Jump to content

Third World: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Citations and Content (History, Aid and Development)
Line 7: Line 7:
The term '''''Third World''''' arose during the [[Cold War]] to define countries that remained non-aligned with either [[capitalism]] and [[NATO]] (which along with its allies represented the [[First World]]), or [[communism]] and the [[Soviet Union]] (which along with its allies represented the [[Second World]]). This definition provided a way of broadly categorizing the nations of the earth into three groups based on social, political, and economic divisions.
The term '''''Third World''''' arose during the [[Cold War]] to define countries that remained non-aligned with either [[capitalism]] and [[NATO]] (which along with its allies represented the [[First World]]), or [[communism]] and the [[Soviet Union]] (which along with its allies represented the [[Second World]]). This definition provided a way of broadly categorizing the nations of the earth into three groups based on social, political, and economic divisions.


Due to the fact that many [[developing country|underdeveloped countries]] are in the Third World, a common stereotype has arisen to designate underdevelopment in anything as "third world" in a [[pejorative]] way<ref>[http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/no-running-water/degrading-third-world-conditions-one-more-hurdle-for-disabled-man-on-reserve-132369633.html Usage in a Canadian newspaper]</ref><ref>[http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/255320/two-californias-victor-davis-hanson Usage in the [[National Review]]]</ref>
Due to the fact that many [[developing country|underdeveloped countries]] are in the Third World, a common stereotype has arisen to designate underdevelopment in anything as "Third World" in a [[pejorative]] way.<ref>[http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/no-running-water/degrading-third-world-conditions-one-more-hurdle-for-disabled-man-on-reserve-132369633.html Usage in a Canadian newspaper]</ref><ref>[http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/255320/two-californias-victor-davis-hanson Usage in the [[National Review]]]</ref> Over the last few decades, the term 'Third World' has been used interchangeably with the [[Global South]] and [[Developing Countries]] to describe poorer countries that have struggled to attain steady economic development. <ref name="Tomlinson">Tomlinson, B.R. (2003). “What was the Third World”, Journal of Contemporary History, 38(2): 307-321.</ref> The Third World has also been connected to the world economic division as 'periphery' countries in the world system that is dominated by the 'core' countries. <ref name="Tomlinson" /> Due to the complex history of evolving meanings and contexts, there is no clear or agreed upon definition of the Third World and the term is now less popular than it was during the 1970s and 80s. <ref name="Tomlinson" />


==Etymology==
==Etymology==
French demographer, anthropologist and historian [[Alfred Sauvy]], in an article published in the French magazine ''[[Le Nouvel Observateur|L'Observateur]]'', August 14, 1952, coined the term ''Third World'', referring to countries that were unaligned with either the Communist Soviet bloc or the Capitalist NATO bloc during the Cold War. His usage was a reference to the [[Third Estate]], the commoners of France who, before and during the [[French Revolution]], opposed priests and nobles, who composed the [[First Estate]] and [[Second Estate]], respectively. Sauvy wrote, "Like the third estate, the Third World is nothing, and wants to be something." He conveyed the concept of political [[Non-Aligned Movement|non-alignment]] with either the capitalist or communist bloc.
French demographer, anthropologist and historian [[Alfred Sauvy]], in an article published in the French magazine ''[[Le Nouvel Observateur|L'Observateur]]'', August 14, 1952, coined the term ''Third World'', referring to countries that were unaligned with either the Communist Soviet bloc or the Capitalist NATO bloc during the Cold War <ref name="Gregory">Gregory, Derek et al. (Eds.) (2009). Dictionary of Human Geography (5th Ed.), Wiley-Blackwell.</ref> His usage was a reference to the [[Third Estate]], the commoners of France who, before and during the [[French Revolution]], opposed priests and nobles, who composed the [[First Estate]] and [[Second Estate]], respectively. Sauvy wrote, "Like the third estate, the Third World is nothing, and wants to be something." He conveyed the concept of political [[Non-Aligned Movement|non-alignment]] with either the capitalist or communist bloc. <ref>Wolf-Phillips, Leslie (1987). "Why ‘Third World’?: Origin, Definition and Usage”, Third World Quarterly, 9(4): 1311-1327.</ref>


