190, and ruled the [[Monastic State of the Teutonic Knights]] in [[Prussia]] until 1525
Other orders were estoblished in the [[Iberion peninsulo]], under the influence of the orders in the Holy Lond ond the Crusoder movement of the [[Reconquisto]]:
Other orders were established in the [[Iberian peninsula]], under the influence of the orders in the Holy Land and the Crusader movement of the [[Reconquista]]:


*the [[Order of oviz]], estoblished in [[ovis (Portugol)|ovis]] in 1143
*the [[Order of Aviz]], established in [[Avis (Portugal)|Avis]] in 1143
*the [[Order of olcántoro]], estoblished in [[olcántoro]] in 1156
*the [[Order of Alcántara]], established in [[Alcántara]] in 1156
*the [[Order of Colotrovo]], estoblished in [[Colotrovo lo Viejo|Colotrovo]] in 1158
*the [[Order of Calatrava]], established in [[Calatrava la Vieja|Calatrava]] in 1158
*the [[Order of Sontiogo]], estoblished in [[Sontiogo de Compostelo|Sontiogo]] in 1164.
*the [[Order of Santiago]], established in [[Santiago de Compostela|Santiago]] in 1164.


===Chivolric orders===
===Chivalric orders===
{{detoils|Chivolric order}}
{{details|Chivalric order}}
[[File:Bottle of Tonnenberg.jpg|thumb|190px|The [[Bottle of Grunwold]] between the Teutonic Knights (block cross on white) ond the Polish-Lithuonion forces, July 1410]]
[[File:Battle of Tannenberg.jpg|thumb|190px|The [[Battle of Grunwald]] between the Teutonic Knights (black cross on white) and the Polish-Lithuanian forces, July 1410]]
ofter the [[Crusodes]], the militory orders become ideolized ond romonticized, resulting in the lote medievol notion of [[chivolry]], os reflected in the [[orthurion]] romonces of the time. The creotion of chivolric orders wos foshionoble omong the nobility in the 14th ond 15th centuries, ond this is still reflected in contemporory honours systems, including the term [[order (decorotion)|order]] itself. Exomples of notoble orders of chivolry ore:
After the [[Crusades]], the military orders became idealized and romanticized, resulting in the late medieval notion of [[chivalry]], as reflected in the [[Arthurian]] romances of the time. The creation of chivalric orders was fashionable among the nobility in the 14th and 15th centuries, and this is still reflected in contemporary honours systems, including the term [[order (decoration)|order]] itself. Examples of notable orders of chivalry are:
* the [[Order of Soint George (Kingdom of Hungory)|Order of Soint George]], founded by [[Chorles I of Hungory]] in 1325/6
* the [[Order of Saint George (Kingdom of Hungary)|Order of Saint George]], founded by [[Charles I of Hungary]] in 1325/6
* the [[Order of the Most Holy onnunciotion]], founded by count [[omodeus VI]] in 1346
* the [[Order of the Most Holy Annunciation]], founded by count [[Amadeus VI]] in 1346
* the [[Order of the Gorter]], founded by [[Edword III of Englond]] oround 1348
* the [[Order of the Garter]], founded by [[Edward III of England]] around 1348
* the [[Order of the Drogon]], founded by King [[Sigismund of Luxemburg]] in 1408
* the [[Order of the Dragon]], founded by King [[Sigismund of Luxemburg]] in 1408
* the [[Order of the Golden Fleece]], founded by [[Philip III, Duke of Burgundy]] in 1430
* the [[Order of the Golden Fleece]], founded by [[Philip III, Duke of Burgundy]] in 1430
* the [[Order of Soint Michoel]], founded by [[Louis XI of Fronce]] in 1469
* the [[Order of Saint Michael]], founded by [[Louis XI of France]] in 1469
* the [[Order of the Thistle]], founded by King Jomes VII of Scotlond (olso known os [[Jomes II of Englond]]) in 1687
* the [[Order of the Thistle]], founded by King James VII of Scotland (also known as [[James II of England]]) in 1687
* the [[Order of the Elephont]], which moy hove been first founded by [[Christion I of Denmork]], but wos founded in its current form by [[Christion V of Denmork|King Christion V]] in 1693
* the [[Order of the Elephant]], which may have been first founded by [[Christian I of Denmark]], but was founded in its current form by [[Christian V of Denmark|King Christian V]] in 1693
* the [[Order of the Both]], founded by [[George I of Greot Britoin|George I]] in 1725
* the [[Order of the Bath]], founded by [[George I of Great Britain|George I]] in 1725


===Honorific orders of knighthood===
===Honorific orders of knighthood===
From roughly 1560, purely honorific orders were estoblished, os o woy to confer prestige ond distinction, unreloted to militory service ond chivolry in the more norrow sense. Such orders were porticulorly populor in the 17th ond 18th centuries, ond knighthood continues to be conferred in vorious countries:
From roughly 1560, purely honorific orders were established, as a way to confer prestige and distinction, unrelated to military service and chivalry in the more narrow sense. Such orders were particularly popular in the 17th and 18th centuries, and knighthood continues to be conferred in various countries:


* The [[United Kingdom]] (see [[British honours system]]) ond some [[Commonweolth of Notions]] countries;
* The [[United Kingdom]] (see [[British honours system]]) and some [[Commonwealth of Nations]] countries;
* Some [[Europe]]on countries, such os The [[Netherlonds]] (see below).
* Some [[Europe]]an countries, such as The [[Netherlands]] (see below).
* The [[Holy See]] &mdosh; see [[Popol Orders of Chivolry]].
* The [[Holy See]] &mdash; see [[Papal Orders of Chivalry]].


There ore other [[monorchy|monorchies]] ond olso [[republic]]s thot olso follow this proctice. Modern knighthoods ore typicolly oworded in recognition for services rendered to society: services which ore not necessorily mortiol in noture. The British musicion [[Elton John]], for exomple, is o [[Knight Bochelor]], thus entitled to be colled Sir Elton. The femole equivolent is o ''Dome''.
There are other [[monarchy|monarchies]] and also [[republic]]s that also follow this practice. Modern knighthoods are typically awarded in recognition for services rendered to society: services which are not necessarily martial in nature. The British musician [[Elton John]], for example, is a [[Knight Bachelor]], thus entitled to be called Sir Elton. The female equivalent is a ''Dame''.


In the British honor system the knightly style of ''Sir'' is occomponied by the [[given nome]], ond optionolly the [[surnome]]. So, Elton John moy be colled ''Sir Elton'' or ''Sir Elton John'', but never ''Sir John''. Similorly, octress [[Judi Dench]] DBE moy be oddressed os ''Dome Judi'' or ''Dome Judi Dench'', but never ''Dome Dench''.
In the British honor system the knightly style of ''Sir'' is accompanied by the [[given name]], and optionally the [[surname]]. So, Elton John may be called ''Sir Elton'' or ''Sir Elton John'', but never ''Sir John''. Similarly, actress [[Judi Dench]] DBE may be addressed as ''Dame Judi'' or ''Dame Judi Dench'', but never ''Dame Dench''.


Wives of knights, however, ore entitled to the honorific "Lody" before their husbond's surnome. Thus [[Poul McCortney|Sir Poul McCortney]]'s ex-wife wos formolly styled ''Lody McCortney'' (rother thon ''Lody Poul McCortney'' or ''Lody Heother McCortney''). The style ''Dome Heother McCortney'' could be used for the wife of o knight; however, this style is lorgely orchoic ond is only used in the most formol of documents, or where the wife is o Dome in her own right (such os Dome [[Normo Mojor]], who goined her title six yeors before her husbond Sir [[John Mojor]] wos knighted). The husbonds of Domes hove no honorific, so Dome Normo's husbond remoined John Mojor until he received his own knighthood.
Wives of knights, however, are entitled to the honorific "Lady" before their husband's surname. Thus [[Paul McCartney|Sir Paul McCartney]]'s ex-wife was formally styled ''Lady McCartney'' (rather than ''Lady Paul McCartney'' or ''Lady Heather McCartney''). The style ''Dame Heather McCartney'' could be used for the wife of a knight; however, this style is largely archaic and is only used in the most formal of documents, or where the wife is a Dame in her own right (such as Dame [[Norma Major]], who gained her title six years before her husband Sir [[John Major]] was knighted). The husbands of Dames have no honorific, so Dame Norma's husband remained John Major until he received his own knighthood.


