User talk:Shearonink

Personal Toolbox

TALK PAGE REF REFERENCE TALK PAGE SECTION {{reflist-talk}} TEAHOUSE INVITATION {{subst:Wikipedia:Teahouse/Invitation|sign=~~~~}} [http://tools.wmflabs.org/sigma/editorinteract.py Editor Interaction Utility] http://tools.wmflabs.org/sigma/editorinteract.py THOMAS JEFFERSON REFERENCING STYLE https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Thomas_Jefferson/Archive_39#Citations Talk:Thomas Jefferson/Archive 39#Citations <ref>[[#abc | Author name, 2000]], p.123</ref><--This is placed within the article text. {{cite book |last=Smith |first=Alex |title=book title |year=2000 |publisher=publisher name |ref=abc }}<--This is placed within the references. WIKIPEDIA ADVENTURE INVITE {{subst:Wikipedia:TWA/Invite|signature=~~~~}} how to search for thingys How to PM someone in IRC: /msg username message How to construct a Notes section: Look at Japanese battleship Musashi Keeping watch on this IP Keeping watch on this IP http://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/major-taylor-worcester-whirlwind-history-cycling Major Taylor etc {{talk archive}} {{subst:User:Shearonink/ref}} [[:Help:Cheatsheet]]->>Help:Cheatsheet {{subst:unsigned|user name or IP|date}}->>Unsigned MISSING SIGNATURE talkpage posts Wikipedia:External links/Perennial websites Useful links thingy(users' talkpages) Here are some useful links that should help you create your article: *[[Wikipedia:Your first article|Your first article]] *[[Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners|Referencing for beginners]] *[[Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)]] *[[WP:IRS|Reliable sources]] Hope this helps, EMERGENCY E-MAIL addresses: emergency@wikimedia.org legal@wikimedia.org trademarks@wikimedia.org Code on how to use editing toolbar == Adding references is easy == [[File:Wikipedia- Using Cite option from toolbar.jpg|thumb|450px|Just follow the steps 1, 2 and 3 as shown and fill in the details]] Here's how to [[WP:REFB|add references]] from [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] for the content you add to Wikipedia. This helps maintain our policy of [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability]]. Adding well formatted references is very easy to do. #While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a [[Help:Edit toolbar|toolbar]] which says "'''Cite'''". #Click on it. #Then click on "'''Templates'''" #Choose the most appropriate template and '''fill in as many details as you can'''. This will add a well formatted reference that is helpful in case the [[URL|website link]] becomes [[Wikipedia:Link rot|inactive]] later. You can read more about it on [[Help:Edit toolbar]] or see this video [[:File:RefTools.ogv]].<br /> Hope this helps, Code for DONE or YES(when answering an edit request) {{done}} or {{y}} How to Archive a talkpage http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Menstrual_cycle&diff=518800518&oldid=518766618 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Menstrual_cycle/Archive_index Shearonink/notes Shearonink - Master List of useful links User:SudoGhost/Sandboxes/Red BBC profile of Mr. Wales http://translate.google.com/translate?client=safari&hl=en&ie=UTF8&oe=UTF8&twu=1&u=http://www.cycling4fans.de/index.php%3Fid%3D5340 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Cate_Kennedy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacques_Derrida#Deconstruction http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacques_Derrida_on_deconstruction User:Chzz/help/sorttable Help:Wikitable List of battleships of Germany goodFL example for pro cyclists List http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_battleships_of_Germany Brown Dog affair USE THIS TEMPLATE FOR GA REVIEWs {{subst:GAList2}} it will give the following result... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Allie_Reynolds/GA1 User this for a GA Review Template like THIS GA Review that YOU did...remember? That subst does the trick... Causeway Bay Books disappearances http://blog.freenode.net/2008/04/registering-a-channel-on-freenode/ http://www.wikihow.com/Set-up-Your-Own-IRC-Channel-on-Freenode.Net [http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/uc?uc=Username User compare report] <small>''Auto-generated every hour.''</small> [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/editorinteract.html Editor interaction utility] Poetry slam https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DangerousPanda#Alternate_Account_Listing How to hat/answer an off-topic question at ref desks found here How to import a non-EU vehicle from the U.K. to Poland and register it in the Polish vehicular-traffic? {{hat|request for legal advice, please contact (whatever authorities). [[Wikipedia:General disclaimer]]}} I want to know about how to import a non-[[European Union|EU]] vehicle from the [[United Kingdom|UK]] to [[Poland]] and register it in the [[Poland|Polish]] vehicular-traffic? ((Off-topic text deleted)) :(Answer to the unsigned-OP) I am sure you can ask the [proper authorities for this issue] - they can provide you with all the information you need, or point you in the right direction. This is an encyclopaedia, not a law firm. ::I have closed this on the basis of [the statement above]. {{hab}} HOW TO CONVERT A TALK PAGE FROM ClueBot III to lowercase sigmabot III For an example look at: this edit on Chicbyaccident's talk page Used Template:MonthlyArchive It had been: <!--{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis |archiveprefix=User talk:Chicbyaccident/Archives/ |format=Y/F |age=2160 |archivebox=yes |box-advert=yes }}--> {{User:ClueBot III/Archive Box|advert=no}} {{User:MiszaBot/config | algo = old(90d) | archive = User talk:Chicbyaccident/Archives/%(year)d/%(monthname)s | archiveheader = {{Talkarchive}} }} REMOVED: {{User:ClueBot III/Archive Box|advert=no}} PUT IN: {{MonthlyArchive| root = User talk:Chicbyaccident/Archives}} NOW it is: <!--{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis |archiveprefix=User talk:Chicbyaccident/Archives/ |format=Y/F |age=2160 |archivebox=yes |box-advert=yes }}--> {{User:MiszaBot/config | algo = old(90d) | archive = User talk:Chicbyaccident/Archives/%(year)d/%(monthname)s | archiveheader = {{Talkarchive}} }} {{MonthlyArchive| root = User talk:Chicbyaccident/Archives}} If I want to have a Table of Contents without having to make the posts left be a 4, then put __TOC__ after the headers chuck haber(l) leo caesius Editor Interaction Utility File:New editor barnstar.png<-AWESOME new editor barnstar April 2005 phrasing in Grover Cleveland article hidden "sic" added to Pocahontas in November 2011: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pocahontas&diff=next&oldid=461029652 take a look at this from time to time: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log/Ardathekaraof To use WIKTIONARY inline linkage use an interwiki internal link. For example [[wikt:definition|]] produces definition. NPP stuff New Pages Feed IMAGES Centering Caption : Wikipedia:Extended_image_syntax To find out how old some accts are, search their archives TO QUOTE A POEM OR EPITAPH AS IT APPEARS IN THE ORIGINAL, use {{poemquote}} as in this section from Henrietta Lacks: Henrietta Lacks, August 1, 1920 - October 4, 1951  In loving memory of a phenomenal woman, wife and mother who touched the lives of many. Here lies Henrietta Lacks (HeLa). Her immortal  cells will continue to help mankind forever. Eternal Love and Admiration, From Your Family See Template:Poemquote for instructions. To COLLAPSE old stale outdated posts on an IP's Talkpage: Put THIS at the top of the talkpage->>{{Old IP warnings top|These previous Blocks & Warnings date from [month/year date] through [month/year date].}} Put THIS after the last warning you are hatting->>{{Old IP warnings bottom}} GA STUFF - about how to do a bundled citation WP:CITEBUNDLE GA review hmmmmm... Tony Ahn https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Death_march_marker_100.jpg How to do an anchor: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Andrew_Johnson&curid=1624&diff=757683330&oldid=757526489 ->>> WP:CITEBUNDLE for how to bundle citations references instead of having multiple listings Wikipedia:Triple Crown Talk:Colours (Ayumi Hamasaki album)/GA1...that GA Review...see this User:Beeblebrox/fuck off GAMessage ...<big>[[WP:GA|Wikipedia Good Article]]!!</big> https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:AbuseLog&wpSearchUser=173.72.240.236 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/173.72.240.236 BV 111 edits to one page in one day, 34 edits to another page on the same day, 117 edits to another page - same day... I just don't understand. Shearonink (talk) 04:07, 17 March 2017 (UTC) [1] Lincoln COPYVIO TOOL ->>> https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/ possible sock & master ->> https://tools.wmflabs.org/sigma/editorinteract.py?users=Kollauwanderer&users=Skeptiker&users=&startdate=&enddate=&ns=&server=enwiki https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spacetime&diff=prev&oldid=783231665 stigmatella aurantiaca "George Washington Reconsidered" edited by Don Higginbotham this & this Take another look at this deletion of content -> cycling deaths TEMPLATE EDITNOTICE HARVARD CITES HOW TO DO THIS EDITNOTICES STUFF @Shearonink: Edit notices are created in a pseudo-namespace at Template:Editnotices/Page/___. I've created Template:Editnotices/Page/Hyde Park Picture House for you --DannyS712 (talk) 05:46, 21 May 2019 (UTC) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghost_bike https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Community_response_to_the_Wikimedia_Foundation%27s_ban_of_Fram#Comments_from_Risker https://www.podiumcafe.com/book-corner/2018/1/31/16955058/paced-bicycle-racing-deaths Chief Mouser to the Cabinet Office deleted cyclists info separate sections since 2004 July 2010 version of 'List of professional cyclists who have died during a race' What this List looked like when I started cult of death around professional cycling, "Sport, History, and Heritage: Studies in Public Representation" stripped down URL for cite Google search for 'cycling memorials' All about the Bike "Cyclopedia: It's All about the Bike" URL for cite pages 234-237 By William Fotheringham mortality among french cyclists in the tour de france Sports Doping article I would love to read get a hold of arnie baker traumatic injuries in a masters club INternational pro riders deaths arnice baker article linkage to federations Notes The following NOTES on cycling List need to be sourced Notes 1, 7, 8, 10, 11, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 26, 27 1...