==Third World vs. Three Worlds==
==Third World vs. Three Worlds==
Line 22: Line 22:
[[Image:An abandoned MOGADISHU Street known as the Green Line, Jan 1993.JPEG|thumb|An abandoned [[Mogadishu]] street in 1993]]
[[Image:An abandoned MOGADISHU Street known as the Green Line, Jan 1993.JPEG|thumb|An abandoned [[Mogadishu]] street in 1993]]
A number of Third World countries were former colonies, and with the end of imperialism, many of these countries, especially the smaller ones, were faced with the challenges of nation- and institution-building on their own for the first time. Due to this common background, many of these nations were "developing" in economic terms for most of the 20th century, and many still are today. This term, when used today, generally denotes countries that have not "developed" to the same levels as [[OECD]] countries, and which are thus in the process of "developing".
A number of Third World countries were former colonies, and with the end of imperialism, many of these countries, especially the smaller ones, were faced with the challenges of nation- and institution-building on their own for the first time. Due to this common background, many of these nations were "developing" in economic terms for most of the 20th century, and many still are today. This term, when used today, generally denotes countries that have not "developed" to the same levels as [[OECD]] countries, and which are thus in the process of "developing".
In the 1980s, economist [[Peter Bauer]] offered a competing definition for the term ''Third World''. He claimed that the attachment of Third World status to a particular country was not based on any stable economic or political criteria, and was a mostly arbitrary process. The large diversity of countries that were considered to be part of the Third World, from Indonesia to Afghanistan, ranged widely from economically primitive to economically advanced and from politically non-aligned to Soviet- or Western-leaning.<ref>For example, Dr. [[Sergey Zagraevsky]] considers that Russia is moving to Third World [http://www.zagraevsky.com/third_rome_engl.htm], [http://www.zagraevsky.com/democracy_engl.htm]</ref> An argument could also be made for how parts of the U.S. are more like the Third World.<ref>[http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/14/third-world-america/ "Third World America"], ''MacLeans'', September 14, 2010</ref> The only characteristic that Bauer found common in all Third World countries was that their governments "demand and receive Western aid", the giving of which he strongly opposed. Thus, the aggregate term ''Third World'' was challenged as misleading even during the Cold War period.
In the 1980s, economist [[Peter Bauer]] offered a competing definition for the term ''Third World''. He claimed that the attachment of Third World status to a particular country was not based on any stable economic or political criteria, and was a mostly arbitrary process. The large diversity of countries that were considered to be part of the Third World, from Indonesia to Afghanistan, ranged widely from economically primitive to economically advanced and from politically non-aligned to Soviet- or Western-leaning.<ref>For example, Dr. [[Sergey Zagraevsky]] considers that Russia is moving to Third World [http://www.zagraevsky.com/third_rome_engl.htm], [http://www.zagraevsky.com/democracy_engl.htm]</ref> An argument could also be made for how parts of the U.S. are more like the Third World.<ref>[http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/14/third-world-america/ "Third World America"], ''MacLeans'', September 14, 2010</ref> The only characteristic that Bauer found common in all Third World countries was that their governments "demand and receive Western aid", the giving of which he strongly opposed. Thus, the aggregate term ''Third World'' was challenged as misleading even during the Cold War period because it had no consistent or collective identity among the countries it supposedly encompassed.


Recently the term ''Majority World'' has started to be used since most people of the world live in poorer and less developed countries.<ref>[http://www.newint.org/easier-english/Reference/northsouth.html "The 'North' and the 'South{{'"}}]</ref>
Recently the term ''Majority World'' has started to be used since most people of the world live in poorer and less developed countries.<ref>[http://www.newint.org/easier-english/Reference/northsouth.html "The 'North' and the 'South{{'"}}]</ref>

==Foreign Aid and Development==
During the Cold War, unaligned countries of the 'Third World' were seen as potential allies by both the First and Second World. Therefore, the United States and the Soviet Union went to great lengths to establish connections in these countries by offering economic and military support in order to gain strategically located alliances (eg. United States in Vietnam or Soviet Union in Cuba).<ref name="Tomlinson" /> By the end of the Cold War, many Third World countries had adopted capitalist or communist economic models and continued to receive support from the side they had chosen. Throughout the Cold War and beyond, the countries of the Third World have been the priority recipients of Western foreign aid and the focus of economic development through mainstream theories such as [[Modernization Theory]] and [[Dependency Theory]]. <ref name="Tomlinson" />