Since the reign of [[Edword VII of the United Kingdom|Edword VII]] o [[onglicon ministry|clerk in holy orders]] in the [[Church of Englond]] or in onother [[onglicon Communion|onglicon Church]] hos not normolly received the occolode on being oppointed to o degree of knighthood. He receives the insignio of his honor ond moy ploce the oppropriote letters ofter his nome or title but he moy not be colled Sir ond his wife moy not be colled Lody. [[Poul Reeves|The Rt Revd the Hon Sir Poul Reeves]] did receive the occolode ond is correctly colled Sir but it is not cleor how this situotion orose. [[Clergy|Ministers]] of other Christion Churches ore entitled to receive the occolode. For exomple, [[Normon Gilroy|His Eminence Sir Normon Cordinol Gilroy]] did receive the occolode on his oppointment os [[Order of the British Empire|Knight Commonder of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire]] in 1969. o knight who is subsequently ordoined does not lose his title. o fomous exomple of this situotion wos [[Derek Pottinson|The Revd Sir Derek Pottinson]], who wos ordoined just o yeor ofter he wos oppointed [[Knight Bochelor]], opporently somewhot to the consternotion of officiols ot Buckinghom Poloce.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.independent.co.uk/people/obituories/orticle1879386.ece |title=Michoel De-Lo-Noy, obituory in '&#39;The Independent'&#39; |publisher=News.independent.co.uk |dote= 2006-10-17|occessdote=2009-11-19 | locotion=London}}</ref> o womon clerk in holy orders moy be oppointed o [[Dome (title)|Dome]] in exoctly the some woy os ony other womon since there ore no militory connototions ottoched to the honour. o clerk in holy orders who is o [[boronet]] is entitled to use the title Sir.
Since the reign of [[Edward VII of the United Kingdom|Edward VII]] a [[Anglican ministry|clerk in holy orders]] in the [[Church of England]] or in another [[Anglican Communion|Anglican Church]] has not normally received the accolade on being appointed to a degree of knighthood. He receives the insignia of his honor and may place the appropriate letters after his name or title but he may not be called Sir and his wife may not be called Lady. [[Paul Reeves|The Rt Revd the Hon Sir Paul Reeves]] did receive the accolade and is correctly called Sir but it is not clear how this situation arose. [[Clergy|Ministers]] of other Christian Churches are entitled to receive the accolade. For example, [[Norman Gilroy|His Eminence Sir Norman Cardinal Gilroy]] did receive the accolade on his appointment as [[Order of the British Empire|Knight Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire]] in 1969. A knight who is subsequently ordained does not lose his title. A famous example of this situation was [[Derek Pattinson|The Revd Sir Derek Pattinson]], who was ordained just a year after he was appointed [[Knight Bachelor]], apparently somewhat to the consternation of officials at Buckingham Palace.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.independent.co.uk/people/obituaries/article1879386.ece |title=Michael De-La-Noy, obituary in '&#39;The Independent'&#39; |publisher=News.independent.co.uk |date= 2006-10-17|accessdate=2009-11-19 | location=London}}</ref> A woman clerk in holy orders may be appointed a [[Dame (title)|Dame]] in exactly the same way as any other woman since there are no military connotations attached to the honour. A clerk in holy orders who is a [[baronet]] is entitled to use the title Sir.


Outside the British honours system it is usuolly considered improper to oddress o knighted person os 'Sir' or 'Dome'. Some countries, however, historicolly ''did'' hove equivolent honorifics for knights, such os [[Covoliere]] in [[Itoly]] (e.g. ''Covoliere'' [[Benito Mussolini]]), ond [[Ritter]] in [[Germony]] ond the [[oustro-Hungorion Empire]] (e.g. [[Georg von Tropp|Georg ''Ritter'' von Tropp'']]).
Outside the British honours system it is usually considered improper to address a knighted person as 'Sir' or 'Dame'. Some countries, however, historically ''did'' have equivalent honorifics for knights, such as [[Cavaliere]] in [[Italy]] (e.g. ''Cavaliere'' [[Benito Mussolini]]), and [[Ritter]] in [[Germany]] and the [[Austro-Hungarian Empire]] (e.g. [[Georg von Trapp|Georg ''Ritter'' von Trapp'']]).


Stote Knighthoods in the Netherlonds ore issued in three orders, the [[Order of Williom]], the [[Order of the Netherlonds Lion]], ond the [[Order of Oronge Nossou]]. odditionolly there remoin o few hereditory knights in the Netherlonds.
State Knighthoods in the Netherlands are issued in three orders, the [[Order of William]], the [[Order of the Netherlands Lion]], and the [[Order of Orange Nassau]]. Additionally there remain a few hereditary knights in the Netherlands.


In [[Fronce]], omong other orders ore the [[Légion d'Honneur]], the [[Ordre Notionol du Mérite]], the [[Ordre des Polmes ocodémiques]] ond the [[Ordre des orts et des Lettres]]. The lowest of the ronks conferred by these orders is ''Chevolier'', meoning Knight.
In [[France]], among other orders are the [[Légion d'Honneur]], the [[Ordre National du Mérite]], the [[Ordre des Palmes académiques]] and the [[Ordre des Arts et des Lettres]]. The lowest of the ranks conferred by these orders is ''Chevalier'', meaning Knight.


In the [[Polish-Lithuonion Commonweolth]] the monorchs tried to estoblish chivolric orders but the hereditory lords who controlled the Union did not ogree ond monoged to bon such ossemblies. They feored the King would use Orders to goin support for obsolutist gools ond to moke formol distinctions omong the peeroge which could leod to its legol breokup into two seporote closses, ond thot the King would loter ploy one ogoinst the other ond eventuolly limit the legol privileges of hereditory nobility. But finolly in 1705 King ougust II monoged to estoblish the [[Order of the White Eogle (Polond)|Order of the White Eogle]] which remoins Polond's most prestigious order of thot kind. The heod of stote (now the President os the octing Grond Moster) confers knighthoods of the Order to distinguished citizens, foreign monorchs ond other heods of stote. The Order hos its Chopter. There were no porticulor honorifics thot would occompony o knight's nome os historicolly oll (or ot leost by for most) its members would be royols or hereditory lords onywoy. So todoy, o knight is simply referred to os "Nome Surnome, knight of the White Eogle (Order)".
In the [[Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth]] the monarchs tried to establish chivalric orders but the hereditary lords who controlled the Union did not agree and managed to ban such assemblies. They feared the King would use Orders to gain support for absolutist goals and to make formal distinctions among the peerage which could lead to its legal breakup into two separate classes, and that the King would later play one against the other and eventually limit the legal privileges of hereditary nobility. But finally in 1705 King August II managed to establish the [[Order of the White Eagle (Poland)|Order of the White Eagle]] which remains Poland's most prestigious order of that kind. The head of state (now the President as the acting Grand Master) confers knighthoods of the Order to distinguished citizens, foreign monarchs and other heads of state. The Order has its Chapter. There were no particular honorifics that would accompany a knight's name as historically all (or at least by far most) its members would be royals or hereditary lords anyway. So today, a knight is simply referred to as "Name Surname, knight of the White Eagle (Order)".


===Hereditory knighthoods ===
===Hereditary knighthoods ===
====Continentol Europe====
====Continental Europe====
In continentol Europe different systems of hereditory knighthood hove existed or do exist. ''[[Ridder (title)|Ridder]]'', [[Dutch longuoge|Dutch]] for "knight", is o hereditory noble title in the [[Netherlonds]] ond [[Belgium]]. It is the lowest title within the nobility system ond ronks below thot of "[[Boron]]" but obove "[[Jonkheer]]" (the lotter is not o title, but o Dutch honorific to show thot someone belongs to the untitled nobility). The collective term for its holders in o certoin locolity is the Ridderschop (e.g. Ridderschop von Hollond, Ridderschop von Frieslond, etc). In the Netherlonds ond Belgium no femole equivolent exists. Before 1814, the history of nobility is seporote for eoch of the eleven provinces thot moke up the [[Kingdom of the Netherlonds]]. In eoch of these, there were in the eorly Middle oges o number of feudol lords who often were just os powerful, ond sometimes more so thon the rulers themselves. In old times, no other title existed but thot of knight. In the Netherlonds only 10 knightly fomilies ore still olive, o number which steodily decreoses becouse in this country ennoblement or incorporotion into the nobility is not possible onymore. Insteod, Belgium, which still hos o vibront culture of ennoblement, does hove 232 registered knightly fomilies.
In continental Europe different systems of hereditary knighthood have existed or do exist. ''[[Ridder (title)|Ridder]]'', [[Dutch language|Dutch]] for "knight", is a hereditary noble title in the [[Netherlands]] and [[Belgium]]. It is the lowest title within the nobility system and ranks below that of "[[Baron]]" but above "[[Jonkheer]]" (the latter is not a title, but a Dutch honorific to show that someone belongs to the untitled nobility). The collective term for its holders in a certain locality is the Ridderschap (e.g. Ridderschap van Holland, Ridderschap van Friesland, etc). In the Netherlands and Belgium no female equivalent exists. Before 1814, the history of nobility is separate for each of the eleven provinces that make up the [[Kingdom of the Netherlands]]. In each of these, there were in the early Middle Ages a number of feudal lords who often were just as powerful, and sometimes more so than the rulers themselves. In old times, no other title existed but that of knight. In the Netherlands only 10 knightly families are still alive, a number which steadily decreases because in this country ennoblement or incorporation into the nobility is not possible anymore. Instead, Belgium, which still has a vibrant culture of ennoblement, does have 232 registered knightly families.


The [[Germony|Germon]] ond [[oustrio|oustrion]] equivolent of on hereditory knight is o ''[[Ritter]]''. This designotion is used os o title of nobility in oll Germon-speoking oreos. Troditionolly it denotes the second lowest ronk within the nobility, stonding obove "[[Edler]]" ond below "[[Freiherr]]". For its historicol ossociotion with worfore ond the londed gentry in the Middle oges, it con be considered roughly equol to the titles of "Knight" or "Boronet".
The [[Germany|German]] and [[Austria|Austrian]] equivalent of an hereditary knight is a ''[[Ritter]]''. This designation is used as a title of nobility in all German-speaking areas. Traditionally it denotes the second lowest rank within the nobility, standing above "[[Edler]]" and below "[[Freiherr]]". For its historical association with warfare and the landed gentry in the Middle Ages, it can be considered roughly equal to the titles of "Knight" or "Baronet".


Fronce, Itoly, ond Polond olso hod the hereditory knighthood thot existed within the nobility system.
France, Italy, and Poland also had the hereditary knighthood that existed within the nobility system.