<ref group = "Note">"Pacemakers" in this sense were [[Motor-paced racing#Pacing by motorcycle|motorcyclists]] who rode motorcycles as a team mate in front of and for specific professional cyclists. These motorized vehicles provided an additional boost of speed to the cyclists behind them via their slipstreams (as in Andrew Horman's ''Life in the Slipstream: The Legend of Bobby Walthour''.)</ref> 7...<ref group = "Note">There appears to be some confusion over the year of Taylor's death, reported in various [[WP:IRS|reliable sources]] as occurring in either 1903 or 1902. Any references to his death occurring in 1901 seem to be in error since he placed 3rd at the World Championships in 1902.</ref> 8...<ref group = "Note">The June 18 date seems to be the date of the accident. Dangla apparently lingered in a coma before dying of his injuries on June 24. ''See'' "ATHLETICS(Note by Amateur)".</ref> 10...<ref group ="Note">The accident took place on November 14, Brecy died on November 25 after lingering for 11 days.</ref> 11...<ref group = "Note">At least one commentator has a different date of death - 18 October 1908. See ''Opgevouwen op zijn fietsje de dood tegemoet ("Folded to death on his bike")''.</ref> 15...<ref group = "Note">Per ''Cycling Archives'', this race is also known as the "Inter Clubs Championship" and took place in Uccle, Belgium.</ref> 16...<ref group = "Note">When Walter Rutt (the former world champion) wrote to the "American Bicyclist and Motorcyclist(Volume 71)" published in 1950, he referred to this race not as the actual Six-Day Race but as a 'team race that was run before' it and that this team race was of a 'A Thousand Laps'(150 km) variety.</ref> 17...<ref group = "Note">There were two Berlin Six-Days run in 1951. Van Beek died while racing the March 1951 Berlin Six-Day and Mirke died during the December Six-Day.</ref> 18...<ref group = "Note">Metze's month of death is variously reported as being either in May(Velo Gotha) or in July.(www.cyclingarchives.com)</ref> 20...<ref group = "Note">Jim Taylor was a fellow cyclist riding in the Tour and was also hit by the bus that killed Mockridge.</ref> 21...<ref group = "Note">The circumstances surrounding Simpson's death were controversial. The autopsy report said that drugs (amphetamines) were found in his system but judged the cause of death as being a combination of heat-stroke, oxygen depletion and physical exertion. Notwithstanding the drugs in his system the temperature that day was at least 42 degrees Celsius and the fact that Tour officials limited riders to two bottles of water a day was most probably a contributing factor.</ref> 22...<ref group = "Note">Wilcockson refers to the race as "a kermesse race at Retié".</ref> 26...<ref group = "Note">Espinosa's accident occurred during a team time trial ("el Criterium de Fuenlabrada") for the Fuenlabrada race, not the race itself.</ref> 27...<ref group = "Note">The date of McLean's death is reported as both September 3 (The World almanac) and as "early today" September 9 or 10th (News from the Outside World).</ref> How to fix things at List of cycling... If you have time some feedback please I am thinking of nominating List of cyclists with a cycling-related death for FLC sometime this fall. I've never nominated a List for FL before so if you could take a quick look to see if there's anything obvious that jumps out as being WRONG it would be very helpful. Just for a reference, this is what the List looked like when I first happened upon it back in July 2010. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 21:36, 18 August 2019 (UTC) @Shearonink: points from a quick skim: "and since 1994 a number of professionals have been killed in accidents with motorized vehicles while training on public roads." - given that presumably this happened before 1994 as well, this reads strangely The "Cyclists who died due to a race" / "Professionals who died during training and other cycling related deaths" section titles are overly verbose, and duplicate the table headers The name field is sorting by first name, not last name- consider the {{sortname}} template The 85% text size thing is a bit odd; especially since for me usually the thing that's stretching the rows is the image, not too much text in the notes field You use "&" a lot in the notes, which should be written out Notes field is inconsistent on using full sentences, and whether or not fragments get a period at the end You're going to need to justify why the first section gets a table but the "not in a race" deaths don't Some of your notes seem to be trying to imply a source; you'd be better off just putting a reference in them (there's a couple ways, but easiest is to switch to using the {{efn}} template, and then you can just stick a ref tag in the note Some of your citations are wonky and I'd recommend looking through them all- e.g. "Møller, Pages 467-468", which should be "Møller, pp, 467–468" to start with but also needs the full book or whatever listed because you don't have a sources section for that to be referring to. Also e.g. "Der deutsche Radfahrer, 23. März 1937", which has the same issue plus a non-standard (and non-English) date format. --PresN 03:06, 19 August 2019 (UTC) Thanks, appreciate your comments. Have already corrected some of the issues, will work my way through the others as I can. Cheers, Shearonink (talk) 03:33, 19 August 2019 (UTC) Question re: the sorting by last names...does that mean all the 120+ names in the table will have to be converted from their present plain state into "sortable by last name"? For instance Will the plain name within its table cell of Pierre Froget have to be converted to {{sortname|Pierre|Froget}} (and so on...)? Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 07:12, 19 August 2019 (UTC) @Shearonink: Yes, it would- 120 is a lot, but it should be fairly quick if you just run down the list adding "{{sortname|" to the front, and then the pipe, and then the closing }}. --PresN 14:31, 19 August 2019 (UTC) Ah thanks - just wanted to make sure. I didn't used to be a coder of any stripe, so these types of things are not intuitive for me and I have to ask lots of questions to make sure I understand. Wanted to mention the actual different sections and the titles of the sections have been discussed on the talk page - here, here, and here - these latest versions are the best we could come up with at the time. I'll try to think of some better ideas and propose them on the talkpage. About the sort-name code...there are several names linked to their associated En.WP articles plus two names linked to German WP articles (Louis Mettling & Ernst Feja). If I run into issues getting the sort-coding to stick I will be coming back here and asking about how to do that. Thanks again, Shearonink (talk) 15:38, 19 August 2019 (UTC) I figured out the coding for the names without articles (and with!) but I am going to need an example of what to do for names that are linked to other Wikipedias - I'd like to take care of the coding myself, that's the only way I'll learn so if you know the right way to do the sortname thing for Louis Mettling ([[:de:Louis Mettling|Louis Mettling]]) & Ernst Feja ([[:de:Ernst Feja|Ernst Feja]]) that would be a big help. Thx, Shearonink (talk) 17:34, 19 August 2019 (UTC) The way sortname works in the backend is table cell wikitext that looks kind of like: | data-sort-value="Last, First" | First Last I personally prefer this way as it makes it clear that's what is going on underneath the hood, but it does add some duplication. In the case of foreign wikis, you might do something like the following, taking the above as inspiration, to work around not-great support in the template: | data-sort-value="Last, First" | {{ill|First Last|lang_code}}. {{ill}} for documentation of the template invoked there. --Izno (talk) 02:57, 20 August 2019 (UTC) Yes, so, where you have | scope="row" style="text-align:center;"| [[:de:Louis Mettling|Louis Mettling]] || Track cyclist, change it to | scope="row" style="text-align:center;" data-sort-value="Mettling, Louis"| [[:de:Louis Mettling|Louis Mettling]] || Track cyclist (or | scope="row" style="text-align:center;" data-sort-value="Mettling, Louis"| {{ill|Louis Mettling|de}} || Track cyclist, per Izno's suggestion. --PresN 04:47, 20 August 2019 (UTC) Yay! Worked like a charm - thanks everybody. Shearonink (talk) 14:42, 20 August 2019 (UTC) Ok, now I have another sortname question... the entry now reads | scope="row" style="text-align:center;"| {{nowrap|Camille Danguillaume}}|| How do I use the sortname on this entry and maintain the nowrap for the name in the visible table? Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 14:56, 20 August 2019 (UTC) @Shearonink: Easiest way: Help:Table#Nowrap: "To keep an entire column from wrapping, use style="white-space: nowrap;" in a non-header cell on the longest/widest cell to affect the entire column." Looks like it also works to just make the nowrap template be on the outside of the sortname template: {{nowrap|{{sortname|Camille|Danguillaume}}}} --PresN 15:12, 20 August 2019 (UTC) Finished all the 120+ sortnames. Thanks for all your help everyone - cheers! Shearonink (talk) 16:45, 20 August 2019 (UTC) PresN - I think I've fixed many of the issues you pointed out. "and since 1994 a number of professionals have been killed in accidents with motorized vehicles while training on public roads." - given that presumably this happened before 1994 as well, this reads strangely. Edited this section, adjusted the wording The "Cyclists who died due to a race" / "Professionals who died during training and other cycling related deaths" section titles are overly verbose, and duplicate the table headers. Adjusted this wording The name field is sorting by first name, not last name- consider the {{sortname}} template. Yeah. This is SO fixed. The 85% text size thing is a bit odd; especially since for me usually the thing that's stretching the rows is the image, not too much text in the notes field. Bumped up to 95% You use "&" a lot in the notes, which should be written out. I think I've fixed most of these. Notes field is inconsistent on using full sentences, and whether or not fragments get a period at the end. -->> Still working on this. You're going to need to justify why the first section gets a table but the "not in a race" deaths don't. -->> I've been thinking about this. Some of your notes seem to be trying to imply a source; you'd be better off just putting a reference in them (there's a couple ways, but easiest is to switch to using the {{efn}} template, and then you can just stick a ref tag in the note -->> Still working on this. Some of your citations are wonky and I'd recommend looking through them all- e.g. "Møller, Pages 467-468", which should be "Møller, pp, 467–468" to start with but also needs the full book or whatever listed because you don't have a sources section for that to be referring to. Also e.g. "Der deutsche Radfahrer, 23. März 1937", which has the same issue plus a non-standard (and non-English) date format. -- -->> Still working on this. Just waiting on some additional info from a collaborator with access to early 20th Century German-language references (hoping for some photos of some of the early cyclists, plus some specific referencing. If there's anything else that screams WRONG in the present version, please let me know. Thanks again, really appreciate all the help. Shearonink (talk) 21:51, 20 August 2019 (UTC) How to get at the URL info in an Introduction to a book, with pages that are roman numerals https://books.google.com/books?id=0-IUC00guXEC&pg=PR17#v=onepage&q&f=false mLive article about Bath School disaster PHOTOS from MICHIGAN (STATE?) HISTORICAL ARCHIVES 22 things you may not have known about the 1927 Bath school massacre by Julie Mack | jmack1@mlive.com article dated May 10, 2017 April 2019 article Revisiting the 1927 Bath School Disaster https://federalcourthistoricaledmi.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/201302-Court-Legacy-February-2013.pdf A modern analysis of a historical pediatric disaster: the 1927 Bath school bombing https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20471035 Okemos High School Alumni Website Write-up about Bath, lots of sources: http://www.okemosalumni.org/000/4/8/8/29884/userfiles/file/The%20Story%20of%20Bath%20by%20Sherrie%20Paty%20%2766%20edited.pdf Pertinent links for BSD FAC WP:Media copyright questions Discussion on Nikkimaria's talk page Discussion on Sandy Georgia's talk page Review on Talk:Bath School disaster Pre-FAC comments Bath School disaster TFA nom worksheet {{subst:TFAR nom | article = {{subst:Bath School disaster}} | blurb = The '''Bath School disaster''' was a series of violent attacks perpetrated by [[Andrew Kehoe]] on May{{nbs}}18, 1927, in [[Bath Township, Michigan]]. The attacks killed 38 [[elementary school]]children and 6 adults, and injured at least 58 other people. On the morning of May 18 - having previously murdered his wife at their farm - Kehoe set off almost simultaneous explosions at his home and at the Bath Consolidated School. His explosives destroyed the farm's buildings and ripped through the north wing of the Bath Consolidated School building. As rescuers began working at the school, Kehoe drove up to the schoolyard and detonated [[dynamite]] inside his [[Fragmentation (weaponry)|shrapnel]]-filled truck. The truck explosion killed Kehoe and several bystanders. During the rescue and recovery efforts, searchers discovered an additional 500 [[Pound (mass)|pounds]] (230 kg) of unexploded dynamite and [[pyrotol]] in the south wing of the school that was set to explode at the same time as the initial explosions in the north wing; Kehoe had apparently intended to destroy the entire school and kill everyone in it. | image = Bath School disaster showing front of school.png | caption = Front view of the Bath School building after the bombing | promoted = March 29, 2020 | editors = {{u|Shearonink}} | recents = No recent similar articles that I could find | reasons = The anniversary date of the disaster is May 18. This is my first FA, so it would be my first FA to appear at TFA }} ADDITIONAL SOURCE FOR list of cylists: https://books.google.com/books?id=o3OuBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA67#v=onepage&q&f=false SJW worksheet https://fee.org/articles/how-the-term-social-justice-warrior-became-an-insult/ https://www.flowjournal.org/2018/04/alt-right-bogeyman/ https://indigo.uic.edu/articles/Attack_of_the_50-foot_social_justice_warrior_the_discursive_construction_of_SJW_memes_as_the_monstrous_feminine/10766381/1 https://www.washingtonian.com/2019/05/05/what-happened-after-my-13-year-old-son-joined-the-alt-right/ https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14680777.2018.1447333?scroll=top&needAccess=true https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Far_Right_in_Contemporary_Australia/79KiDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=social+justice+warrior+gamergate+conservative&pg=PA133&printsec=frontcover https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/josephbernstein/lane-davis-ralph-retort-seattle4truth-alt-right Cycling stuff https://stuyfssportverhalen.com/?tag=fatal-accidents-in-cycling WORD COUNT Word Count tool ->>> http://www.javascriptkit.com/script/script2/charcount.shtml BRILLIANT Newslinger I have no interest in going in circles, we can look at policy. WP:CONTEXTMATTERS suggests to me that a RS's in house legal department making clarifications about the nature of their own content would be a reliable source in the context of the content in question. Can you think of a better source for whether or not something an RS said is an opinion or a fact, than a RS's own in house legal dept explicitly answering that, given that the issue of fact vs opinion is a significant aspect of law?Sandman9083 (talk) 22:20, 17 November 2020 (UTC) That's an incorrect application of WP:CONTEXTMATTERS. The correct application is to recognize that although The New York Times (RSP entry) is generally reliable, statements made by its legal counsel (not its journalists) are unreliable because they are similar to press releases and "lack meaningful editorial oversight, or have an apparent conflict of interest", as described in the questionable sources policy. It is fruitless to use a questionable source to attempt to discredit high-quality academic sources. Since the consensus of factual coverage in reliable sources, including academic sources and news coverage, is that Project Veritas edited videos to mislead its viewers, that is a factual claim, and not an opinion. The vast majority of editors on this talk page have found your arguments unconvincing, and your best course of action would be to – as you say – "take a step back", respect the consensus here, and refrain from bludgeoning the process any further. — Newslinger talk 01:44, 18 November 2020 (UTC) I want to add a time-stamp to a subst thingy I made a while ago but (From Wikipedia:Village pump (technical), see this edit as pertains to User:Shearonink/Holiday Here's the page: User:Shearonink/Holiday. I created this "Card" 3 years ago but was looking at it today prior to starting to send it out and I realized - eek! - that there is no time-stamp. I am somewhat tech-averse, so I do not understand how to add a time-stamp (heh, or even if it is possible). If some of you tech experts could take a look at the code and tell me how to fix it I'd appreciate that. PLEASE do not go ahead and just fix it yourself. I know that is probably easier but if I don't do it myself in the future I won't understand how to fix similar situations. Thanks & Cheers! Shearonink (talk) 19:11, 15 December 2020 (UTC) @Shearonink: I'm assuming you are going to subst: this places, if so you can add a line that is something like this: ~~<noinclude></noinclude>~~<noinclude></noinclude>~. There are other ways too, but that should be easy to understand (test it in your sandbox). — xaosflux Talk 19:19, 15 December 2020 (UTC) Oh my word Xaosflux, I knew someone around here would have the answer. THANK YOU, you are awesome, I will start testing away! Cheers! Shearonink (talk) 20:13, 15 December 2020 (UTC) @Shearonink: Three tildes (~~<noinclude></noinclude>~) give you your signature without timestamp: — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) Four tildes (~~<noinclude></noinclude>~~) give you your signature with timestamp (as usual): — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 00:04, 16 December 2020 (UTC) Five tildes (~~<noinclude></noinclude>~~<noinclude></noinclude>~) give you a timestamp without signature (as Xaosflux showed): 00:04, 16 December 2020 (UTC) The noinclude code prevents the tildes from being parsed unless the page is substituted. There's also interesting stuff on mw:Help:Magic words but you probably won't need it for now: {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>CURRENTMONTHNAME}} is here and {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>CURRENTYEAR}} was very.. special? Greetings from {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>REVISIONUSER}}. December is here and 2020 was very.. special? Greetings from Alexis Jazz. But maybe if you want to customize stuff. Here the "includeonly" will result in the magic words being substituted when you substitute the page, but not when saving the page. (because the substitution happens only when the page is included on another page) — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 00:04, 16 December 2020 (UTC) @Shearonink: Instead of "the New Year 2021 will be an improvement upon the old of 2020" you could say "the New Year '''{{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>#expr: {{CURRENTYEAR}} + 1 }}''' will be an improvement upon the old of {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>CURRENTYEAR}}" as 1 + 1 is 2. Or with an exception for January (for slightly late wishes for a good new year), it could be written as "the New Year '''{{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>#ifeq:{{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>CURRENTMONTH}}|01|{{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>CURRENTYEAR}}|{{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>#expr: {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>CURRENTYEAR}} + 1 }}}}''' will be an improvement upon the old of {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>#ifeq:{{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>CURRENTMONTH}}|01|{{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>#expr: {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>CURRENTYEAR}} - 1 }}|{{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>CURRENTYEAR}}}}". Sure it's easier to just update it manually every year, but your card could live on forever! — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 14:10, 16 December 2020 (UTC) Sources for Box Office Poison In New York column (by George Ross), Salinas Morning Post, May 21, 1928, Page 4, Newspapers.com San Francisco Examiner, May 5, 1938, Page 10, Newspapers.com Filter thingy https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:AbuseLog&wpSearchFilter=1120 (..sneed->chuck) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseFilter/1120 Harv errors stuff User Scripts archive page Interesting editor interaction COPYRIGHT Earwig Copyvio Tool https://copyvios.toolforge.org/ Zapruder book ebook linkage Done Checkmark {{done}} SHORT DESCRIPTION SHORT DESC So, your Wikipedia:Shortdesc helper edits... I noticed that you're adjusting and fixing up a lot of short descriptions using Wikipedia:Shortdesc helper. How do you find all these articles to fix up? Is there an automated process or do you just start looking in general at Wikipedia articles? Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 14:51, 19 April 2022 (UTC) @Shearonink: I monitor categories such as Category:Pages_using_short_description_with_unknown_parameters, Category:Pages with lower-case short description and Category:Articles with long short description which report "errors". Also, whenever I have time, I pick pages at random from Search for articles without a short description (skipping DAB pages). See also my Tidying page — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 15:23, 19 April 2022 (UTC) Ah thanks, appreciate the info. Shearonink (talk) 15:52, 19 April 2022 (UTC) Arranged by Montrose Arranged by Montrose - is this article correct? it is very confusing... Andrew Jackson... Was wondering myself about the "and Jackson received schooling from two nearby priests" (especially that "nearby priests" part...) so I went hunting for when it was added to the article. It's been present in the Jackson article since April 2017 when it was added with this edit [2]. Does Wilentz's 2005 biography say *anything* specifically about Jackson's early schooling? If he did that could certainly be of interest... The text & source are as follows: Jackson's father died in an accident in February 1767 at the age of 29, three weeks before his son Andrew was born in the Waxhaws area. Jackson, his mother, and his brothers lived with Jackson's aunt and uncle in the Waxhaws region, and Jackson received schooling from two nearby priests. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 20:34, 17 May 2022 (UTC) The "two priests" part jumped out at me, too. Obviously that edit was made by a child or an ignoramus with no concept of the time and the place where Jackson grew up. In a small, tightly-knit, very Presbyterian community, sending a child to two priests - presumably Catholic - would have been like sending him to the devil. I followed the link within the source link to the Wilentz biography, which on page 16 says the young Jackson was sent to two clergymen - a very different thing! In the following paragraph, however, Wilentz says he was sent to a "religious academy" but does not name it or say where it was. On page 177, a timeline of "Milestones" gives the names of two men who ran schools (plural) that Jackson attended in 1775-1780. It is not certain that these are the two clergymen mentioned before. All this was too vague and nebulous for me, so I simply deleted the false claim. If you'd like to take the time to stitch these fragments into the wikiarticle, by all means go ahead. I was just there to find out his birth and death dates, really. Thanks for taking an interest. Textorus (talk) 02:36, 18 May 2022 (UTC) I didn't see this nifty little reply link until I'd already replied to you on my talk page. Please take a look over there. Textorus (talk) 02:40, 18 May 2022 (UTC) Yeah, re the "priests" - made no sense. I do not have access to the Wilentz book. Can you put the names of those two men here? I can see if I can figure out if those guys are the two clergymen or not...little puzzles fascinate me lol, maybe I'll stitch it all back in at some point. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 14:59, 18 May 2022 (UTC) The link within a link is footnote 9 in paragraph 2 of the Early life section, but I'll save you a step: just go to https://books.google.com/books?id=1GhZl6KhM4cC&pg=PP8. Textorus (talk) 17:34, 18 May 2022 (UTC) Thanks for the link. Actually Wilentz isn't much help at all on the specifics but at least I have found some names in other sources (TG we get jstor access around here now) - in Vol. 7, No. 1, MARCH, 1948 Tennessee Historical Quarterly... James White Stephenson(school on the Catabaw, prominent Pres. clergyman), Professor Branch, Dr./Mr. William Humphries (school at Waxhaw Church), Reverend Francis Cummins (prominent Pres. clergyman, classical boarding school), Robert M'Culloch (Jackson's last school studies occurred with a Mr. M'Culloch in an area of North Carolina called "the New Acquisition", happened after Jackson returned home after the Rev War and before he studied law - source The Complete Memoirs of Andrew Jackson: Seventh President of the United States : Containing a Full Account of His Military Life and Achievements, with His Career as President by John Henry Eaton, 1878 Edition). Shearonink (talk) 18:35, 18 May 2022 (UTC) Surveying article ideas and references etc. John Savage (surveyor) Fairfax Line - https://books.google.com/books?id=2iMSAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false Fairfax Stone Historical Monument State Park Professional Surveyor Magazine, Professional Surveyor April 2004 Volume 24 Number 4 History Corner: Robert Brooke, Father and Son, Surveyors of Virginia Mary M. Root, LS Penn–Calvert boundary dispute Wikidata stuff https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1090177 That supposed "Theodore" Jackson?...HAHAHAHAHAH ACTUAL November 1813 LETTER that Brands slightly misquotes... Page 444 CITATION - The Papers of Andrew Jackson, V. II, 1804-1813. Ed. Harold D. Moser and Sharon Macpherson. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1984. To Rachel Jackson Head quarters 10 Islands Cosa river Novbr. 4th. 1813 In the hurry of the moment I have but a moment to write you-I detached Genl John Coffee with part of his Brigade of Cavalry and mounted men to destroy the Creek Town Talus,hatchey, [1] he has executed this order in elegant stile leaving dead on the field one hundred & seventy six, and taking 80, prisoners, forty prisoners was left on the ground many of them wounded, others to take care of them-since writing the above Genl Coffee reports 1 80, found dead, and there is no doubt but 200 was killed [2] -I have here forty two added to the thirty two heretofore captured & sent on to Huntsville, in all 74-1 have been and is still badly supplied with provisions, as soon as I can get a supply will proceed on to the heart of the creek nation-Mr Alexander and Jack Donelson [3] were both in the action are safe & behaved like what I could wish & expected, all friends safe, Capt Hammond had 5 of his men wounded-all behaved bravely and as I could wish-I send on a little Indian boy[4] for Andrew to Huntsville-with a request to Colo. Pope to take care of him untill he is sent on-all his family is destroyed-he is about the age of Theodore [5] -In haste your affectionate Husband Andrew Jackson ALS, MH-H. 1. See AJ to John Coffee, November 2. 2. Coffee's losses were five killed and forty-one wounded. The victory at Tallushatchee was the first major blow to the hostile Creeks in upper Mississippi Territory. For details of the battle, see Coffee to AJ, November 4. 3. John ("Jack") Donelson (1787-1840), brother of Alexander, was a lieutenant in Coffee's cavalry brigade and commanded a company of mounted infantry at the Battle of New Orleans. In 1823 he married Edward Butler's daughter, Eliza, and settled near Florence, Ala. 4. Lyncoya (c1813-28), a Creek infant orphaned at the Battle of Tallushatchee, reached the Hermitage in May 1814. He remained in the Jackson household until his death. 5. Theodore (cl813-14) was probably another Indian child at the Hermitage. Jackson and Rachel mentioned his death in their letters of March 4 and 21, 1814 (DLC). THIS^^^letter is about LYNCOYA. Incorrect assertion not backed up by sources added here on January 20, 2012 by User:Rockgenre Revision as of 21:00, 20 January 2012 (edit) (undo) (thank) Rockgenre (talk | contribs) ->edit summary->(Jackson actually had another adopted American Indian son named Theodore.) The ACTUAL TEXT DOES NOT SAY THAT THEODORE WAS ADOPTED, the WP-editor mis-characterizes the source, the actual letter is above, Brands MISQUOTES Jackson and leaves a slight impression that this "Theodore" is somehow adopted. BRANDS says: "I send on a little boy for Andrew. All his family is destroyed. He is about the age of Theodore." but Brands then goes on to say: The young boy named Theodore had come to live at the Hermitage earlier, under circumstances lost to history. ... In Jackson's case, he pitied the Creek child—named Lyncoya—but he also wanted to provide Rachel another child and Andrew (and Theodore) a brother. All of the above is found on Page 198 of Brands' Andrew Jackson: His Life and Times. FEBRUARY 21st 1814 letter Page 35 To Rachel from Jackson say to my little darling Andrew, that his sweet papa will be home shortly, and that he sends him three sweet kisses-I have not heard whether Genl Coffee has taken on to him little Lyncoya-1 have got another Pett-given to me by the chief Jame Fife, that I intend for my other little Andrew [Jackson] Donelson and if I can a third I will give it to little Andrew [Jackson] Hutchings [2] My love I write you as often as time and convayences will permit, and I have a pleasing hope we will with the protection and permission of him who governs all, meet shortly-I wrote you a few days since, requesting you would send the copy of the secratary of wars letter and the copy I had enclosed to Genl Coffee of general Pinckneys letter which I directed to be sent on with my letter to you-To William B Lewis at Nashville 3-If you have not please to do it on the receipt of this, give my compliments to all friends and believe me affectionately yours, &c &c Andrew Jackson ALS, MoSHi (3-0883). 