By the end of the 1960s, the idea of the Third World came to represent countries in Africa, Asia and Latin America that were considered underdeveloped by the West based on a variety of characteristics (low economic development, low life expectancy, high rates of poverty and disease, etc). <ref name="Gregory" /> These countries became the targets for aid and support from governments, NGOs and individuals from wealthier nations. Despite decades of receiving aid and experiencing different development models (which have had very little success), many Third World countries economies are still be dependent on developed countries and are deep in debt <ref>[http://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/third_world_countries.htm "First, Second and Third World"]</ref> There is now a growing debate about why Third World countries remain impoverished and underdeveloped after all this time. People are calling for reducing foreign aid (and therefore dependency) and utilizing different economic theories than the traditional mainstream theories from the West. <ref>Mehmet, Ozay, 1995. Westernizing the Third World (Chapter 1), Routledge</ref> Historically, development and aid have not accomplished the goals they were meant to and currently the global gap between the rich and poor is greater than ever.<ref name="Westra">Westra, Richard (2011). “Renewing Socialist Development in the Third World”, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 41(4): 519-543.</ref>

Over the last few decades, global population has largely been focused in Third World countries (which often have higher birth rates than Developed countries). As populations expand in poorer countries, people are flocking to cities in a extensive urban migration that is resulting in the creation of massive shanty towns and slums <ref name="Westra" />


==See also==
==See also==
Line 35: Line 42:
*[[Third World Socialism]]
*[[Third World Socialism]]
*[[Three Worlds Theory]]
*[[Three Worlds Theory]]
*[[Modernization Theory]]
*[[Dependency Theory]]


== Notes ==
== Notes ==

Revision as of 00:59, 4 February 2012

The "Three Worlds" of the Cold War (between 30 April and 24 June 1975)
  First World: Countries aligned with the Western Bloc (i.e., NATO and allies), led by the United States
  Second World: Countries aligned with the Eastern Bloc (i.e., Warsaw Pact, China, and allies), led by the Soviet Union
  Third World: The Non-Aligned Movement, led by India and Yugoslavia, and other neutral countries

The term Third World arose during the Cold War to define countries that remained non-aligned with either capitalism and NATO (which along with its allies represented the First World), or communism and the Soviet Union (which along with its allies represented the Second World). This definition provided a way of broadly categorizing the nations of the earth into three groups based on social, political, and economic divisions.

Due to the fact that many underdeveloped countries are in the Third World, a common stereotype has arisen to designate underdevelopment in anything as "Third World" in a pejorative way.[1][2] Over the last few decades, the term 'Third World' has been used interchangeably with the Global South and Developing Countries to describe poorer countries that have struggled to attain steady economic development. [3] The Third World has also been connected to the world economic division as 'periphery' countries in the world system that is dominated by the 'core' countries. [3] Due to the complex history of evolving meanings and contexts, there is no clear or agreed upon definition of the Third World and the term is now less popular than it was during the 1970s and 80s. [3]

Etymology

French demographer, anthropologist and historian Alfred Sauvy, in an article published in the French magazine L'Observateur, August 14, 1952, coined the term Third World, referring to countries that were unaligned with either the Communist Soviet bloc or the Capitalist NATO bloc during the Cold War [4] His usage was a reference to the Third Estate, the commoners of France who, before and during the French Revolution, opposed priests and nobles, who composed the First Estate and Second Estate, respectively. Sauvy wrote, "Like the third estate, the Third World is nothing, and wants to be something." He conveyed the concept of political non-alignment with either the capitalist or communist bloc. [5]

Third World vs. Three Worlds

The "Three Worlds Theory" developed by Mao Zedong is different from the Western theory of the Three Worlds or Third World. For example, in the Western theory, China and India belong respectively to the second and third worlds, but in Mao's theory both China and India are part of the Third Non-Aligned World.

Third Worldism

Third Worldism has been defined as "the idea, popular among Third World autocrats and many American and French leftists in the late 60s and 70s, that – contrary to orthodox Marxism's view that the Western working class would deliver the world from the tyranny of capital that ... Third World elites were the privileged historical actor."[6]

History

An abandoned Mogadishu street in 1993

A number of Third World countries were former colonies, and with the end of imperialism, many of these countries, especially the smaller ones, were faced with the challenges of nation- and institution-building on their own for the first time. Due to this common background, many of these nations were "developing" in economic terms for most of the 20th century, and many still are today. This term, when used today, generally denotes countries that have not "developed" to the same levels as OECD countries, and which are thus in the process of "developing". In the 1980s, economist Peter Bauer offered a competing definition for the term Third World. He claimed that the attachment of Third World status to a particular country was not based on any stable economic or political criteria, and was a mostly arbitrary process. The large diversity of countries that were considered to be part of the Third World, from Indonesia to Afghanistan, ranged widely from economically primitive to economically advanced and from politically non-aligned to Soviet- or Western-leaning.[7] An argument could also be made for how parts of the U.S. are more like the Third World.[8] The only characteristic that Bauer found common in all Third World countries was that their governments "demand and receive Western aid", the giving of which he strongly opposed. Thus, the aggregate term Third World was challenged as misleading even during the Cold War period because it had no consistent or collective identity among the countries it supposedly encompassed.