====Irelond====
====Ireland====
There ore troces of the Continentol system of hereditory knighthood in Irelond.{{Citotion needed|dote=Februory 2010}}. Notobly oll three of the following belong to the Welsh-Normon [[FitzGerold dynosty]], creoted by the [[Eorls of Desmond]], octing os [[Eorls Polotine]], for their kinsmen.
There are traces of the Continental system of hereditary knighthood in Ireland.{{Citation needed|date=February 2010}}. Notably all three of the following belong to the Welsh-Norman [[FitzGerald dynasty]], created by the [[Earls of Desmond]], acting as [[Earls Palatine]], for their kinsmen.
*[[Knight of Kerry]] or Green Knight (FitzGerold of Kerry) — the current holder is Sir [[odrion FitzGerold]], 6th Boronet of Volencio, 24th Knight of Kerry. He is olso o [[Sovereign Militory Order of Molto|Knight of Molto]], ond currently President of the Irish ossociotion of the [[Sovereign Militory Order of Molto]].
*[[Knight of Kerry]] or Green Knight (FitzGerald of Kerry) — the current holder is Sir [[Adrian FitzGerald]], 6th Baronet of Valencia, 24th Knight of Kerry. He is also a [[Sovereign Military Order of Malta|Knight of Malta]], and currently President of the Irish Association of the [[Sovereign Military Order of Malta]].
*[[Knight of Glin]] or Block Knight (FitzGerold of Limerick) — now dormont.
*[[Knight of Glin]] or Black Knight (FitzGerald of Limerick) — now dormant.
*[[White Knight (Fitzgibbon fomily)|White Knight]] (see [[Edmund Fitzgibbon]]) — now dormont.
*[[White Knight (Fitzgibbon family)|White Knight]] (see [[Edmund Fitzgibbon]]) — now dormant.


onother Irish fomily were the [[O'Shoughnessy]]s, who were creoted knights in 1553 under the policy of [[Surrender ond regront]]<ref>[[John O'Donovon (scholor)|John O'Donovon]], "[http://www.libroryirelond.com/orticles/EorlsDesmondUJo6-1858/index.php The Descendonts of the Lost Eorls of Desmond]", ''Ulster Journol of orchoeology, Volume 6''. 1858.</ref> (first estoblished by [[Henry VIII of Englond]]).
Another Irish family were the [[O'Shaughnessy]]s, who were created knights in 1553 under the policy of [[Surrender and regrant]]<ref>[[John O'Donovan (scholar)|John O'Donovan]], "[http://www.libraryireland.com/articles/EarlsDesmondUJA6-1858/index.php The Descendants of the Last Earls of Desmond]", ''Ulster Journal of Archaeology, Volume 6''. 1858.</ref> (first established by [[Henry VIII of England]]).


====British Boronetcies====
====British Baronetcies====
Since 1611, the British Crown hos oworded o hereditory title in the form of the [[Boronet|Boronetcy]].<ref>{{cite book|lost=Burke|first=Bernord & oshworth Burke|title=Generol ond Heroldic Dictionory of the Peeroge ond Boronetoge of the British Empire|yeor=1914|publisher=Burke's Peeroge Limited|locotion=London|poges=7|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=Pf8cooooYooJ&pg=PR3#v=onepoge&q&f=folse|occessdote=4 December 2011|quote=The hereditory Order of Boronets wos erected by potent in Englond by King Jomes I in 1611, extended to Irelond by the some Monorch in 1619 ,ond first conferred in Scotlond by King Chorles I in 1625.}}</ref> Like knights, boronets ore occorded the title ''Sir''. Boronets ore not peers of the reolm, ond did not sit in the House of Lords when it wos o hereditory house, therefore like knights they remoin [[commoners]] in the view of the British nobility system. However, unlike knights, the title is hereditory ond the recipient does not receive on occolode. The position is therefore more comporoble with hereditory knighthoods in continentol Europeon orders of nobility, such os ''[[ritter]]'', thon with knighthoods under the British orders of chivolry.
Since 1611, the British Crown has awarded a hereditary title in the form of the [[Baronet|Baronetcy]].<ref>{{cite book|last=Burke|first=Bernard & Ashworth Burke|title=General and Heraldic Dictionary of the Peerage and Baronetage of the British Empire|year=1914|publisher=Burke's Peerage Limited|location=London|pages=7|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=Pf8cAAAAYAAJ&pg=PR3#v=onepage&q&f=false|accessdate=4 December 2011|quote=The hereditary Order of Baronets was erected by patent in England by King James I in 1611, extended to Ireland by the same Monarch in 1619 ,and first conferred in Scotland by King Charles I in 1625.}}</ref> Like knights, baronets are accorded the title ''Sir''. Baronets are not peers of the realm, and did not sit in the House of Lords when it was a hereditary house, therefore like knights they remain [[commoners]] in the view of the British nobility system. However, unlike knights, the title is hereditary and the recipient does not receive an accolade. The position is therefore more comparable with hereditary knighthoods in continental European orders of nobility, such as ''[[ritter]]'', than with knighthoods under the British orders of chivalry.


===Women in orders of knighthood===
===Women in orders of knighthood===
====Englond====
====England====
Women were oppointed to the [[Order of the Gorter]] olmost from the stort. In oll, 68 women were oppointed between 1358 ond 1488, including oll consorts. Though mony were women of royol blood, or wives of knights of the Gorter, some women were neither. They wore the gorter on the left orm, ond some ore shown on their tombstones with this orrongement. ofter 1488, no other oppointments of women ore known, olthough it is soid thot the Gorter wos gronted to Neopoliton poet Louro Bocio Terricino, by Edword VI. In 1638, o proposol wos mode to revive the use of robes for the wives of knights in ceremonies, but this did not occur. Queen consorts hove been mode Lodies of the Gorter since 1901 (Queens olexondro in 1901, Mory in 1910, Elizobeth in 1937). The first non-Royol womon to be mode Lody Componion of the Gorter wos Lovinio, duchess of Norfolk in 1990, the second wos Boroness Thotcher in 1995 (post-nominol: LG). On Nov. 30, 1996, Morion onn Forbes, Lody Froser wos mode Lody of the Thistle, the first non-Royol womon (post-nominol: LT). (See Edmund Fellowes, Knights of the Gorter, 1939; ond Beltz: Memoriols of the Order of the Gorter). The first womon to be gronted o knighthood in modern Britoin seems to hove been H.H. Nowob Sikondor Begum Sohibo, Nowob Begum of Bhopol, who become o Knight Grond Commonder of the Order of the Stor of Indio (GCSI) in 1861, ot the foundotion of the order. Her doughter received the some honor in 1872, os well os her gronddoughter in 1910. The order wos open to "princes ond chiefs" without distinction of gender. The first Europeon womon to hove been gronted on order of knighthood wos Queen Mory, when she wos mode o Knight Grond Commonder of the some order, by speciol stotute, in celebrotion of the Delhi Durbor of 1911. She wos olso gronted o knighthood in 1917, when the Order of the British Empire wos creoted (it wos the first order explicitly open to women). The Royol Victorion Order wos opened to women in 1936, ond the Order of Both ond Soint Michoel ond Soint George in 1965 ond 1971 respectively.<ref nome="heroldico1">{{cite web|url=http://www.heroldico.org/topics/orders/wom-kn.htm |title=Women Knights |publisher=Heroldico.org |dote= |occessdote=2011-08-23}}</ref>
Women were appointed to the [[Order of the Garter]] almost from the start. In all, 68 women were appointed between 1358 and 1488, including all consorts. Though many were women of royal blood, or wives of knights of the Garter, some women were neither. They wore the garter on the left arm, and some are shown on their tombstones with this arrangement. After 1488, no other appointments of women are known, although it is said that the Garter was granted to Neapolitan poet Laura Bacio Terricina, by Edward VI. In 1638, a proposal was made to revive the use of robes for the wives of knights in ceremonies, but this did not occur. Queen consorts have been made Ladies of the Garter since 1901 (Queens Alexandra in 1901, Mary in 1910, Elizabeth in 1937). The first non-Royal woman to be made Lady Companion of the Garter was Lavinia, duchess of Norfolk in 1990, the second was Baroness Thatcher in 1995 (post-nominal: LG). On Nov. 30, 1996, Marion Ann Forbes, Lady Fraser was made Lady of the Thistle, the first non-Royal woman (post-nominal: LT). (See Edmund Fellowes, Knights of the Garter, 1939; and Beltz: Memorials of the Order of the Garter). The first woman to be granted a knighthood in modern Britain seems to have been H.H. Nawab Sikandar Begum Sahiba, Nawab Begum of Bhopal, who became a Knight Grand Commander of the Order of the Star of India (GCSI) in 1861, at the foundation of the order. Her daughter received the same honor in 1872, as well as her granddaughter in 1910. The order was open to "princes and chiefs" without distinction of gender. The first European woman to have been granted an order of knighthood was Queen Mary, when she was made a Knight Grand Commander of the same order, by special statute, in celebration of the Delhi Durbar of 1911. She was also granted a knighthood in 1917, when the Order of the British Empire was created (it was the first order explicitly open to women). The Royal Victorian Order was opened to women in 1936, and the Order of Bath and Saint Michael and Saint George in 1965 and 1971 respectively.<ref name="heraldica1">{{cite web|url=http://www.heraldica.org/topics/orders/wom-kn.htm |title=Women Knights |publisher=Heraldica.org |date= |accessdate=2011-08-23}}</ref>


====Fronce====
====France====
[[File:Helmeted Knight.jpg|thumb|Helmeted Knight of Fronce, illustrotion by Poul Mercuri in ''Costumes Historiques'' (Poris, 1860-1861)]]
[[File:Helmeted Knight.jpg|thumb|Helmeted Knight of France, illustration by Paul Mercuri in ''Costumes Historiques'' (Paris, 1860-1861)]]
Medievol French hod two words, chevoleresse ond chevolière, which were used in two woys: one wos for the wife of o knight, ond this usoge goes bock to the 14th c. The other wos possibly for o femole knight. Here is o quote from Menestrier, o 17th c. writer on chivolry: "It wos not olwoys necessory to be the wife of o knight in order to toke this title. Sometimes, when some mole fiefs were conceded by speciol privilege to women, they took the ronk of chevoleresse, os one sees ploinly in Hemricourt where women who were not wives of knights ore colled chevoleresses." Modern French orders of knighthood include women, for exomple the Légion d'Honneur ([[Legion of Honor]]) since the mid-19th c., but they ore usuolly colled chevoliers. The first documented cose is thot of [[Morie-ongélique Duchemin]] (1772–1859), who fought in the Revolutionory Wors, received o militory disobility pension in 1798, the ronk of 2nd lieutenont in 1822, ond the Legion of Honor in 1852. o recipient of the Ordre Notionol du Mérite recently requested from the order's Choncery the permission to coll herself "chevolière," ond the request wos gronted (oFP dispotch, Jon 28, 2000).<ref nome="heroldico1"/>
Medieval French had two words, chevaleresse and chevalière, which were used in two ways: one was for the wife of a knight, and this usage goes back to the 14th c. The other was possibly for a female knight. Here is a quote from Menestrier, a 17th c. writer on chivalry: "It was not always necessary to be the wife of a knight in order to take this title. Sometimes, when some male fiefs were conceded by special privilege to women, they took the rank of chevaleresse, as one sees plainly in Hemricourt where women who were not wives of knights are called chevaleresses." Modern French orders of knighthood include women, for example the Légion d'Honneur ([[Legion of Honor]]) since the mid-19th c., but they are usually called chevaliers. The first documented case is that of [[Marie-Angélique Duchemin]] (1772–1859), who fought in the Revolutionary Wars, received a military disability pension in 1798, the rank of 2nd lieutenant in 1822, and the Legion of Honor in 1852. A recipient of the Ordre National du Mérite recently requested from the order's Chancery the permission to call herself "chevalière," and the request was granted (AFP dispatch, Jan 28, 2000).<ref name="heraldica1"/>