2. Donelson (1799-1871) and Hutchings (1811-41) were, respectively, Jackson's nephew and grandnephew. Hutchings became Jackson's ward after his father, John Hutchings, died in 1817. The Indian children were probably Theodore and Charley. 3. See AJ to Rachel Jackson, February 17, and, above, AJ to Coffee, February 17. “There Was Somebody Always Dying and Leaving Jackson as Guardian”: The Wards of Andrew Jackson by Rachel Meredith A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in History, with Concentration in Public History Middle Tennessee State University May 2013 Thesis Committee: Dr. Rebecca Conard, Chair Dr. Mary Hoffschwelle https://jewlscholar.mtsu.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/443f7089-2583-469f-9f7e-543c01037223/content https://web.archive.org/web/20220524065354/https://jewlscholar.mtsu.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/443f7089-2583-469f-9f7e-543c01037223/content Page 44 Charley was a Creek Indian child whom Jackson received from James Fife, and gave to Andrew Jr. in 1814. Page 44-45 There is also evidence that another Indian child was already residing at the Hermitage when Lyncoya arrived. This child, Theodore, is briefly mentioned in a few letters. When Jackson was estimating Lyncoya’s age to Rachel, he said that he was about Theodore’s age. It is unclear what happened to Charley and Theodore. Personally, sounds like a recipe for disaster. Lyncoya was a small child, no one knows exactly how old but maybe a toddler and Andrea jackson jr was born in 1809 so Jr was around 5 or 6 when Lyncoya showed up...a 5 or 6 year old expected to have a baby/toddler as a companion/friend? An aside...odd to me that Jackson called them "petts" in his letters. James Fife aka Tuskena Hutka (Page 21, Volume III, Footnote by Editors) was a Creek allied with Jackson who gave Jackson another native child, Charly/Charley (Junior refers to "Charly" in his letter to his father dated APRIL 8, 1814 Lyncoya wasn't there until after April 1814, per page 60, Volume III Charley/Charly was already there, he had arrived before Lyncoya, per page 60 Volume III, letter from Junior to Jackson charly/charley was given to Jackson from James Fifrean indian guide or chief Page 59 of Volume III, Rachel's letter to Jackson, dated April 7, 1814, says your Little Andrew is well Is much pleased with his Charley CITATION: The Papers of Andrew Jackson, Vol. III, 1814-1815. Ed. Harold D. Moser, David R. Hoth, Sharon Macpherson, John H. Reinbold. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1991, page 59, Page 60 CHARLY/CHARLEY PAGE 60, VOLUME III From Andrew Jackson, Jr. Aprile the 8 [18 14] My Dear Father no one will fetch my Lyncoia I have a thought of going my self for him I like Charly but he will not mind me my mother thinks highly of his understanding she treats him as well as aney purson on Earth Could-write when you think you will be on your returne march and I will Come and Hail you welcome oh the Sweete anticipation of the Long wished for period of it oreflows my soule I must quit the subject for the present-adieue my kindest and Dearest of friends Andrew Jackson j uner THEODORE was already there before Lyncoya, per Jackson's letter to Rachel, Page 444 Volume II. VOLUME III, 1814-1815:https://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1004&context=utk_jackson VOLUME II, 1804-1813:https://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=utk_jackson https://books.google.com/books?id=_Z0nDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA91&lpg=PA91 The Native South: New Histories and Enduring Legacies, edited by Tim Alan Garrison & Greg O'Brien, 2017, Chapter 5 - Andrew Jackson's Indian Son: Native Captives and American Empire by Christina Snyder https://history.la.psu.edu/directory/christina-snyder/ PhD, McCabe Greer Professor of the American Civil War Era at PennState, extensively published books, articles, essays http://npshistory.com/publications/hobe/braund-2017.pdf - bibliography, mentions: December 29, 1813. Andrew Jackson to Rachel Jackson. In this letter, Jackson inquires if Lyncoya, (the infant taken at Tallushatchee) had arrived at the Hermitage and instructs his wife to "Keep Lyncoya in the house," an indication that Jackson did not want him housed with his African American slaves. (2:516) VOLUME III To Rachel Jackson Head quarters Fort Strother Decbr 29th. 1813 . ½ past 11 oclock at night Please write me how my little andrew [is] and whether, his little Indian Lyncoya was taken to him by Major Whyte 3 of Gallatine-if he has got him how & what he thinks of him-Keep Lyncoya in the house-h NPS: http://npshistory.com/publications/hobe/braund-2017.pdf The African American Experience and the Creek War, 1813-14: An Annotated Bibliography Task Agreement NumberP16AC01696 Under Cooperative Agreement Number P13AC00443 Between The United States Dept. of the Interior, National Park Service Horseshoe Bend National Military Park and Auburn University August 8, 2017 Report Prepared By Kathryn H. Braund Hollifield Professor of Southern History Auburn University New/different resource for Bath School article UGA PhD dissertation 2019 & wayback saved version MERGE How to do an article merge - from MelanieN's user talk ...Need some advice/help re: a merge or a re-direct or....? between Bath School disaster & Bath Consolidated School... As an admin who has edited "Bath School disaster", I need some advice re: Wiki-procedures... In May a "merge from" template was placed at Bath School disaster to merge content from Bath Consolidated School into the main article. The discussion so far at Talk:Bath School disaster#Proposed merge of Bath Consolidated School into Bath School disaster has been all in favor. I don't disagree with the template but... In looking over the School article it seems that there is nothing much there different from the main article so a true merge doesn't seem necessary. I've suggested a redirect but am not sure how to best accomplish it (for instance, I don't want to mistakenly strand the Consolidated School's talk page and so on). If you could take a look under the hood and mentor me through the process I'd be happy to take care of it. Yeah, I know it's kind of crazy that I don't know how to do it already but I'm like a cross between toddler around WP, yelling "ME DO!" while simultaneously being afraid I'll Wiki-break something in the process. (FYI - I've also asked for help from one other experienced editor who edited the article somewhat semi-recently on their talk page, figuring maybe one of you will be able to respond shortly with advice.) Cheers, Shearonink (talk) 16:19, 4 June 2022 (UTC) Hello, Shearonink, and thanks for the note. I took a look at the Merge Request and posted a comment agreeing that such a merge should be carried out. I will be happy to advise you how to do it. You will be able to carry it out in full; there is nothing there that calls for admin tools. And you don't strike me as a toddler, with your long experience here! You could look at this advice for help. Also see Wikipedia:WikiProject Merge. Basically, here is what I advise: First, look at the information at the school article and compare it to the information about the school at the disaster article. If there is any significant information missing, copy it and any supporting references into the disaster article, and note in your edit summary that the information is copied from the school article. The format I use for the edit summary is something like this: "Material copied from Bath Consolidated School, see that article's history for attribution." Next, replace the entire content of the school article with a redirect notice to Bath School disaster, and add the template {{Template:R from merge}}. In your edit summary mention/link to the merge discussion. Then go to the school article's talk page, and replace the entire content with a redirect notice to Talk:Bath School disaster and template as above, and mention the merge discussion in your edit summary. Remove the "merge to" template from the disaster article, and comment at the Merge Request discussion that you have carried out the merge. The existing Pending Change protection at the disaster article will remain in place. Have fun! I'm not going to be around for the next 24 hours so if you get stuck, consult the other person! 