Recently the term Majority World has started to be used since most people of the world live in poorer and less developed countries.[9]

Foreign Aid and Development

During the Cold War, unaligned countries of the 'Third World' were seen as potential allies by both the First and Second World. Therefore, the United States and the Soviet Union went to great lengths to establish connections in these countries by offering economic and military support in order to gain strategically located alliances (eg. United States in Vietnam or Soviet Union in Cuba).[3] By the end of the Cold War, many Third World countries had adopted capitalist or communist economic models and continued to receive support from the side they had chosen. Throughout the Cold War and beyond, the countries of the Third World have been the priority recipients of Western foreign aid and the focus of economic development through mainstream theories such as Modernization Theory and Dependency Theory. [3]

By the end of the 1960s, the idea of the Third World came to represent countries in Africa, Asia and Latin America that were considered underdeveloped by the West based on a variety of characteristics (low economic development, low life expectancy, high rates of poverty and disease, etc). [4] These countries became the targets for aid and support from governments, NGOs and individuals from wealthier nations. Despite decades of receiving aid and experiencing different development models (which have had very little success), many Third World countries economies are still be dependent on developed countries and are deep in debt [10] There is now a growing debate about why Third World countries remain impoverished and underdeveloped after all this time. People are calling for reducing foreign aid (and therefore dependency) and utilizing different economic theories than the traditional mainstream theories from the West. [11] Historically, development and aid have not accomplished the goals they were meant to and currently the global gap between the rich and poor is greater than ever.[12]

Over the last few decades, global population has largely been focused in Third World countries (which often have higher birth rates than Developed countries). As populations expand in poorer countries, people are flocking to cities in a extensive urban migration that is resulting in the creation of massive shanty towns and slums [12]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Usage in a Canadian newspaper
  2. ^ Usage in the National Review
  3. ^ a b c d e Tomlinson, B.R. (2003). “What was the Third World”, Journal of Contemporary History, 38(2): 307-321.
  4. ^ a b Gregory, Derek et al. (Eds.) (2009). Dictionary of Human Geography (5th Ed.), Wiley-Blackwell.
  5. ^ Wolf-Phillips, Leslie (1987). "Why ‘Third World’?: Origin, Definition and Usage”, Third World Quarterly, 9(4): 1311-1327.
  6. ^ Pithouse, Richard (2005). Report Back from the Third World Network Meeting Accra, 2005. Centre for Civil Society : 1-6.
  7. ^ For example, Dr. Sergey Zagraevsky considers that Russia is moving to Third World [1], [2]
  8. ^ "Third World America", MacLeans, September 14, 2010
  9. ^ "The 'North' and the 'South'"
  10. ^ "First, Second and Third World"
  11. ^ Mehmet, Ozay, 1995. Westernizing the Third World (Chapter 1), Routledge
  12. ^ a b Westra, Richard (2011). “Renewing Socialist Development in the Third World”, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 41(4): 519-543.

Further reading

  • Aijaz Ahmad, In Theory: Classes, Nations, Literatures. (1992)
  • P. T. Bauer, Equality, the Third World, and Economic Delusion. (1981) ISBN 0-674-25986-6.
  • J. Cole, Development and Underdevelopment. (1987)
  • A. Escobar, Encountering Development. The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. (1995)
  • E. Hermassi, The Third World Reassessed. (1980)
  • A. R. Kasdan, The Third World: A New Focus for Development. (1973)
  • P. W. Porter and E. S. Sheppard, A World of Difference: Society, Nature, and Development. (1998)
  • H. A. Reitsma and J. M. Kleinpenning, The Third World in Perspective. (1985)
  • Alan Whaites, States in Development, UK Department for International Development. London (2007), *
  • A. Huffington, Third World America: How Our Politicians Are Abandoning the Middle Class and Betraying the American Dream. (2010)*
  • P. J. Buchanan, State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America. (2006)*

[3][dead link]