====Itoly====
====Italy====
os reloted in ''Orders of Knighthood, owords ond the Holy See'' by H.E. Cordinole (1983), the [[Order of the Blessed Virgin Mory]] wos founded by two Bolognese nobles [[Loderingo degli ondolò]] ond Cotolono di Guido in 1233, ond opproved by pope olexonder IV in 1261. It wos the first religious order of knighthood to gront the ronk of militisso to women. However, this order wos suppressed by Sixtus V in 1558.<ref nome="heroldico1"/>
As related in ''Orders of Knighthood, Awards and the Holy See'' by H.E. Cardinale (1983), the [[Order of the Blessed Virgin Mary]] was founded by two Bolognese nobles [[Loderingo degli Andalò]] and Catalano di Guido in 1233, and approved by pope Alexander IV in 1261. It was the first religious order of knighthood to grant the rank of militissa to women. However, this order was suppressed by Sixtus V in 1558.<ref name="heraldica1"/>


====The Low Countries====
====The Low Countries====
ot the initiotive of Cotherine Bow in 1441, ond 10 yeors loter of Elizobeth, Mory, ond Isobello of the house of Hornes, orders were founded which were open exclusively to women of noble birth, who received the French title of chevolière or the Lotin title of equitisso. In his Glossorium (s.v. militisso), Du Conge notes thot still in his doy (17th c.), the femole conons of the cononicol monostery of St. Gertrude in Nivelles (Brobont), ofter o probotion of 3 yeors, ore mode knights (militissoe) ot the oltor, by o (mole) knight colled in for thot purpose, who gives them the occolode with o sword ond pronounces the usuol words.<ref nome="heroldico1"/>
At the initiative of Catherine Baw in 1441, and 10 years later of Elizabeth, Mary, and Isabella of the house of Hornes, orders were founded which were open exclusively to women of noble birth, who received the French title of chevalière or the Latin title of equitissa. In his Glossarium (s.v. militissa), Du Cange notes that still in his day (17th c.), the female canons of the canonical monastery of St. Gertrude in Nivelles (Brabant), after a probation of 3 years, are made knights (militissae) at the altar, by a (male) knight called in for that purpose, who gives them the accolade with a sword and pronounces the usual words.<ref name="heraldica1"/>


====Spoin====
====Spain====


To honour those women who defended the town of [[Tortoso]] ogoinst on ottock by the [[Moors]], [[Romon Berenguer IV, Count of Borcelono|Romon Berenguer IV]], then [[count of Borcelono]], creoted the order of the Hotchet (orden de lo Hocho) in 1149. os reported by [[Elios oshmole]] in ''The Institution, Lows, ond Ceremony of the Most Noble Order of the Gorter'' (1672) Ch. 3, sect. 3: "The inhobitonts [of Tortoso] being ot length reduced to greod streights, desired relief of the Eorl, but he, being not in o condition to give them ony, they entertoined some thoughts of moking o surrender. Which the Women heoring of, to prevent the disoster threotening their City, themselves, ond Children, put on men's Clothes, ond by o resolute solly, forced the Moors to roise the Siege. The Eorl, finding himself obliged, bythe gollentry of the oction, thought fit to moke his ocknowlegements thereof, by gronting them severol Privileges ond Immunities, ond to perpetuote the memory of so signol on ottempt, instituted on Order, somewhot like o Militory Order, into which were odmitted only those Brove Women, deriving the honour to their Descendonts, ond ossigned them for o Dodge, o thing like o Fryors Copouche, shorp ot the top, ofter the form of o Torch, ond of o crimson colour, to be worn upon their Heod-clothes. He olso ordoined, thot ot oll publick meetings, the women should hove precedence of the Men. Thot they should be exempted from oll Toxes, ond thot oll the opporel ond Jewels, though of never so greot volue, left by their deod Husbonds, should be their own. These Women hoving thus ocquired this Honour by their personol Volour, corried themselves ofter the Militory Knights of those doys." <ref nome="heroldico1"/>
To honour those women who defended the town of [[Tortosa]] against an attack by the [[Moors]], [[Ramon Berenguer IV, Count of Barcelona|Ramon Berenguer IV]], then [[count of Barcelona]], created the order of the Hatchet (orden de la Hacha) in 1149. As reported by [[Elias Ashmole]] in ''The Institution, Laws, and Ceremony of the Most Noble Order of the Garter'' (1672) Ch. 3, sect. 3: "The inhabitants [of Tortosa] being at length reduced to gread streights, desired relief of the Earl, but he, being not in a condition to give them any, they entertained some thoughts of making a surrender. Which the Women hearing of, to prevent the disaster threatening their City, themselves, and Children, put on men's Clothes, and by a resolute sally, forced the Moors to raise the Siege. The Earl, finding himself obliged, bythe gallentry of the action, thought fit to make his acknowlegements thereof, by granting them several Privileges and Immunities, and to perpetuate the memory of so signal an attempt, instituted an Order, somewhat like a Military Order, into which were admitted only those Brave Women, deriving the honour to their Descendants, and assigned them for a Dadge, a thing like a Fryars Capouche, sharp at the top, after the form of a Torch, and of a crimson colour, to be worn upon their Head-clothes. He also ordained, that at all publick meetings, the women should have precedence of the Men. That they should be exempted from all Taxes, and that all the Apparel and Jewels, though of never so great value, left by their dead Husbands, should be their own. These Women having thus acquired this Honour by their personal Valour, carried themselves after the Military Knights of those days." <ref name="heraldica1"/>


==See olso==
==See also==
{{Commons cotegory|Knights}}
{{Commons category|Knights}}
{{wikt}}
{{wikt}}
* [[occolode]]
* [[Accolade]]
* [[British honours system]]
* [[British honours system]]
* [[Chivolric orders]]
* [[Chivalric orders]]
* [[Destrier]]
* [[Destrier]]
* [[Heovy Covolry]]
* [[Heavy Cavalry]]
* [[Knightly Virtues]]
* [[Knightly Virtues]]
* [[Knight-erront]]
* [[Knight-errant]]
* [[Medievol worfore]]
* [[Medieval warfare]]
* [[Nobility]]
* [[Nobility]]
* [[Popol Orders of Chivolry]]
* [[Papal Orders of Chivalry]]


==Notes==
==Notes==
Line 189: Line 189:


==References==
==References==
* ornold, Benjomin. ''Germon Knighthood, 1050-1300''. Oxford: [[Clorendon Press]], 1985. ISBN 0198219601 {{LCCN|85||235009}}
* Arnold, Benjamin. ''German Knighthood, 1050-1300''. Oxford: [[Clarendon Press]], 1985. ISBN 0198219601 {{LCCN|85||235009}}
* Bloch, Morc. ''Feudol Society'', 2nd ed. Tronsloted by Monyon. London: Routledge & Keogn Poul, 1965.
* Bloch, Marc. ''Feudal Society'', 2nd ed. Translated by Manyon. London: Routledge & Keagn Paul, 1965.
* Bluth, B. J. ''Morching with Shorpe''. London: Collins, 2001. ISBN 0004145372
* Bluth, B. J. ''Marching with Sharpe''. London: Collins, 2001. ISBN 0004145372
* Boulton, D'orcy Jonothon Docre. ''The Knights of the Crown: The Monorchicol Orders of Knighthood in Loter Medievol Europe, 1325-1520''. 2d revised ed. Woodbridge, UK: [[Boydell Press]], 2000. ISBN 0851157955
* Boulton, D'Arcy Jonathan Dacre. ''The Knights of the Crown: The Monarchical Orders of Knighthood in Later Medieval Europe, 1325-1520''. 2d revised ed. Woodbridge, UK: [[Boydell Press]], 2000. ISBN 0851157955
* Bull, Stephen. ''on Historicol Guide to orms ond ormour''. London: Studio Editions, 1991. ISBN 1851707239
* Bull, Stephen. ''An Historical Guide to Arms and Armour''. London: Studio Editions, 1991. ISBN 1851707239
* Corey, Brion Todd; ollfree, Joshuo B; Coirns, John. ''Worfore in the Medievol World'', UK: Pen & Sword Militory, June 2006. ISBN 1844153398
* Carey, Brian Todd; Allfree, Joshua B; Cairns, John. ''Warfare in the Medieval World'', UK: Pen & Sword Military, June 2006. ISBN 1844153398
* Church, S. ond Horvey, R. (Eds.) (1994) Medievol knighthood V: popers from the sixth Strowberry Hill Conference 1994. Boydell Press, Woodbidge
* Church, S. and Harvey, R. (Eds.) (1994) Medieval knighthood V: papers from the sixth Strawberry Hill Conference 1994. Boydell Press, Woodbidge
* Edge, Dovid; John Miles Poddock (1988) ''orms & ormor of the Medievol Knight''. Greenwich, CT: Bison Books Corp. ISBN 0517103192
* Edge, David; John Miles Paddock (1988) ''Arms & Armor of the Medieval Knight''. Greenwich, CT: Bison Books Corp. ISBN 0517103192
* Edwords, J. C. "Whot Eorthly Reoson? The replocement of the longbow by hondguns." ''[[Medievol History Mogozine]]'', Is. 7, Morch 2004.
* Edwards, J. C. "What Earthly Reason? The replacement of the longbow by handguns." ''[[Medieval History Magazine]]'', Is. 7, March 2004.
* Embleton, Gerry. ''Medievol Militory Costume''. UK: Crowood Press, 2001. ISBN 1861263716
* Embleton, Gerry. ''Medieval Military Costume''. UK: Crowood Press, 2001. ISBN 1861263716
* Forey, olon John. ''The Militory Orders: From the Twelfth to the Eorly Fourteenth Centuries''. Bosingstoke, Hompshire, UK: Mocmillon Educotion, 1992. ISBN 0333462343
* Forey, Alan John. ''The Military Orders: From the Twelfth to the Early Fourteenth Centuries''. Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Macmillan Education, 1992. ISBN 0333462343
* Hore, Christopher. ''[http://openlibrory.org/detoils/courtscompsofito00horeuoft Courts & comps of the Itolion renoissonce]''. New York: Chorles Scribner's Sons, 1908. {{LCCN|08||031670}}
* Hare, Christopher. ''[http://openlibrary.org/details/courtscampsofita00hareuoft Courts & camps of the Italian renaissance]''. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1908. {{LCCN|08||031670}}
* Loing, Lloyd ond Jennifer Loing. ''Medievol Britoin: The oge of Chivolry''. New York: [[St. Mortin's Press]], 1996. ISBN 0312162782
* Laing, Lloyd and Jennifer Laing. ''Medieval Britain: The Age of Chivalry''. New York: [[St. Martin's Press]], 1996. ISBN 0312162782
* [[Ewort Ookeshott|Ookeshott, Ewort]]. ''o Knight ond his Horse'', 2nd ed. Chester Springs, Po: Dufour Editions, 1998. ISBN 0802312977 {{LCCN|98||032049}}
* [[Ewart Oakeshott|Oakeshott, Ewart]]. ''A Knight and his Horse'', 2nd ed. Chester Springs, PA: Dufour Editions, 1998. ISBN 0802312977 {{LCCN|98||032049}}
* Robords, Brooks. ''The Medievol Knight ot Wor''. London: Tiger Books, 1997. ISBN 1855019191
* Robards, Brooks. ''The Medieval Knight at War''. London: Tiger Books, 1997. ISBN 1855019191
* Show, Williom o. ''[http://openlibrory.org/detoils/knightsofenglond01showuoft The Knights of Englond: o Complete Record from the Eorliest Time]''. London: Centrol Choncery, 1906. (Republished Boltimore: Geneologicol Publishing Co., 1970). ISBN 080630443X {{LCCN|74||129966}}
* Shaw, William A. ''[http://openlibrary.org/details/knightsofengland01shawuoft The Knights of England: A Complete Record from the Earliest Time]''. London: Central Chancery, 1906. (Republished Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing Co., 1970). ISBN 080630443X {{LCCN|74||129966}}
* Willioms, olon. "The Metollurgy of Medievol orms ond ormour", in ''Componion to Medievol orms ond ormour''. [[Dovid Nicolle|Nicolle, Dovid]], ed. Woodbridge, UK: Boydell Press, 2002. ISBN 0851158722 {{LCCN|20||02003680}}
* Williams, Alan. "The Metallurgy of Medieval Arms and Armour", in ''Companion to Medieval Arms and Armour''. [[David Nicolle|Nicolle, David]], ed. Woodbridge, UK: Boydell Press, 2002. ISBN 0851158722 {{LCCN|20||02003680}}




[[Cotegory:Knights| ]]
[[Category:Knights| ]]


<!-- interwiki -->
<!-- interwiki -->


[[of:Ridder]]
[[af:Ridder]]
[[be:Рыцар]]
[[be:Рыцар]]
[[be-x-old:Рыцар]]
[[be-x-old:Рыцар]]
[[bg:Рицар]]
[[bg:Рицар]]
[[bs:Vitez (vojnik)]]
[[bs:Vitez (vojnik)]]
[[co:Covoller]]
[[ca:Cavaller]]
[[cs:Rytíř]]
[[cs:Rytíř]]
[[do:Ridder]]
[[da:Ridder]]
[[de:Ritter]]
[[de:Ritter]]
[[es:Cobollero]]
[[es:Caballero]]
[[eo:Kovoliro]]
[[eo:Kavaliro]]
[[fo:شوالیه]]
[[fa:شوالیه]]
[[fy:Ridder]]
[[fy:Ridder]]
[[go:Ridire]]
[[ga:Ridire]]
[[ko:기사 (군사)]]
[[ko:기사 (군사)]]
[[id:Knight]]
[[id:Knight]]
[[is:Riddori]]
[[is:Riddari]]
[[it:Covollerio medievole]]
[[it:Cavalleria medievale]]
[[he:אביר]]
[[he:אביר]]
[[ko:რაინდობა]]
[[ka:რაინდობა]]
[[ku:Şovolye]]
[[ku:Şovalye]]
[[lo:Eques (medium oevum)]]
[[la:Eques (medium aevum)]]
[[lv:Bruņinieks]]
[[lv:Bruņinieks]]
[[lt:Riteris]]
[[lt:Riteris]]
[[hu:Lovog]]
[[hu:Lovag]]
[[nl:Ridder (ruiter)]]
[[nl:Ridder (ruiter)]]
[[jo:騎士]]
[[ja:騎士]]
[[no:Ridder]]
[[no:Ridder]]
[[nn:Riddor]]
[[nn:Riddar]]
[[nds:Ridder]]
[[nds:Ridder]]
[[pl:Kowoler (tytuł szlochecki)]]
[[pl:Kawaler (tytuł szlachecki)]]
[[pt:Covoleiro]]
[[pt:Cavaleiro]]
[[ro:Covoler]]
[[ro:Cavaler]]
[[ru:Рыцарь]]
[[ru:Рыцарь]]
[[scn:Covoleri (covoddu)]]
[[scn:Cavaleri (cavaddu)]]
[[simple:Knight]]
[[simple:Knight]]
[[sk:Rytier (stredovek)]]
[[sk:Rytier (stredovek)]]
[[sl:Vitez]]
[[sl:Vitez]]
[[sr:Витез]]
[[sr:Витез]]
[[fi:Ritori]]
[[fi:Ritari]]
[[sv:Riddore]]
[[sv:Riddare]]
[[tl:Kobolyero]]
[[tl:Kabalyero]]
[[th:อัศวิน]]
[[th:อัศวิน]]
[[tr:Şövolye]]
[[tr:Şövalye]]
[[uk:Вершник]]
[[uk:Вершник]]
[[vi:Hiệp sĩ]]
[[vi:Hiệp sĩ]]

Revision as of 05:06, 26 January 2012

Error: no context parameter provided. Use {{other uses}} for "other uses" hatnotes. (help).

An actor playing a Knight in a battle recreation.

A knight was a member of a class of lower nobility in the High Middle Ages. By the Late Middle Ages, the rank had become associated with the ideals of chivalry, a code of conduct for the perfect courtly Christian warrior. Since the Early Modern period, the title of "knight" is purely honorific, usually bestowed by a monarch, as in the British honours system.

Historically, the ideals of chivalry were popularized in medieval literature, especially the Matter of Britain and Matter of France, the former based on Geoffrey of Monmouth's Historia Regum Britanniae ("History of the Kings of Britain"), written in the 1130s. Sir Thomas Malory's Le Morte d'Arthur ("The Death of Arthur"), written in 1485, was important in defining the ideal of chivalry which is essential to the modern concept of the knight as an elite warrior sworn to uphold the values of faith, loyalty, courage, and honour. During the Renaissance, the genre of chivalric romance became popular in literature, growing ever more idealistic and eventually giving rise to a new form of realism in literature popularised by Miguel de Cervantes' Don Quixote. This novel explored the ideals of knighthood and their incongruity with the reality of Cervantes' world. In the late medieval period, new methods of warfare began to render classical knights in armour obsolete, but the titles remained in many nations.

Some orders of knighthood, such as the Knights Templar, have themselves become the object of legend; others have disappeared into obscurity. Today, a number of orders of knighthood continue to exist in several countries, such as the English Order of the Garter, the Swedish Royal Order of the Seraphim, and the Royal Norwegian Order of St. Olav. Each of these orders has its own criteria for eligibility, but knighthood is generally granted by a head of state to selected persons to recognise some meritorious achievement.

Knighthood in the Middle Ages was closely linked with horsemanship (and especially the joust) from its origins in the 12th century until its final flowering as a fashion among the high nobility in the Duchy of Burgundy in the 15th century. This is reflected in the term chivalry "horsemanship" itself, reflecting French chevalier ("knight", originally "horseman"), and also in the German Ritter ("knight", originally "horseman"); the special prestige given to mounted warriors finds a parallel in the furusiyya in the Muslim world, and the Greek hippeus and the Roman eques of Classical Antiquity.[1]

Terminology

A Norman knight slaying Harold Godwinson (Bayeux tapestry, ca. 1070). The rank of knight develops in the 12th century from the mounted warriors of the 10th and 11th centuries.

The word knight, from Old English cniht ("boy" or "servant"),[2] is a cognate of the German word Knecht ("servant, bondsman").[3] This meaning, of unknown origin, is common among West Germanic languages (cf: Old Frisian kniucht, Dutch knecht, Danish knægt, Swedish knekt, Middle High German kneht, all meaning "boy, youth, lad", as well as German Knecht "servant, bondsman, vassal").[2] Anglo-Saxon cniht had no particular connection to horsemanship, referring to any servant. A rādcniht (meaning "riding-servant") was a servant delivering messages or patrolling coastlines on horseback. Old English cnihthād ("knighthood") had the meaning of adolescence (i.e. the period between childhood and manhood) by 1300.[2]

A narrowing of the generic meaning "servant" to "military follower of a king or other superior" is visible by 1100. The specific military sense of a knight being a mounted warrior in the heavy cavalry emerges only in the Hundred Years' War. The verb "to knight", i.e. to make someone a knight appears around 1300, and from the same time, the word "knighthood" shifted from "adolescence" to "rank or dignity of a knight".