0;-D -- MelanieN (talk) 17:49, 4 June 2022 (UTC) Thank you for all this advice. I'm going to take a stab at it now...wish me luck! Shearonink (talk) 18:12, 4 June 2022 (UTC)  Done Feel free to check it all out, I don't think there are any dangling bits of code or orphaned pages... Thanks again. I must say, for me it was much easier to follow your step-by-steps than some of the "Help" pages. Shearonink (talk) 22:09, 4 June 2022 (UTC) Nice work, Shearonink. Just one thing: although you added the appropriate template to the talk page and left the wikiprojects in place, you forgot to actually redirect the school talk page to the disaster talk page. I did that just now, although to tell you the truth I don't know if it is actually required. I just don't like to leave the talk page of a redirect behind; seems like kind of an orphan. -- MelanieN (talk) 23:57, 5 June 2022 (UTC) Ah...yeah, I wasn't sure if the School old talk page had to leave. Or not. Thanks for the clean-up on Aisle 5. Shearonink (talk) 02:11, 6 June 2022 (UTC) To look under the hood at how this all turned out: See Bath School disaster edit See edit history and Talk:Bath Consolidated School See edit history and Bath Consolidated School Headrights Surveying Virginia Review: Headrights and Head Counts: A Review Article Reviewed Work: White, Red, and Black: The Seventeenth-Century Virginian by Wesley Frank Craven Review by: Edmund S. Morgan 30 kb Drive https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Vital_Articles/30_kB_drive HOW TO TURN OFF VECTOR 2022 See HOW TO TURN OFF NEW SKIN How to turn off the new skin You can turn off the Vector 2022 skin in two ways: From the left menu (sidebar), select the link “Switch to old look”, then select your preferred alternate skin (note: the previous default skin was Vector legacy) Open the user menu from the button at the top right corner of the page, then select preferences. Go to the appearance tab on the preferences page and scroll to the Skin section on the preferences page Another way to do linkage for articles * {{slink|Lost Cause of the Confederacy|Song of the South}} gives the reader this instead of * [[Lost Cause of the Confederacy#Song of the South]] + this. Bot adds publication dates to undated material Status new bug Reported by Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes 21:17, 27 January 2023 (UTC) What happens The bot's been adding and populating a date= parameter for sources with no listed publication date. There is no indication as to where the bot gets these dates from and no reason to think that they're accurate. What should happen The bot shouldn't add a publication date for sources that don't have one listed. Relevant diffs/links [3], [4] We can't proceed until Feedback from maintainers These dates are stated in the web pages' HTML. You can check with Ctrl-U or other method to view source in your browser. Nemo 21:29, 27 January 2023 (UTC) The first one is coming from one of the items in the HTML source (Ctrl + U in Firefox): <meta property="og:updated_time" content="2019-06-17T16:47:08-04:00" /> <meta property="article:published_time" content="2018-07-17T11:12:23-04:00" /> <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2019-06-17T16:47:08-04:00" /> <meta name="dcterms.date" content="2018-07-17T11:12-04:00" /> The second one has similar: <meta property="article:published_time" content="2017-01-25T14:57:52-05:00" /> <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2022-05-04T10:25:57-04:00" /> (The bot should probably prefer the modified_time/updated_time if it is the source responsible, and if it's getting it from Citoid or other ext service maybe an upstream notification would be valuable.) This metadata is deliberately in that location for the purpose of bots and other systems. Izno (talk) 21:31, 27 January 2023 (UTC) Hmmm. Well, this is interesting to me. Chiming in here as the person who originally added the cites to these articles. The dates that the Bot is adding to the cites would appear to be incorrect in that they are not published on the page with the source material. Also, the date that the Bot is finding would appear to be the date that the material was published onto the web but it might not be the actual date the material was written or the date that the material was published in print. In the case of the Archipedia material on the Ramsdell, that information seems to have originally been published in print in 2012. In any case, is a researcher/WP-editor expected or supposed to always to look up the html dates if material is undated on the page? Shearonink (talk) 16:57, 28 January 2023 (UTC) I usually check the date in the HTML if it's not stated, but one can be forgiven for not doing so. The date in {{cite web}} is usually the date of the web page itself. If the date of original publication of the work carried by the web page has some significance, you can instead use {{cite publication}} or other cite template with the date of the work, indicating that the URL is just one representation. For the sake of WP:RS, I'd expect editors to know whether they're citing a website or some publication of which the website provides a copy, and ideally they'd use citation templates accordingly, but such details can be addressed if/when confusion arises. Nemo 17:21, 28 January 2023 (UTC) I try to be SO scrupulous and careful when citing whatever reference... Does that "Control-U" thingy work with all laptops? (Yay yet another parameter to remember when info or a webpage "appears" to be undated...) I'd never heard about being able to see the date in the html before. Is it something that only works with PCs or Macs/whatever?... Shearonink (talk) 17:42, 28 January 2023 (UTC) On Windows in Firefox: Ctrl + U is how Firefox does it. It should work in other browsers but the specific key combo may be different. A second way: if you right-click on a page, also provides "View page source". The third way is to open console, which is F12 or also right click and select inspect. Other browsers and platforms may have a slightly different way to access the page source. Izno (talk) 18:40, 28 January 2023 (UTC) There is no requirement to hunt down information in the page source, it is simply another way to get the date usually since indeed many pages don't have a displayed date (but of course they all have a publication date). I would suggest leaving the dates if Citation bot adds one, so long as you can verify at least in the page source that the date didn't spontaneously poof into thin air. Izno (talk) 18:47, 28 January 2023 (UTC) Not a question about Citation bot but I am trying to understand the archiving of this particular page... ClueBot III always confuses me, I usually use Lowercase sigmabot III. Anyway, in the archiving set-up for this page it states: {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis |archiveprefix=User talk:Citation bot/Archive |format= %%i |maxarchsize=150000 |minarchthreads=1 |minkeepthreads=4 |age=2160000 So...what exactly does the age=2160000 mean? At Template:Setup cluebot archiving it states that |age= How many days old a thread should be before archiving. Default: 90 But that obviously isn't the case because of the 2160000...I've tried looking everywhere around here so I can understand this but am having no luck. If someone would post what the "age=" parameters are and where I can find an easy-to-understand explanation that would be awesome. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 22:53, 29 January 2023 (UTC) @Shearonink: According to User:ClueBot_III/ArchiveThis, the |age= parameter is "the number of hours a thread can go without a reply before it should be archived". GoingBatty (talk) 23:58, 29 January 2023 (UTC) Ok, yes, I kind of know what is supposed to happen but if that is true then 2160000 hours = 9000 days. And that isn't the archiving at this page, is it? The last 2 times ClueBot III archived this page was today when the bot archived a post that was posted earlier today and then the bot archived a post from January 26th...I just don't understand when and why the bot is archiving and the code that is posted way up there at the top...Teach me your ways O Wiki Mavens & Coders... Shearonink (talk) 02:58, 30 January 2023 (UTC) |archivenow= is the key. AManWithNoPlan (talk) 03:09, 30 January 2023 (UTC) As AMWNP implies, you can set at least ClueBot up to archive based on wikitext patterns. (I daren't put the specifics in this section lest the bot archive it. :) Izno (talk) 03:27, 30 January 2023 (UTC) AH! THANK YOU...gawd it was driving me crazy!!! I knew I was missing *something*. Geebus... Shearonink (talk) 03:40, 30 January 2023 (UTC) Such as  Not a bug Now we wait. AManWithNoPlan (talk) 14:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC) Archiving not working Talk page archive problems with archiving User:MiszaBot/config House of Hesse jewel theft https://www.nationalww2museum.org/search?keys=The+Hesse+Heist Royals and the Reich: The Princes von Hessen in Nazi Germany By Jonathan Petropoulos https://books.google.com/books?id=EuU4PhMmt9kC&pg=PR4&dq=Petropoulos,+Jonathan,+Royals+and+the+Reich,+Oxford+University+Press&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjz09-UrK3_AhVOMlkFHQAVBTcQuwV6BAgCEAc#v=snippet&q=blunt&f=false https://books.google.com/books?id=B3w7DwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false https://idnc.library.illinois.edu/?a=d&d=DIL19510802.2.3&e=-------en-20--1--img-txIN---------- publication: The Army Lawyer/Issue 1 2019, Section or Chapter: Lore of the Corps, Title: The German Job - Theft of Hesse Jewels Led to High Profile Courts-Martial by Fred L. Borch (Regimental Historian and Archivist for the Judge Advocate General's Corps) https://www.armfor.uscourts.gov/ConfHandout/2023ConfHandout/Borch1TheGermanJobTheftOfHesseJewelsInWWIILedToHighProfileCourtsMartial.pdf Schlosshotel Kronberg - Schlosshotel Kronberg Bath School disaster cite discussions Article talk: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bath_School_disaster/Archive_2#Cite_form FAC discussion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Bath_School_disaster/archive1#Support_from_7&6=thirteen At the age of editor https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/173.237.117.123 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/142.67.114.138 Talk page not archiving when using evad37 OneClickArchiver https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Evad37/Archive_11#Question_about_'User:Evad37/OneClickArchiver' Template:Archive basics American gentry refs & sources https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/09/trump-american-gentry-wyman-elites/620151/ https://dailynorthwestern.com/2022/02/06/opinion/ortiz-explaining-the-american-gentry/ https://patrickwyman.substack.com/p/american-gentry https://encyclopediavirginia.org/entries/gentry-in-colonial-virginia/ https://www.jstor.org/stable/2712438?seq=17 - American Victorianism as a Culture by Daniel Walker Howe https://www.jstor.org/stable/25080556?seq=2 - The Aristocracy in Colonial America by Arthur M. Schlesinger https://books.google.com/books?id=3cpn0_kDBVkC&pg=PT103&dq=%22American+gentry%22&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwihoOr-64OFAxVG_skDHfmaCnYQ6AF6BAgJEAI#v=onepage&q=%22gentry%22&f=false - The American Civilizing Process by Stephen Mennell George Washington Papers List https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:LinkSearch&limit=500&offset=0&target=http%3A%2F%2Fgwpapers.virginia.edu%2F