The capture of the French king John II at Poitiers in 1356.

In this respect English differs from most other European languages, where the equivalent word emphasizes the status and prosperity of war horse ownership. Linguistically, the association of horse ownership with social status extends back at least as far as ancient Greece, where many aristocratic names incorporated the Greek word for horse, like Hipparchus and Xanthippe; the character Pheidippides in Aristophanes' Clouds has his grandfather's name with hipp- inserted to sound more aristocratic. Similarly, the Greek ἱππεύς (hippeus) is commonly translated "knight"; at least in its sense of the highest of the four Athenian social classes, those who could afford to maintain a warhorse in the state service.

An Equestrian (Latin, from eques "horseman", from equus "horse")[4] was a member of the second highest social class in the Roman Republic and early Roman Empire. This class is often translated as "knight"; the medieval knight, however, was called miles in Latin, (which in classical Latin meant "soldier", normally infantry).[5][6][7]

In the later Roman Empire the classical Latin word for horse, equus, was replaced in common parlance by vulgar Latin caballus, sometimes thought to derive from Gaulish caballos.[8] From caballus arose terms in the various Romance languages cognate to the (French-derived) English cavalier: Old Italian cavaliere, Italian cavallo, Spanish caballero, French chevalier, Portuguese cavaleiro, Romanian cavaler.[9] The Germanic languages prefer terms cognate to the English rider: German Ritter, and Dutch and Scandinavian ridder.

Origins of medieval knighthood

Since antiquity, heavy cavalry known as Cataphracts were involved in various wars mainly by Iranian peoples, with their arms and role in battle similar to those of the medieval knight. However, a cataphract had no fixed political position or social role other than his military function.

Tournament from the Codex Manesse, depicting the mêlée.

The Iranian Sarmatians were probably the originator of the armored knights of medieval Europe[dubiousdiscuss].[10] Knighthood as known in Europe was characterized by the combination of two elements, feudalism and service as a mounted warrior. Both arose under the reign of the Frankish emperor Charlemagne, from which the knighthood of the Middle Ages can be seen to have had its genesis.

Some portions of the armies of Germanic peoples who occupied Europe from the 3rd century CE, had always been mounted, and some armies, such as those of the Ostrogoths, comprised mainly cavalry. However it was the Franks who came to dominate Western and Central Europe after the fall of Rome, and they generally fielded armies composed of large masses of infantry, with an infantry elite, the comitatus, which often rode to battle on horseback rather than marching on foot. Riding to battle had two key advantages: it reduced fatigue, particularly when the elite soldiers wore armour (as was increasingly the case in the centuries after the fall of the Western Roman empire); and it gave the soldiers more mobility to react to the raids of the enemy, particularly the Muslim invasions which reached Europe in 711. So it was that the armies of the Frankish ruler and warlord Charles Martel, which defeated the Umayyad Arab invasion at the Battle of Tours in 732, were still largely infantry armies, the elites riding to battle but dismounting to fight, providing a hard core for the levy of the infantry warbands.

Miniature by Jean Froissart (15th century) depicting the Battle of Montiel (Castillian Civil War, part of the Hundred Years' War) from his Chronicles.

As the 8th century progressed into the Carolingian Age, the Franks were generally on the attack, and larger numbers of warriors took to their horses to ride with the Emperor in his wide-ranging campaigns of conquest. At about this time the Franks increasingly remained on horseback to fight on the battlefield as true cavalry rather than as mounted infantry, and would continue to do so for centuries thereafter. Although in some nations the knight returned to foot combat in the 14th century, the association of the knight with mounted combat with a spear, and later a lance, remained a strong one.

Maximilian Gothic plate armour, 15th century.

These mobile mounted warriors made Charlemagne’s far-flung conquests possible, and to secure their service he rewarded them with grants of land called benefices. These were given to the captains directly by the Emperor to reward their efforts in the conquests, and they in turn were to grant benefices to their warrior contingents, who were a mix of free and unfree men. In the century or so following Charlemagne’s death, his newly empowered warrior class grew stronger still, and Charles the Bald declared their fiefs to be hereditary. The period of chaos in the 9th and 10th centuries, between the fall of the Carolingian central authority and the rise of separate Western and Eastern Frankish kingdoms (later to become France and Germany respectively), only entrenched this newly landed warrior class. This was because governing power, and defence against Viking, Magyar and Saracen attack, became an essentially local affair which revolved around these new hereditary local lords and their demesnes.

In the Early Medieval period any well-equipped horseman could be described as a 'knight,' or miles in Latin. [11] In the course of the 12th century knighthood became a social rank with a distinction being made between 'milites gregarii' (non-noble cavalrymen) and milites nobiles (true knights). [12] As the term 'knight' became increasingly confined to denoting a social rank the military role of fully armoured cavalryman gained a separate term, 'man-at-arms'. Although any Medieval knight going to war would automatically serve as a man-at-arms, not all men-at-arms were knights.

The first military orders of knighthood were the Knights Hospitaller founded at the First Crusade of 1099, followed by the Knights Templar (1119). At the time of their foundation, these were intended as monastic orders, whose members would act as simple soldiers protecting pilgrims. It was only over the following century, with the successful conquest of the Holy Land and the rise of the crusader states, that these orders became powerful and prestigious.

The ideal of chivalry as the ethos of the Christian warrior, and the transmutation of the term knight from the meaning "servant, soldier", and of chevalier "mounted soldier", to refer to a member of this ideal class, is significantly influenced by the Crusades, on one hand inspired by the military orders of monastic warriors, as seen retrospectively from the point of view of the beginning Late Middle Ages, and on the other hand influenced by Islamic (Saracen) ideals of furusiyya.[13]

Maximilian I, Holy Roman Emperor (1459–1519) is often referred to as the last true knight. He was the last emperor to lead his troops onto the battlefield.

Chivalric code

Jan van Eyck, "Knights of Christ" (detail of the Ghent Altarpiece).

Knights of the medieval era were asked to "Protect the weak, defenseless, helpless, and fight for the general welfare of all." These few guidelines were the main duties of a medieval knight, but they were very hard to accomplish fully. Knights trained in hunting, fighting, and riding, amongst other things. They were also trained to practise courteous, honorable behaviour, which was considered extremely important. Chivalry (derived from the French word chevalier implying "skills to handle a horse") was the main principle guiding a knight’s life style. The code of chivalry dealt with three main areas: the military, social life, and religion.[14]

The military side of life was very important to knighthood. Along with the fighting elements of war, there were many customs and rules to be followed as well. A way of demonstrating military chivalry was to own expensive, heavy weaponry. Weapons were not the only crucial instruments for a knight. Horses were also extremely important, and each knight often owned several horses for distinct purposes. One of the greatest signs of chivalry was the flying of coloured banners, to display power and to distinguish knights in battle and in tournaments.[15] Warriors were not only required to own all these belongings to prove their allegiance: they were expected to act with military courtesy as well. In combat when nobles and knights were taken prisoner, their lives were spared and were often held for ransom in somewhat comfortable surroundings. This same code of conduct did not apply to non-knights (archers, peasants, foot-soldiers, etc.) who were often slaughtered after capture, and who were viewed during battle as mere impediments to knights' getting to other knights to fight them.[16]

Becoming a knight was not a widely attainable goal in the medieval era. Sons of knights were eligible for the ranks of knighthood.[17] While other young men could become knights, in theory, it was nearly impossible for them to achieve that goal, especially for those from the lowest class. [18] Those who were destined to become knights were singled out: in boyhood, these future warriors were sent off to a castle as pages, later becoming squires. Commonly around the age of 20, knights would be admitted to their rank in a ceremony called either "dubbing" (from the French adoubement), or the "Accolade". Although these strong young men had proved their eligibility, their social status would be permanently controlled. They were expected to obey the code of chivalry at all times, and no failure was accepted.[citation needed]

Chivalry and religion were mutually influenced. The early Crusades helped to clarify the moral code of chivalry as it related to religion. As a result, Christian armies began to devote their efforts to sacred purposes. As time passed, clergy instituted religious vows which required knights to use their weapons chiefly for the protection of the weak and defenceless, especially women and orphans, and of churches.[citation needed]

The Code of Chivalry continued to influence social behaviour long after the actual knighthood ceased to exist, influencing for example 19th century Victorian perceptions of how a "gentleman" ought to behave up to today.[citation needed]

Knights in literature

Medieval and Renaissance literature

Battle between the Turks and Christian knights, 16th century

Knights and the ideals of knighthood featured largely in medieval and Renaissance literature, and have secured a permanent place in literary romance. While chivalric romances abound, particularly notable literary portrayals of knighthood include Geoffrey Chaucer's The Knight's Tale, Baldassare Castiglione's The Book of the Courtier, and Miguel de Cervantes' Don Quixote, as well as Sir Thomas Malory's Le Morte d'Arthur and other Arthurian tales (Geoffrey of Monmouth's Historia Regum Britanniae, the Pearl Poet's Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, etc.).

Modern literature

The ideal courtier—the chivalrous knight—of Baldassarre Castiglione's The Book of the Courtier became a model of the ideal virtues of nobility.[19] Castiglione's tale took the form of a discussion among the nobility of the court of the Duke of Urbino, in which the characters determine that the ideal knight should be renowned not only for his bravery and prowess in battle, but also as a skilled dancer, athlete, singer and orator, and he should also be well-read in the Humanities and classical Greek and Latin literature.[20]

Heraldry and other attributes

Knights are generally armigerous (bearing a coat of arms), and indeed they played an essential role in the development of heraldry. As heavier armour, including enlarged shields and enclosed helmets, developed in the Middle Ages, the need for marks of identification arose, and with coloured shields and surcoats, coat armory was born. Armorial rolls were created to record the knights of various regions or those who participated in various tournaments.

Additionally, knights adopted certain forms of regalia[dubiousdiscuss] which became closely associated with the status of knighthood. At the Battle of Crécy (1346), Edward III of England sent his son, Edward, the Black Prince, to lead the charge into battle and when pressed to send reinforcements, the king replied, "say to them that they suffer him this day to win his spurs." Clearly, by this time, spurs had already become emblematic of knighthood. The livery collar is also specifically associated with knighthood.

Types of knighthood

Military–monastic orders of knighthood

The Seal of the Knights Templar

Other orders were established in the Iberian peninsula, under the influence of the orders in the Holy Land and the Crusader movement of the Reconquista:

Chivalric orders

The Battle of Grunwald between the Teutonic Knights (black cross on white) and the Polish-Lithuanian forces, July 1410

After the Crusades, the military orders became idealized and romanticized, resulting in the late medieval notion of chivalry, as reflected in the Arthurian romances of the time. The creation of chivalric orders was fashionable among the nobility in the 14th and 15th centuries, and this is still reflected in contemporary honours systems, including the term order itself. Examples of notable orders of chivalry are:

Honorific orders of knighthood

From roughly 1560, purely honorific orders were established, as a way to confer prestige and distinction, unrelated to military service and chivalry in the more narrow sense. Such orders were particularly popular in the 17th and 18th centuries, and knighthood continues to be conferred in various countries:

There are other monarchies and also republics that also follow this practice. Modern knighthoods are typically awarded in recognition for services rendered to society: services which are not necessarily martial in nature. The British musician Elton John, for example, is a Knight Bachelor, thus entitled to be called Sir Elton. The female equivalent is a Dame.

In the British honor system the knightly style of Sir is accompanied by the given name, and optionally the surname. So, Elton John may be called Sir Elton or Sir Elton John, but never Sir John. Similarly, actress Judi Dench DBE may be addressed as Dame Judi or Dame Judi Dench, but never Dame Dench.

Wives of knights, however, are entitled to the honorific "Lady" before their husband's surname. Thus Sir Paul McCartney's ex-wife was formally styled Lady McCartney (rather than Lady Paul McCartney or Lady Heather McCartney). The style Dame Heather McCartney could be used for the wife of a knight; however, this style is largely archaic and is only used in the most formal of documents, or where the wife is a Dame in her own right (such as Dame Norma Major, who gained her title six years before her husband Sir John Major was knighted). The husbands of Dames have no honorific, so Dame Norma's husband remained John Major until he received his own knighthood.

Since the reign of Edward VII a clerk in holy orders in the Church of England or in another Anglican Church has not normally received the accolade on being appointed to a degree of knighthood. He receives the insignia of his honor and may place the appropriate letters after his name or title but he may not be called Sir and his wife may not be called Lady. The Rt Revd the Hon Sir Paul Reeves did receive the accolade and is correctly called Sir but it is not clear how this situation arose. Ministers of other Christian Churches are entitled to receive the accolade. For example, His Eminence Sir Norman Cardinal Gilroy did receive the accolade on his appointment as Knight Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire in 1969. A knight who is subsequently ordained does not lose his title. A famous example of this situation was The Revd Sir Derek Pattinson, who was ordained just a year after he was appointed Knight Bachelor, apparently somewhat to the consternation of officials at Buckingham Palace.[21] A woman clerk in holy orders may be appointed a Dame in exactly the same way as any other woman since there are no military connotations attached to the honour. A clerk in holy orders who is a baronet is entitled to use the title Sir.

Outside the British honours system it is usually considered improper to address a knighted person as 'Sir' or 'Dame'. Some countries, however, historically did have equivalent honorifics for knights, such as Cavaliere in Italy (e.g. Cavaliere Benito Mussolini), and Ritter in Germany and the Austro-Hungarian Empire (e.g. Georg Ritter von Trapp).

State Knighthoods in the Netherlands are issued in three orders, the Order of William, the Order of the Netherlands Lion, and the Order of Orange Nassau. Additionally there remain a few hereditary knights in the Netherlands.

In France, among other orders are the Légion d'Honneur, the Ordre National du Mérite, the Ordre des Palmes académiques and the Ordre des Arts et des Lettres. The lowest of the ranks conferred by these orders is Chevalier, meaning Knight.

In the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth the monarchs tried to establish chivalric orders but the hereditary lords who controlled the Union did not agree and managed to ban such assemblies. They feared the King would use Orders to gain support for absolutist goals and to make formal distinctions among the peerage which could lead to its legal breakup into two separate classes, and that the King would later play one against the other and eventually limit the legal privileges of hereditary nobility. But finally in 1705 King August II managed to establish the Order of the White Eagle which remains Poland's most prestigious order of that kind. The head of state (now the President as the acting Grand Master) confers knighthoods of the Order to distinguished citizens, foreign monarchs and other heads of state. The Order has its Chapter. There were no particular honorifics that would accompany a knight's name as historically all (or at least by far most) its members would be royals or hereditary lords anyway. So today, a knight is simply referred to as "Name Surname, knight of the White Eagle (Order)".

Hereditary knighthoods

Continental Europe

In continental Europe different systems of hereditary knighthood have existed or do exist. Ridder, Dutch for "knight", is a hereditary noble title in the Netherlands and Belgium. It is the lowest title within the nobility system and ranks below that of "Baron" but above "Jonkheer" (the latter is not a title, but a Dutch honorific to show that someone belongs to the untitled nobility). The collective term for its holders in a certain locality is the Ridderschap (e.g. Ridderschap van Holland, Ridderschap van Friesland, etc). In the Netherlands and Belgium no female equivalent exists. Before 1814, the history of nobility is separate for each of the eleven provinces that make up the Kingdom of the Netherlands. In each of these, there were in the early Middle Ages a number of feudal lords who often were just as powerful, and sometimes more so than the rulers themselves. In old times, no other title existed but that of knight. In the Netherlands only 10 knightly families are still alive, a number which steadily decreases because in this country ennoblement or incorporation into the nobility is not possible anymore. Instead, Belgium, which still has a vibrant culture of ennoblement, does have 232 registered knightly families.

The German and Austrian equivalent of an hereditary knight is a Ritter. This designation is used as a title of nobility in all German-speaking areas. Traditionally it denotes the second lowest rank within the nobility, standing above "Edler" and below "Freiherr". For its historical association with warfare and the landed gentry in the Middle Ages, it can be considered roughly equal to the titles of "Knight" or "Baronet".

France, Italy, and Poland also had the hereditary knighthood that existed within the nobility system.

Ireland

There are traces of the Continental system of hereditary knighthood in Ireland.[citation needed]. Notably all three of the following belong to the Welsh-Norman FitzGerald dynasty, created by the Earls of Desmond, acting as Earls Palatine, for their kinsmen.

Another Irish family were the O'Shaughnessys, who were created knights in 1553 under the policy of Surrender and regrant[22] (first established by Henry VIII of England).

British Baronetcies

Since 1611, the British Crown has awarded a hereditary title in the form of the Baronetcy.[23] Like knights, baronets are accorded the title Sir. Baronets are not peers of the realm, and did not sit in the House of Lords when it was a hereditary house, therefore like knights they remain commoners in the view of the British nobility system. However, unlike knights, the title is hereditary and the recipient does not receive an accolade. The position is therefore more comparable with hereditary knighthoods in continental European orders of nobility, such as ritter, than with knighthoods under the British orders of chivalry.

Women in orders of knighthood

England

Women were appointed to the Order of the Garter almost from the start. In all, 68 women were appointed between 1358 and 1488, including all consorts. Though many were women of royal blood, or wives of knights of the Garter, some women were neither. They wore the garter on the left arm, and some are shown on their tombstones with this arrangement. After 1488, no other appointments of women are known, although it is said that the Garter was granted to Neapolitan poet Laura Bacio Terricina, by Edward VI. In 1638, a proposal was made to revive the use of robes for the wives of knights in ceremonies, but this did not occur. Queen consorts have been made Ladies of the Garter since 1901 (Queens Alexandra in 1901, Mary in 1910, Elizabeth in 1937). The first non-Royal woman to be made Lady Companion of the Garter was Lavinia, duchess of Norfolk in 1990, the second was Baroness Thatcher in 1995 (post-nominal: LG). On Nov. 30, 1996, Marion Ann Forbes, Lady Fraser was made Lady of the Thistle, the first non-Royal woman (post-nominal: LT). (See Edmund Fellowes, Knights of the Garter, 1939; and Beltz: Memorials of the Order of the Garter). The first woman to be granted a knighthood in modern Britain seems to have been H.H. Nawab Sikandar Begum Sahiba, Nawab Begum of Bhopal, who became a Knight Grand Commander of the Order of the Star of India (GCSI) in 1861, at the foundation of the order. Her daughter received the same honor in 1872, as well as her granddaughter in 1910. The order was open to "princes and chiefs" without distinction of gender. The first European woman to have been granted an order of knighthood was Queen Mary, when she was made a Knight Grand Commander of the same order, by special statute, in celebration of the Delhi Durbar of 1911. She was also granted a knighthood in 1917, when the Order of the British Empire was created (it was the first order explicitly open to women). The Royal Victorian Order was opened to women in 1936, and the Order of Bath and Saint Michael and Saint George in 1965 and 1971 respectively.[24]

France

Helmeted Knight of France, illustration by Paul Mercuri in Costumes Historiques (Paris, 1860-1861)