Welcome and introduction

Hi, Shearonink. This is NOT some automated message...it's from a real person. You can talk to me right now. Welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed you've just joined, and wanted to give you a few tips to get you started. If you have any questions, please talk to us. The tips below should help you to get started. Best of luck!  Chzz  ►  22:55, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

ようこそ You don't need to read anything - anybody can edit; just go to an article and edit it. Be Bold, but please don't put silly stuff in - it will be removed very quickly, and will annoy people. Ask for help. Talk to us live, or edit this page, put {{helpme}} and describe what help you need. Someone will reply very quickly - usually within a few minutes. Play in your user area. For example, create User:Shearonink/test. Edit existing articles, before you make your own. Look at some subjects that you know about, and see if you can make them a bit better. For example, Wikipedia:Cleanup#2009. When you're ready, read about Your first article. It should be about something well-known, and it will need references. Good luck with editing; please drop me a line some time on my own talk page. There's lots of information below. Once again, welcome to the fantastic world of Wikipedia! -- Chzz  ►  22:55, 10 June 2010 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Grade sources • Cite sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists • Best articles Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Pages needing attention • Peer review The missing manual

A nice cup of...

Caffieinebooost (talk) has given you a cup of coffee, for taking the time to weather a dispute. Thanks for staying calm and civil! Coffee somehow promotes WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a coffee, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy!

Spread the lovely, warm, bitter goodness of coffee by adding {{subst:WikiCoffee}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

This user is a recipient of the Editor of the Week award.

This user desires open communication and respect from the Wikimedia Foundation for the English Wikipedia's dispute resolution processes.

QThis user used to have access to Questia through The Wikipedia Library.

This user is a participant in WikiProject Articles for creation. You can help!

HThis user had access to HighBeam through The Wikipedia Library.

At the end of Wikipedia is a black mountain

When all article titles (~ 5.9 million) are sorted alphabetically the last one in the list is 黑山 -- GreenC 03:22, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Picture of the Day - December 27, 2016

I just liked the photos of this chapel so much I just had to keep them around. All the time.

Picture of the Day: The interior of the Romanesque Chapel of St. John in Pürgg, Styria, Austria. The frescos date from the 12th century, probably around 1160, the crucifix from the 11th century.

The exterior of that church

DYK 29 January 2020

These pics too - from one of the DYK articles for today...

Did you know ... that the bell of the Church of the Good Shepherd (pictured), one of New Zealand's most photographed buildings, commemorates photographer and explorer Edward Sealy?

Moar favorite pics

Yeah...another favorite pic. From User talk:El C.Enjoy.

Found this one looking for pics of cyclists

Want to post here? A simple request then...

Think

Think before you post. OK?
And ummmm...if you want to leave me a message here, it's easy, just click on the
New section tab up at the top.
Thanks.

Hi Shearonink

I am new to Wikipedia & I have just created a noteworthy article "Shudra - The Rising... A Film" on the upcoming movie "Shudra - The Rising". You have wrote that this article is not "significant & important" enough to be added to wiki. I would request you to review it once again as this article supports to the existing topic of Wiki Shudra as a visual because the contents of shudra would be more liked by anybody in visuals & that is possible only when they are informed about such kind of movie & its links. This article has references of "Times of India" a leading newspaper of India, "Bollywood Hungama" a leading bollywood news site of Film Industry, moreover it has links on "IMDB" the international hub of movie database, we have our own website... there are hundreds of other links can be cited here, even if you just type "shudra" on any search engine or social websites (including google, youtube, facebook etc.) you will get the info of the film. As you have reviewed this article & found 'not acceptable' for wiki I wanted to ask you what else I should put in my article to get it accepted. I don't even know how to write on your talk page so I just edited one message on your page (plz don't take it as an offence) if this is supposed to be a message to you.

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. When you recently edited List of professional cyclists who died during a race, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Columbia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:09, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Edit war

Shearonink, I would be glad for moderation. If you have any suggestions please, please make them known. I have tried to use the page's talk section, users from the institution continue to remove relevant facts from the institution's page. First it was academic accreditation (now resolved), and now it is the historic position of the institution as both pre-millenial and dispensational (the school accepts both but not other eschatological viewpoints) Hungus (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:44, 9 April 2012 (UTC).

Per Handling of edit-warring, it would be best if you first discuss the various issues about the subject with any involved editors at Talk:Criswell College. If that has already been tried, then you need to go to the next step which is to post a request at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring asking for guidance from an administrator. Shearonink (talk) 17:56, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dorothy Z.Duval 1917-2005

Hello Shearonink, I did put a page up for consideration for the Artist Dorothy Duval as there is no reference to here on this site, shame as she is quite well known and was for a time in my youth my next door neighbour.She was exhibited at the Stco Exchange, Royal Society of Marine Artists show on three occasions and in WhosWho in Art 1977 edition where it tells of all her awards. Most of which I quoted in my text. What do I have to do to get a page in Wikipedia about Duval ? 1917-2005. I think you should have something on her as she was well considered in UK and France. Please advise. Thanks from Barriebrdc. [Wikipidia does write about me under motor sport as I was a professional racing driver in the 1960'sand 70's] Barrie Smith BRDC. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.154.252.51 (talk) 07:45, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Your draft did not specifically reference particular statements about Duval. She received a silver medal, had a Diploma, exhibited in various venues?...who said so? You have to prove that she did what you claim she did by citing specific independent published reliable sources. One of the guiding principles of Wikipedia is verifiability, readers have to be able to verify whatever claims and assertions are made about a subject. I suggest you take a look at Wikipedia Good Articles/Art & Architecture and use some of them as examples, like Joanne Gair and Barbara Howard (artist). If you haven't already, please go through the Wikipedia Tutorial, it's an easy step-by-step introduction to editing on Wikipedia. Then after you've read through the Tutorial, your first article can walk you through the process of writing an article. Hope this helps, Shearonink (talk) 13:40, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks - it worked

Shearonlink

My Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Emilia Pires is done, take a look! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Emilia_Pires

Thanks for the subst:submit tip - it worked - and the page is in queue awaiting for approval.

Hopefully I've done enough this time and the page will get approved. I think this person is really worthy of a page on Wikipedia.