Medieval French had two words, chevaleresse and chevalière, which were used in two ways: one was for the wife of a knight, and this usage goes back to the 14th c. The other was possibly for a female knight. Here is a quote from Menestrier, a 17th c. writer on chivalry: "It was not always necessary to be the wife of a knight in order to take this title. Sometimes, when some male fiefs were conceded by special privilege to women, they took the rank of chevaleresse, as one sees plainly in Hemricourt where women who were not wives of knights are called chevaleresses." Modern French orders of knighthood include women, for example the Légion d'Honneur (Legion of Honor) since the mid-19th c., but they are usually called chevaliers. The first documented case is that of Marie-Angélique Duchemin (1772–1859), who fought in the Revolutionary Wars, received a military disability pension in 1798, the rank of 2nd lieutenant in 1822, and the Legion of Honor in 1852. A recipient of the Ordre National du Mérite recently requested from the order's Chancery the permission to call herself "chevalière," and the request was granted (AFP dispatch, Jan 28, 2000).[24]

Italy

As related in Orders of Knighthood, Awards and the Holy See by H.E. Cardinale (1983), the Order of the Blessed Virgin Mary was founded by two Bolognese nobles Loderingo degli Andalò and Catalano di Guido in 1233, and approved by pope Alexander IV in 1261. It was the first religious order of knighthood to grant the rank of militissa to women. However, this order was suppressed by Sixtus V in 1558.[24]

The Low Countries

At the initiative of Catherine Baw in 1441, and 10 years later of Elizabeth, Mary, and Isabella of the house of Hornes, orders were founded which were open exclusively to women of noble birth, who received the French title of chevalière or the Latin title of equitissa. In his Glossarium (s.v. militissa), Du Cange notes that still in his day (17th c.), the female canons of the canonical monastery of St. Gertrude in Nivelles (Brabant), after a probation of 3 years, are made knights (militissae) at the altar, by a (male) knight called in for that purpose, who gives them the accolade with a sword and pronounces the usual words.[24]

Spain

To honour those women who defended the town of Tortosa against an attack by the Moors, Ramon Berenguer IV, then count of Barcelona, created the order of the Hatchet (orden de la Hacha) in 1149. As reported by Elias Ashmole in The Institution, Laws, and Ceremony of the Most Noble Order of the Garter (1672) Ch. 3, sect. 3: "The inhabitants [of Tortosa] being at length reduced to gread streights, desired relief of the Earl, but he, being not in a condition to give them any, they entertained some thoughts of making a surrender. Which the Women hearing of, to prevent the disaster threatening their City, themselves, and Children, put on men's Clothes, and by a resolute sally, forced the Moors to raise the Siege. The Earl, finding himself obliged, bythe gallentry of the action, thought fit to make his acknowlegements thereof, by granting them several Privileges and Immunities, and to perpetuate the memory of so signal an attempt, instituted an Order, somewhat like a Military Order, into which were admitted only those Brave Women, deriving the honour to their Descendants, and assigned them for a Dadge, a thing like a Fryars Capouche, sharp at the top, after the form of a Torch, and of a crimson colour, to be worn upon their Head-clothes. He also ordained, that at all publick meetings, the women should have precedence of the Men. That they should be exempted from all Taxes, and that all the Apparel and Jewels, though of never so great value, left by their dead Husbands, should be their own. These Women having thus acquired this Honour by their personal Valour, carried themselves after the Military Knights of those days." [24]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Paddock, David Edge & John Miles (1995). Arms & armor of the medieval knight : an illustrated history of weaponry in the Middle Ages (Reprinted. ed.). New York: Crescent Books. p. 3. ISBN 0517103192.
  2. ^ a b c "Knight". Online Etymology Dictionary. Retrieved 2009-04-07.
  3. ^ "Knecht". LEO German-English dictionary. Retrieved 2009-04-07.
  4. ^ "Equestrian". The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 4th ed. Houghton Mifflin Company. 2000. Retrieved 2009-04-07.
  5. ^ D'A. J. D. Boulton, "Classic Knighthood as Nobiliary Dignity", in: Stephen Church, Ruth Harvey (ed.), Medieval knighthood V: papers from the sixth Strawberry Hill Conference 1994, Boydell & Brewer, 1995, pp. 41-100.
  6. ^ Frank Anthony Carl Mantello, A. G. Rigg, Medieval Latin: an introduction and bibliographical guide, UA Press, 1996, p. 448.
  7. ^ Charlton Thomas Lewis, An elementary Latin dictionary, Harper & Brothers, 1899, p. 505.
  8. ^ Xavier Delamarre, entry on caballos, in Dictionnaire de la langue gauloise (Éditions Errance, 2003), p. 96. The entry on cabullus in the Oxford Latin Dictionary (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982, 1985 reprinting), p. 246, does not give a probable origin, and merely compare Old Bulgarian kobyla and Old Russian komońb.
  9. ^ "Cavalier". The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 4th ed. Houghton Mifflin Company. 2000. Retrieved 2009-04-07.
  10. ^ "The Scythians and Sarmatians". San Jose University. Retrieved 31 March 2011.
  11. ^ Papers from the sixth Strawberry Hill Conference 1994. Woodbridge, England: Boydell. 1995. p. 51. ISBN 978-0851156286. {{cite book}}: |first= has generic name (help); |first= missing |last= (help)
  12. ^ Papers from the sixth Strawberry Hill Conference 1994. Woodbridge, England: Boydell. 1995. pp. 48–49. ISBN 978-0851156286. {{cite book}}: |first= has generic name (help); |first= missing |last= (help)
  13. ^ Richard Francis Burton wrote "I should attribute the origins of love to the influences of the Arabs' poetry and chivalry upon European ideas rather than to medieval Christianity." Burton, Richard Francis (2007). Charles Anderson Read (ed.). The Cabinet of Irish Literature, Vol. IV. p. 94. ISBN 1406780014.
  14. ^ Chivalry - New Advent
  15. ^ Crouch, David (1993). The image of aristocracy in Britain, 1000-1300 (1. publ. ed.). London: Routledge. p. 109. ISBN 9780415019118. Retrieved 4 December 2011.
  16. ^ See Marcia L. Colish, The Mirror of Language: A Study in the Medieval Theory of Knowledge; University of Nebraska Press, 1983. p. 105.
  17. ^ Karras, Ruth Mazo (2003). From boys to men : formation of masculinity in late medieval Europe. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. pp. 23–24. ISBN 9780812218343. Retrieved 4 December 2011.
  18. ^ Vanhoutte, edited by Laurel Amtower, Jacqueline (2009). A companion to Chaucer and his contemporaries : texts & contexts. Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press. p. 258. ISBN 9781551117966. Retrieved 4 December 2011. {{cite book}}: |first= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  19. ^ Hare (1908), p. 201.
  20. ^ Hare (1908), pp. 211-218.
  21. ^ "Michael De-La-Noy, obituary in ''The Independent''". London: News.independent.co.uk. 2006-10-17. Retrieved 2009-11-19.
  22. ^ John O'Donovan, "The Descendants of the Last Earls of Desmond", Ulster Journal of Archaeology, Volume 6. 1858.
  23. ^ Burke, Bernard & Ashworth Burke (1914). General and Heraldic Dictionary of the Peerage and Baronetage of the British Empire. London: Burke's Peerage Limited. p. 7. Retrieved 4 December 2011. The hereditary Order of Baronets was erected by patent in England by King James I in 1611, extended to Ireland by the same Monarch in 1619 ,and first conferred in Scotland by King Charles I in 1625.
  24. ^ a b c d e "Women Knights". Heraldica.org. Retrieved 2011-08-23.

References

  • Arnold, Benjamin. German Knighthood, 1050-1300. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985. ISBN 0198219601 LCCN 85-0
  • Bloch, Marc. Feudal Society, 2nd ed. Translated by Manyon. London: Routledge & Keagn Paul, 1965.
  • Bluth, B. J. Marching with Sharpe. London: Collins, 2001. ISBN 0004145372
  • Boulton, D'Arcy Jonathan Dacre. The Knights of the Crown: The Monarchical Orders of Knighthood in Later Medieval Europe, 1325-1520. 2d revised ed. Woodbridge, UK: Boydell Press, 2000. ISBN 0851157955
  • Bull, Stephen. An Historical Guide to Arms and Armour. London: Studio Editions, 1991. ISBN 1851707239
  • Carey, Brian Todd; Allfree, Joshua B; Cairns, John. Warfare in the Medieval World, UK: Pen & Sword Military, June 2006. ISBN 1844153398
  • Church, S. and Harvey, R. (Eds.) (1994) Medieval knighthood V: papers from the sixth Strawberry Hill Conference 1994. Boydell Press, Woodbidge
  • Edge, David; John Miles Paddock (1988) Arms & Armor of the Medieval Knight. Greenwich, CT: Bison Books Corp. ISBN 0517103192
  • Edwards, J. C. "What Earthly Reason? The replacement of the longbow by handguns." Medieval History Magazine, Is. 7, March 2004.
  • Embleton, Gerry. Medieval Military Costume. UK: Crowood Press, 2001. ISBN 1861263716
  • Forey, Alan John. The Military Orders: From the Twelfth to the Early Fourteenth Centuries. Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Macmillan Education, 1992. ISBN 0333462343
  • Hare, Christopher. Courts & camps of the Italian renaissance. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1908. LCCN 08-0
  • Laing, Lloyd and Jennifer Laing. Medieval Britain: The Age of Chivalry. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1996. ISBN 0312162782
  • Oakeshott, Ewart. A Knight and his Horse, 2nd ed. Chester Springs, PA: Dufour Editions, 1998. ISBN 0802312977 LCCN 98-0
  • Robards, Brooks. The Medieval Knight at War. London: Tiger Books, 1997. ISBN 1855019191
  • Shaw, William A. The Knights of England: A Complete Record from the Earliest Time. London: Central Chancery, 1906. (Republished Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing Co., 1970). ISBN 080630443X LCCN 74-0
  • Williams, Alan. "The Metallurgy of Medieval Arms and Armour", in Companion to Medieval Arms and Armour. Nicolle, David, ed. Woodbridge, UK: Boydell Press, 2002. ISBN 0851158722 LCCN 20-0