Thanks again for your help. Really appreciated. Nerissa

Update: ShearonLink - my page got approved and has been published. Thanks for the advice!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Njm2012 (talk • contribs) 03:02, 23 April 2012 (UTC) (Njm2012 (talk) 05:42, 11 April 2012 (UTC))

declining an AFC submissions

What is wrong with the inline citations at this edit? The user had inline citations although they aren't reliable! (I have that person watchlisted) mabdul 06:07, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

I'm not sure what your question is, but the inline citations are malformed in their intent - Ref#2 is to a blog written by the subject of the article, Ref#1 is to PopArchives.com.au and I don't see any editorial team at that site, nothing about the people who compile the information or the writers, so, yes, their reliability is unclear to me even if the structure is sufficient. If you disagree with my assessment, feel free to revert it and use your own Review, I don't mind. I do think this draft-article is basically unreferenced (from reliable sources anyway) and have also noticed that the parent article (about Artie Wayne) has no References, and only has External Links. Shearonink (talk) 06:28, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Yes, you are right: the references are bad (so decline as |v=), but they are inline. (and your decline reason is that they aren't; edit summary: (Declining submission: submission lacks inline citations)). mabdul 07:21, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

In your post above you asked me "what was wrong" with the inline citations, I then told you. Trying to remember my thought processes about that particular Review?...I think I looked at the draft, saw that it had *some* references and that the footnote structure was being followed, saw that there were only *two* footnotes and used the Decline because there weren't enough footnotes/references to sustain an article so it does lack (enough) inline citations. The AfC Review Tool uses an automatic edit summary that does not completely line up with the automatic comment in this case, it also does not have a Preview option...a Reviewer cannot see the Review/Decline/Comments/edit summary until after the Submit button is hit, so sometimes the Reviewer's intent is unclear. I would not have considered it an unreasonable revert if you had already gone ahead, reverted my Review and changed the Decline reason to your satisfaction. Shearonink (talk) 14:35, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Please take a look at the (Custom) Review as well as the creator's talk page now: Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/From The Inside (song), User talk:Inkimuff. I think this addresses all of your concerns, plus the creator has now been pointed towards the Teahouse for additional helps with their editing. Shearonink (talk) 17:07, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

thx

Thanks for closing out the help request at User talk:BatesMotel6/Washington Institute for Graduate Studies. I didn't figure I should close it, since the user seemed to be hoping to find somebody to second-guess my article edits and my statements on the user's talk page. Thanks for acting as a third party in the situation. --Orlady (talk) 03:29, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:AfC History of Texas City, Texas

Per your suggestion on my talk page, I have fleshed out my reasoning for proposing this new page and replacing the existing History section on the Texas City, Texas page. I also requested a review of and comments on the above proposed changes (both the new AfC page and the proposed condensed History section for the main page) by others interested in this project. Please see Talk:Texas City, Texas. I would really appreciate your comments, too. Thanks.

You're invited to Wiki-Gangs of New York @ NYPL on April 21!

Wiki-Gangs of New York: April 21 at the New York Public Library

Join us for an an civic edit-a-thon, Wikipedia meet-up and instructional workshop that will be held this weekend on Saturday, April 21, at the New York Public Library Main Branch. Venue: Stephen A. Schwarzman Building (NYPL Main Branch), Margaret Liebman Berger Forum (Room 227). Directions: Fifth Avenue at 42nd Street. Time: 11 a.m. - 5 p.m. (drop-ins welcome at any time) The event's goal will be to improve Wikipedia articles and content related to the neighborhoods and history of New York City - No special wiki knowledge is required! Also, please RSVP!--Pharos (talk) 18:37, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Steamboat citations

Noticing your recent note to User:Valfontis about problems with Steamboats of Coos Bay, I made some improvements to the article this morning. It should be possible now to track down specific page numbers for the unsourced claims. Finetooth (talk) 19:19, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Wikimedia DC Meetup & Dinner

Please join us for a Wikimedia DC Meetup & Dinner on Saturday, May 5. This will be a great opportunity to meet other Wikimedians from the DC area, discuss upcoming Wikimedia DC activities and events, and have fun over dinner and drinks. All ages are welcome! Kirill [talk] 04:10, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

follow up

Hi, I have included the references following what you directed. would you mind to see the article now please?My user name is Drpraveenks--Drpraveenks 18:41, 19 April 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drpraveenks (talk • contribs)

Good article nominations

You asked for some of my current good article nominations. :) The ones I have are Burundi women's national football team, Rwanda women's national football team and Zanzibar women's national football team. (Plus I think four more.) I do not believe there really are many more sources for them available online and as they have played only one or two games (or none), there isn't much that can be said. Hence, article brevity of probably about six paragraphs each. :) --LauraHale (talk) 05:04, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

	Sea slug of awesomeness
	Thanks for trying anyway, with that guy. You're awesome. So have a sea slug! OohBunnies! Leave a message 14:23, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Sorry.

I am very sorry for my actions and/or arguing with you :).--Deathlaser :  Chat  15:45, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your help on my talk page - Facebook

Hi, and thank you very much for your generous help regarding the image issue. I will certainly benefit from your information; however, pardon me, but could you please confirm that a picture found on Facebook is also acceptable if I go through the procedure you described? Many thanks again! Dontreader (talk) 04:01, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

If the paperwork is filled out, I think so. Shearonink (talk) 04:04, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

That's excellent news, and quite a relief as well. Thanks so much! Dontreader (talk) 04:14, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Author of "Wikipedia:Articles for Deletion/SpiderGraph chart" requests a Favor!

Shearonink 4/22/12 "A Plea for Help and a FAVOR" regarding: WP:Articles for Deletion/SpiderGraph chart

Dear Shearonink,

During January & February, you were friendly and very helpful while my article was in AfCreation! I forget the date, but at some point, I wrote you about someone wanting to put notches on their belt or establishing a Kingdom?? I forget the exact way I phrased it?? Around Feb. 23rd, my article went public! On Feb. 24th, Chap, the Ripper did a Major Overhaul & Removal of most of my article. It was almost unrecognizable, the first paragraph of 144 words was cut down to 66 words, I almost gave-in to his intimidation, but I didn't want it to reflect bad on me, so I rewrote the article for the 4th or 5th time, around 3/12.

No new tags were placed on the article for almost 2 months, but the old Tags from early Feb. remained on top of the article. I thought someone had just forgotten to remove them. I thought all the hurdles had passed!

On 3/27/12, I received a notice that my article had been Proposed for Deletion by Nominator Glrx, which I answered on 3/31/12, with a 6 page "Objection to Deletion" reply, because all the accusations sounded like he hadn't even read the article! Glrx, a PhD in Philosophy, hit me again on 4/3/12 with more of the same: WP:N, DUE, NOR, NPOV, & COI, and still I proved all of his assumptions incorrect in my 8 page 4/10/12 reply!

Also on 4/3/12, Gene93k Added a Note Stating that "this debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions."

So Far, everyone that has come forth, sounds like they never read the SG or Radar chart articles and maybe not the discussion either. I feel like I'm being Sandbagged for a Speedy Deletion by a tag team of kids! I try to spell everything out for them to clarify or correct their incorrect assumptions or accusations. Today, I spent all day writing a reply to Jorgath (a 26 yr old, non-technical, college student) & Livitup.

IF YOU HAVE THE TIME, please do me a favor and read over the deletion discussions and see what you think. They all seem in a big hurry to hang the article & me out to dry and I don't know why. I just want to get on with my life!

When you read my answers, you will see that this article is very Notable!! It looks to me like, no matter what I say or do, they intend to go ahead with the Deletion. As you read the discussions, I believe you'll see that there is definitely no COI.

Respectfully requested, Greg Chester (GregLChest@aol.com) Gregory L. Chester 07:32, 23 April 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by GregLChest (talk • contribs)

Just because content of any type - articles, images, categories, etc - in Wikipedia has been published out into the public spaces doesn't mean it can't be continually re-assessed. And when that content is put up for deletion, any editor can weigh in with their opinion and vote to either Keep or to Delete. Because once content is written into any Wikipedia space (user-spaces even) and the author hits 'Save', the content doesn't belong to its creator any more, it belongs to the public. It doesn't matter who a person is outside Wikipedia, they can alter the content so long as they stay within Wikipedia's various guidelines. I'm sorry about the present situation you find yourself in, but no one around Wikipedia has any special powers to stop the process. Looking at the opinions now posted on the deletion page, if I were you I would download any of the various versions you wish as soon as possible so you have a personal copy or copies off-Wikipedia. Shearonink (talk) 13:42, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

@Greg: You are likely searching for that version. mabdul 00:33, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Help with Peer Review needed: Jayne Mansfield

Peers needed to peer review the article (here) on this peerless actor

A mid-importance article supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers that was reviewed by Version 1.0 Editorial Team and selected for Version 0.7 and subsequent release versions. The article has come a long way from a fan boy mish mash to a fair enough GA. Now is the time to take it to the next level. Currently it's going through another peer review. Please, lend a hand. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 10:11, 23 April 2012 (UTC)